Why is their evidence always nothing but assertions and cartoons?


It’s in the New York Post, so you know it must be true. They’ve extracted alien corpses from multiple crashed flying saucers, and they’ve been able to taxonomically classify the four different kinds of ET. Conveniently, they all look like they’d be able to be cast for the low-quality make-up capabilities of a TV series on a budget. They’re straight from Dr Who or Star Trek.

Stop laughing.

The Post did their research and found a former Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program advisor and CIA-funded researcher and quantum physicist to back them up. Unfortunately, their source Hal Puthoff. Puthoff is an electrical engineer (synonymous with quantum physicist, apparently) and Scientologist who is best known for the infamous Puthoff & Targ “research” on Uri Geller at the Stanford Research Institute. He has since moved on to promote remote viewing and zero point energy. He’s a notorious kook, so it’s not surprising that he’d happily vouch for those goofy aliens.

Comments

  1. submoron says

    I thought that compound eyes were not as efficient as ‘camera’ eyes. I don’t know where but I heard that they’d have to be as big as ‘soccer’ balls to be as good as ours.

  2. stuffin says

    The little guy with the big eyes looks like Paul from the movie Paul. And the Nordic guy reminds me of Jesus for some reason.

  3. flex says

    I’m kind of surprised Puthoff is still alive. Turns out he’s 90 this year. It was always hard to tell if he was a con-man or a true believer, but I’d say he inclined more toward the credulity of Prosper-René Blondlot than the obvious deception of Uri Geller.

  4. Larry says

    The fact the “aliens” have a physique similar to humans (to the extent that they have a bulge in their crotch) leads me to believe the designers of this image have a grossly limited imagination.

  5. Reginald Selkirk says

    I like how, in the last two pictures of the article, they deliberately cross into science fiction.

    This creature from “Men in Black: 2” could be a Reptilian.
    ..
    This creature from “Alien: Covenant” could be a Mantid, which ufologists believe is a bug-like creature.

  6. Reginald Selkirk says

    Video available on Amazon:
    Third Eye Spies

    For more than 20 years, the CIA studied psychic abilities for use in their top-secret spy program. Now, secrets are revealed.

    So… why did they stop?

  7. Bruce says

    For many centuries or millennia, humans commonly reported sightings or evidence of pixies, faeries, brownies, sprightly, gnomes, trolls, and other hidden people who secretly interacted with humans. Then, in the 1940s to 1950s, those stories largely vanished abruptly, and were replaced by extremely similar stories that involved unexamined outer space aliens. The obvious conclusion is that nothing has changed, and that people love to tell such stories, even if the flavor of unexamined creatures has been updated.

  8. chrissevern says

    At least 3 of them are from “Resident Alien”.

    I don’t remember seeing the insect or the Grey in Star Trek. The Lizard could be a Gorn.

    Babylon 5 had all 4 though, I believe. Although the last one was a human telepath and we all hated him.

  9. Bruce says

    As we compare possible faerie/alien bodies and eyes with our own, we should note that you never hear any religion saying THIS:
    “And God so loved the world that He gave humans the best possible eyes, designed like octopus eyes instead of primate eyes!”
    Obviously, the “evidence” from the NY Post is that God doesn’t like aliens either, any more than the humans who he designed with needless blind spots in their eyes.

  10. stevewatson says

    The IEEE ran a symposium on this? I wonder if my late father (a member, at that time) knew about that. Anyways, another data point for the Salem Hypothesis.

Leave a Reply