I read books: Philosophical Investigations

Philosophical Investigations, by Ludwig Wittgenstein, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe

To steal a description from Existential Comics, Wittgenstein solved philosophy in 1921 with the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, and then unsolved it again in 1953 with Philosophical Investigations. Philosophical Investigations is primarily concerned with what we mean with our language. Many 20th century philosophers (including early Wittgenstein) have tried to translate our language into something more precise, as if to uncover what we really mean. Philosophical Investigations argues that meaning is much more complicated, deriving from practical use.

I have a book queue that consists mostly of queer mystery and romance novels, but Philosophical Investigations was an oddball among them. I’ve been interested in Wittgenstein largely as a result of my husband. He has a degree in philosophy, and his seminar on Wittgenstein was particularly impactful. If you want to know what our banter sounds like, it’s not altogether unlike the text of Philosophical Investigations. I had never actually read it though, so I thought to correct that.

[Read more…]

Link Roundup: October 2024

How I Fell Out Of Love With Facebook | Tantacrul (video, 3:10 hours) – A comprehensive review of all the scandals that Facebook got involved in.  I had known about a few of these but hadn’t heard of the more international scandals, like Free Basics.  I mostly remember how Facebook sought to reduce bias on their platform, and through the funhouse mirror of corporate priorities it turned into refusing to take down politically conservative posts less they generate an appearance of bias.  Facebook really is a nightmare of corporate immorality.

Fast Crimes at Lambda School | Sandofsky – A long article about the scandals surrounding Lambda School, a coding boot camp.

My husband went to a bootcamp (under an income share agreement), and I went to something like a bootcamp (under a hiring fee model).  Both of us owe are career success to them.  There’s nothing about the idea that makes it inherently bad or unworkable.  But… the one my husband went to was exaggerating its job placement rates by excluding people they kicked out of the program, and excluding people who remained at their current job (!?).  The program I went through was more honest–but it all but collapsed during the pandemic.  Both of our programs were extremely selective.  From what I can tell, bootcamps operate on very thin margins, and are not easy to scale up.  It sounds like Lambda School immediately tried to scale up, and simply could not get its unit economics working, no matter how much they fleeced students.

[Read more…]

Failed origami experiments

A few times before, I’ve posted origami failures, outtakes and disasters.  This time I’ll focus on some failed experiments–design ideas that didn’t quite work out.

ten triangular prisms, partially constructed prototype

First, we have a failed prototype of ten intersecting triangular prisms.  This was after I had made four intersecting triangular prisms and six intersecting pentagonal prisms.  I thought it should be theoretically possible to create ten intersecting triangular prisms.  I wasn’t wrong!  However, I couldn’t quite wrap my head around how to construct it, so I made some prototype prisms and tried to fit them together.  I stopped at five prisms because I couldn’t quite get them to fit.  The dimensions of the prisms aren’t right, and it’s not possible to create a model from this prototype.

Acute pleats
This model is an experimental variation on Ilan Garibi’s “Wave“.  “Wave” consists of overlapping horizontal and vertical pleats.  What if the pleats make an acute angle?  What if they make an obtuse angle?  Rather than trying to visualize it, I just tried folding it, and here is what I got.  The pleats interact in an unexpected way, collapsing into a sharp point.  I also tried the other way, using an obtuse angle, but the pleats collapsed into an overlapping mess and I didn’t even bother taking a photo of it.

cube corner prototype

This last model is a prototype for a particular shape I was trying to make.  I wanted a cube whose corners had been replaced with little cube-shaped holes.  I managed to make the shape, but it felt messy, inelegant to me.  And that’s before I even figured out how to connect the units together!  I decided not to continue with this particular design idea.  I’m sure there’s a better way to do it though.

divider

These are the last of the “failure” photos in my files.  I’ve posted all of them now!  It’s not that I stopped making failures, it’s that I stopped photographing them.  Let me explain why.

I’m very interested in talking about the process of origami.  The process is very important!  A lot of what makes origami impressive is not the mere form of it, but the viewer’s knowledge that it was created with mere paper.  And so, when I started doing origami, I liked taking photos of the process.  I took photos of models mid-construction.  I took photos of paper selection, and of spare strips of paper left over.  Even photos of finished models were at first intended to be “raw”, sometimes photographed on top of the math textbooks I used as flat surfaces for folding, or next to diagrams I drew to aid in creation.

Failure is also an essential part of the process, and a particularly interesting part that is generally hidden from view.  So I took photos of the failures as well, and regarded them not with shame and disappointment, but joy and fascination.

But eventually, I suppose the novelty wore off.  Failure is an ordinary part of the process… so ordinary that I don’t feel the need to record it.  I’m not ashamed of the failures, they just stopped being noteworthy.

Tips for respecting microlabels

Readers may be familiar with the idea of stacking queer labels, especially words related to asexual and nonbinary people. For example, somebody might call themselves a nebulagender panromantic aegosexual fraysexual, and what does any of that mean? Perhaps you’ve seen these label stacks applied to a hypothetical person, a caricature meant to be mocked. Perhaps you’ve seen label stacks provided as a rhetorical example of someone worthy of respect, as if to say, “yes, we even tolerate those people”. Or perhaps you’ve seen the real thing in the wild: a person who unironically chains four or more identities together.

I’m assuming that the reader is interested in respecting others, and is not just coming here to mock labels they don’t understand. I offer some basic tips.

[Read more…]

Link Roundup: September 2024

Did you know that some of my links, I get from other link roundups?  I don’t always give credit to aggregators, since it’s not like they wrote the original article.  But in case you like more links, the ones I follow are Critical Distance (games criticism), Perfect Number (ace ex-evangelical blogger), and Ozy (rationalist blogger).  I also run a separate link roundup for The Asexual Agenda.

Oh, and in case anyone is interested, I wrote a couple queer fiction book reviews this month: Aces Wild, and The Bell in the Fog.  On to the links:

Can You Trust An AI Press Release? | Asterisk Magazine – When I wrote about LLM error rates, I pointed out even when AI companies boast of their models’ performance, the error rates are there in plain sight.  But I also said you shouldn’t actually trust those numbers.  This article goes into more depth, explaining how AI companies can select information that shows their products in the best light, while understating the performance of rivals.

The Games Behind Your Government’s Next War | People Make Games (video, 1:12 hours) – A look at the world of wargaming, i.e. games made for the serious purpose of helping decision-makers prepare for war and other crises.  The video forthrightly confronts the ethical question: is this killing people?

I think my stance is fairly favorable to wargaming.  Assuming that wargaming is effective (although this is legitimately in question), I would really rather that decision-makers are good at strategy, rather than bad at it.  I wouldn’t celebrate an incompetent soldier for saving the lives of rival soldiers.  I think it’s a mistake to blame only the military for bad wars, when a lot of the blame belongs to the cultural and political systems that decide to make war in the first place.  The part I blame on the military is when they produce propaganda that tilts cultural sentiment to their own benefit.

[Read more…]

Review: Umineko When they Cry

Umineko When they Cry is a 2007 Japanese kinetic visual novel with about a million words in it, making it the length of a series of books.  I spent the last 8 months reading it.  For many games and visual novels, people often say “trust me, it’s good, just go in blind”, but I don’t think that’s very helpful.  Therefore, this review will contain some spoilers regarding the basic premise and structure of the story, and a few specific elements that I liked.  If you’re totally avoiding spoilers and just want a five-word summary, it’s “Epic anime Agatha Christie metafiction.”

Recently, I wrote about the idea that mystery stories must be solvable.  This is not, in fact, true of most works in the mystery genre.  The solvability of mystery stories was promoted during the “golden age of detective fiction” (i.e. the early 20th century, with Agatha Christie as its most famous author), but it was not otherwise the genre norm.  However, in Japanese literature there was a revival movement in the 1980s and 90s, known as honkaku.  Umineko is clearly part of the honkaku tradition, or at least responding to it.

That’s right, Umineko, a visual novel with a million words, is a solvable puzzle.  How does that even work, without the reader feeling like they’re gnawing ineffectually at a massive jawbreaker for 8 months?

[Read more…]