The most important battle in the history of mankind!


The most important battle in the history of mankind!

A bit more than a week ago, I mentioned this interview I did for a site called One Blog A Day. The comment thread on the interview has grown in a peculiar way — John A. Davison and his pet sycophantic monkey, VMartin, are babbling away in a most painfully lunatic fashion, cruelly egged on by wÒÓ†. It’s hard to beat this comment for delusions of grandeur:

Martin and myself are waging a very effective war against the forces of darkness on both sides of this idiotic debate, sides which are dead wrong and always have been. Our success is measured directly by the extent to which we share bannishmnet and ridicule by those same factions we have exposed as charlatans, as “prescribed” victims of their fates to be mindless spokespersons of ideologies devoid of rational foundation.

We are currently involved in the most important battle in the history of mankind which is our purpose in the infinite scheme of things. Martin and I represent the forces of reason and sanity in a world which has been and continues to be destroyed by the forces of evil, ignorance, and irreversible compulsive auto-destruction which characterizes the present intellectual scenario dominated as it is by atheists like Dawkins and Meyers on the one hand and Baptist bible-banging Christians like Dembski on the other.

You really don’t want to miss it. Two guys on a blog talking to themselves are fighting the most important battle in the history of mankind! They’re doing it while wÒÓ† is goosing them with a virtual cattleprod, and most of their ‘battle’ consists of whining and bluster and wondering if wÒÓ† is me (he isn’t, sorry) but did you hear? It is the most important battle in the history of mankind! I hadn’t even noticed until now, and unfortunately I have to go get on an airplane to Boston instead of joining the battle…but I’m sure it will still be sitting there in all its futile glory when I get back.

Comments

  1. hyperdeath.co.uk says

    Our success is measured directly by the extent to which we share bannishmnet and ridicule…

    “Alas, to wear the mantle of Galileo it is not enough that you be persecuted by an unkind establishment, you must also be right.” — Robert Park

  2. Christian Burnham says

    I like how John Davison uses a quote by himself to end his emails. He could have chosen a quote from any of the great wits of history, but obviously decided that his words were smarter.

    “I am but a man, though history shall know me as a giant. I’m not so smart, though others may think me a genius” (Christian J Burnham, 2007)

  3. Andrew says

    fuck me stupid – that is the weirdest sequence of comments I’ve read. wOOt did do well, but never got anything in response apart from John Davidson and sometimes VMartin beating their chests and encouraging each other.

    But why Oh Mr Pharyngula Z Meyers [sic] did you so cowardly not notice them before? Huh?

  4. Andrew says

    Actually, on further thought, the whole bizarre thread reminds me of an episode from “Pinky and the Brain” – starring VMartin as Pinky and John A Davison as the Brain.

    J.A.D: “After dealing with my arch nemesis P.Z Myers today Pinky, tomorrow we shall RULE THE WORLD!!!! Now we just have to wait for him to show up.”

    VMartin: “Yes! Sorry – What?”

  5. Christian Burnham says

    Wow, John Davison is a study in narcissism. He goes on and on about how he’s a PhD and retired professor and how important his work is and how anyone who disagrees with him is his intellectual inferior. He seems to think that P. Zizzy is obsessed with him and his trenchant insights into genetics.

    “I am but a man, though history shall know me as a giant. I’m not so smart, though others may think me a genius” (Christian J Burnham, 2007)

  6. Ex-drone says

    Our success is measured directly by the extent to which we share bannishmnet [sic] and ridicule by those same factions we have exposed as charlatans

    So their best tactic to get their message across is to be prevented from getting their message across?

  7. Fernando Magyar says

    It is pointless to try to engage someone on the merits of their ideas when they can’t even consistently demonstrate basic competency in their native language. Unless of course these clowns happen to be non native speakers of the Anglo Saxon vernacular.

  8. David Marjanović says

    Unless of course these clowns happen to be non native speakers of the Anglo Saxon vernacular.

    VMartin is Czech, a constant reminder that stupidity is not limited to the USA.

  9. David Marjanović says

    Unless of course these clowns happen to be non native speakers of the Anglo Saxon vernacular.

    VMartin is Czech, a constant reminder that stupidity is not limited to the USA.

  10. John Vreeland says

    By drawing attention to their inane comments you merely demonstrate the truth of their supposed importance. Fortunately, I will still not have to struggle to forget they exist.

  11. says

    CB, for some reason, your second sig/self-quote cracked me up entirely… Seems, just like JAD’s thing, it really does get a bit funnier with repetition.

    (Within reasonable limits, I expect… I found JAD’s thing did get tedious sometime around post 15).

    Others have seen so far only by standing on my shoulders. And man, are my shoulders sore. –AJ Milne, 2007

  12. Ric says

    I read down to the part where Davison said that god is dead but must once have existed, and quoted Nietszche for support. Talk about misunderstanding an author.

    God that man is both stupid and insane.

  13. says

    I like the way the man with about half of the 170 posts and a self-referential signature quote refers to PZ as “arrogant and pompous.”

  14. says

    Martin and myself are waging a very effective war against the forces of darkness …

    It sure is fun to be the leader of a band!

    Even if there is only one other person in it … and he’s playing a kazoo …

  15. tsg says

    Our success is measured directly by the extent to which we share bannishmnet and ridicule…

    “Alas, to wear the mantle of Galileo it is not enough that you be persecuted by an unkind establishment, you must also be right.” — Robert Park

    Otherwise known as the “they laughed at Einstein” defense. Yeah, well, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

  16. furly says

    Puts me in mind of this Woody Allen exchange in the old Casino Royale.

    The Detainer: “You’re crazy. You are absolutely crazy!”

    Jimmy Bond: “People called Einstein crazy.”

    The Detainer: “That’s not true. No one ever called Einstein crazy.”

    Jimmy Bond: “Well, they would have if he’d carried on like this.”

  17. says

    Christian: That’s pretty good, but you have to add an exclamation before every sig.

    Hot dog!

    Einstein did the best he could, but the Theory of Relativity is laughable from a scientific viewpoint. (dorkafork, 2007)

  18. MikeJ says

    The real question of course is, when will Davidson fill up oneblogaday, forcing them to abandon it a start a whole new blog?

  19. Kseniya says

    Cane toads! Cane toads a-comin’…

    Cane toads are evidence of abiogenesis!

    They appeared in Australia
    Right out of thin air!
    One day there weren’t any!
    One day they were there!

    [Note: It must have been “thin air” because a cane toad is way too big to fit into a jar of peanut butter.]

    “Look, mommie! Doggie!” (Kseniya, 1987)

  20. Baratos says

    I love it when comments stray off-topic.

    Okay, we should charge blindly at the enemy until they die of natural causes. Remember to stay clumped together, so that a single grenade can kill all of us.” Baratos

  21. says

    You missed the even better next section from the comment:
    There is now and never was a place for any philosophy in the pursuit of the truth. It has always been independent of dogma and perspective, just waiting to be discovered.

    No room for philosophy in the pursuit of truth my ass, all pursuits of truth are based on philosophy. The *idea* of truth is based on philosophical thought.

    I guess they’re too busy fighting the (most important) battle (in the history of mankind) to go learn anything.

  22. says

    I like this by JAD:

    There is now and never was a place for any philosophy in the pursuit of the truth.

    Coming from someone whose main “arguments” for his claptrap is bad philosophy and mangled “philosophical” quotes (Bartlett’s in most cases–he can’t even research quotes with any competence), Davison’s is perhaps as great a self-blindness as we have seen in these contests.

    Of course the fact that he has essentially no understanding of the philosophy that he misuses leaves him believing that he’s only dealing in truth, not anything that should be discussed, nor, heaven forfend, established in any meaningful way.

    Glen D
    http://tinyurl.com/35s39o

  23. says

    These guys are Just. Too. Damn. Stupid.

    “Hard a starboard, Kif, full impulse. First stop, The Squid Worlds of Gliese 581. Then, The Universe!” (stogoe, 2007)

  24. les says

    “irreversible compulsive auto-destruction”

    Yikes. I feel like hitting my car with a stick, but once I start I know I won’t be able to stop…

  25. RavenT says

    “Look, mommie! Doggie!” (Kseniya, 1987)

    “Careful, Kseniya–that’s how Mr. Raven’s superpower got started.” (RavenT, 2007)

  26. drunkmikeinjapan says

    non way i am the god of tomorrow the fate. the important batttle of mankind is the battle of caesar va the helvetii. .. if no caesar against the helvetii then everyone speak mongolian. errr… somethin;

  27. says

    “Simple, really. Not to mention comforting to PZ and his Sycophantic Horde ™.”

    There’s a PZ FAN CLUB??! Why didn’t anyone tell me? Where do I join the Sycophantic Horde? Do I get a cool cephalapod t-shirt?

  28. Colugo says

    Whatever the shortcomings of their theories, L.S. Berg and Otto Schindewolf were really smart guys and don’t deserve to be posthumously associated with the ramblings of those two admirers.

  29. Hank Fox says

    I wish someone would write a book about the collective nuttiness of some of these anti-evolution flamers. Maybe a sort of Dave Barry/Bill Bryson tour of them and their ideas. Call it something like “Seplling is Optoinal.”

    I’m reading that thread and at one place I find four consecutive comments (#81-84) by Davison. Jeez.

    There was a lot of taunting of Dawkins by Davison, betting that he wouldn’t show up for the O’Reilly show (which we know he did). In comment #109 Davison refers to Richard Dawkins as a “cowardly sociopath.” That was so weirdly comical I almost blew coffee out of my nose.

    Overall, though, the comment thread made me a bit uncomfortable. In the arena of scientific ideas, I know flawed assertions have to be taken at face value and dealt with head-on. And … I know a blogger can’t necessarily ban someone just for being a nut. But eventually, Davison comes off as someone suffering a mental decline.

    Made me sad.

  30. says

    I like the wÒÓ part of wÒÓ†. This seems to me a great visual indicator of “angry woo”, as the two accents look like great angry eyebrows.

    The GFY thing in that thread there was a bit funny. I can’t honestly say I recall that ever having stood for “good for you”. Pretty plain what it is in general usage with GFY thrown into a Google search :)

    Martin: Supposing Myers and Fox is not the same person (I noticed very high occurence of bipolarity among darwinists)

    People used to get schizophrenia and multiple personality disorder mixed up in the common understanding, so let’s add in multiple personality disorder as well! Whee!

    Davison: What the hell does the Smithsonian Institute know about evolution? Get serious.

    All the while ranting about how cowardly Alan Fox wouldn’t be able to handle an interview and steadfastly refusing to give summaries of his points, directing people to his papers and not being happy about the “Inquisition style interrogation”.

    Davison: Next Monday evening 8:00 P.M. Dawkins is scheduled to be interviewed by Bill O’Reilly on Fox news. If he gets wind of what is happening to his alter ego P.Z. Meyers here at One Blog a Day he may not show!

    …but he did! Wait, alter ego? Are PZ and Dawkins actually just two faces of the Meta-Pope of Darwinism?

    Davison: Incidentally, I am not at all certain that Dickie Dawkins will even show. If he does he will be taped by me and his every utterance will be used against him in future. Of that you may be certain.

    *rant* *foam* *spittle*

    Davison: Whether Dawkins shows or not is of no significance as he is finished either way. So is P.Z. Meyers. Trust me.

    No, I won’t, and neither will anyone else with two neurons to rub together.

    *zombie chants* I love it so… I love it so… I love it so…

    You should have marked that thread with four moons and three black helicopters for the lunacy and persecution complex rating involved. Now that I’ve read the thread and suffered the consequences, I’m sure the recovery will require therapy of some sort.

    (Even if it is just an ice cream treat from Dairy Queen)

  31. Mark says

    And here the headline had me all drooling for the final showdown between Cthulu and Glorificus.

  32. Torbjörn Larsson says

    So their best tactic to get their message across is to be prevented from getting their message across?

    And their best tactic to become popular is to become unpopular.

    “I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, which I disgustedly throw back into the great ocean before me.” (T Larsson, 2007)

  33. Torbjörn Larsson says

    So their best tactic to get their message across is to be prevented from getting their message across?

    And their best tactic to become popular is to become unpopular.

    “I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, which I disgustedly throw back into the great ocean before me.” (T Larsson, 2007)

  34. Kseniya says

    (Even if it is just an ice cream treat from Dairy Queen)

    In keeping with the overall theme, I suggest the banana split.

    And here the headline had me all drooling for the final showdown between Cthulu and Glorificus.

    LOL!

    “Mommie, look! Doggie!”

  35. says

    drunkmikeinjapan:

    the important batttle of mankind is the battle of caesar va the helvetii.

    Clearly, Caesar won, and that’s why Times New Roman is more popular than Helvetica.

    I’m on TV! (B Stacey, 2007)

  36. RCP says

    I’m confused.

    I post as David A. Johnson in the thread. I try to spoof him as closely as possible, thinking that he’ll see this as a grand conspiracy by P.Z. or his Sycophantic Horde&trade to discredit him.

    His response:

    Notice that it is just one anonymous jackass after another, not a rational man in the lot except for David A. Johnson.

    I’m speechless. He’s either playing along, or he cannot recognize a parody of himself. Normally, I’d choose the former, but given Davidson’s nuttiness I’m not so sure.

  37. sphex says

    I can’t shake the sneaking suspicion that both VMartin and John A. Davison are actually the creation of some brilliant but twisted graduate student in computer-science/artificial intelligence, who has created something that almost passes the Turing Test. I mean, c’mon.. these two are way too dumb and way too repetitive- they both sound impressively like “eliza”.

  38. says

    wÒÓ† is an academic in one of the biosciences, in Texas somewhere. Used to be a frequent poster over at Eschaton, where s/he is famous for posting links to pictures of boobies (but never tits, I might add).

  39. says

    Hoo, what a time-waster THAT was.

    We are currently involved in the most important battle in the history of mankind which is our purpose in the infinite scheme of things.

    Which is interesting, because Davison neither rates at all in the top Google hits, nor does said cracker jack rate his own Wiki/answers.com page.
    Judging from his solipsism, he’ll cry ‘Unsung heroes!’, no doubt.

  40. says

    wow…i went all through that thing, and even as a non-scientist i can smell the BS that guy was dropping, bobbing and weaving in a stiff, old-man way, gumpily accusing others of incompetence or hate or whatever while waving his cane vaguely at them. my goodness.

    “I am teh greetest!”

    -garth, 2007

  41. says

    one thought. that dude JAD may define the word “coot”. as in, “crazy old coot! he forgot his pants again!”

  42. David Marjanović says

    I post as David A. Johnson in the thread.

    :-o

    Please tell me which posts are by you, so that I don’t shoot at strawmen or can at least find out if I’ve already done that. There is, after all, no way for me to tell.

  43. David Marjanović says

    I post as David A. Johnson in the thread.

    :-o

    Please tell me which posts are by you, so that I don’t shoot at strawmen or can at least find out if I’ve already done that. There is, after all, no way for me to tell.

  44. Don Smith, FCD says

    Re; #40

    I remeber eliza as being overly concern in how you felt about things. I suppose a GFY every 4th response would have been… interesting

  45. says

    where s/he is famous for posting links to pictures of boobies (but never tits, I might add).

    The difference being…? Am I being victimized by my anthropic bias, or has the definition changed recently?

  46. David Marjanović says

    Argh. Too stupid to read. Can’t tell John A. Davison and David A. Johnson apart.

    The former’s reaction is really beyond stupidity, however.

  47. David Marjanović says

    Argh. Too stupid to read. Can’t tell John A. Davison and David A. Johnson apart.

    The former’s reaction is really beyond stupidity, however.

  48. ike says

    All i can say is the amount of sheer headed stupidity on that thread is downright amazing.

  49. Dustin says

    We are currently involved in the most important battle in the history of mankind which is our purpose in the infinite scheme of things.

    Damn, I wish I had enough time to write a Conservapedia entry about this important battle. Someone else do it, it’ll be funny.

    Thanks, Dustin, for being a dick. -Stogoe, August 27, 2006

  50. Christian Burnham says

    Oh, no. Don’t tell me that this thread too is going to run and run! JAD seems like a self-replenshing source of comedy, so I’m not too worried. It’s a bit of a pity that he can’t post on this page, or else we could really set the record for the longest thread ever.

    I like cake!

    “I am but a man, though history shall know me as a giant. I’m not so smart, though others may think me a genius” (Christian J Burnham, 2007)

  51. says

    If one strictly applied the Galileo test to Galileo, he’d flunk.

    Times Roman won out over Helvetica because Helvitica is butt ugly. (Alan Kellogg 04/25/2007)

  52. Bob O'H says

    Great how a thread about PZ has descended to a level of idiocy thanks to the dedication of JAD and his side-kick. I was amused by the way that JAD attacks Falan when he turns up – Alan always makes such an attempt to be reasonable.

    I love it so!

    PZ has descended into idiocy – Bob O’H, 2007

    Bob

  53. Tom Buckner says

    A few comments farther down, he does pay P.Z. Myers a sort of compliment:
    ………………….
    John A. Davison Says:

    This thead isn’t even about us Martin. It is about constantly ejaculating P.Z. Meyers
    ………………………..
    Even Ron Jeremy can’t achieve such athletic prowess “constantly”!
    Bravo.

  54. says

    Nobody gets to quote me, Dustin, nobody!

    Kif, I have made it with a woman. Inform the crew. (stogoe, I mean Zapp Brannigan)

  55. MikeM says

    Are Martin and Davison really just the same person?

    Just reading the posts, I’m starting to think they are.

    It’s a sort of Smeagol/Gollum thing. And I don’t really mean that in a nice way.

  56. kmarissa says

    I’m glad that people are occasionally keeping this thread alive, as it reminds me to check the comment thread at One Blog a Day, and sure enough, they’re still at it. I highly recommend comment 271. Is VMartin actually singing to Davison, or is someone here playing a cruel joke?

    I love it so!

  57. Kseniya says

    VMartin was banned from Pharyngula for being a relentless Davison mouthpiece. We believe it has been conclusively demonstrated that that he is not merely a Davison sockpuppet. But who really knows?

  58. Christian Burnham says

    JAD is still there and still posting. Bless his cotton socks.

    We all have our favorite bits of comedy, but I like it when he talks about publishing his evolutionary manifesto in Czeck

    Incidentally, my unpublished “An Evolutionary Manifesto: A New Hypothesis For Organic Evolution.” will be published in Czech. It still awaits publication in English. I have no intention of seeking a publisher in the atheist Darwinian dominated Anglo-American world and I never will. It is their loss much to my pleasure. They deserve my contempt and I am happy to supply it.

    I like cake!

    “I am but a man, though history shall know me as a giant. I’m not so smart, though others may think me a genius” (Christian Burnham 2007)

  59. Carlie says

    I want my own pet sycophantic monkey. Where can I get one?

    Stop doing that to your brother right now! Carlie, 2007

  60. Christian Burnham says

    I want my own pet sycophantic monkey. Where can I get one?

    Have you tried getting a dog, or a graduate student?

  61. Carlie says

    I wish. My school has no graduate program in biology [pout]. Maybe I can borrow one of the computer science grad students.

  62. Christian Burnham says

    Just make sure you get a collar which provides a snug fit around the graduate. Also remember to apply flea-killer monthly. You don’t know where they’ve been.

    I like cake!

    “I am but a man, though history shall know me as a giant. I’m not so smart, though others may think me a genius (Christian Burnham 2007)

  63. David Marjanović says

    And here the headline had me all drooling for the final showdown between Cthulu and Glorificus.

    :-o

    And here was I, wallowing in ignorance, believing the Great Cthulhu would just so take over. Who, pray tell, is Glorificus!?!

  64. David Marjanović says

    And here the headline had me all drooling for the final showdown between Cthulu and Glorificus.

    :-o

    And here was I, wallowing in ignorance, believing the Great Cthulhu would just so take over. Who, pray tell, is Glorificus!?!