He’s gone now, but he launched an industry that continues on

I remember this old battered paperback that was passed around my father’s family — I think it was my uncle who got it first, and eventually it settled down on a bookshelf at my house. I read it, because I read every book that found its way to my home, but I disliked it rather thoroughly. It contained nothing but glib superficial explanations of the behavior of human cultures rooted in a belief that we couldn’t possibly have done anything. Everything was given to us by godlike alien beings. Every great accomplishment by non-European societies was in service to creatures in flying saucers who bestowed their technology on all the brown people who were otherwise helpless.

It annoyed me. Also the fact that the author based everything on the most superficial, biased analyses.

My father ate it up with a spoon, though, so I can sympathize a little with all those people who made his books so popular. Erich von Däniken had hit a sweet spot in the zeitgeist; trigger a little curiosity with odd phenomena and exotic places, and then satisfy it with pseudo-scientific explanations that sounded persuasive, it you’re most sophisticated analyses were the kind of thing you’d hear from a church pulpit. He’d tickle, then pretend to scratch the itch. It has become a familiar strategy for con artists who want to get rich off normal human curiosity, but who didn’t want to do the hard work of actually studying something in depth. Graham Hancock is the latest parasite to glom onto the game.

Well, von Däniken is dead. His hustle lives on, unfortunately, as long as there are inquisitive, gullible people who are satisfied with answers that are wrong, but that fit into an existing bias.

I didn’t get shot

It was a bad day for a protest: -10°C (what is that in F? about 15,16°), 40km/hr winds, blowing snow, near blizzard conditions, roads slick and icy, yet there they were, a dozen brave individuals standing out there in Cyrus, Minnesota, getting frostbit to protest the criminal regime of corrupt murderers and liars in this country.

Yikes, but it was cold.

We had a few assholes in pickup trucks drive by and make rude gestures, and a few people just stared stonily straight ahead to avoid acknowledging us, but the majority of the passers-by would wave or honk their horns for the cause.

And then I had to drive home and struggle to keep in my lane while the wind tried to push me into a ditch. Worth it, though.

I don’t expect to be shot, but you just don’t know anymore

President Trump has declared that Renee Good was a domestic terrorist. JD Vance has gone into a mode of full time denigration of the victim of the crime, and he has been showing this new camera phone video taken by Jonathan Ross as he murders good; she is smiling and cheerful and assures Ross that she’s not mad at him, and then he shoots her and calls her a “fucking bitch”. MAGA seems to think Ross is vindicated by this.

I’m going to the local protest in Cyrus, about 9 miles from Morris. This is kind of surprising: Cyrus has a population of 300. It’s a tiny, mostly Republican town, and they are hosting a protest march here in rural red state Minnesota? I don’t expect a large crowd at all, but it’s a sign of the president’s fading support that it’s happening there.

Shadows in the snow

I was walking home from the movie theater last night, when I saw the shadows of the trees thrown on the new-fallen snow by the streetlights. I thought it was pretty.

The movie I’d gone to see was Anaconda, the bonkers ‘reimagining’ of the original horror movie Anaconda from 1997, which had been bonkers already. All I can say of the new movie is that it was a goofy bit of fluff that the actors had fun with; I wouldn’t recommend either unless you just want to escape for an hour and a half. One strike against it, though: there is some graphic, brutal butchery of two majestically large CGI snakes.

Many people are turned off if a dog dies in a movie, I hope you feel the same about vicious killings of snakes.

Stare at my wall with me

Since some complained that my atheist creed video didn’t actually show the poster I had found, here — now you can see the poster. I also take a tour of my office wall.

That’s about the most boring thing I could imagine. It’s OK, we’ve had enough excitement here in Minnesota lately.

Tomorrow, though, I’m going to go to a protest nearby in Cyrus, and maybe to one in St Cloud on Sunday. You can look up ICE Out for Good near you and do something to voice your outrage. It’ll accomplish more than looking at a wall.

I’ve always known Robin Ince was a good guy

I used to think the BBC was a pretty good network, too. I’m still right about Robin, but I’m proven mistaken about the BBC — they pressured Robin Ince to resign because he was outspoken about trans rights and neurodiversity. So, fuck the BBC.

Rebecca Watson was curious why Ince’s popular co-host, Brian Cox, had said nothing about this. She dug a bit into that, and has discovered that Brian Cox’s wife, Gia Millinovich, is neck-deep in the British anti-trans movement. I guess that mystery is tentatively solved.

If you aren’t familiar with Robin Ince, my sympathies, you can check out Ince’s and Cox’s Infinite Monkey Cage, which is still lurking within the BBC Earth Science channel on YouTube. Or you can check out the Cosmic Shambles substack.

The obvious comparison

Too on-the-nose? I don’t think so. Lysenko was put in charge of Soviet agriculture after declaring that Mendelian genetics was false, and that his Lamarckist delusions were the future of science. Robert F. Kennedy Jr rejects germ theory and immunology to promote his “miasma theory” bullshit. Lysenko came to power in the 1920s, RFK Jr a hundred years later.

It’s about time we noted the parallels between the two charlatans.

Lysenko’s views and actions have a resonance today when considering the activities of Robert F Kennedy Jr, who was appointed by Donald Trump as secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services in February 2025. Of course, Trump has repeatedly sought to impose his own agenda on US science, with his destructive impact outlined in a detailed report published by the Union of Concerned Scientists in July 2025.

Lysenko set Soviet science back by decades. We should ask how far the similarities will go. It’s not reassuring.

Lysenko retained his position after Stalin died, and was reappointed by Kruschev. His scientific influence was waning — that none of his methods worked led to disaffection in the scientific community, if not so much in the political community. He wasn’t denounced until the mid-1960s (remember Sakharov?) and lingered on in retirement until his death in 1976.

If the parallels hold, let’s hope they don’t, we’re going to be wrestling with the ideological garbage RFK jr infused into American science until the 2060s.