[checks a perhaps-inobvious source of info on the thingie in the picture]
…and I’d be wrong. Well, well. Weird little beastie(s).
sugarfrostedsays
I think I know what animal it is exactly, but I feel bad revealing it. Tunicates are a weird subphylum.
Owlmirrorsays
The picture link says Botryllus planus; the WikiP page for Botryllus says:
“Botryllus is a genus of colonial ascidian tunicates in the family Styelidae.”
So sugarfrosted@#2 is correct. Dingdingding!
Tunicates are freaking weird.
chigau (違う)says
Where is the fekkin’ chord?
The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledgesays
Where is the fekkin’ “chord”?
In the larval stage. Once they find a spot and settle down, they lose it.
chigau (違う)says
That Creator™ dude was kinda a putz….
lumipunasays
It’s uncle Harry. I always said that sessile lifestyle isn’t good for his shape.
clsisays
But is it “an animal,” singular, or a colony of many animals? A solitary tunicate typically has two siphons: one for taking stuff in, and one for sending it out. As I understand it, in this colonial tunicate, each of the smallest holes we see in the photo is an inlet siphon, and the larger holes are shared outlet siphons. For another example (with explanation), see
The use of tunicates as a source of biofuel is being researched. The cellulose body wall can be broken down and converted into ethanol
Huh? I thought cellulose was exclusive to plant cell walls?
blfsays
Define “single organism”.
Well, the mildly deranged penguin is certainly singular, much to the relief of all the multiverses.
mikehubensays
Tunicates may be weirder than we think. WHOLE GENOME COMPARISONS REVEALS A POSSIBLE CHIMERIC ORIGIN FOR A MAJOR METAZOAN ASSEMBLAGE. This paper suggests: “The simplest explanation is that the modern tunicate (as represented by Ciona intestinalis) began as a hybrid between a primitive vertebrate and some other organism, perhaps from an extinct and unidentified protostome phylum.” This echoes ideas from “The Origins of Larvae”, which I thought could always be tested by genome comparison.
Jethro says
In order: Yes. Yes, but only because I think you in particular are somewhat trustworthy.
sugarfrosted says
Is this a colony of sea squirts?
chigau (違う) says
links
or it aten’t real
cubist says
Some breed of coral, would be my first guess…
[checks a perhaps-inobvious source of info on the thingie in the picture]
…and I’d be wrong. Well, well. Weird little beastie(s).
sugarfrosted says
I think I know what animal it is exactly, but I feel bad revealing it. Tunicates are a weird subphylum.
Owlmirror says
The picture link says Botryllus planus; the WikiP page for Botryllus says:
“Botryllus is a genus of colonial ascidian tunicates in the family Styelidae.”
So sugarfrosted@#2 is correct. Dingdingding!
Tunicates are freaking weird.
chigau (違う) says
Where is the fekkin’
?The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge says
In the larval stage. Once they find a spot and settle down, they lose it.
chigau (違う) says
That Creator™ dude was kinda a putz….
lumipuna says
It’s uncle Harry. I always said that sessile lifestyle isn’t good for his shape.
clsi says
But is it “an animal,” singular, or a colony of many animals? A solitary tunicate typically has two siphons: one for taking stuff in, and one for sending it out. As I understand it, in this colonial tunicate, each of the smallest holes we see in the photo is an inlet siphon, and the larger holes are shared outlet siphons. For another example (with explanation), see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botrylloides#/media/File:Botrylloides_magnicoecum,_Bare_Island.jpg
So is that a single organism or many? How about if it started as a few different colonies that merged into one as they grew?
killyosaur says
I found this: https://invasions.si.edu/nemesis/browseDB/SpeciesSummary.jsp?TSN=159376 which gives a source for the photo (in case people were curious)
PZ Myers says
Heh. Define “single organism”. Are you one?
Bruce Keeler says
Hmm. The wikipedia article on tunicates says:
Huh? I thought cellulose was exclusive to plant cell walls?
blf says
Well, the mildly deranged penguin is certainly singular, much to the relief of all the multiverses.
mikehuben says
Tunicates may be weirder than we think. WHOLE GENOME COMPARISONS REVEALS A POSSIBLE CHIMERIC ORIGIN FOR A MAJOR METAZOAN ASSEMBLAGE. This paper suggests: “The simplest explanation is that the modern tunicate (as represented by Ciona intestinalis) began as a hybrid between a primitive vertebrate and some other organism, perhaps from an extinct and unidentified protostome phylum.” This echoes ideas from “The Origins of Larvae”, which I thought could always be tested by genome comparison.
abbeycadabra says
You can’t fool me. This is obviously an aquatic orange peel.
ironflange says
Rock Vomit.
cherbear says
Colonial tunicate? We used to get them (not this particular species) growing all over oyster boxes when I used to work for an oyster farm.
cherbear says
They were real pests too. The star tunicate I believe. I was under the impression they were an invasive species.