Lying about the ACA problems

As I said before, I think that the problems with the Affordable Care Act are technical and therefore soluble. It is already the law and is not going to be repealed. While it is true that the implementation of the ACA has problems, some of them serious, The Daily Show wonders why those opposed to it feel the need to exaggerate and even flat-out lie about them. [Read more…]

Some surprising facts about cardinals and Supreme Court judges

Last week a surprising rumor began to be floated that pope Francis may appoint some women as cardinals of the church. This rumor was quickly batted down by the Vatican but before they did my puzzled reaction was ” How can a church that bars women from being priests have them as cardinals?”

It turns out that while women cannot be deacons, priest, or bishops there is no prohibition against women cardinals. [Read more…]

An online symposium on the Greece prayer case

Scotusblog provided a timeline of the Greece prayer case, along with links to all the filings and Friends of the Court briefs that were submitted. (For more see here and here.) In September, in preparation for this case, Scotusblog also had an online symposium on it and invited several people with differing views to submit opinions, which I briefly summarize below. Note that these were written before the oral arguments yesterday. [Read more…]

A crazy Republican party may not be a good thing

The steady movement of the Republican party towards total dominance by the crazies is undoubtedly going to hurt them in elections. Some argue that this is a good thing because it will make them marginalized. While this will undoubtedly make it easier for Democrats to win elections, especially at the Congressional and presidential level, it could well be a bad thing for progressive causes in general because of the general law that politics abhors a vacuum and that candidates will seek to fill as much space on the spectrum of viewpoints as they are allowed to get away with. [Read more…]

Oral arguments in the Greece case

Lyle Denniston gives a good summary of the oral arguments presented today at the US Supreme Court in the Greece prayer case. (You read the transcript of the proceedings here.) The upshot seemed to be that the judges were skeptical of the reasoning in the precedent-setting 1983 Marsh v. Chambers case that historical practice could be used to justify ceremonial prayers at government meetings. That reasoning had led to some confusion in interpretation by the lower courts, which may be why the US Supreme Court took up this case, hoping to arrive at a clearer ruling. [Read more…]