I do not trust this article about the chaos at the university of Austin, UATX. The author’s premises are unsound.
The inaugural year of the University of Austin, or UATX as it’s known, had been marked by the frenzy and occasional chaos that one might expect from a start-up aimed at disrupting American higher education. The audacious experiment — the construction of a new university ostensibly based on principles of free expression and academic freedom — had drawn the interest and participation of a star-studded cast of public intellectuals, academics and tycoons.
It was not ostensibly based on principles of free expression and academic freedom
. That is a lie. It was populated with a class of disaffected professors who were mad that their right wing views, misogyny, and racism were not getting the love they wanted from existing universities. Free speech
was their excuse, but what speech was not allowed? That universities did not like demeaning black students, digging up the graves of Native Americans, harassing women on campus, White Nationalism, hating diversity, or kicking Palestinian students off campus? Those were the issues that motivated the early fans of UATX.
It was built by a couple of billionaires to justify their views, and it was rabidly endorsed by Bari Weiss, who also promoted the Intellectual Dark Web
, and is now in the process of destroying the credibility of CBS News. It’s not at all about free speech, and is entirely about propping up a dying authoritarian ideology. Jesus, they’ve even got a bust of Bari Weiss proudly displayed in their library. I can’t take them seriously.
As for their star-studded cast
, the author of this article tries to list them, and has to admit that the faculty “lean” right…more like they’re all lying on the floor, clutching their appendix.
The list leaned right, to be sure. Loury, who is Black, zealously opposes affirmative action. Mamet had called Trump “the best president since Abraham Lincoln.” Hock served as chairwoman of an organization called Texas GOP 2020 Victory. Several of the academics had experienced backlash for taking conservative positions. These included Dorian Abbot, a geophysicist who’d had a planned lecture at MIT on extraterrestrial life canceled over his views on DEI; Peter Boghossian, who’d resigned from Portland State University in part because of the institution’s response to his sending hoax articles to academic journals; and University of Sussex professor Kathleen Stock, who’d faced protests over her allegedly transphobic views, which she disputed.
To single out just one of these rogues, Kathleen Stock. She has said that trans women are still males with male genitalia, many are sexually attracted to females, and they should not be in places where females undress or sleep in a completely unrestricted way
; she’s a trustee of the LGB Alliance; she has declared that there are only two immutable sexes, man and woman, erasing the existence of people who don’t fall into her binary categorization. Yet she claims she is not transphobic. The author is intentionally ignoring the evidence that UATX was a right wing project all along. His article is full of material that I would use to argue that it was not a credible source from the very beginning.
For instance, here’s an image used in one of their courses (not a science course; I don’t think they have any of those).
OK, we’re done. It’s not possible to defend the intent of the founders of UATX; it’s a house of cards built on a foundation of garbage.
It is true that it seems to be disintegrating, though. There have been prominent defections, included by some actually prominent professors, so it’s collapsing into a dungheap of aggrieved losers. There has lately been a huge conflict at the university.
The night before, the campus had hosted a dinner and conversation between the prominent conservative historian Niall Ferguson and Larry Summers, the former Harvard University president and Treasury secretary. Later, that evening, the billionaire entrepreneur Peter Thiel would deliver the first of a series of lectures on the Antichrist. People at UATX had grown accustomed to fast-paced action.
But in the afternoon, all of the professors and staff were summoned, quite unusually and mysteriously, to a closed-door meeting. It had been called by Joe Lonsdale, a billionaire entrepreneur who’d co-founded the data analytics company Palantir Technologies with Thiel. Together with Ferguson and the journalist Bari Weiss, Lonsdale had been a driving force behind the creation of UATX and was a member of the board of trustees. But he wasn’t often present on campus, and it was almost unheard of for a member of the board to summon the staff, as Lonsdale had.
The campus was quiet that Wednesday, the first of the spring term. The college, which operates under a quarter system, doesn’t schedule classes on Wednesdays, and so no students would be around to see the staff coming and going from the conference room in the elegant, former department store where UATX had made its home. Through the window, one could see the huge American flag in the atrium, illuminated by a skylight in the ceiling. It was a warm, pleasant day in Austin, but Lonsdale’s mood didn’t match the weather.
“Let’s get right into it,” he said. Then, with heightened affect, Lonsdale explained his vision for UATX — a jingoistic vision with shades of America First rhetoric that contrasted rather sharply with the image UATX had cultivated as a bastion of free speech and open inquiry.
“It was like a speech version of the ‘America love it or leave it’ bumper sticker,” one former staffer told me, and if you didn’t share the vision, the message was “there’s the door, you don’t belong here.” Like many of the people I spoke with for this story, the staffer was granted anonymity for fear of reprisal. “It was the most uncomfortable 35-to-40ish minutes I’ve ever experienced. People were shifting uncomfortably in their seats.”
One attendee described the contents of Lonsdale’s speech as essentially a right-wing version of the Statement of Faith you’ll find at places like Answers in Genesis. You have to subscribe to four principles to work at UATX:
“That all staff and faculty of UATX must subscribe to the four principles of anti-communism, anti-socialism, identity politics, and anti-Islamism (this is the first time I heard of these four principles);
“That ‘communists’ have taken over many other universities and that he, Joe Lonsdale, would stay on the board for fifty years to make sure that no ‘communists’ took over UATX (the identity politics crowd and some Islamists are a threat, but the Marxist-Leninist menace in 2025?)”
Oooh, I guess the identity politics crowd
are a threat similar to the Red Scare of the 1950s. To work at UATX you now have to swear on the ghost of Joe McCarthy now, I assume.
Remember, this university that the author claimed was built on a virtuous foundation of Free Speech was actually established with the big money of a billionaire and the propaganda of a Zionist apologist for the Trump administration. That billionaire was…Joe Lonsdale. The mask is off. Many of us could see right through it on the day this lie of an educational institution was announced.
Never trust a billionaire. They all lie.





[unclosed ‘Gumby’ tag at “To single out […]]
I honestly thought at first that the “ensoulment” picture was humorous.
People should realise that right-wing oppression is no better than left-wing oppression. It is certainly true that someone who openly declares that he wants to discriminate against political opinion should not be in charge of any government data anywhere.
It is indeed a collection of the worst people in the USA.
Niall Ferguson is a complete idiot.
His main claim to fame was defending the Iraq war long after it was obvious that it was a major failure. He is a neocon and British imperialist.
Larry Summers was kicked out of Harvard for a lot of things but his long standing misogyny was a big part of it. Summers doesn’t think women are very bright.
Women think Summers is a hater to be avoided.
From that Ensoulment image, “Raises the question: if there’s only one soul at conception, which twin receives it?”
Obviously, the evil one, the thieving fucker…
I notice when the mean people get together to discuss ‘cancel culture’ they never seem to mention Colin Kaepernick.
Their definitions:
Freedom: you’re free to say, think and look the way we do and only this way.
Free speech: we can say whatever we want and you can’t stop us, you have to listen to us and you can’t complain or rebut any of it.
And any harm that comes from not following and respecting this is entirely justified, including death.
So, the fascist right-wingers were stupid and naive enough (looking at you, Bari Weiss) to believe that the Big Billionaire wanted to buy “unfettered free speech” (meaning, their own particular hateful and rigid ideology?) They were all that sunk into and blinded by their resentment and idiology?
Seems so. As PZ says, from day one, most people not so blinded did, and do, understand how capitalism works: big billionaires buy things to advance their own person strict and restrictive (not to mention, dictarorial and insane) power-agenda, to which all must adhere or be banned (See: Twitter)
Poor fools! /s. No pity at all for those who steadily stare at a fantasy of indulging their evil and hateful wishful thinking instead of attending to the facts on the ground.
Isn’t there some line in Shakespeare excoriating such idiocy? “He who pays the piper calls the tune”, or something?
What free speech looks like:
APSU to pay $500,000 to professor fired, then reinstated over Charlie Kirk post
The idea that there could be a credible and fact based compromise position between a theologian and a biological viewpoint un-held by biologists, that this was put on paper by someone who then said said to themselves ‘Job done, beer o’clock!’, is hilarious to me.
@9– QFT.
I notice that the “Religious View” only describes the conservative Christian perspective, with a weasel “many” to fake-acknowledge other beliefs without describing any of them.
That image is copied straight from the Wikipedia entry on ensoulment — no problems there, it’s under a CC license — but the Wikipedia page has a good summary of the religious controversies around ensoulment in its first 2 paragraphs. That is, the author hasn’t honestly reflected on the source material.
Even the so-called “Compromise” is wrong. The vast majority of biologists don’t accept ensoulment at all, and most of those who do acknowledge that it is a non-scientific belief. Besides, there’s no “compromise” position a tenet and its skewering refutation.
Even worse, all the views described, including the “biological”, are written to imply that 14 days is the magic moment…which just happens to be the earliest most women will know they’re pregnant. This is just fake science to support a crude anti-abortion agenda.
Remember when the threat of people being attracted to women in women’s spaces was focused on cis lesbians? You would think a “trustee of the LGB Alliance” would
Lonsdale is also the POS who wants to bring back public hangings.