Speech is a hot-button issue these days, with inflammatory rhetoric being spouted everywhere and those who are called out on it claiming to be victims of censorship and ‘cancel culture’. The radio program On The Media had a very thoughtful discussion on the controversial issue of free speech. Host Brooke Gladstone spoke with Andrew Marantz about the heated response he got to a 2019 New York Times op-ed Free Speech is Killing Us that he had written that had argued against free speech absolutism, saying that noxious speech can metastasize into physical violence. He cited many instances where hate speech had resulted in deaths.
Having spent the past few years embedding as a reporter with the trolls and bigots and propagandists who are experts at converting fanatical memes into national policy, I no longer have any doubt that the brutality that germinates on the internet can leap into the world of flesh and blood.
The question is where this leaves us. Noxious speech is causing tangible harm. Yet this fact implies a question so uncomfortable that many of us go to great lengths to avoid asking it. Namely, what should we — the government, private companies or individual citizens — be doing about it?
