Cesar Chavez revealed as pedophile and rapist


An investigative report reveals that the man who has long been viewed as a civil rights icon and who organized the farm workers into a union and improved their conditions, was a serial sex abuser and rapist who took advantage of girls as young as 13.

Through a series of grueling fasts, grape boycotts and marches that captured the world’s imagination, Mr. Chavez drew a spotlight to the plight of the American farmworker. He not only improved wages, living conditions and health care for generations of farmworkers and their families but also strengthened the political power of Latinos, giving their voice and concerns an urgency and moral authority on the national stage.

Ms. Murguia and another woman, Debra Rojas, say that Mr. Chavez sexually abused them for years when they were girls, from around 1972 to 1977. He was in his 40s and had become a powerful, charismatic figure who captured global attention as a champion of farmworker rights.

The two women have not shared their stories publicly before, and an investigation by The New York Times has uncovered extensive evidence to support their accusations and those raised by several other women against Mr. Chavez, the United Farm Workers co-founder who died in 1993 at the age of 66.


Ms. Murguia and Ms. Rojas, both of whom are now 66, were the daughters of longtime organizers who had marched in rallies alongside Mr. Chavez. He used the privacy of his California office to frequently molest Ms. Murguia, she said. He had known her since she was 8 years old. She became so traumatized that she attempted to end her life multiple times by the age of 15.

As if often the case, once news such as this leaks out, the floodgates open and many more people come forward saying that they were either victims or knew about this behavior and said nothing at the time. It is this enabling culture surrounding famous people that allows such abuses to continue for a long time.

A handful of Mr. Chavez’s relatives and former U.F.W. leaders have been aware for years about various allegations of sexual misconduct, but there is no evidence that they made efforts to fully investigate the accusations, acknowledge the victims or apologize to them. Instead, many of the women say they were discouraged from speaking out in order to preserve Mr. Chavez’s public image.

The abuse allegations appear to be part of a larger pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Chavez, much of which has never been publicly revealed. The Times investigation found that Mr. Chavez also used many of the women who worked and volunteered in his movement for his own sexual gratification. His most prominent female ally in the movement, Dolores Huerta, said in an interview that he sexually assaulted her, a disclosure she has never before made publicly.

She said she has held on to a dark secret for nearly 60 years.

One night during the winter of 1966 in Delano, Calif., she said, Mr. Chavez drove her out to a secluded grape field, parked and raped her inside the vehicle. Ms. Huerta, who was 36 at the time, said she chose not to report the assault to the police because of their hostility toward the movement, and she feared that no one within the union would believe her. She also described an earlier encounter in August 1960, when she said she felt pressured to have sex with him in a hotel room during a work trip in San Juan Capistrano in Southern California.

She described being stunned by Mr. Chavez’s aggression, and then numb to it. She framed her silence at the time not as an absence of pain, but as a kind of strategic necessity, particularly as a woman fighting for respect in the male-dominated world of 1960s union organizing. Now, her accusation shatters what was a widely celebrated — and seemingly egalitarian — bond between two of the most influential Hispanic activists in U.S. history.

“Unfortunately, he used some of his great leadership to abuse women and children — it’s really awful,” Ms. Huerta said.

What drives men like Chavez to do what they do? It surely cannot be that it is just having sex partners that excites them.They are often good looking and charismatic, in influential positions that give them power and prestige, the kind of people that one would expect some women to find attractive, obviating the need for them to find unwilling victims to abuse and rape. And yet they do, taking advantage of even young girls. There is clearly something twisted in their psyche, something to do with the sense of power that such abuses gives them, along with the frisson of danger that accompanies it, that must excite them, making them prefer it to consensual relationships with adults which must seem boring.

Comments

  1. birgerjohansson says

    This is an interesting divide between left vs right in english-speaking politics.
    One side is willing to revise its list of historical “leitbild” charachters, role models and heroes, admitting reality is more nuanced than a 1950s western film.
    .
    The other side hangs on to idols like the white supremacist president Wilson, the killer of millions of Indians Winston Churchill or even that goddamn witch-burner in New England.

    And speaking about people with a “w”, Alabama still has stuff named after George Wallace. Yes, I am old enough to remember the opportunistic bastard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *