Since moving to Monterey, I have been playing bridge a couple of days a week and the club has some people who love going on cruises and have done so multiple times. Then there are those (like me) who are mystified as to its appeal and would not do so even if the high cost were not a problem.
When I ask the cruisers what the appeal is, they talk of the good food that is constantly available and the variety of entertainment that is offered. But its seems to me that you could eat at good local restaurants and go to good entertainment events where you live at much lower cost and space them out for greater pleasure, rather than cram them all into one week. They also give as an appeal the fact that being on a cruise is like living in a floating hotel that takes you to different locations for sightseeing with you having to unpack only once in your cabin. I can see that constantly packing and unpacking as one goes from hotel to hotel while traveling could become tedious but hardly seems worth being stuck on a boat for a lengthy period where there is the constant risk of seasickness, not to mention epidemics of viruses. Who can forget the horror stories such as the Norovirus and Covid-19 outbreaks on cruise ships from a few years back?
I have been on long ship voyages (three in fact) but that was back in the days when I was a young boy, prior to jet planes, when this was the main mode of transport for long distances from point A to point. B, not for going on a round trip back to the starting point. My trips between Sri Lanka and England were on big ships but they were not luxury liners though they did have things to entertain people so that they did not go bonkers by being constrained for two weeks in a small space. So maybe any desire that I might have had for a long sea voyage has been satiated. Anyway, to each his own, and I figured that if these cruises satisfied the needs of others, that was fine even if I could not fathom their appeal.
But then I came across this essay by David Foster Wallace on luxury cruises that appeared in the January 1996 issue of Harper’s Magazine. Titled Shipping Out, it had two features. It described in acute detail what life on a luxury cruise is like and it also gave me a clue as to what their real appeal might be.
It is a very long essay, around 25,000 words, making it more like a novella. Oddly enough, I stumbled upon it as the answer to a clue in a crossword puzzle. I had heard of the writer David Foster Wallace with his book Infinite Jest appearing in many people’s lists of their favorite books. But I never got around to reading it or any other thing written by him. With that book, I was a little discouraged by its length of over 1,000 pages.
At the time of writing the essay, Wallace was a contributing editor to that magazine and was sent on an assignment to explore what life on a luxury Caribbean cruise is like and the people who are so attracted to it that some of them go on the same cruise year after year, sometimes with the same group of people. Wallace was clearly underwhelmed by his experience as can be seen from the fact that this essay was later reprinted in a collection of essays titled A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again and that he immediately rechristened the vessel from its given name the Zenith to the Nadir.
Wallace writes that what these cruises offer to those who can afford them is the experience of constantly having your every need and want met. Perhaps that is what their main appeal is, that for one week you can experience what it is like to be a very wealthy person with people at your beck and call who seem to exist simply to cater to your every need, and even try to anticipate them. He recounts how the cruise line goes to extreme lengths to ‘pamper’ its customers. (‘Pamper’ is a word that is used a lot in the promotional literature of Celebrity cruise lines.) Here is one passage.
This. grim determination to indulge the passenger in ways that go far beyond any halfway-sane passenger’s own expectations is everywhere on the Nadir. Some wholly random examples: My cabin bathroom has plenty of thick fluffy towels, but when I go up to lie in the sun I don’t have to take any of my cabin’s towels, because the two upper decks’ sun areas have big carts loaded with even thicker and fluffier towels. These carts are stationed at convenient intervals along endless rows of gymnastically adjustable deck chairs that are themselves phenomenally fine deck chairs, sturdy enough for even the portliest sunbather but also narcoleptically comfortable, with heavy-alloy frames over which is stretched some mysterious material that combines canvas’s quick-drying durability with cotton’s absorbency and comfort – certainly a welcome step up from public pools’ deck-chair material of Kmartish plastic that sticks to your skin and produces farty suction-noises whenever you shift your sweaty weight on it. And each of the sun decks is manned by a special squad of full-time Towel Guys, so that when you’re well-done on both sides and ready to quit and you spring easily out of the deck chair you don’t have to pick up your towel and take it with you’ or even bus it into the cart’s Used Towel slot, because a Towel Guy materializes the minute your fanny leaves the chair and removes your towel for you and deposits it in the slot. (Actually, the Towel Guys are such overachievers that even if you get up for just a second to reapply zinc oxide or gaze contemplatively out over the railing at the sea, when you turn back around your towel’s often gone and your deck chair has been refolded to its uniform 45-degree at-rest angle, and you have to readjust your chair all over again and go to the cart to get a fresh fluffy towel, of which there is admittedly not a short supply.)
Down in the Five-Star Caravelle Restaurant, the waiter will not only bring you a lobster – as well as a second and even a third lobster – with methamphetaminic speed but will also incline over you with gleaming claw-cracker and surgical fork and dismantle it for you, sparing you the green goopy work that’s the only remotely rigorous thing about lobster. And at the Windsurf Cafe, up on Deck 11 by the pools, where there’s always an informal buffet lunch, there’s never that bovine line that makes most cafeterias such a downer, and there are about seventy-three varieties of entree alone, and the sort of coffee you marry somebody for being able to make; and if you have too many things on your tray, a waiter will materialize as you peel away from the buffet and will carry your tray (even though it’s a cafeteria, there are all these waiters standing around with Nehru jackets and white towels draped over left arms watching you, not quite making eye contact but scanning for any little way to be of service, plus plum-jacketed sommeliers walking around to see if you need a non-buffet libation, plus a whole other crew of maitre d’s and supervisors watching the waiters and sommeliers and tall-hatted buffet servers to make sure you don’t do something for yourself that could be done for you).
Mind you, this was back in 1996. I suspect that cruise ships today are much larger and even more luxurious.
In another passage, he describes watching from a top deck as his fellow cruisers disembark for an excursion in the Mexican town of Cozumel.
I cannot convey to you the sheer and surreal scale of everything: the towering ship, the ropes, the anchor, the pier, the vast lapis lazuli dome of the sky, Looking down from a great height at your countrymen waddling into poverty-stricken ports in expensive sandals is not one of the funner moments of a 7NC Luxury Cruise, however. There is something inescapably bovine about a herd of American tourists in motion, a certain greedy placidity, I feel guilty by perceived association. I’ve barely been out of the U.S.A. before, and never as part of a high-income herd, and in port – even up here above it all on Deck 12, watching – I’m newly and unpleasantly conscious of being an American, the same way I’m always suddenly conscious of being white every time I’m around a lot of non-white people. I cannot help imagining us as we appear to them, the bored Jamaicans and Mexicans, or especially to the non-Aryan and hard-driven crew of the Nadir. All week I’ve found myself doing everything I can to distance myself in the crew’s eyes from the bovine herd I’m part of: I eschew cameras and sunglasses and pastel Caribbean wear; I make a big deal of carrying my own luggage and my own cafeteria tray and am effusive in my thanks for the slightest service. Since so many of my shipmates shout, I make it a point of special pride to speak extra-quietly to crewmen whose English is poor. But, of course, part of the overall despair of this Luxury Cruise is that whatever I do I cannot escape my own essential and newly unpleasant Americanness. Whether up here or down there, I am an American tourist, and am thus ex officio large, fleshy, red, loud, coarse, condescending, self-absorbed, spoiled, appearance-conscious, greedy, ashamed, and despairing.
But here’s the thing: even all this pampering doesn’t remove all the feelings of entitlement and neediness, that pretty soon you are back to whining about petty things.
Death and Conroy notwithstanding, we’re maybe now in a position to appreciate the falsehood at the dark heart of Celebrity’s brochure. For this – the promise to sate the part of me that always and only WANTS – is the central fantasy the brochure is selling. The thing to notice is that the real fantasy here isn’t that this promise will be kept but that such a promise is keepable at all. This is a big one, this lie. And of course I want to believe it; I want to believe that maybe this ultimate fantasy vacation will be enough pampering, that this time the luxury and pleasure will be so completely and faultlessly administered, that my infantile part will be sated at last. But the infantile part of me is, by its very nature and essence, insatiable. In fact, its whole raison consists of its insatiability. In response to any environment of extraordinary gratification and pampering, the insatiable-infant part of me will simply adjust its desires upward until it once again levels out at its homeostasis of terrible dissatisfaction. And sure enough, after a few days of delight and then adjustment on the Nadir, the Pamper-swaddled part of me that WANTS is now back, and with a vengeance. By Wednesday, I’m acutely conscious of the fact that the A.C. vent in my cabin hisses (loudly), and that although I can turn off the reggae Muzak coming out of the speaker in the cabin I cannot turn off the even louder ceiling-speaker out in the 10-Port hall. Now I notice that when Table 64’s towering busboy uses his crumb-scoop to clear off the tablecloth between courses he never seems to get quite all the crumbs. When Petra makes my bed, not all the hospital corners are at exactly the same angle. Most of the nightly stage entertainment in the Celebrity Show Lounge is so bad it’s embarrassing, and the ice sculptures at theMidnight Buffet often look hurriedly carved, and the vegetable that comes with my entree is continually overcooked, and it’s impossible to get really numbingly cold water out of1009’s bathroom tap.
I’m standing here on Deck 12 looking at the Dreamward [another luxury cruise ship that pulled up at a port alongside the Nadir – MS], which I bet has cold water that’d turn your knuckles blue, and, like Frank Conroy, part of me realizes that I haven’t washed a dish or tapped my foot in line behind somebody with multiple coupons at a supermarket checkout in a week; and yet instead of feeling refreshed and renewed I’m anticipating how totally stressful and demanding and unpleasurable a return to regular landlocked adult life is going to be now that even just the premature removal of a towel by a sepulchral crewman seems like an assault on my basic rights, and the sluggishness of the Aft elevator is an outrage. And as I’m getting ready to go down to lunch I’m mentally drafting a really mordant footnote on my single biggest peeve about the Nadir: they don’t even have Mr. Pibb; they foist Dr. Pepper on you with a maddeningly unapologetic shrug when any fool knows that Dr. Pepper is no substitute for Mr. Pibb, and it’s an absolute goddamned travesty, or – at best- extremely dissatisfying indeed.
The essay is hilarious and once started hard to stop reading, despite its length. It made me want to seek out his other writings, and perhaps even take a crack at Infinite Jest.
I have taken a few cruises and I have taken some longish train day trips, and I have several pleasant memories of those trips. Like any kind of travel there are good aspects and not so good aspects. I am an introvert, but I do still like to socialize, and I have found cruises ideal because it is easy to strike up conversations but it is also easy to avoid socializing when desired. There are so many items on a day’s itinerary that you can bow out of a conversation at any time by saying you have to be somewhere else in ten minutes.
Most cruises try to avoid having more than one sea day between ports, so one is rarely “stuck on a boat for a lengthy period.” I have never been seasick, nor do I recall anyone telling me they had been seasick either. Ships usually manage to steer away from storms, even if it means changing itineraries. Also, they all are equipped with stabilizers to minimize side to side rocking and today’s ships are so long that they are very resistant to up and down motion. Norovirus is avoidable by frequent hand washing. I will admit that COVID could be a problem since it is airborne, but since I work in retail I am just as vulnerable at work as I would be on a cruise.
I have only taken lower-cost cruises and only during non-peak times, so what I have paid is comparable to the cost of a decent non-luxury hotel for the same number of days, and I don’t have to pay extra for food, unless I choose to. The food which is included in the cruise price is rarely gourmet fare, but I have never disliked what I got, and there is generally a lot of variety to choose from, including health-conscious options.
Cruising is not for everyone, and like most things, you generally get out of it what you put into it.
So the material comforts may have changed, but otherwise things remain the same as in Mark Twain’s cruise onboard the Quaker City.
As I understand it, another part of the appeal is that these vessels have excellent health care facilities, and residing on one can work out cheaper than equivalent residential care.
Pre-Covid, I worked for a company that offered cruises every 3 years as a company vacation. They were cheap cruises, and you get what you pay for--in this case, hot-and-cold brawling and vomiting passengers, because it’s possible to be drunk 24/7 on a cruise line. The cabins were tiny and there was no soundproofing, so you heard everything going on in other cabins and in the hallway. The food was Golden Corral-level troughs in terms of cleanliness and quality. The “entertainment” was…not. The pool was overrun with screaming children and usually had dubious messes. The gym was in need of maintenance. About the only thing the cruise line seemed to put money in was the high-end shopping and the Late-Night-Infomercial “seminars” designed to make you buy stuff (subscriptions to dubious vitamins and plastic arch supports, mostly). The employees would joke that you might as well be vacationing in Walmart with a 24/7 bar. The excursions were mostly an excuse to get drunk and rowdy in non-US ports. The staff of those cruises were nice, but clearly exhausted and we all know they’re barely paid. I could see how that would be fun for the MAGA set, to have a slave class to boss around and feel superior to.
OTOH, I’ve heard good things about the small Viking Cruise Lines. No screaming children, no city-sized ships of drunken, brawling idiots, actual opportunities to learn things and visit ports that aren’t overrun by the worst America has to offer.
In November of 2019 (pre-COVID and pre-Brexit), I attended a meeting of the ISO standards committee for the C++ programming language in Belfast, Northern Ireland; and I thought it would be fun to make the entire trip on the surface just to see if I could. My itinerary included the Queen Mary 2 both directions across the Pond.
I had an inside cabin, the least expensive accommodation, which was comparable to first class travel generally considering that all food and lodging was included. (There are specialty restaurants where you have to pay; and alcoholic beverages are extra; but they charge it to your room so you don’t need cash. There are also a variety of shops on board selling plenty of kitsch.)
Like moarscienceplz @1, I’m an introvert; so I was happy doing some coding on my laptop or just watching the sea flow past. The entertainment that I found entertaining was a series of lectures on the history of sea transportation, current political events, stuff like that. There was also a bridge tournament which Mano might enjoy. I’ve played contract bridge socially, but I’m not very good at it, and I doubt that Mano would have any fun playing against the likes of me, even less as my partner unless I’m the dummy.
I had to travel when the ship sailed, so I had plenty of time on both sides of the meeting for riding trains and doing other touristy stuff in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. (I’ve still never been to Wales, the Republic of Ireland, or any of the smaller British Isles.) I have the complete itinerary here if anybody cares; but during the actual trip, the arthritis in by back was starting to act up; and I wound up taking taxi tours in Wick, Derry/Londonderry (not an argument this American has any business taking sides in) and Penzance.
Dunc @#3
Different cruise lines cater to different demographics, and there may be cruises that focus on medical care. I have only been on Carnival branded ships, and that is NOT true for them. They have a small infirmary designed to deal with the cuts, sprains and bruises that are typical with young to middle aged vacation goers, and that is about all. More serious medical issues are handled by just trying to keep the patient stable until an ambulance can be met at the closest port. Real emergencies can sometimes involve hoisting the patient up into a hovering Coast Guard helicopter, and the cruise line is definitely not going to pay for any of that.
Eco’s book runs around six hundred pages.
Foster Wallace is like Paglia in that he uses lots and lots of words because he means for you to understand him. You can’t skip through Paglia, but you can with Foster Wallace. He presumes you are not. paying. attention. In a way, he is right? Because I find him same-samey. You could read any of his books and be able to extrapolate what people are then talking about for some other book. Read a shorter one.
I agree with you completely on your perspective on cruises. The piece by David Foster Wallace was very funny and hit home in all the right places, especially the bovine references. I thank you for posting it.
Let us all remember that when we visit other countries, do so as a traveler, not as a tourist.
Having said that, I recently treated myself and my wife to our first cruise. It was a “Pharaohs and Pyramids cruise up the Nile River; a cruise that was described as “strenuous”, being that the day trips to the various temples and pyramids involved considerable walking and challenging descents into the tombs of various kings.
It is a tour I recommend for its remarkable educational content. Every day I learned something new about these very early civilizations; their early language, hieroglyphic writing, culture and gods. It is a fascinating fact that these very early civilizations worshiped gods that were real things, like the sun, known as the god, Ra, from which dynasty of (Ra)mses is derived.
The evolution from the worship of real things as gods, to pharaohs as gods and ultimately to our modern monotheist gods like Yahwey and Big Al was a fascinating intellectual insight. I suspect many of the readers on this site are non-religious and yet it is of value to understand how we got here in terms of how this religious evolution occurred.
While I agree with Mano that there are aspects of cruises that exploit some of our basic instincts I found this particular cruise enlightening.
Another reason to not take a cruise, which I discovered after my own trip @5, is that the ships are major polluters. There’s all that untreated human waste being dumped into the ocean (probably not a big problem on the open sea, but something you don’t want in a port); and they burn bunker fuel #5, not much more refined than road tar and containing lots of nasty stuff like sulfer. I’ve read that it needs to be heated to 50°C to keep it fluid enough to get through the fuel injectors.
Not been on a cruise but most of the friend circle who has gone on cruises has given it a thumbs up. Assuming you can afford it , and assuming your idea of a vacation is seeing new places then a cruise v/s say visiting a new country are
1. It takes out a good bit of the planning aspect (which sometimes makes a vacation not seem like a vacation , especially the popular tourist destinations during peak hours
2. For people with young to teen children , a cruise has a bunch of activities and keeps the kids out of the parent’s hair. Usually you will go with other families so the children can be sent somewhere else and the parents get a break
3. Most people try to maximise their spend on a vacation (Colloquially known as patel-giri -- The act of making sure that you get a photograph against every known monument , that you maximise the day pass that you bought , that you see everything that people say are cant be missed when you visit a city because you arent going to come back here and o a cruise is the equivalent of an all expense paid resort in cancun v/s a more hectic vacation
4. most vacations to other countries need you to visit multiple cities -- For people with children this is a pain and if you have to fly its worse
5. The cruise does have activities for adults -- some people do enjoy them.
Admittedly the above are rich peoples problem . I would guess that the type of people who love the company of a good book will struggle to see the appeal of a cruise (but then I dont see the appeal of visiting places and posing for pictures with some old piece of history too -- i’d rather read about them!)
I used to have friends (he died; she moved out of state) whose daughter was a tour guide. She was able to get them a discount for some sort of luxury experience. I believe it was a resort in India.
Anyway, when they got back from their trip they were raving about the service. The people employed to help the customers -- servants? -- would always carry their bags, open doors, hover around their table when they were eating, etc. etc. My friends loved this treatment. I listened to their long rave (very little about the experience beyond the pampering) and when they were done I could not hide the disgusted look on my face.
I played golf with the husband many times. We toted our own clubs, ate a sandwich in the little golf course diners. In general, he was not the kind of person I suspected to be a person who reveled in being treated like royalty. I guess the bug can infect anyone -- sounds like DFW started to get a bit odd during the cruise.