It’s Confederate History Month?


KansasKKKpainting

It really is! The governor of Mississippi says so, and a Republican in that fine state would never lie to you.

Fortunately, David Neiwert has been honoring the Confederacy appropriately. You should go read the whole series, it’s very enlightening.

Day 1: Strange Fruit
It Was About Slavery
That Peculiar Institution
How Poor Whites Got Suckered
The First American War Criminals
‘The River Was Dyed’
War By Other Means
Carpetbaggers, Scalawags, and the Liars Who Named Them

It was very kind of Mississippi to invite this kind of inspection of their history.

Comments

  1. dianne says

    I rather like the idea of explicitly acknowledging Confederate history. But not by “celebrating” it. Rather, by calling it out for what it was: A proto-fascist movement by the 1% to take advantage of the rest of their society. Why are we not saying “never forget” when we talk about Confederate history rather than debating whether they were really so bad or not?

  2. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    re 1:
    +1000, a month for remembrance of the those who struggled in the antebellum South and were ruthlessly slaughtered to enforce their subservience. Hold the month as a “Wall of Shame” rather the the ~~Fame~~ the Confederate descendants kept clinging to. Try to teach them actual history rather than the fantasies their ancestors indoctrinate them with.
    ugh

  3. blf says

    This month — especially April 25th, which has been designated (in Mississippi) as confederate memorial day — came up in the Moments of Political Madness thread. I rather like the suggestion from the NAACP, quoted by The Grauniad:

    National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) leaders in Mississippi reacted by proposing a civil war remembrance of their own: Union Army Heritage Month.

    “These white and black Mississippi patriots fought for the continuation of the United States of America as one nation, under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all,” Derrick Johnson, president of Mississippi’s NAACP, wrote […].

    “Should not these soldiers be honored, too?”

  4. ck, the Irate Lump says

    From the article:

    On Bryant’s gubernatorial letterhead, the proclamation starts out by explaining that April is the appropriate month to honor Confederate heritage because it is the month in which the Confederate States began and ended a four-year struggle.

    It’s amazing how well sanitized that is. It’s actually the month in which the Confederates States began and eventually lost a war to maintain the wretched institution of slavery. Their ancestors fought, bled and died to maintain the so-called right for wealthy people to own another human being.

  5. robro says

    ck — It’s also not entirely accurate. April is when the South Carolina militia fired on Fort Sumter, which started hostilities, hardly a noble moment. However, South Carolina voted to succeed on December 20, 1860, followed by Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas over the next month or so. They formed the CSA on February 4, 1861. But hey, who’s counting the number of times a Southern Republican governor puts on his stupid and gets it wrong?

  6. laurentweppe says

    Why are we not saying “never forget” when we talk about Confederate history rather than debating whether they were really so bad or not?

    You know, I wonder if the the decision by the allies to force the Germans to face the barefaced truth of their regime’s murderous savagery post WWII wasn’t in part inspired by American higher-ups who, having seen the “lost cause” bullshit at home decided that this time, they wouldn’t allow the defeated criminals to write a fictional history.

  7. says

    I wonder if the the decision by the allies to force the Germans to face the barefaced truth of their regime’s murderous savagery post WWII wasn’t in part inspired by American higher-ups who, having seen the “lost cause” bullshit at home decided that this time, they wouldn’t allow the defeated criminals to write a fictional history.

    No, it was bloody-mindedness and revulsion.

    You’ve got to remember that the people who were running the US military and occupation were pretty right wing themselves. You had plenty of people like Patton who thought that the US should ally with what’s left of Germany and go after USSR (which would have been an absolute debacle) and who had to be removed from command for loudly opposing denazification. There were a number of senior allied commanders who said stuff like “we were fighting the wrong guys” which is really fucked up when you remember that the senior allies knew about the death camps from aerial reconnaissance and intelligence assets and it was only the troops that encountered them that were surprised.