Comments

  1. says

    Thank you, PZ, for refreshing this thread. (Even though the thread is active, there’s an automatic cutoff to commenting after a certain amount of time. This is one way of keeping spammers etc. from harassing PZ via older threads. PZ refreshes the Moments of Political Madness thread when it hits the cutoff.)

    Marco Rubio said some stupid stuff about reproductive rights for women.

    I would rather lose an election than be wrong on the issue of life. [Hillary Clinton and Democrats] are the extremists when it comes to the issue of abortion.

    It’s a terrible situation. I mean, a crisis pregnancy, especially as a result of something as horrifying as that, I’m not telling you it’s easy. I’m not here saying it’s an easy choice. It is a horrifying thing what you’ve just described. It’s heartbreaking. It is unimaginable, quite frankly. I get it. I really do. And that’s why this issue is so difficult.

    But I believe a human being, an unborn child, has a right to live irrespective of the circumstances by which they were conceived.

    ABC New link.

    Rubio wants the authority to force women to bear a child, even a child that may be the result of rape or incest.

    Other, choice Marco Rubio moments of stupidity and/or robotic malfunction from the previous Moments of Political Madness thread.

  2. says

    Ted Cruz still doesn’t know what “carpet bombing” is, but whatever it is, he’s for it:

    When I say saturation carpet bombing, that is not indiscriminate. That is targeted at oil facilities. It’s targeted at the oil tankers. It’s targeted at command and control locations. It’s targeted at infrastructure. It’s targeted at communications. It’s targeted at bombing all of the roads and bridges going in and out of Raqqa. It’s using overwhelming air power.

    Carpet bombing involves indiscriminate bombing of large areas without regard to collateral damage.

    In the debate, Martha Raddatz pressed Cruz on the question of carpet bombing:

    RADDATZ: Senator Cruz, would you like to expand or loosen the rules of engagement? I was just over in a command center in Erbil and they said they thought the rules of engagement worked. Because you have so many civilians in those populated areas, they don’t want to hit civilians.

    CRUZ: Martha, I will tell you, I have visited with active duty military, with veterans over and over and over again in town halls all over the state of New Hampshire. What we are doing to our sons and daughters, it is immoral. We are sending them into fight with their arms tied behind their back. They cannot defend themselves. And it is wrong.

    Cruz also came out in favor of waterboarding, as did Trump, with Trump adding that he would use interrogation techniques worse than waterboarding.
    Debate transcript from the Washington Post.

  3. says

    I know this is hard to believe since Ted Cruz is so extremely rightwing already, but it is true that he has moved further to the right in the past two months.

    In December, Cruz said:

    We can defend our nation and be strong and uphold our values. There is a reason the bad guys engage in torture. ISIS engages in torture. Iran engages in torture. America does not need to torture to protect ourselves.

    That was then. Now that he needs to court the most extreme, most evangelical torture wing of the Republican/Tea Party faithful, Cruz has changed his tune, but he has changed it in a way that would make a lawyer blush:

    Finally, a cause to unite a fractured party. Ted Cruz refused to say that he would support torturing terrorism suspects, only because waterboarding, the torture technique he was asked about, isn’t torture. Cruz said that waterboarding is merely “vigorous interrogation” that doesn’t “meet the generally recognized definition of torture.”

    He is wrong.

    New Republic Link.

  4. says

    Donald Trump is to the right of Cruz when it comes to torture:

    STEPHANOPOULOS: As president, you would authorize torture?

    TRUMP: I would absolutely authorize something beyond waterboarding. And believe me, it will be effective. If we need information, George, you have our enemy cutting heads off of Christians and plenty of others, by the hundreds, by the thousands.

    STEPHANOPOULOS: Do we win by being more like them?

    TRUMP: Yes. I’m sorry. You have to do it that way.

    The quoted text is from the debate transcript. Link in comment 3.

  5. says

    Ted Cruz said some more stupid stuff about women’s rights:

    I’m the father of two little girls, and I love those little girls with all my heart,” he said. “They are capable of doing anything in their heart’s desire. But the idea that their government would forcibly put them in a foxhole with a 220-pound psychopath trying to kill them doesn’t make any sense at all. It’s yet one more sign of this politically correct world where we forget common sense. We gotta get back to a president who just says, “No, that doesn’t make any sense.”

    Mother Jones link.

  6. johnson catman says

    re: Lynna, OM #7
    I wonder if Cruz realizes that the armed forces in the US are voluntary, and that the government would not “forcibly put them in a foxhole”? If they consented to join the military and they were part of a combat force, they could end up in a foxhole, but no entity would have forced it upon them. Also, if the republicans would stop trying to start wars all over the world, the opportunity for such a scenario would decrease dramatically.

  7. says

    johnson 28, good points. I agree. Cruz definitely has his facts wrong, as well as his attitude.

    Also, if women are in a foxhole with a “220-pound psychopath” is that saying something really derogatory about male members of the military? Cruz’s comments are nonsense from top to bottom.

  8. says

    Ted Cruz’s campaign is continuing the tradition it has established of being the sleaziest Republican campaign in the race.

    In Iowa his campaign staff and supporters announced that Ben Carson was leaving the race, so caucus for Ted! Nope. Carson was taking a brief break in Florida, and was not leaving the race.

    The Cruz campaign also sent “voter violation” mailers to potential caucus goers, trying to scare them into voting for Ted.

    Now, in New Hampshire, the Cruz campaign sent out a mailer that says “check enclosed” on the envelope, but what is inside is a fake check made out to Cruz.

  9. says

    Super Bowl politcs: Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani dissed Beyoncé’s halftime performance, claiming that she promoted the Black Panther Party and incited violence against police.

    […] Giuliani said the pop star took a distasteful “political position” by dressing herself and her dancers in costumes that paid homage to the Black Panthers, in addition to evoking the group’s salute during the performance.

    “I thought it was really outrageous that she used it as a platform to attack police officers who are the people who protect her and protect us, and keep us alive,” he said. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/giuliani-beyonce-super-bowl

    Continuing his grumpy old man schtick, Giuliani said:

    The halftime show I thought was ridiculous anyway. I don’t know what the heck it was. A bunch of people bouncing around and all strange things. It was terrible.

    I saw some violence in the stadium, but it consisted of large football players crashing into each other. One was even taken off the field and treated for concussion.

  10. microraptor says

    So what’s this “going further with torturing people” that Trump’s in favor of, anyway? Floggings? Thumb screws? Making them watch reruns of The Apprentice?

  11. says

    Oh, no. This is not good news, and it has the potential to turn into worse news: another setback for reasonable gun safety laws.

    […] a divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit struck down Maryland’s ban on assault rifles and high-capacity magazines. In so doing, they potentially put this case on the fast track to the Supreme Court. They also risk setting off a literal arms race where gun makers race to sell as many exotic kinds of weapons as possible in order to expand the scope of the Second Amendment.

    […] the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller […] held that the Constitution does not protect “a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” The Court endorsed “the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons.’” And it also suggested that “weapons that are most useful in military service—M-16 rifles and the like—may be banned.”

    Chief Judge William Traxler’s majority opinion in Kolbe v. Hogan hinges on his assertion that the weapons banned by Maryland’s law are not “unusual,” and therefore are shielded by Heller. “The list of prohibited weapons includes the semi-automatic rifle models most popular by far among American citizens,” Traxler writes, “the AR-15 ‘and all imitations’ and the semi-automatic AK-47 ‘in all forms.’” According to Traxler, “more than 8 million AR- and AK-platform semi automatic rifles alone were manufactured in or imported into the United States” between 1990 and 2012. […]

    Think Progress link.

  12. blf says

    (In the previous incarnation of this thread, there was some discussion about the term “Western Hemisphere” in respect to a proposed, and entirely unconstitutional, state bill authorizing(? requiring?) that state’s Governor to use her/his non-existent military authority to attack / expel refugees who are not born in the Western Hemisphere. Almost precisely when the last incarnation autoclosed, I was trying to post the following…)

    If you use the conventional definition of Western Hemisphere, It excludes a fair amount of Europe and includes part of Africa: “The Western Hemisphere is a geographical term for the half of the earth that lies west of the prime meridian […] and east of the antimeridian […]. In this sense, the Western Hemisphere consists of the Americas, the western portions of Europe and Africa, the extreme eastern tip of Russia, numerous territories in Oceania, and a portion of Antarctica, while excluding some of the Aleutian Islands to the southwest of the Alaskan mainland.”

  13. says

    microraptor @12, I don’t know what Trump has in mind as expanded torture techniques, but I do know that he just confirmed that he would be willing to stand in front of a bunch of Syrian children and tell them that they can’t come to the USA. Link.

    You noticed no doubt that Trump also thinks torture works. So, all righty then, he is stupid, ill-informed, and cruel. Got it. If we had video of him making Syrian children cry I don’t think that would play well with the general public.

    In other news, cruel and stupid officials in Texas want to reclassify detention centers for undocumented immigrant children as “child care facilities.” I know Republican officials have a penchant for naming things the opposite of what they actually are, but this move is really disgusting.

    […] The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) Council submitted a proposed rule last week that would create a child care licensing category at two family detention centers […]

    The two Texas detention centers currently have the capacity to hold more than 2,000 detained women and children who are waiting for their court cases to be adjudicated. The federal government has contracts with three private prison-operated facilities in Texas and Pennsylvania to detain and process Central American women and children who began showing up in large numbers since the 2014 fiscal year.

    Big red flag right there. The private prison facilities in Texas have a terrible reputation.

    […] The category change has been widely condemned by child welfare and immigrant rights activists who gathered before the meeting to demand that state officials scrap plans. […]

    They noted that changing the name of the facilities does little to detract from its real aim of detaining children and mothers and that detention facilities do not have a good track record of detaining women and children in adequate conditions

    “Calling them ‘child-care facilities’ makes people forget the main thing about detention: you’re not allowed to leave,” […] “And as a federal judge ruled last year, no matter how rosy a picture the government may paint of these facilities, restraining children in a place that they’re not allowed to leave can cause them ‘long-lasting psychological, developmental, and physical harm.’ That doesn’t sound like ‘child care’ to me.”.

    Link.

  14. says

    Ted Cruz said some more stupid stuff about climate change:

    It’s the perfect pseudoscientific theory to justify liberal politicians’ quest to expand government power over the American citizenry.

    Marco Rubio said stupid stuff about climate change:

    I do not believe that human activity is causing these dramatic changes to our climate the way these scientists are portraying it.

    Donald Trump called climate change a “hoax.”

    “Rejecting climate science is pretty much mainstream” within the New Hampshire GOP, says Lawrence Hamilton, a University of New Hampshire sociologist who studies environmental public opinion. “It’s almost a litmus test in the Republican Party that you have to reject climate science.”

    Mother Jones link.

  15. says

    For those with the stomach for it, here is a roundup of the lies Ted Cruz told during Saturday’s Republican debate.

    In other news Robot Rubio hosted a Super Bowl party. It was sad.

    […] Rubio’s much-anticipated Super Bowl bash in an indoor sports facility next to Interstate 293, less than 24 hours after the Florida senator’s disastrous audio-loop meltdown in Saturday night’s Republican debate, may have established a new gold standard in […] “Potemkin Super Bowl party,” […]

    Rubio’s Super Bowl party only briefly pretended to be a Super Bowl party before dissolving into bleakness and confusion. There was a pretty big crowd on hand for the pregame events, when Rubio came out in one of his form-fitting navy blue “marcorubio” campaign-logo zippered fleece tops to deliver his standard stump speech, which combines geniality and meanness in a perfect Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup balance. He didn’t look like a guy who had just absorbed a grievous New Jersey beatdown from Chris Christie, doing his best Tony Soprano impression. Rubio was loose and modestly amusing. He promised to ban disco.

    No, I’m not kidding: During a bantering exchange with someone in the crowd about the awfulness of the 1970s (a decade that ended when he was eight years old), Rubio vowed, “When I’m president we’re gonna ban disco music!” Which is strange because — am I wrong about this, older folks? — Marco has a distinct disco vibe. He’s got a certain Miami Beach, late Donna Summer meets early Madonna, boy-toy charisma working, and I do not say that in a spirit of hate. […]

    Anyway, Rubio told us to enjoy the game, while making clear that he didn’t care who won since the perennially terrible Miami Dolphins were not playing. He worked the throng for a few minutes and got out of Dodge. The crowd began to thin out almost immediately, but a trio of young female campaign workers, smiles frozen in place, cracked open about 75 boxes of Little Caesars pizza and several cases of room-temperature Pepsi. […]

    Salon link.

  16. says

    This is a followup to a story we started following in November. New doctrinal guidelines issued by mormon church leaders in Utah have resulted in the deaths of mormons who are gay.

    This past November, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints issued a stunning new policy declaring gay Mormons in same-sex marriages to be apostates in risk of excommunication. The church also decided that the children of same-sex couples could not be blessed or baptized until they turned 18—and even then, only if they renounced their parents’ marriage. Immediately, a shock wave rippled throughout the sizable gay Mormon community. Wendy Montgomery, a Mormon mom who has a gay son and works with the Family Acceptance Project at San Francisco State University, believes that at least 32 gay Mormon youths have killed themselves since the announcement of the new policy. […]

    Slate link.

  17. blf says

    [Wazzock trum-prat] just confirmed that he would be willing to stand in front of a bunch of Syrian children and tell them that they can’t come to the USA.

    Reminder: What the thugs say, and especially what teh trum-prat says, uses one concept of “reality”, what they do / mean uses an unrelated concept of “reality”, and (frequently fortunately) what they accomplish is governed by Reality as most people know it.

    He could “confirm” he is a wazzock, and whilst that happens to be correct, I still would be very cautious in believing him. (He’d first have to convince me he knows what a “wazzock” is…)

  18. says

    More on the robotic nature of Marco Rubio’s campaign: it turns out that even for interviews or question sessions with reporters, his staff selects the reporters. There is no free exchange.

    Marco Rubio is running a presidential campaign marked by precision, caution and discipline — so much so that the Florida senator delivers the exact same speech, jokes, quips and one-liners wherever he goes.

    When he addresses the media, his aides select the reporters who can ask questions, often shutting down follow-ups. During media interviews and presidential debates, Rubio is quick to fall back on the same script that he often delivers before GOP audiences in New Hampshire and Iowa. […]

    CNN link

  19. says

    Sen. John McCain really dislikes Trump’s call for more torture. McCain is a Republican, but he does not hold back in his condemnation of Trump’s love of torture.

    […] McCain pointed out that waterboarding, an interrogation technique that is outlawed under the Geneva Conventions, was among the forms of torture that the Senate voted 93-3 to outlaw last summer. […]

    “They got a whole lot of information that was totally false,” the Arizona senator said of the use of waterboarding during George W. Bush’s administration.

    “Do we want to resort to doing things that our enemies do? Do we want to be on the same plane as those people chopping off heads?” he continued.

    McCain, who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, is one of the Senate’s most vocal opponents of torture. During the 2008 and 2012 presidential contests, he criticized his Republican colleagues for supporting waterboarding and other forms of torture.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-trump-waterboarding-torture

  20. says

    A bunch of Republican legislators in Michigan want to do away with permits for concealed-carry weapons. These guys; Tom Barrett, Lee Chatfield, Triston Cole, and Jim Runestad, introduced House Bills 5301-5304 on Feb. 2.

    Their claim is that the Concealed Pistol License permit requirement that is currently on the books in Michigan is “government over-reach.”

    Cole [said the permit requirement places] an undue burden on residents who want to defend themselves against criminals.

    Cole’s argument descended further into stupidity as he went on:

    Criminals don’t have to go through a training class and wait for government permission to have a handgun before they commit armed robbery, yet a law-abiding citizen who simply wants the option of self-defense has to jump through all the hoops and pay a price to carry a concealed weapon. […]

    Requiring a special permit to carry a concealed weapon just forces inefficient spending and inconveniences responsible gun owners.

    Michigan Live link.

  21. says

    There’s often a long line of likely candidates for worst Congress Critter, but maybe we should move Sheriff Paul Babeu to the head of the line. This rightwing doofus is running for Congress in the state of Arizona. Before that, he lived in Massachusetts, where he ran a school for troubled teens. The DeSisto School was notorious. A state investigation turned up all kinds of nastiness:

    The probe resulted in a court order to stop specific activities, including punishments that put students in chairs facing corners for hours at a time, withholding food from students and strip-searching. The court also ordered the school to stop group showers and allow students to use the bathroom in private.

    That’s not what kept Babeu out of Congress on his first attempt. No, the tactic that defeated him was a news that he was gay. Classy Arizona politics.

    A home video, newly-emerged, gives us a taste of just how bad Babeu is.

    […] He calls his students “bonkers” and explained, among other things, that they could be made to sit in a chair facing the corner of a room “for weeks.” He also indicates that food might be withheld, saying students “have to be free of anything, any distraction, like food to TV, radio.” To get better, he insists, “They need to feel hopeless and feel depression and complete failure.” […]

    Democratic Rep. Katherine Clark said of DeSisto School and Babeu:

    “It was really just a cesspool of really horrendous practices towards children. I think it’s rather appalling to think that he is overseeing people with badges and guns, and that he thinks he is fit to run for Congress.” […]

    “It was ritualistic child abuse—a sort of lord of the flies situation, where some of the children were groomed into positions of disciplining other children, including some really egregious things like students strip searching other students when they arrived at the school.”

    Babeu worked on the Mitt Romney campaign, and on the John McCain campaign.

  22. says

    Bette Midler tweeted a photo of Donald Trump, with this caption:

    “It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.” — Joseph Heller, Catch 22

  23. says

    Republican Congress Critters have found a new way to insult President Obama.

    The Obama administration has prepared a new budget proposal, which was supposed to be presented to the Senate and House Budget Committees tomorrow, (during traditional budget week). The chairmen of those two committees refused to invite Shaun Donovan, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, to speak about the Obama plan.

    “Rather than spend time on a proposal that, if anything like this administration’s previous budgets, will double down on the same failed policies that have led to the worst economic recovery in modern times, Congress should continue our work on building a budget that balances and that will foster a healthy economy,” Mr. Price [Representative Tom Price of Georgia] said in a statement.

    Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, called the decision an insult and said it was representative of the “corrosive radicalism that has gripped congressional Republicans.” White House officials said it raised doubts about the frequent Republican leadership claims to restore “regular order” in Congress.

    http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/08/congress-declines-to-hear-obamas-budget-proposal-in-person/

    The end result will be more obstructionism on the part of Congress.

  24. says

    Tonight’s Rachel Maddow show will include an interview with Hillary Clinton.

    In international news, the United Arab Emirates joined Saudi Arabia is saying that they are ready to send ground troops to Syria to fight ISIS.

  25. says

    Jeb Bush made a strange announcement about the Supreme Court ruling on Citizens United. That’s the ruling that really made “Super PACs” popular as a way to finance campaigns. Jeb is supported by the Super PAC “Right to Rise,” which has raised more than a $100 million for him.

    But Jeb said today that he would “eliminate” (strange word choice) the Citizens United ruling.

    If I could do it all again I’d eliminate the Supreme Court ruling. This is a ridiculous system we have now where you have campaigns that struggle to raise money directly and they can’t be held accountable for the spending of the super PAC that’s their affiliate.

  26. says

    Former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is still considering entering the race for president.

    I find the level of discourse and discussion distressingly banal and an outrage and an insult to the voters.

    The quote is from an interview in the Financial Times.

    If he runs, Bloomberg plans to run on a third party ticket.

  27. says

    Transphobia is on public display in the South Dakota legislature.

    […] Reps. Jim Stalzer (R), Mark Willadsen (R) Steven Haugaard (R), and Arch Beal (R); and Sen. David Omdahl (R) all defended their support for HB 1008, a bill that bans transgender students from using school bathrooms that match their gender, which passed the House 58-10. […]

    Of course they are all Republicans.

    Rep. Stalzer offered the familiar myth that “people with male anatomy going into female showers and locker rooms” is somehow a threat to other women. Defining individuals entirely by their anatomy, he suggested that transgender women are basically all male exhibitionists. “I think we’re protecting the young women in our South Dakota high schools,” he said. “It is already a crime for a male to expose themselves in front of females, and they can call it she, he, whatever, but as long as they have male anatomy, they’re in violation of that law if nothing else.”

    Rep. Willadsen […] explained, “If you’re a boy, you go in the boys’ room; if you’re a girl, you go in the girls’ room.” […]

    Sen. Omdahl praised the bill because it’s about “protecting our children.” In a comment that elicited audible gasps from the audience, he said, “I’m sorry if you’re so twisted you don’t know who you are — a lot of people are — and I’m telling you right now, it’s about protecting the kids.” Implying that transgender people are mentally ill, he then said, “They’re treating the wrong part of the anatomy; they ought to be treating it up here,” gesturing to his head. […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2016/02/08/3747263/south-dakota-transphobia-on-parade/

  28. says

    This is a followup to comment 27. This makes Jeb Bush’s strange statement about eliminating Citizens United more understandable.

    […]Bush’s solution, however, is not to cut off unlimited funds from wealthy donors, it’s simply to allow them to give directly to candidates. As Bush told CNN, he would take the current system of unregulated donations to outside groups and regulated donations to campaigns and “turn that on its head if I could.” […]

    In other words, he wants all those billionaires contributing to his Super Pac to give the money directly to him instead. He wants to do away with the pesky $2,700 limit on individual contributions to his campaign.

    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/02/08/3747327/jeb-bush-citizens-united/

  29. treefrogdundee says

    Since going after the Republicans still standing would be like shooting fish in a barrel, another topic: What in the name of Hades went through Madeleine Albright and Gloria Steinem’s minds to make them open their mouths?! Thank you, you two, for reminding me why I refuse to vote for that entitled corporate shill Hillary if (and probably when) she gets the nomination. I don’t know what rock you live under but insulting and threatening the voters – especially when there is a candidate we actually like – is not a good way to endear us to you.

  30. anchor says

    I particularly marveled at the elegant and presidentially-competent manner in which they were all introduced to the debate.

    Made me feel all warm and heart-palpitatingly squishy deep inside. Those Republicans certainly have that knack of following along the lines of a Frank Capra sort of celebration of American Know How.

    After that it was beyond description.

  31. says

    A followup to comment 31.

    Madeleine Albright used one the catchphrases she has used for decades, and she used it in the wrong setting. It was a stupid and clueless move.

    Gloria Steinem just said something stupid, and then did not apologize properly.

    Both of them did Hillary Clinton no favors. But neither one of those women is Hillary Clinton. She is not them. The “entitled corporate shill Hillary” sounds like oversimplification to me.

    Madeleine Albright said:

    We can tell our story of how we climbed the ladder, and a lot of you younger women think it’s done. [referencing the fight for equality] It’s not done. There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other!

    That kind of threat was completely out of place in a presidential campaign. It had the unfortunate effect of insinuating that young women should vote for Clinton because she is a woman. Wrong idea. Wrong tone. Cluelessness when it came to where she was when she chose to repeat her favorite catchphrase, one that has been memorialized on Starbucks coffee cups.

    Gloria Steinem said:

    When you’re young, you’re thinking: “Where are the boys? The boys are with Bernie.”

    Oh, FFS, Gloria. Really? Gloria is 81 years old. Maybe she still has not gotten over the way things were when she was a girl. The idea that young women will choose a candidate based on what young men are choosing is an insult to young women.

    Here’s Steinem’s apology:

    In a case of talk-show Interruptus, I misspoke on the Bill Maher show recently, and apologize for what’s been misinterpreted as implying young women aren’t serious in their politics. Whether they gravitate to Bernie or Hillary, young women are activist and feminist in greater numbers than ever before.

    Yeah, yeah. That’s almost a not-pology. And you did some damage.

    Those two elderly women rebuked young women voters. Yuck. Offensive.

  32. treefrogdundee says

    Well put Lynna. But looming larger than Albright and Steinem’s words (and their non-apologies) was Clinton’s equally absent reaction (“We’re getting offended by everything these days”) which bordered on being annoyed she even had to address this. This is emblematic of Clinton: that is, someone who sees the White House as her birthright, the election as a mere formality, and the votes as due to her. It is this overwhelming arrogance – coupled with her previous and/or current positions on everything from Iraq to same sex rights to banking – that make it clear she has no intention of making decisions based on the interest of the people or the country and frankly make her just as frightening as most of the current Republican crop. I have no intention of voting for her even as the lesser of two evils.

    On another note the “special place in hell” remark, no matter when or against whom it was used, is condescending and insulting in its very nature. I disagree with nearly everything the current Republican crop stands for but for me to proclaim such a line against anyone who might vote for one in November would be childish and pathetic. Would a vote for, lets say Jeb, be short-sighted? Yes. Misguided? Yup. Not in the people’s best interest? I would say so. But its that rigid “with us or against us” mentality that is a disgusting feature of both the hard right and the hard left whenever it appears.

  33. tomh says

    I have no intention of voting for her even as the lesser of two evils.

    In other words, you’ll be voting for the greater of two evils, which, of course, is the practical effect of not voting, or voting for a third party. You truly don’t see any difference in the two parties?

    I disagree with nearly everything the current Republican crop stands for

    If I might ask, what is it that the Republicans stand for that you agree with?

  34. anchor says

    Thank you Lynna for that wealth of information! The work behind it is evident and a model of how it is done, of how far one can go in the digging. It is truly an inspiration!

  35. johnx says

    Cruz also came out in favor of waterboarding, as did Trump, with Trump adding that he would use interrogation techniques worse than waterboarding.

    That these war crimes are today considered acceptable, even honorable, in the RNC debate is partially due to Obama administration not prosecuting the tortures from the Bush administration.

  36. says

    Donald Trump repeated a misogynistic slur last night:

    In context, the Republican frontrunner was complaining about Ted Cruz not being enthusiastic enough in his support for torture.

    “You know he’s concerned about the answer because well, some people,” Trump said pointing to a woman in the crowd, “she just said a terrible thing. You know what she said? Shout it out ’cause I don’t wanna.”

    Then he said it anyway: “She said, ‘He’s a p—y.'”

    Yes, Trump encouraged someone else to say “pu_sy” first so that he had an excuse to repeat it into the microphone.
    MSNBC link.

  37. Hoosier X says

    I’m the father of two little girls … They are capable of doing anything in their heart’s desire. But the idea that their government would forcibly put them in a foxhole with a 220-pound psychopath trying to kill them doesn’t make any sense at all.

    Um, Senator Cruz? Question. Exactly who in the government is trying to put your little girls into a foxhole with a 220-pound psychopath trying to kill them?
    I see a psychopath using your little girls for some crass and rather transparent pandering, but it’s not the government.

  38. says

    In an interview with Hillary Clinton, Rachel Maddow draws her out on the “bernie bros” without actually mentioning them. Clinton also doesn’t mention the “clit-trash” etc. insults aimed at people who support her, but she alludes to them indirectly. Maddow makes the point that she doesn’t seem to get the really nasty comments, though some are pretty aggressive.

    The video starts with with a question about the state of the race, about a rumored “shake up” in campaign staff, etc. This part of the interview is 9:51 minutes long. Link to interview. Other subjects like Dodd-Frank, donations from hedge funds guys, etc. are covered. Clinton made some good points about the powerful groups she stood up to. More detail on that would have made those points better.

    This interview was done at the end of a long day in which Clinton had visited Flint, Michigan to help organize the help that is needed there. Here is the interview that covered the Flint, Michigan toxic water crisis.

    We sometimes focus on the heated language between the Sanders and Clinton campaigns, but the rhetoric coming from the Republican side is far more heated, much less based on facts, and more relentless. Here is an interview in which Hillary Clinton discusses with Rachel Maddow “the residual effect of years of Republican attacks is that many voters have a general feeling of distrust, and how she plans to address that in her campaign.” Interesting interview. In many ways, there’s a general point here about how rightwing repetition of myths and slurs causes that crap to stick to all Democratic candidates, not just Clinton.

  39. says

    This is a followup to comment 38.

    More coverage of Donald Trump’s use of a misogynistic slur:

    Donald Trump faux-admonished and then repeated a woman who called Ted Cruz a “pussy” at a rally here on Monday night.
    Trump was criticizing Cruz for, in his view, failing to offer unequivocal support for waterboarding in the debate on Saturday night. Trump then interrupted what he was saying to point out what a woman in the crowd had shouted.

    “She just said a terrible thing,” Trump said. “You know what she said? Shout it out because I don’t want to—OK, you’re not allowed to say, and I never expect to hear that from you again. She said—I never expect to hear that from you again!

    She said he’s a pussy. That’s terrible. Terrible,” Trump said, throwing up his hands. […]

    A few people near BuzzFeed News at the event started chanting, “Pussy! Pussy!” after Trump said this.

    Trump was both glorying in the moment on morning TV talk shows, and at the same time defending himself:

    He made the morning show rounds, telling hosts that he wasn’t calling Ted Cruz a pussy, just repeating what that woman said, “like a retweet.” It was also, he said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” just “a great moment. […] I got a standing ovation, the place went wild. Somebody said mixed cheers. Let me tell you the place went wild,” Trump said.

    He also dropped in a quick mention of Hillary Clinton, who he says is “evil.”

    Link.

  40. says

    Here’s your almost-daily update on the Bundy militants occupying the wildlife refuge in Oregon.

    There are only four of them left. One is David Fry, a tech guy. Thanks to him we have new crazy videos to watch.

    The four people remaining in an armed standoff at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge have found a way around the FBI’s block on cell phone and WIFI service. For the last week they’ve only had one working phone, which was provided by FBI. But, the militants self-described tech guy, David Fry, found a way around the communications block and uploaded a series of videos yesterday.

    One video shows David Fry’s reaction after finding out that all four militants have been named in the federal indictment released by a grand jury last week. To say he’s upset about the pending felony charge is an understatement. In the video below, he tells the FBI to stick the charges “where the sun don’t shine” and then shows himself defiantly breaking even more federal laws.

    In another video, Fry rambles around topics, from abortion to Obama coming to take people’s guns to the removal of the Confederate flag, ending with a call to ‘patriots’ to rise up. It was a buffet of rightwing talking points and conspiracies. He hinted that supplies may be starting to run low and calls the newfound ability to post videos a “miracle.” […]

    Daily Kos link.

    Partial transcript on Twitter of the audio from one video.

    […] They also discuss finding LaVoy Finicum’s Mormon Bible inside the refuge, which they see as yet another sign from God. […]

  41. says

    It looks like Bernie Sanders is going to rack up a big win in New Hampshire. All of the poll results are not in yet, of course. I’ll update this later.

    In other news, one of Trump’s sons, Trump Jr., whined a bit to reporters:

    “Now, listen, in this country I’m the son of a billionaire, I can’t even have an opinion anymore,” he said on Breitbart News Daily, according to audio published by Buzzfeed News. “I could be Albert Einstein and they would discredit me as a horrible scientist. It doesn’t matter.”

    Link

  42. treefrogdundee says

    “In other words, you’ll be voting for the greater of two evils, which, of course, is the practical effect of not voting, or voting for a third party.”

    That is a similar logic to the creationist creed that atheism is a religion. The absence of support for A does not equate to support for B. Regardless of who might be functionally worse in office, not casting a vote has the actual effect of saying ‘I support neither of you’ and forces the party in the future to run someone who does stand for the voters. Many elections have been decided not because of the support one candidate had but because of the lack of support for his opponent.

    “You truly don’t see any difference in the two parties?”

    I see an enormous difference between the two parties with the GOP wanting to take us back to the social glory days of the 1950s. But that still doesn’t change the fact that Hillary has some extremely troubling stances on some very important issues. Regardless of the risk of getting a Republican elected, if I cast my vote for Hillary and she wins, I will have to live with myself knowing that I helped in facilitating the next war she starts or the next step on the road to corporate serfdom.

    “If I might ask, what is it that the Republicans stand for that you agree with?”

    Fair point. I can’t think of a thing. Maybe I was reminiscing for the old days when there were one or two of them who DIDN’T think they were running for Grand Inquisitor.

  43. dianne says

    I see an enormous difference between the two parties with the GOP wanting to take us back to the social glory days of the 1950s.

    If they were only trying to take us back to the 1950s, I’d be relatively happy. But they, especially Trump, seem to be going for more like the late 1930s in Germany. That’s…a problem. A few years ago (actually, quite a few years ago now), there was an election in Louisiana between the ex-head of the KKK and another guy. Other guy was a crook-indited and convicted. The unofficial slogan of his campaign was “Vote for the crook! It’s important.” Same here. Vote for the corporate stooge (if she gets nominated). It’s important.

  44. says

    This is a followup to comment 11.

    The Daily Show presented a segment in which Jessica Williams, “Senior Beyonce Correspondent,” defended the Super Bowl halftime show. Link. Scroll down for video.

  45. tomh says

    not casting a vote has the actual effect of saying ‘I support neither of you’ and forces the party in the future to run someone who does stand for the voters.

    Complete nonsense. Not voting has no “actual effect” at all, and certainly doesn’t force the party to do anything. The practical effect of voting for a Democrat is that it cancels out a Republican vote. Not voting at all allows the Republican vote to count.

  46. says

    For some time now Donald Trump has been saying “there’s something we don’t know about” in reference to President Obama. Without specifying the “something,” Trump was dog-whistling to right-wingers that Obama is a Muslim and/or a terrorist sympathizer.

    Trump defined the “something,” sort of, during an interview with über rightwing radio host Michael Savage.

    “It’s radical Islamic terrorism,” Trump said. “We have a president that won’t even use the words and if you don’t use the words, you’re never going to get rid of the problem. We have a — maybe he doesn’t want to get rid of the problem. I don’t know exactly what’s going on.” […]

    Right Wing Watch link.

    That’s as close as Trump has come to saying that President Obama may be a terrorist sympathizer. Trump keeps repeating that utter crap, and edging closer to libel all the time. There are already rightwing factions that call for Obama to be tried for treason. These tactics are dangerous and stupid.

  47. says

    Shock jock, Alex Jones, is aiming an increasingly vile stream of invective at Bernie Sanders.

    Last week, InfoWars broadcaster Alex Jones went into yet another rant about Bernie Sanders, alleging that the Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate “wants us to live under the heavenly socialist-communist system like China.”

    He said that Sanders’ campaign is catching on because “stupid, snot-nosed, crud” liberals adore Mao Zedong while they “live off the backs of everybody that fought Nazism and communism.”

    “You need to have your jaws broken,” Jones said. “But don’t you worry, reality is going to crash in on you trash who lowered our defenses, who brought the republic down. Oh, we’re already gone and you celebrate it like you’ve joined the globalists, mounting America’s head on the wall, your great victory.”

    Jones then depicted Sanders and his “pathetic scum” supporters as mentally disabled, before arguing that Sanders voters are “the ultimate chumps, the ultimate buffoons, the ultimate schmucks” who will “burn in the camps.”

    Right Wing Watch link.

    The call for physical violence, “You need to have your jaws broken,” is especially despicable.

  48. says

    Republican state legislators keep doing this: mandating drug testing for welfare recipients. It never works. The scheme failed in Florida and other states. There are always few positive tests. The testing is expensive, and insulting to welfare recipients. The testing always disproves a favorite rightwing myth that most welfare recipients abuse drugs.

    So what did Tennessee legislators do? They mandated drug testing and now they are in denial.

    A year and a half after it started spending money and time to screen welfare applicants for drug use, Tennessee still hasn’t found many poor people who are “getting all potted up on weed“.

    Out of 39,121 people who have applied for Families First in Tennessee benefits since the state instituted drug tests in mid-2014, just 65 have tested positive for narcotics. […]

    If the state’s drug screening questionnaire is as effective at gauging risk as the state thinks it is, then its two-layered testing system has revealed that just 0.2 percent of welfare applicants can’t pass a drug test.

    The state has paid $23,592 to analyze the urine of that sliver of its poorest citizenship. The total costs of the testing program are likely even higher than that figure, which does not account for the cost of staff time spent administering the quixotic policy. Families First benefits average about $165 per month, according to the Nashville Tennesseean. […]

    “It’s a good investment that those who receive support at the largesse of taxpayers should not be using it to fund illegal activities.” [said Rep. Glen Casada, a Republican doofus]

    Such hidebound support for policies that reinforce stereotypes about the poor is relatively common among politicians. Doctors, however, say that it’s a foolish misconception. Making anti-poverty programs contingent on drug testing “further entrench[es] the stigma which erroneously links drug addiction with economic need,” according to the canadian Centre of Addiction and Mental Health.

    At 9.4 percent, Americans’ overall drug usage rate is far higher than that uncovered among welfare applicants in any of the several states that have adopted Tennessee-style programs.

    The drug stereotype is an extreme manifestation of the broader misunderstanding of what life is really like in poverty. Political rhetoric about poor folks living well off of working-class generosity aside, the reality is that poor families spend much more of their income on essentials and much less on luxuries than their richer counterparts.

    Think Progress link.

    We should drug-test Republican legislators when they apply for a small business loan. Let’s also drug-test every pastor, bishop, and preacher since they are receiving a lot of taxpayer support.

    Republican legislators also proved that, yes, they are for big, wasteful government if it means they can get their jollies by harassing poor people.

  49. treefrogdundee says

    “Not voting has no “actual effect” at all, and certainly doesn’t force the party to do anything”

    I disagree. The main consideration of a party when picking a nominee is who can get elected (Doing what they are told is another, which is why Bernie isn’t the clear front-runner). Why do you think some of the more mottled feathers on the Republican’s lunatic wing are causing such consternation among the GOP brass? If they do go down the road of selecting one of their true fire-breathers and they get trashed by Bernie or Hillary in November it would almost certainly spell the end of the Tea Party because no political party can survive an unbroken line of failures. This would force the Republicans to at least pay lip service to moderate voters. Not that this would miraculously create a warm and fuzzy feeling for me, but its a start.

    Hillary was disastrously wrong on Iraq and I frankly think she would be the most likely of any candidate to start another war. She would continue or enhance many of the most onerous anti-terror laws that have turned this country into a police-state. She was wrong on same sex rights with her stance moving coldly and in complete tandem to national polls (had those not changed she would still be a proud supporter of “traditional marriage”). She can cuddle up to corporate interests with the best of them, Trump included. I see zero chance of her tackling race relations and not much more concerning immigration. She would be a clear choice for women’s rights and education. But those alone aren’t close to enough for me to overlook everything else. Sorry, but I refuse to vote for her.

  50. says

    Uh, Marco Robot, you should not be proud of those ratings:

    […] Rubio responded by touting his perfect voting scores from groups such as National Right to Life Committee, the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity, the corporate lobbying group National Federation for Independent Business, the National Rifle Association and the Family Research Council.

    The Family Research Council has been designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center for its extreme stances on homosexuality, including its leaders’ defense of Uganda’s “kill-the-gays” bill and call for the U.S. to “export” gay people. […]

    Link

  51. says

    Oh, look, a guy who wants to PZ’s book—well, not PZ’s book specifically, but all books written by atheists:

    In his latest video, Catholic supremacist and extremist anti-gay activist Theodore Shoebat called for an end to the freedom of religion in America and for books written by atheists to be burned.

    Only “idiots” and “morons” support the freedom of religion, Shoebat declared, adding that the government should not be “giving freedom to those who say there is no God.”

    “Atheism should not be allowed,” he said. “Richard Dawkins’ books? Burn ’em all. Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, all these books, burn ’em. They shouldn’t be allowed. They’re absolutely dangerous.”

    “Anti-Christian” views “should not be allowed in society,” Shoebat said, because they are “dangerous” and “demonic” and so allowing them to exist in the name of freedom of religion only leads to abortion, misery and violence.

    “That’s what atheism leads to,” he said. “A giant mountain of skulls and dead people.” […]

    Link

  52. tomh says

    Sorry, but I refuse to vote for her.

    Well, if enough people agree with you, we’ll all get to enjoy a Trump, or Cruz, or Rubio presidency. By not voting, you seem to be trying to send the message that a Democratic candidate who is too conservative won’t get elected. Sorry, that’s a little too subtle. The message is the opposite, the candidate has to be more conservative to get elected.

  53. says

    We’ve been following a bill proposed in the Utah state legislature that would legalize medical marijuana. Mormon leaders weighed in against the bill, and now some votes have been lost.

    At least one and possibly two senators have abandoned their support of a medical-marijuana bill pending in the Utah Legislature after the LDS Church issued a statement opposing the measure.

    The measure’s sponsor, Sen. Mark Madsen, R-Saratoga Springs, said his colleagues’ change of heart is a blow to his effort to make Utah the 24th state to legalize medical cannabis, but he hopes there is still time to make the case to senators that the bill is worth passing. […]

    Representatives of the state’s predominant faith had met with Madsen and legislative leaders earlier in the session to voice their concerns and opposition to the bill privately. About 60 percent of Utahns and the vast majority of the 104 legislators are Mormons. […]

    Salt Lake Tribune link.

  54. says

    Finally, some good news for voting rights. This only affects one state, but it is still a step in the right direction.

    After a long fight, 40,000 people in Maryland just got the right to vote.

    The Maryland Senate voted to override Governor Hogan’s veto and allow people with felony convictions to register to vote after they have been released from prison. Until now, registration was prohibited until after parole or probation had been completed.

    The vote was close— In Maryland, a veto needs three-fifths of both legislative bodies, meaning 29 senators would have to vote in favor. The vote came down to the wire, with exactly 29 votes to override. The House voted to override the bill last month. […]

    Link

  55. says

    Uh oh. It looks like President Obama may have some competition when it comes to being crowned by rightwingers as the Antichrist. Maybe Beyoncé will win that contest?

    Conservative radio host Sandy Rios joined in on the conservative outrage over Beyoncé’s Super Bowl halftime show performance and “Formation” music video earlier today, calling the singer an anti-white racist whose “lawlessness” could bring about the End Times reign of the Antichrist. […]

    “This video that they have produced and released just before the Super Bowl, I guess the song she performed, it’s called ‘Formation,’ I watched it, it’s just disgusting to me,” Rios said. “It’s not only stoking the fires of racism, just stoking hatred, black hatred towards whites and towards policemen, it’s also just crass sexually. It’s like you need a bath. What is this beautiful girl doing, doing this?” […]

    “It’s just in-your-face black racism,” she said. “And also cop hatred.” […]

    Link

  56. says

    In New Hampshire Marco Robot encountered a voter who is gay. Timothy Kierstead did not cut Marco Robot any slack:

    “Why do you want to put me back in the closet?” Kierstead demanded.

    “I don’t,” Rubio responded. “You can live any way you want. I just believe marriage is between one man and one woman.”

    Kierstead told Rubio that he had been married for “a long time.” He then asserted that, by arguing vehemently for the rollback of marriage rights of gay couples, Rubio was trying “to say we don’t matter.”

    “No, I just believe marriage is between one man and one woman,” Rubio said again. “I think that’s what the law should be. And if you disagree, you should have the law changed by a legislature.”

    Rubio patted Kierstead on the shoulder, telling him “I respect your view,” then walked away.

    “Typical politician,” Kierstead said loudly as Rubio shuffled off. “Walk away!” […]

    Way to repeat yourself Mr. Robot. And way to highlight your ignorance. New Hampshire passed a law to allow same-sex marriage in 2009.

  57. unclefrogy says

    @54
    it does not matter how many votes are cast, the winner is the one who gets the most of the votes that are cast. Any strategy that suppresses the vote of the opposing side is a positive for your side. One of the most important things you can do to win an election is to get your supporters to the polls better than your opposition.
    So your strategy is to advocate in effect to just forfeit the election and further would lead to dropping out of the political sphere all together
    hows it go all that is needed for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.
    uncle frogy

  58. says

    What the heck? How clueless do you have to be say this:

    “We have a full-blown assault on the First Amendment,” she [Katrina Pierson, spokesperson for Trump] said. “Donald Trump has single-handedly brought back freedom of speech. Yes, he did repeat what a voter said, but this is also the ‘leave free or die’ state.” […]

    At a packed rally on Monday night, Trump repeated the words of a member of the audience who called Cruz “a pussy” for his opposition to legalizing waterboarding, which Trump supported at Saturday’s Republican presidential debate.

    Trump defended using the vulgar word, saying that rally participants “were all just having fun.” He told Fox News that calling Cruz a pussy after a supporter did so was the equivalent of a retweet.

    “This is where your rights are really important to you as an individual,” Pierson said on CNN. “The fact that Donald Trump is out there saying what he thinks and means is important.”

    “He’s not testing messages like so many other candidates are. He’s just being himself with voters,” she added. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/katrina-pierson-trump-pussy-comments-brought-back-freedom-of-speech

  59. treefrogdundee says

    Frogy, I understand your feeling but the fact remains that choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil. My problem with Hillary is not a matter of one or two relatively minor disagreements. She would truly be a horrible and dangerous person to have in the White House. The fact that the same is true of the Republican field doesn’t change it. In regards to “good men doing nothing”, you can just as easily say that acquiescing to support a candidate whom you consider dangerous merely because of who their opponent is is very much ‘doing nothing’. The way we change the world is if we see harm, we step up and confront it rather than sighing and saying “It could be worse”. This black-and-white view of politics is one of the more distressing aspects of our country today.

  60. says

    U.S. District Court Judge David Godbey of Dallas said “No” to Texas officials who thought they could refuse to let Syrian refugees resettle in their state.

    The executive branch of the federal government handles the process of resettling refugees, not the states.

    MSNBC link.

  61. says

    Governor Paul LePage of Maine is always good for a few eyebrow-raising moments of disbelief. He’s the guy that recently accused black drug dealers of coming into Maine from other states to rape white girls.

    Now he has decided to rail against “socialists,” in writing.

    […] LePage on Monday took the unusual step of issuing a written State of the State address, using it to rail against “socialist politicians” […] He accused legislators of importing a “foreign socialist ideology” and vowed to campaign for his policies until Mainers select a new Legislature in November.

    […] Not once did he use the word “Democrats” in his letter. Meanwhile, he used some iteration of the word “socialist” a dozen times. […]

    “Politicians are supposed to represent the Maine people, not special interests, not lobbyists and not a foreign socialist ideology,” LePage wrote. […]

    Democratic leaders in the Legislature retorted that LePage squandered an opportunity to lay out a vision for the state, opting to electioneer rather than govern.

    “He could have shared a blueprint for our economy, but instead he gave us an unproductive rant about socialism as if we never won the Cold War,” Senate Minority Leader Justin Alfond, D-Portland, said in a written statement. […]

    LePage […] also accused “socialist politicians” of dragging his administration through a “kangaroo court” aimed at impeaching him. […]

    Most of the policy initiatives outlined in the letter – such as lowering Maine’s personal income tax to 4 percent as a starting point toward a zero-tax state, drug-testing welfare recipients and importing Canadian hydropower – are issues that LePage has been pursuing unsuccessfully for years. The Maine Republican Party failed to collect enough signatures to place a referendum on tax cuts and welfare reform on the November 2016 ballot. […]

    The tone of the letter and the fact that it was delivered in writing, rather than in person, underscores the governor’s contentious relations with state lawmakers […]. His repeated references to socialism also reflect a national trend in the country’s political dialogue as Republicans increasingly portray President Obama and Democrats as socialists attempting to carry out an ideology harmful to the country.

    “First, it was liberal ideology. Now it’s socialism,” LePage wrote. “The steadfast adherence to ideology above all else, including prosperity for the Maine people, has prevented opportunities for our state to succeed and grow.” […]

    Portland Press Herald link.

    Governor LePage has taken up permanent residence in LaLa Land.

  62. says

    Slime balls joined together in order to be more slimy:

    White nationalists, including a former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard, praised National Rifle Association board member Ted Nugent for posting an anti-Semitic image to his Facebook page, claiming Nugent had “the courage” to tell “the truth,” lauding the fact that Nugent “appears to have doubled-down” on his anti-Semitism, and celebrating that a large audience was exposed to anti-Semitism by Nugent.

    The “truth” Nugent told was that Jews are responsible for gun control. In doing so, Nugent highlighted former New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg; as well as Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Charles Schumer and other politicians.

    Media Matters link.

  63. says

    The way the Republican Party grants delegates to presidential candidates greatly favors front runners. In this case, it favors Donald Trump.

    The state party awards delegates on a proportional basis to presidential candidates based on their vote statewide and by congressional district. But it also has a 10 percent threshold. What does that mean? It means that if a candidate does not get 10 percent of the vote, he gets no delegates. (And this is a hard threshold — no rounding.) What’s more, not only do those underperforming candidates get no delegates, but whatever delegates they could have gotten based on their vote share go to the winner of the primary.

    NRP link.

    There are so many other GOP candidates vying for second to fifth place in New Hampshire that they are likely to split the non-Trump vote, which means that a lot of votes for those other candidates will end up in Trump’s win column anyway.

  64. says

    Depressing news: according to New Hampshire exit polls, two thirds of Republican voters agree that Muslims should be banned from entering the USA.

  65. treefrogdundee says

    On another note, it has just been pointed out to me that Donald Trump and Martin Shkreli share the exact same arrogant, sniveling smirk… the kind that makes you want to remove it with a cheese grater. Coincidence or long-lost offspring? Discuss.

  66. says

    We don’t have all the results in yet, but the projected winners in New Hampshire are Donald Trump for the Republicans; and Bernie Sanders for the Democrats.

    If you are looking for sort of good news, Trump won with about 1/3 of the Republican votes, with the rest of the votes spread out among the other candidates. It looks like Kasich will get second place.

    The Democratic race was closer. It’s a decisive win for Sanders, but Clinton will come away with 40%+ of the vote. It looks to me like Sanders and Clinton will both go to Nevada and South Carolina in good shape.

  67. says

    microraptor @72, you are correct. Nugent worked for the Mitt Romney campaign, and during that campaign he said, “If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will be either be dead or in jail by this time next year.”

    Promises, promises.

  68. MassMomentumEnergy says

    Two big firsts for the New Hampshire primaries:

    * it was the first time in American history a non-Christian (and likely agnostic/atheist) won a presidential primary.

    * it was the first time a non-incumbent won a primary with 60% of the vote.

    One of the most interesting data points for me is that Bernie and Hillary split the registered Democrat vote 50/50, but Bernie walked away with something like 75% of the independent vote.

    Who is more electable in the general now?

  69. tomh says

    Who is more electable in the general now?

    I guess it depends if you think New Hampshire is representative of the entire country or not.

  70. MassMomentumEnergy says

    The people who Bernie was able to sway in great numbers in New Hampshire are the kind of people needed to win against the Republicans.

    Hillary will lose these demographics badly in the general.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanderss-oddball-coalition-savors-its-improbable-then-inevitable-victory/2016/02/09/86503a92-cf64-11e5-b2bc-988409ee911b_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-banner-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

    That is not who wins this state. New Hampshire Democrats had, in the past, rewarded the budget-balancing sobriety of Sen. Paul Tsongas, the stay-the-course neoliberalism of Al Gore, the “ready on Day One” safety of, yes, Hillary Clinton. Some of the people cheering for Sanders, such as 63-year old Peri Stockinger, had once organized for Eugene McCarthy. And even he lost New Hampshire.

  71. says

    Donald Trump gave a WTF acceptance speech.
    Rolling Stone link.

    At the start of the speech, Trump sounded like he was accepting an Academy Award:

    So I want to thank everybody. But I really have to begin by paying homage to my parents, Mary and Fred. They are up there. They are looking down. They’re saying, this is something very special. They love this country, and they’re very happy right now. So thank you to my parents.

    I want to thank my sister, Judge Barry, Maryanne, a really great sister, another great sister, Elizabeth. My fantastic brother, Robert, who is watching right now with Ann Marie (ph), and I want to thank my brother, my late brother, Fred, what a fantastic guy. I learned so much from Fred. Taught me more than just about anybody. Just probably about even with my father, a fantastic guy. So I want to thank Fred. He’s up there and he’s looking down also. […]

    Washington Post link.

    There was more in that vein, including thanks to his wife, to Don and Vanessa, to Ivanka, and to a real estate developer named Jared. Oh, yeah, and to Lara, Eric, Hope and Corey

  72. says

    Correction to comment 74.

    When the final New Hampshire results were in, Sanders got 60% of the vote (146,321); and Clinton got 38% (92,898). The two candidates are still close when it comes to DNC convention delegates. When you add Iowa and NH together, Sanders has 15 delegates and Clinton has 14.

    In the GOP race, Trump came away with 35% of the vote. Kasich is in second place with 16%; Cruz in 3rd with 12%; Jeb Bush in 4th with 11%; and Marco Rubio in 5th with 11%. Christie got 7% and Fiorina got 4%; Ben carson, etc. were all in the 2% to 0% range.

    http://nhpr.org/post/2016-presidential-primary-results

  73. says

    Winning in New Hampshire seems to have prompted Trump to make more outrageous comments on morning media outlets, including a policy to assassinate Kim Jong Un:

    “I would get China to make that guy disappear in one form or another very quickly,” Trump said on “CBS This Morning.” He didn’t clarify whether disappearing was equivalent to being assassinated but said, “Well, I’ve heard of worse things, frankly.”

    Worse than Dick Cheney?

  74. tomh says

    @ #80

    Hillary will lose these demographics badly in the general.

    These Sanders supporters will vote for Trump? Sounds unlikely.

  75. MassMomentumEnergy says

    These Sanders supporters will vote for Trump? Sounds unlikely.

    You’d be amazed at how many people in NH had a hard time picking which ballot to pick so they could vote either Trump or Sanders. The average swing voter is watching their lifestyle slowly change from lower-middle-class to straight up poor, and only Trump and Sanders are speaking to that fear and anger.

    Then you have all the disenchanted liberal voters that usually don’t vote, but would trek to the polls for Bernie. Something they will never do for Hillary.

  76. says

    One of the pillars of the argument for Sanders’ electability is that his campaign is so inspiring that it will bring new voters and new coalitions of voters out of the woodwork. Maybe. Supporters of Sanders can hope for that, and they are working toward achieving that.

    A reality check, it hasn’t happened yet … at least not to the degree that is being hyped in the media, and certainly not to the degree that is being hyped by Sanders’ supporters.

    I prefer to be realistic, which includes knowing that Sanders still has work to do. Counting Hillary Clinton out too soon would be a mistake.

    […] In last week’s Iowa caucuses, turnout was good in the Democratic race, but it dropped when compared to 2008, the last competitive Democratic nominating fight. (Republicans, however, saw turnout increase this year to a new, record high.)

    In yesterday’s New Hampshire primary, turnout was again strong, and with nearly all of the precincts reporting, it looks like about 239,000 voters participated in the Democratic primary. But again, in the party’s the last nominating contest, nearly 288,000 voters turned out, which means we’ve seen another drop. (Like Iowa, Republican turnout in New Hampshire yesterday broke the party’s record.)

    This is obviously just two nominating contests, and there will be many more to come. It’s entirely possible that Sanders-inspired turnout will start to appear in time.

    But Iowa and New Hampshire are arguably the two best states in the nation, other than Vermont, for Sanders. But that didn’t produce an increase in voter turnout. […]

    Link.

  77. says

    Clinton’s newest ad to address systemic racism in the criminal justice system.

    The Sanders connection to high-dollar donors: this article takes a look at some of the connections that Sanders has to lobbyists and large individual donors. It also quotes a Sanders rebuttal, and rebuttals by members of his staff.

    I don’t expect a Senator to function without some of these connections. I think a lot is being made of what is probably nothing, but it is a fact that both Sanders and Clinton have some connections to high-dollar donors. Doesn’t mean either one of them is “bought” nor that either one of them ever changed a vote thanks to those connections.

    There’s also the point to be made that Clinton donated some of her speaking fees to charitable foundations. Sanders did likewise with his much smaller fees.

  78. tomh says

    @ #88

    Strange but true.

    True is a relative term when you’re talking about a Washington Post opinion piece. The author found two people in New Hampshire who claimed they were deciding between Sanders and Trump, and extrapolated that into a nationwide phenomenon, in what looks like a desperate attempt to invent a startling theory and generate readership. It stretches “true” to the breaking point.

  79. says

    No Republican candidates have mentioned the water crisis in Flint, Michigan in any of their social media accounts. Would that be because a Republican Governor is in charge?

    microraptor @78: yes, Pat Buchanan won the New Hampshire primary in 1992, with 38% of the vote. Rachel Maddow made the point that Buchanan’s acceptance speech was almost all culture-war, and that it was depressing for gay people.

    In the both the Buchanan and Trump instances, we can console ourselves with the fact that almost 2/3 of the Republicans did NOT vote for the most dunderheaded candidate in the race.

  80. MassMomentumEnergy says

    *Shrug*

    I’ve met more than a couple Trump/Sanders undecideds in real life. It requires an odd mix of policy ignorance and trust in sketchy gut feelings, but the demographic is real, and every one I met in that demographic hates Clinton.

  81. says

    Someone emailed me to say that the link in comment 93 didn’t work.

    Here’s the ABC link to that speech.
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/hillary-clintons-speech-hampshire-loss-sanders-36823527

    Here’s the ABC link to Bernie Sander’s speech:
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/bernie-sanders-full-speech-hampshire-primary-36824671

    Here’s the link to John Kasich’s speech:
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/john-kasich-supporters-hampshire-36825739

  82. says

    This is bad news.

    The Internal Revenue Service has granted tax-exempt status to Crossroads GPS, a conservative group that has aggressively pioneered in a new form of political engagement by nonprofit groups sanctioned by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.

    The decision by the IRS — first reported by OpenSecrets.org, the website of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — means that Crossroads GPS has been deemed a “social welfare” nonprofit under Section 501(c)(4) of the tax code.

    Text is quoted from the Washington Post.

    Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS fundraising mechanism is notorious for secretly collecting unlimited funds (donor’s names are secret) and then using those funds not for “social welfare” but for campaign attack ads. That’s illegal, but Rove does it anyway. https://twitter.com/NormOrnstein/status/697104290322714625

  83. says

    Yay! Carly Fiorina has dropped out of the Republican race for president. One less lying liar to cover.

    Chris Christie is expected to drop out of the race, but he hasn’t made it official yet.

    In other news, Bernie Sanders’ win in NH prompted more donations to his campaign, about $2.6 million since last night. Might have been more, but his website crashed.

  84. says

    Republicans in the House and Senate are still refusing to even have President’s Obama’s new budget proposal presented to them.

    The budget looks pretty good to me:

    […] In his $4 trillion budget, Obama proposed investing $320 billion in “clean” public transportation initiatives over the next decade, in universal access to preschool and in food access programs for underprivileged kids. He also proposed raising the capital gains tax and imposing a new tax on crude oil, which are both political nonstarters for Republicans. Yet, the President also highlighted other spending priorities that GOP members of Congress would have a hard time railing against including a plan to spend $11 billion to fight the Islamic State, money to end veteran homelessness and a $1 billion investment in cancer research.[…]

    Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-CA)–one of only two black Democrats on the House’s budget committee–said in a statement to TPM that “the decision of Budget Committee Republicans to reject the President’s budget – sight unseen, without even a hearing – further shows that Congressional Republican are glued to their extremist, Tea Party agenda.”

    “It is clear from their budget proposals and actions that they have no interest in effectively governing or improving the lives of American families,” Lee said.

    But even from a practical standpoint, many say that entertaining the president’s budget plan even if it is considered to be aspirational is part of the process. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obama-budget-snubbed-by-congress

    The article includes quotes from former Republican staffers, all saying that the President’s budget should be reviewed. One Congresswoman said: “I fear the 114th Congress will now be remembered for its unprecedented disrespect toward our nation’s Commander In Chief and its embarrassing inability to govern.”

  85. says

    What the Republicans think about a potential third part run by Michael Bloomberg:

    […] “I don’t view it as a third party,” Priebus said. “I view it as another Democrat so you’ll have two Democrats running and splitting their vote. Look, he’s been fighting and pounding away at Republicans for how long now? He wants to tax slurpees and sodas. The guy is a liberal Democrat so great, if they want to have two Democrats run and split their vote and let us compete in places like Connecticut and New Hampshire and Maine—places we used to win 20 years ago—we’ll take it. Honestly it’s no skin off our back.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/priebus-bloomberg-2016-run

    So, yeah, all good new for the GOP, and very bad news for Democrats.

  86. says

    Republicans in the House of Congress are looking for another way to cut benefits that go to needy families.

    Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI) knows something about welfare. As an 18-year-old mother, she enrolled in what was at the time called Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) along with other social safety net programs that got her through and helped her rise out of poverty. “I was able to go and finish my education and training in order to become a taxpayer,” she said. “I was able to go to college. I have paid back the taxpayers tremendously for the help they gave me.”

    But she worries that even fewer people will be able to get that kind of leg up if Republicans get their way. Rep. Tom Price (R-GA), chairman of the House Committee on the Budget, has said that he and his fellow Republicans are leaning toward using the budget reconciliation process to reform the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), what became of AFDC after welfare reform enacted in the 1990s.

    Reconciliation would let them pass any revenue-neutral legislation with just 51 votes and avoid a potential Democratic filibuster while also skirting the typical way bills are considered and voted on. […]

    Think Progress link

  87. says

    This is a headline that is sort of misleading, but the article does cover an issue that MassMomentum brought up in comment 76: Bernie Sanders disappoints some atheists with his ‘very strong religious’ feelings.

    Presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders dashed the hopes of some atheists when he declared he had “very strong religious and spiritual feelings” at a Democratic town hall.

    “It’s a guiding principle in my life, absolutely, it is,” Sanders said Wednesday when a New Hampshire voter asked him about his faith. “Everybody practices religion in a different way. To me, I would not be here tonight, I would not be running for president of the United States, if I did not have very strong religious and spiritual feelings.”

    The statement came a week after the Vermont senator told The Washington Post he is “not active in any organized religion” but believes in God. That statement prompted a number of pundits — atheist and otherwise — to describe Sanders as the first “none” to run for president, referring to people who have no religious preference. […]

  88. treefrogdundee says

    I think the worst thing we can do at this point is underestimate Trump. Sure, the man is a babbling fascist with as many solid policy ideas as an empty burlap sack. But his support is not limited to the more dismal corners of the Red States. There is a disturbing number of people in purple or even blue states (such as the Rust Belt) who support him. It doesn’t matter WHY these people are willing to vote for the guy… not thinking he is serious about his more outlandish claims, a general bitterness with politics, starry-eyed love over his perceived charisma (Hitler had it too)… it doesn’t matter. MassMomentumEnergy’s idea of undecided voters going for Trump is frighteningly likely. Especially if Hillary gets the nomination. The combination of disgust for her and mindless infatuation with Trump could very well put him in the White House (does anyone know the process for applying for political refuge status in Canada?)

  89. says

    The most normal of the Republican presidential candidates (not saying much, I know) is Ohio Governor John Kasich. He’s preferable to Trump and Cruz, that’s for sure. But, beware:

    […] Kasich is part of a religious community that was built almost entirely on opposition to liberalized religious views on gays and lesbians. Kasich attends St. Augustine Anglican Church, in Westerville, Ohio, a church that was created in 2011 as part of a splinter group, the Anglican Church in North America, that broke with the Episcopal Church after it ordained Gene Robinson, a gay man, as a bishop. Kasich’s denomination doesn’t allow women to serve as bishops or ordain gays and lesbians as clergy, as it considers non-celibate homosexual relationships to be sinful.

    Kasich’s personal spiritual adviser is Father J. Kevin Maney, the rector at St. Augustine’s […] Maney has been outspoken in his views on LBGT people, […]

    The militant homosexualists, as with any militants, are hellbent to stifle any dissenting opinion, even opinion based on legitimate research. These thought nazis will resort to anything and if they are successful, we will pay dearly for it. If you care at all about real education and pursuit of knowledge, if you care about your basic freedoms, especially of thought and conscience, you had better pay attention to stories like this and be prepared to stand up to these bullies before it is too late. […]

    Link

    It would be wrong to condemn Kasich based on the rhetoric of his spiritual advisor, but I would like to hear Kasich say he disagrees with that crap.

  90. says

    Fox News, (and, embarrassingly, other media outlets) are getting the story about Hillary Clinton’s emails all wrong … again.

    On the February 10 edition of Fox News’ Outnumbered, co-host Andrea Tantaros falsely claimed the FBI “came out and said we are investigating” Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server, which she said “points to the fact that she is a full-blown liar.”

    In fact, on February 2 FBI General Counsel James Baker confirmed that the FBI probe into Clinton’s email use is “ongoing,” but did not say that that she is the target of the investigation […]
    Media Matters link.

  91. MassMomentumEnergy says

    The story about Hillary’s emails is that the FBI is investigating and they are tight lipped about it.

    Given the Clintons’ history, I would be shocked if a group of FBI agents couldn’t come up with a long list of indictable offenses just by digging through her email dump. It will be interesting to see what eventually shakes out of it all.

    http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000152-c304-d19a-addf-cb3d623f0001

    At that time, I informed you that the FBI could neither confirm nor deny the existence of any on-going investigation. Since that time, in public statements and testimony, the Bureau has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server. The FBI has not, however, publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope, or potential targets of any such proceedings. Thus, while the FBI’s response to you has changed to some degree due to these intervening events, we remain unable [to] provide the requested information [b]without adversely affecting on-going law enforcement efforts.[/b]

    If the FBI’s general counsel sent that letter about me, I’d be freaking out and planning on getting dragged through the court system meat grinder. Maybe Hillary’s privilege will save her, but that letter should scare her something fierce.

  92. MassMomentumEnergy says

    As an addendum, I would be shocked if a group of FBI agents couldn’t come up with a list of indictable offenses after digging through almost anyone’s email. Throw money and power into the mix, and it becomes an almost certainty.

  93. says

    MassMomentum @108, I agree.

    For Republicans who have a stake in the email controversy, one of the most effective tactics is just to prolong the the investigation. They want the dark cloud to hang around forever.

    I was a little surprised when some of the Republicans, and Fox News, did not take a step back when it was revealed that Colin Powell and Condi Rice sent and received classified documents. I shouldn’t have been surprised. Facts are not the point, a smear campaign is the point. Bernie Sanders was right to refuse to jump on that bandwagon.

  94. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    The City of Ferguson, after a years negotiation with the Feds about their police and court system, refused to implement the consent decree, and added some changes favorable to themselves.
    The Federal government is suing their asses. And they expect to defend the suit despite their deficit.

    The federal government sued the city of Ferguson on Wednesday, one day after the city council voted to revise an agreement aimed at improving the way police and courts treat poor people and minorities in the St. Louis suburb.
    The civil-rights lawsuit filed by the Justice Department alleged that Ferguson routinely violated residents’ rights and misused law enforcement to generate revenue — a practice the government said was “ongoing and pervasive.”
    Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Ferguson’s decision to reject the agreement left the department no choice except to sue.
    “The residents of Ferguson have waited nearly a year for the city to adopt an agreement that would protect their rights and keep them safe. … They have waited decades for justice. They should not be forced to wait any longer.”
    Ferguson spokesman Jeff Small declined to comment. Messages left with Mayor James Knowles III were not returned.
    Ferguson has been under Justice Department scrutiny since 18-year-old Michael Brown, who was black and unarmed, was fatally shot by white officer Darren Wilson 18 months ago. A grand jury and the Justice Department declined to prosecute Wilson, who resigned in November 2014.
    But a scathing Justice Department report was critical of police and a profit-driven municipal court system. Following months of negotiations, an agreement between the federal agency and Ferguson was announced in January.
    A recent financial analysis determined the agreement would cost the struggling city nearly $4 million in the first year alone. The council voted 6-0 Tuesday to adopt the deal, but with seven amendments.

    When the cost of defending yourself unsuccessfully against the inevitable, is likely more than the cost of compliance, I see either profound racism, profound madness, or a combination thereof.

  95. says

    It’s confirmed: Chris Christie is ending his presidential bid. He will say he is “suspending” his campaign, like they all do. That’s a legal status that allows him to continue to raise money, pay campaign bills, etc. How many “suspended” campaigns are resurrected?

    In “oh FFS!” news, the Supreme Court has made a decision that could put the Climate Accord (recently signed in Paris) in jeopardy.

    The Supreme Court’s surprise decision Tuesday to halt President Obama’s climate change regulation could weaken or even imperil the international global warming accord […]

    The Paris Agreement, the first accord to commit every country to combating climate change, had as a cornerstone Mr. Obama’s assurance that the United States would carry out strong, legally sound policies to significantly cut carbon emissions. Over history, the United States is the largest greenhouse gas polluter, although its annual emissions have been overtaken by China’s.

    But in the capitals of India and China, two of the world’s largest polluters, climate change policy experts said the Supreme Court decision threw the American commitment into question, and possibly New Delhi’s and Beijing’s, too.

    “If the U.S. Supreme Court actually declares the coal power plant rules stillborn, the chances of nurturing trust between countries would all but vanish,” said Navroz K. Dubash, a senior fellow at the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi. “This could be the proverbial string which causes Paris to unravel. […]”

    “Who can we negotiate with if the White House can’t be sure if it can keep its promises?” Mr. Zou asked. “Not the Congress. Not the court. The division of powers creates a very complicated situation.”

    New York Times link.

    Wired link.

    […] the country’s highest court said it will not enforce the Clean Power Plan—the EPA rule that forces massive cuts to coal power plants—until a lower court resolves legal challenges against the rule. Each state gets to decide how it wants to meet the EPA’s emissions goals (perhaps through stricter environmental standards, carbon taxes, or cap and trade) and has to submit its plan by June 2016.

    The court’s announcement doesn’t necessarily shut down the Clean Power Plan. But it could send a signal to recalcitrant states, manufacturers, and energy companies that they can keep dragging their feet on climate change. […]

    29 states have challenged the plan in court, arguing that the EPA has no business regulating carbon dioxide. […]

    It is unusual for the Supreme Court to put the brakes on EPA admissions rules before the case has been heard by lower courts. This interim halt is entirely unprecedented and unnecessary. Conservative justices allowed this stupid move.

    Inside Climate News link.

    […] It was an unusual intervention by the Supreme Court, given that a powerful appeals court had just weeks ago turned down a request by dozens of states and their allies in the fossil fuel industries to impose a stay on the new federal regulation. […]

    “I am extremely disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision,” said Attorney General Kamala Harris of California, one of 17 states that argued in favor of the rule in the appeals court. “The Court’s decision, and the special interests working to undermine this plan, threatens our environment, public health and economy.” […]

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has scheduled arguments for June and is expected to rule by late summer or early fall. An appeal to the Supreme Court would most likely be decided next year, after President Obama is out of office. […]

  96. says

    Nerd @108, I agree. Retrograde forces in Ferguson are fighting a losing battle, but they will be able to slow progress for some time. Disgusting. This will move will not be appreciated by most of the citizens of Ferguson.

    So, the city council votes unanimously to accept a consent decree … and then they go about rewriting it?

    Some sources are saying that the changes are meant to cover the asses of the city council when they disband the Ferguson police department in order to make most of the rest of the decree moot.

  97. MassMomentumEnergy says

    Looks like Bernie raised $7+ mil in the 24hrs since his NH victory speech (averaging something like $34 dollars per donation).

    He might actually be able to bankrupt Hillary in a spending arms race.

    Sure she has that sweet super PAC dough, but that can only be used for advertising and the like, not for salaries and canvassers which is the real lifeblood of a campaign. Her current donors are all pretty much tapped out, her small donor pool is pathetic (#ImNotKiddingMaddi), and getting new donors to back a troubled campaign is not only hard, $2,700 a plate dinners is going to play bad. I seriously doubt she has as many volunteer hours as Bernie which also cuts into her cash reserve. Unlike Bernie, she doesn’t pay her interns, so that helps. Even so, she could quickly find herself scrambling for cash to keep up in a campaign lasting far longer than she ever imagined.

    What a crazy election year.

  98. says

    Yes, Bernie has lots of small donors. Yes, he raised enormous sums of money after the win in NH. Good for him. That’s great!

    Hillary Clinton has 700,000+ small donors who have given under $100; and that does not count the small donors who have contributed more than once. Her small donor totals are not as big as Bernie’s, but are also not as nonexistent or negligible as MassMomentum implied in 111.

    Just looking for a reality check here.

    This morning the Congressional Black Caucus endorsed Hillary Clinton for President. Their caucus vote was unanimous.

  99. says

    As the campaigns head to South Carolina in about 9 days, we should be on the lookout for dirty tricks from the Republicans.

    […] in the lead-up to the primary, South Carolinians saw one of the ugliest dirty tricks in modern presidential history. Bush supporters launched rumors targeting McCain’s adopted daughter, with fake pollsters calling voters to ask, “Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?”

    […] he interactive site du jour launched last week is the Charleston Post and Courier’s ‘Whisper Campaign” — a digital tool that begs the public to help keep tabs on the coming blizzard of dirty tricks.[…]

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/south-carolina-dirty-tricks-republicans-219116

  100. says

    Female military veterans have more trouble getting proper health care than do their male counterparts. Mother Jones has the story.

    In other news, anti-abortion efforts are ramping up for a season of city-by-city and state-by-state efforts to either make abortion illegal or make access to abortion more difficult. Here is part of latest mailer from Personhood USA:

    It’s happening. We knew it would. After the tragic shooting at Planned Parenthood in late November, they had closed their doors through the holiday season. Now Planned Parenthood is re-opening their doors, all set to kill innocent babies once more.

    The shooting in November killed three people, among those pro-life hero Officer Garrett Swasey. Thinking of the shooting brings tears to my eyes. Thinking of the fact that Planned Parenthood will re-open its doors and kill innocent babies compounds that grief and adds a large dose of nausea. I can’t bear the thought that a place that has killed countless of innocent children will re-open to kill countless more.

    We unequivocally oppose all violence, including abortion-related violence, against born and unborn people alike. That is why we must legally close Planned Parenthood’s doors…by making abortion illegal city by city across the U.S. […]

    Link.

  101. says

    Rush Limbaugh came very close to endorsing Ted Cruz for president:

    If conservatism is your bag, if conservatism is the dominating factor in how you vote, there is no other choice for you in this campaign than Ted Cruz, because you are exactly right: This is the closest in our lifetimes we have ever been to Ronald Reagan.

  102. says

    Ben Carson floated the idea that he could be Trump’s pick for vice president. [laughing, but horrified at the same time]

    More from Ben Carson:

    I’m getting a lot of pressure to stay in the race. I respect that and I’m not just going to walk away from the millions of people supporting me.

    Hmmm, less than 25,000 people have voted for him so far if you add Iowa and New Hampshire votes. Carson is polling 5th in South Carolina.

    He is deluded.

  103. says

    Heidi Cruz is as addled as her husband, Ted Cruz:

    Heidi Cruz said Wednesday that her husband, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), was showing America “the face of the God that we serve” through his faith-based Republican presidential campaign. […]

    “We are at a cultural crossroads in our country, and if we can be in this race to show this country the face of the God that we serve—this Christian God that we serve is the foundation of our country,” she said. “Our country was built on Judeo-Christian values. We are a nation of freedom of religion, but the God of Christianity is the God of freedom, of individual liberty, of choice and of consequence.”

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/heidi-cruz-face-of-god

    Ted Cruz is the face of god?

  104. MassMomentumEnergy says

    Her small donor totals are not as big as Bernie’s, but are also not as nonexistent or negligible as MassMomentum implied in 111.

    Pathetic, not nonexistent nor negligible. ;-)

    This morning the Congressional Black Caucus endorsed Hillary Clinton for President. Their caucus vote was unanimous.

    Of course they did. No politician is going to cross the Clinton machine until the writing is already on the wall and a bit weather worn.

    Peace Action, an organization with about 200,000 members, endorsed Bernie Sanders for President today.

    Probably the best foreign policy endorsement possible.

    My primary concern with the next Commander in Chief is that they not bomb the fuck out of the world.

    Iraq, Honduras, Libya, Syria: that is Clinton’s “experience.” She loves war, and can be guaranteed to start at least a few small wars and might bumble into a big one.

    The republicans are worse.

    Bernie is far from a pacifist, but out of everyone with at least a snow ball’s chance in hell of making it through the political meat grinder to the Oval Office, he is the least likely to drop bombs on some poor schmo half the world away. That is important to me.

  105. MassMomentumEnergy says

    This morning the Congressional Black Caucus endorsed Hillary Clinton for President. Their caucus vote was unanimous.

    Oh man, it is even worse.

    The Congressional Black Caucus PAC endorsed Hillary without input from the Congressional Black Caucus. How Clintonian.

    https://twitter.com/keithellison/status/697809288203522048

    Rep. Keith Ellison Verified account
    ‏@keithellison

    Cong’l Black Caucus (CBC) has NOT endorsed in presidential. Separate CBCPAC endorsed withOUT input from CBC membership, including me.

  106. says

    There will be another Democratic debate tonight, in Wisconsin.

    PBS will stream it live if you don’t want to bother with watching on TV. The debate starts at 9 p.m. ET.

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/demdebate/

    PBS and WETA Washington, D.C., the flagship public television station in the nation’s capital, today announced that PBS NewsHour will produce the first Democratic presidential candidates debate following the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary on Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 9 PM ET.

    NewsHour co-anchors and managing editors Gwen Ifill and Judy Woodruff will moderate the PBS NewsHour Democratic Primary Debate, to be broadcast nationwide on PBS stations. The Democratic National Committee (DNC)-sanctioned debate will be held at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee on its main campus. […]

    “[…] Gwen Ifill and Judy Woodruff will bring to bear the trademark intelligence, balance, and gravitas of one of the nation’s most trusted and respected news operations as they elicit candidates’ views on issues facing the nation. We look forward to an illuminating, engaging debate that will enrich the national political dialogue and reflect PBS NewsHour’s fundamental mission to inform and educate the public.”

  107. says

    Apologies for duplicating the Democratic debate info up-thread. The first comment took so long to show up that I thought something had gone awry.

    Saad @120, some of the other supposedly godly Republican candidates do not see Cruz as the face of god. Mike Huckabee said:

    Ted Cruz apologized for his campaign spreading a false story that Ben Carson had dropped out of the race but he deflected blame to CNN. Dr. Carson, being a good Christian, accepted the apology on a personal level, but he didn’t buy Cruz’s claims of innocent intentions…I can attest to the fact that even in our campaign there were many efforts to try and say that people shouldn’t vote for me or Rick Santorum or Ben Carson. The Cruz people said it would be a wasted vote and they should vote for Cruz. It wouldn’t have made a difference for any of us, but it is the kind of low-life, sleazy politics people truly get sick of.

    Speaker of the House John Boehner has publicly referred to Cruz as a “jackass” and a “false prophet.”

  108. says

    Distinction: the Congressional Black Caucus PAC endorsed Clinton. There’s a CBC PAC board. Still looking into this so that future posts will present the details correctly.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/congressional-black-caucus-endorse-clinton-n516216

    The Congressional Black Caucus PAC endorsed Hillary Clinton […] Rep. Gregory Meeks announced the unanimous decision by the CBC board […]

    Meeks noted that no votes were cast for Sanders by the seventeen of nineteen board members present during deliberations. […]

  109. MassMomentumEnergy says

    More on the CBC PAC board:

    https://theintercept.com/2016/02/11/congressional-black-caucus-hillary/?comments=1#comments

    Ben Branch, the executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus PAC told The Intercept that his group made the decision after a vote from its 20-member board. The board includes 11 lobbyists, seven elected officials, and two officials who work for the PAC. Branch confirmed that the lobbyists were involved in the endorsement, but would not go into detail about the process.

    Members of the CBC PAC board include Daron Watts, a lobbyist for Purdue Pharma, the makers of highly addictive opioid OxyContin; Mike Mckay and Chaka Burgess, both lobbyists for Navient, the student loan giant that was spun off of Sallie Mae; former Rep. Al Wynn, D-Md., a lobbyist who represents a range of clients, including work last year on behalf of Lorillard Tobacco, the makers of Newport cigarettes; and William A. Kirk, who lobbies for a cigar industry trade group on a range of tobacco regulations.

    This is Jack’s complete lack of surprise.

  110. says

    Donald Trump had police remove a Clemson professor who was wearing a Muslim headdress at his rally.

    […] Yesterday, a Clemson professor and a Clemson graduate student—both black—went to Trump’s rally. The professor wore a traditional head covering […] He took his seat like everyone else at the event. He stood, like Clemson fans do for the entirety of football games, while listening to Trump speak. Not longer after, members of the Pickens County Sheriff’s Department began following him. He was asked to leave. Eventually, those cops, dressed in pseudo-military gear, explained the reason.

    The Trump Campaign Says You’re No Longer Welcome. […]

    Here’s a bit of backstory from a person familiar with Clemson, South Carolina:

    […] I started at Clemson more than a decade ago. I dipped deep into the belly of the Clemson’s racial beast a number of times. I watched there as the university’s most popular fraternity pledged allegiance to Robert E. Lee as the group’s ideological godfather. In 2006, I watched as the campus splintered after a group of white students dressed in blackface for a Martin Luther King, Jr. weekend party they called “Living the Dream.” Each day, I walked past a building named for “Pitchfork” Ben Tillman, a building famously renamed for him for his “contributions” to the university and the state. Tillman, of course, led gangs of Southern terrorists in lynchings of black men. He said openly on the floor of the legislature that “lynch law” was the only law. Swell guy.

    I’ve watched as Clemson football fans booed the very mention of the President of the United States during a ceremony to recognize the efforts of ROTC members. Over the last year or more, the university’s board of directors has shown itself woefully unprepared to lead in the 21st century by dismissing the legitimate concerns of black students over the environment on the campus. Those students weren’t asking for a whole lot. They just wanted an investment in minority achievement and for the university to stop honoring Tillman, a man who actively hunted their great grandfathers like those men were animals. […]

    Link.

  111. says

    An issue on which Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton agree:

    Both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have repeatedly emphasized the importance of protecting women’s reproductive rights, but mostly they’ve focused on domestic policy. Now, looking overseas, they say the United States should change the regulation of foreign aid for abortions.

    The 1973 Helms amendment blocks the use of foreign aid for women who were raped in conflict zones or developing countries and seeking an abortion. The amendment states, “No foreign assistance funds may be used to pay for the performance of abortions as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions.” The Hyde amendment, which was passed three years after the Helms amendment, prohibits federal funding from being used for elective abortions—abortions that are not because of incest, rape, or life endangerment.

    […] Clinton promised to change the Helms amendment and create an exception for rape, incest, and protecting the life of the mother. Sanders said he would use executive action to repeal the Helms amendment altogether. […]

    “As president, he will sign an executive order to allow for U.S. foreign aid to pay for abortions in cases of rape, incest or when the life of the woman is at risk. He will also work with Congress to permanently repeal both the Hyde and Helms amendments.” [said Arianna Jones, deputy communications director for Sanders]

    Link.

  112. says

    This is an “oh FFS” moment. Rightwing radio hosts have started to insult Bernie Sanders’ wife. They have been making insulting and stupid comments about Hillary Clinton’s appearance for some time. We sort of expected that. Now they’re going after Jane Sanders.

    On his radio program yesterday, after predicting that Sen. Bernie Sanders will turn into a violent dictator if elected president, right-wing radio host Michael Savage blasted the Vermont independent’s wife, Jane O’Meara Sanders, for “looking like Stalin’s housekeeper,” unlike Donald Trump’s “beautiful” wife Melania. […]

    While criticizing Sanders as a “jealous loser,” Savage hailed Trump’s family: “When I saw the beautiful Trump family on the stage last night, I said, ‘America is back again.’ I said, ‘Camelot is back again.’ I said, ‘My God, wouldn’t it be beautiful to have a first lady like Mrs. Trump? Wouldn’t it be beautiful to have a first family like the Trump family?’”

    “Can you imagine what this county would look like if Bernie Sanders became president?” he said. “His wife looks like Stalin’s housekeeper. And if you want an America with a first lady that walks around looking like Stalin’s housekeeper, well my friends, vote for Bernie Sanders.”

    Link.

  113. says

    Bernie Sanders has been speaking out about reform of drug policies for some time. Now he has gone a step further.

    U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont filed a bill in the Senate on Wednesday that would abolish all federal penalties for possessing and growing marijuana. The “Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2015” bill would remove references to cannabis in the Controlled Substances Act. Transporting marijuana from jurisdictions where it is illegal to places where it is not would still be prohibited.

    Raw Story link.

    Sounds like a good bill to me. For one thing, weed is still illegal at the federal level, no matter what progressive steps some states have taken. As a result, businesses serving cannabis customers do not have access to our banking system. Forcing those businesses into a cash-only operation can be dangerous, and may even impede the collection of taxes.

  114. says

    Oh, this is one nasty condemnation of Republican Congress critters.

    […] “In the course of the talks for exchanging prisoners, the Republican rivals of the current US administration who claim to be humanitarians and advocates of human rights sent a message telling us not to release these people [American prisoners] and continue this process [of talks] until the eve of US presidential elections,” Shamkhani said. […]

    Ali Shamkhani is the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. “We acted upon our independent resolve and moved the process forward,” Shamkhani said.

    The prisoner swap to which Shamkhani referred was the part of the recent deal in which Washington Post journalist Jason Rezaian and three other U.S. citizens were freed. In exchange, the USA released seven Iranians. Donald Trump and other Republicans called the Iranians that were released “the worst of the worst,” “terrorists,” etc. However those seven individuals were all more like business people committing white collar crimes, not violent acts. They broke the laws pertaining to sanctions against Iran. They shipped or sold goods to Iran.

    The families of the U.S. citizens who were released will be really angry, I should think, to learn that their loved ones may have been imprisoned for many more months if Republican Congress critters had gotten their way.

  115. says

    This is an all-too-typical move by Republican congressmen.

    Pregnant women in South and Latin America who contract Zika, a rapidly spreading mosquito-borne virus linked to severe birth defects and deformities in babies, should not have access to abortion, Republican House leaders said Wednesday.

    “This push for more abortion access is heartbreaking, especially since there are different degrees of microcephaly,” Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, said at a hearing about the virus. […]

    House Republicans running the Zika virus hearing avoided the issue of contraception and family planning access for women in endemic countries and instead urged women to welcome babies born with microcephaly. Duncan acknowledged that “many women do not have the luxury of simply choosing to wait” to get pregnant, but added that abortion access is not the answer, because many babies born with microcephaly “go on to lead very normal lives.”

    “Each child is made in the image of God and has inherent worth,” he said.[…]

    Link.

    House Republicans are completely against letting each pregnant woman make the choice herself.

  116. MassMomentumEnergy says

    Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DNC chair) on the importance of super delegates:

    http://progressivewonk.com/debbie-wasserman-schultz-just-gave-the-weirdest-answer-about-superdelegates-on-cnn-are-they-clintons-firewall-93/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=reddit&utm_source=news

    Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activist.

    If Bernie wins the popular vote, comes to the convention with the most pledged delegates, and the DNC hands the nomination to Hillary, shit is going to get real. The ’68 convention will look like tea time at the convalescent home in comparison.

  117. says

    George W. Bush is hitting the campaign trail in South Carolina to support Jeb.

    Trump doesn’t have a good ground game in SC, but everyone expects him to win anyway.

    Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone has decided to put his mega bucks behind John Kasich.

    Marco Rubio’s tax plan, or no-tax plan, reduces capital gains taxes to almost nothing. Paul Krugman called it “Rubio for the Rich.”

    […] Marco Rubio’s proposal to eliminate taxes on capital gains goes well beyond anything we’ve seen from previous Republican contenders, even highly conservative candidates. It seems worth adding some numbers on just how much this would be a giveaway to the very, very rich. […]

    Half of taxes on dividends and long-term capital gains are paid, not by the 1 percent, but by the 0.1 percent — the richest 1/1000th of Americans. Another 29 percent are paid by the next 0.9 percent. Everyone else — the other 99 percent of the population — pays just 21 percent of the total.

    So this is a tax cut not just for the rich, but for the very, very rich, with essentially nothing for the vast majority of Americans. And there is […] absolutely no reason to believe that there would be large economic benefits from this giveaway.

  118. says

    A moment from last night’s debate that drew a lot of applause:

    “Here is a pledge I’ve made throughout this campaign, and it’s really not a very radical pledge,” Sanders said. “When we have more people in jail, disproportionately African American and Latino, than China does, a communist authoritarian society four times our size. Here’s my promise, at the end of my first term as president we will not have more people in jail than any other country.”

    I agree with the intention and the sentiment, but there will be a problem when it comes to execution. I’m sure Sanders meant “prisons” that incarcerate people convicted of serious crimes, and not “jails” which hold people awaiting trial and people who may have committed less serious crimes. That aside, there’s a state-by-state population of prisoners who are not in federal prisons.

    […] of the 2.3 million people behind bars in this country, fewer than 10% are Federal prisoners. The rest are in state prisons and local jails. If the President were to release all of the Federal prisoners, we would still, as a country, have more prisoners than any other country. So Sen. Sanders was very specifically making a promise he has no way of keeping. […]

    Same Facts link.

    Maybe Sanders has another plan, and/or more details that we can examine.

  119. says

    Analysis of last night’s Democratic debate from Kevin Drum of Mother Jones:

    This is the bind Hillary Clinton is in. Bernie Sanders delivers all these big, stemwinding proposals and doesn’t really have to explain how he’s going to pass any of them or get them paid for. But he sure is visionary!

    Hillary, conversely, is just constitutionally incapable of talking like this. When a problem is raised, her mind instantly starts thinking about what works and who will vote for it and where the payfors are going to come from. And that means she sounds like an old fuddy duddy patiently explaining why your bright idea won’t work. No wonder young voters don’t care much for her.

    http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/02/hillary

  120. says

    Hillary Clinton’s closing statement from the debate last night:

    You know, we agree that we’ve got to get unaccountable money out of politics. We agree that Wall Street should never be allowed to wreck Main Street again. But here’s the point I want to make tonight. I am not a single-issue candidate, and I do not believe we live in a single-issue country. I think that a lot of what we have to overcome to break down the barriers that are holding people back, whether it’s poison in the water of the children of Flint, or whether it’s the poor miners who are being left out and left behind in coal country, or whether it is any other American today who feels somehow put down and oppressed by racism, by sexism, by discrimination against the LGBT community, against the kind of efforts that need to be made to root out all of these barriers, that’s what I want to take on.

    And here in Wisconsin, I want to reiterate: We’ve got to stand up for unions and working people who have done it before, the American middle class, and who are being attacked by ideologues, by demagogues. Yes, does Wall Street and big financial interests, along with drug companies, insurance companies, big oil, all of it, have too much influence? You’re right.

    But if we were to stop that tomorrow, we would still have the indifference, the negligence that we saw in Flint. We would still have racism holding people back. We would still have sexism preventing women from getting equal pay. We would still have LGBT people who get married on Saturday and get fired on Monday. And we would still have governors like Scott Walker and others trying to rip out the heart of the middle class by making it impossible to organize and stand up for better wages and working conditions. So I’m going to keep talking about tearing down all the barriers that stand in the way of Americans fulfilling their potential, because I don’t think our country can live up to its potential unless we give a chance to every single American to live up to theirs.

  121. says

    From Bernie Sanders’ closing statement:

    This campaign is not just about electing a president, what this campaign is about is creating a process for a political revolution.

    I haven’t found a source that I don’t have to pay for for the entire closing statement from Sanders. I’ll keep looking.

    Other sources:
    http://www.npr.org/2016/02/11/466448610/watch-the-pbs-democratic-primary-debate

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/watch-live-pbs-newshour-democratic-primary-debate/

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/pbs-democratic-debate-presidential-election-2016/

    http://www.politicususa.com/2016/02/11/winners-losers-pbscnn-democratic-debate.html

    The Washington Post posted a transcript of the debate. That’s the source I tried to use, but they want me to pay for a subscription. If someone else has not yet used up their monthly allotment of free-access articles, please do us a favor and get the closing statement from Sanders to post here. Thanks.

  122. says

    President Obama plans to add considerable acreage to land he has already protected at National Monuments.

    President Obama designated three new national monuments in the California desert Thursday, expanding federal protection to 1.8 million acres of landscapes that have retained their natural beauty despite decades of heavy mining, cattle ranching and off-roading.

    The largest of the areas, Mojave Trails National Monument, is of historic significance, the White House said, with ancient Native American trading routes, World War II-era training camps and the longest undeveloped stretch of Route 66.

    The two smaller areas — the Sand to Snow National Monument and the Castle Mountains National Monument — include Native American archaeological and cultural sites, as well as diverse wildlife, ranging from golden eagles and bighorn sheep to mountain lions and bobcats. Together, they encompass nearly 180,000 acres.

    http://www.latimes.com/science/la-me-monuments-20160212-story.html

    So far, we have a total of 265 million acres of protected land during the Obama administration, the bulk of it in the expansion of a marine monument in the Pacific Ocean.

    Senator Dianne Feinstein asked for the land designations. She tried to get it through Congress, but Republicans stopped her. The designations from Obama do not include funding, that has to come from Congress. Republicans are not likely to grant funding.

  123. tomh says

    Sanders’ closing statement:

    “All right, look, this has been a great debate. A lot of interesting issues have come together. Let me conclude by just saying this.

    There is no president, in my view, not Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders, who has the capability or the power to take on Wall Street, large campaign donors, the corporate media, the big money interests in this country alone.

    This campaign is not just about electing a president. What this campaign is about is creating a process for a political revolution in which millions of Americans, working people who have given up on the political process, they don’t think anybody hears their pains or their concerns.

    Young people for whom getting involved in politics is as, you know, it’s like going to the moon. It ain’t going to happen. Low income people who are not involved in the political process.

    SANDERS: What this campaign is not only about electing someone who has the most progressive agenda, it is about bringing tens of millions of people together to demand that we have a government that represents all of us and not just the 1 percent, who today have so much economic and political power.

    Thank you all very much.”

  124. says

    The Ted Cruz campaign created an attack ad against Marco Rubio. The Cruz ad employs a softcore porn actress. Whoops. Cruz did not intend to do that, so he pulled the ad.
    Link.

    Prior to the Cruz campaign pulling the ad, [actress Amy] Lindsay told BuzzFeed News in a phone interview on Thursday that she’s a Christian conservative and a Republican. While she emphasized that she did not do hardcore porn and that she also appeared in non-erotic films, Lindsay said she thinks it is “cool” that an actor who has appeared in softcore porn could also appear in Cruz’s ad.

    “In a cool way, then hey, then it’s not just some old, white Christian bigot that people want to say, ‘It could be, maybe, a cool kind of open-minded woman like me,’” she said of people supporting Cruz.

    Buzz Feed link.

  125. says

    Thanks tom @143.

    The Republican candidates (with the exception of Trump) are speaking at a “Faith and Family” forum in South Carolina. A lot of weapon’s grade pandering and stupidity is coming out of that forum.

    From Jeb Bush:

    If Hillary Clinton gets the four Supreme Court justices, the Second Amendment won’t exist. It just won’t.

    Sound like Jeb has adopted the Trumpian rhetorical flourish of repeating himself in order to emphasize that the falsehood he has just uttered is really true, really true. It just is.

    More on this forum later. I need to get the exact quote from Cruz: he said that the rules in the Bible should be the basis of government.

  126. says

    Ted Cruz said some more stupid stuff:

    We are one justice away from the Supreme Court striking down the Second Amendment, ruling that no individual American has any right whatsoever to keep and bear arms, we are one justice away from that. We are one justice away from the Supreme Court striking down Ten Commandments monuments all over the United States, […]

    Link

    Franklin Graham said some stupid stuff:

    Secularism and communism, there’s no difference,” he said. “They’re both exactly the same, they’re both godless […]”

    “Ladies and gentlemen, we’ve got maybe one election left,” he declared. “And I’ve been told by people who know that the game will be over. And I’m telling you right now, we’re very close to losing.” […]

    Link.

  127. says

    Here’s some good news, President Obama’s administration plans to provide expanded Medicaid services to pregnant women and children in Flint, MI. It even looks like Governor Snyder may help by actually cooperating with a good idea.

    […] Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell, Assistant Secretary Dr. Nicole Lurie and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy told lawmakers they anticipate being able to offer health care coverage to some individuals who may have consumed contaminated water in Flint.

    The Medicaid coverage would include lead-blood level monitoring, behavioral health and nutritional support. The secretaries also told lawmakers that HHS is working with Michigan on an expedited basis.

    Republican Gov. Rick Snyder needs to formally request the coverage, but he’s already signaled he intends to do so.

    Politico link

  128. MassMomentumEnergy says

    Re: Bernie’s comment about trying to get our prison population lower than China’s (which has a billion more people than us).

    It depends on how hard core he wants to go: he could declare the end to the war on drugs.

    Approximately 98,000 federal prisoners are in prison for non-violent drug crimes. Another 21,000 are there for non-violent immigration offenses. He could pardon all of them his first day in office (logistically probably not recommended).

    There are around 140,000 non-violent drug offenders in California and New York prisons. California has already been sued to release prisoners as overcrowding has been judged cruel and unusual punishment. The logic behind Brown v. Plata could be used against other states as well. Both CA and NY are under democratic control and could be very willing to play ball under the protection presidential cover.

    There are 804,800 state prisoners across the nation that are serving sentences for non-violent drug crimes.

    Furthermore, there are around 650,000 people released from prison normally each year. If we assume that the 50% of federal inmates and 16% of state inmates that were convicted for non-violent drug offenses are no longer put in prison for such crimes, and that otherwise the prison population would remain steady, that is around 42,000 federal and 90,000 state prisoners per year that will no longer be going into the system to balance out those leaving, or a 132,000 deficit per year, or 528,000 people over his first term.

    Reducing the US prison population by half a million people over four years is more than possible. The only question is, do we have the will to do it.

  129. says

    Democratic debate analysis from Glenn thrush of Politico.

    […] Ask Bernie Sanders about anything – ISIS, the Trump Phenomenon, four hundred years of slavery and the oppression of blacks — and he’ll make it all about those evil Clinton-enabled Wall Street SOBs. Marco Rubio has got nothing on Sanders, who possesses the singular gift of making something he’s repeated ten thousand times sound like it sprung from his deepest feelings at the moment.

    That’s not to say core Democratic voters, especially young ones, aren’t moved by his call to end economic inequality. But at times, it seems that Sanders – in an effort to buttress his belief that America’s woes stem from the monied elite — shoehorns everything into his unified field theory of American politics, even a socio-politico-economic phenomenon as the troubling, persistent phenomenon of generational black poverty. […]

    She [Clinton] did a reverse-Bernie in her opening statement, speeding through her denunciation of Wall Street to tackle the racial roots of economic deprivation. “We both agree that we have to get unaccountable money out of our political system and that we have to do much more to ensure that Wall Street never wrecks Main Street again,” she said – quickly adding: “But I want to go further. I want to tackle those barriers that stand in the way of too many Americans right now. African-Americans who face discrimination in the job market, education, housing, and the criminal justice system.”

    It wasn’t that Sanders – who met with the Rev. Al Sharpton in Harlem this week – didn’t hit all those same points during the debate; It’s that he views racism through the prism of economic inequality – and Clinton views discrimination as an entirely distinct, and ongoing, problem. And most of the African-American community in South Carolina – one of the most racially polarized states in the union — agree with her attitude. […]

  130. MassMomentumEnergy says

    The gloves have come off:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dnc-allowing-donations-from-federal-lobbyists-and-pacs/2016/02/12/22b1c38c-d196-11e5-88cd-753e80cd29ad_story.html

    The Democratic National Committee has rolled back restrictions introduced by presidential candidate Barack Obama in 2008 that banned donations from federal lobbyists and political action committees.

    The decision was viewed with disappointment Friday morning by good government activists who saw it as a step backward in the effort to limit special interest influence in Washington. Some suggested it could provide an advantage to Hillary Clinton’s fundraising efforts.

    “It is a major step in the wrong direction,” said longtime reform advocate Fred Wertheimer. “And it is completely out of touch with the clear public rejection of the role of political money in Washington,” expressed during the 2016 campaign.

  131. says

    We are seeing signs that Paul Ryan is getting tired of being Speaker of the House. Frustrated. Weary. About 40 of the Republicans he speaks for are Tea Party diehards who want to kill government:

    […] “If you want to do phony work and you want to go out to the floor and talk about a bunch of phony stuff that sounds nice then put it up on YouTube and go back to your district and say, ‘We’re really the only ones fighting,’” members can do that, he said. But “If you actually want to do real work,” then Republicans should buckle down and figure out a budget. […]

    Politico link.

    Dream on Speaker Ryan. Some of the doofuses under your wing do not want to do anything but obstruct the functions of government.

  132. MassMomentumEnergy says

    If Ryan says, “fuck this shit, I’m outta here” who is going to replace him?

    No one else wanted the position the first time and it seemed Ryan was strong armed into it.

  133. says

    MassMomentum @153, good point. I don’t think there are any Republican Congress critters dumb enough to take the job of Speaker if Ryan throws up his hands and walks out.

    During the last Republican game of thrones, some conservatives tried to recruit somebody from outside the Congress (Newt Gingrich, anyone?). Maybe Ryan can hang in there until after the presidential election, after which the Congress critters can recruit Trump to whip the Republicans into line. (Assuming we don’t get President Trump.)

    Speaking of Trump, he is now threatening to sue Ted Cruz over the question of Cruz’s Canadian citizenship.

    If @TedCruz doesn’t clean up his act, stop cheating, & doing negative ads, I have standing to sue him for not being a natural born citizen.

  134. says

    Donald Trump has spiced up his conspiracy theories about immigrants by sprinkling Pope Francis into the mix.

    […] “The pope is a very political person,” Trump said. “I think he doesn’t understand the problems our country has. I don’t think he understands the danger of the open border that we have with Mexico.”

    Trump then implied that the Mexican government forced the Holy Father to take a stand on immigration.

    “I think Mexico got him to do it because Mexico wants to keep the border just the way it is because they’re making a fortune and we’re losing,” Trump said. […]

    Francis, who is from Argentina, has been an outspoken advocate for immigrants rights throughout his papacy. He has condemned anti-immigrant hatred, surprised 2,000 immigrants living in a shelter with Christmas presents in 2013, and his first visit outside of the Vatican as pope was to Lampedusa, a Mediterranean island that harbors North African migrants traveling to Europe.

    He also sent a personal letter to a group of Arizona teens volunteering to help immigrants in the United States and thanked them for their work.

    And while Trump famously opposes allowing Syrian refugees — and Muslims in general — to enter the United States, last year Pope Francis called on every Catholic parish in Europe to take in a Syrian family seeking asylum, and even said that churches who refuse should be required to pay property taxes because he does not see them as genuinely religious.

    […] When Francis visited the United States last summer, Trump told CNN that if the pontiff ever spoke with him about the dangers of capitalism, he would reply — inexplicably — by saying “ISIS wants to get you. ISIS wants to invade the Vatican.”

    Think Progress link.

  135. says

    Secretary of State John Kerry has been trying to negotiate a cease fire in Syria for some time. Now he has succeeded. The big question: will it hold?

    Syria’s warring sides agreed to a ceasefire in Munich on Thursday that is set to take affect next week. […] a break in fighting could prove valuable for civilians in desperate need of humanitarian aid.

    The U.N. hopes to use the ceasefire period to deliver crucial aid to civilians in besieged areas. […]

    The death toll from the war was recently estimated to be around 470,000, a stark increase from previous estimations. Starvation is also rampant in certain parts of the country, where a ceasefire could open up space for aid deliveries. […]

    The “cessation of hostilities”, as it is being referred to by Secretary of State John Kerry, is not expected to hold however, with some diplomats telling the BBC the agreement is “not worth the paper it’s printed on.”

    Many Syrians don’t believe the regime will uphold their part of the deal. “The regime has never sounded genuine about a ceasefire,” Mohammed al-Sheikh, a Free Syrian Army Spokesman in Azaz, told the Guardian. “No one believes it. Talking about a ceasefire has become a routine. But it’s a useless process.” […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/world/2016/02/12/3749208/syria-ceasefire/

  136. tomh says

    @ #149

    Even granting your totally unrealistic projections, reducing the prison population by a half million in four years, doesn’t look like it brings our number down below China, even in raw numbers. At least according to the numbers from the BBC. And, of course, if you look at prison population per 100,000 people, it’s laughable.

    I thought the quote in #138 hit the nail on the head, “Bernie Sanders delivers all these big, stemwinding proposals and doesn’t really have to explain how he’s going to pass any of them or get them paid for. But he sure is visionary!” In the case of prisoners, he doesn’t even have to explain how he thinks such a thing is possible.

  137. says

    Some more details regarding the nasty push-polling being conducted in South Carolina:

    […] When she selected Sen. Marco Rubio as one of her choices, she said, things got nasty.

    “That’s when he said, ‘Did you know that Marco Rubio and the Gang of Eight are for amnesty?’” she recalled in a phone interview. “And then the gentleman said he’s for letting 11 million illegal immigrants stay in the U.S. and that he was for letting Syrians cross the borders freely.”

    Barrett said […] she couldn’t figure out right away who it was from. The voice said the poll was conducted by some place called Remington Research. […]

    Ted Cruz denies having anything to do with that push poll, but he has a connection to Remington Research. It’s a consulting firm the Jeff Roe, Cruz’s campaign manager, founded.

    The story comes from the Washington Post.

  138. says

    Eyebrow-raising criticism from the rightwing:

    Conservative media are attacking Cosmopolitan magazine for working in partnership with Everytown for Gun Safety to run a feature highlighting the issues surrounding gun ownership and domestic violence.

    Conservative media attacked the feature, comparing it to anti-Jewish Nazi propaganda and labeling it a “war on men with guns” while saying Cosmo wants its readers to be “slutty and defenseless.” Several conservative media critics expressed skepticism that Cosmo was capable of publishing serious reporting. […]

    Media Matters link.

  139. says

    Rush Limbaugh defended the Koch brothers and George W. Bush:

    That’s exactly how this country was portrayed last night, and the previous debate, and every other Democrat debate or every Democrat campaign appearance. This place is portrayed as Hell on earth, brought to you by George W. Bush, the Republicans and the Iraq War, in the modern incarnation. The America they want to save us from, the America from which they want to liberate us, is not George W. Bush’s. It’s Barack Obama’s. But they don’t ever say that. They blame the Koch brothers. Nobody knows who the Koch Brothers are. The Koch Brothers can’t do, don’t do diddly — the Koch brothers never enforced a regulation on anyone, the Koch brothers never raised anybody’s taxes. The Koch brothers never sent anybody’s kids off to war. The Koch brothers haven’t done diddly squat because they can’t, they’re not in government. Government does all of this.

    Media Matters link.

    With their support of the American Legislative Council alone, the Koch brothers have affected government policy, and continue to do so. They’ve also had a big effect on down-ticket races where they backed Republicans for state office.

  140. says

    Yikes.

    A one-time candidate for the New York Senate was arrested Thursday night in Niagara Falls after police found an assault rifle, knife, and black ski mask in her car.

    Uh, Gia Arnold, for what, exactly, did you need the AR-15, the combat knife and black ski mask?

    […] Arnold, a mother of three, was charged with criminal possession of an assault weapon. Halim Johnson, 18, was also arrested on gun charges. His connection to Arnold wasn’t immediately clear.

    Supporters had already launched a legal defense fund for Arnold, which had raised $1,900 by Friday afternoon.

    “On Feb 10th Gia Arnold and her boyfriend became victims of the NYS (UN)Safe Act and racial profiling,” the fundraising page read. “We are asking all patriots to Rally behind her and help her get out of this horrid mess.”

    Arnold, then 24, ran as a Republican with strong Tea Party backing in the 2014 62nd District New York Senate race. […]

    No surprise there. We assume the mom with the AR-15 and the ski mask is a Tea Partier.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/gia-arnold-arrested-niagara-falls

  141. says

    There are now only six candidates left in the Republican race for the nomination to be the GOP candidate for president. (I never thought I would be writing “only six” with a sense of relief. That’s still a lot of candidates.)

    Trump, Kasich, Cruz, Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Carson are scheduled to debate.

    All six GOP candidates will appear on the debate stage tomorrow night. The February 13 debate will be held in South Carolina. CBS is the network host.

  142. says

    Say what!? Ben Carson thinks that Democrats are deliberately destroying black families in order to cultivate their votes. You do realize that makes no sense even as political spin, right Mr. Carson?

    Earlier today on “Breitbart News Daily,” Stephen K. Bannon asked Ben Carson what he thought of the “unseemly” and “shameful” attempts by Democratic presidential candidates to make direct appeals to black voters by doing things like meeting with Al Sharpton, something which Carson would never do.

    Carson said that black voters’ “obeisance to the Democratic Party” has “yielded more poverty and broken homes and crime and incarceration and it’s completely unnecessary.”

    He then alleged that Democrats want to keep black people impoverished in order to win their votes.

    “Throwing away faith and family are deleterious to any community and it’s extra devastating on the black community,” he said. “And I believe that many people of the people who are trying to cultivate their votes know that and are intentionally destroying those pillars of strength to keep people in a dependent position.” […]

    Link.

  143. says

    Good economic news:

    The U.S. government posted a $55 billion budget surplus in January, up from an $18 billion deficit in the same month a year ago, the Treasury Department said on Wednesday. Analysts polled by Reuters had expected a $45 billion surplus for last month. Treasury officials said the surplus was boosted by the highest receipts on record for the month of January.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-budget-idUSKCN0VJ2AN

  144. says

    Holy crap! The Senate actually confirmed some of the ambassadors chosen by President Obama. Unprecedented (sarcasm). And about damned time (I’m talking to you Ted Cruz.).

    The Senate on Friday confirmed a handful of ambassadors and State Department officials, including the American ambassadors to Sweden and Norway — a move that came after Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, lifted his months-long hold on the nominations which were in place because of his objection to the Iran nuclear deal.

    In the Senate any one senator can put a “hold” on a nomination, and Cruz had been blocking the speedy consideration of a number of nominations for the past seven months.

    An aide to Cruz said that he decided to lift his hold Friday because “he feels that after seven months that the American people are very aware of the negative consequences of this deal.” […]

    MSNBC link.

    Before we get too excited, there is still a backlog of nominees. Who knows when the Senate will clear the backlog.

  145. says

    Oh, FFS. Fox News is now insulting Bernie Sanders’ looks and his voice:

    As freaky as Bernie Sanders is on so many levels — I mean, he’s a hard-core socialist, raising taxes to 90 percent. He’s a freak to look at. His voice is annoying. With all due respect to everybody from Brooklyn out there, his voice is annoying.

    The quote is from Fox News’ “Your World” show (today), with Charles Gasparino as the guest.

  146. says

    Fox News is so sure that Trump is going to become the GOP candidate for president that they are seriously discussing who should be his V.P. pick. Who is Fox pushing? Scott Brown.

    Brown now works for Fox as a contributor. He is a former Senator (served half a term, Elizabeth Warren replaced him). Fox likes Scott Brown because he is handsome has a good-looking wife.

    He’s central casting! A great guy and a beautiful wife and a great family.

    That’s just one of a half-dozen mentions on Fox that touted Brown as V.P. material.

    Scott Brown is the guy that warned his constituents that ISIS might cross the southern border with the USA, and that they would bring Ebola with them. Brown was connected to a penny stock scam that was run out of a fake address in Florida.

  147. jimb says

    Lynna @ 130:

    This is an “oh FFS” moment.

    Lynna @ 167:

    Oh, FFS. Fox News is now insulting Bernie Sanders’ looks and his voice:

    Thanks for braving the environment to post these snippets. I’ve had too many “FFS moments” that I can’t even read/watch the news anymore. But reading this thread gives me the gist of what’s going on and doesn’t make me want to throw my laptop. :-)

  148. Ichthyic says

    I’ve had too many “FFS moments” that I can’t even read/watch the news anymore.

    I’m so tired of the BernieVSHillary show hogging my post feed that I have unfollowed nearly all my American friends on FB until after the primaries are done, and even tried installing filters to block newsfeeds with either name in them.

    …that managed to narrow it down to where it’s only 10% of my feed instead of 75% at least.

    but of course, threads about Donald Trump now tend to dominate.

    *sigh*

  149. Ichthyic says

    Scott Brown is the guy that warned his constituents that ISIS might cross the southern border with the USA, and that they would bring Ebola with them. Brown was connected to a penny stock scam that was run out of a fake address in Florida.

    well, then is it any wonder they think he would be a good match for Trump?

  150. says

    This is a followup to comment 86.

    Rachel Maddow covered the issue of voter turnout. She pointed out that the predicted-but-not-yet-materialized huge voter turnout may change in Nevada.

    In other news, we’ve been talking about the evil company Ted Cruz keeps for some time. Rachel Maddow covered the issue well.

  151. says

    Weirdly, this sort of makes sense:

    Two men with mirrors and a wooden cross interrupted a campaign event in Raymond, New Hampshire to perform an exorcism on Ted Cruz on Monday, saying that the Republican presidential candidate was “possessed by a demon.” […]

    Raw Story link.

  152. says

    Well, Trump didn’t have to file a lawsuit against Ted Cruz. Trump’s supporters did that for him.

    Trump supporters file ‘birther’ lawsuit against Cruz in federal court

    The lawsuit, filed Feb. 3 at a district court in Alabama, seeks a judgment “declaring that Rafael Edward Cruz is ineligible to qualify/run/seek and be elected to the Office of the President of the United States of America” due to his Canadian birth. […]

    The Hill link.

  153. says

    Madeline Albright apologized. And rightly so, in my opinion.

    “I have spent much of my career as a diplomat. It is an occupation in which words and context matter a great deal. So one might assume I know better than to tell a large number of women to go to hell,” Albright opened the column. […]

    Albright wrote that while she “absolutely” believes women should help one another, she used the oft-repeated line in “the wrong context and the wrong time.”

    “In a society where women often feel pressured to tear one another down, our saving grace lies in our willingness to lift one another up,” Albright wrote. “And while young women may not want to hear anything more from this aging feminist, I feel it is important to speak to women coming of age at a time when a viable female presidential candidate, once inconceivable, is a reality.”

    Talking Points Memo link.

    NY Times link to Albright’s complete essay.

    […] last Saturday, in the excitement of a campaign event for Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, that is essentially what I did, when I delivered a line I have uttered a thousand times to applause, nodding heads and laughter: “There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other.” It is a phrase I first used almost 25 years ago, when I was the United States ambassador to the United Nations and worked closely with the six other female U.N. ambassadors. But this time, to my surprise, it went viral.

    […] I did not mean to argue that women should support a particular candidate based solely on gender. But I understand that I came across as condemning those who disagree with my political preferences. If heaven were open only to those who agreed on politics, I imagine it would be largely unoccupied. […]

    Voters must make an informed decision about whom they elect based on the issues that matter most to them, which of course are not limited to those of gender: education, a growing economy, national security. These affect us all, regardless of our sex. […]

  154. says

    This is a followup of sorts to comment 163.

    Governor Matt Bevin and his Republican cohorts have made an effort to further restrict access to abortion services for the women of Kentucky.

    Conservative legislators in Kentucky, emboldened by the election of Gov. Matt Bevin (R), are moving swiftly to pass numerous new restrictions on a women’s access to abortion. Bevin has already signed into law a stricter “informed consent” bill that requires a face-to-face consultation with a healthcare provider, while a forced ultrasound bill sailed easily through a Senate committee this week.

    The bill does allow women to avert their eyes during the ultrasound. Sheesh.

    One lawmaker, however, is trying to turn all of these restrictions on women back on men. Rep. Mary Lou Marzian (D) has filed a new bill (HB 396) creating numerous restrictions for men to access medication for erectile dysfunction, such as Viagra or Cialis. HB 396 adds the following four steps a man would have to undergo:

    He must have two office visits on two different calendar days before the health care practitioner prescribes a drug for erectile dysfunction to him.

    He can only be prescribed the drug if he is married.

    He must produce a signed and dated letter from his current spouse providing consent for the prescription.

    He must make a sworn statement on a Bible that he will only use the prescription when having sexual relations with his current spouse.

    Think Progress link.

  155. says

    The dismal history of poisoning children with lead in the USA … mostly children in households below the poverty line:

    […] There’s a lead crisis for children in Baltimore, Maryland, Herculaneum, Missouri, Sebring, Ohio, and even the nation’s capital, Washington, DC, and that’s just to begin a list. State reports suggest, for instance, that “18 cities in Pennsylvania and 11 in New Jersey may have an even higher share of children with dangerously elevated levels of lead than does Flint.” […]

    Mother Jones link.

  156. says

    Nasty Rumors are floating around. Here’s a debunking of one of them:

    There is a post widely shared here stating that Sanders supporters are not welcome at today’s Moral Mondays march. This is a lie.

    The march is organized by Reverend William Barber’s Moral Mondays movement, through the North Carolina NAACP — which does not endorse candidates. They cannot endorse. The march is about voting rights and justice.

    This post […]

    That post is no longer available — the site managers removed it because it is false.

    […] states outright that Sanders supporters have been “told” not to show up. This is flat-out bullshit.

    Those of us committed to the Moral Mondays movement and Rev. Barber apologize to him, to the movement, to HKonJ (Historic Thousands on Jones Street), the NAACP, and all the progressive activists who are marching today that this false message was recommended here. Daily Kos members are at the March — and it makes no difference which candidate they support: the march is not about that. […]

    This is ugly, Get the partisan bullshit away from one of the most powerful fusion movements happening in the U.S.

    Daily Kos link

  157. slithey tove (twas brillig (stevem)) says

    argh derailing slightly, to express myself, unrelated to any previous comments in this thread but in the same subject….
    Trump in inconceivable. I confess that I can’t believe he actually thinks anything he is saying is actually his attitude. He is exploiting his ability to throw shit at the wall and see what sticks. The disgusting thing is not the shit he is throwing but the fact it doesn’t just stick to the wall but the wall is grabbing for it and asking for more. Conflating his NH win with Bern’s, which a pundit summarized as “anti-establishment” attitude of the voters, is mostly the motivation for this rant.
    uhmm, the reason for the use of the “confession” word above: Trump is just throwin the shit around, meaning Trump ain’t as moronic as he projects himself to be, he too is confused by the enthusiastic response he got. Which lead to that disguised insult hypothetical about committing murder with many witnesses and not losing a single vote. He was not proclaiming his value as a candidate, but insulting his followers for following him regardless of horrific acts he my undertake.
    He’s still a total a-hole and is famous as one, the horror is not the fame for assholishness but the election results and continued ascendancy up the election “ladder”.
    Frustrating.
    as anti-establishment as I am, I cannot understand anti-establishment voting for a speedhead throwing shit to illustrate how deluded the public is by greedy politikians[sic]. I’d rather vote for the old idealist Bern who at least has reasonable ideas for the proper function of government rather than a ahole who just likes to throw shit at everyone around him.
    sheesh, that rant went longer than expected, move along. nuthin to c here

  158. says

    Here’s another “oh, FFS!” moment, which I summarize in order to reduce the number of laptops being subjected to defenestration:

    […] I think if President Obama was president in the 1930s he’d probably thank the Japanese for bombing Pearl Harbor.

    Yep, mucho ridiculous we-hate-Obama speech is still oozing from Fox News hosts. The quoted text is from Jesse Watters, co-host of Fox News’ “The Five.”

  159. says

    slithey tove @180, I agree. Seeing people pick up Trump’s shit and carry it home for veneration is what I find most frustrating.

    The pundits who repeat the “outsider” meme are engaging in a facile analysis that does not hold up under scrutiny.

  160. says

    A thoughtful look at infrastructure in the USA:

    […] The near-total failure of our political institutions to invest for the future, eschewing what doesn’t yield the quick payoff, political and physical, has left us with hopelessly clogged traffic, at risk of being on a bridge that collapses, or on a train that flies off defective rails, or with rusted pipes carrying our drinking water. Broadband is our new interstate highway system, but not everyone has access to it—a division largely based on class. Depending on the measurement used, the United States ranks from fourteenth to thirtieth among all nations in its investments in infrastructure. The wealthiest nation on earth is nowhere near the top. […]

    That’s an excerpt from “A Country Breaking Down” by Elizabeth Drew. The article is in the New York Review of Books.

  161. says

    Poor Ted Cruz. He is a Senator from Texas, but several Texas newspapers have not only refused to endorse him for president, they have endorsed other Republican candidates.

    The Dallas Morning News endorsed Kasich.

    As much as we’d like to see a Texan in the White House, we fear that Cruz’s brand of politics is more about disruption than governing and threatens to take the Republican Party to a dark place.

    The Houston Chronicle endorsed Jeb Bush.

    […] either [Cruz or Trump] would be disastrous for the Republican Party, disastrous for the nation.

    The San Antonio Express endorsed Jeb Bush.

    The Houston Chronicle is Cruz’s hometown paper. That’s gotta hurt. Again, we see the people who know him best rejecting Cruz.

  162. Sean Boyd says

    Breaking news from the USAian political world: Antonin Scalia died today at a resort in Texas. So, coming soon: trying to confirm a new Supreme Court justice during an election year with a Senate not likely to want to do so.

  163. Tethys says

    Anton Scalia is dead. I feel like a horrible person for being happy over it, but considering how much his awful opinions have damaged my country for the past few decades it is good news. Hooray, Obama will get to appoint another Supreme Court Justice.Scalia found Dead at Texas Ranch

  164. says

    Scalia was 79 years old, so I suppose his death is not all that surprising. This will definitely bring the subject of Supreme Court appointees to the forefront of political discussions.

    It is unlikely that President Obama will be allowed by the Republicans to choose a new justice. The Court will probably limp along with 8 justices until after the new president is sworn in.

    It is highly likely that Republican candidates will be invigorated by this. They will push harder to elect a Republican so that a conservative justice can be chosen to replace Scalia.

  165. Sean Boyd says

    @187 Lynna, OM: So a good question might be, then, does President Obama attempt to push a nomination through the Senate, or does he let it ride, knowing that it’s not gonna happen?

  166. Tethys says

    I can’t find any legal requirements for appointing a new justice. I’m sure the repubs will do everything possible to drag their heels until after the election, but I’m hoping that Obama has actually been waiting for just such an eventuality and already has a nominee, and a plan to get them installed ASAP.

  167. tomh says

    hoping that Obama has actually been waiting for just such an eventuality and already has a nominee, and a plan to get them installed ASAP.

    With a majority, Republicans can just reject a nominee. Since the Senate is in recess until February 22nd, Obama could make a recess appointment to the Court that would last until the end of the year. To say the least, this would be controversial, particularly in light of the recent SC decision striking down as unconstitutional three recess appointments made by Obama.

  168. says

    Josh Marshall predicted Republican obstructionism:

    As I noted in my post below, immediately after hearing of Justice Scalia’s death, I had doubts that Republicans could resist the urge from their party’s extremists to refuse to vote on a Supreme Court nomination this year.

    As we’ve seen from threatened debt defaults, routine government shutdowns and even the cooked up impeachment of a President going on two decades ago, there simply isn’t any institutionalist juice left in the GOP to resist yet another norm-violating power grab. And the truth is they’ve paid no price for the various other examples. Indeed, it is a sign of how far we’ve come that even mainstream Court watchers like SCOTUSBlog treated it as a given that Senate Republicans would take this course.

    Right out of the gate, conservatives were insisting that Republicans not allow President Obama to nominate another Justice to the High Court. And just moments ago, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced that he would not allows such a vote to be held. So, in essence, this debate over whether to keep this seat vacant for likely as long as a year and a half lasted about an hour.

  169. blf says

    The current “government”-of-loons in Poland has its panties in a twist, Polish move to strip Holocaust expert of award sparks protests:

    Princeton University professor Jan Tomasz Gross faces losing Order of Merit over comments Polish villagers were complicit in massacre of Jews

    Academics have rallied to the defence of one of the world’s leading Holocaust historians after reports that Poland intends to strip him of a national honour because he claimed that Poles were complicit in Nazi war crimes.

    Princeton University professor Jan Tomasz Gross, 69, was awarded the Order of Merit of the Republic of Poland in 1996. He is best known for his 2001 book Neighbors, which describes in graphic detail the 1941 massacre by Polish villagers of up to 1,600 Jewish men, women and children. […]

    The move against the historian comes as the nationalist Law and Justice government, elected in 2015, comes under European scrutiny for law changes that, critics say, threaten democracy. [P]resident Andrzej Duda signed into law a controversial move bringing the attorney general under the control of the justice ministry. Critics say this will put political pressure on the judiciary.

    Intellectuals who in the past few days have signed two open letters in Gross’s defence say the Law and Justice government wants to rewrite history, expunging any suggestion of Polish complicity in past horrors.

    “The government says Gross is unpatriotic. But he is a patriot who looks at both the darker and lighter periods in Polish history,’’ said University of Ottawa history professor Jan Grabowski, who is among 30 signatories of the first letter, published last week.

    Gross was born in Poland but left the country in 1969 after an antisemitic purge on dissidents. Last September, in an article published in Germany’s Die Welt newspaper, he lamented eastern European countries’ reluctance to accept refugees and asserted that Poles killed more Jews than they did Nazis during the second world war. Prosecutors in Warsaw decided to investigate whether Gross had broken laws prohibiting the defamation of Poland.

    “Gross is controversial, but it is stupid and harmful to consider removing his award,’’ said Dariusz Stola, director of Warsaw’s Polin Museum of the History of Polish Jews, who signed the second open letter, submitted to the Polish Press Agency on Friday.

    Stola said Duda should bear in mind the broad context of Gross’s work, which included valuable studies of the German and Russian occupations of Poland. “He was awarded the Order of Merit for his scholarly work but also for his contribution, while in exile, to the democratic transition,’’ said Stola. “These are achievements you cannot take away.”

  170. blf says

    Quoted in @166: “An aide to Cruz said that he decided to lift his hold [in the Senate on Presidental nominations] because he feels that after seven months that the American people are very aware of the negative consequences of [the Iran nuclear] deal.”

    Snickers. Yeah, sure. Slightly more likely, because the crud realized (or was convinced by someone — is there anyone? — he listens to) that it was making him look like a wozzack.

    Somewhat more likely, he was told to drop it by his paymasters.

    (I suspect his real motivation is something else — and since this is teh crud, something that benefits him personally — but can’t quite put my finger on what it might be.)

    Isn’t teh robot still “Hold”ing a bunch of nominations in protest at defrosting of relations with Cuba?

  171. blf says

    I think if President Obama was president in the 1930s he’d probably thank the Japanese for bombing Pearl Harbor.

    The actual attack being in 1941. Faux & Kockroach Bros., UnLimited, “Facts Loose”™©.

  172. says

    blf @195, couldn’t help but notice that right-wingers in Poland do the same thing that right-wingers in the USA do: they equate “patriotism” with making themselves look better than anyone else, with whitewashing history, etc. They equate “unpatriotic” with “anything that makes us look bad” and with being factually correct when it comes to history.

    They may like the bubble they live in, but the air in there must get stale.

    In other news, here are just some of the lies that Republican candidates for president told during the debate last night:

    […] JEB BUSH: “Russia is not taking out ISIS. They’re attacking our team.”

    DONALD TRUMP: “Jeb is so wrong. You’ve got to fight ISIS first. … We’ve been in the Middle East for 15 years, and we haven’t won anything. We’ve spent $5 trillion in the Middle East.”

    THE FACTS: Both spoke with too broad a brush. Russia is bombing both the Islamic State group and Western-backed rebels. But the U.S. and its partners say the majority of Russia’s strikes haven’t targeted IS fighters, and that its most recent offensive near Aleppo is primarily hitting “moderate” opposition forces.

    As with most things in Syria, however, the picture is unclear because some of the moderates are fighting alongside other extremist groups, like the al-Qaida-linked Nusra Front.

    Trump’s figure for total U.S. expenditures in the Middle East, though, appears significantly inflated. In November, Trump cited a $2 trillion figure. That number roughly matches the amount of money the U.S. spent fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq between 2001 and 2015, according to the bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
    —————–
    CRUZ on a failed 2013 immigration overhaul: “I stood with (Sen.) Jeff Sessions and (Rep.) Steven King and the American people to defeat that amnesty plan. The question for anyone on illegal immigration is, where were you in that fight?”

    RUBIO: “When that issue was being debated, Ted Cruz at a committee hearing very passionately said, ‘I want immigration reform to pass, I want people to be able to come out of the shadows.’ He proposed an amendment that would have legalized people here. … So he either wasn’t telling the truth then, or he isn’t telling the truth now.”

    THE FACTS: Rubio’s account is mostly right. While Cruz has been against an explicit path to citizenship for people in the country illegally, he did introduce legislation in that 2013 bill that proposed eventual legal status for millions of people. He also publicly supported the legislation in the Senate and urged its passing.

    He has since said his amendment was designed to help kill the broader bill. The immigration bill co-authored by Rubio failed to pass in the House.

    Does it strike anyone else as faintly ridiculous that Cruz and Rubio are fighting over who can be the most inhumane when addressing the issue of undocumented immigrants?

    RUBIO: “Our economy is flat, it’s not creating jobs the way it once did.”

    THE FACTS: While the recovery after the Great Recession has at times been sluggish, in the past two years job creation has been healthy. In 2014, employers added 3 million jobs, the most in 15 years. Job creation slowed to 2.7 million last year — still, the second-most since 1999.

    Oh, Marco Robot, you make this so easy for us.

    CRUZ: “The nonpartisan Tax Foundation estimated (my) simple flat tax that would produce 4.9 million new jobs, it would increase capital investment by 44 percent and would lift everyone’s income by double digits.”

    THE FACTS: That’s a selective reading of the foundation’s analysis, which found that his plan would reduce tax revenues by $3.6 trillion over 10 years, requiring massive spending cuts or hugely increasing federal budget deficits.

    The right-leaning group did conclude that the plan would generate more jobs and growth. It assumed that the tax cuts would generate significant additional economic growth and therefore more revenue, an approach that not all economists agree with.

    But even taking that potential extra revenue into account, the foundation still concludes Cruz’s plan would lower revenue by $768 billion over the next 10 years.

    TRUMP on Bush: “He put so much debt on Florida, and he increased spending so much, as soon as he got out of office, Florida crashed.”

    THE FACTS: Trump is right that Florida’s economy tanked right after Bush left office, but he’s wrong about the reasons. The state was clobbered by the housing bubble and bust that eventually dragged the whole country into the worst recession since the 1930s.

    The bubble was particularly harsh in the “sun and sand” states of Florida, Arizona, Nevada and California. […]

    BEN CARSON: “When we have a debt of that nature, it causes the Fed to change their policy. It causes the central bank to keep the rates low, and who does that affect? Mr. Average, who used to go to the bank every Friday and put part of his check in the bank and watch it grow over three decades and be able to retire with a nice nest egg.”

    THE FACTS: Carson misreads how the Federal Reserve works.

    The size of the U.S. government’s debt, which is about $19 trillion, does not influence the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policies. The Fed seeks to keep unemployment low and inflation at about 2 percent a year.

    Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke cut the short-term interest rate the Fed controls to nearly zero in December 2008 — before Barack Obama took office — and kept it that way for seven years.

    It is true that the policy has significantly lowered the interest rates on bank savings accounts, but many savers have benefited in other ways. The S&P 500 stock market index nearly tripled from March 2009, when the market bottomed during the Great Recession, through the end of 2015.

    Link.

    In answering a question about Scalia’s death, Ben Carson also said that the mandate for the President to nominate Supreme Court justices was not in the Constitution. The moderates let that pass at the time, but corrected the mistake later, noting that the Constitution states that the President shall nominate and that the Senate shall “advise and consent.”

    Carson’s ignorance is astounding.

  173. says

    Moment of unintentional humor from the Republican debate:

    Donald Trump said: “You can’t lie and then hold up the bible, OK?”

    He was referring to Ted Cruz, but, really, the self-delusion factor is funny.

  174. says

    During the Republican debate, the candidates interrupted each other, shouted at each other, ignored the moderators and generally behaved like middle school kids on a sugar high, with no adults present. To get a taste of how awful it was, see the video posted by Think Progress.

    In addition to that moment, Trump was particularly intent on insulting Jeb Bush and on interrupting him constantly. Trump did it so much that the audience booed him several times.

  175. blf says

    Lynna@198, At the moment, I myself broadly consider the current Polish-wazzocks to be the “best” suggestive-example of a thugist “government” in the States, albeit without the nuclear weapons (massive military) or economic clout. The previous Canadian “government” is possibly another example, albeit they failed on sheer nastiness scale. (At the moment I am only considering governments in broadly-“democratic” countries, which rules out places like Russia, the bigger China, and the apartheid states of former South Africa and the current Israel.)

    As such, it is not at all surprising the Polish and USArseholian thugs sound very similar. (Of course, this is somewhat circular reasoning…)

  176. says

    Mother Jones did us a service by posting five of the most memorable moments from the Republican debate. At least this approach shortens the amount of hell-on-earth we have to live through if we want to hear what the candidates have to say.

    There’s both text and videos at the link.

  177. redwood says

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a politician blatantly lie as much as Ted Cruz. He doesn’t seem to care if what he says is true or not, only if it fits his purposes. That’s truly scary, especially if he believes that God condones everything he does because he’s on the “right” side.

  178. says

    Jamelle Bouie’s take on the Republican debate:

    If you watched Thursday’s Democratic presidential debate, you saw a calm, wonky, and civil discussion between two presidential candidates. If you watched Saturday’s Republican debate, you saw the opposite. You saw a brawl. And the instigator—the man who turned a debate about leading the country into a cage match—was Donald Trump.

    Trump had a single strategy for the night: Attack, attack, and attack. Early in the debate, he blasted Jeb Bush for his national security plans, specifically criticizing how Bush would go about fighting both ISIS and the Syrian regime. “You can’t fight two wars at one time. You listen to him, and you listen to some of the folks that I’ve been listening to—[…] we haven’t won anything,” he said, the first of many jabs at the former Florida governor. […]

    “George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes. But that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the Middle East.”

    […] The majority of Americans think the Iraq war was a bad decision and, until recently, gave low ratings to George W. Bush. Trump was speaking to them. Unfortunately for the real estate magnate, this isn’t the general election. He still needs to win the Republican nomination, and Republicans still favor the Iraq war and President Bush. […]

    This was the pattern for the night. Trump would attack, with reckless swings at everyone on stage (but especially Jeb Bush), and his targets would attempt to push back, all arguing on his terms. Bolstering this free for all was the audience, which clapped, and booed, and encouraged the pitched battle between the remaining candidates.

    “You are single biggest liar,” said Trump in a heated exchange with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

    Oh, I see. That’s better Mr. Trump. Cruz is the biggest liar in a bunch of liars, including you.

    If you were watching the Republican debate to get a read on policy and plans, you were disappointed. The entire occasion—all two hours—were consumed by this death match of a presidential debate.[…]

  179. says

    A few more scary (and a few reasonable) moments from the Republican debate:

    [Marco Rubio said] Someone on this stage will get to choose the balance of the Supreme Court, and it will begin by filling this vacancy that’s there now, and we need to put people on the bench that understand the constitution is not a living and breathing document. It is to be interpreted as originally meant.
    ——–
    [Jeb Bush said] We want a strong executive for sure. But in return for that, there should be a consensus orientation on that nomination, and there’s no doubt in my mind that Barack Obama will not have a consensus pick when he submits that person to the senate.
    ————-
    [Kasich said after watching one of the arguments between other candidates] I gotta tell you. This is just crazy, huh? This is just nuts. Okay. Oh, man. These attacks, some of them are personal. I think we’re fixing to lose the election to Hillary Clinton if we don’t stop this.
    ——————
    [Kasich said] But here’s what’s interesting about Medicaid. You know who expanded Medicaid five times to try to help the folks and give them opportunities so that they could rise and get a job? President Ronald Reagan.
    ————-
    [Jeb Bush said] But if you want to talk about weakness, you want to talk about weakness, it’s weak to disparage women. It’s weak to disparage Hispanics. It’s weak to denigrate the disabled. And it’s really weak to call John McCain a loser, because he was a P.O.W.

  180. blf says

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a politician blatantly lie as much as Ted Cruz.

    Tricky Dickie, Ford, Carter, Teagun, Bush I, Clinton I, Cheney, and Obama aren’t liars? Please adjust your reality…

  181. says

    Polygamist mormons in Utah use the children of the cultists to help them perpetrate frauds.

    The storage tanks Washakie Renewable Energy was planning to build […] weren’t for biofuel Washakie actually made. […] They were for the biofuel Washakie planned to buy.

    Buying biofuel wouldn’t allow Washakie to qualify for all the government benefits of making its own, but the company had a solution for that […]

    Washakie brought children to the office near 3900 South and 700 East in South Salt Lake to help forge documents to make it appear as though the company was in compliance […] The documents, including bills of lading and laboratory reports, would go into the files in anticipation of IRS audits.

    “They would have their 9- and 10-year-old kids come in and make the forms,” Brown [Amanda Brown, former employee] told The Salt Lake Tribune.

    Washakie has connections to the Kingston group — the polygamous sect known for its fundamentalist Mormon beliefs and history of child abuse and forced marriages. Those connections were on display Wednesday when agents from the IRS and the Environmental Protection Agency served search warrants […]

    The EPA in 2011 accused Washakie of reaping the rewards of federal programs meant to lessen U.S. reliance on fossil fuels, without actually producing the renewable biofuels — made from grease, animal fat and other oil wastes — it claimed to have manufactured.

    Meanwhile, Washakie, also known as WRE Group, has become one of Utah’s highest-profile companies — a frequent advertiser at Utah Jazz games, on local TV stations and at Megaplex Theatres. […]

    Salt Lake Tribune line.

  182. says

    Hillary Clinton’s comments regarding appointing a replacement for Justice Scalia:

    The longest successful confirmation process in the last four decades was Clarence Thomas, and that took roughly 100 days. There are 340 days until the next president takes office, so there is plenty of time.

    Well then some might say, “Well yes, but this is an election year.” Okay, but the confirmation for Justice Kennedy took place in 1988. That was an election year, and he was confirmed 97-0.

    So, as a presidential candidate, a former law professor, a recovering lawyer—and, frankly a citizen—to hear comments like those of Leader Mitch McConnell this evening is very disappointing. It is totally out of step with our history and our constitutional principles.

  183. says

    Ted Cruz said some more stupid stuff about nominating a Supreme Court justice:

    Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said Sunday that he would filibuster any name President Barack Obama put forth to replace Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. […]

    George Stephanopoulos asked Cruz on ABC’s “This Week” if he would filibuster Obama’s nomination.

    “Absolutely. This should be a decision for the people, George. We’ve got an election,” Cruz said. “And, you know, Democrats — I cannot wait to stand on that stage with Hillary Clinton or with Bernie Sanders and take the case to the people, what vision of the Supreme Court do you want?”

    “Let the election decide it,” Cruz continued. “If the Democrats want to replace this nominee, they need to win the election.”

    To a man, I think the Republicans are sure that their party will win the 2016 election and we will have a Republican president. Well, John Kasich may have his doubts, but the remainder of the candidates are counting on winning the election. I don’t think they should be that confidents.

  184. says

    What Bernie Sanders said about nominating a Supreme Court justice:

    “President Obama, in my view, should make that nomination,” Sanders said on ABC’s “This Week.” “I hope he does it as soon as possible and I hope that the Senate confirms and begins deliberations as soon as possible.”

  185. says

    The editors of Salon weigh in on replacing Scalia, and on Scalia’s legacy:

    It’s ironic, to say the least, that the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia, a man known for the legal doctrine of “originalism,” would immediately lead the majority leader of the Senate to declare that no nominee to replace him would be confirmed until a new president is inaugurated in a year’s time.

    The founders would very likely scratch their heads in wonder at Mitch McConnell’s odd statement that “the American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice, therefore this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” They would likely point out that the American people did have a voice in that decision in 2012, when they voted for Barack Obama for a four year term. There’s nothing in the Constitution that says after three years the president is no longer authorized to nominate Supreme Court Justices. […]

    What’s startling about McConnell’s statement is the fact that he said it so openly. It’s another example of the reckless disregard of political norms, traditions and the rule of law by the modern GOP. In the old days, they would have at least paid lip service to the idea that a president is obligated to nominate Supreme Court justices and the Senate is obligated to fulfill its advise-and-consent role. Sure, they would delay the nomination, but to just announce upfront that they have no intention of following the usual procedure is a new thing. They don’t even pretend to care about preserving the integrity of the institution.

    Last night in the GOP debate, all the candidates backed up McConnell. It would seem they too believe that even the pretense of normal constitutional processes is no longer necessary. This will be good to keep in mind as they bray incessantly about President Obama’s use of executive orders as if they were acts of treason. (By the way, his use of Executive Orders is right in line with all modern presidents, including Republicans.) […]

    The article goes on to discuss Bush v. Gore in detail, including the fact that Scalia claimed over and over that the decision was 7-2, when in fact there were four dissenting opinions.

  186. says

    What Ruth Bader Ginsburg said about Justice Scalia:

    Toward the end of the opera Scalia/Ginsburg, tenor Scalia and soprano Ginsburg sing a duet: “We are different, we are one,” different in our interpretation of written texts, one in our reverence for the Constitution and the institution we serve.

    From our years together at the D.C. Circuit, we were best buddies. We disagreed now and then, but when I wrote for the Court and received a Scalia dissent, the opinion ultimately released was notably better than my initial circulation. Justice Scalia nailed all the weak spots-the “applesauce” and “argle bargle”-and gave me just what I needed to strengthen the majority opinion.

    He was a jurist of captivating brilliance and wit, with a rare talent to make even the most sober judge laugh. The press referred to his “energetic fervor,” “astringent intellect,” “peppery prose,” “acumen,” and “affability,” all apt descriptions. He was eminently quotable, his pungent opinions so clearly stated that his words never slipped from the reader’s grasp.

    Justice Scalia once described as the peak of his days on the bench an evening at the Opera Ball when he joined two Washington National Opera tenors at the piano for a medley of songs. He called it the famous Three Tenors performance. He was, indeed, a magnificent performer. It was my great good fortune to have known him as working colleague and treasured friend.

    What Justice Scalia said about Justice Ginsburg:

    She likes opera, and she’s a very nice person. What’s not to like? Except her views on the law.

    Slate link.

    Statements from other justices are also posted at the Slate link.

  187. says

    It’s enough to make you mad. Corporations cheat on their taxes, finding ways to get around the relatively lax U.S. tax codes.

    […] Thanks to Citizens for Tax Justice, we know that 15 companies in the Fortune 500 earned a collective $23 billion in profits in 2014, yet their corporate income tax bill that year was—you can probably guess where this is going—zero. (The federal government actually paid rebates to all but two of them). […]

    Those 15 companies netted a cool $23 billion in profits in 2014, and yet, collectively, they didn’t just pay nothing in corporate income taxes—they received $731 million back from the government. Furthermore, from 2010 through 2014 their collective profits amounted to $107 billion, yet together they paid a paltry $1.7 billion in corporate income taxes—an infinitesimal rate of 1.6 percent. […]

    It’s hard to keep track of the manifold different ways corporations avoid taxes. To name just a few, there’s accelerated depreciation, through which companies can defer taxes by claiming that an asset they purchased is losing value more quickly than it actually is; deducting stock options issued to company execs; or simply parking earnings overseas (Fortune 500 companies have stashed $2.1 trillion abroad […])

    […] Corporate tax inversions. […] That’s when a U.S. company—Pfizer announced such a deal late last year—buys a foreign rival in the same industry and locates the newly merged company in the country where its former rival is located. Why do this? To take advantage of the lower corporate tax rates in that country.

    Other than holding a couple of confabs in […] Ireland, nothing else about the company changes. It is no less a U.S. company in any material sense than it was the day before the merger. But now, the rest of us have to make up for the taxes that company should have paid on its profits—profits earned thanks in large part to investments we’ve made collectively in infrastructure, education, etc., not to mention a legal system that protects the company’s patents. […]

    Angry yet? […]earnings stripping. It’s a tactic available not only to companies that have performed an inversion, but to any non-U.S. company that earns any money within our borders.

    The company essentially borrows money from itself, but on paper it’s actually the part or subsidiary within the company that’s located in the U.S. borrowing the money from parts located abroad. Since the U.S.-based part pays interest on that debt, it can use those interest payments to offset profits earned here. With a stroke of the pen, and no actual money leaving the corporation, its U.S. profits—and thus its tax bill—have up and vanished like a fart in the wind […]

    Our tax laws were designed to tax the profits of companies operating in America. Making those profits disappear through accounting maneuvers is about as honest as the three-card monte guy hustling tourists […]

    Corporate tax cheating […] rewards dishonesty, and encourages a broader corporate culture of seeing government-issued rules as obstacles to get around […] bigger companies—which are much more likely to be international—gain a yooooge […] advantage over smaller, domestic-only competitors that can’t muck around by shifting money abroad. Why would we want a tax policy that disadvantages smaller businesses, given that companies generally create fewer jobs the bigger they get?

    Link.

    The article goes on to offer a solution, but I have my doubts about it.

  188. says

    Donald Trump wants you to know that the reason people booed him so frequently during the Republican debate is not because he was acting like rude asshat. No that couldn’t be it.

    Loved the debate last night, and almost everyone said I won, but the RNC did a terrible job of ticket distrbution. All donors & special ints … Tickets for future debates should be put out to the general public instead of being given to the lobbyists & special interests – the bosses!

    Yeah, right. The audience was full of donors and that’s why Trump was booed. Not buying it.

    The quoted text is from two tweets Trump posted.

  189. says

    Elizabeth Warren responded to Republicans:

    Abandoning their Senate duties would also prove that all the Republican talk about loving the Constitution is just that – empty talk.

  190. Nick Gotts says

    To a man, I think the Republicans are sure that their party will win the 2016 election and we will have a Republican president. Well, John Kasich may have his doubts, but the remainder of the candidates are counting on winning the election. I don’t think they should be that confidents. – Lynna, OM@210

    No, they shouldn’t – but nor should the liberal/progressive/Democrat people I see online absolutely sure that Trump, or Cruz, or any and all Republican candidates can’t possily beat Clinton (or Sanders, or either). Investors and financiers across the globe have the jitters, the EU staggers from crisis to crisis, we’re alarmingly close to a Russo-Turkish war (haven’t had one of those since 1918) – the rest of the world doesn’t stop because the USA is holding a presidential election, and neither the Republican Congress nor the Supremes can make it.

  191. says

    Alex Jones thinks President Obama murdered Justice Scalia, and he thinks that Obama plans to murder Trump next.

    Jones is a powerful voice on the extreme rightwing. Expect this latest conspiracy theory to gain a foothold, and then metastasize. I mean, it makes perfect sense, right (sarcasm).

    […] You just get used to this, Scalia found, it’s natural, nothing going on here, he just died naturally. And you’re like, “Whoa. Red flag.” Then you realize, Obama is one vote away from being able to ban guns, open the borders and actually have the court engage in its agenda and now Scalia dies. I mean, this is hard core […]

    Link

  192. says

    Ben Carson dipped in the rightwing swamp of fake quotes to come up with a reference to Stalin. Carson did that during the debate, but there were so many other moments-of-madness that it went largely unnoticed.

    In his closing remarks during Saturday’s Republican debate, Carson claimed Stalin had identified three aspects of the American character one must undermine in order to bring down the USA: our spirituality, our patriotism, and our morality.

    There no evidence Stalin ever articulated any such trifecta. The first reference to the quote appears roughly 30 years after Stalin’s death, and massive online databases devoted to aggregating all of Stalin’s speeches and writings turn up no matching quotes. Further, as Snopes points out, it would be an oddly pro-America statement for Stalin to make, with its subtext being that American spirituality, patriotism, and morality are distinct, powerful, and unique.

    New Republic link.

  193. says

    Marco Robot Rubio is infamous for not showing up to do his job as a Senator. His absentee rate is over 60%, far exceeding every other senator. Despite that fact, all of you taxpayers in the USA shell out $60,000 for Rubio to have a speech writer on his staff.

    How many speeches has Rubio given on the Senate floor? Eight since January 2015. For some perspective on those 8 speeches, other senators have racked up more than 100 speeches since January 2015.

    To be fair, the speechwriter also edits Rubio’s press releases, letters etc.

  194. says

    Katrina Pierson is the top spokesperson for Donald Trump. We have been flabbergasted by what she is willing to say on camera, online, and in public before. She made hateful comments about Muslims; wore a necklace made of bullets and threatened to wear one featuring a fetus; and she collected $11,000 in unemployment when she worked on Ted Cruz’s senate campaign.

    Katrina’s lastest online postings include:

    9/11 … An inside job?

    How can even Trump think that this woman is suitable as a spokesperson?

    Katrina Pierson has taught “Agenda 21” conspiracy theory to Tea Partiers all over the USA. Agenda 21 is the conspiracy theory that claims the UN will force people into the equivalent of internment camps, etc. Michele Bachmann subscribes to this theory too, one aspect of which is that President Obama will become head of the UN and will use it as his platform to rule the world as the Antichrist.

    Here is one of Bachmann’s latest insane rants against President Obama.

  195. says

    Jeb Bush said some more stupid stuff about choosing a replacement for Justice Scalia. This is in addition to the stupid stuff he said during the debate on Saturday night.

    It’s up to Mitch McConnell in the Senate. I’m not a senator. I’m not running for the United States Senate. If he’s going to take that path, I’ll respect that completely. What shouldn’t happen in a election year, a president in a very divisive kind of time, should [not] nominate someone and have it be passed. There shouldn’t be deference to the executive.

    I am taking a position. If there is an up-or-down vote, it should be rejected based on the history of how President Obama selects judges. If there’s no vote, that’s fine too.

    What I’m saying is there shouldn’t be — an Obama justice should not be appointed in an election year. Let this be an important part of the election process because there’s a lot riding on this.

  196. blf says

    Re @221, I don’t know what precisely a “speech given on the Senate floor” is, but with that caveat, meh. So what if the robot has only given eight and some others an order of magnitude more? Those 100-times speakers could easily be bloviating eejits (and I’m inclined to think probably are, as a general tendency).

    I’d be far more interested in what was (and was not) said, and done; votes (and votes missed); and so on. It’s like flip-flopping, it isn’t the fact it was done / wasn’t given, but the rationale (reasons) and actions / inactions. One, two, a dozen well-considered speeches is easily potentially far more valuable. Of course, if those one, two, dozen are bloviations, that would be useful to know. In this case, with teh badly-programmed robot, I assume the eight were variants of +++ NEED MOAR CASH ERROR +++ and +++ OBAMA MAKES ME FROTHING ERROR +++ with an occasional +++ TAPE JAMMED ERROR +++.

  197. says

    Oh, FFS. Rand Paul is no longer a candidate for president, but he has weighed in heavily on the Republican side of the argument about a replacement for Justice Scalia. While doing so, Paul said a bunch of stupid stuff.

    […] he believes Obama “has a conflict of interest” in appointing somebody to fill the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat.

    […] he believes Obama has too many of his own policies at stake before the high court — his executive actions on immigration and climate change regulations, for example.

    “[…] I think the president sort of has a conflict of interest here in appointing somebody while we’re trying to decide whether or not he’s usurped power.” […]

    “It’s going to be very, very, very difficult to get me to vote for a presidential nomination from this president,” he said. […]

    Paul also said because of this “emotional time with the president trying to usurp so many of Congress’s powers,” it would be “difficult to believe that there wont be a filibuster over this.” […]

    “Were not going to take it lying down and let the president have his way without one heck of a fight,” Paul said.

    Think Progress link.

  198. says

    If you are a Republican, I guess you could say that some of Rubio’s speeches before the Senate were not just bloviating.

    He opposed President Obama’s policies toward Israel (bloviating to my mind). Mainly, he was upset because President Obama was not spending more time in Israel, and was not sucking up to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

    He gave a speech in which he said government officials should be fired for not doing their jobs, thus breaking irony meters nationwide.

    He gave a speech opposing the nuclear deal with Iran.

    He gave a speech asking that Department of Veterans Affairs leaders fire poor-performing employees more quickly. He was against due process for all workers.

    He gave an anti-Obamacare speech.

  199. says

    About Justice Scalia’s “originalist” approach to the Constitution:

    […] To law students who pointed out that it was the flexible, not the originalist approach that enabled Brown and other civil-rights breakthroughs, he’d reply that “Even Mussolini made the trains run on time,” or “Hitler developed a wonderful automobile. What does that prove? I’ll stipulate that you can reach some results you like with the other system. But that’s not the test.” In short, he never did reconcile originalism with Brown. And any legal philosophy that cannot be squared with that moral high point of the modern Supreme Court is fatally flawed. […]

    http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/postscript-antonin-scalia-1936-2016

  200. blf says

    Thanks, Lynna, for the rundown (@226) on what teh robot actually spoke on, which is far more interesting that the raw number of times he spoke. Several of those listed struck me as being essentially the speculated +++ OBAMA MAKES ME FROTHING ERROR +++ program.

    For quite reliably-loony frothing, there is always teh wazzock. Now teh trum-prat is threatening, again, the national thugs-in-chief, Trump threatens third-party run over ‘unfair’ treatment by Republican party:

    Billionaire says national committee is ‘in default’ of pledge amid complaints that he spotted ‘special interest people’ in debate crowd on Saturday

    […]
    Trump, who was booed at a debate on Saturday, complained that the audience was full of “lobbyists and donors” whom he accused of manipulating his rivals. “Those tickets were all special interest people. I know ’em,” he said.

    “I signed a pledge but it’s a double-edge pledge, and as far as I’m concerned they’re in default of the pledge.”

    A spokesperson for the Republican National Committee told the Guardian: “The language of the pledge is pretty straightforward.”

    The pledge, he said, “simply states the candidates pledge to run as a Republican and support the nominee. Nothing more and nothing less.”

    The men and women in the audience were largely at the candidates’ discretion, according to the RNC: “Each candidate received 100 tickets which is the largest amount so far. The candidates as a whole were the largest group of ticket holders.”

    But Trump declared said “the pledge isn’t being honored by them”, without elaborating on what the Republican party’s obligations would be under the agreement. He said the debate was “a disgrace” and “the RNC does a terrible job”.

    In the past two debates, audiences booed Trump repeatedly […]. The Trump campaign has insisted that the audiences were packed with “donors and special interests”, a claim that has been repeatedly and vehemently denied by party leadership in the RNC.

    The Grauniad goes on to point out with the South Carolina primary happening in few days, it’s an odd threat to reissue: Teh wazzock is high in the polls there. It also seems a bit odd to me, since (or so it’s been reported) some “leading” thugs are no longer completely opposed to a trum-prat candidacy, mostly due to loathing teh crud even moar (a classic “an enemy of my enemy is my friend” false-dichotomy situation).

  201. says

    blf, The Wazzock in Chief made me laugh when started whining about being booed, and when he started threatening to run as a third party candidate.

    I remember him saying that all deals are negotiations, and all deals can be renegotiated. It looks like he wants to renegotiate his signed agreement with the RNC. I don’t think that will work. What does he want, debate audiences that, like his rallies, consist of mainly Trump supporters?

  202. says

    This is good news … I hope: President Obama and President Putin have agreed to work harder to get the diplomatic and military cooperation they need to implement a cease-fire in Syria. The two countries are also said to be cooperating more to get aid to civilians.

    In bad news, it looks like the Assad regime bombed another Doctors Without Borders hospital in Syria. Link

  203. says

    I hope Trump does everything he is currently threatening to do:

    1. Sue Ted Cruz for being born in Canada
    2. Sue Ted Cruz for lying about Ben Carson leaving the race in Iowa
    3. Sue Ted Cruz for “voter violation” mailers in Iowa
    4. Sue Ted Cruz for push-polling robocalls in South Carolina
    5. Run as a third-party candidate

    I mean, I’ve been waiting for an implosion for months now. Could we please just get on with it?

  204. says

    A Republican National committeewoman from Nevada, Diana Orrock, thinks that both Cruz and Rubio are not eligible to run for president.

    Orrock supports Trump. She has joined forces with another Republican woman, “Devvy Kidd,” to put a lot of anti-Cruz and anti-Rubio stuff online.

    […] Rubio is ineligible because she says his parents weren’t naturalized as American citizens until Rubio was four years old. She further argued that Cruz is ineligible because his father wasn’t a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth in Calgary, Alberta, although his mother was American.

    It has been generally accepted that both men are eligible to run for President, despite doubt from some people who consider themselves “strict constitutionalists.” The Congressional Research Service said in 2011 that a “natural born“ citizen is someone who was born in the U.S. or someone who was born abroad to at least one American parent. […]

    “I like a lot of what Mr. Trump is saying,” Orrock[said] “I’m throwing my support behind him because he appreciates my endorsement.”

    Link.

  205. says

    Scrutiny of the plan Bernie Sanders proposed for putting enough money in the pot to pay for free college tuition, etc. is increasing.

    […] Jared Bernstein, the former economic adviser to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. who is now at the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, examined a paper by the economist advising Mr. Sanders, Gerald Friedman of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, that is circulating on the left.

    While calling Mr. Friedman’s work a good effort, Mr. Bernstein cited several assumptions as “wishful thinking.” Among them were minimal health-cost inflation, economic growth reaching 5.3 percent and, in that heated-up economy, no action from the Federal Reserve to apply brakes. […]

    Jeb Bush and Chris Christie floated the promise of 4% growth, Scott Walker upped that to 4.5%. People made fun of them for that. Sanders at least has numbers and a plan to back up his 5.3% claims.

    Still, it is, as economist Goolsbee said, “magic flying puppies with winning Lotto tickets tied to their collars.” Here’s why: are there any modern presidents that can claim 4% or higher growth? No. None. Clinton, Obama, Reagan … none of them spurred growth to those levels. If they had done so, the Fed would have raised interest rates to cool inflation threats.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/16/us/politics/left-leaning-economists-question-cost-of-bernie-sanderss-plans.html

  206. says

    Taking a closer look at Republican voters in South Carolina, we can see why Trump is still polling at the head of the pack (35% to 38% depending on the poll):

    – 60% want a ban on Muslims entering the United States
    – 29% want to shut down mosques
    – 47% want to establish a national database of all Muslims
    – 25% want to outlaw Islam in the USA

  207. says

    Hillary Clinton barks like a dog:
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/hillary-clinton-barks-story-fact-checking-dog-36959259

    She postulated a fact-checking dog that would bark every time Republicans said something like, “The great recession was caused by too much regulation.”

    Not as big a deal as people are making it out to be.

    But the rightwing is having fun with it, calling Clinton “barking mad” and posting videos of Clinton supposedly barking when she was not doing so. Some included ageism: “Grandma barks like a dog for votes!” There are “speaking her native tongue” comments, and even worse: “If she looks like a dog and barks like a dog …”

  208. says

    On his All In show, Chris Hayes apologized for previously airing some of Bill Clinton’s remarks without proper context. He corrected the error.

    During the Friday segment, Hayes had played remarks made by Bill Clinton earlier that day about how he sees his wife Hillary Clinton as a “change-maker.”

    “She’s the best change-maker I’ve ever known. A lot of people say, oh well, you don’t understand. It’s different now. It’s rigged. Yeah, it’s rigged because you don’t have a president who is a change maker with a Congress who will work with him. But the president has done a better job than he has gotten credit for. And don’t you forget it!” Clinton said at a Tennessee Rally.

    “I’ve been there, and we shared the same gift. We only had a Democratic Congress for two years. And then we lost it,” Clinton continued. “Yet some of the loudest voices in my party said, it’s unbelievable, said “Well the only reason we had it for two years is that President Obama isn’t liberal enough!” Is there one soul in this crowd that believes that?”

    However, on his show, Hayes cut off Bill Clinton’s remarks after he said that the United States does not “have a president who is a change maker,” failing to include Clinton’s comments about Obama not getting enough credit […]

    On Monday night, Hayes acknowledged that he did not provide the context for Bill Clinton’s comments.

    “A number of people pointed out — quite a few actually, and rightly — that Clinton’s full remarks changed the context of that point, and that he actually went onto defend President Obama,” […]

  209. says

    This is a followup to comment 234.

    More on polling Republican voters inSouth Carolina:
    – 30% wish the South had won the Civil War, that goes up to 38% for Trump supporters.
    – 20% support banning homosexuals from entering the U.S., that goes up to 31% for Trump supporters.

    Trump’s support in South Carolina is built on a base of voters among whom religious and racial intolerance pervades. Among the beliefs of his supporters:

    -70% think the Confederate flag should still be flying over the State Capital [sic], to only 20% who agree with it being taken down. In fact 38% of Trump voters say they wish the South had won the Civil War to only 24% glad the North won and 38% who aren’t sure. Overall just 36% of Republican primary voters in the state are glad the North emerged victorious to 30% for the South, but Trump’s the only one whose supporters actually wish the South had won. […]

    More details are posted on Think Progress.

  210. says

    Oh, FFS. Venal behavior by coal company executives:

    A bankrupt coal company last month unveiled a plan to pay top executives up to $11.9 million in bonuses over six months as an apparent reward for slashing benefits for workers and dodging environmental clean-up obligations during bankruptcy proceedings. The company, Alpha Natural Resources, is one of the four largest coal companies in the U.S. and filed for bankruptcy last year. […]

    Link.

  211. says

    More spittle-flecked ranting from the rightwing about the upcoming Obama SCOTUS appointee:

    [Rafael] Cruz, the father of Texas senator and presidential candidate Ted Cruz, told [Pat} Robertson that President Obama may join the ranks of dictators like Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao Zedong who had “taken away the weapons of the people and then used them against the people.” […]

    “We must return to the Judeo-Christian, the biblical, the constitutional foundations that this country was built upon,” he said, “otherwise this country will be destroyed.”

    The elder Cruz then went on to say that Justice Antonin Scalia’s death could usher in America’s destruction: “This could tilt the balance of the court and could be something that would affect America for the next 30 years. We don’t have 30 years.”[…]

    Link

    The radical anti-abortion group Operation Rescue has joined the many conservative groups urging the Senate to hold the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s Supreme Court seat open for more than a year in order to prevent President Obama from naming his replacement.

    In a press release yesterday, Operation Rescue’s Troy Newman — a leader of Sen. Ted Cruz’s “pro-life” coalition — declared that with the Supreme Court battle, America […] is “just one Obama appointee away from totalitarian government.”

    The group also raised suspicions about the justice’s death, saying that “disturbing conflicting reports have surfaced” regarding the circumstances of his death. […]

    Link

    Donald Trump joined the conspiracy theorists in speculating about Scalia’s death:

    Earlier today, Donald Trump chatted with far-right radio host Michael Savage, who has been voicing doubts that Justice Antonin Scalia died of natural causes, suggesting that foul play was involved in the conservative jurist’s death.

    Savage, after wondering if Scalia was “murdered,” asked Trump if he would support a Warren Commission-style investigation into the justice’s death.

    Trump responded that while he doesn’t have enough information to comment on whether Scalia was murdered, he found it “pretty unusual” that the justice was discovered with “a pillow on his face.”

    Link

  212. says

    Marco Robot Rubio stumbled again. He used a scene from a boat crossing a harbor in Canada to illustrate his “morning again in America” campaign ad.
    http://www.buzzfeed.com/meganapper/opening-shot-in-rubios-morning-again-in-america-ad-appears-t#.jweXllEQK

    General dunderhead and like-minded robot Sam Brownback (governor of Kansas) endorsed Marco Rubio.

    “For people of faith, who care about religious liberty, life and marriage, it’s time for us to rally around Senator Ted Cruz,” said religious rightwing doofus James Dobson.

    The latest PPP poll shows Clinton leading Sanders 55% to 34%; but polls also show an upward trend for Sanders.

  213. says

    Cornel West posted his support for Bernie Sanders:

    The conventional wisdom holds that, in the Democratic primary, Hillary Clinton is the candidate who will win over African-American voters—that her rival, Bernie Sanders, performed well in Iowa and won New Hampshire on account of those states’ disproportionate whiteness, and that Clinton’s odds are better in the upcoming contests in South Carolina and Nevada, two highly diverse states.

    But in fact, when it comes to advancing Dr. King’s legacy, a vote for Clinton not only falls far short of the mark; it prevents us from giving new life to King’s legacy. Instead, it is Sanders who has championed that legacy in word and in deed for 50 years. This election is not a mere campaign; it is a crusade to resurrect democracy—King-style—in our time. In 2016, Sanders is the one leading that crusade. […]

    Daily Kos link

  214. says

    Ben Carson told the truth:

    Asked on WRNN 99.5 FM in South Carolina if his fellow candidates would say the same thing about waiting to nominate a new justice if there was a Republican president, Carson replied, “No, they wouldn’t.”

    BuzzFeed link

  215. says

    Yeah, not all Republicans are whacko when it comes to seeing President Obama nominate a replacement for Scalia:

    Alberto Gonzales, who served as attorney general under President George W. Bush, broke from Republican Party line by suggesting repeatedly over the weekend that a nomination to the Supreme Court to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia shouldn’t wait for the next president.

    “If the shoe were on the other foot, and there was a Republican in the White House and Democratically controlled Congress, I would expect the Republican president to make a nomination when ready of a qualified individual,” Gonzales said on the BBC. […]

    “I know there’s a big debate going on right now about whether or not Obama should nominate someone,” Gonzales said. “From my perspective having worked at the White House and then at the Department of Justice, there’s just no question in my mind that as president of the United States, you have an obligation to fill a vacancy.” […]

    Link.

  216. nahuati says

    How the disability voting bloc could swing the 2016 election

    “In an election where gender and race are both popular topics of discussion, there’s a silent but formidable group of voters that no one’s talking about: disabled voters.”

    “At last census, roughly 20% of the US population identified with some degree of disability, spanning a huge range of impairments across race, gender, age and class. Disabled people represent a huge electoral bloc, one Jim Dickson, the co-chair of the National Council on Independent Living’s voting rights subcomittee, contends is as formidable as other minority bloc voters.”

  217. says

    As we all know by now, right-wingers and religious nutters were really offended by Beyoncé’s performance at the Super Bowl.

    Are you offended as an American that Beyoncé pulled her race-baiting stunt at the Superbowl?

    Do you agree that it was a slap in the face to law enforcement?

    Do you agree that the Black Panthers was/is a hate group which should not be glorified?

    Come and let’s stand together. Let’s tell the NFL we don’t want hate speech & racism at the Superbowl ever again!

    Uh, yeah, not so much dunderheads. Nobody showed up for the protest.
    Link.

    The police set up some barriers and manned them … to protect NFL headquarters against no one.

  218. says

    Donald Trump told us already that he is all for waterboarding and worse forms of torture. He even sent his son out to tell reporters that waterboarding is “no different than what happens on college campuses and frat houses every day.”

    Trump does not want us to forget how much he likes the idea of torturing people. In today’s issue of USA Today, a op-ed from Trump says:

    Though the effectiveness of many of these methods may be in dispute, nothing should be taken off the table when American lives are at stake. The enemy is cutting off the heads of Christians and drowning them in cages, and yet we are too politically correct to respond in kind. […]

    I will do whatever it takes to protect and defend this nation and its people.

    Link

  219. says

    Donald Trump is still really hurt by his loss in Iowa. We can tell because he is still insulting Ted Cruz over and over again. Now Trump has added a new twist, demanding that the RNC intervene to discipline Cruz, and if the RNC fails to do that, well Trump considers that failure another reason to run as a third party candidate.

    Ted Cruz is a totally unstable individual. He is the single biggest liar I’ve ever come across, in politics or otherwise, and I have seen some of the best of them. His statements are totally untrue and completely outrageous. It is hard to believe a person who proclaims to be a Christian could be so dishonest and lie so much. […]

    [snipped a long list of Cruz’s supposed lies and sins.]
    Cruz says I am pro-choice, when in fact I am staunchly pro-life and have been for a long time. Like Ronald Reagan, on many issues, I have evolved.

    […]Cruz was responsible for getting Bush to put in the judge that failed to vote against ObamaCare twice. […]

    Cruz has become unhinged […] If Ted is going to continue to lie with such desperation, I have no choice but to fight back.

    One of the ways I can fight back is to bring a lawsuit against him relative to the fact that he was born in Canada and therefore cannot be President. If he doesn’t take down his false ads and retract his lies, I will do so immediately. Additionally, the RNC should intervene and if they don’t they are in default of their pledge to me.

    [snipped long list of Trump’s supposed virtues] I am the only person who will Make America Great Again.

    Link.

    Obsessive much?

  220. says

    The issue of support for solar power is being highlighted in Nevada. Both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton have commented and offered some solutions.

    The back story:

    […] Nevada is not leading […] Though the state’s solar industry was once thriving, a December decision by the Nevada Public Utility Commission (PUC) changed everything. With the stroke of a pen, the three-person, Republican-appointed commission hiked up fees for rooftop solar customers and slashed rebates, making it significantly more expensive for people to buy, install, and maintain panels on their homes and businesses.

    The state’s solar industry plummeted almost immediately. In the first week of January, SolarCity announced it would leave Nevada and fire 550 workers. Shortly thereafter, Vivint Solar also said it would leave the state, followed by residential solar company Sunrun. All cited the PUC’s decision for why they were packing up and taking their jobs with them.

    Now, both Sanders and his opponent Hillary Clinton are campaigning on the issue as they compete for votes in Nevada’s upcoming Democratic presidential caucus. […]

    A summary of the Sanders approach:

    […] Remind voters that a fossil-fuel funded billionaire caused the problem, and empower them to take action themselves.

    How did a billionaire cause the problem? In a nutshell, the new solar fees were requested by NV Energy, the state’s energy utility, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett. NV Energy argued that solar customers needed to be on equal footing with other sources like fossil fuels, and should not be getting comparatively low fees and high incentives from the state. In addition, the state’s increase in rooftop solar customers was harmful to NV’s business, as solar customers only had to buy electricity from the utility at night. […]

    On Saturday, in front of the laid-off workers, Sanders talked about “the future of the planet,” while advocating that the workers take the situation into their own hands. The workers, he said, should take on Buffett — in the form of a petition.

    “You might want to be thinking about writing a letter with a few hundred thousand signatures on it to Mr. Buffett and say, ‘You know what? What you’re doing here in Nevada is exactly wrong,’” he said.

    A summary of the Clinton approach:

    […] Instead of appealing to voters individually, she is broadly advocating for the passage of federal law.

    Specifically, she cited an amendment to The Energy Policy Modernization Act (EPMA), which would limit the ability of state agencies and utilities — like the PUC and NV Energy — to retroactively change rates and fees for existing customers. The amendment was proposed by Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) in response to Nevada’s struggles. […]

    While Clinton’s solution may be more tangible, Sanders’ may have an advantage in that he actually met with the laid-off workers. […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/16/3749765/bernie-sanders-nevada-solar-workers/

  221. says

    More spittle-flecked blather from the rightwing about nominating a replacement for Justice Scalia:

    “It is a terrible day when a nation loses a man like this, and God save us from what Obama must do,” Levin said. “And we must insist that the Republican Senate must stand up and give him no quarter, they must stand up and block anyone or anything Obama tries to do.”

    “I don’t think we should ram through an Obama appointee in a Republican Senate, for God’s sakes,” he said. “I mean, I’m sitting here thinking about it, you’re going to hear people say, ‘Well, this is unprecedented if we do this, and the Republicans…’ These aren’t people who really care about the nation the way I do or you do or our audiences do. No, they like the direction of the country, they just don’t think we’re going fast enough or hard enough radical left.” […]

    That’s conservative talk radio host Mark Levin speaking. Levin also warned Senate Republicans to act and vote the right way, threatening them with reelection opposition if they stepped out of line.

    […] [He warned] Senate Republicans who might consider voting on an Obama nominee, calling them a “Fifth Column” and warning that the Supreme Court fight is “a litmus test for the survival of the Republican Party.” […]

    Link.

  222. says

    More rightwing whackitude about Justice Scalia’s death:

    Glenn Beck asserted that God allowed Scalia to die in order to wake America up (“on the verge of losing its liberty,” and “hanging by a thread” … that last phrase is a mormon thing) so that America will see Ted Cruz as its savior and vote the right way. So, according to Beck, God killed Scalia.

    According to Alex Jones, the same thing he said yesterday bears repeating today: President Obama killed Scalia.

    […] he [Jones] had a “sixth sense” that “something big” was about to happen hours before the media reported on Scalia’s death. He added that he had “sweat running down me” because he knew following Scalia’s death that “all hell is about to break loose.”

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and other conservative leaders, he warned, may also soon wind up dead: “Maybe they’ll find the governor with a pillow over his face, maybe that’s the new thing. All of these conservatives that are fighting back that are real conservatives, they are all being found with pillows over their faces.”

    “Man, the psy-op is deep on this one,” Jones said, comparing Scalia’s death to his belief that 9/11 was an inside job.

    While Jones lamented that “Scalia walked into the perfect bear trap,” the InfoWars news crew also claimed that Obama wanted to “take out” Scalia in order to push through gun control and introduce socialism to the country.

    “This is it. This is the final assault,” Jones said. “This is the beginning of the final war.”

    Link.

  223. says

    Rachel Maddow analyzed the current state of election year politics and then she focused on Republican obstructionism when it comes to replacing Justice Scalia. She notes that the Republicans are threatening to damage the structure of the system of government in the USA.

    The video begins with a look a current polling, and at the formidable lead that Trump has in South Carolina. 17:13 minutes of excellent analysis.

  224. says

    CatieCat @251: Yes, that was a painful experience. I think I am still damaged from reading and summarizing that drivel.

    Alex Jones is really popular with extreme right-wingers. Donald Trump appeared on his show, and Trump praised his “amazing reputation.”

    We can often trace batshit crazy stuff that politicians quote right back to Alex Jones or to InfoWars in general. Forbes claimed that Alex Jones had moved from the fringes to the center of Republican politics. No, Republican politics moved so far to the right that they fell right into the Jones swamp.

    Jones holds forth for fours hours every day on more than 60 AM and FM radio stations. As of 2013, his audience was estimated at 2 million listeners. (I didn’t take the time to find more current figures.) He runs a website that gets a monthly audience of about 5 million unique visitors. There are 350,000 subscribers to his YouTube channel. He earns about $2 million per year.

    Bob Cesca of Salon wrote about how Jones has turned conspiracy theories into a religion.

  225. tomh says

    “Bob Cesca of Salon wrote about how Jones has turned conspiracy theories into a religion.”

    Sounds more like a money machine.

  226. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Ted Cruz and the Rethugs being an assholes: Change the name of the street where the Chinese Embassy is:

    The Obama administration said Tuesday that the president would veto legislation to rename the area in front of the Chinese Embassy in Washington after a prominent Chinese political prisoner.
    State Department spokesman Mark Toner told reporters that the bill proposed by Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, which has passed the Senate, would only complicate efforts to impress upon China the need to respect human rights and release Liu Xiaobo.

    What loony tunes ideologues.

  227. says

    Nerd @255, That’s also a big waste of time. Senators already have more vacation days than work days on their calendar. They already claim they don’t have time to do some of the business they are supposed to do, like confirm lower-court appointees from Obama. So what do they do? They waste time trying to insult the people in the Chinese Embassy.

    tomh @254, I agree. Alex Jones is running a scam.

  228. says

    John McCain has changed his mind when it comes to confirming a replacement for Justice Scalia. What McCain used to think: he “voted for both Justice Breyer and Justice Ginsburg, because I believed that President Clinton won the election,” and “elections have consequences. The American voter was very well aware of what kind of judge the president of the United States was going to appoint and they decided to re-elect him. Maybe that wasn’t the reason, but they knew that came with the deal.”

    Now McCain is lining up with his fellow obstructionist Republican Senators. His office issued a written statement blaming the “nuclear option” for destroying “any semblance of cooperation.” Bullshit.

    Here’s some of the back story on the so-called “nuclear option” for getting bills passed and appointees confirmed in the Senate:

    […] the Senate Republican minority imposed a blockade in 2013 on any President Obama nominee for the D.C. Circuit, regardless of merit, filibustering literally every jurist considered for the appellate bench. Republicans said at the time that the partisan blockade would continue indefinitely, even on judges who enjoyed majority support in the Senate.

    Left with no choice, Democrats restored majority rule using a legislative maneuver that Republicans came up with during the Bush/Cheney era. […]

    Link.

    The result was that a simple majority vote (51 votes) could carry the day. This is also sometimes called “regular order.” Without it, a super majority of 60 votes would be required to even get past a filibuster and bring a bill or confirmation vote to the floor. The return to regular order did not include confirmation votes for Supreme Court Justices. So that’s why we are in a difficult position when it comes to replacing Scalia.

  229. microraptor says

    Some days I just want to spray sriracha sauce directly into the sinuses of obstructive lawmakers.

  230. nahuati says

    This is how being left or right-handed influences your politics

    “It seems so obvious when you hear it, yet it could have shaped society for centuries without our knowing. According to research presented by Dr Daniel Casasanto to the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual conference in Washington DC, people just prefer things that are in front of their favourite hand. It could be products on a shelf, or applicants for a job.”

    “Righties would on average choose the person or product on the right; lefties, on average, the person or product on the left,” Dr Casasanto explained. And, from his research conducted at the University of Chicago, it is easy to see how this could have serious political implications. “We found in a large simulated election, that compared to lefties, righties will choose the candidate they see on the right of the ballot paper about 15% more,” Dr Casasanto said. His theory, in simple terms, is that because people go through life with a “fluent side” and a “clumsy side”, they develop a kind of unconscious favouritism, even for things that don’t require them to use their hands.

  231. says

    This might be good news. In recent years, several large corporations have withdrawn their support of the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). I tend to think these withdrawals are more a response to increasing scrutiny of ALEC than a sudden turn toward responsible and logical policy agendas.

    ALEC used to be able to hide the ways in which the organization fostered questionable relationships between corporations and legislators. Those relationships were used to affect so-called “model legislation” that was distributed to state and federal legislators.

    Still, any withdrawal of support is good. Today we find that Ford Motor Company is joining other corporations in a mass defection from ALEC. I think that some of the more intelligent CEOs are finding ALEC’s climate change denial and other goofy ideological stances too much to stomach. Google said earlier that ALEC was “literally lying about climate change.”

    http://www.prwatch.org/news/2016/02/13043/ford-becomes-latest-major-corporation-dump-alec

  232. says

    Republicans harbor as much irrational hatred of Hillary Clinton as they do for President Obama.

    Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) responded to a man who shouted “waterboard Hillary!” at a presidential campaign event Tuesday by appearing to jokingly suggest that he didn’t hear what was said and laughing off the remark. […]

    Many in the crowd quickly reacted to his comment with a laugh. Rubio appeared to laugh it off as well.

    “I don’t want to know what he said,” responded Rubio, adding: “The press is here, I didn’t even hear what they — I didn’t hear what they said. I know it wasn’t a bad word, that’s all that matters.”

    The quoted text comes from a Washington Post article.

    Here are a few of the ways in which rightwing hatred of Hillary Clinton showed up in the past:
    – they claimed she had murdered people, or ordered them murdered
    – she was trafficking cocaine
    – she was too outspoken to be a First Lady
    – she was selling arms to terrorists
    – etc.

  233. blf says

    There’s an interesting article in the Grauniad on two historical attempts to delay the process for replacing a dead Supreme Court justice, Republicans beware: blocking supreme court nominations can backfire:

    History shows that it’s impossible to call in advance whether forcing a delay will work in the service of one’s ideological agenda, or against it

    Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio — and all the other Republican obstructionists who want to block Obama from nominating a new US supreme court justice — would be wise to learn their 19th century history before they’re doomed to repeat it.

    […]

    [… E]fforts to avoid confirming a judge with opposing views may well backfire — it’s impossible to call in advance whether forcing a delay will work in the service of one’s ideological agenda, or against it.

    It happened both ways in the 19th century, when two supreme court justices died in election years — associate justice Henry Baldwin, who died in April 1844, and chief justice Roger B Taney, who passed away just a month before election day in 1864.

    It might seem unfair to draw parallels between Scalia and Taney, who was almost certainly the worst chief justice in US history; however […] there’s no denying [Scalia] was responsible for the high court’s conservative shift in recent years, from the Citizens United case, which unleashed the floodgates of corporate money into politics, to the overturning of the Voting Rights Act, to his constant opposition to reproductive rights and marriage equality.

    Taney, who served on the court from 1836 to his death, was a staunch conservative and a proponent of slavery. Most famously, he handed down the infamous Dred Scott decision in 1857 that ruled that African Americans could not be citizens. In Taney’s words, blacks were altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far unfit that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.

    Yes, Citizens United pales in comparison to this, but keep in mind that Scalia was the person who once compared homosexuality to reprehensible conduct, such as murder, for example, or polygamy, or cruelty to animals. In his dissent in Lawrence v Texas, which struck down Texas’s sodomy laws, he opined that homosexuality was akin to prostitution, adult incest, adultery, obscenity, and child pornography.

    […]

    Despite the fact that the Senate was firmly controlled by liberal Republicans (a party which shares little but a name with its current incarnation), Lincoln held off naming a successor to Taney until after his reelection, not wanting to provide any ammunition over his choice to his rival, Democrat George B McClellan.

    Lincoln won reelection handily. A month later, Salmon Chase, the former Treasury secretary, was nominated and confirmed to the bench in a single day. His support for Lincoln’s agenda helped the passage of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments — all of which would have been adamantly opposed by racist Roger Taney. […]

    […]

    When [justice Smith] Thompson died in December 1843, [president John] Tyler [had two nominations turned rejected]. By that point, Tyler’s rival, Whig Senator Henry Clay, was running for president and certainly wanted to wait until he was in office to make his own nomination and shape the court.

    Then, in April 1844, associate justice Henry Baldwin also passed away, leaving two vacancies on the bench. Clay’s Senate doubled down, refusing to support any Tyler nominee. When Clay lost the 1844 presidential election, a replacement for Thompson — Democrat Samuel Nelson — was finally confirmed in February 1845, Tyler’s last month in office.

    Henry Clay’s plan had backfired: he had hoped to hand pick two Whigs for the bench; instead the supreme court was now firmly in the hands of Roger Taney’s Democrats, whose rulings would fundamentally alter America’s history and ultimately lead to the civil war.

  234. says

    Here are few quotes from Ted Cruz … just in case we need a reminder of his level of assholery:

    “‘Net neutrality’ is Obamacare for the Internet.”
    ———-
    “Obama is just a ‘social worker’ who wants to put ISIS “on expanded Medicaid.”
    —————
    “It is the job of a chaplain to be insensitive to atheists.”
    ————
    “I didn’t threaten to shut down the government.” [Yes you did.]
    ————–
    “I intend to speak in opposition to Obamacare; I intend to speak in support of defunding Obamacare until I am no longer able to stand.”
    —————
    “It’s every bit as true now as it was then. We need 100 more like Jesse Helms in the U.S. Senate.”
    ————–
    “I don’t know that they’ve yet violated the Third Amendment, but I expect them to start quartering soldiers in people’s homes soon.”
    ————
    “The last 15 years, there has been no recorded warming. Contrary to all the theories that they are expounding, there should have been warming over the last 15 years. It hasn’t happened.”
    ————–
    “The Obama economy is a disaster, Obamacare is a trainwreck, and the Obama-Clinton foreign policy of leading from behind – the whole world is on fire.”

  235. blf says

    they claimed she [Senator Clinton] had murdered people, or ordered them murdered

    The extrajudicial execution-by-drone under Cheney / Bush ][ and Obama comes to mind…

    she was selling arms to terrorists

    Oliver North, is that you?

    etc.

    She speaks / reads Latin? Clearly unfit for office…

  236. says

    It’s silly to have to do this, but it looks like we need to debunk the conspiracy theory that Justice Scalia was suffocated with a pillow. Donald Trump repeated the “pillow over his face” lie.

    […] The owner of the resort who found Scalia, John Poindexter, later clarified to CNN, “He had a pillow over his head, not over his face as some have been saying…The pillow was against the headboard and over his head when he was discovered.” Presumably, few professional killers suffocate their targets and then forget to remove the pillow afterward. […]

    Mother Jones link.

    “Above his head” might have been better than the “over his head.”

    Conspiracy theories have now expanded: not only did President Obama kill Scalia, so did Hillary Clinton. Glenn Beck blamed God. Clinton killed Scalia so that, after she wins the presidency, she can appoint Barack Obama to the Supreme Court. Since other conspiracy theories have Obama running the UN, he is going to be a busy guy.

  237. says

    Oh good, more conspiracy theories. What would we do for entertainment if the whackos on the right didn’t keep coming up with this drivel?

    Scott Lively thinks that President Obama arranged the coup in Ukraine to prevent Lively’s much-beloved anti-gay laws from taking hold there, like they had done in Russia.

    Earlier this year, extremist anti-gay activist Scott Lively penned a “letter to the international pro-family movement,” in which called on activists to work to pass Russian-style laws banning gay “propaganda” in nations all around the world. […]

    Lively said, “but really the model for being able to fix this is Russia … St. Petersburg became the first city that adopted the Russian anti-propaganda law that criminalizes homosexual propaganda to children. This is absolutely essential to be done and several other Russian cities adopted it, then they took it nationally and it was passed unanimously by the Russian Duma and Putin signed it. That’s the law of the land in Russia.”

    “Immediately, five other countries, including Ukraine, were going to follow suit and enact that into law,” he continued, “and it looked like there was going to be a steamroller, that we were finally going to have a counter-revolution in the world to push this back, because this agenda is global.

    “Obama […] then orchestrated the coup in Ukraine and then sort of kick-started the Cold War again. I believe, personally, a lot of people might not, but I believe that one of the main reasons for him doing that was to stop the Russians from setting the example across the world because this agenda is heart and soul to Obama.”

    Right Wing Watch link.

  238. says

    More details are being added to the conspiracy theory that claims President Obama killed Scalia. He did it as a human sacrifice to Satan.

    “I find it interesting that Justice Scalia died on the 44th day of the year and Obama is the 44th president of the United States and here, once again, we have an unusual news event in which numerology appears,” [Rick] Wiles said. “Are these people that are running this country sick, Luciferian, devil-worshiping, Satanists?” […]

    Link.

    In the same radio interview, the host proffered the pseudo-fact that Donald Trump sent a private letter to Vladimir Putin to warn Putin that “this administration is resorting to murder.”

  239. says

    Obama has a soft spot for homosexuals because of the years he spent as a male prostitute in his twenties.

    That’s Republican candidate Mary Lou Bruner speaking. She is running for a spot on the 15-member Texas Board of Education.

    More words of wisdom (/sarcasm) from Mary Lou:

    Evolution is a religious philosophy with propaganda supporting the religion of Atheism.
    ————-
    When the flood waters subsided and rushed into the oceans there was no vegetation on the earth because the earth had been covered with water. . . . The dinosaurs on [Noah’s ark] may have been babies and not able to reproduce. . . . After the flood, the few remaining Behemoths and Leviathans may have become extinct because there was not enough vegetation on earth for them to survive to reproductive age.
    ————
    Climate change has nothing to do with weather or climate, it’s all about system change from capitalism (free enterprise) to Socialism-Communism. The Climate Change HOAX was Karl Marx’s idea. It took time to “condition” the people so they would believe such a HOAX!

    Mary Lou is not alone. The Salon article goes on to provide details about several other Texas politicians.

    As an aside, Alex Jone’s “Infowars” promoted the Obama-is-a-homosexual theory for awhile.

  240. Ice Swimmer says

    I was wondering whether the John Poindexter of Iran-Contra infamy and the ranch-owner/businessman John Poindexter are the same person, but some quick googling sugggests that they aren’t.

  241. says

    Oh, FFS. This is bad news. Misogyny raises its ugly head again. But don’t blame Bernie Sanders for this. Blame some of his supporters. (I am hoping Bernie has enough influence with Killer Mike to put a stop to this.)

    You don’t have to like Hillary Clinton, but it’s simply and demonstrably untrue that she has never accomplished anything in her life but growing a uterus. This should seem obvious, and yet these body part-obsessed accusations of female unworthiness have become a standard issue Bernie Bro jab on social media. And now the has-a-vagina-but-nothing-else-to-offer claim has been elevated to the actual Bernie Sanders campaign, courtesy of rapper Killer Mike.

    At a campaign event for Sanders, Killer Mike made a lengthy speech where he casually argued that “a uterus doesn’t qualify you to be president of the United States.” It’s something that female Clinton supporters get to hear every day, especially if they dare poke their heads out on Twitter or Facebook, and it continues to be a confirmation of nothing but the sexism of the person spouting this stupid line.

    It’s really a double-edged sword of sexist cruelty, both reducing Clinton to her gender and insulting the intelligence of the woman on the receiving end of this slur by assuming that she, being some dumb broad, just mechanically sees another lady and goes, “Me vote lady!” […]

    Killer Mike took to social media and rolled out the standard excuses […]: A woman said the same stupid sexist thing, so it’s OK! […] It’s the Clinton supporters who are sexist, because they are only voting for her because of her gender! Which is, of course, the untrue and sexist accusation that he’s trying to backpedal from […]

    Salon link.

  242. blf says

    More people who do not understand the concept of free speech, Parents complain at Illinois high school choir singing Glory from the film Selma:

    The Oscar and Grammy-winning song by Common and John Legend has aroused the ire of parents who claim it is one-sided against US police

    Parents in Illinois are outraged after students in Chatham-Glenwood high school’s choir decided to perform the theme song from the film Selma at its upcoming concert.

    The song, Glory, was featured in the 2014 Martin Luther King Jr biopic and has won an Oscar, a Grammy and a Golden Globe for its performers John Legend and Common, who co-wrote the song with Che “Rhymefest” Smith.

    The song choice has upset several parents and community members, high school principal Jim Lee told the Guardian. Lee said he has received about 15 phone calls and emails from adults complaining that the song is offensive and disrespectful to law enforcement.

    The complaints center on one lyric: “That’s why we walk through Ferguson with our hands up.” […]

    However, Lee said that particular lyric won’t be included in the choir’s version of the song. The sheet music Chatham-Glenwood high school received for the song omits the line about Ferguson.

    The article does not explain why the line was omitted. It’s apparent omission makes the complaints amusing, in addition to pathetic.

    […]
    Four law enforcement officers met at the school on Wednesday to share their concerns about the song. Lee told the Guardian the discussion went well, but did not end in a conclusive manner. […]

    And police intimidation !

  243. says

    blf @273, What are the students learning from that disagreement?

    Another learning experience for high school students took place in Beaufort SC today. About a dozen kids politely protested at a Trump rally. They were outside the venue, causing no trouble until a bunch of Trumps supporters started harassing them. Link. Scroll down to watch the video.

    In other news, in 2012 eighteen percent of Latinos viewed the GOP as “hostile” to them. Now, thanks to Donald Trump, 45% of Latinos view the GOP as hostile. Way to go Trumpster. You did accomplish something.

  244. says

    Bundy militia update: A federal grand jury has handed down sixteen felony charges against Cliven Bundy and other militiamen involved in the Nevada standoff in April 2014. Cliven Bundy, Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Pete Santilli and Ryan Payne, have been indicted.

    We waited a long time for this.

    “The rule of law has been reaffirmed with these charges,” said U.S. Attorney Bogden. “Persons who use force and violence against federal law enforcement officers who are enforcing court orders, and nearly causing catastrophic loss of life or injury to others, will be brought to justice.” […]

    […] charged with one count of conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, one count of conspiracy to impede or injure a federal officer, four counts of using and carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, two counts of assault on a federal officer, two counts of threatening a federal law enforcement officer, three counts of obstruction of the due administration of justice, two counts of interference with interstate commerce by extortion, and one count of interstate travel in aid of extortion.

    The indictment also alleges five counts of criminal forfeiture which upon conviction would require forfeiture of property derived from the proceeds of the crimes totaling at least $3 million, as well as the firearms and ammunition possessed and used on April 12, 2014. […]

    United States Attorney’s Office, District of Nevada link.

    Penalties for each charge range from 5 to 20 years in prison; and the fine is $250,000 for each charge.

  245. says

    Republican senators are getting more pressure from rightwing organizations to toe the line when it comes to obstructing an Obama nominee to replace Scalia.

    […] “The strategy that makes the most sense is to say that there should not be any consideration of this nominee,” Curt Levey, executive director of the FreedomWorks Foundation, said in an interview with TPM. “It would be irrelevant to have a hearing because it’s the situation: the fact that it’s an election year, the fact that his policies are before the court, the fact that the court is so finely balanced at the moment.” […]

    “It’s not about any one particular nominee,” Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the conservative legal organization Judicial Crisis Network, told TPM. “We know exactly the kind of person [Obama] is going to appoint. Getting into those details is just a silly distraction.” […]

    “Senator McConnell is right, under no circumstance should the Republican Senate majority confirm a Supreme Court nominee as Americans are in the midst of picking the next president,” Michael Needham — the head of Heritage Action, the lobby arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation — said in a statement posted Monday. […]

    “The Senate is under no obligation to consider them,” Travis Weber, the director of the FRC’s [Family Research Council] Center for Religious Liberty, said in an interview with TPM. “President Obama can nominate people until his heart’s content and they have no obligation to look at them one way or another, given the gravity of the moment.” […]

    FreedomWorks is preparing to target senators who look like they’ll back down from the fight, while bolstering those who hold to McConnell’s tough initial line. […] “In some cases where there are potential primary opponents, we might consider supporting a primary opponent if the senator did not do the right thing.” […]

    “The very fact that people on our side feel very strongly that there shouldn’t be a hearing before we know the nominee is because it’s not really about the nominee. … Frankly, the real objection here is to Obama.”

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/outside-groups-scotus-nom-fight

  246. says

    A teenager who was roughed up at a Trump rally tells his story:

    […] “I have so many friends who are immigrants here, and I’m Puerto Rican,” the 18-year-old [said]. “Trump’s policies about immigrants are really scary. I have always said that if you have a problem with something you should exercise your right to protest, so I thought I needed to practice what I preach, and let [Trump] know that people do oppose him.”

    Armed with only a homemade sign reading, “Keep America Great, Keep All Immigrants,” Hill joined hundreds of others at Trump’s rally in North Augusta, South Carolina on Tuesday. As he waited in line for nearly an hour, a campaign volunteer informed the crowd that should they see or hear protesters, they should not touch them, but instead should drown them out by chanting Trump’s name. This has become a standard message at Trump rallies, following several instances of supporters violently attacking demonstrators.

    Yet Hill says the warning did not deter the two men who grabbed him during the rally after he silently raised his sign.

    “I held my poster up for about five minutes before someone came behind me and ripped it out of my hands,” Hill told ThinkProgress. “When I attempted to put what was left of the poster up in the air, he pulled my arm, then grabbed my hoodie and started to choke me with it. I pulled him in towards me just to prevent him from choking me.”

    […] Hill said no one intervened on his behalf during the scuffle, until a second man grabbed his sweatshirt.

    “He kept screaming at me that he was an off-duty cop and I had to do what he said,” he recounted. “I didn’t see a badge and kept asking him for one. I put my hands up and asked him to let me go, but he refused. Finally, security arrived and walked me out of the room.”

    As Hill exited, Trump invited the two men who grabbed and choked him on stage, praising their “courage” and giving them a chance to address the crowd.

    Hill said he wasn’t planning on giving the middle finger to crowd, but hearing his attackers complimented made him “a little upset.”

    “The fact that they were honored really got to me,” he said. “I was upset that violence like that was being condoned. I was expecting to be attacked, but I wasn’t expecting Trump himself to kind of say thank you to these guys.” […]

    Trump has linked immigrants to terrorism, crime, sexual violence, job loss, and heroin trafficking, and Hill says he has started to hear people in his community repeat these talking points.

    “[…] It’s been kinda scary, to be honest, seeing so many people I know who aren’t even racist or that conservative slowly start to listen to him. Since he’s become more popular, I’ve heard more and more people talk about how illegals are stealing jobs and need to be dealt with.” […]

    Link

  247. says

    Wisconsin is one of those states with new voter ID laws. Things are not going well. Both students and veterans were turned away at the polls during an local election.

    […] The election decided several mayoral contests and helped conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley clear a key hurdle to maintaining her seat on the state’s powerful Supreme Court.

    The law will be in place again for the presidential primary on April 5, which is likely to see greater voter turnout. But even in Tuesday’s local election, issues with ID arose.

    […] some students and veterans were unable to cast regular ballots, because the state doesn’t recognize a federal veterans’ benefits card or a state university ID for voting purposes. […]

    Governor Scott Walker ignored the problems and said everything was fine:

    Voter turnout was high on Tuesday and the photo ID law worked fine. In Wisconsin, it should be easy to vote but hard to cheat.

    Local media reported that turnout was low, even down to single digits in some counties. And lots of people who are not Scott Walker complained about the ID requirements.

    […] Dane County Executive Joe Parisi, whose county includes the University of Wisconsin’s tens of thousands of students, strongly disagreed with Governor Walker that all is well with the new ID law.

    “We did hear of one veteran who was turned away because all he had was his military ID. […] Student participation was also very low, and among those who turned out, some didn’t have the proper ID. About 15 or 16 young people had to cast provisional ballots in Dane County.” Such ballots are often never counted.

    Students also reported problems in Eau Claire. University of Wisconsin freshman Nathan Gilger, who was initially turned away for having an out-of-state drivers license, told local reporters, “I definitely see the new I.D. requirement as a deterrent. It feels more like a chore to vote.” […]

    Link

  248. blf says

    It must loonie’s heads ‘xploding season, White House announces that Obama will visit Cuba in March:

    Obama will be the first American president to visit Cuba since Calvin Coolidge in 1928, on a trip next month that will attempt to end decades of cold war hostility
    […]
    [… Obama] will be the first American president to visit Cuba since Calvin Coolidge in 1928. “President Coolidge travelled to Cuba on a US battleship, so this will be a very different kind of visit,” said Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser.

    Rhodes added that the US still has “serious differences” with Cuban president Raúl Castro’s government. He said Obama will raise issues of human rights and political freedoms in discussions with Castro.

    […]

    The move has already been condemned by Republican candidates for president. Ted Cruz, whose father came from Cuba in 1957, said: I think it’s a real mistake. I think the president instead ought to be pushing for a free Cuba.

    Hey you, yeah, you, teh crud: It’s call diplomacy. Which does not mean carpet-bombing or staying home with your hands over yer ears, your head up yer arse, and shouting LA LA LA, I CAN’T HEAR YOU, AND YOU’RE ALWAYS DOING IT WRONG ANYWAYS, LA LA LA….

    By going to Cuba now, Obama will essentially act as an apologist, Cruz added.

    Fellow candidate Marco Rubio, also of Cuban descent, said he would not visit as president. Not if it’s not a free Cuba,” he insisted. “The Cuban government remains as oppressive as ever.

    Obama [said] last December: “I am very much interested in going to Cuba, but I think the conditions have to be right. And what I’ve said to the Cuban government is: ‘If, in fact, I with confidence can say that we’re seeing some progress in the liberty and freedom and possibilities of ordinary Cubans, I’d love to use a visit as a way of highlighting that progress.’”

    And a few readers’s comments:

    ● Obama is a low life scum sucking human being. He will go to Cuba and spend time with his socialist/communist buddies, but he doesn’t have a Saturday afternoon to pay respects to a Supreme Court judge who served this great country for over three decades. What a BUM!
    In reply: “You failed to include Muslim in your rantings.”

    ● “It is my contention that the American embargo has done more harm to the Cuban people that any harm the actions of their government has done to them!”

    I think I shall have to buy a big bag of nuts — the edible kind — to munch on watching the nutters — the rarely-edible kind — going bugfecking nuttier.

  249. blf says

    The SPLC is to go-to group for information about hate groups and exceptionally nasty people. Even the FBI uses them as a reference. They are not impressed with wazzock trum-prat, Southern Poverty Law Center affixes Trump as face of ‘year in hate’ report:

    The annual report focuses on how hate speech, mostly from Donald Trump, has pervaded mainstream politics, as well as the 14% increase in US hate groups

    The Southern Poverty Law Center anchored its annual report on hate in America with a picture of […] Donald Trump.

    The image underscores a theme […], about how hate speech has invaded mainstream political discourse in a way that might have shocked many even a year ago.

    “I have been writing these Year in Hate and Extremism essays for 20 years now, and only very rarely, if at all, have we seen a year like last year,” said Mark Potok, a senior fellow at SPLC and author of the Intelligence Report.

    There is “enormous rage in the electorate, the growth of hate groups and also hate speech in mainstream politics to an extent that we have not seen in decades”, he said.

    Year on year, the SPLC found a 14% increase in the sheer number of hate groups, which rose from 784 in 2014 to 892 in 2015. Hate groups are generally classified as any group whose speech “maligns or demeans” an entire group of people, usually based on immutable characteristics.

    […]

    Counted among the hate speech in the report were Trump’s statements on how illegal immigrants, especially Mexicans, are more likely to be rapists; his proposal to ban Muslim immigration to the US; and his tweets that regurgitate racist propaganda or retweeting of white supremacists. All of these statements, the SPLC said, caused the candidate to receive, “glowing endorsements from white nationalist leaders”.

    “The biggest thing behind that rage I’m describing is the dramatic demographic change the US has gone through as a result of immigration and globalization,” said Potok. “The idea that this country will lose its white majority in 30 years.” The US Census Bureau predicts that no one racial or ethnic group will have a majority by 2043, making the country a “majority-minority”.

  250. says

    blf @279, President Obama actually made some diplomatic progress in/with Cuba. If there’s one thing the rightwing cannot stand, it is Obama racking up impressive achievements during his presidency. They are also frustrated because they cannot condemn him for killing civilians with drone strikes. Head asplode indeed.

    blf @280, speaking of hate speech, Ben Carson made another stupid remark about Muslims:

    […] When asked by Breitbart host Stephen Bannon if American Muslims could possibly embrace both Islamic and democratic values, Carson replied, “Only if they’re schizophrenic. I don’t see how they can do it otherwise, because you have two different philosophies.” […]

    Bannon then asked Carson how he felt about Bush’s pronunciation that Islam is a religion of peace, to which Carson replied, “Bear in mind there are a lot of people in this country who will say that same thing … because they bought into it.” Carson added that the Prophet Muhammad was “somebody who [lived] a life who is in no way comparable to Jesus Christ.” […]

    Saba Ahmed, president and founder of the Republican Muslim Coalition, said she feels Dr. Carson’s remarks were over the line and extremely offensive.

    “As a Muslim it is offensive to be accused of schizophrenia,” Ahmed said. “There are tens of thousands of Muslims in this country who love American values and their religion at the same time. I am one of them.” […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/16/3750119/ben-carson-schizophrenic/

  251. says

    Maine Gov. Paul LePage (Republican/Tea Party doofus) said something stupid … again:

    “Asylum seekers — I think the biggest problem in our state — and I’ll explain that to you,” the Tea Party governor said during a standing-room-only town hall meeting, […] “And what happens is you get hepatitis C, tuberculosis, AIDS, HIV, the ‘ziki fly,’ all these other foreign type of diseases that find a way to our land.”

    Link

    There is no “ziki fly.”

  252. says

    What do former interrogators think about Trump’s and Cruz’s plans to waterboard (and worse) prisoners?

    […] a nonpartisan group of former national security, law enforcement, and interrogation professionals who served in an array of government [wrote] in a letter released Wednesday, […] that “as a candidate to be the next President and Commander in Chief, you have a responsibility to ensure that the United States adheres to effective, lawful, and humane standards for interrogation. We urge you to publicly and unequivocally reject the use of torture and cruel treatment.” […]

    Link

  253. says

    Ben Carson said some more stupid stuff. (I’ll be glad when this guy drops out of the race. I’m tired of reading his goofy pronouncements.)

    Like Ted Cruz before him, Republican presidential hopeful Ben Carson made a stop at MorningStar Fellowship Church in South Carolina last week, where he was introduced by extremist pastor, self-proclaimed prophet and Oak Initiative president Rick Joyner. […]

    “When you think about in terms of an exceptional nation,” Carson said, “I mean, before this nation came on the scene, [for] 100 years, 500, 1,000, 5,000 years people did things the same way. You know, the farmer would chop down corn and put it on the wagon and take it into town and sell it; within 200 years of the advent of America, men were walking on the moon.”

    Right Wing Watch link.

  254. says

    I suppose everyone has heard by now that Apple is defying a court order to aid the FBI by breaking into a phone used by the criminals who committed the San Bernardino massacre.

    Ben Carson has a solution: elect him president and everyone will find him so trustworthy that they will be glad to defeat encryption or other privacy protection measures on their devices.

    […] When [Mike] Gallagher asked if he agreed with the Obama administration’s position that Apple should help break into the phone, Carson said yes, but that the company might be more willing to cooperate with a more “trustworthy” administration.

    “In general, I think it would be a good idea,” he said, “but I do understand why Apple might not be particularly fond of this government because they’ve been so dishonest in so many other areas. But if we get an administration that is trustworthy, I believe one of the first things that we’re going to push for are the right kinds of public-private partnerships.”

    Link.

  255. says

    Donald Trump picked two more fights: one with the Pope and one with Rupert Murdoch.

    The Pope commented that people who just want to build walls instead of building bridges are not christians. Trump took umbrage and claimed that Mexico had encouraged the Pope to show him some disrespect.

    As far as Rupert Murdoch goes:

    […] Trump criticized a Wall Street Journal poll showing him slightly trailing Ted Cruz among Republican voters nationwide as “a fix” and “a phony poll.”

    “It was a Rupert Murdoch hit,” he said, expressing disbelief that the Texas senator would poll ahead of him since “Cruz couldn’t get elected dog catcher.”

    Trump said that News Corp-run outlets like Fox News and the Wall Street Journal are biased against him because “they’re in love with [Marco] Rubio,” unlike CNN and the MSNBC program “Morning Joe.” […]

    Link

    Note to “Morning Joe” hosts, please stop showering love, hugs and softball questions on Donald Trump. Joe Scarborough is a disgrace.

  256. says

    This is a followup to comment 286.

    Other people also think Joe Scarborough of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” is behaving like a Trump fan-boy.

    Media outlets called out MSNBC’s Morning Joe hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski for their performance moderating a town hall with Donald Trump, stating the hosts “went easy on the frontrunner” and calling the event “disgraceful,” and a “big fat waste.” […]

    In a February 17 article, Slate criticized Brzezinski and Scarborough for “what appeared to be a rehearsed and ‘safe’ town hall,” calling the event “disgraceful.” The piece went on to condemn it as “a rigged entertainment program” with “mild” questions and “nonexistent” follow-ups, adding that the sole benefit of the town hall was that it “highlighted the many ways in which the media’s coverage of Trump has been soft, insufficient, and without substance.” […]

    Mother Jones called out Scarborough and Brzezinski for failing to press Trump on his controversial comments, calling it reminiscent of “the way we don’t challenge our drunk uncle at Thanksgiving.” Calling the event a “big fat waste” of time, the article pointed out that despite the fact Trump “has called for a ban on Muslim immigrants, has retweeted posts from white supremacists, and has remarked that Mexican immigrants are ‘rapists,'” he “wasn’t asked about any of these assertions” […]

    The Fiscal Times, called the town hall event “a freebie” for Trump. highlighting how “there wasn’t the slightest pushback” when Trump erred while responding to a question about Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders’ college affordability plan […]

    Media Matters link.

  257. says

    This is a followup to my comment about Trump picking a fight with the Pope. I just wanted to add one more detail.

    About the Pope’s comments, Trump said (without a hint of irony), “No leader, especially a religious leader, should have the right to question another man’s religion or faith.”

    Trump has questioned the legitimacy of Carson’s Seventh-day Adventist faith; about Ted Cruz he said, “to the best of my knowledge, not too many evangelicals come out of Cuba.” And Trump is the guy who wants to ban all Muslims.

  258. says

    The Latino Victory Fund endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.

    We are proudly endorsing Hillary Clinton for President. Hillary has been a champion for #Latinos. She is the best person for the job, and we know she will deliver solutions for our community and for all Americans. The stakes are simply too high in the 2016 election for Latinos to sit on the sidelines.

    In other news: Donald Trump continues his fight with the Pope by pointing out that the Vatican is surrounded by massive walls. Trump also said if the Islamic State were ever to attack the Vatican, the Pope “would have only wished and prayed that Donald Trump would have been President.”

    What Trump said about the Pope in December: “The new Pope is a humble man, very much like me, which probably explains why I like him so much!”

    What the Pope said about Trump:

    “A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian,” His Holiness told reporters on board his airliner. “This is not in the Gospel.”

    Because the Pope had not independently heard about Trump’s campaign promise to build a wall at the U.S. border with Mexico, he said he would “give him the benefit of the doubt.”

    “I’d just say that this man is not Christian if he said it this way,” the Pope added.

    Link.

  259. says

    Governor Scott Walker (Republican doofus of Wisconsin) restricted funding for Planned Parenthood today.

    Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker went to a crisis pregnancy center in Waukesha to sign two bills that will cut Planned Parenthood’s funding in the state.

    Crisis pregnancy centers are those places that falsely advertise help they do not offer. They are fronts for religiously-based shaming of women. They are nodes in the anti-abortion network. CPCs are definitely not an alternative to Planned Parenthood.

    “Certainly, over the past year there’s been a lot of controversy nationally about Planned Parenthood,” Walker said before signing the legislation. “For those of us who are pro-life, this is important…taxpayer dollars at the federal and state level should not be spent…particularly when there are noncontroversial alternatives.”

    The first measure concerns prescription drugs. It restricts the amount Planned Parenthood gets back in Medicaid reimbursements for birth control prescriptions […].

    This practice is estimated to cost Planned Parenthood $4.5 million annually. Other family planning clinics will still be able to acquire birth control at a discounted price through Medicaid’s 340B program. The bill singles out Planned Parenthood by referring to “a covered entity that is an abortion provider.” […]

    Assembly Bill 310, also signed by Walker today […] prevents the state from relaying federal money from the Title X grant program to any group that either provides abortions or is affiliated with an abortion provider. Title X money is used for family planning and health screening for the poor and the uninsured—it cannot be used for abortions, according to federal law. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin receives about $3.5 million from Title X each year, and 61 percent of Planned Parenthood patients in Wisconsin live below the poverty line, according to the group’s 2014 annual report. […]

    Mother Jones link.

    Walker’s actions will hurt all of the Planned Parenthood clinics in Wisconsin. There are 22 Planned Parenthood clinics in the state, and 3 of them provide abortion services. The clinics serve 60,000 patients in Wisconsin per year.

    And [weary sigh] Walker is hurting poor and low-income women the most.

  260. says

    The rightwing organization True the Vote is pushing the conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton is going to “steal” the election. They have some bonkers ideas, including that “ballot security efforts” are being undermined. I think they might be referring to rules that prevent True the Vote doofuses from harassing voters and polling place workers.
    Link.

  261. quotetheunquote says

    @ #286

    Made the mistake of listening to a bit of what the Donald had to say about the Pontiff on As it Happens last night (and I am paraphrasing here, but only a little) – ” When the ISIS hordes are at the gates of St. Peter’s Basilica – because this is, everybody knows, their number one goal – don’t come crying to me!”

    I can’t do it anymore, I can’t listen to the news about this man, I have only so many brain cells left….

  262. says

    No-show Robot Rubio is running into more trouble about his career-long habit of not showing up for work. The Washington Post looked into his work record in Florida and found some disturbing facts:

    In the anxious weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Florida House hurriedly assembled an elite group of lawmakers to develop plans to keep the state safe.

    A spot on the Select Committee on Security was a mark of prominence in Tallahassee. Some of the airplane hijackers had acquired Florida driver’s licenses and trained at flight schools in the state, and legislators lobbied furiously behind the scenes in hopes of being named to the 12-member panel tasked with addressing the state’s newly exposed vulnerabilities. […]

    Rubio really wanted a spot on the Select Committee on Security, but apparently he only wanted it so it would look good on his resumé, and not so that he could actually work on security issues in Florida. Rubio “skipped nearly half of the meetings over the first five months of the panel’s existence, more than any of his colleagues. He missed hours of expert testimony and was absent for more than 20 votes.”

    Right after 9/11, Rubio did not have running a presidential campaign as an excuse for missing briefings and votes. He was a state-level legislator. He didn’t show up for work. You would think that the right-wingers who throw a hissy fit every time President Obama plays a round of golf would not go for this Absentee in Chief routine.

  263. says

    What about Rubio’s current job in U.S. Senate? The Tampa Bay Times reported:

    Rubio is on the Foreign Relations, Intelligence, Commerce and Small Business and Entrepreneurship committees. The Florida Republican has missed 68 percent of hearings, or 407 of 598 for which records were available.

    His skipped 80 percent of Commerce hearings and 85 percent of those held by Small Business, records show.

    He has missed 60 percent of Foreign Relations hearings since joining the Senate despite making his committee experience a centerpiece of his qualifications for president. […]

  264. says

    quotetheunquote @292, I’m sorry Donald Trump made you suffer again. I saw a repeat of that “when ISIS comes to get the Vatican, you’ll wish I was there” (paraphrase) on two different news programs last night. That was followed by interviews with Trump supporters who all said they agreed, that their Trumpster had done and said the right thing, and that Trump understands the issue of the border with Mexico and the Pope does not. Their favorite trope was that “the Vatican has walls, so there!”

    I throw up my hands in despair.

    Here’s the latest polling, which contains the very slightly cheery news that Trump has slipped by all of 8 points. (He still has a lead.)
    1. Donald Trump: 28% (down from 36% in January)
    2. Ted Cruz: 23% (up from 20%)
    3. Marco Rubio: 15% (up from 14%)
    4. Jeb Bush: 13% (up from 9%)
    5. Ben Carson: 9% (up from 8%)
    5. John Kasich: 9% (up from 1%)

    That’s the NBC/Wall Street Journal/Marist poll. Other polls show Trump down by as few as 3 points.

  265. says

    For months, Donald Trump has been bragging that “I’m the one from 2002, 2003 who said we shouldn’t be” invading Iraq.

    That brag was always based on shaky ground since he really barely mentioned Iraq until July 2004, and before that he talked about Iraq in a way that you could parse his statements and come up with several meanings. In July of 2004, anyone could see that things were going badly.

    Now BuzzFeed has Trump in a vice made of facts:

    In the interview, which took place on Sept. 11, 2002, Stern asked Trump directly if he was for invading Iraq.

    “Yeah I guess so,” Trump responded. “I wish the first time it was done correctly.”

    BuzzFeed link.

    That’s not a full-throated endorsement of the war, but it is also not what Trump claimed, that he was definitely against the war from 2002 on.

    In a recent followup interview with Anderson Cooper, the story changed:

    When told about the report, Trump replied by saying, “I could have said that. Nobody asked me. I wasn’t a politician. It was probably the first time anybody asked me that question.”

    By the time the war began, he added, he opposed the war.

    RawStory link.

    The point is that Trump continually fudges the facts and he thinks that’s okay. He uses the fudged facts to make some of his major “vote for me” points during his campaign.

  266. says

    Utah Senator Orrin Hatch is in contact with dead Justice Scalia:

    […] [He] said on Wednesday that Justice Antonin Scalia would not be upset for the Supreme Court to proceed with a missing seat, saying the deceased justice “knows that the court can function with eight members.”

    Hatch has other specious arguments for not replacing Justice Scalia at this time:

    Scalia’s voice in his head isn’t the only argument Hatch has for obstruction. He also says that he’s only thinking of the potential nominee and the institutions of the court and the Senate, because going through a partisan and politicized (cough, cough) battle would be “demeaning.” Because, of course, Hatch is all about being above politics.

    Link.

  267. says

    The Nevada caucus vote looks very close on the Democratic side. Clinton and Sanders appear to be running neck and neck, though Nevada is a hard state to poll, no one is sure what’s going on there. Caucus day is tomorrow.

    South Carolina is a different story, with Clinton in the lead and, according to some polls, increasing her lead over Sanders. Representative James E. Clyburn, one of the top black leaders in Congress and a prominent Democrat in South Carolina, endorsed Hillary Clinton for president today.

  268. says

    In the lead-up to the primary vote in South Carolina, Bernie Sanders has received support from some prominent black leaders including Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) and former NAACP chairman Ben Jealous.

  269. says

    Oh, FFS. Ted Cruz is the Cliven Bundy of Republican presidential candidates. Cruz released a new TV ad in which he says he will sell of give away all of Nevada’s national park, national forest, national monument, and BLM (Bureau of Land Management) lands.

    “I will fight day and night to return full control of Nevada’s lands to its rightful owners, its citizens.”

    This ad comes on the heels of Cliven Bundy and his sons Ryan and Ammon having been indicted by a grand jury. I guess Cruz doesn’t care if the company he keeps includes indicted criminals.

    […] These lands include the Lake Mead National Recreation Area on the Colorado River, Great Basin National Park, the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, and Basin and Range National Monument.

    Cruz’s comments in the ad, which echo legislation he introduced in 2014, do not specify whether he would dispose of national public lands in Nevada by directly auctioning them off to mining, energy, timber and other private interests or by first transferring them to the control of the state government. If they were transferred to state control, the state government would likely have to sell off a large portion to raise the money needed to pay the costs of fighting wildfires and managing the remaining lands.[…]

    Think Progress link.

  270. says

    Mother Jones posted an article sharply critical of the domestic spending proposals from the Sanders campaign.

    In other news, a racist newsletter in South Carolina has endorsed Donald Trump:

    […] The Conservative Action Report appears to be affiliated with the South Carolina Conservative Action Council, which “proudly” defends the “Confederate South” and the Confederate flag. […]

    One front-page story in the newsletter is headlined “Is Barack Obama a Muslim?” Another is called “Blacks and the Confederacy—the story the leftist mass media will never tell.” An op-ed in the newsletter refers to Gov. Nikki Haley by her birth name, Nimrada Randhawa, and attacks her for her “Stalinesque” decision to remove the Confederate flag from the statehouse grounds after last year’s mass shooting in Charleston.

    The newsletter, which endorses Trump and hails his proposed wall along the Mexican border, also slams Cruz (on trade) and Marco Rubio (on immigration). […]

    Link

  271. says

    Ted Cruz has promised that if he is elected president he will not support gluten-free meals for military personnel. WTF?
    Link

    “That’s why the last thing any commander should need to worry about is the grades he is getting from some plush-bottomed Pentagon bureaucrat for political correctness or social experiments — or providing gluten-free MREs,” Cruz said.

  272. blf says

    Chicago used water department employees’ homes to test for lead (my boldfacing):

    Testing regime in US’s third most populous city raises significant concerns about conflict of interest in producing data to confirm tap water’s safety

    New evidence suggests that the way US water is tested for lead is vulnerable to conflicts of interest that raise questions about data confirming tap water’s safety. The new evidence could cast further doubt on already controversial testing methods highlighted following the ongoing water crisis in Flint, Michigan.

    A Guardian investigation has discovered that in the US’s third most populous city the testing regime for lead involves using its own employees’ homes.

    “This does raise significant concerns about a conflict of interest,” said Marc Edwards, the Virginia Tech scientist and MacArthur Genius Award winner who helped expose the ongoing crisis in Flint.

    The Guardian’s analysis of records from the city of Chicago’s water management department, which serves 5.4 million residents, reveals that of the 51 homes analyzed for lead contamination in the city in the last round of testing, at least two dozen were the agency’s own current employees. […]

    “It has also been a long-term mystery why the Chicago water department has never found problems with high lead in Chicago water,” said Edwards, “when outside entities including the US Environmental Protection Agency and Consumer Reports have repeatedly done so.”

    […] The water department later told the Guardian that the latest round of water sampling included 24 residences of employees, of the total 51 sites sampled.

    The city of Chicago is required by the US EPA to test what are deemed the “highest risk” homes based on a variety of factors such as whether the homes have lead services lines and the year the homes were built.

    The water department maintains that these are the highest risk homes in the city.

    But Edwards is skeptical. “It seems hard to believe, that these employee homes are the ‘worst case’ sampling sites that are supposed to be targeted,” he said.

    […]

    Testing employees’ water is so embedded in the city of Chicago’s protocols that the city has developed two separate sets of instructions for sampling water: one for city employees and one for the general public.

    […]

    A 2013 study of 32 homes in Chicago published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology found that the EPA’s own Lead and Copper Rule sampling protocol “systematically misses the high lead levels and potential human exposure”.

    The study’s lead author, Miguel Del Toral, is the same EPA water expert who attempted to blow the whistle on Flint’s tainted water months before the crisis became public.

    He wrote that when sequential water samples were taken from homes, they found “maximum {lead} values more than four times higher than Chicago’s regulatory compliance results using a first-draw sampling protocol”.

    The study warned that lead levels appeared highest at homes where lead lines were disturbed, through street-heavy excavation or even relatively minor meter replacement.

    After Del Toral’s report, however, the Chicago’s political establishment attempted to sideline the scientist.

    Chicago water is absolutely safe to drink and meets or exceeds all standards set by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Illinois EPA, wrote the water commissioner, Tom Powers. […]

    Already, the water department had quietly removed controversial instructions for how employees and residents were told to sample water, according to documents provided to the Guardian.

    Water sampling instructions from 2006 and 2009 asked people to remove faucet aerators, clean out any debris, flush for five minutes with cold water and replace the aerator.

    Such measures are regularly criticized by water experts […]

    […]

    The February 2015 notice from the city of Chicago seemed to recognize that cleaning aerators can affect the amount of lead in water. The notice, sent out as the city replaced water mains, told residents to clean aerators because, “metals can collect in the aerator screen located at the tip of your faucets”.

    At the present time, there aren’t very many readers’s comments, but there are several similar to this one, “I have lived in Chicago for over 20+ years, reading the Tribune, the Sun-Times, and all the local news sites. I thank the gods I have found the Guardian so I can know what the hell is happening in this town.”

  273. blf says

    Interesting analysis in the Grauniad, How the Bush dynasty’s tactics birthed the President Trump nightmare:

    Torture unleashed, race invoked and controversy on demand: novelist Adam Haslett finds familiar echoes in the unseemly business of self-promotion from Dubya to the Donald

    […]

    [… T]he Bushes have long been aristocrats with knives in their pockets. In politics since the 1950s and in the White House for 16 of the last 28 years, this dynastic family embodies more than any other the transformation of the Republican party from a coalition of north-eastern social liberals and economic elites to one of southern, religious conservatives and free-market extremists.

    Jeb’s grandfather, Prescott Bush, was a liberal Republican senator from Connecticut who took a stance against Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s. His son, former president George HW Bush, moved to Texas and to the right, opposing the Voting Rights Act and supporting Barry Goldwater in 1964. In order to run as Ronald Reagan’s vice-president, he subsequently abandoned his liberal support for abortion rights, and became a staunch opponent of them.

    HW’s son George, in turn, completed the pilgrimage of the party by running as an Evangelical with a Texas drawl committed to privatizing social security and slashing the taxes his father had been pilloried for agreeing to raise. And Jeb went to macabre lengths in proving his own devotion to the pro-life agenda as governor of Florida, personally intervening to prevent the husband of Terri Schiavo, a brain-dead woman, from taking his wife off life support.

    Along this path came the willingness to employ — always at arm’s length — not only the kind of racially charged demagoguery that Trump brandishes openly, but the staging of false controversy for political gain that is the real estate executive’s modus operandi.

    It is not just the Republican party’s general extremism that has created such a vast public space for a demagogue to fill. The Bush family’s political behavior, in all its disdainful violence, prepared the way for Trump. The difference being that where the Bushes used henchmen [Lee Atwater and Karl Rove], Trump is his own — and all the more effective for it.

    […]

    In an interview at the end of his life […], Atwater described the use of race in American politics thusly:

    You start out in 1954 by saying, ‘N—r, n—r, n—r.’ By 1968 you can’t say ‘n—r’ — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites.

    […]

    [… I]n order to win the presidency — after losing the popular vote — [Bush] required another intervention by the family retainers: a fake riot at the Miami-Dade election offices during the Florida recount, which set off a media frenzy about election chaos, ginning up national anxiety and creating the demand for the quickest possible resolution. […]

    [… discusses Bush’s use of torture whilst denying it was happening, and the connection to teh trum-prat’s call for moar torture …]

    Beyond specific tactics and policies, there remains another, in some ways more insidious connection between the stratagems of the second Bush presidency and the rise of a reality TV star to leading candidate for president.

    It can be seen in an interview that Karl Rove gave […] during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2002. In typically hands-off fashion, he was identified only as a “senior administration official”. As [the interviewer] later described it:

    The aide said that guys like me were ‘in what we call the reality-based community’, which he defined as people who ‘believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality’. I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. That’s not the way the world really works anymore, he continued. We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality […] we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors{…} and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.

    What Rove was describing is perhaps the most damaging long-term effect of the most recent Bush administration on American democracy: the deliberate and manipulative delinking of the action of the sovereign from the shared sense of a “discernible reality”.

    […]

    To make all this detachment from reality possible, both the Bushes and Trump require just two ingredients: anxiety and fear, which all the 2016 Republican candidates, including Jeb, have encouraged voters to feel at every turn. At a Marco Rubio rally the other day inside a high school gym in Easley, the young senator went so far as to simply instruct the nearly all-white audience on the matter. You are afraid, he told them. You are scared.

    […]

    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “[… T]o paraphrase a joke heard recently: ‘If Trump is going to become captain of your ship, I think you would do better off sitting in the lifeboat’.”

    ● “The story goes a bit deeper. Lee Atwater came to national political attention when he was the mastermind of Ronald Reagan’s campaign strategy in South Carolina and later in the South as a whole. Before that he worked from Strom Thurmond and a number of other southern candidates. In 1982, Reagan appointed Atwater to the position of Deputy Assistant to the President for Political Affairs. Lee was also Chairman of the Republican National Committee. Bush the First followed Reagan’s lead and the story continues to this day. Today’s Republicans are reaping what their idol Reagan sewed — a bitter legacy indeed.”

    ● “Here is a quote from Bush senior: I will never apologize for the United States of America. I don’t care what the facts are.” [I have no idea if that is a genuine Bush I quote or not –blf]

    ● “A good review of what the Bush family actually has done over the decades, as opposed to the fairy tale they like to pass off as their historical “contribution” to our current situation. They were not the only politicians who ruined the potential of the 60s and early 70s, but they were eager participants.”

  274. says

    blf, thanks for comments 304 and 305. Lots of good information and analysis in there.

    It is funny/sad that residents of Chicago have to turn to The Guardian to get accurate news about the water quality in their city.

    The story of how the Republicans nurtured venality and lying is interesting and horrible. Of course, they are all christians.

    Karl Rove just got the IRS to recognize his money-raising machine (Super PAC) as a “social welfare” organization. Alternate reality indeed.

  275. says

    More weirdness from the Nevada caucus/vote procedures:

    Republicans closed their registration rolls on Feb. 13, and that is the file that will be used on Feb. 23. Democrats are allowing same-day registration on Saturday.

    So: A Republican registered by Feb. 13 could show up at a Democratic caucus site on Saturday, switch to the Democratic Party, vote and then still participate on Tuesday because the party switch would not show up on the GOP caucus rolls.

    Clark County Voter Registrar Joe Gloria confirmed Monday that this could happen. And he also pointed out that the Republican-become-Democrat could switch back to the GOP in time to vote in the June primary.

    https://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/gop-voters-could-participate-democratic-caucus

    […] Ralston noted yesterday that “organized” Republican efforts to intervene in the Democratic contest are now underway. This includes College Republicans urging members to support the “socialist” in order to help the GOP candidate “prevail” in November, […]

    I can’t help but wonder, though, if Nevada Republicans fully appreciate the potential for unintended consequences. What they want is a Sanders victory. What they don’t want is for Team Clinton to have a credible case that the results were tarnished by GOP mischief.

    If Sanders wins narrowly, don’t be too surprised if a whole lot of Dems start arguing on Saturday night, “Bernie’s victory was bolstered by an organized Republican campaign based on the belief that he’s a sure-fire loser in November.”

    Maybe Nevada Republicans should have been a little quieter about their rascally scheme? […]

    Link

  276. says

    Oh, dear. Republicans in Idaho want to use the Bible more thoroughly than they already do in public education:

    33-1604. USE OF THE BIBLE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. The Bible is expressly permitted to be used in Idaho public schools for reference purposes to further the study of literature, comparative religion, English and foreign languages, United States and world history, comparative government, law, philosophy, ethics, astronomy, biology, geology, world geography, archaeology, music, sociology, and other topics of study where an understanding of the Bible may be useful or relevant. No student will be required to use any religious texts for reference purposes if the student or parents of the student object.

    That’s text from Idaho Senate Bill No. 1232.

    Journalist Walter Einenkel suggested the following passages for biology classes, but they seem more suitable for sex miseducation to me:

    She lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses. —Ezekiel 23:20

    When a woman has a discharge, if her discharge in her body is blood, she shall continue in her menstrual impurity for seven days; and whoever touches her shall be unclean until evening. Everything also on which she lies during her menstrual impurity shall be unclean, and everything on which she sits shall be unclean. ​—Leviticus 15: 19-20

  277. says

    Goofy calendar for voting in Nevada and South Carolina:

    – Democratic caucus in Nevada, Saturday, February 20.
    – Republican primary in South Carolina, Saturday, February 20.
    – Republican caucus in Nevada, Tuesday, February 23.
    – Democratic primary in South Carolina, Saturday, February 27.

  278. says

    South Carolina Republican Representative Mark Sanford endorsed Sen. Ted Cruz for president.

    In other news, a bunch of college students protested in Washington D.C. against the unfair practices of for-profit colleges.

    Students reeling from debt incurred while attending for-profit colleges traveled to Capitol Hill Thursday to voice their struggles to the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions committee, seeking to pursue blanket discharges for debt taken on by attending expensive programs that, in reality, had little value.

    The stories told to the Senate panel were emotional. […] Alicia Stevens, who enrolled at the Florida Metropolitan University in 2005, graduated with […] little hope for a job, given the poor quality of education she received. She lives on Social Security payments, and is likely to be forced to live out of her car due to her financial situation. Another student, Alyse Zachary, was told she would be kicked out of ITT Technical Institute if she did not sign up for a high-interest private loan. She graduated $30,000 in debt. […]

    Link.

  279. says

    Sneaky and awful on all levels, Trump is, not surprisingly, deceptive when it comes to his charitable giving:

    Donald Trump’s record of charitable giving is spotty. As of August 2015, he hadn’t donated to his own foundation […] since 2008.

    Asked by the Associated Press if Trump had personally given money to other charities in that time, a Trump spokeswoman responded with a list of donations that appeared to be gifts that the foundation had made—and since Trump hadn’t given to the foundation, his spokeswoman was in other words apparently trying to pass off gifts made with other people’s money as Trump’s own.

    In January, though, Trump skipped a Fox News–hosted debate to hold an Iowa fundraiser/rally for veterans’ groups, subsequently announcing that he’d brought in $6 million, which included $1 million of his own money, for the troops. On Thursday, a Weekly Standard reporter named Michael Warren tried to find out how much of that money has actually been distributed. And the answer is that Trump’s campaign won’t say.

  280. says

    Here’s a recap of the Town Hall meeting in Nevada yesterday, the one in which Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders took questions from the audience.
    NBC link to post with both text and video.

  281. blf says

    Another one for teh wazzock trum-prat “fail to vet sources” and “tell lies” and “endorse torture” and “war crimes” and “extrajudicial actions” files , Trump recounts Pershing urban legend, seemingly endorsing mass executions:

    At a South Carolina rally Donald Trump invoked the debunked story of a WWI general executing 49 muslim terrorists as a modern lesson

    In his final campaign rally before the South Carolina primary, Donald Trump repeated an urban legend about John Pershing, the commander of the American Expeditionary Forces in World War I, committing war crimes while serving in the Philippines. Trump seemed to endorse these actions as well.

    Trump claimed that Pershing summarily executed “50 terrorists”. In the real estate mogul’s telling, “they were having terrorism problems just like we do. And he caught 50 terrorists who did tremendous damage and killed many people. And he took the 50 terrorists, and he took 50 men, and he dipped 50 bullets in pig’s blood.”

    Trump continued that Pershing then “had his men load his rifles and he lined up the 50 people, and they shot 49 of those people. And the 50th person he said: you go back to your people and you tell them what happened.”

    The story seems to stem from Pershing’s stint commanding an American garrison in the Philippines where he helped put down a rebellion in the Muslim region of Mindanao from 1909-1913.

    Despite Trump’s pledge that “this is something you can read in the history books,” the story has been debunked by the myth-busting website Snopes.

    […]

    Pershing, a decorated combat veteran who helped lead the US to victory in World War I, is one of the two men to hold the title General of the Armies in American history. The other is George Washington. Pershing’s tenure administrating Mindanao was also marked by his comparative tolerance of Islam and his appointment of Muslims to serve under him as deputy district governors.

    Plus the “exceptionally odious bigotry” file.

  282. blf says

    Teh wazzock trum-prat demonstrates his clewlessness, Trump calls for Apple boycott amid FBI feud — then sends tweets from iPhone:

    The GOP candidate told South Carolina supporters Friday not to use Apple products until ‘they give security number’ to San Bernardino shooter’s phone

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump called for a boycott of Apple products until the tech giant cooperates with the FBI’s demand to help unlock the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters.

    What I think you ought to do is boycott Apple until such time as they give that security number, Trump said at a town hall event in South Carolina. How do you like that? I just thought of that!

    That is highly sophisticated thinking for you, wazzock. It shows a complete level of not-understanding and obliviousness which would do Scalia proud. Let’s start with security number: There is no such thing. And it isn’t known to Apple.

    You probably mean the suspect’s passphrase(or similar), which — BY DESIGN — is neither known to Apple, nor recoverable, nor deducible. That is one reason the court order is for Apple to, in effect, provide a means for the FBI to brute-force guess the passphrase (that is, try possibilities until they either succeed or, possibly more likely, the heat death of the universe). One problem the FBI has here is Apple has, very sensibly and in common with other security-aware products (including those I work on), DESIGNED it so that “too many” consecutive bad attempts deliberately cause the erasure of the encrypted data.

    And then:

    Trump’s tweets after his call for the Apple boycott were all sent from an Apple iPhone.

    (I laughed lout loud…)
    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “They protect your data! Boycott them!”

    ● “How do you like that? I just thought of that!
      “It’s almost quaint, almost, that he thinks he has to announce that he “thinks.” If the stakes weren’t so high, it would be hilarious. As it is, one would hope voters pause and consider what that says about how very low the bar has been set.
      “Spontaneous blats and burps from Planet Trump do not a mindful, deliberative, considered policy make. On anything.”

    ● “How do you like that? I just thought of that! — This pretty much sums up Trumps campaign.”

    ● “If brains were dynamite, he couldn’t blow his nose.”

    ● “Great idea! Let’s boycott Apple until they make their devices so unsafe that no sane person would want to own one.”

    ● “Boycott Trump until we can snoop through his phone.”
    In reply: “Would you really want to read the drivel on it?”

    ● “Give the security number? Does he think that no one will call him out on his total ignorance?
      “What part of ‘not even Apple can break it’ does he not understand?”

    ● “How do you like that? I just thought of that! — And once again surprises himself that he had a thought. I’m sure that will go into every speech ad nauseum for weeks.”
    In reply: “I think he speaks before thinking for the most part. It sounds like he’s often surprised about what just left his own mouth.”
    In reply: “what just left his own mouth — It actually comes from another part of his anatomy.”

    ● “And so the question arises of whether Trump or any of his cronies shorted Apple stock.” [Good point! –blf]

  283. says

    blf, Trump admitted that he criticized the Pope without having ever read the actual statement the Pope had made about building walls and building bridges. Having finally read that and deciding that it wasn’t aimed directly at him, or at least not only at him, Trump had a change of heart. He’s now back to saying the Pope is a good guy.

    Trump said the ignorant stuff about Apple without researching the issue. He made the anti-Muslim comments that included General Pershing without reading the facts. That’s how he would be as a president. The horror, the horror.

  284. says

    Most of the news coverage today is all Scalia all the time, including coverage of the funeral that featured Scalia’s son, who is a priest, saying that Jesus himself was at the funeral today.

    Meanwhile, Ted Cruz continued to say stupid stuff:

    If liberals are so confident that the American people want unlimited abortion on demand, want religious liberty torn down, want the Second Amendment taken away, want veterans’ memorials torn down, want the crosses and stars of David sandblasted off of the tombstones of our fallen veterans, then go and make the case to the people.

    The quote is from an argument Cruz made on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

    Here are some facts for Ted Cruz and his conservative cronies, courtesy of Rob Boston, a spokesperson for Americans United for Separation of Church and State:

    At cemeteries like Arlington, the families of deceased veterans have the right to choose from a variety of religious and secular symbols to use as grave markers. Obviously these are private graves that memorialize the individuals buried there. That’s far removed from the government erecting a giant cross and saying it represents all veterans. I’m sure Cruz knows the difference.

  285. says

    This is a followup to comment 307. Rachel Maddow covered the possibility of Republicans voting in the Democratic caucus in Nevada.

    MSNBC was supposed to have all-day live coverage of the Nevada Democratic caucuses today, but the coverage was bumped for Scalia’s funeral. We’ll hear about the caucuses later.

    Meanwhile, Cruz is up to dirty tricks in South Carolina. Republicans are going to the polls there, but first they got a robocall from the Cruz campaign telling them that Donald Trump supports gay rights and would force “people to bake cakes and photograph gay weddings.” What Trump actually said was “That’s your thing, and other people have their thing. We have to bring all people together.” Of course, one never knows what Trump will really do.

    Here’s what Cruz’s robocall says Trump will do:

    It’s about mandatory celebration. It’s about forcing people to bake cakes and photograph gay weddings. Forcing clergy to officiate. It’s about transgender bathrooms in your child’s school. It’s about tearing down our Judeo-Christian values. It’s about tearing down our America.

    Link.

    The robocall goes on to tell voters to support Cruz “before it is too late.”

    Cruz claimed he had nothing to do with the robocalls.

  286. says

    Think Progress journalists asked Trump supporters who should be the next Supreme Court justice. Scary stuff:

    […] “Somebody just like Scalia, in just about every way,” Bill Reece […]

    “Sheriff Joe,” said Chris Horsley, referring to the staunchly anti-immigrant Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff, Joe Arpaio. “He’s a constitutionalist and he’s all for enforcing the law.” [..]

    “I keep hearing people in the media say that the next Supreme Court Justice should be a black woman,” said Mark Tolbert of Walterboro. “And I’m in total agreement with that. But I think it should be Mia Love, because she’s got the right idea and the right message.” […]

    Love is anti-abortion and has proposed deep cuts to federal spending. […]

    Trump disclosed two judges he believes would “best represent the conservative values we need to protect: William ‘Bill’ Pryor Jr. and Diane Sykes.”

    Pryor, who currently sits on the Eleventh Circuit, has described Roe v. Wade as a decision that created “a constitutional right to murder an unborn child.” He has also upheld Georgia’s voter ID law, a common method of voter suppression, and has argued that employers should be allowed to deny women health plans covering contraception. [yikes!]

    Sykes may be even more conservative than Pryor. A judge on the Seventh Circuit, Sykes has also backed a voter ID law and has argued that anti-gay groups have a constitutional right to continue receiving government subsidies even if they engage in discrimination. […]

  287. says

    Rightwing legislators in New York want to play Big Brother, or Mommy and Daddy, to all poor people. This is insulting.

    […] two lawmakers [Senators Patty Ritchie and Michael Nozzolio] have introduced a bill to ban food stamps cards from being used to buy a laundry list of foods, arguing both that poor people are too fat and that they’re currently allowed to enjoy foods that are too tasty.

    “At a time when our state and nation are struggling with an obesity epidemic, it is critically important that taxpayer funded programs help low income consumers make wise and healthy food choices,” reads a legislative memo accompanying the bill. “The purpose of SNAP is to promote good nutrition, but current rules allow the purchase of junk food and luxury items like high-end steaks and lobster.”[…]

    Sandwiches prepared at bodegas and delis, for instance, could no longer be bought with SNAP anywhere in New York. […] honey-roasted nuts, and vegetable seeds or seedlings intended to be planted at home would all be cut off […]

    The bill also instructs a state agency to go through the list of tax-exempt foods, too, and decide which of them should count as “luxuries” that should no longer be covered under SNAP. […] The list of groceries that are exempt from state sales taxes, and that could potentially be targeted by this second stage of the Ritchie and Nozzolio bill, includes staples like baking products, bouillon, cereal, instant breakfast mix, dried fruits and vegetables, peanut butter, all seafood, poultry, and meat products, and all sauces and gravies. […]

    the agency [ United States Department of Agriculture] offers a variety of incentives toward healthy eating already: Food stamps are worth double at farmers’ markets, and the agency operates pilot programs in some states to refund part of every SNAP dollar spent on fresh produce.

    What’s more, USDA research on what Americans buy and eat across different socioeconomic categories has shown that SNAP families aren’t all that different from economically independent ones — and in some ways are even smarter shoppers.

    SNAP families don’t actually drink more soda than rich families once you adjust the data for demographics. They eat less candy. They turn to cheaper proteins like chicken, pork, eggs, and beans, but consume just as much overall protein as richer shoppers. […].

    Link.

  288. says

    President Obama and Michele Obama paid their respects to Justice Scalia at the Supreme Court. They also met privately with the justice’s immediate family. So what does Donald Trump have to say about this?

    I wonder if President Obama would have attended the funeral of Justice Scalia if it were held in a Mosque? Very sad that he did not go!

    The family of Justice Scalia had agreed that the President and First Lady should not attend the memorial services that were held today. Such a visit does create a distraction from the person being memorialized. V.P. Joe Biden did attend.

    The president has been criticized for his decision not to attend Scalia’s funeral by others, but the White House had defended the decision citing Obama’s extensive security detail as one of the reasons to forgo the service.

    Yep, the first family takes up a lot of space, and their motorcade creates an even bigger traffic jam.

  289. says

    This is a followup to blf’s comment 313.

    Some Muslim civil rights groups have responded to Trump’s repetition of a debunked story about General Pershing killing Muslims.

    […] Nihad Awad, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said in a statement Saturday that Trump’s comments “crossed the line from spreading hatred to inciting violence.”

    “By directly stating that the only way to stop terrorism is to murder Muslims in graphic and religiously-offensive ways, he places the millions of innocent, law-abiding citizens in the American Muslim community at risk from rogue vigilantes,” Nihad Awad said in a statement. “He further implies that our nation should adopt a strategy of systematized violence in its engagement with the global Muslim community, a chilling message from a potential leader. We pray that no one who hears this message follows his gospel of hate.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/cair-trump-pigs-blood-incite-violence-muslims

  290. says

    So, a few Nevada caucus sites are such a clusterfuck that a a new hashtag, #KillTheCaucus is getting a lot online play.

    We have a few provisional results, to be taken with several grains of salt:

    […] With 12% reporting, it’s a dead heat. Hillary Clinton has 424 county convention delegates and Bernie Sanders has 422. […] a number of caucus sites have experienced huge delays and just generally appear to be a cluster.

    Clinton’s lead has widened a bit: 52-48 with 32% reporting, per NYT. The Times seems to be getting results faster than the official Nevada Democrat’s website, which keeps crashing.

  291. Gregory Greenwood says

    Trump’s latest bigoted idiocy is making the rounds. He applauds the use of torture and approvingly tells a horrifying (and untrue) story about the execution of Muslims with bullets dipped in pig’s blood in the early 20th century. Watch the video at your peril – warning; contains toxic levels of prejudice and stupidity.

    It gives you some of idea of how extreme Trump’s position is when even the infamously racist Daily Mail is uncomfortable with his xenophobic ranting.

  292. says

    Hillary Clinton won in Nevada. There are still a few votes coming in, but it looks like 52% for Hillary, and 48% for Sanders.

    We don’t yet have results from the Republican primary in South Carolina.

  293. says

    Gregory @324, Trump has not made enough people in the Republican Party uncomfortable. They are still voting for him.

    Trump is the projected winner of the South Carolina primary, with about 34% of the vote. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are battling it out for second place with about 22% of the vote. We don’t have all the results in yet.

    Some white evangelical christians voted for Trump instead of Cruz, which is just mind boggling.

  294. Saad says

    Lynna, #326

    Some white evangelical christians voted for Trump instead of Cruz, which is just mind boggling.

    You think the pig blood bullet comment tipped the scale for them?

    Cruz should have mentioned alcohol filled hand grenades.

  295. says

    Jeb Bush dropped out of the race for president. He was in fourth place in South Carolina.

    Donald Trump tweeted one last insult to Jeb (something about running out of energy), and then he gave an acceptance speech.

    Second place is still too close to call. It will be either Cruz or Rubio.

  296. says

    With 74% of the votes counted in South Carolina, here are the results:
    Trump 33.1%
    Rubio 22.3% (He’ll call that a win.)
    Cruz 21.7%
    Bush 8.1%
    Kasich 8.0%
    Carson 6.9%

  297. says

    Saad, evangelical christians do get a kick out of being afraid of Muslims. Fearing terrorism, and the joys of hating Muslims, are pillars of the evangelical christian world view in South Carolina. That was born out by the exit polls.

    I don’t know if the pig blood tipped the scale.

    What I think is happening is that they just want a strong man. No matter what, they want a bully, and they don’t care how offensive that bully is. They actually believe Trump when he talks, and they believe in him as a if he were a religion. One thing is for sure, they do not see the weaknesses at the base of Trump’s sand castle.

    With 84% reporting, the results look pretty much the same:
    Trump 33.0%
    Rubio 22.3%
    Cruz 21.7%
    etc.

    Rubio is now giving his “I won because I came in second” speech. He is pretending to be Ronald Reagan (name drops too many to count). “Morning in America” mentioned to many times to mention. Rubio has Nikki Haley and others onstage with him so that he can present his “new face of the Republican Party.”

  298. says

    Jeb! was as gracious in defeat as Trump was vindictive and petty in victory. Husband is watching wall-to-wall caucus and primary coverage and chortling gleefully at the prospect of a brokered convention. It’s going to be a long year…

  299. Saad says

    Lynna, #331

    No matter what, they want a bully, and they don’t care how offensive that bully is.

    I think that’s it in a nutshell.

    This is like the Gamergate pushback to people trying to improve games. The few precious progressive advances made in the past two terms have created this horrible reaction. Maddow’s observation seems right: this is the mainstream GOP attitude now.

  300. blf says

    Some more on the Gen Pershing made-up “fact” (see @313 and @321) vomited forth by teh wazzock, Memo to Trump: pork isn’t Kryptonite to Muslims. But bigotry might be yours [sic]:

    The Republican front-runner’s latest foray into Islamophobia would almost be funny, if it didn’t make being a stereotype-trafficking bigot more acceptable

    What is it with bigots and bacon?

    On Friday night, Donald Trump recounted for his supporters an inaccurate story about John Pershing, the commander of the American Expeditionary Forces in World War I, who he alleged decided to summarily execute 49 of 50 Muslim prisoners while helping to put down a rebellion in the Muslim region of Mindanao from 1909-1913. The icing on the cake? The bullets were, as he noted, dipped in pig’s blood.

    […]

    It is, of course, completely untrue: Pershing was known for his comparative tolerance of Islam and even appointed Muslims to as deputy district governors under him. It is ironic, too, because in seizing the Philippines, America simply inherited a long-running conflict between the Muslims who had once ruled from Manila and the Spanish who succeeded them.

    But Trump is hardly the first conservative to apparently believe that the sight of porcine products is Kryptonite to Muslims.

    […]

    Just put pork anywhere near us Muslims, some people seem to believe, and we’ll soon keel over in psycho-spiritual distress. (Someone should start the rumor that we respond similarly to Oreo cookies and Amazon gift cards. [giggles… –blf]) But now the leading candidate for the Republican nomination for president is supporting and encouraging his supporters to believe it.

    Next we’ll hear that if you only dip drivers licenses in pig’s fat, Muslims will be unable to bring themselves vote against him.

    […] Telling a story about dipping bullets in pig’s blood before killing 49 Muslims with impunity is particularly offensive, not least because the summary execution of so many people is a footnote to a story that traffics in crude stereotypes about our dietary restrictions. (It’s not hard to imagine the deserved outcry if the victims were adherents of another major religion who eschew pork — Jews.)

    Like many Muslims, pronouncements like these are beginning to seriously unnerve me. […] Trump is now saying openly what only the most reactionary Republicans would say in hushed tones amongst themselves because they knew it was offensive and unacceptable to nearly everyone else.

    Trump has rubbed the wrong bottle; that genie he’s conjured cannot be easily put back, even if other Republicans might want it to be.

    But it’s possible that they don’t. Of the current crop of Republican candidates, nearly all of them are warmongers, racists or bigots. Besides Jeb Bush […] and John Kasich, not one of the other candidates has had the courage to stand up to anti-Muslim sentiment except in a perfunctory or halfhearted way.

    Marco Rubio pretends like there’s no such thing as Islamophobia. Ben Carson thinks American Muslims are schizophrenic. Ted Cruz is all about carpet bombing huge swaths of the Middle East. (Why not just drop lots of pig’s heads? […]) […]

    […] People ask me, over and over, where the moderate Muslims are as though anything but a fraction are extremists.

    Maybe they should start asking where the moderate Republicans went. There definitely seem to be fewer and fewer of those.

    Some readers’s comments:

    ● “Trump takes most of his ‘facts’ from The Boys’ Big Book of Barmy Bigotry, published by Bullshit Productions.”

    ● “Trump has factcheck teflon. Its not entirely clear how it works, but apparently, nothing he says needs to be fact checked, and calling him out on mistruths deliberate or accidental matters not one bit to him, or his support base. they just don’t care. They may even love him because he says a pack of horseshit. They all want to believe it.”

    ● “Trump’s invented a new kind of political campaigning strategy, rather than just throwing a dead cat on the table to distract voters from what would normally turn into a shitstorm, he has relentlessly thrown one dead cat after another, the whole table is covered in dead cats, yet he is still popular. […]”

  301. blf says

    Lynna@314, on teh trum-prat’s alleged admission of not reading the head of the child-raptist’s comments before rejecting the chief rapist’s point: There seems to be a mistake here of believing something teh wazzock claimed.

    That is a serious goof. As I’ve said previously (paraphrasing), teh wazzock could claim he is a wazzock, and whilst seemingly true, I wouldn’t believe him. He would have to, at the least, convincingly shows he understands what a “wazzock” is. (The same concept holds true for the child-rapists’s-in-chief: Also not to be believed without convincing evidence.)

    As is to so happens, the Grauniad makes a similar point, I don’t like fighting with the pope, said Donald Trump. And we believe him (emphasis in the original):

    The pontiff is no slouch at manipulating public opinion, but in the Republican presidential hopeful he has met his match
    […]
    Barack Obama remarked this week of the presidency that it was not reality television, yet running for the position appears to have smashed through that particular looking-glass and now occupies the hallucinogenic territory of unreality TV. How else to characterise the pope suggesting that the would-be Republican nominee is not Christian because of his plan to build a wall to keep out Mexicans, followed by Trump releasing a statement declaring that the pontiff will be praying and wishing that he, Donald, was president when Isis [daesh] storms the Vatican? Want some more? Good, because this was followed by a senior Trump campaign staff member tweeting photos of the walled Vatican with captions best summarised as “It’s a goddamn fortress”.

    […] Donald Trump thinks like a terrorist. His entire schtick is acts of verbal violence which hijack or disrupt legitimate discussions anywhere and wrench them into some brutishly mesmeric realm where normal rules just got blown up and the savage exercise of power is the message as much as whatever the actual message is supposed to be. It is absolutely no surprise to find Trump an apparently easy fit for an al-Shabaab recruiting video — each of these supposed adversaries speaks the only language the other can understand.

    […].

    I can only describe Trump’s latest manoeuvre as a “dead pope strategy” [ref. “dead cat” in @334’s readers’s comments –blf]. One minute we were contemplating gospel teachings against walls; now we’ve got Francis trussed up in an orange jumpsuit. Yet again it feels as if Trump’s endlessly discombobulated rivals should simply unite under the campaign slogan: What Just Happened?

    […]

    [… T]he latest developments indicate that both men are now tap-dancing away from a showdown in the absolute crock-osseum. As is his custom, having got the airplay for something, Trump is now blithely backtracking. At a town hall in South Carolina on Thursday evening, he dropped what would once have sounded like a line from South Park but now feels like just another day’s news in this psychotropically unconventional campaign. Actually, he mused: I don’t like fighting with the pope. Well quite. It’s like the new political dictum goes: never fight with a pope. You both get dirty but the pope likes it.

  302. blf says

    First Dog on the Moon (also in the Grauniad) weighs in on the child-rapist-in-chief’s vs wazzock penis-waving contest, Donald Trump: ‘Pope Francis can’t promise Americans any of this amazing stuff but I can!’ (cartoon): “A spokesperson for Pope Francis said that for Donald Trump to call the pope a prawn is a bit much and it doesn’t even make sense — we call them shrimp in this country”.

    Despite the mention of both trebuchets and cheese, the mildly deranged penguin has no recollection of being involved with the production of this cartoon. Also, the cartoon’s Obama-Scalia conspiracy theory is entirely wrong, as the mildly deranged penguin recently proved.

  303. says

    blf @335:

    Lynna@314, on teh trum-prat’s alleged admission of not reading the head of the child-raptist’s comments before rejecting the chief rapist’s point: There seems to be a mistake here of believing something teh wazzock claimed.

    Quite true. I should have thought of that

    In other news, with almost all Nevada precincts reporting, Clinton’s victory is clearer, with the tally being 53% to Sanders’ 47%. Clinton will pick up 19 delegates, and Sanders 15 delegates. In his speech, Sanders noted how far they had come (from practically nothing to being a viable contender), about which he is right. Another thing to note about Nevada, turnout was lower than it was in 2008.

  304. says

  305. Gregory Greenwood says

    Lynna, OM @ 326;

    Trump has not made enough people in the Republican Party uncomfortable. They are still voting for him.

    I know – it’s hard to credit isn’t it? Every time I think the Repubs can’t do anything to further worsen my opinion of them, they always find a way to surprise me.

    Some white evangelical christians voted for Trump instead of Cruz, which is just mind boggling.

    It seems that reactionary bigotry and hatred actually can substitute for nauseating public piety for Evangelical voters, so long as you hate the ‘right’ people with sufficient vitriol. As you say @ 331;

    What I think is happening is that they just want a strong man. No matter what, they want a bully, and they don’t care how offensive that bully is. They actually believe Trump when he talks, and they believe in him as a if he were a religion. One thing is for sure, they do not see the weaknesses at the base of Trump’s sand castle.

    In some ways, Trump is your standard issue rightwing tough guy – he talks about war and bringing down the wrath of the imaginary sky fairy on the heads of the ‘bad guys’ in the full knowledge that he will never be asked to put his own worthless hair piece hide on the line. He is a blowhard as you say, and some Evangelicals are so desperate to hear that empty posturing that they will vote for him even though he doesn’t share their religious beliefs.

    Saad also makes a good point @ 333 – this does feel a lot like the Gamergate push back. Even mild and limited progressive advances result in testerical flailing from the religious right, and they will back anyone who promises to roll back that progress and cement their unearned privilege that they feel was being threatened.

  306. blf says

    A collection of quite extreme slimely kleptomaniacs in the UK has been pushing the idea of a so-called “Brexit” — the UK leaving the EU — for some decades now. Until recently, they’ve been told to go stuff their heads back up their arses. However, the current UK Prime Minister (PM) is as throughly dishonest and incompetent as teh trum-prat, and even more useless than most politicians, and has wound up ordering a referendum (albeit rigged) in June this year on whether or not the UK should stay in the EU. The vote is rigged in multiple ways, the one which affects me personally is that UK citizens (insultingly called “subjects”) who have not lived in the UK for something like more than two years are not eligible to vote in the June referendum. Which is a not-so-neat way of denying expatriates (like me) any say in our livelihoods or legal status. (This is not the only rigging which has been going on.)

    One of the many racists in the UK’s nasty party (the equivalent of the States’s thug party), who also form the current UK “government”, has now openly shown some of the exceptionally dubious claims “supporting” a “Brexit”, Iain Duncan Smith: UK risks Paris-style attacks by staying in the EU:

    Work and pensions secretary campaigning for Brexit suggests open borders endanger Britain’s security

    The UK will be more exposed to Paris-style terror attacks if it stays in the EU, Iain Duncan Smith, one of the cabinet ministers campaigning for Brexit, has suggested.

    The former leader of the Tory party, who is now work and pensions secretary, warned the EU was in meltdown about a “massive wave of migration”, with people from Pakistan and Iran coming into EU countries alongside Syrian refugees.

    The UK has basically accepted no refugees. (The UK “government” of course claims otherwise.) The handful that have been admitted were supposedly required to apply from, and stay in, Syria. I have no idea how actually followed that Assad-friendly rule, but given the corruption of both governments and the desperation of most refugees, presume it isn’t very many.

    In an interview with the BBC, he claimed other EU countries could give passports to migrants who may end up in the UK and then appeared to link this to a risk of Paris-style terrorism.

    “There is another concern and risk: the migration issue, in meltdown around the EU, with the EU almost incapable, it seems, of handling this massive wave of migration coming in from, not just by the way Syria. We hear today about Pakistanis and others coming into Hungary and having a problem. You see various people from different parts of Iran are coming in. It’s not just from one country,” he said.

    Islamphobia, hello! Baseless rumourmongering, hello!! Factfree claims, hello!!! Teh trum-prat, hello!!!!

    [… I]t directly contradicts that of David Cameron [the useless PM], who has said staying in the EU is vital for Britain’s security as it shares information about terror threats with other member states.

    […] Lucy Thomas, deputy director of the Britain Stronger In Europe campaign, said: “In recent weeks we have heard from a wide range of experts with frontline experience of the fight against terrorism that Britain’s streets are safer [than (I presume –blf)] in Europe. Though Iain Duncan Smith may wish to ignore them, the message is clear from the head of Europol, army chiefs and home secretaries past and present, that cooperating with our European allies is crucial to keeping British people safe.

    “The European arrest warrant lets us deport terrorist suspects back to their country of origin, Europol helps our police cooperate with their European counterparts, and EU data-sharing measures allow our security services to access information on threats from anywhere in Europe within minutes.”

    Sighs… This “my streets are safer than your streets” penis-waving is largely missing any useful points. Far more useful is “who is not racist?” and similar, such as “who treats everyone fairly? …equally? …with the rule of law?”, et al.

  307. blf says

    Amusingly, Trump’s own Christian denomination defies him on immigration policy:

    Presbyterian church has voted several times in favor of granting a route to legal status for the 11 million undocumented people currently living in the US

    Donald Trump […] now faces the wrath of his own Presbyterian church leadership who say his hardline views on immigration are out of line with its teachings.

    Gradye Parsons, the most senior elected official of the Presbyterian Church (USA) to which Trump was baptized as a child, said that the Bible is clear: followers of the faith have to care for the needy. “Donald Trump’s views are not in keeping with the policies adopted by our church by deliberative process,” he said.

    In an interview with the Guardian, Parsons said that the Presbyterian church had voted several times since the 1990s in its national general assemblies in favor of comprehensive immigration reform that would grant a route to legal status for the 11 million undocumented people currently living in the US. “Our official policy is to encourage immigration reform.”

  308. says

    blf @341, I hadn’t realized how closely some UK politicians hewed to the Trum-Prat’s islamophobia. I mean, I knew it was there, and that it was ugly, but I hadn’t realized the extent of it, nor how deeply it was embedded in politics there.

    BTW, it is definitely not right that they want to exclude expatriates from voting.

  309. says

    Ted Cruz said some more stupid stuff about adding to the already bloated military budget:

    Starting next year our sailors won’t be on their knees with their hands on their heads,” Cruz said, referring to the U.S. sailors who were held in Iranian custody after their [riverine boat] entered that country’s waters. “Our secretary of State will not be apologizing and thanking their Iranian captors. Instead, they will be standing on the decks of the mightiest ships the world has ever known with their heads held high, confident that the great country that they volunteered to serve has their back.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-02-16/ted-cruz-calls-for-return-to-bush-era-military-spending

    […] [Cruz] wants to increase the Air Force to 6,000 planes, lift the number of military personnel to 1.4 million from 1.34 million, and build more battleships as part of growing the Navy to at least 350 ships. His proposal to increase the Pentagon’s budget—including the slush fund known as Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO)—to 4.1 percent of gross domestic product during his first two years in office would raise the 2017 fiscal year budget to $738 billion, a 26 percent increase from what President Obama has proposed. That compares with the peak war budget of $699 billion in 2011.

    Link

    Cruz proposes to pay for the increases in the military budget by getting rid of the Internal Revenue Service; and the following departments: Education, Housing and Urban Development, Energy, and Commerce.

    Four-star Air Force Gen. Paul Selva, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, replied to Cruz’s proposal: “I won’t be argumentative but I will take umbrage with the notion that our military has been gutted … I stand here today a person that’s worn this uniform for 35 years. At no time in my career have I been more confident than this instant in saying we have the most powerful military on the face of the planet.”

  310. says

    Trump pretends to be innocent:

    […] CNN’s “State of the Union” host Jake Tapper asked Trump how he expected to win the general election with the groups’ support.

    “Well, that, I know nothing about,” Trump said. “I mean, I don’t know about retweeting. I mean, you retweet somebody, and turns out to be a white supremacist. I know nothing about these groups that are supporting me.”

    Link

  311. Nick Gotts says

    blf@341, Lynna, OM@343,

    I agree with blf’s main point – those leading the push for an “Out” vote in the EU referendum on 23rd June are for the most part a collection of odious xenophobes and racists. But it’s still tempting (I am resisting the temptation) to wish for an “Out” vote, as it would certainly lead to an interesting political situation, and the political downfall of a number of repulsive individuals. At the least, Cameron would have to resign as Prime Minister (that’s a political “have to”, not a constitutional one); but beyond that, the majority of the ruling party’s MP, and of the cabinet, would have spent the past 4 months backing an outcome the voters have now rejected. Could they credibly continue to run the country? In the event of an “Out” vote, there would still have to be negotiations with the rest of the EU on the divorce terms, and the Tory party could well still be split between the “Ins” (trying to save as much as possible from the wreck) and the “Outs” (trying to show Johnny Foreigner what for). Beyond that again, the great majority of the political and economic establishment are “Ins” – but the right-wing press, including Murdoch, is heavily “Out”. Opportunities for the left can be envisaged, but the most likely outcome would be an economic crash as financial capital fled the uncertainties of London, followed by a hard right “little England”* government. And the implications for the rest of the EU could be dire: the UK has been a constant pain in the nether regions, but its decision to leave, coupled with the other crises the EU is enmeshed in, might be enough to shake it to pieces. In which case, we’ll perhaps find out what role the EU has had in preventing wars between its members.

    Even more interesting would be an overall “Out” vote despite “In” votes from some of the constituent parts of the UK (England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland). The most plausible case is Scotland voting “In”, but being outvoted – that could reignite the campaign for a second Independence referendum. The next most plausible is England voting narrowly “Out”, while Scotland and Northern Ireland vote heavily “In”, giving the latter a tiny overall majority.

    *England, not Britain or the UK. The other constituents of the UK would be likely to lose what autonomy they now have.

  312. Nick Gotts says

    @246

    Even more interesting would be an overall “Out” vote despite “In” votes

    should be:

    Even more interesting would be an overall vote one way despite votes the other way

  313. says

    I’m going to keep my eye on that “Out” vote in the UK. Looks like a bag of worms to me.

    In other news, let’s put a stake through the heart of idea that it is “common practice” or “tradition” for the Senate to forego considering lifetime appointments during the last year of a President’s term. We all already know that is hogwash, but it is now being repeated and repeated—not only on rightwing media outlets, but (FFS) has now gotten a firm toehold in mainstream media.

    WTF? Does no one check the facts anymore? Multiple sources anyone?

    […]
    Republicans are lying. There is no “common practice” that justifies their blockade strategy, and there is no “tradition” to honor. The gambit GOP senators have launched is simply without precedent in the American experience.

    Whether or not some “agrees” or “disagrees” with one party’s talking points is irrelevant. Partisans can respect traditions, norms, and common practices, but they can’t simply make them up out of whole cloth — and reporters certainly shouldn’t help them by playing along.[…]

    I snipped a long section giving examples of Republican senators taking supposedly “moderate” positions; namely that they might consider a nominee who agreed with Scalia’s “constitutional position,” but who was not “nominated for political purposes.” That’s not moderate. That’s cognitive dissonance combined with obstructionism and stupidity.

    The New York Times this morning noted other Republicans thinking along similar lines.

    “The fact is, no one knows who is going to win the election,” said Richard G. Lugar, the former Republican senator from Indiana. “Therefore, speculating that whoever is nominated is going to be in a better position may be an error.” […] “I can understand their reluctance given the controversy that surrounds all of the debate that has already occurred,” Mr. Lugar said. “But that is not sufficient reason to forgo your duty.”

    His view was shared by Olympia J. Snowe, a former moderate Republican senator from Maine. “I believe that the process should go forward and be given a good-faith effort – and ultimately people will come to their own decision on a vote on a nominee,” she said in a statement.

    Neither Lugar nor Snowe will have a vote. Their party left them behind quite a while ago. […]

    Link.

  314. says

    Donald Trump has now started some Birther nonsense about Marco Rubio. That’s Trump’s favorite thing. He begins by saying it is not him that’s asking the question, but other people are. Then he gets more into it. He did that with President Obama. He did it with Ted Cruz. Now he’s doing it with Rubio.

    All of the Birther theories from Trump rest on bigotry, racism and reliance on questionable sources. Sleazy.

  315. says

    John Kasich, the governor of Ohio and the occasionally reasonable Republican candidate for president, just showed his rightwing side again. He signed another law attacking Planned Parenthood.

    The bill targets roughly $1.3 million in funding that Planned Parenthood receives through Ohio’s health department. The money, which is mostly federal, supports initiatives for HIV testing, breast and cervical cancer screenings, and prevention of violence against women. The legislation prohibits such funds from going to entities that perform or promote abortions.

    Link

  316. says

    […] “Reagan appointed someone to the court in his last year, LBJ did the same thing,” says Michael Eric Dyson,” a scholar and author of The Black Presidency: Barack Obama and the Politics of Race. “Why was it legitimate for those men in an earlier epoch, but not Barack Obama? How can we conclude anything but race?” […]

    This article is a summary of all the tactics Republicans have used to delegitimize the first black president.

  317. says

    Well, this is a first. The Ted Cruz campaign finally apologized for one of its many dirty tricks.

    Seems they concocted an ad which showed Rubio saying that there are “not many answers” in the Bible, but what Rubio actually said was “All the answers are in there.”

    I think Cruz is concerned about losing a segment of the evangelical christian vote to both Rubio and Trump. And that’s the voting bloc to which Cruz pandered so thoroughly that he even appeared on stage with guys shouting about killing gay people.

  318. says

    This is good news. Workers in Las Vegas have won a battle with Trump. I hope this news takes a few points off Trump’s lead in Nevada.

    Just days before Nevada’s Republican presidential caucus, a federal labor official weighed in on the ongoing dispute between Donald Trump’s signature luxury Las Vegas hotel and the hundreds of workers who voted in December to unionize.

    Trump Hotel management had asked the National Labor Relations Board to throw out the results of that election, claiming that organizers from the Culinary Workers Union intimidated and coerced employees into voting yes, which “interfered with their ability to exercise a free and reasoned choice.” But after weeks of reviewing the evidence, the labor board did not agree.

    Hearing Officer Lisa Dunn announced: “I recommend that the Employer’s objections be overruled in their entirety.”

    Oh, how I wish we could overturn all of Trump’s labor/political policies in their entirety. Unfortunately, I don’t think Trump is done fighting. We know how much he hates to lose:

    Trump’s management has already withdrawn some of their objections, but still refuses to recognize the union. They have two weeks to challenge this new recommendation.

    Now, the hotel’s 500-odd workers say they will continue pressuring the Trump Hotel management to recognize their bargaining unit and join them at the table to hammer out a first contract with the Culinary Workers Union and Bartenders Union.

    They plan to take advantage of Donald Trump himself coming to Las Vegas to campaign ahead of Tuesday’s Republican caucus, and will gather in the same building where he’s holding a rally Monday night to demand he negotiate with them. They will also take to the streets outside the Trump International Hotel on Tuesday, the day of the Republican caucus.

    “He says he wants to make America great,” housekeeper Marisela Olvera told ThinkProgress in December. “Well, he should start here in his own house, his own business. He always brags about how he has millions and millions and millions of dollars, but he pays his workers less than most in Las Vegas.”

    Olvera said it was management and its anti-labor law firm, not the union, who intimidated workers during the organizing drive.[…]

    Well, that sounds like Trump all right. He had his lawyers bully the workers.

    […] “They told us the union only wants our money, that if we supported the union we’d lose our jobs, that the company would put our names on a blacklist and no other hotels in Las Vegas would hire us. They told us to think of what our children would do if we were out of work.” […]

    Link.

    Trump continues to make treating workers right a major part of his stump speech. His actions are the opposite of the words that come out of his mouth.

  319. says

    Ted Cruz’s father is pushing harder for the evangelical christian community to vote for his son. Rafael Cruz said:

    My son Ted and his family spent six months in prayer seeking God’s will for this decision. But the day the final green light came on, the whole family was together.

    It was a Sunday. We were all at his church, First Baptist Church in Houston, including his senior staff. After the church service, we all gathered at the pastor’s office. We were on our knees for two hours seeking God’s will.

    At the end of that time, a word came through his wife, Heidi. And the word came, just saying, “Seek God’s face, not God’s hand.” And I’ll tell you, it was as if there was a cloud of the holy spirit filling that place. Some of us were weeping, and Ted just looked up and said, “Lord here am I, use me. I surrender to you, whatever you want.” And he felt that was a green light to move forward.

    Yuck. More “Ted Cruz is the face of God” assholery.

    Heidi was probably just getting damned tired of kneeling for two hours.

  320. tomh says

    @ #355
    Imagine that being the face of the US Presidency. That’s the kind of thing I think of every time I see a Sanders supporter say, “I’ll never vote for Hillary.”

  321. says

    Some news hosts have flagged the “Hillary Clinton is not trustworthy” meme as a rightwing tactic that’s been used for a couple of decades. Now that meme sticks, even in Democratic circles. There are plenty of issues on which to question Clinton, but the overall, generalized “not trustworthy” meme is one the rightwing is pushing.

    Here’s just one example of a news program pushing back, however ineffectively:

    SALLY KOHN [of CNN]: There’s no question that Hillary starts off with a sort of deficit in this area, and if it’s because she’s a well-known politician, if it’s because of the different standards that women are judged against men — you know, we can sort of speculate as to why that is.

    But Trump’s a really interesting example. Because apparently people think he’s — they trust him a lot because he just says whatever he thinks, even though most of the things he says are pretty outrageous and ridiculous, and it makes you think there’s a sort of inverse relationship between trust and credentials to actually be a thoughtful, leaderful president of the United States. […]

    This is a really – no, but I mean, this is sort of a reality TV show kind of issue to be bringing up as opposed to actual credentials for leadership.[…]

    I wasn’t, sort of, being too glib when I said there’s a reality TV sort of dimension that’s entering American politics […]

    And again, whether that’s what you actually want in the White House and in positions of leadership is an interesting question. The other thing is, let’s be clear, we’re doing it right now.

    That last sentence is Kohn referencing the fact that the program she is on is also painting a generalized “untrustworthy” picture of Clinton without providing details.

    This is a story, this is a narrative that has been built up about Hillary Clinton, largely by the right, absorbed by Democrats and the mainstream — including her critics — and repeated by the media. […] We have to be careful in not repeating these smears. And again, let’s focus on the issues and what’s really at stake.

    Link.

    Trump has been pushing the “dishonest” and “liar” and “not to be trusted” line against Hillary Clinton, and he has been pushing it hard.

    I think that’s different from critics of Clinton picking a particular example of her actions or words and saying that they disagree, or that they think Clinton didn’t tell the whole truth.

  322. says

    Apparently there is no such thing as pandering too much to the religious rightwing.

    Republican presidential candidates Sen. Ted Cruz and Dr. Ben Carson are scheduled to attend the National Religious Broadcasters’ “Proclaim 16” Convention, which will run from February 23 to 26 in Nashville, TN. The annual convention has a history of anti-LGBT and anti-Muslim content, and this year’s convention will feature three anti-LGBT hate groups, a panel sponsored by the Islamophobic extremist organization behind Trump’s proposed Muslim ban, and multiple notoriously anti-gay extremist speakers. […]

    There’s been a lot of discussion about not blaming Bernie Sanders for comments made by “Bernie Bros.” Yeah, I agree. The difference is that Sanders is not attending a convention hosted by Bernie Bros. Cruz and Carson willing associate with and support organizations and individuals that are violently anti-gay and anti-Muslim.

    Sanders does not associate with nor support anti-feminist voters.

  323. says

    In Utah control of money mixes with the mormon religion to create an “unelected governor” in Zions Bank President and CEO Scott Anderson.

    Ask heavyweights in Utah’s political community about Zions Bank President and CEO Scott Anderson and they’ll say he’s “Utah’s unelected governor,” a “backroom boss” and the man you must see before running for office. […]

    He [Anderson] has stuck his nose into tight elections […]

    […] he invited prominent Republicans to visit his second floor office across from LDS Temple Square in downtown Salt Lake City in hopes of persuading them […]

    So why is Zions Bancorporation, with operations in 11 Western states, taking a stance on Utah’s electoral system or the mayor’s race? It’s not, and that is something Anderson regularly has to explain.

    “I do have to be careful and I try to be very careful in making clear when I speak for the bank and when I speak as an individual citizen,” […]

    Not buying that last bit. It reminds me very much of mormon leaders saying they were “speaking as men and not as prophets” when they want to dabble in politics.

    […] Anderson recognizes that part of his clout comes from Zions Bank, which has ties directly to Brigham Young and the Mormon hierarchy. . […]

    http://www.sltrib.com/news/3519389-155/utahs-unelected-governor-the-political-clout

  324. blf says

    Public toilets — the key battleground for bigots wanting to legislate trans people out of existence:

    The reasoning behind South Dakota’s ill-judged new law would be ludicrous if it weren’t so dangerous

    In an alarming display of institutionalised discrimination last week, the South Dakota state senate passed a bill requiring transgender students to use locker rooms and toilets corresponding to the sex they were assigned at birth. In other words, if Republican governor Dennis Daugaard signs the bill into law, trans girls will be forced to use the boys’ bathroom and trans boys the girls’, regardless of the impact on their physical safety or mental health, or of the bigotry it may foster in their cisgender classmates. We teach our children how to treat each other. This bill teaches them that trans people are liars, they are predators, and discriminating against them is a moral obligation.

    Similar legislation has been proposed in other states […]. The supposed reasoning is always the same, and would be uproariously ludicrous if it weren’t so dangerous: letting trans people choose which bathroom they feel most comfortable using is not “safe” for the rest of us, anti-trans activists claim. Trans people are trying to sneak into your bathroom to look at your genitals. Cisgender men could pose as trans women in an elaborate long con to sneak into your bathroom to look at your genitals. Everyone wants to look at your genitals! Going to the bathroom is ruined!

    […]

    This conversation has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with transphobia. We already have laws against sexual predation and harassment in public toilets […]. And, anyway, as Marcie Bianco reported […] last year, claims that letting trans people use the toilet is somehow a “safety” issue are founded on literally nothing. “Vincent Villano, the director of communications for the National Center for Transgender Equality, [said] in an email that there isn’t any firm data to corroborate these lawmakers’ claims, and that NCTE has ‘not heard of a single instance of a transgender person harassing a non-transgender person in a public restroom. Those who claim otherwise have no evidence that this is true and use this notion to prey on the public’s stereotypes and fears about transgender people.’”

    Meanwhile, I know plenty of trans people who don’t feel safe using public toilets because they have experienced glares and harassment from cis[gender] people who buy into this rhetoric. […]

    The far-right Christian lobbyist organisation the Family Research Council (which was listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center in 2010) announced a five-point plan last year to, as [Brynn] Tannehill put it, “legislate transgender people out of existence by making the legal, medical and social climate too hostile for anyone to transition in”. Point three in the plan is: Transgender people should not be legally allowed to use facilities in accordance with their gender identity.

    “Use one bathroom,” Tannehill wrote, envisioning a world in which the FRC’s plan succeeds, “and it’s a felony. Use the other, and you’re likely to be beaten, maybe to death. If you fight back against your attackers, you’ll go to a prison for people of the opposite gender, that guarantees you will continue to be raped, beaten and denied medical care.” This is deliberate, it is systematic, and it is happening.

  325. says

    The Catholic Archbishop in St. Louis is warning all Catholics to stay away from the Girl Scouts.

    What, exactly, does Archbishop Carlson dislike about the Girl Scouts?
    – the organization advocates for sex education
    – their commitment to reproductive rights, including contraception

    […] I take all of these concerns very seriously. Therefore, I am asking each pastor that allows Girl Scout troops to meet on parish property to conduct a meeting with troop leadership to review these concerns and discuss implementing alternative options for the formation of our girls.

    Our primary obligation is to help our girls grow as women of God. Several alternative organizations exist, many of which have a Catholic or Christian background. For more information on each of these organizations and a more detailed listing of ongoing concerns, please visit archstl.org/scouting.

    I ask that you carefully study each organization and strongly consider offering one of these programs in your parish instead of Girl Scouts. […]

    Archdiocese of St. Louis link. PDF.

  326. blf says

    On the “brexit” nonsense, there’s a rather good letter in today’s Grauniad, which I quote almost entirely in full, What’s the EU ever done for us? This lot…:

    […] What did the EEC/EU ever do for us? Not much, apart from: providing 57% of our trade; structural funding to areas hit by industrial decline; clean beaches and rivers; cleaner air; lead free petrol; restrictions on landfill dumping; a recycling culture; cheaper mobile charges; cheaper air travel; improved consumer protection and food labelling; a ban on growth hormones and other harmful food additives; better product safety; single market competition bringing quality improvements and better industrial performance; break up of monopolies; Europe-wide patent and copyright protection; no paperwork or customs for exports throughout the single market; price transparency and removal of commission on currency exchanges across the eurozone; freedom to travel, live and work across Europe; funded opportunities for young people to undertake study or work placements abroad; access to European health services; labour protection and enhanced social welfare; smoke-free workplaces; equal pay legislation; holiday entitlement; the right not to work more than a 48-hour week without overtime; strongest wildlife protection in the world; improved animal welfare in food production; EU-funded research and industrial collaboration; EU representation in international forums; bloc EEA negotiation at the WTO; EU diplomatic efforts to uphold the nuclear non-proliferation treaty; European arrest warrant; cross border policing to combat human trafficking, arms and drug smuggling; counter terrorism intelligence; European civil and military co-operation in post-conflict zones in Europe and Africa; support for democracy and human rights across Europe and beyond; investment across Europe contributing to better living standards and educational, social and cultural capital.

    All of this is nothing compared with its greatest achievements: the EU has for 60 years been the foundation of peace between European neighbours after centuries of bloodshed. It furthermore assisted the extraordinary political, social and economic transformation of 13 former dictatorships, now EU members, since 1980. […] We in the UK should reflect on whether our net contribution of £7bn out of total government expenditure of £695bn is good value. […]
      –Simon Sweeney (Lecturer in international political economy, University of York)

  327. starfleetdude says

    Some interesting news from a few weeks ago about atheism being less stigmatized politically now:

    Faith and the 2016 Campaign – (Pew)

    Not much movement lately as compared from 2011 to 2014, but there’s still a bit. Perhaps by 2020 a majority may not care about whether someone is an atheist or not.

  328. says

    Good news regarding one vaccination program:

    Thanks to a vaccination program that began a decade ago, fewer U.S. women are entering adulthood infected with a sexually transmitted virus that can cause cancer, new research shows.

    The study, published Monday in Pediatrics, is the first to show falling levels of dangerous strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV) among women in their early 20s. Researchers believe those women are the leading edge of a generation that should see fewer cases of cervical, vaginal, anal and throat cancers in the decades ahead.

    The quoted text is from USA Today.

    The NY Times covered the story and noted that the vaccine “has already reduced the virus’s prevalence in teenage girls by almost two-thirds.”

    The CDC notes that, “We would see greater impact with greater vaccine coverage.”

    We don’t have greater vaccine coverage thanks in large part to far right members of the Republican Party. Their approach has been to claim that getting the vaccine encourages minors to have sex. Or worse.

    Michele Bachmann even once claimed that the HPV vaccine causes mental retardation. Rick Perry used to back the use of the common-sense vaccine in Texas, until he was excoriated by rightwing religious doofuses. Perry backed down. Nikki Haley vetoed an HPV vaccine bill passed by the South Carolina legislature.

    This is current political news in Nevada where Representative Joe Heck, who is running for the Senate, said the HPV vaccine was like “coddling smokers who contract lung cancer.”

    Maddow Blog link.

  329. says

    Blackmail in South Carolina: it’s between the governor’s office and the City Council of Charlotte. The goal: to make sure LGBT nondiscrimination laws do not pass.

    North Carolina is one of the few states without a collection of anti-LGBT bills pending (aside from a Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) proposed last year), but that could change if Gov. Pat McCrory (R) decides to retaliate against the city of Charlotte.

    Last year, Charlotte’s City Council defeated an LGBT nondiscrimination law by a tight 6-5 vote, and this year, council members are once again considering a similar provision. This weekend, McCrory told two of the council members that if they approve the protections, the legislature will intervene and he will eagerly sign a bill banning bathroom access for transgender people.

    […] Several other cities and counties in North Carolina already offer at least employment protections based on gender identity, and the University of North Carolina system also protects gender identity in employment and admission […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2016/02/22/3751987/north-carolina-charlotte-lgbt-mccrory/

  330. says

    This sounds like a much-needed documentary. I wonder if Republican politicians will watch it as closely as they watched the deceptive videos from the Center for Medical Progress?

    Dawn Porter didn’t know that the release of her documentary, Trapped, would coincide with the Supreme Court case that will either enforce or dismantle the very abortion restrictions Trapped aims to illuminate.

    She did know, though, that she had met an exceptional character in the form of Dr. Willie Parker. Parker, a black physician from Alabama, has dedicated his career to providing reproductive healthcare, including abortions, for women in the South. He travels among Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi to serve as many women as he can. […]

    In the restrictive world of the TRAP laws for which her documentary is named — Targeted Regulations of Abortion Providers, which is exactly what it sounds like — Porter found a story about people she sensed she hadn’t heard enough about before: Low-income women and women of color who seek abortions. She was stunned at the lengths to which clinics need to go to stay open when conservative politicians want to legislate them out of existence. […]

    Link.

    Scroll down to watch the video excerpt.

    There’s additional text at the link, including an interview with Dawn Porter.

  331. says

    Kweisi Mfume, former president and CEO of the NAACP, endorsed Hillary Clinton.

    “For decades, Hillary Clinton has demonstrated her commitment to fighting for Black and Latino communities in both deed and action,” Mfume’s endorsement reads. “She is a proven leader with a long record of working for everyday people and getting the job done. She has been a remarkable colleague and friend who I know and trust.”

  332. says

    Uh, yeah. So this kind of whacko attitude is why a lot of Trump’s supporters were not bothered when Trump criticized the Pope:

    A New Hampshire state representative who once said Donald Trump is the only politician she believes in came to the Republican candidate’s defense during his tiff with Pope Francis on Thursday, calling the Pope “the anti-Christ.” […]

    Rep. Susan DeLemus (R) wrote: “The Pope is the anti-Christ. [sic] Do your research.” […] if you read the Geneva Bible, which is the Bible I use when we study, the commentary is – actually by the founders of the United States actually, the Protestant Church – their commentary references the papacy as the anti-Christ,” DeLemus said. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/susan-delemus-pope-antichrist

  333. says

    At first, a lot of rightwing media did not even cover the random shootings in Kalamazoo, Michigan that took place over the weekend. I’m sure they would have covered the events if the shooter had been black. But white guy Jason Brian Dalton made them uncomfortable.

    Well, it looks like rightwing media has now found a comfortable way to cover the white Uber driver who killed six people: they are calling him a “progressive.” Why? Dalton used to work for Progressive Insurance.

  334. blf says

    Another glimpse into a thuggian future (yes, Poland again!), Poland’s leading daily feels full force of Jarosław Kaczyński’s anger:

    Gazeta Wyborcza columnist Adam Leszczyński on how it is being targeted by the country’s most powerful politician

    Jarosław Kaczyński, the leader of Poland’s ruling Law and Justice party, has a very special place in his heart for Gazeta Wyborcza, the leading Polish daily newspaper. He hates it.

    The most powerful politician in the country gave a hour-long lecture in January at a seminar organised by an ultra-conservative Catholic journalism school in Toruń, northern Poland. The seminar was titled The Faces of Manipulation, and a substantial part of Kaczyński’s speech was devoted to Gazeta.

    After the fall of communism in 1989, Kaczyński said, the newspaper disseminated “liberalism, anti-traditionalism, anti-catholicism” and was “against the very notion of the nation”.

    He accused Gazeta of using the “pedagogics of shame”, by which he meant the destruction of Polish national pride, by reminding Poles about the less illustrious moments of our history such as the role of Polish collaborators in the Holocaust.

    No wonder that for many of Law and Justice supporters, whose party came into government 100 days ago this week, Gazeta Wyborcza is the nexus of all evil: it spreads western, liberal values and vigorously defends institutions created by 25 years of democracy, which Kaczyński considers to be a shameful period of Poland’s history.

    Kaczyński’s ministers have explicitly forbidden government institutions to advertise in the paper and cancelled subscriptions for government offices and courts. It seems vindictive and petty, but for Law and Justice it was a symbolic act of long-delayed justice: the hated newspaper is not going to get a penny from government coffers.

    In my 22 years of work for Gazeta I have never felt such pressure — and I never got so much hate mail, a lot of it full of antisemitic vitriol.

    […]

    While the conservative politicians and their supporters claim that they do not care what Europe thinks, they react with pain and anger to criticism in the western media — even more so when the stories are written by Polish journalists.

    My colleagues from Gazeta who have written for the German press were labelled “traitors” by rightwing media and their fans on the internet. These tough defenders of national pride and tradition have surprisingly sensitive feelings.

    So far they can only talk: our readership has gone up since the elections and morale in the newsroom is high. If Gazeta disappeared somehow from the Polish media landscape, the government would probably announce this date as a holiday.

    Mr Wyborcza notes that’s it not impossible for the lunatics’s supporters to try a hostile takeover of Gazeta Wyborcza’s owners. I myself presume the loonies will eventually try a seemingly-simpler route and find some reason to close the paper, and/or arrest / detain its staff, and/or deny the paper supplies (e.g., paper). However, the EU(at least) is currently glaring quite hard at the loonies and reminding them of such basic concepts as the “rule of law”.

  335. dianne says

    Anyone want to have the opportunity to use the word “schadenfreude” in a sentence? Pegida is costing Dresden tourists. It seems that people don’t want to visit a place full of right wing nuts who hate everyone who is even slightly different from them. Who would have thought it?

  336. says

    Part of the argument against the Polish newspaper Gazeta reminds me of the Texas Board of Education. Same reasons for whitewashing history.

    He accused Gazeta of using the “pedagogics of shame”, by which he meant the destruction of Polish national pride, by reminding Poles about the less illustrious moments of our history such as the role of Polish collaborators in the Holocaust.

    As for the reduction in tourist travel to Dresden, if it is about the money maybe the right-wingers will change their tune.

  337. says

    One thing I notice about the Sanders and Clinton campaigns is that both want to improve healthcare in the USA, while all the Republicans will devastate the healthcare plan we already have, (except for Trump who will wave a wand and give us the most beautiful healthcare in the world, at lower costs, and after throwing Obamacare in the trash).

    Hillary Clinton’s campaign has mentioned the “public option” before, but in a low-key way. I am glad to see them come back to it, glad to see the highlight on this issue.

    Some background on the “public option” from Steve Benen:

    During the fight to pass health care reform in 2009 and 2010, one of the most notable aspects of President Obama’s plan was something known as the “public option.” The idea, which was quite popular, was to create a public, non-profit health insurer that would compete with private insurance companies for consumers’ business […]

    The policy was poised to be part of the Affordable Care Act, but it was ultimately killed by one man, then-Sen. Joe Lieberman, who vowed to join a Republican filibuster and destroy the entire reform effort if the public option was included in the final package. Left with no choice, reform advocates relented.

    But the measure’s demise six years ago need not be permanent. […]
    Clinton’s campaign has updated its website to note her continued support for the government-run health plan that was dropped from Obamacare during the law’s drafting. […]

    A new version of Clinton’s campaign website suggests she won’t try to push the public option through Congress, but instead will work with governors using existing flexibility under Obamacare “to empower states to establish a public option choice.” […]

    Brian Beutler of The New Republic made the case for public option in January.
    https://newrepublic.com/article/127573/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-can-unite-health-care

  338. says

    To me, the sudden flow of money and supporters to Marco Rubio looks like rats jumping on a sinking ship. The man sinking that ship is Donald Trump.

    […] Since Saturday — the day Rubio lost the South Carolina primary by double digits — he’s received endorsements from five senators, a governor, and 11 House members. This doesn’t include backing from former elected officials, party elites, and GOP mega-donors, many which are also scurrying to line up behind the Floridian. […]

    This bears repeating: Rubio lost in South Carolina. He lost by double digits. Everybody panic.

    Check out the FiveThirtyEight chart to see the clear trend in endorsements:
    http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/

  339. blf says

    Sorry, I just realized that in @370 I paraphrased some comments I attributed to a “Mr Wyborcza”. The paper’s name is Gazeta Wyborcza. I meant the author of the excerpted article, Mr Leszczyński.

  340. says

    John Kasich’s campaign has another billionaire backer, hedge fund rich guy, Julian H. Robertson Jr. of Tiger Management.

    Katich finished fifth in South Carolina. It looks to me like he will do well in Ohio, but be stomped by Trump and Rubio elsewhere.

  341. blf says

    Teh crud manages to make himself even worse, Ted Cruz ad aligns him with anti federal land control cause defended by Bundys:

    While Cruz has not publicly endorsed the Oregon militia standoff, his pledge to ‘return full control of Nevada’s lands to its rightful owners’ strikes a similar chord

    Ted Cruz’s campaign backers are aligning the Republican presidential candidate with political cause of Nevada’s infamous and recently-jailed rancher Cliven Bundy, harnessing the same anti-government fervor that fueled an armed standoff in neighboring Oregon.

    Ahead of Tuesday’s Republican caucuses in Nevada, Cruz has released a new ad promising to fight back against federal control of public lands — a move that addresses the central grievance of Cliven and his sons, Ammon and Ryan Bundy, who led the armed takeover of a national wildlife refuge in Oregon last month.

    The Grauniad isn’t quite correct here. Whilst the fruitcakes have indeed claimed a core issue is ownership of federal lands (with large doses of racism, gun-nuttery, “sovereign citizenship”, and a basket of oranges every morning), it mostly just me! me! me!

    [… discusses some of teh crud’s campaign’s links with the fruitcakes …]

    The most direct link between Cruz and the Bundys is Nevada assemblywoman Michele Fiore, who is a member of Cruz’s leadership team in the key swing state and the most outspoken elected official defending the armed militia in Oregon.

    Ted Cruz is the only candidate talking about giving lands back to the state where they belong, said Fiore […]. This is a very, very, very important issue to him.

    […]

    Sitting in a jail cell in Portland hundreds of miles away from the frenzy of campaigns that landed in Nevada this week, Ammon Bundy said he is hoping the presidential candidates respond to his message.

    I have heard several candidates talk about the constitution and its importance, [he] said in a recent phone call from jail that his lawyer recorded for the Guardian. I would like to hear them be very simple in understanding that the land belongs to the people{…} and that the constitution does not allow the federal government to own or control land inside the state.

    Ammon Bundy […] said he wanted a president who will acknowledge that the federal government’s overreach has caused destruction in this nation.

    […]

    Fiore — who described the Bundys and other arrested Oregon occupiers as nonviolent cowboys and political prisoners — argued that Cruz is the only true conservative candidate who will take the kind of aggressive action on land-use policy that Ammon Bundy is seeking. The BLM has been nothing more than a bureaucracy of terrorism, she added.

    […]

    Cliven’s wife, Carol Bundy, said she […] was not confident any candidate would make a serious effort to get the federal government out of Nevada. Nobody wants to take a stand on this, and I think that’s sad, she said.

    I’ve redacted a long discussion of support from some Nevada state politicianscrooks.

    There aren’t very many comments yet. Some of the better readers’s comments:

    ● “Ted Cruz proves again and again that he is the dangerous candidate in the whole bunch.”
    In reply: “Ted Cruz is dangerous like Goldfinger in the movie, Trump more like Donald Duck, which doesn’t mean that the outcome under Cruz would be worse than under Trump.”

    ● “Cruz definitely has the entitled white freeloader vote — that’s for sure!”

  342. says

    The Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau continues to set a good example. He says he will march in Toronto’s Pride Parade on July 3.

    Donald Trump continues to set a bad example. In reference to a protestor at a rally last night, Trump said:

    “I’d like to punch him in the face,” Trump said, remarking that a man disrupting his rally was escorted out with a smile on his face. “He’s smiling, having a good time.” […]

    Trump claimed the protester was “nasty as hell” and accused the man of trying to punch the security officers forcing him out of the rally, though the man did not appear to be fighting off those officers.

    “In the old days,” Trump added, protesters would be “carried out on stretchers.”

    “We’re not allowed to push back anymore,” Trump said.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/23/politics/donald-trump-nevada-rally-punch/index.html

  343. tomh says

    @ #377
    Along these lines, this week the House is considering the SPORTSMEN’S HERITAGE AND RECREATIONAL ENHANCEMENT (“SHARE”) ACT.

    “H.R. 2406 would amend existing laws and establish new laws related to the management of federal lands. It would authorize the sale of certain federal land and permit the receipts from those sales to be spent.”

    Included in the ways the money would be spent; “exempting components of firearms and ammunition and sport fishing equipment from regulations of chemical substances under the Toxic Substances Control Act” (this has to do with lead bullets); “increasing the proportion of funding that states may use for acquiring land for public target ranges”; ” Prohibits the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from banning firearms possession in public areas of a water resources development project.”; “Revises standards for determining a “baited area” for purposes of the prohibition on taking migratory game birds.”

    And, in a bill supposedly designed to enhance sport hunting in the US, it prevents the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from adopting a rule to restrict the illegal ivory trade in the United States. There are other provisions, (trapping is redefined as hunting), that have led the Humane Society to label it the “poaching” bill. For all this, we should sell off millions of acres of public land.

    For anyone who thinks there is little difference between the parties, I am certain that this bill would be signed by any Republican president, and vetoed by any/i> Democratic president.

  344. says

    Republican senators have decided to double down on their obstructionism when it comes to replacing Justice Scalia. In doing so, they are still calling President Obama a “lame duck president,” which is a term that usually only applies when a new president has been elected but not yet sworn in … not a term used for the current president’s entire last year in office.

    Key Republican senators on the Judiciary Committee emerged from a closed door meeting in Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office Tuesday united in their determination not to consider any nominee to replace Antonin Scalia until the next president takes office. […]

    “We believe the American people need to decide who is going to make this appointment rather than a lame duck president,” said Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-TN).

    When asked if they would start the process after the new president took office or if they would consider doing it in the lame duck session, Cornyn replied “No, after the next president is selected. That way the American people have a voice in the process.” […]

    Meanwhile, Judiciary Committee Chair Charles Grassley (R-IA) and the rest of the committee Republicans sent a letter to McConnell outlining their plan to block any Obama nominee for Scalia’s seat.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said that “there’s no use starting a process that’s not going to go anywhere and we are going to let the next president decide,” when asked why there would be no hearings.

    Talking Points Memo link.

  345. dianne says

    if it is about the money maybe the right-wingers will change their tune.

    That’s the thing, at least in the US they DON’T. Obamacare is unquestionably saving the states that took the Medicaid expansion money. It’s even saving a little money for the other states. But the Republicans still want to repeal it. They are not in any way fiscal conservatives any more.

  346. says

    Okay, yeah, obstructionism and disrespect. We get it Senator Pat Roberts:

    After President Obama on Tuesday morning revealed his plan to close the Guantanamo Bay prison, Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) threw it right in the trash.

    A video uploaded to Twitter shows Roberts holding Obama’s proposal to close the prison used to detain terrorists.

    “This is what I think of the President’s plan to send terrorists to the United States,” Roberts says in the video before crumpling the plan into a ball and throwing it into a wastebasket.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/pat-roberts-guantanamo-trash

    Smug and all, aren’t you.

  347. blf says

    Something of a follow-up to @374 on teh robot, Marco Rubio: the winningest candidate who just can’t seem to win:

    For a candidate who exudes confidence in his likelihood of winning the Republican nomination, he has a solid lock on losing for the foreseeable future

    By most measures, Marco Rubio should be running away with the race for the Republican nomination in Nevada.

    Of all the Republicans left in the contest, the senator from Florida has a unique connection to Nevada’s culture and voters.

    He lived in Las Vegas […], embraced the Mormon faith [(later converting to Catholicism), and is bilingual …].

    When he showed up to campaign at the downbeat Texas Station casino in north Las Vegas on Monday, there were more than two dozen of his family members in the audience.

    Whatever Rubio knows about Nevada, it isn’t impressing the state’s voters. According to the most recent polls […], Rubio is at least 20 points behind Donald Trump and can barely tie Ted Cruz for second place.

    In fact, Rubio is faring no worse in this state than he is elsewhere. He is running third in two of the bigger states on Super Tuesday [Texas and Georgia …].

    For a candidate who exudes confidence in his likelihood of winning the nomination, Rubio has a solid lock on losing for the foreseeable future.

    His own state of Florida does not vote for another three weeks, and even there he is trailing in third place in recent polls. He is the winningest candidate who just can’t win.

    There is a consistency to Rubio’s underperformance that matches his robotic delivery on stage. […]

    So how come Rubio is faring so poorly in a state he once called home?

    […]

    [… H]is ideas are so vacuous he makes Trump’s stump speech sound like a seminar at the Brookings Institution. […]

    Ouch! That’s gotta hurt.

    Rubio is an old man’s idea of young man: a fresh copy of an old Norman Rockwell. He is neither youthful and forward-looking, nor old and backward-looking. In other words, a perfectly good second-best.

    Some readers’s comments (it’s basically pile on teh robot time, I don’t recall seeing a single comment which was pro-robot):

    ● “Rubio is made of plastic. He is made up of pieces of vested interest pieces stuck together with cheap glue that cracks when light is shone on him.”

    ● “The mark of Rubio’s candidacy is his sincerity about zealously professing Mormonism (in Nevada), Catholicism (in Catholic states) and Evangelicalism (everywhere else) simultaneously. He is all things to all people (and nothing to any of them.) Deep down, he’s shallow.” [I have no idea if teh robot does this or not, but it sounds plausible… –blf]

    ● “[…] Rubio is a completely empty suit, a less-than-one trick pony. […]”

    ● “Marco Rubio: the winningest candidate who just can’t seem to win — What has Rubio ever won besides the support of dipshit donors?

    ● “he lacks a raison d’être — wanting to live in the White House because Cuba isn’t a raison d’être”.

    ● “Rubio is a soulless, plutocat-fellating, right-wing talking-point wind-up doll, and, as such, a truly contemptible sub-human.
      “But I don’t have such kind words for Ted Cruz.”

    ● “As an Latino in Miami who knows the truth behind the Rubio farse, he doesn’t deserve to win, even at marbles as they say in Spanish.It’s a shame that the two Latinos in the race are as repellent as maggots in a dead corpse. Hopefully, Latino’s will not vote on the merits of race, but on the issues that demand substance, tolerance, solvency and justice.”

    ● “Rubio has a secret weapon the Donald doesn’t. Because he is so Robotic, and his personality is so paper thin, he can photocopy himself and campaign in multiple states at once.”

    ● “The puppet with sawdust in his head.”

    ● “He’s a joke candidate, a 2D cardboard cutout sprung from the pages of a badly written satire.”

    ● “To borrow from the immortal bard, Rubio is but ‘a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage. And then is heard no more’. As for his speeches, they are ‘a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing’.”

  348. says

    An insurance agency in Georgia is requiring all of its employees to carry guns at work.
    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/lance-toland-employee-gun-mandate

    Lance Toland told WSB [local TV station] that his employees were able to get the permits and guns within four weeks. […]

    Toland said the office’s gun of choice, nicknamed “The Judge,” is “a 5-shot .410, just like a shotgun.” […]

    “Everybody has one of these in their drawer or on their person. I would not want to come into one of my facilities,” Toland said, holding up the gun.

    In 2014, Georgia passed legislation that allows residents to carry firearms into nightclubs, bars, certain government buildings and classrooms. Police are also barred under the law from asking to see documentation for the permits.

    “Most of my employees are women,” Toland noted. He decided on his mandate after he heard about violent crime in Atlanta and recent home invasions. […]

  349. says

    blf @383, I will give one plaudit to Marco Rubio: he has inspired a lot of creativity when it comes to describing him.

    In other news, a former employee has hit the nail on the head when it comes to identifying a cause for the disastrous policies of Michigan Governor Rick Snyder:

    Dennis Schornack, who served as a senior advisor on transportation in Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder’s (R) administration for three years, blamed the widespread water contamination that has led to lead poisoning and possibly a Legionnaire’s outbreak on Snyder’s penchant for running government like a business.[…]

    Yes! That is such a Republican/conservative trait. Not every public service or office can be run like a business. (Donald Trump is wrong.)

    “Government is not a business…and it cannot be run like one,” Schornack told the Detroit Free Press. “The people of Flint got stuck on the losing end of decisions driven by spreadsheets instead of water quality and public health. […]”

    Snyder came to office in 2011 […] His administration focused on a private sector approach to government that has elicited criticism, particularly for appointing people with private sector experience as un-elected emergency managers of both Detroit and Flint.

    I snipped details of some of the stupid stuff that Snyder’s venture capital and lawyer friends did when he placed them in positions of power.

    […] Snyder has also overseen the privatization of a number of government functions, including public schools, services for veterans, and prison food. He was also criticized for including a proposal in his most recent budget to move state mental health funds into private entities. […]

    Think Progress link.

  350. says

    Ben Carson said something stupid:

    […] In a new POLITICO podcast, Carson says President Obama was “raised white” because “many of his formative years were spent in Indonesia.”

    “I mean, like most Americans, I was proud that we broke the color barrier when he was elected, but… he didn’t grow up like I grew up,” Carson adds. “So, for him to, you know, claim that, you know, he identifies with the experience of black Americans, I think, is a bit of a stretch.”

  351. says

    Well, this is a stupid move. Lawmakers in Brazil are making it harder for women to get abortions, and this is in the face of the spread of the Zika virus.

    Despite urgent demands from global leaders to loosen abortion penalties in Latin American in light of the Zika virus — a mosquito-borne disease that can cause serious birth defects if pregnant women are infected — Brazil lawmakers are moving in the opposite direction.

    Instead, conservatives in Brazil are working to increase penalties for women who’ve had an abortion. The deeply-Catholic government is drafting legislation that would sentence women to nearly five years in jail if they abort a fetus with microcephaly — the brain disorder that is directly linked to Zika.

    In Brazil, where doctors have seen 4,000 cases of babies born with microcephaly in the past four months, abortion is already illegal — aside from rare cases of rape […] or when the mother’s life is in danger. Currently, if a woman is found to have had an abortion, she is sentenced to no more than three years in prison. But under this new legislation, if a court found the case to be based on microcephaly, a woman can spend up to four-and-a-half years behind bars. And for doctors that administer the abortion? They could face a 15 year sentence.

    Those backing this bill say that the Zika virus has unfairly loosened the country’s acceptance of abortion, and feminist groups are to blame. […]

    Think Progress link.

    Those damned feminists! /sarcasm

  352. blf says

    I have to admit I don’t know what the underlying story is about (other than the “Nauru” mentioned refers to a concentration camp for asylum seekers run(? under contract with a private firm?) by Ozland on one of Nauru’s islands), but First Dog on the Moon seems to have nailed it again, Brenda the Civil Disobedience Penguin on Baby Asha: this is the Australia we love! (cartoon): “Despite the pressure from government bullies and Serco’s hired thugs, the doctors at Lady Cilento hospital have held firm and behaved like— well, doctors. Job well done, Australia”.

    Here is a recent BBC report, Australia asylum baby ‘will be sent back to Nauru’:

    A baby at the heart of an asylum row in Australia will be sent with her mother to an offshore camp on the Pacific island of Nauru, the government says.

    Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said the girl had been discharged from hospital into community detention.

    But he stressed she would be able to stay in Australia only temporarily.

    Doctors had refused to discharge the one-year-old, who was being treated for serious burns, unless she was provided a “suitable home environment”.

    The standoff sparked protests outside Brisbane’s Lady Cilento Hospital in support of the doctors.

    The girl known as Asha, who is Nepalese, will now stay with her family, including her mother, in community detention in Brisbane. […]

    Mr Dutton said she would be sent to the offshore processing centre on Nauru once her medical treatment was complete […].

    “We are not going to allow people smugglers to get out a message that if you seek assistance in an Australian hospital, that somehow that is your formula to becoming an Australian citizen,” he told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.

    “I couldn’t be any clearer — once the medical assistance has been provided and the legal issues resolved, people will go back to Nauru.”

    It’s not known if the minister had on his toothbrush mustache and brownshirt at the time of his pronouncement.

  353. says

    David Horowitz, conservative pundit, friend of Trump, and general dunderhead, says that Democrats are racist.

    I mean, it’s just unbelievable to me when you see how racist the Democratic Party is. Everything is about race and everything is an attack on white people and anybody who’s not black or Latino.

    Right Wing Watch link.

  354. says

    Mitch McConnell and other Republicans are claiming that Joe Biden called for rejecting all Supreme Court nominees during election years. To make the claim, they are showing deceptively-edited video from 1992.

    […] Today, the pro-obstruction crowd thought it got a boost when a short clip of now-Vice President Joe Biden was unearthed from the depths of the C-SPAN archives. In the clip of the 1992 floor speech, Biden, who was then chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee during what turned out to be the last year of George H.W. Bush’s presidency, urges the president to, in the event of a Supreme Court vacancy, “not name a nominee until after the November election is completed.” […]

    […] when taken in context, that wasn’t Biden’s point. The then-senator made the remarks in the context of a long speech bemoaning the increased politicization of the confirmation process and, in Biden’s words, urging the White House and the Senate to “work together to overcome partisan differences to ensure the Court functions as the Founding Fathers intended.” […]

    Look at the timestamp on the video. Biden was speaking on June 25, 1992 about filling a vacancy if a justice “resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks resigns at the end of the summer.” […] That’s a very different point in an election year than we are in today, when the vacancy opened so very early on in the presidential nominating contests and with the risk of a Supreme Court seat remaining open for more than a year, severely disrupting two consecutive terms.

    If you go back to read the transcript of Biden’s remarks, he repeatedly states that he is concerned about vacancies that occur “in the summer or fall of a presidential election year” […]

    And, as Volsky notes, while Biden didn’t face a Supreme Court vacancy in 1992, his Judiciary Committee did continue approving Circuit Court nominees well through the summer and fall of the election year, a stark contrast to current Republican threats to shut down the judicial nominations process entirely this year: […]

    Link

    I have seen the false claim about Biden on every rightwing media outlet. Widest and fastest distribution of pseudo-facts in some time.

  355. blf says

    Those backing this [Brazilian] bill say that the Zika virus has unfairly loosened the country’s acceptance of abortion, and feminist groups are to blame.

    Feminists are common mosquitoes?
    Hum… well, it could explain why it’s so easy to catch cooties, and — worse! — why its so hard to git rid of the annoying pests… </snark>

  356. says

    A Ted Cruz supporter has threatened to “eunuch” himself. That’s how sad he is over the third place finish of Cruz in South Carolina.

    [Steve] Deace, who was part of Cruz’s Iowa leadership team and has given his advice and name in support of the senator, has gone on a tirade against Cruz on social media, his nationally syndicated radio show, and in two parts on Conservative Review. He has denounced Cruz’s current messaging and stance against Trump as weak, despite explaining that he is still a “Cruz guy.”

    […] Deace criticized Cruz’s performance in South Carolina, saying, “Third place is third place. There is no excuse for Ted Cruz to finish in third place in South Carolina. … I love him, we are friends, but I don’t believe in victims.”

    Deace said the voters in South Carolina were responding to Cruz’s reluctance to fight with Trump and his apologies to Rubio and Carson: They are “sending Cruz a message, and I think that message is that they want him to go back to being that alpha male conservative leader that people fell in love with.” […]

    “If anyone with the Cruz campaign ever apologizes to Ben Carson again, I may eunuch myself, which will make my wife very, very upset. I am desperate at this point. I will do anything, name it, name the price. As a Cruz guy, I will do anything the universe demands, that they never apologize to Ben Carson or really anybody else again. […]”

    Media Matters link.

  357. blf says

    A Ted Cruz supporter has threatened to “eunuch” himself.

    I sense a new variation on the Darwin Award.

  358. Nick Gotts says

    In Utah control of money mixes with the mormon religion to create an “unelected governor” in Zions Bank President and CEO Scott Anderson. – Lynna, OM @360</blockquote/.

    Just occasionally, it stkies me once again when reading one of your Mormon posts, how utterly bizarre it is that this corrupt and ridiculous cult effectively runs one of the 50 states as an autonomous fief.

  359. Nick Gotts says

    Hmm, thorougholy screwed that up. Apologies, here it is again:

    In Utah control of money mixes with the mormon religion to create an “unelected governor” in Zions Bank President and CEO Scott Anderson. – Lynna, OM @360

    Just occasionally, it strikes me once again when reading one of your Mormon posts, how utterly bizarre it is that this corrupt and ridiculous cult effectively runs one of the 50 states as an autonomous fief.

  360. says

    Nick @397, Yes, that’s the situation.

    Polygamous church leaders were recently arrested for food stamp fraud in Utah, but my feeling is that fraud that “bleeds the beast” (bleeds the federal government) is largely ignored by most mormons. It’s a way of life.

    […] federal prosecutors on Tuesday announced indictments against leaders and members of the polygamous Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints on charges related to food stamp fraud.

    Lyle Jeffs, who has been running the FLDS for his imprisoned brother, is one of nearly a dozen people named in an indictment […]

    Also indicted was Seth Jeffs, brother to both Lyle and FLDS President Warren Jeffs, the religion’s president and prophet — and who is serving a sentence of up to life in prison plus 20 years in Texas for crimes related to marrying and sexually abusing underage girls.

    “If they’re finally going to prosecute Lyle and the leaders of the church, it will eventually bring the church down,” said Wallace Jeffs, Warren Jeffs’ half-brother, who was expelled from the church. “This pretty much cuts the head off the snake.” […]

    Each of the 11 people indicted face one count of conspiring to defraud the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and one charge of conspiracy to commit money laundering.

    Prosecutors say church leaders ordered members to use their SNAP benefits to buy food and then give it to the FLDS Storehouse, a communal clearinghouse that collects and distributes commodities to the community. The leaders tell church members that they must obtain their food and household goods solely through the storehouse, the indictment alleges. […]

    Salt Lake Tribune link

    Mormon leaders don’t just perpetrate frauds on outsiders, they also defraud their own church members.

  361. says

    Condemning the obstructionists in the senate:

    Sen. Harry Reid on Tuesday warned that Sen. Chuck Grassley will go down as the ‘most obstructionist’ Senate Judiciary Committee chairman in history for denying a hearing to a Supreme Court nominee from President Obama. The Democratic leader said Grassley (R-Iowa) would eclipse chairmen of the panel during the 1960s who blocked civil rights legislation. […]

    The Hill link

  362. says

    Apparently, there’s a doctor assigned to the Supreme Court. Who knew?

    That doctor has issued a statement that summarizes Justice Scalia’s health problems:

    Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes, among other ailments that probably contributed to the justice’s sudden death, according to a letter from the Supreme Court’s doctor.

    Presidio County District Attorney Rod Ponton cited the letter Tuesday when he told The Associated Press there was nothing suspicious about the Feb. 13 death of the 79-year-old jurist. He said the long list of health problems made an autopsy unnecessary.

    Ponton had a copy of a letter from Rear Adm. Brian P. Monahan, the attending physician for members of Congress and the Supreme Court. […]

    In the letter, Monahan listed more than a half-dozen ailments, including sleep apnea, degenerative joint disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and high blood pressure. Scalia also was a smoker, the letter said. […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/scalia-health-problems-scotus-doctor

  363. blf says

    Something of a follow-up to @398, Leaders of Utah polygamous sect arrested and accused of fraud:

    Leaders of Warren Jeffs’ polygamous sect are accused of food-stamp fraud and money laundering, marking one of the biggest crackdowns on the group in years

    [… P]rosecutors accused church leaders of orchestrating a yearslong fraud scheme instructing members how to use food-stamp benefits illegally for the benefit of the faith and avoid getting caught […]

    One common tactic was buying groceries with the food stamps and giving the supplies to the church’s communal storehouse for leaders to choose how to divvy up. Other times, members would give their cards to others who weren’t supposed to use them, prosecutors said.

    They also would swipe the cards at church-run stores without walking away with foods or goods, leaving the money to the store owners. Some of those funds were then used to pay thousands for a tractor and a truck […]

    […]

    The arrests come amid a civil rights trial in Phoenix against the twin polygamous communities of Hildale and Colorado City, Arizona, in which prosecutors say the communities discriminated against people who were not members of the church by denying them housing, water services and police protection.

    Federal labor lawyers also are going after the group on allegations that leaders ordered parents to put their kids to work for long hours for little pay on a southern Utah pecan farm.

    […]

    Prosecutors said the actions in this new case weren’t coordinated. But private investigator Sam Brower, who has spent years investigating the group, said authorities seemed to have gotten help from large numbers of people who have been kicked out or left, amid a series of increasingly bizarre orders from Jeffs and leaders loyal to him.

    “This is huge blow,” Brower said. “Combined with everything else, it’s incredible.”

    The indictment doesn’t provide a total dollar figure for the amount of food-stamp fraud allegedly committed, but prosecutors said a large percentage of people in the group receive food-stamp benefits amounting to millions of dollars each year.

    [Amos] Guiora [a University of Utah law professor who has studied the church] said group members refer to the practice as “bleeding the beast,” taking money from a government they disdain and using as they see fit.

    In addition to fraud, discrimination, and child slavery there is also the phenomenon known as “lost boys“:

    “Lost boys” is a term used for young men who have been excommunicated or pressured to leave polygamous Mormon fundamentalism groups […] They are pressured to leave by adult men to reduce competition for wives within such sects, usually when they are between the ages of 13 and 21.

    [… M]en are each expected to marry at least three wives. Since birth rates for boys and girls are roughly equal, and women do not enter the community in large numbers, there are not enough women for all men to do this.

    While some boys leave by their own choice, many are ostensibly banished for conduct such as watching a movie, watching television, playing football, or talking to a girl. […]

    Boys in these sects are commonly raised not to trust the outside world, and may be taught that leaving their communities is a sin worse than murder. These boys are usually left with little education or skills applicable to life outside of their community of birth, and must learn to live in a society about which they know little, while dealing with the consequences of being shunned by their families, and believing they are beyond spiritual redemption.

    Teh Pantastic Planet of Penis Power!™

  364. says

    blf 241: regarding the “lost boys,” boys are sometimes transported to other polygamous colonies (in Canada, for example) and forced to work in the lumber industry.

    In the polygamist colonies on the Utah/Arizona border, boys start working at about the age of 14 in the construction industry. There have also been some cases of boys from polygamist families forced to work in businesses in southern Idaho.

  365. says

    Republicans in the Senate continue to demonstrate disrespect for President Obama:

    A White House invitation for U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley to discuss the current U.S. Supreme Current vacancy with President Barack Obama has so far gone unanswered.

    Turning down the meeting would represent a break in protocol from two previous high court vacancies during Obama’s presidency, when the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee as well as the Senate majority and minority leaders attended Oval Office meetings.

    Des Moines Register link.

  366. says

    Trump won in Nevada. There are still a few caucus ballots to count, but most of the Nevada results are in. Trump wins with a 22-point lead over Rubio, who came in second.

    Trump 45.9%
    Rubio 23.9%
    Cruz 21.4%
    Kasich, somewhere in the single digits

  367. says

    What Bernie Sanders had to say about the obstructionism from the U.S. Senate:

    “What you are seeing today in this Supreme Court situation is nothing more than the continuous and unprecedented obstructionism that President Obama has gone through” at the hands of Republicans, the Vermont senator said.

    “This is on top of the birther issue, which we heard from Donald Trump and others, a racist effort to try to delegitimize the president of the United States,” Sanders continued.

    https://www.yahoo.com/politics/sanders-calls-senate-obstruction-a-racist-effort-024556291.html

  368. says

    President Obama wrote an essay about his responsibility to appoint a judge to the Supreme Court, and about the qualities he looks for in selecting a nominee. The essay/blog was published on SCOTUSblog.

    Here are some excerpts:

    A Responsibility I Take Seriously

    The Constitution vests in the President the power to appoint judges to the Supreme Court. It’s a duty that I take seriously, and one that I will fulfill in the weeks ahead.

    […] It’s a decision to which I devote considerable time […]

    First and foremost, the person I appoint will be eminently qualified. He or she will have an independent mind, rigorous intellect, impeccable credentials, and a record of excellence and integrity. I’m looking for a mastery of the law, with an ability to hone in on the key issues before the Court, and provide clear answers to complex legal questions.

    […] I seek judges who approach decisions without any particular ideology or agenda, but rather a commitment to impartial justice, a respect for precedent, and a determination to faithfully apply the law to the facts at hand.

    But I’m also mindful that there will be cases that reach the Supreme Court in which the law is not clear. There will be cases in which a judge’s analysis necessarily will be shaped by his or her own perspective, ethics, and judgment. That’s why the third quality I seek in a judge is a keen understanding that justice is not about abstract legal theory, nor some footnote in a dusty casebook. It’s the kind of life experience earned outside the classroom and the courtroom; experience that suggests he or she views the law not only as an intellectual exercise, but also grasps the way it affects the daily reality of people’s lives in a big, complicated democracy, and in rapidly changing times. That, I believe, is an essential element for arriving at just decisions and fair outcomes.

    A sterling record. A deep respect for the judiciary’s role. An understanding of the way the world really works. […] And as Senators prepare to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to consider the person I appoint, I hope they’ll move quickly to debate and then confirm this nominee so that the Court can continue to serve the American people at full strength.

  369. blf says

    Lynna@402, Interesting, I’ve never(?) heard of “lost boys” being transported to “the colonies” as slave labour. (As an aside, some quick searches have not been able to confirm this happens — do you have a source / reference at-hand?) I was under the general impression they were usually just kicked out of their homes / hometowns, frequently on trumped-up “delinquency” charges — making me wonder (mostly tongue-in-cheek) if places like Hildale (Utah) and Colorado City (Arizona) are the leaders in “teenage male delinquency”…

    Which means the nearby towns of Hurricane and St George (both in Utah) really do have a problem, with the “lost boys” who wind up there frequently committing petty (and some not-so-petty) crimes, and to some extent being treated as outcasts. There are a number of individuals and organizations which try to help, but my impression is they are overloaded, sometimes intimidated, and perhaps not supported by the local authorities or the LDS cult. (As it so happens, I know some individuals in the Hurricane / St George area, and none of them has ever mentioned the issue at all (but I also haven’t asked); none belong to the cult and all loathe the cult.)

  370. blf says

    Steven W Thrasher (from his quick bio: “[a] writer-at-large for Guardian US. He was named Journalist of the Year 2012 by the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association”) has a provocative but interesting opinion article in the Grauniad, Black thinkers like Bernie Sanders. They’ve studied the Clintons’ true cost:

    Spike Lee endorsed the Vermont senator on Tuesday. He is the latest in a series of black intellectual heavy-weights to have come out in support of him

    Spike Lee is the latest black public intellectual to endorse Bernie Sanders and to question the sanity of black voters and politicians pledging their allegiance to the Clintons, who have done as much harm to black America as any living political couple. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I am mystified by robust black support for Bill and Hillary Clinton.

    […]

    Bill Clinton governed through playing to white fears by hurting, locking up or even executing black Americans. He left the campaign trail in 1992 to oversee the execution of Ricky Ray Rector, a black man so mentally incapacitated, he reportedly did not eat the dessert from his final meal because he was “saving it for later”. When in office, Bill Clinton ended welfare for poor children and destroyed countless black families through a crime bill even he now admits made mass incarceration worse, while Hillary Clinton would go out and whip up support for this accelerated disenfranchisement and marginalization of black America, even when it meant referring to children as “superpredators”.

    […]

    No one speaks for “the black community” or the mythical “black voter”. But the Black Lives Matter movement has upped the level of discourse and critique in racial politics. So, it’s fantastic to see such serious black minds from American film, letters and academia making their cases in public with insight and heft. And, given their decades of deep intellectual work on race (along with Sanders’ commitment to universal public college tuition and healthcare and his aversion to Wall Street and private prisons), their cases for Sanders are sound.

    […]

    To me, Sanders is not only appealing because he marched with Martin Luther King Jr or was arrested fighting racism (though I like the idea of a president who has been arrested for social justice). Sanders is most interesting because he offers black Americans a real possibility for change, thanks to his willingness to genuinely critique capitalism. You don’t get to take millions in speaking fees over the years as Hillary Clinton has done — much of it from banks — and get to critique capitalism.

    […]

    Mr Thrasher also takes a good swipe at Secetrary Clinton’s endorsement by “the corporate-funded Super Pac of the Congressional Black Caucus (not by the CBC itself or by its members)”: “[T]he only reason seemed to be political expediency. The black members of congress seemed intent on maintaining their relationship within the Clinton power structure, no matter how deeply invested it may be in white supremacy.” The dubious-seeming CBC Super Pac endorsement has been discussed previously in this thread.

  371. says

    The turnout of Republican voters in Nevada set a record. Once again, Republican turnout is seen to go up, while Democratic turnout has been trending downward. This is the fourth Republican primary or caucus in which the turnout has set records.

    I’ll add one note of caution here: Trump and rightwing media are reporting that he won the Latino vote in Nevada. Yes, he got more Latino votes than his fellow Republicans, but very few Latino’s attended the Republican caucus. The numbers are meaningless if you look at the overall picture. About 75,000 Republicans caucused in Nevada, and about 9% of those were Latino. Some reports say 8%. About 30% of the state’s population is Latino. There are about 430,000 registered Republicans in Nevada, so the turnout may look low to us, but it is still a big jump from the 33,000 in 2012.

    Trump’s spin on this: “You know what I really am happy about? Forty-six percent with the Hispanics. Forty-six percent! No. 1 with Hispanics. I’m really happy about that.”

  372. says

    The U.S. House of Representatives is infected by a group of Republicans who call themselves the Freedom Caucus. This group also has a “board” … okay, don’t know why you need a board, but it does provide a smaller group of concentrated dunderheadedness to which Senator Mitch McConnell can pander.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told a group of staunch House conservatives there isn’t “a snowball’s chance in hell” that he will back down from his opposition to confirming a Supreme Court justice before a new president is elected.

    “There’s not a snowball’s chance in hell that’s gonna happen,” McConnell said, according to lawmakers in the meeting.

    Idaho Rep. Raúl Labrador said the meeting underscored “the importance of having a Republican Senate.”

    Politico link

  373. tomh says

    @ #412
    It also underscores the importance of having a Democratic president, any Democrat, with a ready veto pen.

  374. says

    blf @409, those mormon doofuses also ship young girls back and forth between polygamist colonies: Link

    […] She alleges that last May, as part of the prenuptial arrangements, her daughter, Nichole, was taken without her parents’ consent across the border to Bountiful “for lewd purposes,” a charge being investigated by the RCMP in Creston. Ms. Holm has filed the same complaint with the police in Colorado City, Ariz. […]

    http://culteducation.com/group/1099-polygamist-groups/16830-bountifuls-troubling-tradition.html

    Lost boys connected to both Canadian and Utah polygamist colonies:
    http://www.filmwest.com/Catalogue/itemdetail/3330/

    Mormon polygamists using children in dangerous jobs:
    http://www.childbrides.org/canada_VS_children_around_dangerous_work_have_tragedies.html

    Boys from the Kingston polygamist clan:
    http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/inside-the-order-one-mormon-cults-secret-empire-20110615

    […] Boys work its coal mine and stack boxes at Standard Restaurant Supply, a massive discount store. They are paid not in cash but in scrip, an arcane form of credit used by the Mormon pioneers that can only be redeemed at company stores. […]

    Boys working for Winton Blackmore in Canada:

    […] How many boys were in the crew housing with you?

    Frank: a couple of hundred guys. Lots of my friends left to go to work because it was a better option. We made fence posts…they fed us and we could stay in the crew houses. (Frank pauses and looks at Truman.)

    Truman: We worked 40 hours a week, and got paid $100 every two weeks.

    What? You left school as minors to work full time as labourers, for a reputable Canadian business, and got paid $1.25 an hour?

    Frank: Well, actually until you were 18 you got paid $60 every two weeks. So I would have been working full time for four years by then.

    Truman: When I was about 19 they decided to start paying us $300 every two weeks, but we were supposed to start buying our own vehicles with that.

    It sounds suspiciously like child labour. […]

    Link.

    The lost boys of Colorado City: Link

    Mormon boys sent from Utah to Idaho for “repentance”: Link

    I have more references, and will post those later.

  375. says

    blf, it looks like my previous reply included too many links. The comment ended up in moderation.

    I will try again, splitting the comment into parts so there are fewer links per comment.

    blf @409, those mormon doofuses also ship young girls back and forth between polygamist colonies: Link

    […] She alleges that last May, as part of the prenuptial arrangements, her daughter, Nichole, was taken without her parents’ consent across the border to Bountiful “for lewd purposes,” a charge being investigated by the RCMP in Creston. Ms. Holm has filed the same complaint with the police in Colorado City, Ariz. […]

    http://culteducation.com/group/1099-polygamist-groups/16830-bountifuls-troubling-tradition.html

    Mormon polygamists using children in dangerous jobs:
    http://www.childbrides.org/canada_VS_children_around_dangerous_work_have_tragedies.html

    Boys working for Winton Blackmore in Canada:

    […] How many boys were in the crew housing with you?

    Frank: a couple of hundred guys. Lots of my friends left to go to work because it was a better option. We made fence posts…they fed us and we could stay in the crew houses. (Frank pauses and looks at Truman.)

    Truman: We worked 40 hours a week, and got paid $100 every two weeks.

    What? You left school as minors to work full time as labourers, for a reputable Canadian business, and got paid $1.25 an hour?

    Frank: Well, actually until you were 18 you got paid $60 every two weeks. So I would have been working full time for four years by then.

    Truman: When I was about 19 they decided to start paying us $300 every two weeks, but we were supposed to start buying our own vehicles with that.

    It sounds suspiciously like child labour. […]

    Link.

    Mormon boys sent from Utah to Idaho for “repentance”: Link

    I have more references, and will post those later.

  376. says

    Harry Reid just endorsed Hillary Clinton:

    Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) on Wednesday endorsed Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid in an interview with CNN, a few days after she won Nevada Democratic caucus.

    “I think the middle class would be better served by Hillary. I think that my work with her over the years has been something that I have looked upon with awe,” he told CNN in an interview published on Wednesday. “When she was the first lady, she started the trend toward doing something about health care.”

    Reid told CNN that he called Sanders with the news about his endorsement personally. Reid said Sanders was “so magnanimous, so kind and courteous.” […]

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/harry-reid-endorses-hillary-clinton

  377. blf says

    Frothing fermenting fruitcakes fail fundamentals, Oregon militia standoff: Ammon Bundy and 15 others plead not guilty (just a jaw-dropping snippet):

    When officials told them they were presumed innocent until found guilty, some of the militia suspects complained that they have been incarcerated in jail and that the government was not treating them like they were innocent.

    Ryan Payne, one of the key militia leaders with a long history of protesting the federal government, said he didn’t understand how he could be presumed innocent when we have spent the past month in prison and are led around in chains and shackles everywhere we go.

  378. says

    More links to Mormon Moments of Madness, for blf. (The old link-heavy comment is still in moderation, so if we end up with duplications, I apologize.)

    Lost boys connected to both Canadian and Utah polygamist colonies:
    http://www.filmwest.com/Catalogue/itemdetail/3330/

    Boys from the Kingston polygamist clan: Rolling Stone link.
    […] Boys work its coal mine and stack boxes at Standard Restaurant Supply, a massive discount store. They are paid not in cash but in scrip, an arcane form of credit used by the Mormon pioneers that can only be redeemed at company stores. […]

    It is not uncommon for boys from polygamist colonies to be sent to other polygamist outposts to “repent” for supposed sins, especially if men in the other outpost can use the boys as slave labor:

    RICHARD REAM

    In his affidavit, Mr. Ream says he was born in Magna, Utah, and grew up as one of 31 children, including 18 “full-blooded” siblings and 12 half-brothers and half-sisters.

    As a teen, he got into trouble for having a relationship with a young woman. He was sent to Bountiful, B.C., to work at a lumber operation owned by Winston Blackmore – who was leader of the FLDS community of Bountiful until a church power struggle early this decade and remains the head of about 500 residents who stayed loyal to him after the split.[…]

    The Globe and Mail link.

  379. F.O. says

    Interesting take on Trump’s success: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/24/donald-trump-victory-nevada-caucus-voter-anger and perfectly explains why the overlap between Trump and Sanders voters.

    Anger is pretty easy to miss when it’s something pretty difficult to feel. When you sit at the center of the world and are unlikely to ever lack for the basic materials of self-sufficiency, the idea of blind, gnawing resentment – let alone of feeding that resentment even with irrational aims – is ineluctably beyond your ken.

  380. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    A poll on Sanders’ “medicare for everyone” shows that the RW propaganda machine has poisoned the well.

    At first blush, many Americans like the idea of “Medicare for all,” the government-run health system that’s a rallying cry for Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.
    But mention some of the trade-offs — from higher taxes to giving up employer coverage — and support starts to shrivel.
    That’s the key insight from an Associated Press-GfK poll released Thursday. The survey also found that people’s initial impressions of Sanders’ single-payer plan are more favorable than their views of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul.
    A slim plurality of 39 percent supports replacing the private health insurance system with a single government-run, taxpayer-funded plan that would cover medical, dental, vision and long-term care, with 33 percent opposed. Only 26 percent say they support Obama’s hard-won health care law.

    The poisoned well shows up here:

    Elizabeth Medina of Chicago, an office manager not currently working, said she worries that quality would slip.
    “Overall it sounds terrific,” she said. “Yeah! Let’s go for it! But Europe and Canada have their problems with the single-payer system … it’s subpar.”

    Reality from that bastion of progressivism Forbes magazine:

    Earlier this year, Cadillac ran a controversial TV ad that first aired during the opening ceremonies of the 2014 Winter Olympics. It was called “Poolside” and featured actor Neal McDonough extolling America’s work ethic over other countries — specifically France.
    Turns out that many of those “other countries” (including France) score better than the U.S. in one key metric not included in Cadillac’s TV spot — healthcare. At least that’s according to The Commonwealth Fund in their latest report “Mirror, Mirror On The Wall — 2014 Update” (pdf here).
    For this year’s survey on overall health care, The Commonwealth Fund ranked the U.S. dead last .
    1. United Kingdom
    2. Switzerland
    3. Sweden
    4. Australia
    5. Germany & Netherlands (tied)
    7. New Zealand & Norway (tied)
    9. France
    10. Canada
    11. United States

    The US paid $8500 per capita, compared to <$5700 for the second most expensive care. The 10 lowest cost countries all have socialized medicine.

  381. says

    Nerd @420, I had to laugh at “that bastion of progressivism Forbes magazine.” It is true that right-wingers have been pushing the meme that universal healthcare in the UK, Switzerland, etc. is bad healthcare. They eagerly promote all “had to wait for months to get an appointment” stories. The numbers don’t lie. Republicans do lie.

    F.O. @419, Trump is really good at stoking the “gnawing resentment.” Not surprisingly, some Trump supporters really do not believe he is going to build a wall on the U.S./Mexico border, but they don’t care. They want someone to poke a finger in everyone’s eye, and that someone is Trump. Chris Hayes talks with a few caucus-goers supporting Trump in Las Vegas. The video is 8:01 minutes long. It’s enlightening.

  382. says

    One of Trump’s weaknesses that has not been hit hard enough is this fiction that he is a good businessman. He is ruthless in some ways that may work well for making money, but more than one person has made his success possible and/or bailed him out of financial trouble (his daddy and a Saudi prince for example). Then there are the four bankruptcies, coupled with his insistence (repeated today) that he will not release his IRS tax returns for the past few years.

    Rubio has chosen the wrong weakness to hit: he is repeating that Trump is insufficiently hostile to Obamacare. I don’t think that’s going to work.

  383. says

    Voting in South Carolina begins in two days for Democrats. Polls show Clinton with a commanding lead there. Wisely, Sanders is focusing on Massachusetts, Virginia, Missouri and Oklahoma. At least, that’s what his campaign schedule reveals.

    Trump can trumpet the fact that he won more Hispanic votes than his Republican competitors in Nevada (still a tiny percentage of the Latino population), but he can’t hide from the fact that the latest polling shows that 8 in 10 Hispanic voters nationwide have an unfavorable opinion of the Trumpster.
    Washington Post link.

  384. blf says

    Lynna@422, Teh robot is campaigning against Obama and the policies teh robot attributes to Obama. Teh robot is not campaigning against anyone else, and also not campaigning for anything, other than not being Obama and undoing everything teh robot attributes to Obama.

    That is, broadly speaking, what earned him the nickname “teh robot”: His current campaign plan is to let the other thugs beat each other up. He’ll avoid the fighting, attacking instead the universal enemy, Obama, and as a result not be attacked — how can you attack attacking Obama? — and hence “obviously” be the “best”, albeit perhaps compromise, thug candidate at the convention, as the only one not beaten into a pulp by the other thug candidates.

    Of course that idiotic plan has all come a bit unglued, but it seems to me quite telling he is still robotically following teh Robothug attacks Obama script.

  385. says

    Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman James M. Inhofe (Republican doofus from Oklahoma who once brought a snowball into the Senate chamber to disprove global warming) said some alarmingly stupid stuff:

    The media’s attention to Flint has put a spotlight on the crisis we face across the nation due to a failure to address aging water infrastructure. As a result of misplaced priorities of President Obama, who has consistently failed to partner with the states to address our nation’s real needs, stories are emerging in East Los Angeles, Baltimore, communities across Ohio, and elsewhere about lead pipes and other infrastructure problems that put the health of our citizens at risk.

    “In my leadership role on the EPW Committee, I have watched the Obama administration prioritize more than $120 billion for the president’s global warming agenda at the expense of real investment in critical infrastructure.”

    U.S. Senate Committee link.

    Hey dunderhead, it is possible to address global warming and the poisoning of Flint, Michigan’s water at the same time.

    Hey dunderhead, it was the Republican administration in Michigan that ignored expert opinions and chose a different water source for Flint. The reason: to save money. (Other reason: they are stupid and/or blindly focused on money issues to the detriment of public health issues.)

    Hey dunderhead, President Obama has pushed for infrastructure investments repeatedly. You were one of the dunderheads that said “no.”

  386. nahuati says

    NPR reported 10 States Where Millennials Could Sway The Election

    The main conclusion for Kawashima-Ginsberg was that young people, when they’re actually targeted, can help win elections — especially in these 10 states, ordered from least important to most important in terms of youth vote.

    The ten states listed: Nevada, North Carolina, Florida, Virginia, Wisconsin, Colorado, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire and Iowa.

  387. says

    Rubio is losing by double digits in his home state of Florida, according to the most recent polls. Rubio used to live in Nevada and he lost there. A lot of Republican donors and politicians are jumping on the Rubio-can-win bandwagon, but I don’t see that happening. Wishful thinking, just like Robot Rubio’s idea that being anti-Obama is enough.

    In other news, Trump does not follow his own advice when it comes to immigrants. The New York Times took a look at Trump’s hiring practices at Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach:

    Since 2010, nearly 300 United States residents have applied or been referred for jobs as waiters, waitresses, cooks and housekeepers there. But according to federal records, only 17 have been hired.

    In all but a handful of cases, Mar-a-Lago sought to fill the jobs with hundreds of foreign guest workers from Romania and other countries. […]

    But he has also pursued more than 500 visas for foreign workers at Mar-a-Lago since 2010, according to the United States Department of Labor, while hundreds of domestic applicants failed to get the same jobs.

  388. says

    http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/02/24/tara-houska-ojibwe-named-native-american-advisor-bernie-sanders-163531

    The article is about Sanders adding a Native American woman to his advisory team.

    “I hope to elevate Native American issues at a high level,” she said. “Too much of America is unaware of the plights our communities face, and we are tired of hearing more of the same from politicians. I look forward to continued and expanded outreach in Indian country. Our voices and our votes matter.”

  389. says

    Prominent Mexicans are giving Trump the finger (figuratively):

    Former Mexico President Vicente Fox had a strong message for Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump [in an interview that aired today]: Mexico is “not going to pay for that fucking wall.” […]

    “Democracy cannot take us to crazy people,” Fox responded when asked if he was afraid that Trump would win the election. […]

    “It’s not to defend our race, it’s not to defend our creed. It’s to defend this very same nation that is hosting you. This nation is going to fail if it goes into the hand of the crazy guy,” Fox said.

    Current Mexico President Enrique Peña Nieto has also said that our southern neighbors would not be paying for a border wall.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/vincente-fox-to-trump-not-paying-for-wall

  390. says

    Republicans are trying, once again, to save a little money while ignoring the health and welfare of children. They are also ignoring the fact that saving a little money now will result in them having to spend a lot more later. Stupid.

    After pilot programs significantly reduced child hunger in select states over the past few years, the White House wants to expand low-income students’ access to food assistance during the summer.

    But there’s a Republican congressman standing in the way.

    At a hearing on Wednesday focusing on agriculture program spending in fiscal year 2017, Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) acknowledged the summer food assistance program had bipartisan support. But he argued the White House’s proposal to offer assistance to hungry kids is simply too expensive.

    “The administration knows their proposal to expand this program to the tune of $12 billion over 10 years is simply not feasible in this budget climate and through the annual appropriations process,” Aderholt said.

    […] administrators are confident that even a $45 monthly benefit during the summer months can reduce severe food insecurity among low-income children by 30 percent. […]

    [It is] much cheaper than other agricultural programs that Aderholt supports.

    The federal crop insurance program is projected to spend $89.8 billion over 10 years after changes in the 2014 Farm Bill made it more generous. […] it would not be hard to come up with $1.2 billion in annual savings to cover the cost of expanding summer food subsidies. Lawmakers found twice that much to pay for increased funding for medical research last May. […]

    Adding to the absurdity: Letting kids go hungry is actually much more expensive than the program Aderholt doesn’t want to fund. Child hunger damages a child’s educational, health, and behavioral outcomes, raising the odds that a low-income kid will become a high-cost adult. […]

    the farm programs Aderholt supports are a runaway gravy train. Even some conservatives criticize the systems for enriching corporate landowners and insurers under the guise of protecting family farms from risk. […]crop insurance can pay even when a farm is in the black. […]

    The taxpayer-backed insurance system is also a boon to Wall Street firms that sell the policies. Those 18 firms banked a total profit of $10 billion from the system from 2003-2013 and have only taken losses from it in two of the past 20 years. […]

    During deliberations over the Farm Bill, Aderholt supported a House GOP version that would have cut tens of billions of dollars from food stamps. “I wish that poor people would be treated as well as sushi rice in this farm bill, but they are not,” fellow Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) said at the time. […]

    Think Progress link.

  391. says

    Hmm, I wonder what could possibly go wrong with this plan? Utah state senators are overwhelmingly Republican and mormon. How does that make them the right group of people to select who gets to be a U.S. senator to represent the state in Washington? Such a move would certainly consolidate their already considerable power.

    The Utah Senate on Wednesday called on Congress to repeal the 17th Amendment — so that state senators could again select U.S. senators.

    It voted 20-6 to pass SJR2, and sent it to the House. […] Sen. Al Jackson, R-Highland, says electing senators by the state Senate is needed because no branch of the federal government now represents the needs of state governments. A change would force senators to do that. […]

    “It’s time for our senators to come home every weekend and take direction from this body and from the House and the governor on how they should vote in the upcoming week.” […]

    Ha. How very patriarchal of you. How very mormon-church-hierarchy of you.

    Sen. Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City, disputed the plan’s logic. U.S. senators are now the only lawmakers elected by all voters in the state, she said, and therefore are not affected by redistricting that she says may have favored Republicans in Utah. She said repealing the amendment would also take away power from voters.

    http://www.sltrib.com/news/3576711-155/utah-senate-votes-to-repeal-17th

    That’s what Republicans want to do. They want to take power away from voters, and they’re always looking for another way to do that.

    From the readers’ comments:

    […] wouldn’t it be easier for our Utah Senators to simply say “The only people we will approve are GOP/LDS [Latter-day Saints, or mormon] members”
    ————–
    why are our state senators wasting time on things that will never happen. the feds will not repeal our right to elect our senators and will not give up federal lands
    ————–
    I know enough to see Utah Repubtards are worried about losing control of the Senate – in open elections

  392. says

    Holy crap!

    […] A Missouri state representative has introduced a bill would automatically make members of the general assembly lawyers — without law school, bar exams or any of the other training and credentialing that is usually required of attorneys — after they have been in office for two years. The bill would also make those members eligible to serve as Missouri associate or circuit court judges.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/missouri-lawyer-bill

    That way Missouri would be able to put untrained Tea Partiers and religious whackos on the bench as judges … more than they already have.

    One of the funnier comments on this plan was a suggestion that after two years members of the general assembly would also be certified as airline pilots.

  393. says

    Republicans had another debate tonight. Donald Trump and Marco Rubio yelled at each other. Trump tried to interrupt everyone all the time. Rubio finally brought up some real weak points in Trump’s resumé, including his fake university, hiring undocumented immigrants, the bankruptcies, etc. Trump brought up the fact that Rubio sweats a lot and that in poll numbers he beats Rubio in Florida … in other words, Trump did not reply to real criticism with any substantial rebuttal.

    In the spin room after the debate, Trump claimed that he won.

    Katich looked like the only adult in the room.

    Carson said something stupid about fruit salad.

  394. says

    Chris Matthews hosted an hour long event with Bernie Sanders as part of the Hardball College Tour. Sanders made the point that he intends to change the way politics in the United States is conducted.

    Here’s an excerpt, with analysis from Rachel Maddow:
    http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/sanders-wants-to-change-the-face-of-politics-631623235780

    Oh, yeah, one more thing from the Republican debate and the spin room afterward: Ted Cruz implied that Trump was committing tax fraud and/or an ethics violation by not releasing any tax returns from any year. Trump’s excuse for not releasing his most current tax return is that he is being audited. Trump said he would give reporters a list of charitable contributions he has made, but he has said that before and not followed through.

  395. blf says

    Lynna@432, Automatically certifying politicianscrooks after two years does make sense — if they are automatically certified as insane, that is.

    I’d add an amendment to the bill: The state’s capitol building shall prominently display a large and legible sign saying CONTAINS NUTS whenever the legislature is in session.

  396. says

    Regarding that fake university that Marco Rubio mentioned when he attacked Trump during the Republican debate:

    Here’s a part of the political calendar that nobody in the Republican Party seems to have noticed: This spring, just as the GOP nomination battle enters its final phase, frontrunner Donald Trump could be forced to take time out for some unwanted personal business: He’s due to take the witness stand in a federal courtroom in San Diego, where he is being accused of running a financial fraud.

    In court filings last Friday, lawyers for both sides in a long-running civil lawsuit over the now defunct Trump University named Trump on their witness lists. That makes it all but certain that the reality-show star and international businessman will be forced to be grilled under oath over allegations in the lawsuit that he engaged in deceptive trade practices and scammed thousands of students who enrolled in his “university” courses in response to promises he would make them rich in the real estate market.

    Yahoo News link.

  397. says

    In comment 437 I forgot to mention that Ted Cruz also brought up the court case pending against “Trump University.”

    I think this is a legitimate criticism of the Republican strategy to take Trump down:

    By dropping so many attacks at once, Rubio and Cruz also make it difficult to focus on any one issue in four days, giving Trump an opportunity to regain control of the conversation. We’ll never know what might have happened if they had doled out bits of opposition research over months and months instead and litigated each topic one at a time.

    http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ted-cruz-and-marco-rubio-attack-donald-trump-houston-debate

  398. tomh says

    They’re desperate. All they can think of is to throw as much mud as possible and hope something sticks. I don’t like their chances.

  399. says

    Lindsey Graham has been out of the presidential race long enough that he can say what he really thinks:

    During his speech, Graham lamented that Hillary Clinton is about to become president, blaming it on Republicans.

    “How could that be? My party has gone batshit crazy,” he explained.

    He then joked about how much Senate Republicans dislike Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX).

    “If you kill Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody could convict you,” he joked.

    When it came time for Graham to joke and hurl insults at Donald Trump, the senator instead made some sobering remarks.

    “I don’t know how I can best describe Donald Trump, but I can say this, that I don’t think he understands what makes America great. And I know I’m supposed to be funny, but I’m not really happy about where the country is right now,” Graham said. “I could make a million Donald Trump jokes, and I have. But our party and our country is going to have to up its game.”

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/lindsey-graham-republicans-crazy

  400. says

    Donald Trump is upset and he is obsessing over attacks made during last night’s debate. He took to Twitter to vent his spleen. He made so many spelling errors in the tweets that Rubio joked,

    “How does this guy in not one tweet but three tweets misspell words so badly? I only reach two conclusions,” Rubio said. “Number one, that’s how they spell those words at the Wharton School of Business where he went. Or number two, just like Trump Tower, he must have hired a foreign worker to do his own tweets.”

    Trump deleted the tweets that misspelled “choker,” “lightweight” and “honor.” Then he reposted them with corrected spelling. A lot of people saved screen grabs of the tweet in which the Trumpster wrote, “Wow, every poll said I won the debate last night. Great honer!”

    In other debate news, during the breaks the Trumpster requested a full-length mirror. The better to view his full glory, I guess.

    BTW, a lot of the debate coverage indicates that Trump did not win the debate last night. I think his toadies must have dug up at least focus group that said he did.

    Donald Trump has gotten very used to winning recently, after racking up three straight primary and caucus wins. He’s even promised to win so much that Americans will get sick of winning.

    But he didn’t get a victory in Houston on Thursday.

    It was Trump’s worst debate of the campaign, and the defeat came largely at the hands of Marco Rubio, who hit Trump early and often. The climactic moment arrived during a discussion of health insurance. Every candidate has promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, but with what? Trump’s answer was that he’d allow the sale of insurance across state lines. Rubio pressed him: Is that all you’ve got? When Trump tried to slap back, Rubio was ready.

    “He’s repeating himself!” Rubio exclaimed with a grin, echoing the very attack Chris Christie used so effectively against him just a few weeks ago. “I’m not repeating myself. I’m not repeating myself,” Trump insisted, but he was practically drowned out by the huge round of applause sweeping the hall. […]

    Atlantic link.

  401. says

    The mass shooting in Heston, Kansas yesterday did not get a single mention in the Republican debate. Daily Kos link.

    Four people are dead, if you include the gunman, and 16 are wounded, some critically.

    There was also no mention of the earlier shooting in Kalamazoo, Michigan by an Uber driver. Jason Dalton’s friends said he was a gun enthusiast and a staunch Second Amendment supporter. He also, according to some reports, believed rightwing/Republican conspiracy theories that claim President Obama is going to take away everyone’s guns and ammo. Link.

  402. says

    The story behind Trump’s use of undocumented workers to build Trump tower:

    […] The 200 demolition workers—nicknamed the Polish Brigade because of their home country—worked 12-hour shifts, seven days a week with no overtime to knock down the old Bonwit Teller building and make room for Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.

    According to testimony in a protracted civil suit in federal court, the laborers were paid $5 an hour or less when they were paid at all. Some went unpaid after the contractor had financial troubles. A few never received even the paltry sum that was owed them for their dirty and hazardous efforts preceding the construction of Trump’s monument to his own wealth.

    “They were undocumented and worked ‘off the books,’” Manhattan federal Judge Charles Stewart said of the workers after they became the subject of a 1983 lawsuit. “No records were kept, no Social Security or other taxes were withheld.” […]

    Daily Beast link.

  403. says

    Chris Christie just endorsed Donald Trump. Christie’s endorsement seemed to be based on the fact that he thinks Trump is less of a criminal than Hillary Clinton. Christie repeated rightwing myths about Clinton as if they were true. He noted that Trump’s troubles in court were all civil cases, money issues. And we all know that money issues can’t be criminal. /sarcasm

    In other news, the Trumpster floated the theory that he is being targeted by the IRS “maybe because of the fact that I’m a strong Christian.”
    Link.

    I needed a good laugh.

  404. says

    Way to go Mississippi Republicans, you proved yourself to be worse than your neighbors.

    States across the Deep South removed Confederate monuments and flags from public buildings last year, putting to rest a contentious symbol of slavery’s dark legacy. But Mississippi Governor Phil Bryant (R) thinks that is the wrong approach.

    Bryant has declared April “Confederate Heritage Month” in his state, a proclamation that a spokesperson for the governor defended Thursday. […]

    […] Bryant said Mississippi residents should “earnestly strive to understand our heritage.” The post also is prominently featured on the page for the Mississippi division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, which the Southern Poverty Law Center identifies as a neo-Confederate group.

    […] Mississippi legislature missed the deadline this week to act on 19 proposals to change the state flag, which features the Confederate battle emblem. […]

    Talking Points Memo link.

  405. says

    Merriam-Webster had some fun with Donald Trump’s misspelled words:

    […] Merriam-Webster tweeted that one of Trump’s misspellings – “honer” instead of honor – is indeed a real word in their dictionary. But for “chocker,” Trump’s take on the word “choker,” the brand only linked to its entry for “nope.”

    There was also no such luck for “leightweight,” a fake word Trump used to describe Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) after Thursday night’s presidential debate. […]

    honer: one that hones (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hone ) […]

    Trump went on a tear during the debate, hurling a laundry list of insults at his opponents. There was no word on whether they were spelled correctly in his head.

    Link.

  406. says

    This is a followup to comment 442. The shooter in Kansas has a history of domestic abuse.

    […] Authorities say that Ford’s shooting spree may have been prompted by a restraining order that prevented him from contacting someone he had abused. About 90 minutes before he first opened fire, Ford received a “protection from abuse” order. […]

    According to a Wichita Eagle report, a woman who identified herself as Ford’s live-in girlfriend filed an order of protection against him earlier this month. The woman said that, after a verbal altercation between the two of them turned violent, Ford attempted to strangle her.

    When she petitioned for an order of protection, the woman indicated that Ford was moving out of their place. She also expressed her concerns about Ford’s mental state. “He is an alcoholic, violent, depressed,” she wrote. “It’s my belief he is in desperate need of medical & psychological help!” […]

    Another gunman who recently perpetrated a mass shooting — Robert Lewis Dear, who killed three people at a Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood clinic last fall — also had a history of domestic violence. […]

    domestic violence incidents have been conclusively linked to future violent crimes. […]

    Think Progress link.

    So, why did the guy still have a gun?

  407. says

    The story of malfeasance (or negligence?) and general stupidity on the part of Republican officials in Flint, Michigan just continues to worsen:

    […] In a review of 550 emails released by Michigan’s Republican Gov. Rick Snyder this week, Detroit Free Press reporters Matthew Dolan and Paul Egan found that the governor was informed early on after Flint stopped getting its drinking water from the Detroit water system and switched to the Flint River as a source that the city’s water quality plunged.

    The emails also showed that an effort was made at the time to keep the state’s Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) out of the loop so that tainted-water worries would not be subject to discovery via the Freedom of Information Act. Michigan exempts the governor’s office and legislation from public records disclosure. The governor began releasing another 6,000-8,000 emails Friday, so more revelations can be expected. […]

    Link.

  408. says

    A federal lawsuit has been filed against Walmart for filling parmesan cheese with wood pulp. Link.

    I don’t think “filling” is the right word here. The cheese does contain fillers, such as wood pulp, and that’s not good, but I haven’t found a source yet for the percentage of filler that was used.

  409. says

    Trump is harassing Mitt Romney with insults. Most of his insults have no real substance, but some of them are novel, like the “penguin” insult:

    Number one, when you walk into a state you cannot walk like a penguin. He walked like a penguin. I said this is a problem.

  410. says

    Donald Trump has decided to take his fight with the media one step further. He says that if he is elected president he will make it easier to sue the media for libel. Sounds like a really bad idea to me.

    […] “I think the media is among the most dishonest groups of people I’ve ever met. They’re terrible. The New York Times, which is losing a fortune, which is a failing newspaper, which probably won’t be around that much longer, but probably somebody will buy it as a trophy, keep it going for a little longer — I think the New York Times is one of the most dishonest media outlets I’ve ever seen in my life,” Trump said. “The worst. The worst. The absolute worst.” […]

    “I have to tell you I have respect for Jeff Bezos, but he bought the Washington Post to have political influence, and I got to tell you we have a different country than we used to have,” Trump said. “He owns Amazon. He wants political influence so that Amazon will benefit from it.” […]

    He [Trump] said he’s “going to open up our libel laws so when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money.”

    “We’re going to open up those libel laws. So that when the New York Times writes a hit piece, which is a total disgrace, or the Washington Post, which is there for other reasons, writes a hit piece, we can sue them and win money instead of having no chance of winning because they’re totally protected,” Trump said.

    Trump told the media that “we’re gonna have people sue you like you’ve never got sued before.”

    Current libel law dictates that public figures can only win a lawsuit against a media outlet if they can prove that the paper published a negative piece with the intention of malice.

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-libel-sue-media

  411. says

    What is South Carolina’s voter ID law all about? It’s about race.

    […] Ed Koziol, a Republican supporter of the law, wrote an e-mail to the bill’s author, Representative Alan Clemmons of Myrtle Beach, saying that if African Americans were offered a $100 award for obtaining voter ID, “you would see how fast they got voter ID cards with their picture. It would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” […]

    http://www.thenation.com/article/63756-reasons-why-racism-is-still-alive-in-south-carolina/

    The article in The Nation opens with the story of Larrie Butler, an African American man who tried really hard to follow the new voter ID law. He encountered obstruction and ridiculous demands at every step along the way.

  412. says

    Good analysis of Trump from Charles Murray, a political scientist who wrote the book, “Coming Apart.”

    It’s like Wolfgang Pauli’s famous crack, “That is not only not right, it is not even wrong.” He doesn’t even have a bad character. People with bad characters can have strengths. As far as I can tell he has no character. He’s a bully with subordinates.

    He does business in ways that good businesspeople despise—and he’s not even very good at that.

    He says things about people, especially his wives, that are so obnoxious that calling them obnoxious doesn’t come close to how awful they are.

    He constantly lies about things that can be checked.

    He brags incessantly—really unattractive in itself—but he doesn’t even brag about things that he could appropriately be proud of. The guy is pathetic.

    The oddest thing about his popularity with white middle-class and working-class males is that if he lived next door to them, they would despise him.

    New Yorker link.

  413. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Some shadowy conservative/reactionary groups are funding advocate campaigns in state judicial elections. First up Arkansas.

    Instead, the barrage is focused on two state Supreme Court races that have become Arkansas’ most fiercely fought contests, thanks to the ramped up efforts of outside conservative groups to reshape the nation’s state courts by shattering spending records.
    The Judicial Crisis Network, a Washington-based group, has spent more than $600,000 on television ads targeting Justice Courtney Goodson as she runs for the chief justice post. A second group, the Republican State Leadership Committee’s Judicial Fairness Initiative, has bought about $250,000 worth of airtime for spots criticizing a Little Rock attorney in another high court race.
    The nearly $1.3 million spent on TV airtime alone more than doubles the previous Arkansas record for such spending in a judicial election, according to campaign finance groups.
    “This is the new normal for supreme court races nationwide,” said Laurie Kinney, spokeswoman for Justice at Stake, a Washington-based group that along with the Brennan Center for Justice has been tracking the judicial election spending. “What Arkansas is experiencing right now is really a trend we’ve been noticing more and more nationwide.”
    Arkansas is the key battleground now because its nonpartisan judicial elections are held earlier than other states’. Similar campaigns will unfold elsewhere later this year.

  414. says

    All of the stupidest bullies are lining up behind Trump. That includes former KKK leader, David Duke. Now Maine’s governor Paul LePage has joined them.

    “He’s a businessman. I’m a businessman,” LePage said. “I think he could be one of the greatest presidents if he sits down and puts together a good team. I was Donald Trump before Donald Trump became popular.”

    The scorecard for current, sitting GOP governors who have endorsed a candidate shows that 9 out of 31 have made public endorsements:
    4 governors back Rubio
    2 governors back Trump
    2 governors back Kasich
    1 backs Cruz

  415. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Update on Lynna’s #442 Kansas shooting. A woman has been charged with providing guns to the shooter, a convicted felon.

    The Latest on the attack at a central Kansas factory (all times local):
    5:40 p.m.
    A woman has been charged with providing guns to the man who killed three people and injured several others at a factory in Kansas.
    U.S. Attorney Barry Grissom said Friday that 28-year-old Sarah T. Hopkins is charged with one count of knowingly transferring a firearm to a convicted felon.
    An affidavit says the Newton woman gave Cedric Ford two guns: a Zastava Serbia, which is an AK-47-type semi-automatic rifle, and a Glock Model 22 40-caliber handgun.
    Prosecutors say Hopkins knew Ford wasn’t allowed to have a firearm because he was a convicted felon.
    Police fatally shot Ford during the shooting at Excel Industries in nearby Hesston on Thursday.
    Hopkins is in custody. She’s expected to make a first court appearance Monday.
    A phone call to a number listed for her was not answered. Court records do not indicate Hopkins has an attorney.

    No facepalm/headdesk/bodyfloor is sufficient to describe that idiocy.

  416. says

    The numbers, the probability figures … they all show that without some unforeseen event, Trump will get the GOP nomination.

    Yes, the Republican Party will tear itself to pieces if that happens. Mitch McConnell announced that he would run the other way as fast as he could, or something like that. What he actually said:

    […] McConnell is assuring Senate candidates running for reelection that they should feel free to run ads against Trump if they feel he is hurting their own campaigns. According to senators attending private lunches with the Majority Leader, McConnell is taking the approach that Trump will lose badly in the general election and that senators should sell themselves as a bulwark against a Hillary Clinton presidency.

    Pointing out that he still won easily when President Bill Clinton was reelected, McConnell reportedly told colleagues that the party will drop Trump “like a hot rock” if he is the nominee.

    News of the party’s preemptive rejection of the potential nominee comes after a luncheon meeting attended by Republican governors and donors in Washington on Feb. 19 where political guru Karl Rove warned that Trump may be unstoppable for the GOP — and that his nomination could destroy other Republican candidate’s chances in November.

    According to people who attended a private presentation hosted by the conservative billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch, Trump’s record was deemed utterly unacceptable, causing high profile donors to hold back on donations out of fear it will be money that will be wasted. […]

    Raw Story link.

  417. says

    This is a followup to comment 429.

    Former Mexican President Vincente Fox already said that Mexicans are not going to pay for Trump’s “fucking wall.” Yesterday, he continued to criticize Trump by telling a CNN host that Trump reminds him of Hitler.

    […] “He’s going to take that nation back to the old days of conflict, war, and everything,” he said, adding that Trump “reminds me of Hitler.” […]

    Fox told CNN on Friday that he will make “no apologies,” but would be willing to speak to Trump.

    “He has offended Mexico, Mexicans, immigrants. He has offended the Pope. He has offended the Chinese. He’s offended everybody.” […]

    Link

    Trump’s response to the comment about the “fucking wall” was predictable. Trump said he will build a higher wall. (That wall has just gone up by ten feet, paraphrased.) Trump, who has been called out several times for swearing during his campaign speeches, also wants Vincente Fox to apologize for cursing.

  418. tomh says

    @ #458
    I agree that Trump is almost certain to be the nominee. But I’m not buying all these naysayers that claim they won’t support him. They’re trying their best to derail the nomination, but when push comes to shove, they’ll get behind him, just because they know the value of having a Republican president, any Republican, to rubber-stamp a Republican Congress. There will be no vetoes, as there would be with a Democrat in the White House, and every regressive bill passed will become law. All this primary crap will be forgiven and forgotten.

  419. says

    Nerd @457, I was shocked to hear that an ex-girlfriend gave the shooter two guns. It makes me wonder if Ford (the shooter) threatened her. As an aside, what was she doing with a Zastava Serbia (AK-47-type semi-automatic rifle) and a Glock Model 22 40-caliber handgun?

    Another shooting occurred just a few hours later in Washington State. A man killed four people in his home. Police saved one person, a 12-year-old girl.

  420. says

    tomh@461, good point. It is also likely that Republicans hate Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton more than they hate Donald Trump. And there is the inescapable fact that some Republicans love Donald Trump.

    Still, there would be some level of upheaval if Trump is nominated, and that might help the Dems take back the Senate. The U.S. House of Representatives is a lost cause at this point, with gerrymandered voting districts and voter ID laws helping to keep even the most hapless Republicans in office.

  421. says

    Yikes! Racist memorabilia is worse than I thought.
    Mother Jones link.

    Some people are turning the “contemptible collectibles” into a learning experience.

    […] Pilgrim transformed his 3,200-item collection into the Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia at Michigan’s Ferris State University, where he teaches sociology. He presents a selection of these appalling objects and images in his new book, Understanding Jim Crow: Using Racist Memorabilia to Teach Tolerance and Promote Social Justice. As the title implies, the book isn’t merely an exercise in shock value. It lays out the philosophy behind Pilgrim’s work as a scholar and an activist: that only by acknowledging these artifacts and their persistence in American culture can we honestly confront our not-so-distant past. […]

  422. says

    The ugly truth behind Trump’s supporters:

    […] almost a fifth of Trump voters believe it was not a good idea to free the slaves in the Southern states following the Civil War. Five percent of Rubio’s voters hold this view.

    Salon link.

  423. says

    Chris Hayes explains how Donald Trump uses Fox News’ tactics to attack the media. The video is 5:50 minutes long.

    There’s also text at the link. Excerpts:

    […] For years, right-leaning outlets like Fox News and talk radio have been telling their audience, day after day, that any information coming from outside of conservative media is not to be trusted. It’s has been an ingeniously effective way to consolidate their own influence, and insulate themselves from any external criticism.

    Not only has Trump adopted that tactic, attacking usual suspects like The New York Times and The Washington Post, but he’s turning it back on the conservative media who invented it in first place. After starting a blood feud with Fox News, something no Republican presidential candidate has dared to do before, Trump seems to have successfully undermined the network in the eyes of its core audience — with perception of the Fox News brand among Republican adults hitting its lowest point in three years […] And after being asked about his tax returns at last night’s debate, Trump initially dodged the question by insulting moderator Hugh Hewitt, using Fox News’ favorite method of taunting, ratings. […]

    I had crazy experience when I was talking to voters at the Nevada caucus the other night in Vegas. Voter after voter after voter, these are Republican, you know primary voters, caucus-goers saying “I don’t listen to Fox anymore, I can’t trust Fox anymore, I’m over them.” And these were all Trump supporters, who he had successfully sort of pried their trust away from the thing they have been trusting for years. And now, when Megyn Kelly says something about him they just dismiss it, because it’s not — It’s all consider the source. It’s not evaluating the information on its own, it’s just consider the source. […]

  424. says

    This backs up tomh’s point in comment 461:

    Rep. Trent Franks (Ariz.), a member of the conservative Freedom Caucus, began circulating his letter Wednesday night. In it, he pleads with Rubio and Cruz to decide that one of them will be the other’s vice presidential running mate and focus on defeating Trump, who Franks fears can’t beat Hillary Clinton in the November election.

    “Now is a time for choosing — for you, and for us,” reads the letter. “Through rivalry, disunity, and baseless hatred in our ranks, conservatives are now in danger of splintering our voice and ensuring that the Republican Party’s nominee in the general election is Mr. Trump who is incontrovertibly, the weakest General Election candidate in the Republican field with the strongest probability of allowing Hillary Clinton to become President.”

    Huff Po link

    But, the doofus goes on to say:

    “If Mr. Trump becomes the nominee, I will support him robustly,” said Franks.

  425. says

    Actually, a lot of people have scrutinized Donald Trump’s business practices in the past. Two years ago, Chris Hayes produced a piece on the fraudulent Trump University. In July of last year David Cay Johnston published “21 Questions for Donald Trump,” and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. But, it wasn’t until the most recent Republican debate that Trump’s GOP rivals finally decided to take a closer look at the negatives in Trump’s past. Trump can consider himself lucky that it took that long.

    A recent New Yorker article examined Trump’s business career.

    […] Johnston’s article was based on almost three decades of following Trump’s business career and writing about him. The topics he raised ranged from a bribery investigation in New Jersey during the nineteen-seventies, to allegations that a Mafia-related company helped to build Trump Tower, to the contents of Trump’s tax returns, to his failure to contribute a single dollar to his eponymous charitable foundation since 2006. […]

    Apart from a few jibes in the early debates about some of his casinos seeking bankruptcy protection, the Republican front-runner had been getting off pretty much scot-free. […]

    He [Marco Rubio] accused Trump of hiring “people from other countries to take jobs that Americans could have filled,” including some illegal immigrants. Rubio pointed out that some of the clothes Trump sells are made in Mexico, which he routinely accuses of stealing American jobs. He pointed out that some former students at Trump University are suing the school. […]

    Trump sought to dismiss the attacks. (He called Rubio a “choke artist” and Cruz a “liar.”) But the questions will not go away.[…] Although he likes to portray himself as a successful entrepreneur who created a vastly profitable business, many people in the business world have long regarded him as a self-promoting huckster who emblazons his name on properties that don’t belong to him and habitually overstates his net worth. […]

    The immediate question is why Trump is delaying the release of his tax returns. […] In the nineteen-seventies, Johnston pointed out, Trump didn’t pay any federal tax at all for several years. […]

    My favorite theory is that the returns will show that Trump’s income isn’t very high by the standards of the mega-rich, casting doubt on his claim to be worth at least ten billion dollars. Indeed, he already appears to be hinting at this. During the debate, he claimed that tax returns don’t give any indication of a person’s wealth, which is nonsense. […]

    I snipped text describing the hiring of undocumented Polish workers to build Trump tower, and the current issue with Trump properties in Florida, as we had already discussed those up-thread.

    […] Back in the nineteen-seventies, Johnston points out, New York City Mayor Abe Beame gave Trump a four-hundred-million-dollar tax abatement to facilitate his first big real-estate deal, the conversion of a hotel next to Grand Central Terminal. During the nineteen-eighties, when the city refused to give Trump seven hundred million dollars in tax breaks for his controversial Riverside South development, he had a bitter dispute with Mayor Ed Koch. What deals were done to grease the wheels of his various developments in Atlantic City and Las Vegas, at least one of which, Johnston writes, involved a banker for a mob boss? […]

  426. Tethys says

    During the debate, he claimed that tax returns don’t give any indication of a person’s wealth, which is nonsense.

    It’s only nonsense if you aren’t obscenely wealthy enough to have your wealth hidden away in various other countries to keep it from the IRS. Trumps supporters might be the uneducated, but they aren’t so stupid as to not notice that they paid their taxes, but Trump has paid zero despite huge income differences.

  427. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Dang, I was hoping for a quiet democratic primary for congress, but it even made the national news.

    After fueling months of fights in Washington, President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran is now popping up in an unusual place: a Democratic primary north of Chicago, splitting party leaders’ loyalties and making Republicans giddy about a potentially weakened opponent in one of 2016’s most competitive U.S. House races.
    U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the minority whip who had the monumental job of securing Democratic support for Obama’s plan, is backing suburban mayor Nancy Rotering over former U.S. Rep. Brad Schneider in the 10th Congressional district primary, largely because she expressed support for the pact and Schneider initially opposed it.
    A one-time White House counsel and prominent Democrat who held the seat in the 1970s, Abner Mikva, also abandoned Schneider for Rotering, writing in an open letter that he was disappointed in Schneider for “opposing your president and your party.”
    Schneider, who held the seat for one term before losing to Republican U.S. Rep. Bob Dold in 2014, has endorsements from Democratic House Leader Nancy Pelosi, other current House members and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. He also has a fundraising advantage.
    But it’s unclear how much sway the Iran deal or big-name endorsements might have when voters go to the polls next month.

    Schneider also voted against parts of ACA while in congress. Time for a new, more progressive candidate. The ballots will be mailed next week for the 3/15 primary.

  428. tomh says

    The NRA is up to their usual mischief. The Iowa House just passed a bill, The Youth Safety & Parental Rights Act (House File 2281), which would allow people under the age of 14 to handle “a pistol, revolver or the ammunition” in the presence of an adult. Current law prohibits handguns for anyone under the age of 14. This must be a pressing issue in Iowa, since this line is included in the bill. “This Act, being deemed of immediate importance, takes effect upon enactment.”

  429. says

    Votes in the South Carolina Democratic primary are still being counted, but the winner has been declared. Hillary Clinton is winning with somewhere north of 75% of the vote. In a few counties, she even took more of the black vote than Barack Obama did in 2012. Her campaign will be happy to see that she is even winning the white vote (53% so far).

    I’ll check the results again tomorrow.

    Clinton used her victory speech to take a few swipes at Donald Trump, and she referenced Black Lives Matter issues. She mentioned Flint, Michigan; Trayvon Martin’s mother; the mother of Eric Garner; and others. She had appreciative words for Bernie Sanders.

    I listened to Bernie Sanders’ concession speech, but I don’t see a source yet on the internet. We’ll get that tomorrow. He was very gracious.

    Slate link to video of the Clinton speech.

  430. says

    Representative Tulsi Gabbard was the Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee. Today, she announced she is resigning the vice chair positions because she does not want to remain neutral in the presidential campaign. She endorses Sen. Bernie Sanders for President.
    Link.

  431. says

    Now that Chris Christie has endorsed Donald Trump, the Trumpster has rewritten recent political history in Christies’s favor:

    “I think it is politics,” Trump said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I mean, people say things, and then all of a sudden, reality sets in. And he’s great. He’s a great guy. He’s the one endorsement I really wanted. I wanted it badly.”

    Back when Christie was not a Trump supporter, he sounded more realistic to me:

    As Christie sought the GOP nomination, he called Trump “thin-skinned” and a “13-year old” for skipping the Fox News presidential debate. Christie also said Trump’s proposed ban on Muslims was “ridiculous.”

  432. says

    How Donald Trump refuses to disavow former KKK leader, David Duke:

    “I don’t know anything about David Duke,” he said. “I don’t know what you’re even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacist. I don’t know. I don’t know, did he endorse me, or what’s going on? Because, you know, I know nothing about David Duke. I know nothing about white supremacists. And so you’re asking me a question that I’m supposed to be talking about people that I know nothing about.”

  433. says

    Regarding the lawsuit he is facing over his fake university, Trump said some stupid stuff:

    Trump suggested that a 2013 lawsuit over his controversial Trump University has been impacted by a “very hostile” Latino judge. He repeated his concerns on Fox, saying that he might ask the judge to recuse himself.

    “I think it has to do with, perhaps, because I’m very, very strong on the border,” he said to Chris Wallace on Fox on Sunday. “He is Hispanic, I believe, and he is a very hostile judge to me.”

    Politico link.

  434. says

    Some people who used to work for Chris Christie see his about-face to support Trump as just political opportunism. Here’s what Meg Whitman, national finance co-chair for New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie presidential campaign before Christie quit the race:

    Chris Christie’s endorsement of Donald Trump is an astonishing display of political opportunism. Donald Trump is unfit to be President. He is a dishonest demagogue who plays to our worst fears. Trump would take America on a dangerous journey. Christie knows all that and indicated as much many times publicly. The Governor is mistaken if he believes he can now count on my support, and I call on Christie’s donors and supporters to reject the Governor and Donald Trump outright. I believe they will. For some of us, principle and country still matter.

    NBC News link.

  435. says

    Really, Donald? The Trumpster retweeted a quote from Italian fascist Benito Mussolini. “It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep.”

    The quote came for the account ilduce2016, which has an avatar that is an image of Mussolini with Trump’s hair added.

  436. says

    Trump continues to make noises about leaving the Republican Party if they don’t treat him right. He has added a new twist, the claim that the Republican Party “is not being run properly.”

    […] Trump told CNN host Jake Tapper that he was representing “a lot of anger out there” in his bid for the White House, including people angry at the Republican party.

    “And a lot of them are angry at the way the republican party is being run, Jake,” Trump said on “State of the Union.” “And the Republican party is not being run properly.” […]

    [Trump] noted that he signed a pledge to run as a Republican in the election.

    “And the pledge is a two-way street And if it’s not that way, they’re going to have a big problem with me,” Trump said, adding that he could “play that game.”

    Sounds to me like a man looking for a way out of a brokered convention. Or it may be one of Trump’s knee-jerk moments during which he threatens everyone, including the GOP. If Trump takes all his marbles and leaves the Republican game, that will be … interesting.

    Talking Points Memo link.

  437. says

    @Lynna 466
    I’m fascinated and sometimes horrified by things like this. Any social tool created by any group can’t reliably be guaranteed to be kept to just that group.

    When conservative reactionary types organizing online included telling employers about the supposedly terrible characteristics of the people they were harassing to employers it was bound to be picked up by the public at large and used in more reasonable ways by people like Clementine Ford. If shaming via employer is the best some people can do and the behavior is shameful I’m not going to judge it in a socially inconvenient manner if I can help it.

    In this case their seems to be little benefit outside of political cannibalism and schadenfreude as the behavior being adopted and role-modeled is toxic to getting at the nature of the reality of things. But hopefully some of these newly fox news-paranoid types will adopt some reasoning and logic skills. I hope we get better at defining the limits of specific tactics in specific contexts as a species.

  438. says

    This article covers some familiar ground, but it presents a new emphasis on the racist foundations of conservatism. Here is an excerpt:

    […] for generations Southern bigots remained Democrats because they wanted nothing to do with the Party of Lincoln. […]

    After the plank [a platform plank calling for passage of the Civil Rights Act] was passed, some Southern delegates walked out. They were led by South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond.

    A lot of people don’t remember that Thurmond once was a Democrat. But in 1948, he helped create the Dixiecrat Party, and became its presidential standard bearer. In that famously volatile election year, Thurmond won the states of Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina.

    But the realignment of the parties was only beginning. A lot of Southern conservatives still hated the Republicans that much. Thurmond himself found his way back to the Democratic Party, and served as a Democratic senator until 1964. When President Lyndon Johnson succeeded in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, he told aides that they had lost the South for a generation. Thurmond was among the first to leave. But the realignment still took time. A lot of Southern conservatives still hated the Republicans that much. But times were changing.

    Richard Nixon’s 1968 presidential campaign’s Southern Strategy was designed to capitalize on the evolving loyalties of racists, and segregationist Democrat George Wallace ran under the banner of the American Independent Party and won five southern states. Still, changes in party affiliation continued to lag. In 1980, Republican presidential nominee Ronald Reagan cynically and despicably launched his general election campaign by invoking “states’ rights” in racist fire zone Philadelphia, Mississippi. The people he wanted to impress were duly impressed. In 1988, the kinder, gentler George H.W. Bush nakedly race baited his way to victory. The Bill Clinton presidency completed the realignment. […]

    Donald Trump is nothing new, but for his being open about it. […]

    [The Republican Party] can’t keep it hidden anymore, and they can’t pretend. Donald Trump has torn off the modern Republican Party’s mask. It is neither accident nor fluke that he is becoming their leader. Donald Trump is the modern Republican Party. They own it, and he owns them.

  439. says

    This is a followup to comment 477, in which we see Trump tap dancing around about the endorsement from David Duke. Trump claims he doesn’t know Duke, and knows nothing about him. Trump lied.

    Here are some quotes from 2000, when Trump was considering a run for president:

    […] “As you know, the Reform Party has got some pretty big problems,” Trump said on World News Now in 2000. “Not the least of which is Pat Buchanan, David Duke, Fulani, and it’s a problem.”

    Trump also wrote in the New York Times, “Although I am totally comfortable with the people in the New York Independence Party, I leave the Reform Party to David Duke, Pat Buchanan and Lenora Fulani. That is not company I wish to keep.” […]

    http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/02/28/3754583/trump-david-duke/

  440. says

    Another Donald Trump quote from 2000:

    “The Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani,” the New York Times quoted Trump saying in a statement. “This is not company I wish to keep.”

    Yes, he knew David Duke was a KKK leader.

    Slate link.

  441. says

    Donald Trump thanked another white supremacist in a tweet on Saturday. The man, @NeilTurner claims that “white genocide is real.” The Trump retweet included a “thank you.”

    “@NeilTurner_: @realDonaldTrump There’s only one real candidate, and it’s you! Donors control the other candidates! #VoteTrump” Thank you.

  442. says

    Looking at the turnout numbers in South Carolina:
    – about 370,000 for the Democrats, compared to 532,000 in 2008
    – about 743,000 for the Republicans (a record turnout)

    Republican turnout has broken records in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina.

  443. says

    Marco Rubio is rolling out dick jokes against Donald Trump:

    “He’s like 6’2” which is why I don’t understand why his hands are the size of someone who is 5’2″. Have you seen his hands?” Rubio said during a rally in Roanoke, Virgina. “You know what they say about men with small hands? [pause] You can’t trust them. You can’t trust them.”

    Trump has been making fun of Rubio for sweating, so now Rubio added a sweat joke to his schtick:

    Trump doesn’t sweat cause his pores are clogged from the spray tan that he uses.

    Trump continues to dismiss Rubio with comments on his size: “Little Rubio,” “Little Marco,” etc.

    Is this really the Republican presidential primary?

  444. says

    Another school shooting:

    Three students sustained non-life threatening injuries and a suspect is in custody Monday after a shooting was reported at an Ohio high school.

    Cincinnati’s WCPO reported that three students were shot but all other students were safe at Madison High School in Madison Township, Ohio.

    The Journal-News reported confirmation from police that a suspect in the shooting was in custody.

    Journal News link.

  445. says

    West Virginia’s latest anti-science legislation:

    Beginning this summer, public school students in West Virginia were supposed to learn about human-induced climate change three times — in sixth-grade science, in ninth-grade science, and in a high school elective course on environmental science. […]

    […] the West Virginia House of Delegates voted last Friday to block new science standards from being implemented for at least another year, due to the fact that they mention climate change as a man-made problem. Proponents of the delay, which was introduced as an amendment to a larger education bill, argued that the new curriculum would have presented the science of climate change without properly reflecting both sides of the global warming debate.

    “In an energy-producing state, it’s a concern to me that we are teaching our kids potentially that we are doing immoral things here in order to make a living in our state,” Delegate Jim Butler, (R) told the Charleston Gazette-Mail. “We need to make sure our science standards are actually teaching science and not pushing a political agenda.” Butler also worried that the new curriculum would “expect students to believe” in global warming and “prove it with evidence.” […]

    Think Progress link.

  446. says

    “Climate change is real, it is happening right now, it is the most urgent threat facing our entire species, and we need to work collectively together and stop procrastinating.

    [The actor went on to ask for the support of] “leaders around the world who do not speak for the big polluters or the big corporations, but who speak for all of humanity — for the indigenous people of the world, for the billions and billions of underprivileged people who will be most affected by this, for our children’s children, and for those people out there whose voices have been drowned out by the politics of greed.” [excerpts are from Leonardo DiCaprio’s speech at the Oscars].

    More background on DiCaprio’s support for actions to address climate change:

    […] The actor heads the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, which is focused on conservation and climate and which donated $2 million to marine conservation efforts in 2014 and $3 million to wild tiger conservation in 2013.

    DiCaprio marched, alongside fellow actors Mark Ruffalo and Edward Norton, in New York City’s massive People’s Climate March in 2014. He also spoke at last December’s U.N. climate talks in Paris.

    “Climate change is the most fundamental and existential threat to our species. The consequences are unthinkable and worse, it has the potential to make our planet unlivable,” DiCaprio told an audience of mayors in Paris. “Our future will hold greater prosperity and justice when we are free from the grip of fossil fuels.”

    DiCaprio won an award for his efforts on climate change and other environmental issues at the World Economic Form in Davos, Switzerland in January.

    “We simply cannot afford to allow the corporate greed of the coal, oil and gas industries to determine the future of humanity. Those entities with a financial interest in preserving this destructive system have denied, and even covered up the evidence of our changing climate,” he said in his acceptance speech in Davos. “Enough is enough. You know better. The world knows better. History will place the blame for this devastation squarely at their feet.”

    Think Progress link.

  447. says

    More Oscar news with a political policy stance, and social justice message:

    Vice President Joe Biden introduced Lady Gaga, who performed “Til It Happens to You,” a nominee for Best Original Song. “Til It Happens to You” is the theme of The Hunting Ground, a documentary about sexual assault on college campuses, and Biden — who helped draft the Violence Against Women Act in 1994 — gave an impassioned speech imploring viewers to “take a pledge that says: I will will intervene in situations when consent has not or cannot be given. Let’s change the culture. We must and we can change the culture so that no abused woman or man, like the survivors you will see tonight, ever feel they have to ask themselves, ‘What did I do?’ They did nothing wrong.”

    Lady Gaga sang in her usual fashion, with every emotion cranked up to eleven. But the real power in her performance came from the phalanx of rape survivors flanking her on either side.

    Think Progress link.

    In addition to that focus on women’s rights, the Best Documentary Short prize went to “A Girl in the River: The Price of Forgiveness,” a film that focuses on honor killings in Pakistan.

  448. says

    Donald Trump compared himself to Gandhi, and he did it by quoting socialist leader Nicholas Klein, but falsely attributed the quote to Gandhi. “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

  449. says

    Rightwing doofus Jeffrey Lord defended Trump’s refusal to disavow the KKK by saying that David Duke is a leftist:

    […] Donald Trump isn’t playing the game, although he certainly denounced him. I mean, David Duke is a hardcore leftist. He’s an anti-Semite. Yes, Margaret, the Ku Klux Klan is a function of the left. It was the military arm of the Democratic Party. Hello? Donald Trump’s daughter and son-in-law are Jewish. David Duke is an anti-Semite, for heaven’s sakes. This is ridiculous.

    I agree with the last sentence. More details on the Media Matters site.

    And, regarding the KKK and the Democratic Party, see a previous discussion up-thread.

  450. says

    Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse sent an open letter to his fellow Republican Senators last night:

    I cannot support Donald Trump. I do not claim to speak for a movement, but I suspect I am far from alone. After listening to Nebraskans in recent weeks, and talking to a great many people who take oaths seriously, I think many are in the same place.

    Mr. Trump’s relentless focus is on dividing Americans, and on tearing down rather than building back up this glorious nation. Much like President Obama, he displays essentially no understanding of the fact that, in the American system, we have a constitutional system of checks and balances, with three separate but co-equal branches of government. And the task of public officials is to be public “servants.” The law is king, and the people are boss. But have you noticed how Mr. Trump uses the word “Reign” – like he thinks he’s running for King? It’s creepy, actually.

    That’s the first Republican Senator to jump off the Trump train, to essentially defect from the party if Trump is the nominee.

  451. tomh says

    @ #498
    I wonder where he’ll go when Trump is the actual nominee (which is looking inevitable). I can’t imagine he’ll support Clinton, let alone Sanders. I don’t think this is going to go well for him, either with his constituents or the party leaders.

  452. says

    tomh @499, Senator Sasse says he would prefer a third party alternative to Trump.

    In other news, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas broke a decade-long streak of never asking a question during oral arguments to ask several questions. The issue: taking gun ownership rights away from people convicted of domestic abuse. So, yeah, Justice Thomas seems to want to make sure that perpetrators of domestic violence can still have their guns.

    “Can you give me an area [of law] where a misdemeanor violation suspends a constitutional right,” Thomas asked of the federal government’s lawyer, who was arguing that a federal ban on gun ownership for certain persons who are convicted of domestic violence offenses at the state level should apply if the offense was committed “recklessly.” […]

    He wanted to know “how long” the suspension of Second Amendment rights was for persons prohibited under federal law to possess firearms, and he pressed Eisenstein to name any other legal analog where the federal government could permanently curtail constitutional rights following a conviction for an unrelated offense.

    Huff Po linkM/a>