Beautiful photo! I can tell PZ’s been working on a cladistics talk.
Loftysays
What use have mere worms of such beauty when there’s no creationist to gush lawdy talk all over them? Oh, yes, evolution throws up some fascinating creatures in places humans aren’t comfortable.
Of course, I came by just as I’m getting ready for bed.
Owlmirrorsays
Worm… Fish… Monkey…
Can’t you evilutionists keep your phylogeny story straight?
I, on the other hand, am the direct descendant of a man made out of dirt and his opposite-sex clone sister, made in the image of and by a nonphysical magical person.
You know it makes more sense.
Stacysays
Cool.
OK, can somebody who understands cladistics explain to me–under cladistics, are we all bacteria? (Or archaea?) If not, why not?
Of course, “worm” is the least-precise zoological category of all. We are no more closely related to these polychaete annelids than to cockroaches or squids.
Stacy: the origin of us eukaryotes from prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) is poorly understood and rather controversial. Probably eukaryotes resulted from the fusion of two or more very different prokaryotes, so it’s a unique situation not really comparable to the usual descent with modification. Cladistics don;t really apply very well in such a scenario.
Stacysays
@ChasCPeterson–thanks. I’ve been wondering ever since I read about cladistics in Colin Tudge’s The Variety of Life.
rqsays
I’m not quite as flamboyant
All it takes is more pink ribbons, PZ.
What a stunning worm!
Athywrensays
Is it just me, or is that worm quite clearly in the middle of a rousing chorus?
“Aaaaaaaaaaaah’m every worman, it’s all in meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!”
azhaelsays
Cladistics talk? Is it christmas already? We get to see that in youtube at some point, right?
Artorsays
Don’t feel bad PZ. With a feather boa and some disco pants, you could be as flamboyant as a Reap Paden photoshop with no trouble at all. That aside, could you please include some information with these fascinating critters you share? I’m sure you could offer a paragraph about some juicy tidbit of the worm’s life cycle, sexual habits, etc.
busterggisays
Oh no, that critter doesn’t fool me, I see those tentacles – it has ambitions to be a mollusk!
chigau (違う) says
prettypretty
and all, like, curly
MG Myers says
Beautiful photo! I can tell PZ’s been working on a cladistics talk.
Lofty says
What use have mere worms of such beauty when there’s no creationist to gush lawdy talk all over them? Oh, yes, evolution throws up some fascinating creatures in places humans aren’t comfortable.
Xanthë, Amy of my threads says
I see! *waves to Mary*
MG Myers says
*Waves back to Xanthë, Amy of my threads*
Gregory in Seattle says
Of course, I came by just as I’m getting ready for bed.
Owlmirror says
Worm… Fish… Monkey…
Can’t you evilutionists keep your
phylogenystory straight?I, on the other hand, am the direct descendant of a man made out of dirt and his opposite-sex clone sister, made in the image of and by a nonphysical magical person.
You know it makes more sense.
Stacy says
Cool.
OK, can somebody who understands cladistics explain to me–under cladistics, are we all bacteria? (Or archaea?) If not, why not?
Inaji says
Wow. Wow. More Wow. Spectacular all!
ChasCPeterson says
Of course, “worm” is the least-precise zoological category of all. We are no more closely related to these polychaete annelids than to cockroaches or squids.
Stacy: the origin of us eukaryotes from prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) is poorly understood and rather controversial. Probably eukaryotes resulted from the fusion of two or more very different prokaryotes, so it’s a unique situation not really comparable to the usual descent with modification. Cladistics don;t really apply very well in such a scenario.
Stacy says
@ChasCPeterson–thanks. I’ve been wondering ever since I read about cladistics in Colin Tudge’s The Variety of Life.
rq says
All it takes is more pink ribbons, PZ.
What a stunning worm!
Athywren says
Is it just me, or is that worm quite clearly in the middle of a rousing chorus?
“Aaaaaaaaaaaah’m every worman, it’s all in meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!”
azhael says
Cladistics talk? Is it christmas already? We get to see that in youtube at some point, right?
Artor says
Don’t feel bad PZ. With a feather boa and some disco pants, you could be as flamboyant as a Reap Paden photoshop with no trouble at all. That aside, could you please include some information with these fascinating critters you share? I’m sure you could offer a paragraph about some juicy tidbit of the worm’s life cycle, sexual habits, etc.
busterggi says
Oh no, that critter doesn’t fool me, I see those tentacles – it has ambitions to be a mollusk!
Pierce R. Butler says
Artor @ # 15 – click that “these worms” link.
cheesynougats says
@13,
Personal preference, but I imagine They Might Be Giants instead.
(I would link, but I live in fear of the anchor tag)
mothra says
If you scroll down rapidly while looking at the worm picture, it appear to be coiling. (the segments appear to move). Great optical illusion.