The dumbest poll yet


Look at this NASA photo of Pulsar B1509. Yes, it looks like a hand.

i-f6ad501027bdb70c6d90c2bec4384e81-pulsar_b1509.jpeg

It’s beautiful and fascinating.

Now look at the incredibly stupid poll the NY Daily News attached to it.

What do you think is captured on the recently released NASA photograph?

The hand of God 40%
A natural stellar formation 60%

My respect for humanity can only be restored if that 40% is reduced.

Comments

  1. JustaTech says

    Ach, it’s still 35%, 65%! Must click more! (And why doesn’t anyone ask these inane questions about the Horsehead nebula?)

  2. nigelTheBold says

    God has one serious-assed tumor on his forearm. He’d better have that looked at.

  3. Brian says

    Hand of God? Please. The photo is upside-down. Turn it upright, and it’s clearly Cthulhu.

  4. says

    Besides, there’s already a phenomenon called Fingers of God, so the digits are already spoken for.

    Maybe there’s just some interstellar mafioso thing going on where all these celestial beings are having bits cut off of them.

    I wonder who did what to deserve the severed Horsehead Nebula on their starry bedspread.

  5. Lynna Howard says

    Oh, for heaven’s sake! God lives on Kolob. That can’t be his hand. Voted, now at 70% for “natural stellar formation.”

  6. says

    Stupid? It’s actually the most intelligent poll ever on religion. See, this object, unlike many other object of religious veneration, actually exists. So, they’re stepping up their game. Good show! Plus, it really defines this God character. Apparently he’s a hand without a body. Who knew?

  7. says

    God has one serious-assed tumor on his forearm.

    Wouldn’t that be a case of corporeal tunnel syndrome?

    (inflammation, pain and suffering due to extended use of divine powers into the natural world)

  8. fenderplayer96 says

    I just voted, and it’s now

    Bronze-age superstition 25%

    Space-age knowledge 75%

    Getting there…

  9. says

    Some calculation. If the so-called spans 150 ly and is 17,000 ly far away, it is like having a 10 cm-hand at 11.33 m of distance. When I have a hand at such distance, I cannot fear being slapped. Moreover, the hand is only 1,700 years old. Even YECs accept Christ being born 2,000 years ago!

  10. Evie says

    ummm…I count 1 “thumb” and 3 “fingers” on that “hand”

    so…..if we’re supposed to be created “in God’s image” he seriously needs to learn how to count….he gave us too many fingers!!!

  11. says

    ummm…I count 1 “thumb” and 3 “fingers” on that “hand”

    so…..if we’re supposed to be created “in God’s image” he seriously needs to learn how to count….he gave us too many fingers!!!

    No it means that we have unequivocal proof that Homer Simpson is god.

  12. says

    #7 “I wonder who did what to deserve the severed Horsehead Nebula on their starry bedspread.”

    Horsehead Nebula = God’s Polyp

  13. cicely says

    The Hand of Snail, possibly. Seriously, when I look at the picture, my first impression is of a snail head, next the glowy red bug, and only then, fingers.

  14. Tark says

    Where did this hand crap come from? It’s obviously a leg, and foot with weird, red, misshapen toes. Bunions of the Lord be praised! Quite a nasty bone spur there below the ankle bone too.

    Methinks attending to this stupidity at all brings down our collectives IQ anyway … so lets get back to the bacon and lesbians, shall we?

    Tax Religion. Next up, poloroids of Gods spring break in Cancun…
    Tark

  15. Janine Of The Fixed Identity says

    No it means that we have unequivocal proof that Homer Simpson is god.

    D’oh! We’re all d’oomed!

  16. Dr.Woody says

    I hate to help restore any faith you might have had in humanity, but when I voted about a minute ago, it was HOG = 14%; Nat = 86%

    By the way, I thought it was an angel, but what do I know…

  17. raven says

    If that is the hand of god, he is either sleeping or dead.

    It’s been there for 1700 years, and will be there for thousands or tens of thousands of years more, very slowly…evolving. It is also thousands of light years away from us.

    I guess eveyone can sleep in on sundays and enjoy their life now.

  18. says

    Whilst it’s certainly not dog’s paw, it also not a natural stellar formation. It’s really a new New Galactic Builders housing development for up-and-starfaring families. The “fingers” are various stages of development ranging from the completed Phase I to the not-yet-started Phase VI. The “wrist” is the communal area, with numerous leisure, dining, and shopping facilities, and an underplanet starshippark.

  19. Ray S. says

    It just looks like a hand, and a malformed one at that.

    How is it that whenever one of these godbots sees an image they think looks like Jesus or Mary or whatever, they know what the original person looked like? I’m not aware of any images of any of the foundational characters of the Christian bible that date from the time of their purported existence.

  20. kennedy says

    This is not the hand of god, its the hand of a Greek God. It’s Apollo, this can be confirmed by viewing the TOS Star Trek doucumentary of the future episode Who Mourns for Adonis. Kirk and crew run in to this hand on Stardate 3468.1

  21. skyotter says

    i remember that episode of Star Trek. “Who Mourns for Adonis?”, i believe. thus, it’s obviously Apollo

  22. Naked Bunny with a Whip says

    It’s God’s hand? Why does God have four fingers, and — more to the point — who lopped that sucker off? Xians should be worshipping that badass.

  23. Inky says

    Methinks it looks like a supplicating hand reaching towards a giant cosmic bowl of spaghetti. All hail the FSM.

  24. Janine Of The Fixed Identity says

    Wait a second. If Homer is god, would that make Bart our savior? And where does Ned Flanders fit in? And what special powers does Marge possess, being the spouse of a deity?

    Do we pray facing in the direction of Springfield?

  25. Gregory Kusnick says

    ummm…I count 1 “thumb” and 3 “fingers” on that “hand”

    I see two thumbs and three fingers, with the thumb on the left pointing straight out of the frame at us.

  26. says

    That’s stupid, it’s the hand of Zeus, not Yahweh.

    We know that, because we saw it on Star Trek. OK, the finger count isn’t the same, but it’s a reduction, not an increase–we know God doesn’t cure amputees–so clearly he stuck his finger somewhere he shouldn’t. Maybe Zeus is teaching shop, now that he’s no longer believed.

    Glen D
    http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

  27. Epikt says

    It’s the downward-looking head of a dingo, wearing a lovely spring flower-bonnet.

    Which is on fire.

  28. says

    This is not the hand of god, its the hand of a Greek God. It’s Apollo,

    Oops, you beat me (damn Typekey), and yes, I’m sure you’re right that it’s Apollo. I don’t have a great knowledge of Star Trek.

    So ok, Apollo lost a finger since Kirk encountered him.

    Glen D
    http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

  29. says

    Wait a second. If Homer is god, would that make Bart our savior? And where does Ned Flanders fit in? And what special powers does Marge possess, being the spouse of a deity?

    Do we pray facing in the direction of Springfield?

    Bart is our Saviour, Ned is the devil and Marge can turn water in to bacon with her hair.

    And yes you must pray in the direction of Springfield, if you can figure out what state it is in.

  30. Amesthe149 says

    This natural stellar formation looks like a female hand slipping into some fiery brass knuckles.

  31. Citizen of the Cosmos says

    Wow that was fast. I’m always late to these polls, natural stellar phenomenon was at 90% when I voted just now.

    Hand of god? Really? I suspect most people who voted like that simply don’t think it really is the hand of god, instead they probably mean it shows the beauty of god’s creation or something equally silly. But still. We don’t know, it’s entirely possible that most of them really do think it’s the actual hand of an actual god. But that would just be dumb.

  32. Holbach says

    Good grief, step out for a while, and stellar formations take on all sort of delusions, the biggest being the moron who posed the question just to incite the retards among the afflicted. What responses would emit if that same image had been in a large pizza just fresh from the oven? Or perhaps a large cow turd that has cooled and formed?

  33. SEF says

    That poll should have included the hand of Star Trek (there was actually more than one episode like that!) and the hand of Harry Potter / Voldemort / ??? (for the youngsters).

  34. Richard Harris says

    Astronomers believe B1509 is roughly 1,700 years old and is located 17,000 light years from Earth.

    So if it’s the hand of god, & it’s over 18 000 years old by the time the light reaches here, what the heck was this god screwing around at for 12 000 years before creating the Earth? Maybe a Young Earth Creationist could explain?

  35. Josh says

    When I first look at this, it was before I saw PZ’s annotation; it looked like a cephalopod to me. Now I see it as a hand and I can’t get the damn cephalopod to come back!

  36. TimB says

    Sorry, but I have to go with hand of god on this one. That is definitely the hand of Dr. Manhattan. It’s big, it’s blue, what more proof do you need?

  37. speedwell says

    Could someone smarter than me please explain how it happens that we can see something 1,700 years old that is more than 1,700 light years away?

  38. sublunary says

    I saw this the other day on BA. I like his explanation – it’s clearly the hand of Dr. Manhattan.

    I’m also glad to see the poll’s now over 90% for common sense. Seriously, even if “hand of god” were a reasonable alternative, why the hell is it moving so slowly? Is that why he can’t heal the amputees? Too busy chasing gas clouds thousands of light years away from Earth?

  39. «bønez_brigade» says

    The anthropomorphized stupidity, it burns!

    Current poll percentages:
    gud’z fiddlin’ mano 8%
    natural nebulosity 92%

  40. says

    Could someone smarter than me please explain how it happens that we can see something 1,700 years old that is more than 1,700 light years away?

    At the time the light we are seeing now left the Pulsar, the formation was 1700 years old. But it was 17,000 light years away. SO the light we are seeing was of the 1,700 year old formation but it took 17,000 light years to get to us.

    Assuming someone didn’t make a mistake in recounting the facts.

  41. says

    They never give you the right choice.

    c. The beheading of a rooster. In outer space.

    Speedwell: That is easy. With the expansion of the universe, the light had less distance to travel earlier on in its journey. In a sense, the light cheated because as it ran its course, the ‘track’ got longer. So it starts running a 50 yard dash but at the end it is a 100 yard long track, but it was only that long during the last several yards.

  42. bastion of sass says

    God apparently thinks he’s going to impress us with his [ahem} awesome plate spinning skills.

    But…really…only one plate, and a relatively small one at that?

    And he needs to use all three of his fingers for his act…?

    Methinks God needs more practice.

  43. says

    No, wait. My explanation, while correct for certain things, does not apply here. I think the real answer is that the comma moved.

  44. says

    I can’t get the damn cephalopod to come back!

    Is a fecking BIG cephalopod. You don’t want it come back!

  45. Rev. BigDumbChimp says

    I think the real answer is that the comma moved.

    Or that someone writing that article had no clue about what they were talking about.

    Trying to find more reputable sources for those numbers.

  46. Andrés Diplotti says

    They forgot to say “mere”. As in, “is it the Hand of God or a mere natural stellar formation?” Geez, don’t they know how to use loaded language?

  47. cthulhu waters says

    Now that the pesky hand of god option is down to 8%, but there’s 92% of voters failed to have the intelligence and strength of character required to write in and tell them to add a “face of Cthulhu” option.

  48. Jason R says

    hmm…

    What’s he doing with his other hand? He’s a shifty little devil isn’t he.

  49. Qwerty says

    If only one finger was pointing out, would anyone think it was the hand of you-know-who?

  50. Pete says

    #80 – of course, to be more correct it should be something like, “is it an awesome natural phenomenon, or merely the hand of god?”

  51. Otto says

    Evie@19: “ummm…I count 1 “thumb” and 3 “fingers” on that “hand” ”

    Could catch: DOG is Goofy and has been created by Walt Disney!

  52. Josh says

    Is a fecking BIG cephalopod. You don’t want it come back!

    Oh dear, I hadn’t thought of that*. That’s a good point.

    *nod to Douglas Adams.

  53. says

    Over at Phill Plait’s Bad Astronomy blog, he has a great explanation of how this structure most probably formed. He does also keep the option open that it is Dr Manhattan’s hand though.

  54. Gregory Kusnick says

    #53:

    We don’t know, it’s entirely possible that most of them really do think it’s the actual hand of an actual god. But that would just be dumb.

    Yes, it would. But bear in mind that many Christians think of Heaven and Hell as actual physical places at opposite ends of the cosmic elevator shaft, with Outer Space (if they think of it at all) as a sort of junk-filled attic tucked in somewhere between Stratosphere and Purgatory. So an actual god poking his actual hand in there to rummage around (and getting caught in the act by NASA) may not seem all that far-fetched to them.

  55. bungoton says

    Anyone notice that the ‘hand’ has only 3 fingers? I guess it must be the hand of Mickey Mouse or some other cartoon character.
    Gotta go, time to pray to Mickey and ask for everlasting life or maybe to win a lottery.

  56. says

    Sorry to interrupt the flow here, but I found a suitable YouTube video for PZ.

    I’m a major otaku (anime nerd) and I’m terribly obsessed with the whole Vocaloid deal. They’re speech synthesizers designed for making JPop– you type in lyrics and melody and they sing. Each voice is given an anime-style mascot.

    Anyhow, this is the original vegetable juice dance (Po Pi Po) by Hatsune Miku:

    Weird, yeah, I know– but it’s sooooo addictive. Anyway, here is the same song as sung by another Vocaloid, Megurine Luka. Only she’s a cephalopod (in the video, not all the time). Yes:

    And there’s my “contribution” for today. Hehehe.

  57. Heaventree says

    I’ve done my duty. It’s obviously the Time Cube getting the shit squeezed out of it by God’s three-fingered hand. What could be clearer?

  58. Alexis says

    Bloody fingers, must wash again, of what foul crime dost this blood bespeak? Out, out damn spot!

  59. gwyllion says

  60. The pelagic argosy sights land says

    Wait a minute… it just dawned on me it’s blue. Surely, it’s the Hand of Papa Smurf, trying to catch hold of his red hat before it’s sucked into a black hole. Yep, that’s what it is, the number of fingers is about right, too.

  61. Silver Fox says

    Let’s transpose this into a counterfactual and say: If it is the hand of God, then what does that mean? Could we say that it is a mirror representation of Him having the “whole world in his hand? But all of that is speculative philosophy. How do any of us know what went on 10,000 years ago?

  62. says

    Following #26 and 37, I’m glad I’m not the only one who immediately saw a hand doing a little fingering.

    On the point of three fingers though, two possibilities. From my initial thought, all four fingers are there, but look at the spacing. God’s giving the shocker.

    Alternately, ring finger’s missing. It’s Jerry Garcia. The situation’s worse than we thought–the xtians aren’t right, the Deadheads are. We’re all facing an eternity in a crappy bar high on low-grade weed sitting next to someone relentlessly repeating, “but have you heard ‘New Minglewood Blues?’ I mean the lyrics, it’s so brilliant. Let me go through them with you again.”

  63. Nerd of Redhead, OM says

    Silver Fox, more inanities from you. PZ has plonked Pete Rooke and Facilis for stupidity, and I see you in his cybergunsights. Do yourself a favor and buzz off for a week or two, or you will likely meet the same fate. Now, it is up to you to show how intelligent you really are.

  64. Dr.Woody says

    Posted by: Naked Bunny with a Whip Author Profile Page | April 14, 2009 2:30 PM

    It’s God’s hand? Why does God have four fingers, and — more to the point — who lopped that sucker off? Xians should be worshipping that badass.

    There’s only one possible explanation.

    God’s a Yakuza…

  65. Desert Son says

    I was never able to see “The Man in the Moon.” I’m also lousy at those things where you have to squint and “see past” the image surface to figure out the sail boat in the otherwise dot matrix print. I like anthropomorphisation as much as the next person, but to make the leap to hand of god is pretty funny.

    1700 light years away at a different angle, and what would this thing look like? Probably not a hand. Probably not a Roman helmet, as I first thought.

    “I’m a centurion, toothbrush on the head.” -Eddie Izzard

    No kings,

    Robert

  66. daveau says

    “It looks like a hand of God reaching out into the cosmos, but scientists say it’s something just as incredible: electromagnetic energy pumped out by a neutron star.”

    I don’t think those 2 things are equally (in)credible.

  67. Doo Shabag says

    My first thought was “cool, it looks like a jellyfish!”

    A hand that looks like that probably requires some surgery.

  68. Pierce R. Butler says

    Oh no – He’s throwing a grenade at us! RUN!

    In the meanwhile, consider the intricate lines within this cosmic Hand. Since it’s generally agreed to be poor science to speculate outside of one’s specialty, shouldn’t NASA (or the Daily News, or Pharyngula) call in a Doctor of Palmistry?

    My respect for humanity can only be restored if that 40% is reduced.

    I hope never again to see on this blog criticisms of True Believers™ for contriving evidence to support their illusions.

    *scurries off to nearest foxhole*

  69. Menyambal says

    It’s the hand of a giant four-dimensional being, projecting into our three-dimensional space. It is ripping a hole in the very fabric of our space-time. Run awayyy!

    Astronomers believe B1509 is roughly 1,700 years old and is located 17,000 light years from Earth.

    I object to the word “believe” in there. Also, the “17”s get confusing. The distance of 17,000 light years is easy enough to understand. The 1,700 years old bit refers to the fact that anybody looking at it in 300AD would have seen it forming as a dot or spot or something.

    We can’t add the two, and say that it is “really” 18,700 years old, or anything like that. Albert Einstein could explain it better, but I understood him to say that distance equals time. There is no shortcut, there is no absolute “now”. That object is 17,000 light years away, AND it is only 1,700 years old. The “now” of it travels at the speed of light.

    Confused? Go ask Phil Plait.

  70. Ahcuah says

    I don’t like the choices in the poll. That’s not the hand of God. That’s the hand of my uncle Ernie–I recognized it immediately. Ever since he died he’s been pulling all these sorts of tricks, appearing on pieces of toast and turds in toilets.

  71. fatherdaddy says

    One comment said it looked like god going for a hot dog. I can’t get my mind off the porn idea, though. It looks like god is grabbing his divine member to me. Even god has to get in a little release every now and then. Does he even have a girlfriend since Mary?

  72. says

    Even god has to get in a little release every now and then. Does he even have a girlfriend since Mary?

    If he did we’d see a New New Testament as the existing new Testament was a direct result of him getting laid.

  73. Eileen says

    You can always tell when Pharyngualites strike a poll site. People probably create stupid poles just so we can crash them.

  74. Corgihound says

    Pulsar B1509??? 1509? 1509, as in the Year of the Great Istanbul EARTHQUAKE, referred to by contemporaries as “The Lesser Judgment Day?” Coincidence? I think NOT!

  75. «bønez_brigade» says

    @SASnSA [#86],
    That does look like a god-crab. So, maybe it actually is god’s amputated, yet broken, arm reaching to scratch at his fiery loin-lice with his hexadactylous hand.

  76. Lofcutus says

    Doesn’t anyone read intelligent literature? …that is obviously the hand of Alexander Luthor smashing realities together in order to create a perfect universe…How ever will Superman save us from this?

  77. 'Tis Himself says

    Looking more carefully, I see that’s the hand of god letting go of the burrito that’s been microwaved so hot that god can’t eat it.

  78. Pascalle says

    I always found it interesting how they got such pretty pictures of outer space stuff.
    My simple mind thought they were real pictures taken through a telescope.

    Last week i saw a documentary about it, and about the Hubble telescope and how it works. That sure was an eye opener :)

    Turns out the thing doesn’t see color at all. What happends is that it sees different materials it’s made off and temperatures.
    Than an artist gets a color pallet, and colors all the different stuff like metals, carbon, different gasses.

    And _than_ you get those pretty pictures :)

    So hand of god.. my ass!

  79. Russell says

    If this is the Hand Of God, I wouldn’t want to run into the guy He was arm wrestling.

  80. says

    If that is the hand of god creating a new universe does that mean he has given up on this one? END OF DAYS IS COMING! He will send his second son to save that galaxy as this one is swallowed up by evil!

    I’m glad I’m an atheist, I can’t wait for the rapture and all the loonies to be taken away.

  81. Menyambal says

    Just sent Phil an email to explain in his best astronomer-fu.

    Thanks, Rev. I have a severe cold right now, and probably shouldn’t be posting anything.

  82. fatherdaddy says

    Of course, that meant he got laid by Joseph Smith. I saw a t-shirt design that says “Every time you see a rainbow, God is having gay sex”. Is that why we’ve been seeing more rainbows around here?

  83. ExitB says

    I voted per your command, PZ, but I would have been happy to help vote it the other way just for fun.

  84. Wallace Turner says

    Assuming* it is indeed the hand of God, then God must be left handed because without any shadow of a doubt this is a left hand (try making a claw and getting your fingers coordinated the same way).

    Though naturally left handed myself, I am now ambidextrous. More than that, these days, I hold a pen exclusively in my right hand. This is because the nuns at the school I attended as a very young child pretty much brainwashed me into this; in their eyes left-handedness was seen as a sign of the devil. I was forced to write the right way.

    I think the nuns were wrong.

    It’s just a cool picure.

    * and also assuming this picture has neither been doctored or rotated 180 degrees.

  85. Kitty'sBitch says

    The birth of Christianity (God is a bragging frat boy)

    GOD: Y’know, what I did last night?
    ANGEL: I don’t know, created another beetle or something?
    GOD: I got laid.
    ANGEL: Oh, fuck right off…
    GOD: No, I’m serious.
    ANGEL: No fooling?
    GOD: No fooling. I just strolled down to Earth and picked up this chick.
    ANGEL: What was she like?
    God: Loud. She kept shouting my name at the top of her lungs. Oh God, yes God,set your feet and put some ass into it God. Smack it, God damn it, I said smack it.
    ANGEL: Sounds like she was pretty hot. Are you going to see her again?
    GOD: Naw, she’s married.
    ANGEL: Ah, that sucks… So uh…how…I mean, do you think you did well? I mean, do you feel like you performed well for a first timer?
    GOD: Are you kidding? I was so good that I redeemed humanity.
    ANGEL: Jesus Christ!
    GOD: Exactly.

  86. Wallace Turner says

    Of course, if it is the hand of God, then then it’s the definition of handball …

  87. Sauceress says

    #112 Silver Fox
    Let’s transpose THIS… “into a counterfactual and say: If it is the hand of God, then what does that mean?”

    Life’s Ingredients Detected In Far Off Galaxy
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080114110715.htm

    Please note the obvious Noodley Appendages/ Meatballs formation and read the accompanying information on ARP 220’s prodigious star birth activity, as well as the production of life forming chemicals!

    Could we say ARP 220 is evidence that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is responsible for creating Life, The Universe and Everything?
    RAmen

  88. says

    Reminds me of the loony who used to show up on Usenet and insist that a certain Hubble photo showed some biblical scene.

    I really find it difficult to believe that there are so many very, very stupid people around. Perhaps most people saying “The hand of God” have their tongue in their cheek.

  89. says

    “Astronomers believe B1509 is roughly 1,700 years old and is located 17,000 light years from Earth.”

    If it’s 17,000 light years away and 1,700 years old, how are we seeing it? Shouldn’t it take 17,000 years for the light from B1509 to reach us?

  90. Gregory Kusnick says

    #153:

    …without any shadow of a doubt this is a left hand…

    Only if you see the hand reaching away from you. If you Necker-cube invert it so it’s reaching toward you, then it’s a right hand (or as I said earlier, a symmetrical mutant hand with thumbs on both sides).

  91. frog says

    Does he even have a girlfriend since Mary?

    According to Family Guy he hooked up with “Janet” after Jesus was born, and often goes to bars to hook up with chicks. It appears that Janet requires him to use a condom — even on his birthday.

  92. amphiox says

    Alex #161:
    The structure as we see it is 1,700 years old. Since it is 17,000 light years away, that means were are seeing it as it was 17,000 years ago. Which simply means that the structure as we see it formed 18,700 years ago.

  93. «bønez_brigade» says

    @Olorin [#138],
    I counted six fingers on it. One of the thumbs could be a broken bone, though. The ring finger (or middle finger, depending on thumbage) is obscure, but a case could be made that it was possibly chopped off Sauron-style.

  94. DrClown says

    You know, to me… it actually looks like goatse from an odd angle. You can even sort of see the other ghostly hand on the opposite side.

  95. Aquaria says

    Silver Fox, if you value your posting privileges here, shut the fuck up. I would have tossed your ass before Pete Rooke, who was at least so creepy with his crazy that he was amusing. You, on the other hand are just a bore. A great big, oozing pus sac of a bore.

  96. scrabcake says

    It’s totally the hand of God. I mean seriously, how could that be a coincidence? You bunch are the types who deny the miracle of Grilled Cheese Virgin Mary.
    He’s even zapping some stuff into existence.
    It looks like a foetal hand, too with the skeleton thin fingers which are too short for the hand.
    I think that by allowing NASA to take this picture, God is telling us to protect the unborn from all those women who are queuing up to kill their babies so they can go sin.

  97. Tully says

    4% to 96%.

    The poll has been pharyngulated, oh master. What else would you have us do?

  98. Holbach says

    Despite the stupid crap associated with the photo of Pulsar B1509, it does not detract from the incredible feast for the eyes, and more mesmerising, the physics of which we will probably never discern. As I have said, Astronomy is a frustrating science. And one that harbors no celestial nonsense.

  99. says

    I have obviously been reading Pharyngula too long – my first thought – it looked like a Portuguese Man o’War (Physalia physalis)

  100. Abdul Alhazred says

    God is now down to 4%.

    For face-like apparitions identification is easy:

    Beard — Jesus

    No beard — His mom.

  101. jsoutofbiblepgs says

    My prediction when I first saw this picture was that a bunch of douchebag IDiots are going to exploit it for selfish religious purposes. Oh hey I was right (would anyone have doubted it?)

    If this is proof of God then God is a like a cartoon character – he lacks a finger. I guess God is so powerful he doesn’t need all the fingers.

    But isn’t it gorgeous and amazing? I set it as my desktop at work.

  102. AgnosticNews says

    The fool hath said in his heart, There is no great blue hand in the sky…

    Unrelated: Nice to meet you all.

  103. johnhill says

    PZ has become so feared by dispatching us, his evil minions, to freep these polls that half the time they’ve been shut down before I get there. Curses! (though this one was still up.)

    Command me, Master.

  104. Steven Dunlap says

    Well, I have a poster in my apartment called “The butterfly alphabet.” There exists so many species of butterfly that someone was able to find specimens that had in their coloration the shapes of the letters of the roman alphabet. In terms of probability, given millions of species, it happened. Now had it been the Chinese alphabet, that would have been a little more miraculous.

    In an infinite (or at least very very huge) universe, you’re going to see some shapes that coincidentally look like others. It’s a bit like the infinite improbability drive. It works on the basis that certain events are not impossible, per se, just highly improbable. But this was replace by a better inter-stellar drive running on “Bistro-math” a form of mathematics based on the existence of numbers on a waiter’s pad that exist no where else in the universe, for some reason this proves especially true when 5 diners attempt to sort out the check. Or is it 6? I can’t remember the details. Whatever.

    Also, don’t forget, you can understand the meaning of life, the universe and everything by studying the number 42.

    And BTW, as of 6:30 p.m. PDT the poll is running 94% sane to 6% people who believe nearly anything.

  105. Fiziker says

    Of course this is the hand of God! Yes, it’s the hand of God masturbating his large red nebula (if you know what I mean), but even He has His needs. The hand of God is the hand of God, regardless of the activity It’s doing.

  106. Scooter says

    Some atheists feel awe for the sublime beauty and wonder of nature. In comparison, they feel tiny and inconsequential.

    Some theists feel awe for the sublime beauty and wonder of God. In comparison, they feel tiny and inconsequential.

    Discuss.

  107. Hank Roberts says

    ” … and God said ‘Ouch! Dammit, that’s HOT’ and created Hell”

    The hand of God 4%
    A natural stellar formation 96%

  108. MadScientist says

    What a stupid poll – they left out the One True Choice – His Noodliness, the Flying Spaghetti Monstern at work.

    It’s certainly not a hand unless you consider ‘The Simpsons’ (and many other cartoons with human-like charcters) to be fact rather than fiction.

  109. Mary says

    Just voted and had to repost this comment from the comments thread under the article:

    “That’s the hand of the SPACE OBGYN checking space herself during her time of the month…”

    I don’t know if any of you wrote that, but it made me laugh so hard that the mouthful of tea I had is now splattered all over my computer screen.

  110. Mary says

    Just voted and had to repost this comment from the comments thread under the article:

    “That’s the hand of the SPACE OBGYN checking space herself during her time of the month…”

    I don’t know if any of you wrote that, but it made me laugh so hard that the mouthful of tea I had is now splattered all over my computer screen.

  111. vinraith says

    Speaking as someone who studies photoionized gas, if this is the hand of god I have some other parts of god I can show you. Disturbing parts…

  112. Headbhang says

    If that’s the Hand of God, what is it s/he is trying to reach for anyway? A fiery sky sausage? A smoldering cosmic turd? Or is that her Heavenly Vulva with her burning hot Divine Clit shining through?

  113. Jeff S says

    If god really existed I don’t think people would need to pretend that objects that vaguely resemble parts of the human anatomy (and not even accurately) were a part of their god.

  114. shamar says

    LoL, it’s no different than seeing jebus in a piece of toast, ha ha ha.

    You know, when I was a little kid, I saw something in the dark once in a while….I grew out of that though…….

  115. says

    Forgive my stupid, I’m no scientician but how can

    Astronomers believe B1509 is roughly 1,700 years old and is located 17,000 light years from Earth.

    be accurate? Now… I have a fever and I’m pretty high on pain killers right now, but that still doesn’t make much logical sense. If it’s 1,700 years old, wouldn’t we be needing to wait a further 15,300 years to be able to see it? My only other theory is that it formed 1,700 years ago, and it moved away really fast, which is complete rubbish.

    Help me out oh ye learned individuals, I’m totally confused.

  116. John Morales says

    Jake, that question is answered more than once upthread, first by RevBDC @70:

    At the time the light we are seeing now left the Pulsar, the formation was 1700 years old. But it was 17,000 light years away. SO the light we are seeing was of the 1,700 year old formation but it took 17,000 light years to get to us.

  117. MadScientist says

    @Mary: Space obgyn? Now why didn’t I see that in the introduction to Monty Python’s Meaning of Life?

  118. says

    Jake, that question is answered more than once upthread, first by RevBDC @70:

    At the time the light we are seeing now left the Pulsar, the formation was 1700 years old. But it was 17,000 light years away. SO the light we are seeing was of the 1,700 year old formation but it took 17,000 light years to get to us.

    Phil Plait emailed me back and told me that that is not necessarily correct but that explaining it would take way more time than an email would allow (or more likely he had to spare). The whole spacetime thing “distorts” our perceptions.

    Here is his brief answer to me.

    Now, you can argue that the star exploded 17,000 + 1700 years ago, but that’s a whole nuther can of relativistic worms that I’ll write about some day. I think it means the star blew up 1700 years ago, not 18700. But it’s too complicated to explain here.

  119. says

    Now, you can argue that the star exploded 17,000 + 1700 years ago, but that’s a whole nuther can of relativistic worms that I’ll write about some day. I think it means the star blew up 1700 years ago, not 18700. But it’s too complicated to explain here.

    Mmm… I think I see what he’s getting at. As a layman, this is the image I’m getting:

    One of the consequences of relativity is that there is no absolute time reference. The “speed” of time depends on the velocity of the object; as you approach the speed of light, time “slows” down. At the speed of light, time “stops”. So, this image of an event that took place 1700 years before (from it’s point of view) did take 17000 years (from our point of view) to get to us – but it’s still an image of event 1700 years ago.

    What I get as a mental picture is bubbles of time expanding. An event occurs – the “now” represented by that event in spacetime expands outwards, but at this “event horizon” (so to speak), it’s always “now”. I have this vision kind of like a pool of water in the rain – bubbles are constantly being created and intersecting with each other; each bubble is a new event in spacetime, and as it merges with other bubbles, the consensus “now” builds up, in an analogous way to how “solid” matter builds up out of the quantum foam of particles…

    (This is imagery, not physics, of course… and I’m probably way of base. But it’s still an interesting thought)

  120. says

    The “speed” of time depends on the velocity of the object; as you approach the speed of light, time “slows” down. At the speed of light, time “stops”. So, this image of an event that took place 1700 years before (from it’s point of view) did take 17000 years (from our point of view) to get to us – but it’s still an image of event 1700 years ago.

    Yeah I think that’s pretty much what he is getting at. Plus there are all other kinds of things to take into account such as the speed of “us” and the speed of B1509. Now I’m not sure what that does to the calculation but I have to think it does something.

  121. says

    Physics is not something I’ve spent too much time on but somethign I’ve been interested in learning more about (along with about a billion other topics). It’s pretty fascinating stuff obviously. Here is a link that looks to address the issue. I’m only a few paragraphs in but I think it will help answer a few questions on this.

  122. Cosmic Teapot says

    Beer and bourbon. Hic.

    A bourbon depth charge! Nice.

    For you ‘Murkin readers, you’ll know this as a boiler maker.

  123. cicely says

    Some theists feel awe for the sublime beauty and wonder of God. In comparison, they feel tiny and inconsequential.

    Discuss.

    Bacon. Wrapped around pork loin and grilled.

    But seriously..okay, I’m serious about the pork loin, but seriously about the topic you intend to be under discussion, IMO, they (specifically Christians, and probably the Abrahamic religions in general, here) are feeling awe and inconsequentiallity for the exact same things that athiests are, since their God may be everywhere and anywhere, but isn’t incarnate in a physical form; therefore they must be in awe etc. of the symptoms and side-effects of Godness/Creation, i.e., the world of matter and energy we all live in. “Wow, look at all this really awesome stuff! How much more awesome must the Manufacturer be!”.

  124. Scooter says

    therefore they must be in awe etc. of the symptoms and side-effects of Godness/Creation

    I just think both expressions of awe come from the same impulse; namely, the desire to feel something bigger than yourself.

    Of course, atheists are simply confronted with a natural world that dwarfs them. Theists have to create something that make them feel small.

  125. ??? says

    Besides, there’s already a phenomenon called Fingers of God, so the digits are already spoken for.

    What? God gave people the finger? Who knew?

  126. Bryn says

    There it is, you bunch o’ heretics–proof positive! J.D. Frazer is God! All of his “User Friendly” characters only have three fingers, this “celestial hand” has only three fingers. Q.E.D.

  127. NeilD says

    If you turn you head 33 deg to the left …. it looks like a cheese sandwitch…..

  128. Pieter B says

    Looks like the hand of Gawd coming to slap the shit out of people who do wack things in Her name.

  129. Rachel Wells says

    This silly story is also being reported in australia.

    Some douche wrote:

    ‘How very arrogant of man kind to think that God has a form similar to his own. Mans simple mind cannot fathom the essence of God. Surely God’s form is greater than some petty biped humanoid. Attributing these images is doing a grave injustice to The Almighty.”

    I replied:

    ”Attributing these images to god is doing a grave injustice to the Pulsar B1509″

  130. says

    I’m starting to think Prof. Myers might Himself be the earthly manifestation of God, or at least a minor deity. Have ye noticed how if He commandeth the results of a pollus stupidus to change, then yea verily, it will justly obey Him?

  131. says

    ‘How very arrogant of man kind to think that God has a form similar to his own. Mans simple mind cannot fathom the essence of God. Surely God’s form is greater than some petty biped humanoid. Attributing these images is doing a grave injustice to The Almighty.”

    Nice to see what he thinks of Jesus… from this I’m assuming that he’s a fan of the Christ-Raptor.

  132. says

    How very arrogant of man kind to think that God has a form similar to his own. Mans simple mind cannot fathom the essence of God. Surely God’s form is greater than some petty biped humanoid. Attributing these images is doing a grave injustice to The Almighty

    Gen. 1:27.

    So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

  133. 'Tis Himself says

    A bourbon depth charge! Nice.
    For you ‘Murkin readers, you’ll know this as a boiler maker.

    A boilermaker and a depth charge are not the same drink. A boilermaker is a shot usually of whiskey but sometimes vodka or tequila and a glass of beer. If you’re weird so inclined, you can pour the shot into the beer, but normal most people don’t. In New England a boilermaker is often called a shot and a beer.

    To make a depth charge, fill a collins glass about two-thirds full of beer, then carefully drop a shooter glass full of whiskey or vodka into the glass. This video shows how it’s done.

  134. «bønez_brigade» says

    Hey, check this. MSNBC mentioned the Pharyngulation of this poll!

    http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/15/1894075.aspx

    “At one point, 40 percent of the votes in the New York Daily News’ poll supported the idea the picture captured the hand of God, with 60 percent going with the view that it was a natural stellar formation. We all know that these polls are pretty unscientific to begin with, but over on the Pharyngula blog, “godless” evolutionary biologist P.Z. Myers crowned the Daily News’ effort as ‘the dumbest poll yet.’

    “‘My respect for humanity can only be restored if that 40 percent is reduced,’ Myers wrote.

    “Sure enough, the tally has now shifted to 96 percent for the natural stellar formation, and just 4 percent for the literal hand of God.”

  135. says

    Now that we know how large God’s hand is and assuming he created man in his image, we can get a pretty good idea of his size. Assuming that God created Adam 6′ tall (God hates short people) just how tall is God? What size sling shot would we need to take Him out?

  136. cicely says

    Scooter @ 222:

    I just think both expressions of awe come from the same impulse; namely, the desire to feel something bigger than yourself.

    Of course, atheists are simply confronted with a natural world that dwarfs them. Theists have to create something that make them feel small.

    I think that any human being who is not totally self-absorbed is, sooner or later, going to become aware of the overwhelming “bigness” of the world, whether they want to or not. The difference is that, while we are all looking out at the world, theists want to convince themselves that it is also looking back at them, that they matter, that the awesome totality of reality is aware of them. Anthropomorphize it, label it, attach attributes to it, and start hanging your personal desires and cultural baggage on in, and off we go.

  137. cicely says

    And, one of the more persuasive features of Christianity is that, not only is The Bigness aware of you, and watching you, it is watching over you, watching out for you. The Bigness is, in fact on your side. Therefore, how can you possibly lose!

  138. says

    dovestar:

    God has revealed Himself in the Scriptures and through His Son, Jesus Christ, Who gave His life to save us from certain judgement. Despite this unmeasurable love shown to us, this nation is hell-bent on erasing His Name and Presence from the public square. I seriously doubt that God, after having been treated this way despite His known revelation, would pose for your cameras.

    Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

    TRiG.