Now for the Daily Mail article itself. It’s damning.
On the other hand it – of course – makes some mistakes of its own, such as the headline for instance:
A very flawed accuser: Investigation into the academic who hounded a Nobel Prize winning scientist out of his job reveals troubling questions about her testimony
Nobody hounded him out of his job. He didn’t have “a job”; he’s retired; he had honorary positions.
Then there’s this in the body of the article:
Then, early this week, the simmering dispute took a further, seismic twist.