Marriage Farm: Cries of Persecution


Quiverfull founder and blogger Vaughn Ohlman.

Quiverfull founder and blogger Vaughn Ohlman.

Once denied permission to hold the retreat, Ohlman and the Quiverfull cult began to cry persecution, believing that people’s horror over the idea of marrying off children has more to do with Christian religion rather than the idea that children are neither physically or mentally prepared for marriage. It was also the girls’ lack of choice that enraged many, as Ohlman himself wrote that “there is no decision to be made once the betrothal is final. There is no approval required or veto allowed.”

Once the Quiverfull retreat was cancelled, Ohlman took to his blog to express his own disgust at the “left wing” media and “anti-Christian” sites that expressed disgust over the idea of children marrying.

“Well our main blog and my daughter-in-law’s blog have been picked up by Raw Story, Free Jinger, and a dozen or so more left wing and anti-Christian sites. Words cannot describe how much we appreciate their well thought out, pleasantly written, Biblical commentary on our various posts. They are especially impressed with our proposed ‘Get Them Married’ retreat idea.”

Ohlman then tries to claim that arranged marriage forced upon children, as advocated by the Quiverfull movement, is preferable to what else is offered.

“The government schools and other organizations charged with managing the sexual lives of our children seem to believe that our children should learn all about the joys of anal sex at five years old, and by twelve should be getting condoms out of vending machines, rolling in the sack with their partner of choice, and then (when the condoms fail) going out and murdering their children at taxpayer expense without even bothering to inform their parents.”

Ohlman’s blog has since become protected, but he did make previous claims that the Bible “provides many reasons for marriage, and most if not all of them demonstrate that marriage typically ought to happen in the youth (as in, before the age of 20).” But, Ohlman claims that he and his fundamentalist Christian cult does have limits — the children must be over the age of 11. They also have to have breasts.

There’s more at Inquisitr. It’s good to shine a light on such things, but the downside is that they will simply go further underground, but this practice won’t stop. I wonder, will any women be able to get out in the future?

Comments

  1. blf says

    The government schools and other organizations charged with managing the sexual lives of our children seem to believe that our children should learn all about the joys of anal sex at five years old blah blah blahh…

    Un-huh. What is the colour of the sky on yer planet?

  2. says

    Blf:

    Un-huh. What is the colour of the sky on yer planet?

    There’s no sky when you’re in a cave that deep.

  3. lorn says

    Well … of course the Bible would imply marriage before 20. Most people didn’t live to see 45 so you really had to start popping those babies out early. And yes, babies. Lots of babies. The majority of babies didn’t get to two years of age so you had to have three or four if you wanted any to make it to an age when they could have their own.

    Even multiple wives kind of makes sense for that time. In some locations and times it is thought that up to one in eight pregnancies ended up killing the mother. Having a spare seems to make some sense.

    What gets me is that while those standards made some sense in the first century … we don’t live in the first century. Average lifespan for a kid born today is well above eighty. While women do still do die in unacceptable numbers as a result of childbirth, it is a small proportion.

Leave a Reply