Obama addresses troops & nation on anniversary of bin Laden’s death


Moments ago President Obama addressed the nation from Afghanistan. Without the prop of mission accomplished banners and wearing no pilot costume, the President spoke to civilians, service members, and members of the House and Senate, commenting on our future timeline for ramping down the war in that battered nation (Mitt Romney celebrated the non-use of 9-11 and/or the bin Laden hit with a completely non political photo op surrounded by a company of fire fighters alongside former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani a few miles from ground zero). The President’s full prepared marks below the fold.

“Good evening from Bagram Air Base. This outpost is more than seven thousand miles from home, but for over a decade it has been close to our hearts. Because here, in Afghanistan, more than half a million of our sons and daughters have sacrificed to protect our country.

Today, I signed an historic agreement between the United States and Afghanistan that defines a new kind of relationship between our countries – a future in which Afghans are responsible for the security of their nation, and we build an equal partnership between two sovereign states; a future in which the war ends, and a new chapter begins.

Tonight, I’d like to speak to you about this transition. But first, let us remember why we came here. It was here, in Afghanistan, where Osama bin Laden established a safe-haven for his terrorist organization. It was here, in Afghanistan, where al Qaeda brought new recruits, trained them, and plotted acts of terror. It was here, from within these borders, that al Qaeda launched the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 innocent men, women and children.

And so, ten years ago, the United States and our allies went to war to make sure that al Qaeda could never again use this country to launch attacks against us. Despite initial success, for a number of reasons, this war has taken longer than most anticipated. In 2002, bin Laden and his lieutenants escaped across the border and established safe-havens in Pakistan. America spent nearly eight years fighting a different war in Iraq. And al Qaeda’s extremist allies within the Taliban have waged a brutal insurgency.

But over the last three years, the tide has turned. We broke the Taliban’s momentum. We’ve built strong Afghan Security Forces. We devastated al Qaeda’s leadership, taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders. And one year ago, from a base here in Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. The goal that I set – to defeat al Qaeda, and deny it a chance to rebuild – is within reach.

Still, there will be difficult days ahead. The enormous sacrifices of our men and women are not over. But tonight, I’d like to tell you how we will complete our mission and end the war in Afghanistan.

First, we have begun a transition to Afghan responsibility for security. Already, nearly half the Afghan people live in places where Afghan Security Forces are moving into the lead. This month, at a NATO Summit in Chicago, our coalition will set a goal for Afghan forces to be in the lead for combat operations across the country next year. International troops will continue to train, advise and assist the Afghans, and fight alongside them when needed. But we will shift into a support role as Afghans step forward.

As we do, our troops will be coming home. Last year, we removed 10,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan. Another 23,000 will leave by the end of the summer. After that, reductions will continue at a steady pace, with more of our troops coming home. And as our coalition agreed, by the end of 2014 the Afghans will be fully responsible for the security of their country.

Second, we are training Afghan Security Forces to get the job done. Those forces have surged, and will peak at 352,000 this year. The Afghans will sustain that level for three years, and then reduce the size of their military. And in Chicago, we will endorse a proposal to support a strong and sustainable long-term Afghan force.

Third, we are building an enduring partnership. The agreement we signed today sends a clear message to the Afghan people: as you stand up, you will not stand alone. It establishes the basis of our cooperation over the next decade, including shared commitments to combat terrorism and strengthen democratic institutions. It supports Afghan efforts to advance development and dignity for their people. And it includes Afghan commitments to transparency and accountability, and to protect the human rights of all Afghans – men and women, boys and girls.

Within this framework, we will work with the Afghans to determine what support they need to accomplish two narrow security missions beyond 2014: counter-terrorism and continued training. But we will not build permanent bases in this country, nor will we be patrolling its cities and mountains. That will be the job of the Afghan people.

Fourth, we are pursuing a negotiated peace. In coordination with the Afghan government, my Administration has been in direct discussions with the Taliban. We have made it clear that they can be a part of this future if they break with al Qaeda, renounce violence, and abide by Afghan laws. Many members of the Taliban – from foot soldiers to leaders – have indicated an interest in reconciliation. A path to peace is now set before them. Those who refuse to walk it will face strong Afghan Security Forces, backed by the United States and our allies.

Fifth, we are building a global consensus to support peace and stability in South Asia. In Chicago, the international community will express support for this plan, and for Afghanistan’s future. I have made it clear to Afghanistan’s neighbor – Pakistan – that it can and should be an equal partner in this process in a way that respects Pakistan’s sovereignty, interests, and democratic institutions. In pursuit of a durable peace, America has no designs beyond an end to al Qaeda safe-havens, and respect for Afghan sovereignty.

As we move forward, some people will ask why we need a firm timeline. The answer is clear: our goal is not to build a country in America’s image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban. These objectives would require many more years, many more dollars, and many more American lives. Our goal is to destroy al Qaeda, and we are on a path to do exactly that. Afghans want to fully assert their sovereignty and build a lasting peace. That requires a clear timeline to wind down the war.

Others will ask why we don’t leave immediately. That answer is also clear: we must give Afghanistan the opportunity to stabilize. Otherwise, our gains could be lost, and al Qaeda could establish itself once more. And as Commander-in-Chief, I refuse to let that happen.

I recognize that many Americans are tired of war. As President, nothing is more wrenching than signing a letter to a family of the fallen, or looking in the eyes of a child who will grow up without a mother or father. I will not keep Americans in harm’s way a single day longer than is absolutely required for our national security. But we must finish the job we started in Afghanistan, and end this war responsibly.

My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war. Yet here, in the pre-dawn darkness of Afghanistan, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over. The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home soon. We have a clear path to fulfill our mission in Afghanistan, while delivering justice to al Qaeda.

This future is only within reach because of our men and women in uniform. Time and again, they have answered the call to serve in distant and dangerous places. In an age when so many institutions have come up short, these Americans stood tall. They met their responsibilities to one another, and the flag they serve under. I just met with some of them, and told them that as Commander-in-Chief, I could not be prouder. In their faces, we see what is best in ourselves and our country.

Our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, coast guardsmen and civilians in Afghanistan have done their duty. Now, we must summon that same sense of common purpose. We must give our veterans and military families the support they deserve, and the opportunities they have earned. And we must redouble our efforts to build a nation worthy of their sacrifice.

As we emerge from a decade of conflict abroad and economic crisis at home, it is time to renew America. An America where our children live free from fear, and have the skills to claim their dreams. A united America of grit and resilience, where sunlight glistens off soaring new towers in downtown Manhattan, and we build our future as one people, as one nation.

Here, in Afghanistan, Americans answered the call to defend their fellow citizens and uphold human dignity. Today, we recall the fallen, and those who suffer wounds seen and unseen. But through dark days we have drawn strength from their example, and the ideals that have guided our nation and lit the world: a belief that all people are created equal, and deserve the freedom to determine their destiny.

That is the light that guides us still. This time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end. With faith in each other and our eyes fixed on the future, let us finish the work at hand, and forge a just and lasting peace. May God bless our troops. And may God bless the United States of America.”

Comments

  1. Trebuchet says

    OMG, he used the “N”-word — “negotiated”. Cue the Republican denuciations of Obama bin Laden in 3–2–1–

  2. timberwoof says

    “We devastated al Qaeda’s leadership, taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders.”

    I hate the euphemism “taking out”. It comes from “taking them out of the game”. It’s not a fucking game, nor a theater. It’s a war.

    “We devastated al Qaeda’s leadership, killing over 20 of their top 30 leaders.”

    That would be honest.

    I did like, “And we must redouble our efforts to build a nation worthy of their sacrifice.”

    In my mind, I saw Tom Hanks saying, “Earn this!”

  3. Aliasalpha says

    “our goal is not to build a country in America’s image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban. These objectives would require many more years, many more dollars, and many more American lives”

    Interesting that the cost is the objection he raises rather than something like it being morally wrong

  4. StevoR says

    @ ^ Aliasalpha :

    Are you saying eradicting the Taliban is immoral? Do you really know who the Taliban are and what they did?

    Do you think making a nation into something more akin to the United States with its values of freedom, opportunity, human rights for all is somehow a bad thing?

    Good speech by Obama. Not great, nothing that I think will go down famously in history or end up being quoted widely in pop culture but quite reasonable and measured.

    Without the prop of mission accomplished banners and wearing no pilot costume, the President

    In fairness to the other president, the one immediately before Obama, a flight suit is probably kinda required when flying aboard a fighter jet isn’t it? Would you even be allowed to fly in one wearing a business suit for safety reasons?

    Also that original mission – removing Saddam Hussein from power *had* been accomplished.

    The problem was the subsequent occupation once that was done didn’t go so well and hadn’t been properly, realistically planned for and ended up a huge mess to put it mildly at least in considerable part because of the behaviour and actions of the Iraqis themselves.

  5. StevoR says

    No big fan of either US President here. Bush was pretty bad inmany ways. Obama is better in most but not all respects and certainly still has his flaws.

  6. says

    Just imagine that the roles were reversed: a GOP president promised to go after bin Laden given half a chance and did so, while his chief democratic opponent waffled from the sidelines on whether he would violate the sheltering nation’s borders and then reversed himself despite having it on tape. Try that on for size and think what the Teaparty-Rove-Koch nexus would do with it?

  7. Aliasalpha says

    @StevoR

    Are you saying eradicting the Taliban is immoral? Do you really know who the Taliban are and what they did?

    Do you think making a nation into something more akin to the United States with its values of freedom, opportunity, human rights for all is somehow a bad thing?

    No, far from it. The bit I quoted read more to me like wanting to take over rather than helping overthrow the oppressors and then letting the people decide what they want

    In retrospect I should have excised the bit about destroying the taliban from the quote because that part was grand, it was the ‘making a country in america’s image’ part that felt a bit creepy & imperialistic

  8. KG says

    The speech was a load of dishonest crap. The reality is as follows:

    The US and foreign troops are propping up a corrupt and incompetent regime that is scarcely less misogynistic than the Taliban. Large swathes of both Afghanistan and Pakistan are under the control of jihadi movements. The occupying forces are widely hated by Afghans, and with good reason, considering the number of civilians they have killed. The Taliban know that they only have to wait until 2014 for foreign troops to leave, so they have no incentive to negotiate; meanwhile, they have the support of the Pakistani ISI, and get much of their armament from the Afghan army. Pakistanis overwhelmingly loathe the United States for its use of drones, and the contempt for them and their country that implies. Obama should simply have cut American losses, pulling out all troops as fast as logistically possible. That’s still what he should do now.

Leave a Reply