This debate was rowdier than the first with more occasions where speakers ignored the limits on time and moderators’ efforts to pick responders.
So here are my summary reactions followed by more substantive comments.
Those who gained: Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, Kirsten Gillibrand, Andrew Yang,
I knew something about the first before the debate and had a pretty good impression of Buttigieg but not so much about Harris. But all did well in answering questions, in that they were articulate and clear, particularly Buttigieg. I knew nothing about Yang but his call for giving every person $1,000 per month funded by a value added tax was interesting and deserves more attention. Gillibrand’s responses were also largely on point, refreshingly wonky at times, and seemed less canned.
Those who lost: Joe Biden, John Hickenlooper,
I am not a fan of Biden and tried to not let my bias influence my judgment but I really felt that he seemed flat. I did not know much about Hickenlooper and his distancing himself from socialism turned me off. I really do not know why Williamson is in the race at all.
Those who remained the same: Bernie Sanders, Marianne Williamson, Eric Swalwell, Michael Bennet
As I said yesterday, this is a tricky category that requires elaboration because staying the same in my estimation did not mean that I viewed them as the same. As with Warren yesterday, I already had a high regard for Bernie Sanders and that view remained unchanged because he was strong last night. I knew little about Swalwell and Bennet but their performances did not inspire me to know more.
[Read more…]
