Progressive gains strike fear into Democratic party leaders


Recent political developments have greatly encouraged progressives in the US and struck fear into the hearts of the Democratic party leadership. That leadership is pro-corporate, pro-war, and reflexively pro-Israel, not willing to say anything critical even as Netanyahu and the Israeli Defense Forces have gone on a genocidal rampage of unbelievable cruelty against Palestinians, committing war crimes left and right. It has come to a point where one does not need to dig up evidence of the crimes, each day’s news just provides yet more evidence.

The Democratic party leadership wants the energy and youthful passion of the progressives to campaign and vote for them but wants them to also then just shut up about the issues that they care about and let them govern. This was why Zohran Mamdani’s win was so remarkable. The corporate and Israel lobby threw everything at him while the Democratic party leadership either stayed silent on the sidelines or grudgingly supported him very late in the campaign or, in the case of senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, refused to even say whom he voted for, which clearly meant that he voted for the odious Cuomo against his own party’s nominee.

But Mamdani’s win was not the whole story even though it got the most attention. There was a blue wave all across the state.

A POLITICO review of results in 268 county, town and village executive branch races found an average 10 point increase in the Democratic margin.

Democrats made gains in at least 18 different county legislative bodies in November, flipping over 50 seats across the Empire State. They gained five seats in Oswego County, which Trump won by 27 points in 2024. They picked up five in Ulster by making inroads in towns that have been Republican for generations, winning their largest majority in county history. And they flipped five in Onondaga and gained their first majority there since the 1970s.

Democratic performance in places that were once untouchable Republican strongholds is perhaps more notable when looking ahead to next year. Consider, for example, the Rochester suburbs: Penfield elected a Democratic supervisor for the first time in four decades, Greece for the first time in 120 years, and Perinton for the first time since the Civil War.

Democrats also flipped mayoral or supervisor offices in places like Tonawanda, Oneonta, Monroe, Rensselaer, Johnson City and Riverhead.

All told, there were 118 municipal executive races outside of New York City this year that were contested in either 2021 or 2023. The number of ballots cast for Democrats grew from 1.3 million to 1.6 million, a 22 percent increase. The number for Republicans grew 1 percent to 1.6 million.

The lesson being drawn from these results is that Democrats win when they run progressive campaigns on issues like the affordability.

According to economist Matthew Nestler, the care economy has become one of the stickiest sources of inflation in the United States. Prices for home and community-based care have increased more than three times the pace of overall inflation since January 2024. In nearly all states, the cost of caring for children has outpaced even housing and health care, placing immense strain on families and the fabric of our democracy. 

For working parents — and especially mothers — the impact is devastating. Polling from the Century Foundation shows women are having a harder time than men finding good-quality jobs, largely because of care responsibilities and unaffordable options. Too many families are trapped between impossible choices: Stay home and lose income, or work just to pay for care.

Mamdani’s message to New Yorkers was simple: Care is a public good, not a do-it-yourself job. Across the river, Sherrill made the same case, showing that investing in care supports both families and the economy. In Virginia, where families pay an average of $30,000 a year for two children in child care, Spanberger tapped into bipartisan frustration over waitlists and unlivable costs.

Their victories demonstrate that care resonates because it shapes how families live, work and age. Child care enables parents to participate in the workforce and support their families. Paid leave gives workers and families the financial stability and time to lead healthy, flourishing lives. Home and community-based services allow older adults and people with disabilities to remain connected to their communities and live independently with dignity.

India Walton now regrets that she adopted the party’s conventional wisdom in her race for mayor of Buffalo. In 2021, she shocked the Democratic party establishment by defeating in the primary the centrist, party-backed incumbent mayor Byron Brown, by running on a progressive platform. But for the general election, she tacked to the center (really the right) because of the belief that that was what one had to do. But Brown mounted an independent campaign backed by establishment forces and defeated her. Walton feels that she lost because by changing course, she bled support from the very groups who had earlier actively supported her.

“Moderating is what got us here,” said Walton, now a senior strategist at RootsAction, referring to Donald Trump’s return to the White House. “I believe that moderating is what lost me ultimately the election in 2021.

“I pivoted fairly quickly … to try and integrate myself into the party, because I thought that was the way to build a broad-based coalition,” she reflected. “It sort of ate away from our message from the inside out.”

After initially opposing charter schools in the primary to win the Buffalo Teachers Federation endorsement, Walton later told business leaders she supported “school choice” – and lost the union’s backing for the general election as a result. She also distanced herself from the “defund the police” movement.

Shortly after Walton won the primary that year, the establishment and investor-aligned Brown mounted an unorthodox write-in campaign and won, even though his race was marked by possible campaign finance violations including receiving contributions from real estate corporations in defiance of election law. Brown, an ally of the former New York governor Andrew Cuomo and a former New York Democratic party chair, would step down in 2024 to serve as president and CEO of a western New York off-track betting company.

These results have been replicated elsewhere.

In the run-up to last month’s mayoral election in Dayton, Ohio, candidate Shenise Turner-Sloss found herself up against it.

Her opponent, mayor Jeffrey Mims, was a 78-year-old local Democratic party doyen who had served on school boards and teachers’ unions in the city for decades. His campaign budget was three times hers and an incumbent hadn’t been unseated from the mayoral role in the city for over a decade.

But it wasn’t just money and status that stood in her way.

In 2021, when Turner-Sloss ran for a seat on the city commission as a Democrat, the Ohio Democratic party mailed out an attack ad against her and another candidate that included the text: “Don’t Trust Shenise Turner-Sloss.”

And yet, on 4 November, 44-year-old Turner-Sloss ousted Mims, marking a sea change in how local politics are run in the Ohio city.

“My candidacy was not in opposition to anyone. My candidacy was to usher in a new generation of leadership,” she says.

From Detroit to Pennsylvania to Buffalo, New York, and here in Ohio, insurgent, progressive Democrats are defeating their long-established colleagues in dozens of school board, city council and mayoral races, throwing the already-divided national party into chaos, even as polls indicate it stands to potentially benefit at next year’s midterm elections due to the Trump administration’s divisive policies.

In Lancaster, Pennsylvania, one of seven swing states whose voters in recent years have decided the country’s presidential election, 37-year-old Jaime Arroyo was elected mayor on 4 November, becoming the first Latino mayor in the city’s 295-year history. In La Crosse, Wisconsin, another swing state, Shaundel Washington-Spivey, the city’s first Black and out gay mayor, beat a fellow Democratic party candidate with extensive local government experience last April.

The swing has been such that even in deep red Tennessee, Aftyn Behn, the Democratic candidate in a special election held today, lost by single digits, a margin of 54%-45%. At one point, the polls had her about two points behind her rival but she could not pull off what would have been a spectacular upset. Trump had won this state by 22 points just last year and Republicans have been concerned that a single-digit margin of victory for their candidate spelled problems for the party.

Democrat Aftyn Behn’s overperformance in the Tennessee special election — which attracted millions of dollars in spending and national attention in its final days — continues a trend of concerning electoral results for the GOP. Earlier this year, Democrats saw big overperformances in losses in other special elections in deep-red seats, and last month they swept a slate of critical off-year elections, including gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey.

“It was too close,” said one House GOP leadership aide, who was also granted anonymity to candidly discuss the race.

It is time for the Democratic party leadership to read the writing on the wall. They represent the past and should give way to the next generation. But you can be sure that they will not give up easily. For them, they more want to keep the money coming in from their usual supporters than actually winning elections on progressive issues that they do not support.

Comments

  1. says

    “Perinton for the first time since the Civil War” -- considering dems were the party of the kkk and racism from right after the civil war up thru the 1950s, sounds like perinton was pretty moderate until the southern strategy, actually.

    honestly i think this -- a commitment to the “moderation’ -- is why they sold the last election with nothing but doom, and it wasn’t a good seller, even if it was all true. they did not want to put themselves in a position where there’d be any real expectation they’d do progressive things, thought staving off destruction was good enough. one prob with that is we can all see how obama and biden were in a position to make strong moves against right wing radicalism and willfully chose to ignore it, for fear of offending the center-right, or because they themselves are center-right, or who knows why. because they didn’t take meaningful action to prevent “it” from “happening here,” it happened here. so more of the same did not feel good enough, in addition to the sense of hopelessness that doomselling instilled, demotivating from the polls.

  2. jenorafeuer says

    As Lawyers, Guns, & Money pointed out earlier today, the Tennessee district in the special election was the result of gerrymandering with the explicit purpose of chopping up Nashville across districts to remove the possibility of a Democrat winning in the area. Also, while special elections often have swings greater than general elections (because the turnout is lower and the ones most likely to turn out are the high-engagement voters and opponents of the incumbent), the turnout in this election was not as much lower as usual…

  3. birgerjohansson says

    Ever since Clinton, the Dem ambition has been “let’s be slightly less awful than the Republicans”. Also “let the Republicans set the agenda, like immigration, budget deficits, wars”.
    For some reason, it did not become the winning strategy they expected.

  4. garnetstar says

    I think that the current regime has brought the nation to such a pass that now people are in desperate situations, and know that they need desperate measures to fix them. By “despereate measures”, I mean progressive policies, which were formerly reviled as socialist.

    Food, housing, much of schooling, and of course medical care, are far too expensive for a great many people to even hope to afford. The job market is absolutely flat, no firing (mostly), no hiring. That’s a sign of “stagflation”, apparently, where the economy just stagnates, but there’s still inflation.

    I read that 22 states are already in recessions, though I can’t recall the source of that factoid and so can’t vouch for it. And, of course, that other states are getting there.

    So, in such desperate times, I think that more people wil grasp at those desperate measures, the progressive policies. Absolutely driving the country to the brink of destruction, and so making people desperate to back any new policy, was not exactly how I’d envisioned the US adopting more and more progressive policies, but, well, I can’t blame desperate people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *