It is a feature of despotic societies for the government to use unidentified paramilitary forces in unmarked vehicles to seize opposition people and protestors off the streets and take them to secret locations for questioning. Very often these people were killed and their bodies never recovered. These kinds of things were notorious in many Latin American dictatorships and around the world (Sri Lanka was another example where such squads operated with impunity during the civil war and the insurrection) and the calls by mothers to return the ‘disappeared’ became rallying cries.
Yesterday’s revelations of what is going on in Portland, Oregon have disturbing similarities to those events.
The US Attorney for the Oregon District on Friday requested an investigation into masked, camouflaged federal authorities without identification badges who are arresting protesters in Portland.
The request is aimed specifically at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) personnel who have been captured on various videos arresting protesters and putting them in unmarked SUVs.
…Oregon’s governor and Portland’s mayor demanded the troops be withdrawn and a US senator joined them in condemning the arrests.
“Authoritarian governments, not democratic republics, send unmarked authorities after protesters,” tweeted US Sen. Jeff Merkley, a Democrat representing Oregon.
Merkley also tweeted one video of such an arrest showing two masked, camouflaged individuals with generic “police” patches, detain a person dressed in a black outfit and place them in an unmarked van before driving away.
Authoritarian governments, not democratic republics, send unmarked authorities after protesters. These Trump/Barr tactics designed to eliminate any accountability are absolutely unacceptable in America, and must end. pic.twitter.com/PE4YfZ9Vqd
— Senator Jeff Merkley (@SenJeffMerkley) July 16, 2020
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) admitted to being one of the agencies involved in arresting protesters.
“Violent anarchists have organized events in Portland over the last several weeks with willful intent to damage and destroy federal property, as well as, injure federal officers and agents,” the agency said in a statement to CNN. “These criminal actions will not be tolerated.”
The problem of police brutality is bad enough when the people are identifiable. Anonymous security forces seizing people and taking them away to secret locations for questioning is a dangerous development.
WMDKitty -- Survivor says
The only violent anarchists I see are the ones in uniform snatching people.
StonedRanger says
I live in portland. Its not by mistake that I never go out without my concealed carry weapon. I wish fervently that I dont have to, but I have had too many incidents with people who have threatened me with bodily harm because I was fishing. My first thought when I heard what was going on was northern ireland or chile. Is death squads next? Is Trump such a madman that he would foment armed revolution as a reelection strategy? I am scared. I am 65 and my president is trying to kill me. First with his pathetic response to the pandemic and now grabbing people off the streets? Im getting too old to fight. But every day it seems that this government is pushing for one. Calling people who are painting up federal property violent is the start of it. This is how they marginalize the average person, by calling whatever it is they do ‘violent’. I wonder where our next Kent State will be and how many will die? Im an atheist, but god help us.
Marcus Ranum says
This is what all those 2nd amendment nuts wanted their guns for: in case the government turned on the people. But ((crickets))
sonofrojblake says
Question: if an armed citizen sees a member of the public being abducted by masked men not legitimately identifiable as law enforcement, are they justified in shooting the abductors? Surely they are? Otherwise what’s the point of being armed?
Marcus Ranum says
@sonofrojblake:
I think the point is that legalities and even common sense mean nothing. Point a gun at one of those guys and you wind up dead.
Someone should have shot the cop who was kneeling on George Floyd’s neck, but it would have resulted in more dead, and not saved Floyd.
Who Cares says
Can’t find the twitter message that showed the order (or guarantee it wasn’t a fake) but those violent anarchists? Graffiti artists. The damage? more the $5 000 to remove it.
The solution: Invoking the Insurrection Act and kidnapping random people from the streets.
sonofrojblake says
@mjr,5
“Someone should have shot the cop who was kneeling on George Floyd’s neck”
Well, yeah, but that guy was at least readily identifiable as a cop. These goons could literally be anybody.