When personal identity and politics collide


We have yet another case of someone acting against the interests of a group they belong to.

Former Republican member of Congress Aaron Schock came out as gay on Thursday in a long statement posted to Instagram and his personal website.

Schock spoke about his years of struggling with his sexuality and estrangement from his conservative family, and added that if he were in Congress now, he would “would support LGBTQ rights in every way [he] could.”

During his six years in Congress representing Illinois, Schock consistently voted against policies supported by the LGBTQ community, including the 2010 repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which allowed gay and bisexual people to openly serve in the military, and the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

It had been widely speculated that he was gay at the time he was a congressperson but we should not be too quick to judge and condemn Schock as yet another right-wing hypocrite. When he says that he was “struggling with his sexuality”, it is not clear whether his votes against providing justice to the LGBT+ community occurred during the time when he was in denial about his own sexual orientation and was trying to convince himself that he was not gay by going to the other extreme of overt homophobia. That condition is not that uncommon and reflects the sad fact that homosexuality still carries with it a stigma in many quarters.

But if he was cynically throwing the LGBT+ community under the bus and using those votes as a cover to hide his identity for the sake of advancing within the homophobic Republican party, then he deserves all the opprobrium he gets.

Comments

  1. Pierce R. Butler says

    Schock was (and maybe still is) a Republican -- he deserves all the oppobrium, period, exclamation point!

  2. says

    I used to wonder why the different parties had not attacked eachother by stealthing their agenda onto the other side -- i.e: sucking the oxygen out of democrats by running stealth republican candidates to obliterate trust in the system. Then, I voted for Barack Obama.

  3. bmiller says

    Marcus: To some extent your analysis is predicated on their being “different” parties. I see one party of Endless War and Catabolic Disaster Capitalism. The differences are just salad dressing on the side-the Democrats offer the sweet raspberry dressing of group identity politics and the republicans favor a bitter and sour oil and vinegar dose of heretical American fundamentalist religion. But it is the same three-day old wilted lettuce of F-35 programs and tax cuts for the vampire squids.

  4. jrkrideau says

    we should not be too quick to judge and condemn Schock as yet another right-wing hypocrite. When he says that he was “struggling with his sexuality”, it is not clear whether his votes against providing justice to the LGBT+ community occurred during the time when he was in denial

    Bullshit. If he was in de Nile then abstention on a vote was acceptable though contemptible. A complete failure to support basic human dignity and rights is damming whether he was straight, gay or fond of purple goats.

  5. jrkrideau says

    Re “fond of purple goats”: This assumes he was not frightening the horses.

  6. Holms says

    Oh, now he supports protections of alternate sexualities. Continuing the fine Republican trend of only supporting groups if and when there is a personal stake in that group, but otherwise telling them to fuck off.

    As usual, we see that empathy is the least Republican trait.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *