So, the Enquirer paid $150,000 to buy and spike a sex story about Trump?
I have opined, often, that the Russian interference with the 2016 election was not anything more than the 2 party system and the media already do. The fact that the press is patting itself all over its back for being all ethical and not reporting this stuff right before the election (because gotta respect those NDAs!) is ample demonstration of what I am talking about. So the Access Hollywood tapes were suppressed before the election, because of NDAs, and so was this stuff. The only difference is maybe the buyoffs were in dollars not Rubles.
The pee tape is real.
Did anyone ever doubt that it is real?
Now we know why he calls some news “fake news”
So, the Enquirer paid $150,000 to buy and spike a sex story about Trump?
I have opined, often, that the Russian interference with the 2016 election was not anything more than the 2 party system and the media already do. The fact that the press is patting itself all over its back for being all ethical and not reporting this stuff right before the election (because gotta respect those NDAs!) is ample demonstration of what I am talking about. So the Access Hollywood tapes were suppressed before the election, because of NDAs, and so was this stuff. The only difference is maybe the buyoffs were in dollars not Rubles.
PS -- I bet that for $1m in the right place, the pee tape would surface
@Marcus, No. 5
Larry Flynt has had a standing bounty of $1 million for months and $10 million for information leading to an impeachment.
So far no takers.
Cheers,
Jeff