Keeping track of the number of Republican presidential candidates


Yesterday Jeb Bush announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination for president. This may have surprised some since he seems to have been running for president for some time, creating Super PACs, raising money, hiring campaign staff, giving speeches, visiting early primary and caucus states, and all the other things associated with running. But this is American politics, where candidates start by first dropping hints, then forming what is known as an ‘exploratory committee’, and defer making an ‘official’ declaration for as long as they can to avoid being bound by campaign finance rules and to create suspense. So here is a summary of who is at what stage of the process.

There has been much discussion about the large number of Republican candidates. The actual number is even larger than I suspected. They can be split into three categories: officially declared candidates, those at the exploratory stage, and those who are potential candidates:

22 Declared candidates

There are actually 22 people who have declared their candidacy for the Republican nomination. Yes, you read that right, 22!

Of these, 11 are familiar names, at least to those who follow politics fairly closely: Bush, Cruz, Carson, Fiorina, Graham, Huckabee, Pataki, Paul, Perry, Rubio, Santorum. The other 11 are people who, as far as I can tell, have never held elected office before.

Some of the unknowns are pretty interesting, such as Michael Bickelmeyer who seems to be from the Cleveland area and definitely thinking pretty far outside the box

Bickelmeyer is something of a dreamer, and has formulated some creative inventions that are interesting, to say the least. He is particularly proud of three such ideas, which he advocates as important Federal Projects, and for which he is in the process of securing patents. The first is a square shaped airport with steam-heated runways and an industrial facility at the center. The industrial structure would be used for recycling, die casting, and manufacturing. His second proposal is an independent industrial recycling plant utilizing five high-volume furnaces, which would be used for the recycling of a variety of materials including glass, plastic, and steel. Crucially to Bickelmeyer’s platform, both of these facilities would be powered strictly via clean energy generation, producing no carbon emissions and thus no contribution to global warming.

The third of Bickelmeyer’s concepts is arguably the most noteworthy. In what he calls “a gift for children”, Bickelmeyer proposes an orbital weapons platform that would function by the collection of solar radiation, which would then be magnified and directed to the surface as a lethal beam. He claims that this weapon could potentially be as precise as to eliminate a single personal target, or as broad as to effect entire countries. Bickelmeyer advocates the use of this platform against terrorism and in pursuit of the war on drugs. He stresses that, because this is not a nuclear weapon, there is no danger of radioactive fallout.

Five at the exploratory stage

Then there are those who are still in the exploratory stage but haven’t officially declared. Four of them are familiar names: Christie, Jindal, Trump, and Walker, and then there is one other person named Lynch.

Five potential candidates

These are five people who have coyly dropped hints that they are interested in running but have not actually done anything substantive towards that end: Kasich, King, Ehrlich, Gilmore, Snyder.

So even if we look at only the familiar names, those who for one reason or another have managed to garner some media attention, there is a possibility of up to 20.

Comments

  1. busterggi says

    I’ve a pin from the 1940 REpublican campaign for Wilkie that reads, “No Royal Family”.

    Republicans have sure changed.

  2. Mano Singham says

    Oh, joy!

    Let the fun begin as this egomaniac lets fly at all the candidates in his inimitable style. If he does not make the cut for the debates, there will be fireworks.

  3. moarscienceplz says

    Yesterday Jeb Bush announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination for president. This may have surprised some since he seems to have been running for president for some time,

    This was very deliberate. I don’t fully understand the details, but a declared candidate can’t be involved with the operations of super PACs, or somesuch thing, while a “not yet” candidate can. This wink wink campaign allowed Jeb Bush (we should always strive to emphasize his last name, because he wants us to forget it) to skirt the tiny little shreds of campaign finance regulations we still have on the books.

  4. Holms says

    I never knew just how ridiculous and shambolic America’s election process was until reading this. Twenty-two candidates! For one party! With more on the way! Eighteen months in advance of the actual election!

    Oh and one of the candidates is Donald fucking Trump!

  5. says

    I’m finding myself wanting to resist the politics of familiarization generally. I don’t refer to any candidate of any party by first name alone. If I need to distinguish Clinton from the other Clinton, or Bush from the other Bushes, I use both first and last name.

    I have very warm feelings for Senator Sanders, but I refer to him that way, or just as Sanders, or as Bernie Sanders. We’re not on a first-name basis. I don’t call Hillary Clinton just Hillary, either. I am most definitely not going to call Jeb Bush just Jeb!

  6. Lassi Hippeläinen says

    moarscienceplz: “Jeb Bush (we should always strive to emphasize his last name, because he wants us to forget it)”

    Hard to forget it, because the B in JEB stands for Bush. John Ellis Bush.

  7. Mano Singham says

    Brian,

    Your instinct to avoid thinking of people by their first names is an excellent one because it helps us avoid being suckered by a sense of false familiarity. The legendary journalist I. F. Stone made it a deliberate policy of his to not get to know or socialize with public figures because he felt that it would dull the edge of his reporting.

    “It’s just wonderful to be a pariah. I really owe my success to being a pariah. It is so good not to be invited to respectable dinner parties. People used to say to me, ‘Izzy, why don’t you go down and see the Secretary of State and put him straight.’ Well, you know, you’re not supposed to see the Secretary of State. He won’t pay any attention to you anyway. He’ll hold your hand, he’ll commit you morally for listening. To be a pariah is to be left alone to see things your own way, as truthfully as you can. Not because you’re brighter than anybody else is — or your own truth so valuable. But because, like a painter or a writer or an artist, all you have to contribute is the purification of your own vision, and add that to the sum total of other visions. To be regarded as nonrespectable, to be a pariah, to be an outsider, this is really the way to do it. To sit in your tub and not want anything. As soon as you want something, they’ve got you!”

    In this he was the very opposite of today’s journalists who are thrilled to hobnob with the figures they cover and even attend the same social functions.

  8. deepak shetty says

    and for which he is in the process of securing patents. and which would then be magnified and directed to the surface as a lethal beam. He claims that this weapon could potentially be as precise as to eliminate a single personal target, or as broad as to effect entire countries
    Can he really patent something that Lex Luthor has created ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *