Grading day


All of my students are above average, and handsome, too

The students have survived their first genetics exam, everyone passed, hooray! Now I have to figure out went wrong in the problems they missed, and shore up their weaknesses in the next week.

First thing I notice is that they are rock solid on simple Mendelian genetics, but that’s not a surprise. Mendelian genetics is dead easy, which is why I have to roll my eyes when I see racists and eugenicists babbling out terms from high school genetics — it’s all the later, more sophisticated stuff that trips them up every time. Getting cocky about the basics is a sure way to fail when reality makes its ugly appearance.

What I really have to work on are probability and statistics. Some of the students are unclear on what a p value implies, and they’re getting tripped up by simple things, like the binomial theorem. I had no idea when I got my biology degree that I’d end up having to teach math!

(Really simple math, too. High school teachers, make sure your students are aware that biology is not a math-free discipline!)

Comments

  1. says

    No surprise there. Physicians mostly don’t know what a p value is and they don’t understand Bayes theorem. Actually, I would say that most people who do clinical research don’t understand the meaning of a p value, which by the way I would like to see a lot less of. Go with Bayes.

  2. birgerjohansson says

    Isn’t grading one of the most dull, soul-crushing element of teaching ? (my sister teaches chemistry)

    The upside must be learning about the progress of former students ( if they keep in touch).
    Anyway, I found math to be one of the more fun activities of university. But it helped if you had friends you could consult when you inevitably got stuck.

  3. Bad Bart says

    I often describe myself has having been a biologist who spent his day in front of a computer when that was unusual.

    The 80’s and 90’s utterly transformed the way approach biology. Speaking of an observation that is significant with a p-value of 0.05 is more accurate than saying “yes, it’s there”, but much harder for people to grasp.

  4. Dean Pentcheff says

    It was realizing that I really had to do a unit on exponential notation in the midst of a college senior-level biomechanics class that… um… gave me pause. 1.23 x 10^6 really is bigger than 4.56 x 10^3. Who knew?

Leave a Reply