Comments

  1. StevoR says

    As South Australians grapple with the loss of four women in separate and unrelated incidents over the course of one week, advocates are calling for change.Embolden, the state’s peak body for domestic, family and sexual violence services is calling for a royal commission to investigate gender-based violence in South Australia.

    The group and supporters rallied on the steps of parliament on Friday.

    Deirdre Flynn, from support service Catherine House, said a “battle” was underway.

    “Every person needs to go out in their community and ask each other ‘what can we do?'” she said.

    “I’m very worried about tomorrow, and the next day, and the next day.”

    Embolden general manager Mary Leaker said a royal commission was “essential” to shine a light on the experiences of those experiencing violence and abuse.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11-24/domestic-violence-prevention-advocates-call-for-royal-commission/103144028

  2. Reginald Selkirk says

    Terry Gou, the founder of iPhone maker Foxconn, drops out of Taiwan’s presidential election race

    Terry Gou, the founder of Foxconn – Apple’s main manufacturer of iPhones – has dropped out of Taiwan’s presidential race.

    He announced the decision on Friday, the final day for presidential candidates to register with the election commission.

    Gou’s withdrawal came after a breakdown in negotiations among opposition parties to form an alliance against the ruling party’s candidate, William Lai from the Democratic Progressive Party, or DPP…

  3. Reginald Selkirk says

    Republican Senate candidate’s family egg company caught in price-fixing plot

    The family farming company of a Republican candidate for the US Senate was found liable on Tuesday in a plot to fix the price of eggs.

    Rose Acre Farms, which claims to be the second-largest egg producer in the country and until September was chaired by John Rust – now running as a Senate candidate for Indiana – was accused in a civil suit of cutting supply to raise prices…

  4. says

    For the convenience of readers, here are a couple of links back to the previous group of 500 comments in The Infinite Thread:

    https://proxy.freethought.online/pharyngula/2023/10/09/infinite-thread-xxix/comment-page-3/#comment-2202512
    Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to publicly release thousands of hours of Capitol security footage from Jan. 6, 2021, has fueled a renewed effort by Republican lawmakers and far-right activists to rewrite the history of the attack that day and exonerate the pro-Trump rioters who took part.

    https://proxy.freethought.online/pharyngula/2023/10/09/infinite-thread-xxix/comment-page-3/#comment-2202545
    “When, exactly, as a society, did we decide that locking people up indefinitely was OK?

    Scroll around to find other interesting discussions, including lumipuna’s updates regarding Finland’s border with Russia.

  5. says

    The first 13 Israeli hostages were freed from Hamas captivity Friday as part of the captive exchange deal between Israel and Hamas; 39 Palestinian women and teenagers who were being held in Israeli prisons were released in exchange, according to a spokesperson for the foreign ministry of Qatar.

    Separately, Hamas also released 12 Thai nationals who were being held hostage.

    A pause in fighting in Gaza went into effect Friday morning — the first respite in seven weeks of war — as aid trucks entered the Palestinian enclave and people in southern Gaza ventured out, filling streets after weeks of fighting and Israeli airstrikes. Fifty Israeli hostages are expected to be freed over a four-day pause in fighting in exchange for 150 Palestinian prisoners in Israel under the agreement, which resulted from weeks of Qatar-mediated negotiations.

    […] The International Committee of the Red Cross announced Friday that it would work as an intermediary in the captive exchange deal between Israel and Hamas, transferring hostages held in Gaza to authorities in Israel and Palestinian prisoners to the West Bank. The ICRC will also bring medical supplies into Gaza, to be disbursed to hospitals in the besieged enclave.

    “The parties to the conflict agreed to the details of the operation, including who would be released and when,” reads the ICRC’s statement. “The ICRC was not involved in the negotiations, and its role is to help facilitate the agreement as a neutral intermediary.” […]

    Washington Post link

  6. says

    Right-wing protesters angered by a stabbing attack they believed had involved someone of immigrant background rampaged through central Dublin on Thursday night, leaving behind a trail of burning destruction.

    Ireland’s police chief on Friday described the unrest, in which double-decker buses, trams and police cars were torched, as “scenes that we have not seen in decades.”

    The violence and looting through some of Dublin’s most famous streets began after a stabbing attack outside a school that left five people hospitalized. They included three young children and a woman. Police detained a man who also is being treated for injuries.

    Rumors spread online that the perpetrator of the attack was an immigrant or had an immigrant background. The BBC, citing unnamed sources, said the man was an Irish citizen who had lived in the country for 20 years. […]

    Washington Post link

  7. says

    Russian and Chinese business executives with government ties have held secret discussions on plans to build an underwater tunnel connecting Russia to Crimea in hopes of establishing a transportation route that would be protected from attacks by Ukraine, according to communications intercepted by Ukraine’s security services.

    The talks, which included meetings in late October, were triggered by mounting Russian concerns over the security of an 11-mile bridge across the Kerch Strait that has served as a key logistics line for the Russian military but has been bombed twice by Ukraine and remains a vulnerable war target.

    The negotiations underscore Russia’s determination to maintain its grip on Crimea, a peninsula that it annexed illegally in 2014, as well as Moscow’s growing dependence on China as a source of global support.

    Constructing a tunnel near the existing bridge would face enormous obstacles, according to U.S. officials and engineering experts who said work of such magnitude, probably costing billions of dollars and taking years to complete, has never been attempted in a war zone. […]

    The project would also pose political and financial risks for China, which has never officially recognized Russia’s annexation of Crimea, and whose companies could become ensnared in economic sanctions that the United States and the European Union have imposed on Moscow.

    Nevertheless, intercepted emails indicate that one of China’s largest construction companies has signaled its willingness to participate. The messages were provided to The Washington Post by Ukrainian officials hoping to expose the project and China’s potential involvement. The authenticity of the messages was corroborated by other information separately obtained by The Post, including corporate registration files showing that a Russian-Chinese consortium involving individuals named in the emails was recently formed in Crimea.

    Emails circulated among consortium officials in recent weeks mention meetings with Chinese delegates in Crimea. One dated Oct. 4 describes the Chinese Railway Construction Corporation, CRCC, as “ready to ensure the construction of railway and road construction projects of any complexity in the Crimean region.” […]

    Washington Post link

  8. Pierce R. Butler says

    … an underwater tunnel connecting Russia to Crimea in hopes of establishing a transportation route that would be protected from attacks by Ukraine…

    So nobody in Russia or China has read any of the recent reports about Ukrainian agents allegedly blowing up the North Sea oil pipelines?

  9. says

    It does not matter that we have seen how things turn out in Britain, USA, Hungary and Dumbfuckistan .
    Some voters (a k a “low-information voters”) do not care about lessons from other countries.

    It’s even worse. Some people, especially those voting for the PVV and other populist right parties, are looking to those countries and saying, “yeah, I would like some of that as well.”
    Way too many people think a Nexit would be a swell idea. Way too many Trump-fans over here. Way too many people who think Orbán is right in denying LGBTQ+ rights.

  10. says

    Ukraine Update: Russia continues meat grinding around Avdiivka

    Another day, another massive claim of Russian losses by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense—1,100 men, 30 tanks, 30 armored infantry vehicles, and 31 artillery systems. Also important—32 fuel and cargo trucks. Ukraine’s suicide drones have been specifically targeting Russia’s logistics.

    Today wasn’t an anomaly. Yesterday, Ukraine claimed to have destroyed 1,130 men, 20 tanks, 36 armored infantry vehicles, 33 artillery systems, and 39 trucks. General mud and the onset of winter doesn’t seem to be slowing down the pace of attacks.

    We can assume the claimed numbers are exaggerated. The personnel numbers clearly included wounded, and can’t be anything more than a rough guesstimate in the best of circumstances. It’s doubtful even Russia knows the real number of its casualties. And in the past month of fierce combat around Avdiivka, the open source intelligence community has been able to visually verify less than half of the claimed armored vehicle kills, despite extensive drone and satellite footage of the entire battlefield. It is what it is.

    Still, the claimed numbers are useful as a barometer of intensity. And right now, we’re seeing some of the fiercest fighting of the war.

    A spokesman for one of the units fighting in the area claims that Russia has gathered 40,000 soldiers around Avdiivka for a final push into the town. I am skeptical of that number, as it is in Ukraine’s interest to exaggerate the number—it both adds urgency for further aid packages from its allies, while presenting a handy excuse if it becomes necessary to retreat.

    Yet this entire war, Russia has proven incapable of massing forces, and it wasn’t long ago that Ukraine claimed that Russia had over 100,000 soldiers massed near Kupyansk in the country’s north. The most Russia managed was a handful of insignificant villages in that approach, which Ukraine may or may not have retaken (as no one seems overly concerned about it).

    Russia has certainly attempted surprisingly larger-scale operations around Avdiivka, but they’ve been clumsy single-file approaches down easily targeted roads. This one was mid-October: [Tweet and video at the link]

    Another one a week ago: [Tweet and video at the link]

    Infantry small unit attacks continue, giving cluster munitions the chance to do their best work: [Tweet and video at the link]

    Ukraine reported another major armored attack yesterday, likely leading to Ukraine’s elevated kill claims. We don’t have video of that yet. But reports are trickling out of more of the same Russian meat-grinder tactics, and results, as we’ve seen the last six weeks. AFP reports:

    “The fields are just littered with corpses,” Oleksandr, (one name) a deputy of a Ukrainian battalion in the 47th mechanized brigade, told Agence France-Presse.

    “They are trying to exhaust our lines with constant waves of attacks,” he said. He did not provide his full name for security reasons.

    “The fields are just littered with corpses” is not an exaggeration, as you can see in photos and videos here, here, here, here, here, and here. [Embedded links are available at the main link] All the usual caveats apply. It’s gruesome stuff. Combat is bad enough, but just witnessing this is traumatic enough. Those drone operators dropping grenades and steering FPV suicide drones into other humans will have trouble sleeping for the rest of their lives. Ukraine will face a mental health crisis for decades.

    Here is the current map: [Map at the link]

    Orlivka, which I’ve circled, is the logistical lifeline for Avdiivka. That road running to its east has to feed Ukrainian defenses all the way through to its southeastern tip, surrounded on three sides most of the way.

    The author of this map, Andrew Perpetua, has marked six Russian air strikes in town, which is what Ukraine’s general staff claim took place yesterday. But the rims is where the action is happening, almost exclusively drone strikes from both sides.

    As of now, Russia is trying to encircle Avdiivka, or at the very least, bring that one last remaining supply road into town under direct fire control. Ukraine cannot hold the town without that lifeline.

    Still, Russia’s encircling attempts have created two salients of their own, both north and south of Avdiivka, presenting some tempting counterattack opportunities.

    Ukraine has long since given up using its armor for its operations in southern Ukraine. Both the Kherson and the Zaporizhzhia fronts feature mostly small infantry tactics today.

    As such, this is a great place for that armor to redeploy, as those Russian flanks don’t enjoy the kind of defensive structures that cover Ukraine’s south. Even if the “40,000” claim is real, it still requires Russia to expose a great number of its forces within easy flank attack. And lo and behold, we’re now seeing video of some of Ukraine’s best armor engaging in this fight.

    Here is a Leopard 2 in action: [Tweets and videos at the link]

    And here is an M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle in action: [Tweet and video at the link] Note how the Bradley deploys a smoke screen to mask its location, then uses its thermal sights to find its targets beyond it. (And as an aside, that smoke screen is white phosphorous, which is used by all armies to generate smoke screens. The use of white phosphorous for smoke is not prohibited by international law, and in fact, has an explicit carve out to those prohibitions. So when you see claims about white phosphorous regarding, ahem, another current conflict, they are bullshit.)

    Here, two Bradleys evacuate a squad, including wounded, at risk of being overrun. [tweets and videos at the link]

    Again, note the use of smoke to shield their position from the enemy.

    No one is pretending the situation at Avdiivka isn’t difficult, and as Russia closes the vice, there certainly appears to be an uptick in Ukrainian casualties from several weeks ago. But look at Perpetua’s map up above again—aside from the assault on the coke factory—Russia must attack across open fields. Those aren’t just getting muddier by the day, but they allow Ukraine’s drones, mine layers, cluster munitions, and rocket artillery to work effectively.

    Perhaps Russia can charge 40,000 men across those fields all at once, a la Braveheart, overwhelm Ukrainian defenses, and claim themselves some sort of victory. But it is far more likely that it continues to roll out hapless mobiks in waves, to be chewed up by Ukrainian defenses.

    Drones as literal infantry air support: [tweet and video at the link: "October 2023, Novomikhaylivka, Donetsk Oblast. Russians assaulting a Ukrainian trench, blocking the lads in a dugout. Coming to the rescue is a reserve group supported by a loitering drone. This saved the lives of all Ukrainians, although the position was eventually lost. Exclusive archive footage from the ground. 79th Brigade."]

    A brutal 33-minute uncut video of what war in the trenches around Avdiivka looks like: [Tweet and video at the link]

    Russian delivers drinking water to the troops, films it, and gives Ukraine everything it needs to wipe out the position. [Tweet, images and video at the link]

    I find the number of drones—20 in this case—interesting. It means Ukraine has the means to send swarms of them against targets.

  11. says

    All horse race, no substance: The nation’s major papers continue to endanger democracy

    When historians set out to determine why Donald Trump happened, from initial campaign to attempted coup to authoritarianism-premised comeback, the role of this nation’s press will be hard to overlook. In a piece published for the Columbia Journalism Review, five researchers who examined The New York Times’ campaign coverage leading up to the 2016 presidential election returned to similarly examine the 2022 race.

    [W]e did expect, or at least hope, that in the years that followed, the Times would conduct a critical review of its editorial policies. Was an overwhelming focus on the election as a sporting contest the best way to serve readers? Was obsessive attention to Clinton’s email server really justified in light of the innumerable personal, ethical, and ultimately criminal failings of Trump? It seemed that editors had a responsibility to rethink both the volume of attention paid to certain subjects as well as their framing.

    As any New York Times or Washington Post reader could likely tell you, the new results are just as dismal. Political coverage at even the largest and most consequential newspapers consists almost exclusively of horse race reporting and campaign gossip. Actual issue and policy examinations were nearly nonexistent.

    After the 2022 midterms, we checked back in, this time examining the printed front page of the Times and the Washington Post from September 1, 2022, through Election Day that November. As before, we figured the front page mattered disproportionately, in part because articles placed there represent selections that publishers believe are most important to readers—and also because, according to Nielsen data we analyzed, 32 percent of Web-browsing sessions around that period starting at the Times homepage did not lead to other sections or articles; people often stick to what they’re shown first. We added the Post this time around for comparison, to get a sense of whether the Times really was anomalous.

    It wasn’t. We found that the Times and the Post shared significant overlap in their domestic politics coverage, offering little insight into policy. Both emphasized the horse race and campaign palace intrigue, stories that functioned more to entertain readers than to educate them on essential differences between political parties. The main point of contrast we found between the two papers was that, while the Post delved more into topics Democrats generally want to discuss—affirmative action, police reform, LGBTQ rights—the Times tended to focus on subjects important to Republicans—China, immigration, and crime.

    By the numbers, of four hundred and eight articles on the front page of the Times during the period we analyzed, about half—two hundred nineteen—were about domestic politics. A generous interpretation found that just ten of those stories explained domestic public policy in any detail; only one front-page article in the lead-up to the midterms really leaned into discussion about a policy matter in Congress: Republican efforts to shrink Social Security. Of three hundred and ninety-three front-page articles in the Post, two hundred fifteen were about domestic politics; our research found only four stories that discussed any form of policy. The Post had no front-page stories in the months ahead of the midterms on policies that candidates aimed to bring to the fore or legislation they intended to pursue. Instead, articles speculated about candidates and discussed where voter bases were leaning. (All of the data and analysis supporting this piece can be found here.)

    If one set out to design a national press that would be most conducive to undermining democracy, you could hardly do better. In focusing on horse race coverage, campaign speculation, and the superficials of each race, the actual policy differences between each candidate are brushed aside.

    Even when the race features a conventional political figure paired against a coup-attempting alleged felon whose policy prescriptions call for the restructuring of government into a one-party, authoritarian-premised tool determined to bend the nation’s laws in unprecedented ways—as the 2024 presidential race will likely have it—the public cannot exercise its democratic rights if those differences are intentionally hidden from them. In ignoring the policy differences between each and every pairing of candidates, the nation’s press is hiding the stakes of each election. It is hiding the most existential of policy debates in darkness, shining a light instead only on candidate sound bites, gaffes, and infighting.

    In particular, the researchers call out the journalistic fiction of “objective” reporting. “What appears in a newspaper is less a reflection of what is happening in the world than what a news organization chooses to tell about what is happening—an indicator of values,” they write. And they emphasize that the papers are not being inaccurate in their reporting, but that coverage is “misleading” nonetheless.

    […] Words such as “objectivity” and “independence”—even “truth”—make for nice rhetoric but are so easily twisted to suit one’s agenda as to be meaningless.

    […] There has never been an American election in which the would-be beneficiary of an attempted coup came back, upon losing, to call for the indictment and imprisonment of his political foes, mass deportations and an end to birthright citizenship, and a purge of government to ensure only partisans loyal to himself can remain. It is a fascist manifesto—and you would not know it from the front pages, whose editors find such dangers to be no more important than whether his opponent is old, or analyses of how voters in Iowa are reacting to various campaign pitches.

    It is dreadfully dangerous. This is how democracies die.

    And the free press, as those same editors should know perfectly well, cannot itself survive in a nation that has decided it is addicted to the flash of political upheaval but indifferent to its consequences.

  12. birgerjohansson says

    NB
    (Klaxons going off, lights flashing).
    Holy. Fucking. Shit. This is BIG.
    🍾
    “Search algorithm reveals nearly 200 new kinds of CRISPR systems ”

    It is a pity Freeman Dyson is not alive to see this. More than two decades ago he predicted that the genome – together with the sun and the internet – would become the biggest driver of scientific and technological progress.

    https://phys.org/news/2023-11-algorithm-reveals-kinds-crispr.html

  13. says

    GOP’s long-term plan to kill public schools in America might be succeeding

    Not long ago, everyone agreed that public education was a value in this nation, much like the notion of a democracy. Yet just like with Republicans shifting attitudes toward democracy, more prominent Republicans are now openly disparaging the entire concept of public schools. Laura Ingraham claimed that “a lot of people are saying it’s time to defund government education or at least defund it by giving vouchers to parents.” Fox’s Greg Gutfeld similarly declared that private school vouchers are needed because public schools are “a destructive system” and described teachers as “KKK with summers off.”

    Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida has called public schools “a cesspool of Marxist indoctrination.” Donald Trump declared, “public schools have been taken over by the radical left maniacs.” And Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia called them taxpayer-funded indoctrination centers that need to end, which is a bit ironic since she is the poster child for the necessity of funding public education.

    Although Republicans have long held a disdain for public schools, only recently have they openly advocated for ending them. Like libraries, they are arguing that giving taxpayer money to educate people is a socialist concept. Thankfully, we have had a public school system for centuries, which makes it hard to destroy. However, the GOP has opened up a new front by starving public schools for funds while diverting the resources to charter schools, private institutions, and homeschooling without any of the standards that public schools must adhere to. After all, the biggest threat to their party is critical thinking and an educated populace.

    Conservatives have had a considerably extensive history fighting public education. School desegregation is what originally drove white evangelicals to become the strongest Republican demographic. Ronald Reagan promised to end the Department of Education in 1980, and every other GOP presidential candidate has been openly hostile to it. Possibly no Republican did as much damage as Trump, who put heiress Betsy DeVos in charge of the Department of Education despite having no background in education.

    […] DeVos was particularly terrible. She took the unique approach of actually advocating against federal funding for education. She attacked teachers, rolled back protections for minority students, and rewrote regulations to make it more difficult for sexual assault victims. Yet conservatives loved her precisely because she was a leading proponent of taking public school funds and funneling them to right-wing religious schools.

    Right now, red state legislatures are trying to do this through “school choice” reforms. Conservative states, like Florida, are burdening public schools with expensive requirements and taking money to give to unregulated charter schools. They defund schools while supporting a fast-growing sector of charter schools funded by right-wing billionaires to deliver indoctrination of their ideology. The money they take away from public schools cuts not just educational programs, but mental health funding to prevent violence, suicide, and drug abuse.

    Their plan looks like this: Parents are given a voucher for several thousand dollars that comes out of the state education budget. The money can be spent on tuition for charter or private schools, microschools (collective homeschooling), or regular homeschooling. Republicans say the “money goes to the kids.” In reality, it reduces money going to public schools to a point where the schools will be dramatically underfunded and collapse. That’s the point, according to Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers:

    Instead of coming together around solutions we know will help our students, some are unfortunately hellbent on destroying public education to advance both a political and school privatization agenda.

    Overwhelmingly, parents, educators and supporters of public schools are against this ongoing divisive rhetoric and against the systematic defunding of schools. But we must do more.

    States like Arizona, Florida, and Texas have aggressively pursued “school choice” reforms, undermining public school funding. Pennsylvania’s failed right-wing Christian nationalist candidate from 2022, Doug Mastriano, tried to eliminate property taxes, a significant source of school funding, and instead give families inadequate $9,000 vouchers. If his plan succeeded, it would have completely gutted funding for public schools.

    Vouchers for private schools simply aren’t a viable alternative for many families. They often fall short of covering the tuition costs at most private or charter schools, leaving parents with hefty expenses. Florida’s history with vouchers illustrates that poorer students promised a better education often end up in low-quality charter schools that eventually shut down, harming the students.

    […] Just this year, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law a sweeping bill that took money allotted for public school students and redistributed it to those who want to send their kids to private or charter schools. Thanks to the recent Supreme Court ruling in Carson v. Makin, which broke decades of precedent, religious schools now have access to public funds.

    Worse, there is no barrier for financial need, so the wealthiest parents in Florida who are already sending their children to expensive private schools get taxpayer money to do so.

    Some private schools responded by instantly jacking up their rates by thousands of dollars, which created a windfall of taxpayer funds for them but rendered the vouchers completely useless. They weren’t shy about doing it. Monsignor Robert Gibbons of St. Paul Catholic School said they needed to take “maximum advantage of this dramatically expanded funding source.”

    Meanwhile, the charter schools it went toward included schools that had high school dropouts working as teachers and even allowed that information to be kept from parents. Charter schools in Florida have essentially no rules; they don’t need to disclose curriculum, graduation rates, or where they spend their money. Public schools must do all of this, and are required to only hire teachers with degrees and certifications.

    In addition, public schools have strict requirements on what items can be purchased for learning supplies. If you take a voucher to not go to public school, however, you can buy everything from surfboards to theme park tickets as a legitimate expense.

    The right-wing grifts write themselves. […]

    Then there’s the legal discrimination issue. Public schools are required to admit everyone. Charter schools have flat-out refused to admit children with disabilities. Here in Florida, it’s both legal and disgusting. They have handbooks that say they’ll only accept students who can walk on their own and have no “limited intellectual functions.” Even when one family tried to offer payment for physical and occupational therapy, which they shouldn’t have had to do, the school told the parents they didn’t want the child.

    Also, this being DeSantis’ Florida, you can also deny children who identify as LGBTQ+. Charter schools even have handbooks that say if someone is discovered to live in a home with a “homosexual lifestyle,” that child will be expelled. These are just the policies that are written down. The treatment they receive that isn’t written down is worse. Parents have made disturbing complaints, according to the Orlando Sentinel:

    “Cleaning lady substituting for teacher.”

    […] “They don’t provide lunch and they don’t even have a place to eat.”

    “I don’t see any evidence of academics.” […]

    Not exactly what parents expected. Nor what most taxpayers want to hear about how public money is being spent.

    So how did Florida’s education department respond to these complaints?

    Well, the state won’t provide the public records that answer that question—unless the Orlando Sentinel coughs up more than $10,000.

    […] A propaganda outfit called Prager U, put together by firebrand Dennis Prager, is allowed to be used as an educational resource in Florida schools, so kids can learn that climate change is a hoax and systemic racism no longer exists.

    […] Everything in the U.S. has been viewed through a political lens, which is why we still can’t get benefits or social policies that exist in most other developed nations: universal health care, reliable public transportation, paid parental leave, and strong social safety nets. The one exception to this rule has always been education, where Republican and Democratic parents have been able to traditionally put aside ideological differences to support the needs of their children. Not long ago, teachers were regarded by everyone to be heroes.

    It’s not surprising since public schools serve 90% of America’s children regardless of socioeconomic status or religious views. Yet this new breed of MAGA Republican has upended everything. Now poor people are doing Republican billionaires’ bidding by calling for the destruction of public education, demonizing teachers, and being openly hostile to educating their children. This may be Trump’s worst legacy to date.

  14. says

    Actor and comedian John Leguizamo roasted Univision’s recent interview with former President Trump Tuesday.

    “I don’t know what’s more shocking, that Univision gave Trump a softball interview, or that Trump let a Latin guy into his house,” Leguizamo said on The Daily Show.

    […] Leguizamo heavily criticized what he said was a failure on the part of Univision to its Latino audience to “to fully report what a second Trump presidency could mean for them.” […]

    Link

  15. StevoR says

    When it comes to entomology, Australia IS NOT number 1 or anywhere near esp for the hymenoptera:

    Out of all the thousands of native species of bees in Australia, only about two-thirds have even been named. So it may be surprising that finding work to study and catalogue native bees is a tough slog for those in the industry. Native bee expert James Dorey, an adjunct lecturer at Flinders University, is about to move overseas, despite wanting to stay in Australia to study native bees.

    Dr Dorey said Australia was decades, or even “centuries behind” the United States when it came to native bee knowledge. “We really don’t know much about our bee fauna,” he said. “Even for the species we do have a name for, we probably know next to nothing about them.” … (Snip!)…Dr Hogendoorn said Australians needed to start looking past pollination when it came to bees.

    “The flavour of research is all crop pollination,” she said.

    “Australian native bees are on the whole are not important pollinators of our crops because they didn’t evolve with those crops, and if we want to know about those native bees, we shouldn’t be focusing on pollination.

    “When it comes to protecting a bandicoot, nobody asks what kind of important things this bandicoot does, it is just a native animal that is struggling and needs our support.” Dr Hogendoorn said the government needed to focus more funding on ecology and conservation research. “We can’t rely on volunteers and community groups and citizen scientists to start doing things when we don’t even know what species we have,” she said.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2023-11-25/australian-native-bee-research-funding-lacking-researchers-sa/103146584

    Despite Dex Hamilton alien entonmologist.. here & see also here : https://dex-hamiltonalien-entomologist.fandom.com/wiki/Dexter_Hamilton among other places.

  16. lumipuna says

    Update on the Finnish/Russian border situation.

    Predictably, since Finland closed nearly all border points on Thursday, asylum seekers have begun showing up at the one remaining border point in the far north. Three people arrived on Friday, and at least 50 today (the Raja-Jooseppi station is only open for a few hours a day, as there’s very little regular traffic). Polar night is just about to begin in the area, and temperatures are dropping below -20C after a couple days of milder weather.

    There are reports on Finnish media and the Barents Observer that the situation in Russia’s Murmansk region is confusing. This story was posted on Thursday:

    https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2023/11/governor-announces-regime-high-alert-murmansk

    Russian media has been increasingly exploiting the situation, blaming Finland for causing inconvenience for its own and Russian citizens, and potential peril for the desperate migrants. Naturally, there’s no discussion on why the migrants are so desperate to leave Russia behind them. By Tuesday, there had been some photo ops of migrants congregating in heated tents in southwestern Murmansk region while waiting entry to the Salla border station (which was still open at the time). Andrei Chibis, the regional governor, was raising alert on Telegram for the brewing humanitarian crisis. More details here:

    https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/borders/2023/11/murmansk-governor-humanitarian-crisis-unfolding-border-finland

    However, it seems that the local people in Russia’s remote northwest are suspicious on why hundreds of brown foreigners have suddenly appeared in the region. Aside from the sudden influx of migrants, everyone there knows that you can’t normally access the border area unless you have the documents needed for actually crossing into Finland. Chibis has apparently found that he needs to do (or pretend to do) something else besides blaming Finland. By Thursday, he started playing Tough on Security.

    In a meeting late Wednesday, the regional government decided to announced a ‘regime of high alert’ and said that “a series of additional security measures for our citizens” was established.

    According to Chibis, the new measures were instrumental in easing the situation. “The establishment of the checkpoints has stimulated the foreigners to return to their cars and go back,” he says in a video announcement. He also confirms that there on the 22nd of November were attempts by migrants to illegally “break through the border.”

    At the same time, it becomes clear that authorities in Murmansk plan to establish three reception points for migrants heading towards Finland. The centers will be located in Murmansk City and the towns of Kola and Kandalaksha, B-port reports.

    In the announcement, Chibis reiterates his verbal attacks on Finland. “Our main mission is to take all necessary measures to preserve law and order in the region, irrespectively of the unfriendly and provocative actions of Finland that has closed the border-crossing points.”

    All this is confusing, possibly garbled in translation. It’s unclear whether Chibis is pretending to stop illegal entry to the Finnish border (which is being machinated by the FSB) or illegal entry to the Murmansk region (the migrants seem to have valid “student” visas to Russia). On Friday, Finnish Yle reported (from the Murmansk authorities) that most (over 200) of the migrants stuck after Salla’s closing had “voluntarily” chosen to stay in Russia, and were supposedly being transported to St. Petersburg. How convenient that they voluntarily chose to get the fuck out of Murmansk region! Meanwhile, some 58 were reportedly being given a hike to the Raja-Jooseppi border crossing, and who cares if they have valid documents for entering Finland.

    Now, we’ll see if Chibis ends up in hot water if increasing numbers of new migrants continue to travel through the Murmansk region, either clogging or bypassing the supposed reception points.

  17. says

    Derek Chauvin Stabbed In Fed Prison

    Derek Chauvin, the former police officer convicted of murdering George Floyd, has been stabbed in federal prison, according to a source for the Associated Press.

    No other details are currently known about Chauvin’s condition or the precipitating events.

    Chauvin killed George Floyd during a stop over alleged counterfeit money in Minneapolis, after kneeling on his neck for nine minutes while Floyd struggled and gasped for help.

    The killing triggered a wave of protests around the country in 2020, and prompted discussions at the federal, state, and local level over police reform.

  18. says

    Ukrainian officials reported that Russian forces began a renewed offensive effort towards Avdiivka on November 22, although likely with weaker mechanized capabilities than in the previous offensive waves that occurred in October.

    High-ranking Russian officials may be engaged in a wider scheme of forcibly adopting deported Ukrainian children.

    Ukraine’s Western allies declared their commitment to further develop Ukrainian air defense capabilities during the 17th Ramstein Group virtual meeting on November 22.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin attended the Collective Security Treaty Organization’s (CSTO) Collective Security Council session in Minsk, Belarus on November 23 against the background of Armenia’s continued absence from recent CSTO events and exercises.

    Chinese businesses, including a prominent state-owned Chinese construction firm, are reportedly working with Russian businessmen to plan the construction of an underwater tunnel that would connect Russia with occupied Crimea.

    European states are responding to Russia’s continued orchestration of an artificially created migrant crisis on its northwestern borders.

    The Russian Strelkov (Igor Girkin) Movement (RDS) called prior Russian regional elections and the upcoming Russian presidential election illegitimate, likely in an effort to establish Girkin’s inevitable presidential election loss as a long-standing grievance.

    Russian law enforcement reportedly detained about 700 migrants at a warehouse in Moscow Oblast and issued some military summonses, likely as part of an ongoing effort to coerce migrants into Russian military service.

    The Kremlin is reportedly renewing attempts to control all video surveillance systems in Russia, likely as part of ongoing efforts to intensify its tools of digital authoritarianism to increase domestic repressions.

    Russian forces conducted ground attacks along the Svatove-Kreminna line, near Bakhmut, near Avdiivka, west and southwest of Donetsk City, in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area, and in western Zaporizhia Oblast and marginally advanced in some areas.

    The Russian aviation industry is likely under significant constraints due to international sanctions and demands from the Russian defense industrial base (DIB).

    The Russian occupation authorities continue efforts to indoctrinate Ukrainian children in occupied Ukraine into Russian national and cultural identities

    https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-november-24-2023

    More details:

    High-ranking Russian officials may be engaged in a wider scheme of forcibly adopting deported Ukrainian children. BBC Panorama and Russian opposition outlet Vazhnye Istorii published investigations on November 23 detailing how Just Russia Party leader Sergei Mironov adopted a 10-month-old Ukrainian girl whom Russian authorities forcibly deported from a Kherson City orphanage in autumn of 2022 alongside over 40 other children. The investigations found that Mironov’s new wife, Inna Varlamova, traveled to occupied Kherson Oblast, where occupation authorities issued her a power of attorney to deport two children—a 10-month-old girl and a two-year-old boy. Both BBC and Vazhnye Istorii noted that Varlamova falsely introduced herself to the leadership of the children’s home as the “head of children’s affairs from Moscow,” a position which she does not hold and that still would not legitimize the deportations of the children under international law. Russian court documents show that Mironov and Varlamova then adopted the girl in November 2022, changed her name from her Ukrainian birth name to a new Russian name and the surname Mironova, and officially changed her place of birth from Kherson City to Podolsk, Russia. Neither investigation could confirm the whereabouts of the two-year-old boy. Mironov notably responded to the investigation and called it a “fake from Ukrainian special services and their Western curators” meant to discredit him.

    Mironov and his wife, who reportedly holds a low-level unspecified position in the Russian Duma, follow in the footsteps of Russian Commissioner on Children’s Rights Maria Lvova-Belova, who has also adopted at least one Ukrainian child from occupied Mariupol. While ISW can only confirm that these two Russian officials have forcibly adopted deported Ukrainian children at this time, the adoptions may be indicative of a wider pattern in which Russian officials adopt deported children in order to legitimize the practice in the eyes of the Russian public. Russian politicians may be adopting deported Ukrainian children to set administrative and cultural precedents for wider adoptions of Ukrainian children to further escalate Russia’s campaign to deport Ukrainians to Russia. ISW continues to assess that the forced deportation and adoption of Ukrainian children likely amounts to a violation of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

    More details concerning migrants:

    European states are responding to Russia’s continued orchestration of an artificially created migrant crisis on its northwestern borders. The Finnish government announced on November 22 that Finland will close three more checkpoints on the Finnish-Russian border from November 23 to December 23, leaving only the northernmost checkpoint open. Norwegian Prime Minister Johan Gahr Store stated on November 22 that Norway would also close its border to Russia “if necessary.“ Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur stated on November 23 that an increased number of migrants have also arrived at the Estonian-Russian border and that Russia is organizing the arrivals as part of an effort to “weaponize illegal immigration.” Reuters reported on November 23 that the Estonian Interior Ministry stated that Estonia has undertaken preparations to close its border crossings with Russia if “the migration pressure from Russia escalates.” Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina stated on November 24 that Latvia has experienced a similar influx of migrants on its border with Russia, and Silina and Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo stated that these are Russian and Belarusian “hybrid attacks.” Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Maria Zakharova accused Finland on November 22 of “stirring up Russophobic sentiments” and interrupting border services that were an integral part of Russian–Finnish cooperation. ISW previously assessed that Russia is employing a known hybrid warfare tactic similar to Russia’s and Belarus’s creation of a migrant crisis on the Polish border in 2021 that is likely similarly aimed at destabilizing NATO.

  19. says

    Ukraine secures Black Sea grain corridor on its own, 100 ships have already passed — UA Minister

    Ukraine has independently established a grain corridor in the Black Sea, Vice Prime Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, Olha Stefanishyna, said during a briefing at the representation of the European Commission in Vienna on Nov. 23.

    Ukraine, without an agreement with Turkey, the UN, or Russia, has secured a Black Sea grain corridor on its own, stated Stefanishyna, quoted by Ukrinform news agency.

    “You probably know that Ukraine has ensured the grain corridor in the Black Sea on its own, not thanks to an agreement between Turkey, the UN, and Russia.”

    “So, we provided the ‘grain corridor’ ourselves, and the grain vessels are now liberated,” said Stefanishyna, adding that the United Kingdom has established a special insurance fund to ensure the corridor’s operation.

    […] The Ukrainian Navy on Aug. 10 announced new temporary routes for the movement of civilian vessels to and from Black Sea ports after the cessation of the grain agreement involving the UN, Turkey, and Russia in July.

    […] Russia is gradually losing control over the Black Sea and retreating to the eastern part of the waters, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced on Nov. 2.

  20. says

    Updates from The Washington Post:

    […] The Palestine Red Crescent Society said Saturday that 61 trucks of aid had been dispatched to Gaza’s embattled north, including Gaza City, describing it as the biggest aid convoy to that part of the enclave since the war began. The vehicles, which entered via the Rafah crossing with Egypt, carried food, water and emergency medical supplies, it said. Despite this, it added, “it is not enough as the needs are enormous.”

    […] Hamas will delay the release of the hostages set to be freed Saturday, its military wing said in a Telegram post, saying Israel must first allow agreed-upon aid into northern Gaza. The Hamas post did not elaborate on the demand, nor was it clear how long the delay could be.

    Relief groups had delivered some aid to the north, but not all areas were accessible. Hamas spokesperson Basem Naem told The Washington Post earlier Saturday that Israel had violated the terms of the agreement as “the aid did not reach the north” and “they didn’t abide by the standards of the release of Palestinian prisoners,” among other claims.

    […] After several digital blackouts in Gaza, Palestinian telecom provider Paltel said early Saturday its technical staff had reached north Gaza and was “working to contain and repair the damage within available means, despite extensive damage and difficult field conditions.” Netblocks, which monitors internet governance, said on X that there had been a jump in activity Saturday. […]

  21. says

    Updates from NBC News:

    Hamas said it is delaying the second round of hostages from being released over allegations that Israel violated the four-day cease-fire agreement.

    In a statement shared with NBC News, Hamas highlighted three terms of the cease-fire agreement Israel has violated — insufficient aid, Israel not releasing prisoners in the agreed-upon order and violence in northern Gaza.

    Hamas said it is delaying the second round of hostages from being released over allegations that Israel violated the four-day cease-fire agreement.

    In a statement shared with NBC News, Hamas highlighted three terms of the cease-fire agreement Israel has violated — insufficient aid, Israel not releasing prisoners in the agreed-upon order and violence in northern Gaza.

    […] A Qatari operations team landed in Tel Aviv today to “ensure the deal continues to run smoothly, and discuss further details of the ongoing deal,” a diplomat told NBC News today. Earlier, Hamas accused Israel of violating the truce. […]

  22. tomh says

    WaPo Opinion:
    Why are U.S. courts afraid of the 14th Amendment? Because it’s radical
    By Sherrilyn Ifill / November 24, 2023
    Sherrilyn Ifill, a visiting professor at Harvard Law School, will launch the 14th Amendment Center for Law & Democracy at Howard Law School in 2024.

    Why are U.S. courts so determined to dilute the 14th Amendment?

    Consider the recent ruling upholding former president Donald Trump’s appearance on Colorado’s 2024 presidential ballot. Here we have the latest entry in a dismaying 155-year tradition of American judges stripping that radical amendment to the U.S. Constitution of its intended power.

    Judge Sarah B. Wallace’s decision that Trump engaged in insurrection but is nevertheless qualified to run for office is emblematic of the often outright resistance courts have shown to the 14th Amendment’s guarantees and protections. This instance applies to Section 3, which bars any participant in a rebellion against the government of the United States from holding public office. But almost from its inception, all the amendment’s radical provisions have inspired fear and timidity in jurists of every stripe.

    I use the word “radical” deliberately. The 14th Amendment was conceived of and pushed by the “Radical Republicans” in Congress after the Civil War. They were so named because of their commitment to eradicating slavery and its vestiges from American political life. A number had been abolitionists, and all had seen the threat that white supremacist ideology and the spirit of insurrection posed to the survival of the United States as a republic. Although the South had been soundly defeated on the battlefield, the belief among most Southerners that insurrection was a worthy and noble cause, and that Black people — even if no longer enslaved — were meant to be subjugated to the demands of Whites, was still firmly held.

    The 14th Amendment was meant to protect Black people against that belief, and the nation against insurrection, which was understood to constitute an ongoing threat to the future of our country. Frederick Douglass, the formerly enslaved abolitionist who rose to become one of the most prominent voices of the Reconstruction period, had no illusions about the persistence of the “malignant spirit” of the “traitors.” He predicted that it would be passed “from sire to son.” It “will not die out in a year,” he foretold, “it will not die out in an age.”

    It was of this understanding that Section 3 was born….

    The language is clear: “No person shall … hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States … shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same.”

    William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, widely respected conservative constitutional legal scholars, have combed through the legislative history to answer the question of whether the president is to be considered an “officer of the United States.” Their exhaustive research points inexorably toward the conclusion that Section 3 is meant to cover both the president and vice president, as well as other federal and state officials…

    Wallace’s decision is of a piece with courts’ frequent unwillingness to contend honestly with all the radical demands of the 14th Amendment. During Reconstruction and the first half of the 20th century, it was the Supreme Court that left unprotected Southern Black people seeking to vote and engage in the political process in the face of deadly violence by White mobs seeking to disenfranchise them (United States v. Cruikshank, 1875). It was the Supreme Court that held that the 14th Amendment did not protect Black citizens from discriminatory conduct by private actors (Civil Rights Cases of 1883). And it was the Supreme Court that endorsed a system of Jim Crow segregation (Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896) that essentially nullified the 14th Amendment for Black people in the South for nearly 100 years after its ratification. Later, the court created onerous burdens to prevailing in discrimination cases brought under the 14th Amendment.
    […]

    The 14th Amendment is treated as a suggestion but rarely imposed in full measure when the status quo will be upended. This was perhaps most famously on display in 1955, in the case of Brown II, when the Supreme Court undercut its majestic decision of a year earlier in Brown v. Board of Education, by hedging on the immediate end to segregated schools and counseling instead that local officials should move with “all deliberate speed.”

    The Colorado court’s approach to Section 3 continues this tradition. To find that a president incited a violent insurrection against the United States but hold that such a president can still run for public office — indeed to return to the presidency itself — could not stand in starker opposition to the words and spirit of Section 3.

    The 14th Amendment has once again proved too bold for the judges empowered to interpret it. Political forces are at play again, this time fearful of a backlash if Trump is removed from the ballot. As this case makes its way through the appellate process and, most likely, to the Supreme Court, it should be understood in the context of how the timidity and unwillingness of judges to acquiesce to the judgment of the 14th Amendment’s framers effectively derailed our democracy’s promise after Reconstruction and until the mid-20th century. We must ensure that it does not do the same in the 21st.

  23. birgerjohansson says

    Some lighter reading for the weekend:
    -After consuming lots of alcohol , LazerPig and Falcon sit down to design the armoured vehicle of the future, capable of wiping out anything the Russians field in Ukraine.
    (lots of in-jokes from online debates about military tech)
    https://youtu.be/-7bbdt6ptDA
    I especially liked the ground-support Zeppelin.

  24. Reginald Selkirk says

    Right-Wing Activist Chris Rufo Calls for “Siege” of University at UT

    It wasn’t a cakewalk for Chris Rufo.

    The right-wing thought leader delivered a smooth and articulate call to “lay siege” to the nation’s system of higher education at UT’s Republican donor-funded Salem Center on Nov.13. But by the end of the Q&A, a trio of university professors had neutered his message.

    Who is Chris Rufo? He’s an enormously influential and connected conservative activist (he has counseled Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis) who has helped popularize some of the most successful right-wing propaganda of recent years. He is credited with initiating the controversy on the right over critical race theory. He helped pass the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, a Florida ban on teaching or even discussing gender issues in public schools. Lately, he has turned his attention to higher education, advocating for legislation like SB 17, the new Texas law that bans diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in the state’s public colleges and universities…

    “I just want to be honest with you,” Baker said, “your rhetoric in relation to barbarism and the way you smugly say that the university is not going to like what’s coming – I think that in the context of the world right now, where there is a lot of really tragic violence, that we ought to be careful to remove ourselves from that and from groups with white supremacist associations. I really think you should rethink the glibness.”

    By “white supremacist associations,” Baker was referring to reports linking Rufo to the figures who constitute a new alt-right bro culture, including the recently disgraced Richard Hanania – a visiting professor of the Salem Center who was, in his words, canceled after revelations that he’d written pseudonymously for white supremacist publications a decade earlier. Rufo also associates with anti-democratic voices like Bronze Age Pervert, as well as people from the Claremont Institute, who advocate for the overthrow of the 2020 presidential election, and Charles Haywood, an extremist who has called for a war of extinction against the left through his “No Enemies to the Right” philosophy. (Haywood is speaking at a far-right conference in Austin next month, by the way.)

    Rufo responded to Baker’s remarks directly: “Well, well – be straightforward. What are you saying? You’re alluding, you’re insinuating –”

    “That you hang around with fascists?” Baker replied. “Is that what you’re insinuating I’m insinuating?”

    And there it was…

  25. says

    Ukraine Update: Ukraine aid was complicated, now it’s tangled up in border security, by Associated Press for Daily Kos

    As war and winter collide, a top adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy acknowledged during a recent visit to Washington that the days ahead “will be tough” as his country battles Russia while U.S. support from Congress hangs in the balance.

    President Joe Biden’s nearly $106 billion aid package for Ukraine, Israel and other needs sits idle in Congress, neither approved nor rejected, but subjected to new political demands from Republicans who are insisting on U.S.-Mexico border policy changes to halt the flow of migrants.

    Linking Ukraine’s military assistance to U.S. border security interjects one of the most divisive domestic political issues — immigration and border crossings — into the middle of an intensifying debate over wartime foreign policy.

    When Congress returns this coming week from the holiday break, Biden’s request will be a top item on the to-do list, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. Failure risks delaying U.S. military aid to Kyiv and Israel, along with humanitarian assistance for Gaza, in the midst of two wars, potentially undermining America’s global standing.

    […] What just a year ago was overwhelming support for Ukraine’s young democracy as it reaches for an alliance with the West to stop Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion has devolved into another partisan fight in the United States.

    Members of Congress overwhelmingly support Ukraine, embracing Zelenskyy as they did when he arrived on a surprise visit last December to a hero’s welcome. But the continued delivery of U.S. military and government aid is losing favor with a hard-right wing of Republican lawmakers and with some Americans.

    Nearly half of the U.S. public thinks the country is spending too much on aid to Ukraine, according to polling from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

    Rather than approve Biden’s request, which includes $61 billion for Ukraine, Republicans are demanding something in return.

    Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has said the “best way” to ensure GOP support for Ukraine is for Biden and Democrats to accept border policy changes that would limit the flow of migrants across the border with Mexico.

    “It’s connected,” he said in an interview with The Associated Press.

    To that end, a core group of senators, Republicans and Democrats, have been meeting privately to come up with a border policy solution that both parties could support, unlocking GOP votes for the Ukraine aid.

    On the table are asylum law changes pushed by the Republicans that would make it more difficult for migrants to enter the United States, even if they claim they are in danger, and reduce their release on parole while awaiting judicial proceedings. Republicans also want to resume construction of the border wall.

    Democrats call these essentially nonstarters, and the border security talks are going slowly. Those who have worked on immigration-related issues for years see a political disaster in the making for all sides — Ukraine included.

    “I think it’s terrible that we’re in the position we’re in,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn.

    “But you know, we were talking all through the night and talking all day today,” he said recently, “trying to find a path forward.”

    […] The White House has requested roughly $14 billion for border security in its broader package, with money for more border patrol officers, detention facilities and judges to process immigration cases. It also includes stepped-up inspections to stop the flow of deadly fentanyl.

    Biden and his national security team met recently with key senators of both parties. With Congress narrowly split, Republicans holding slim majority control of the House and Democrats a close edge in the Senate, bipartisan agreement will almost certainly be required for any legislation to advance.

    Pentagon funding for Ukraine is rapidly dwindling. The Defense Department has the authority to take about $5 billion worth of equipment from its stockpiles to send to Ukraine, but only has about $1 billion to replenish those stocks. So military leaders are worried about the effect on U.S. troop readiness and equipping.

    The need for an infusion of funding is growing “by the day” said Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh.

    Overall, half the $113 billion Congress has approved for Ukraine since the war began in February 2022 has gone to the Defense Department, according to the Congressional Research Service. The dollars are being spent to build Ukraine’s armed forces, largely by providing U.S. military weapons and equipment, and replenish U.S. stockpiles.

    Much of the rest goes to emergency and humanitarian aid and to support the government of Ukraine through the World Bank.

    National security experts have watched the Ukrainian forces repurpose outdated American equipment that was headed for decommissioning and use it to obliterate aspects of the Russian armed forces. McConnell has noted that much of the spending stays in the U.S., flowing to defense production in states across the nation.

    “Ukraine is at a critical point,” said Democratic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. “The Russians are just counting on us to give up and walk away — and then they walk in.”

    […] Yermak, during his talk in Washington, was thankful for U.S. support, and blunt about the need for more.

    “I tell you the truth, this winter will be tough for us,” he said, urging Americans to back Ukraine at this “historical moment for all of us.”

    Posted by readers of the article:

    Our media treats Ukraine with the same horse-race mentality that they apply to elections — there’s no right or wrong, just differing perspectives. Unfortunately for us and for Ukraine, one of the prevailing perspectives is that Russia should be allowed to invade and conquer Ukraine, Budapest Memorandum be damned.
    —————————
    The Republican Clown Car Caucus just needs a favor or two.
    They’re just continuing Trump’s extortion.
    Same as it ever was.
    ———————————–
    It’s time to expose the fact that the GOP does not want to work on issues of immigration.
    It’s one of their best fear mongering talking points since they refused to pass the 2013 Comprehensive Immigration Reform bill.
    If the GOP wants this border security money, pass the funding for it.
    It’s also time people of all countries demand our world leaders start solving the issue of all the migration going on around the world. People need somewhere to go without going through hell and back.
    ————————————
    Republicans never solve any issue that they can instead use to further radicalize their base, because nobody will throw money at a con artist like a mark on tilt will eagerly do. And these days the entire GOP is marked and on tilt.
    ————————————-
    If Republicans want to tie border funding increases to Ukraine Aid, I can swallow that. But the Republicans are asking for wholesale changes to how America accepts refugees, trying to make it harder for people fleeing persecution based on sexual orientation or gender discrimination.

    My wife was an immigration attorney for many years, and one of the ways in which she was able to get people to stay here legally was for them to be accepted as refugees who were attacked on the basis of their gender.

    For example, she had clients who were targeted as “prizes” for gang members, who had been gangraped and subjected to intense violence and threatened with death, only to escape to the United States from Guatemala and other central American countries.

    She was able to obtain refugee status for some of her client if she was able to prove that her client had been targeted due to her gender—that is, she was viewed as property by gangs because she was a woman which subjected to her to provable acts of violence, persecution and verifaible threats of death (like death threats recorded on her cell phone).

    She had clients like this who were as young as 13.

    Republicans want to put an end to this, basically making political persecution the only avenue for refugee status.

    To say this makes me angry doesn’t even begin to describe how I feel about GOP immigration policy.

  26. whheydt says

    Re: birgerjohansson @ #43, 44…
    You know….you can test the links while you’re still editing a post.

  27. KG says

    The North Atlantic Fella Organization is trying to shut down Trump’s flailing social media platform before the 2024 election—by shitposting… – Reginald Selkirk@33 quoting wired.com

    But will the shit they post even be noticed among all the shit Trump and his worshippers post?

  28. Reginald Selkirk says

    ‘Straight through the bushes’: Google Maps misleads Californians into the desert during dust storm

    When a group of Californians went to enjoy the recent Formula 1 race in Las Vegas, they weren’t expecting to go off-roading on the way back.

    Shelby Easler, her brother Austin and their significant others were headed back to Los Angeles on Nov. 19 when they used Google Maps. Instead of taking the Interstate 15 — the major highway connecting Southern California to Sin City — the app suggested they take an alternate route to avoid the dust storm that caused major Sunday traffic delays…

  29. says

    The Washington Post is very worried that American women don’t want to marry Trump supporters

    In an editorial published last week, titled, “If Attitudes Don’t Shift, A Political Dating Mismatch Will Threaten Marriage,” the Washington Post’s editorial board points out that political polarization in this country has reached the point where it is now a prominent, often decisive factor in determining who Americans settle on as their potential mates. They emphasize this trend is now so acute it may actually threaten the institution of marriage as a whole. In particular, it seems that Democratic women are rejecting potential Republican suitors not only for marriage but as relationship material, all across the board. The message the editorial conveys — perhaps hyperbolically, perhaps not — is that as a consequence of this shift in attitudes marriage itself in this country is in jeopardy.

    Presumably the Post’s editorial board has a good reason for alerting us to this phenomenon. But what it doesn’t bother to do is tell us “why” it is occurring, and if what the editorial portends is true, Americans would be well served by knowing “why.” Had the Post bothered to provide some basic context, explaining that young American women, in particular, are loathe to date right-wing (presumably Republican) men because they find some specific views, attitudes and values they represent to be abhorrent — in fact, incompatible with someone they’d ever want to share their lives with — the editorial might live up to the serious social ramifications it implicates.

    t’s easy enough to point to Donald Trump as the catalyst for such a drastic social upheaval, but by failing to address the actual belief and value systems his presence has stoked among Republican men and instead just throwing up their hands and asserting that such “attitudes” must change and that “someone will need to compromise,” the Post ends up simply doing a disservice to its readers. […]

    The problem with polarization … is that it has effects well beyond the political realm, and these can be difficult to anticipate. One example is the collapse of American marriage. A growing number of young women are discovering that they can’t find suitable male partners. As a whole, men are increasingly struggling with, or suffering from, higher unemployment, lower rates of educational attainment, more drug addiction and deaths of despair, and generally less purpose and direction in their lives. But it’s not just that. There’s a growing ideological divide, too. Since Mr. Trump’s election in 2016, the percentage of single women ages 18-30 who identify as liberal has shot up from slightly over 20 percent to 32 percent. Young men have not followed suit. If anything, they have grown more conservative.

    Maybe it’s just me, but is anyone else getting tired of hearing excuses about why “men” in particular are “increasingly struggling?” Higher unemployment? Really? It’s 3.9%. “Lower rates of educational attainment?” Nope. Those rates are higher than ever, for both men and women. Perhaps if the Post had acknowledged the reality of stagnant wage growth, out of control housing and health care costs — which affect women just as much (if not more) as men — that might have proved a more enlightening exercise. As for the psychological traumas fueling drastically “more drug addiction” and “deaths of despair” among men (but apparently not as much among women) — it also might have been helpful to ask whether it isn’t more a case of the male ego and a wounded sense of their assumed primacy in our society that’s actually the root of these problems, which aren’t occurring to the same degree in other countries.

    […] The Post observes that as a consequence of this political divide, “A 2021 survey of college students found that 71 percent of Democrats would not date someone with opposing views.” Implicitly, then, this appears to be a Democratically-driven phenomenon (Republican men, apparently, are still willing to mate with anyone who will tolerate them). Accepting that premise at face value, then, the question still is “why?”

    The Post grudgingly concludes that, well yes, there may be “some logic” involved.

    There is some logic to this. Marriage across religious or political lines — if either partner considers those things to be central to their identity — can be associated with lower levels of life satisfaction.

    What kind of “things” are so “central” to women’s identities that would compel them to so collectively reject Republican males? Rather than address that question, the Post instead chooses to punt.

    This mismatch means that someone will need to compromise. As the researchers Lyman Stone and Brad Wilcox have noted, about 1 in 5 young singles will have little choice but to marry someone outside their ideological tribe. The other option is that they decline to get married at all — not an ideal outcome considering the data showing that marriage is good for the health of societies and individuals alike. […]

    Those who click on the links in that paragraph will first be directed to an article in the Atlantic written by two members of the Institute for Family Studies (IFS), a right-wing think tank whose founders and contributors promote two-parent, heterosexual marriages, advocating fundamentalist “Christian” marriage principles and the abolition of no-fault divorce laws. The second link is to a survey on marital satisfaction conducted by the same conservative-leaning IFS. […]

    Neither the Post editorial board, or the (uniformly right-wing) sources it cites explain the reasons this polarization is happening. Why it’s quite understandable that the prospect of dating someone who regards women as vessels to be forced to endure unwanted pregnancies; who supports a man currently accused by at least 26 women of sexual battery, sexual assault and rape; and who believes the solution to gun violence in our schools is to equip everyone with an AR-15, might just be a nonstarter for Democratic women (and maybe even some Democratic men!). […]

    by aligning themselves with Donald Trump, men are — implicitly and explicitly — declaring their allegiance to what he represents. Putting children in cages and tearing them away from their parents? Mocking those with disabilities? Mocking and belittling American servicemen? Lying about serial marital infidelity? Insulting and degrading women? Demonizing people of different colors, and different faiths? Refusing to take responsibility for … anything (except, perhaps, for overruling Roe v. Wade)?

    […] They’re values rooted in intolerance, bigotry and hatred. So, perhaps the more important question the Post should have explored is: Why any woman would want to commit the rest of their lives to such men? Why would anyone want to raise children by them?

    But instead, the Post editorial board decides, in effect, that incorporating one’s politics into decisions about marriage itself is an idea that needs to be re-evaluated:

    A cultural shift might be necessary — one that views politics as a part of people’s identity but far from the most important part. Americans’ ability to live together, quite literally, might depend on it.

    In essence, what the Post suggests is that Americans — and particularly Democratic American women — ought to sublimate their own values for the sake of preserving the institution of marriage. […]

    Perhaps the greatest irony of all is that those same religious-based “think tanks” that the Post cites — all of whom supported Trump in the first place — have only themselves to blame for the destruction of an institution they claim to revere.

    They shouldn’t worry so much, though. They’ll have the same opportunity to demonstrate their values in just a few short months.

  30. says

    Followup to comment 48.

    Posted by readers of the article:

    And always the notion, that it is the women who must compromise! No thanks! Don’t have anything in common with right-wing conservative men. Their beliefs I find abhorrent and cannot tolerate, nor do I want in my life. I urge the women to hold onto their principals and maybe, just maybe the male half will evolve out of this whining, grievance-based crap they have succumbed to.
    —————-
    The actions and beliefs of the male MAGA contingent, being repellent to a majority (or at least a significant plurality) of female potential partners, are going to reduce those men’s chances of reproducing. Which will, in turn, cause them to evolve out of existence.
    ————————
    The TL;DR of the editorial seems to be “hey girls, you’re just going to have to deal with abusive and toxic males to make your white babies”.
    —————————-
    Wow, what crap. The underlying message here seems to be that these silly liberal straight women need to give up their values and marry some wingnut a-hole so that we can save the institution of marriage.
    ——————–
    Speaker MAGA Mike Johnson’s way of life.
    ————————–
    Closer to an incel manifesto than a thoughtful editorial.
    ————————
    Large numbers of disaffected young men are a problem for our society, but the answer can’t be for women to tolerate men in their lives who hate what they represent
    ——————————
    The “Man-o-sphere” has started a pivot towards pushing influencers to promote “trad-wife” lifestyles and co-opted aesthetics like “cottage-core” to market to younger women. When the external religious, legal, and social rails are no longer working to pen people into the roles needed to prop up the hierarchy, then it becomes a matter for propaganda to manufacture internal rails.

    It’s a losing battle for them, but not, ultimately, one that they will give up without a fight.
    ———————————-
    This is not the first time these moral-panic articles about the death of marriage/family/life as we know it is imminent based on some group of people getting slightly more freedoms than they have traditionally enjoyed and using those freedoms to make different choices than the ones they were forced into under the old system. If the demographics are showing that assholes don’t get as many dates as they used to, the answer isn’t bemoaning the lack of asshole-tolerance these days.

  31. says

    Ukraine Update: Russian glide bombs are a major problem. F-16s are the solution.

    On Nov. 20, 2023, Ukrainian intelligence officer Tatarigami_UA wrote a short analysis describing how increasingly ubiquitous Russian glide bomb attacks have become a major problem for Ukrainian forces.

    Those glide bombs—regular dumb bombs retrofitted with wings—have limited precision. However, they are massive, and their large destructive effects have become increasingly problematic for front-line Ukrainian forces. His solution—fighter jets with 100km+ radar detection abilities and air-to-air weaponry to match, namely the F-16. [Tweet and images at the link]

    Training is ongoing. Ukraine reportedly intends to deploy the F-16s in squadron strength or greater (15-24 planes), expecting to reach a critical mass of qualified pilots and airframes by late Spring 2024.

    So, why are the F-16s important?

    Consider the struggles Ukraine has had in expanding its beachhead near Krynky. [map at the link]

    Russian forces in the area complain that their artillery is afraid to fire more than a handful of rounds before relocating due to the ferocity of Ukrainian counter battery fire. As a result, artillery doesn’t appear to be a major problem for Ukrainian forces pushing down from the riverbanks.

    Additionally, Ukrainian drones continue to target Russian armor and quickly destroy new Russian anti-drone electronic warfare (EW) systems, including one confirmed destruction on Nov. 24th. Ukraine has the upper hand in the drone war.

    While Russian artillery and drones appear to be nothing more than a nuisance, Russia’s massed glide bombing campaign is not.

    Andrew Perpetua tracks geolocated footage of Russian air strikes on his daily updated map, tracking the frequency of Russian glide bombing strikes on Ukrainian positions along the Dnipro River:

    11/24: 13 airstrikes.
    11/23: one airstrike.
    11/22: five airstrikes.
    11/21: nine airstrikes.
    11/20: two airstrikes.
    11/19: three airstrikes.
    11/18: 12 airstrikes.
    That is 45 glide bomb strikers in a single week.

    That may not sound like a huge number, but 500-1500 kilogram bombs pack far more explosive power than a 49.5 kilogram 152mm artillery shell—10 to 30 times more powerful. And even with rudimentary guidance systems, these glide bombs strike with greater accuracy than a typical artillery barrage. Look at the size of these bombs: [Tweet and image at the link]

    This is what they look like hitting targets. Look at the size of the explosions contrasted with the taller buildings still standing in Avdiivka. [Tweet and video at the link]

    And a ground-eye view: [Tweet and video at the link]

    Russian glide-bombs have a theoretical range of over 50km, but in combat situations, with pilots flying low to avoid Ukrainian air defenses, they seem to be restricted to a release range of around 35-40 kilometers.

    Thirty-seven of the 40 air strikes targeted Ukrainian positions on the left (southern) bank of the Dnipro, or within 1 kilometer of the river on the right (northern) bank. The remaining strikes struck targets within 3 km of the river. That means that Russia can only hit targets within a few kilometers of the front lines, afraid to strike deeper into Ukrainian territory.

    Given the range of the glide bombs, and the location of the strikes, we can guesstimate where Russia is releasing them—around 30-35 kilometers behind the front lines: [map at the link]

    Both Ukraine and Russia deploy various short and mid-ranged missile defenses systems close to the front lines to protect against enemy airstrikes, such as the Buk System.

    Most air defenses systems rely on radar, whether to identify the location of a target to fire a heat-seeking missile, or to guide the missile to its target. Either way, radar detection is the key to ground based air defenses.

    To avoid radar detection, Russian (and Ukrainian) pilots fly at treetop heights as they approach their targets. Low-altitude flying in NATO parlance is defined as any fixed-wing aircraft flying below 600 meters. Ukraine and Russia are flying at altitudes of around 75-150 meters.

    These low altitude approaches make radar detection difficult for two reasons.

    First, interference, or “radar clutter.” [illustration at the link]

    A radar detects aircraft by bouncing electronic waves off of the surfaces of objects. A radar is designed to ignore “blips” (contact points) that may be false positives generated by objects on the ground.

    A fighter flying low enough may appear to a radar to be a false hit and thus avoid detection.

    The second reason flying low helps avoid radar is the “radar horizon.”

    Radar waves are straight, whereas the earth’s surface is a curvature. [illustration at the link]

    By flying low enough, and far enough from the enemy radar tower, an aircraft can “fly below the horizon” from the perspective of the enemy radar crew and thus avoid detection.

    The distance at which an aircraft becomes undetectable to radar due to the curvature of the earth is called the “radar horizon.” Due to the refraction of the radar waves, actual detection distances extend beyond the simple visual horizon, but you get the point. Ultimately, given the constant nature of the earth’s curvature, a radar’s detection distance is based mostly on two factors:
    – The height of the radar.
    – The altitude of the aircraft.

    The higher the elevation from which the radar is emitted, the “further” the radar can peer over the horizon. The higher the enemy aircraft is flying, the further it can be detected. The theoretical maximum detection range of an aircraft can be reduced to a single mathematical formulae based on those two variables.

    […] For example, using a radar tower 20 meters tall, an aircraft flying at 30 meters could be detected at a distance of 41 kilometers.

    When paired with interference challenges, practical detection range falls a little below the theoretical maximum—thus Buk Systems generally detect low flying enemy aircraft at around 35 kilometers away.

    So assuming Ukrainian air defenses set up around 5 kilometers behind the front lines, the “30 kilometer zone” into which Russian aircraft dare not fly into suddenly makes a lot of sense. The release point distance is not random. It is just at the edge of Ukrainian air defense range.

    So how can Ukraine extend that range? The earth’s curvature is fixed, and Russia won’t fly its aircraft at higher altitudes. So the only other variable that can be manipulated is … the height of the radar. And that’s where F-16s come in.

    Flying at tree-top heights (150 meters or less), F-16s can remain safe from enemy air defense while detecting Russian aircraft much further than any SAM battery. The difference is massive—tracking an enemy bomber flying at 30 meters, an air defense radar antennae would see the aircraft at a distance of around 40 kilometers, while the F-16 would detect it at 72 kilometers.

    Furthermore, when Russian bombers release their glide bombs, they rapidly ascend as they prepare to release the bombs, as the bombs need altitude to glide the necessary distance. This would give F-16s in the vicinity an even better chance at interception.

    Therefore, an F-16 flying combat air patrols 30 kilometers from the front lines (to avoid Russian air defenses) with a powerful enough radar would be capable of intercepting a Russian bomber 40 kilometers or more behind the front lines.

    Ukraine is getting 61 F-16 AM/BMs from Denmark and the Netherlands which come equipped with the AN/APG-66(V2A) Radar—offering detection ranges of fighter-sized objects at distances of up to 110 kilometers. Detecting enemy aircraft at 70-75 kilometers, even through radar clutter, should be well within the capabilities of this radar.

    The question would be whether Ukraine has air-to-air missiles capable of engaging targets at 70+ kilometers. The US has already placed a large order of AMRAAM C-8 long-range missiles for Ukraine with a range of 160+ kilometers, but the first deliveries are not expected until 2026. [Yikes. That’s a long delay.]

    Securing the most advanced AMRAAM D3 or C8 missiles with 160+km ranges may be a challenge, but Ukraine may have an easier time finding allies willing to part with their stocks of AMRAAM C5 and C7 missiles, which boast an engagement range of up to 105 kilometers. AMRAAM C-5 and C-7 variants are 20-25-year-old missiles, first introduced between 1996 and 2003, thus thousands are stocked in US military stockpiles and those of Ukraine’s allies. Operators include Belgium, Canada, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Germany, Poland, France, Sweden, and others.

    If Ukraine can assemble enough pilots, F-16s with good enough radars, and armed with AMRAAM C5~C7 missiles, suddenly Ukrainian air defense against low-flying bombers could extend up to 10~20km further than it currently does. [map at the link]

    This would make a huge difference in the war.

    Presently, Russian bombers can fly in and strike targets up to 5 kilometers behind the front lines with relative impunity, staying out of radar detection ranges of Ukrainian air defenses.

    Low-flying F-16s well behind the front lines could extend the reach of Ukrainian air defense an extra 15-20 kilometers with minimal risk—neutralizing any Russian bombers in the glide bomb drop zone.

    Sixty F-16s will not be enough to provide regular around-the-clock defenses for 1,000 kilometers of front lines. But focused on a narrow stretch of hotly contested front lines, like the Dnipro riverbank near Kherson or the area north of Tokmak, the F-16s would make regular Russian glide bomb attacks too costly to conduct.

    Russia is making up for its disadvantages in drone and artillery warfare through relentless glide bombing. F-16s are what Ukraine needs to counter this new Russian threat.

  32. says

    Followup to comment 51.

    Posted by readers of the article:

    Since Russia is now using glide bombs carrying cluster munitions, Ukraine urgently urgently urgently needs countermeasures. They can’t get those F-16s soon enough.
    ——————————-
    Bureaucracies may be rigid, but individuals within them can be creative. 25-year old weapons? Time to decommission them! Wait, it’s cheaper to ship them overseas than to destroy them locally? Well, we’ve got to save those taxpayers their hard-earned money!
    ———————————-
    At what point would they need aircraft like the E3 with radar and command and control capabilities to really make use of the capabilities of the F16s? It seems to me that target acquisition and coordination from far behind the frontline will also be needed if Ukraine is going that route.

  33. says

    Nebraska activists launch effort to put abortion rights on the ballot next year

    Abortion rights supporters have launched a ballot initiative effort to put a constitutional amendment before voters next year that would protect abortion rights in a state where Republicans this year enacted a ban on the procedure after 12 weeks of pregnancy. To get onto the ballot, proponents will need to gather signatures from 10% of registered voters, which is roughly 125,000 at present. However, the exact requirement won’t be known until the July 5, 2024 filing deadline because it’s based on the registration numbers at the time.

    Importantly, supporters will also need to gather signatures from 5% of registered voters in at least two-fifths of the state’s 93 counties. This requirement significantly hinders progressives—but not conservatives—because the “bluest” two-fifths of counties include ones that Donald Trump won by landslide margins of up to 78-19. However, abortion rights advocates were able to overcome a similar requirement this year in Ohio, where voters approved an abortion rights amendment by 57-43 earlier this month.

    Organizers in several other states are pursuing similar measures next year, including in Florida, Arizona, and Missouri.

  34. says

    Corporate greed and the price of eggs

    On Tuesday, a federal jury in Illinois concluded that along with two egg industry trade groups, two of the nation’s largest egg producers conspired to restrict the availability of eggs and drive up prices. Across social media, the jury finding was immediately connected to a huge spike in the price of eggs beginning in the fall of 2022.

    However, the truth of the story is more complicated than headlines may suggest. As Bloomberg Law reports, food companies began complaining about the price-fixing scheme all the way back in 2011. What’s more, the scheme was seemingly put in place in the 1990s, if not sooner.

    The story about the price-fixing of eggs turns out to not be so much about how food producers conspired to drive up prices at a time when the nation was struggling from the lingering effects of a pandemic. It’s a story about how food industry groups and corporate producers are always looking for ways to cheat the system.

    According to the American Farm Bureau, the cost of Thanksgiving dinner is down by 4.5% compared with 2022. However, it’s up by 25% when compared with 2019. How much of that is simply corporate greed? A lot more than the national media wants to admit.

    Here’s a chart from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics looking at the prices of some common food items earlier this year. [chart at the link]

    Egg prices doubled in a month. When Thanksgiving rolled around last year, shoppers found that a dozen eggs cost almost three times as much as they had in the spring. That’s the kind of increase that media outlets—which seemed poised to deliver dire stories about inflation, even if it meant finding a family that buys 12 gallons of milk each week to use as an example—were dying to highlight. And they did.

    Whether it came from The Wall Street Journal, CNBC, or PBS, the message and the treatment were the same: numbers showing how egg prices are up, a story of some family or small restaurant owner hurt by rising costs, and an explanation that “eggflation” was caused by an outbreak of avian flu that had killed millions of chickens. The flu problem was real. However, so were the artificial shortages and price gouging among producers that had not been heavily affected by the flu.

    As a March 2023 story from CNN notes, the nation’s largest egg producer, Cal-Maine Foods, reported a 200% increase in revenues and an astounding 718% jump in profits for the previous quarter “because of sharply higher egg prices.”

    Cal-Maine controls about 20% of the U.S. market for eggs. As CNN reported, not only had the company doubled the price of its eggs, it also sold more eggs than it did in the previous year. It’s hard to find evidence of an actual shortage. What’s more, in its December 2022 quarterly report, Cal-Maine indicated that “no bird flu had been detected at any of its facilities.”

    The nation’s largest provider saw no bird flu. It sold more eggs than in 2021. But it more than doubled its price while scoring an incredible spike in profit. That certainly makes it seem like avian flu—which was a real thing that really did affect poultry production around the world—was used as an excuse to jack up prices to completely inexcusable levels.

    Unsurprisingly, Cal-Maine is one of the two companies involved in the jury finding on Tuesday.

    When it’s all put together, what it shows is an industry that has been manipulating the market for seemingly three decades or more, and that took advantage of both a real disease and media hype about inflation to disguise a naked grab for record profits.

    Eggs have long been one of the cheapest forms of protein available to consumers. They are critical to the diet of many low-income individuals and families. As this Lifehacker article pointed out during the 2022-2023 price spike, eggs deliver 20 grams of protein for just 48 cents when eggs cost $2.00 a carton. But drive the cost of those eggs up 280% and the cost per gram moves above milk, tuna, and even chicken. A traditionally cheap and versatile protein source becomes one of the most expensive.

    Corporate greed and the desire to make a quick buck always play a role in inflation. However, the price increases over the last few years are unique when it comes to “greedflation.” In 2021, 60% of inflation could be attributed not to increases in cost of raw materials or increasing wages for labor, but to increases in corporate profits.

    But somehow, The New York Times is still discussing inflation as if it’s a symptom of a need to “cool the economy” by jacking up interest rates. Naturally, the words “profit” or “greed” don’t appear in this story. The Associated Press reports that Americans “feel gloomy” about the economy, which economists attribute to “lingering financial and psychological effects of the worst bout of inflation in four decades.” That article also doesn’t mention corporate profits or greed, but it does have a story about a single mom who has had to cut back on food for her children.

    Government agencies are showing that the biggest source of inflation is corporations reaching for record profits. The nation’s largest media outlets are not reporting this story with the magnitude it deserves. However, the AP article does note that this is a problem … for President Joe Biden.

    Inflation caused by corporate greed can’t be addressed by raising interest rates that harm consumers. Solving the underlying problem can’t be done until the public is fully aware of the real cause of rising prices.

    Bur corporate media is failing them on this issue, as it is on so many others.

  35. says

    Followup to comment 54: Inflation is providing cover for price fixing

    […] “No price-fixing conspiracy in the modern world involves a written agreement where they sit down in a smoke-filled room and they say, ‘OK, we all go up by 10 percent.’ That’s not how it works. They’re not that dumb. What they’re doing is trying to coordinate in a way that defies scrutiny from the antitrust laws.”

    Singer said one common coordinating tactic is earning calls.

    “At the end of 2021 — I was livid — you’d hear these executives saying, ‘We plan on raising our prices by 17.24 percent next quarter.’ I thought to myself, I can’t believe the agencies are letting them get away with this. This is clearly an invitation to collude. […]

    Posted by readers of the article featured in comment 54:

    We seem to have neutered our regulators to the point that we are on the edge of another Golden Age designed to benefit Robber Barons who dream of an Oligarchy.
    ————————-
    I know the egg price increase freaked out my daughter. No matter how often I tried to explain the facts to her, there was no changing her mind this was the current administrations fault.
    ————————–
    Profits work and keep a corporation in business, Excess profits simply corrupt the whole system all the way the down to the share holders.
    ————————-
    The answer to this problem, of course, is resumption of anti-trust enforcement. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act is in fact relatively simple, still on the books, and entirely appropriate to this situation.

    Anti-trust enforcement started gathering dust under Nixon, and under Reagan it was shot in the head and buried in a shallow grave.

    Long past time we revived it.

  36. says

    4-year-old American hostage released by Hamas, Biden says

    President Biden announced on Sunday that a four-year-old American Israeli citizen, Abigail Idan, was among the 13 hostages released on Sunday from Gaza.

    “Two days ago, two days ago, one of our fellow Americans, a little girl named Abigail, turned four years old. She spent her birthday, that birthday… held hostage by Hamas. Today, she’s free and Jill and I, together with so many Americans, are praying for the fact that she is going to be alright. She’s free and she’s in Israel now,” Biden said in remarks on Sunday.

    “What she endured is unthinkable. Abigail was among 13 hostages released today from Gaza under the brokered and sustained though intensive US diplomacy. She’s now safely in Israel. And we continue to press and expect for additional Americans will be released as well,” he added. ” And we will not stop working until every hostage is returned to their loved ones.”

  37. tomh says

    Times-Union:
    Battle over ‘legal ballot harvesting’ being waged in New York
    GOP challenging law to allow any New Yorker to vote by mail
    By Joshua Solomon / Nov 25, 2023

    ALBANY — U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik is waging a court challenge against New York’s new vote-by-mail law in court while also promoting “legal ballot harvesting” on the campaign trail as the fierce and costly battle for control of Congress in next year’s election has already begun.

    New York Republicans are arguing the state law allowing “no-excuse” mail-in voting is unconstitutional and, if not halted right away, could hurt the “likelihood of future victory” for GOP candidates…

    Democrats, in legal briefs filed in response to the lawsuit in recent weeks, contend the state Legislature’s method to create early voting by mail for all New Yorkers — through a bill and not a constitutional amendment — is a sound, legal practice.

    “There is no express language in the New York constitution that precludes early voting by mail,” attorneys for state Attorney General Letitia James countered in a brief.

    Democrats argue extending vote by mail to anyone is within the scope of the Legislature’s ability to act within its constitutional right to dictate the “manner” in which New Yorkers vote…

    Two months ago, Gov. Kathy Hochul, a moderate Democrat, signed into law the Early Mail Voter Act. The measure, among several other components, granted any New Yorker the ability to request a ballot to vote by mail.

  38. says

    While Chinese leader Xi Jinping was meeting with President Biden and dining with 300 American CEOs in San Francisco on Nov. 16, news emerged that Chinese billionaire Jack Ma’s family trust was set to sell 10 million American Depository Shares of Alibaba Group Holdings on Nov. 21, fetching approximately $871 million.

    Ma’s move could not have come at a worse time for Alibaba. The Chinese e-commerce giant recently reversed plans to spin off its cloud operations and halted the listing of its supermarket unit, both crucial avenues for unlocking the value of its expansive business. This shift in strategy is believed to be influenced by the United States imposing tighter restrictions on chip sales to China.

    […] Despite Alibaba Chairman Joe Tsai’s attempt to appease investor disappointment by announcing that Alibaba will commence paying annual dividends, the stock plummeted by 9 percent in New York, erasing $20 billion from the company’s market value, and continued to slide during the next day’s trading in Hong Kong.

    Ma’s move holds significance for two reasons. First, it suggests that key insiders in China lack confidence in the Chinese economy, despite Xi Jinping’s efforts to demonstrate improved relations between China and the U.S., aiming to brighten the investment prospect in China and stem capital flight from the country. […]

    Link

  39. says

    Yeah, it’s more like gossip than news, but I am heartened by the fact that Trump was booed.

    Former President Trump drew a smattering of cheers and boos as he oversaw South Carolina’s chief college football rivalry Saturday.

    At the famed Palmetto Bowl, the Clemson University-University of South Carolina rivalry game, Trump attempted to upstage former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, the state’s former governor and a rising rival in the 2024 GOP presidential primary.

    […] Trump walked onto the field at halftime and garnered a fierce wave of boos from the Clemson marching band, according to video.

    […] The city of Columbia and the area around the stadium were posted with pro- and anti-Trump messages, both lauding his reelection campaign and ribbing him for a 2020 loss that he failed to accept […]

    Link

  40. says

    […] On Sunday, two days after the first group of 13 hostages was released and brought back to Israel, details began to emerge of the nearly 50 days they and others released on Saturday spent as captives of armed groups in the Palestinian enclave, via conversations with relatives.

    The freed hostages have not spoken directly to the news media and most are still being treated in private areas of Israeli hospitals. Much of the information about where, and how, they were held remains classified.

    Relatives who have spoken or met with some of the released hostages said all seemed to have spent their weeks in captivity totally cut off from the outside world, and to have returned thinner than before.

    “They were eating, but not regularly and not all of the time,” said Merav Mor Raviv, a cousin of Keren Munder, 54, who was released on Friday along with her son, Ohad Munder-Zichri, 9, and her mother, Ruth Munder, 78. “They ate a lot of rice and bread,” Ms. Raviv said, adding that Keren told her that both she and her mother had lost about 6 to 8 kilograms, or 13 to 18 pounds.

    Ms. Raviv related that the Munders had slept in a reception room on improvised benches they fashioned by pushing three chairs together, and that when they wanted to go to the bathroom they would have to knock on a door and wait — sometimes for up to two hours.

    Adva Adar’s grandmother, Yaffa Adar, 85, was among the hostages released on Friday. She noted that her grandmother had lost weight and was aware that she had been held for nearly 50 days because she had kept count.

    Ms. Raviv and Adva Adar spoke to reporters on Sunday via a video call organized by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, a nongovernmental group set up to support the hostages and their families, and Media Central, an Israeli nonprofit group that provides services to journalists.

    In an indication of how isolated the hostages were, Ms. Raviv said, Ruth Munder learned only after being released that her son, Roi, had been killed during the Oct. 7 assault. […]

    New York Times link

  41. says

    Burlington, Vermont, shooting, live updates: Three Palestinian men shot on their way to dinner

    The three men were on their way to a family dinner on Saturday night when they were shot.

    Two of the victims were wearing keffiyehs, police said, and they were speaking Arabic, according to the Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee.

    The suspect was described by Burlington police as a white man with a handgun who didn’t say a word before firing at least four times. […]

    The families said the victims are “dedicated students who deserve to be able to focus on their studies and building their futures.” […]

    “Preliminary investigation has determined that all three were visiting the home of one victim’s relatives in Burlington for the Thanksgiving holiday. The three were walking on Prospect Street when they were confronted by a white male with a handgun,” Murad said. “The suspect was on foot in the area. Without speaking, he discharged at least four rounds from the pistol and is believed to have fled on foot.”

    All three victims, whom police did not identify out of respect for their own wishes, were struck — two in the torso and one in the “lower extremities,” police said.

    Police confirmed that all three victims are Palestinian, and two of them are U.S. citizens while the other is a legal resident.

    […] Murad said now that the victims are safe and getting medical care, the priority is finding the suspect.

    “The fact is that we don’t yet know as much as we want to right now. But I urge the public to avoid making conclusions based on statements from uninvolved parties who know even less,” he said.

    […] “It is shocking and deeply upsetting that three young Palestinians were shot here in Burlington, VT,” Senator Bernie Sanders wrote on his X account. “Hate has no place here, or anywhere. I look forward to a full investigation. My thoughts are with them and their families.” […]

  42. says

    Chicago scrambles to house migrants as winter approaches

    City and state officials are looking to get migrants off the streets and out of shelters more quickly, but advocates say new restrictions will only make things harder.

    […] As of Monday morning, there were 12,251 migrants living in 26 active city-run shelters, with another 2,175 waiting in O’Hare and Midway airports, as well as inside and outside of police stations, for placement, according to a city census of new arrivals. According to the city, more than 21,700 asylum-seekers and migrants have arrived since August 2022, when Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s migrant busing program reached Chicago.

    The influx has put a strain on Chicago’s network of social services. There have not been enough shelter beds for everyone in need. And the process of moving people from temporary shelter to permanent, independent housing has been painfully slow, advocates have said.

    “It’s all about, how do you triage an ecosystem that is already in crisis?” Ayala-Bermejo said.

    […] As part of a plan to move people out of shelters and eventually into permanent housing, the state and city have put new restrictions on the assistance migrants can receive, reducing both the number of days they can stay in shelter and also the amount of rental assistance they can receive, both with the stated goal of moving people more quickly into independent living.

    Last week, Gov. J.B. Pritzker announced that the state would invest an additional $160 million to address “bottlenecks” in the “asylum-seeker resettlement pipeline.” According to the governor, that includes: $65 million to expand case management, housing assistance and legal services; another $65 million to create “winterized” temporary housing for up to 2,000 migrants and ensure safe and warm places for migrants to live during winter months; and $30 million to launch an intake center.

    The state also is reducing rental assistance for asylum-seekers in shelters to three months of rent, down from up to six months. The governor’s office said this would “allow all current shelter residents to access” the rent-assistance program. But going forward, the program will not be available to new migrant arrivals, the state said, adding, “housing assistance will still be provided to support the housing search process, tenant rights, and landlord-tenant communications.”

    […] Advocates said those changes could hinder efforts to find housing and potentially lead to asylum-seekers falling through the cracks and out onto the streets in plunging temperatures.

    […] Phelps said it had already been difficult to find landlords and property managers willing to rent to migrants with up to six months of rental assistance, as most asylum-seekers lack documentation usually provided during the rental process and do not yet have work permits. He feared that reducing the program would make the process more daunting.

    “I feel very defeated. There’s no way the city is going to be able to keep its promises,” Phelps said.

    […] The state said last week that since August 2022, some 9,000 migrants have been resettled — either by being placed in permanent housing or with relatives — both inside the state of Illinois and in other states.

    Oscar Peñalver Sanchez hopes to soon be among them. After living for about a year in a shelter with more than 150 other migrants, he recently moved into his own apartment.

    “It’s a huge relief because it’s difficult to stay in the shelters for so long,” he said in Spanish, but added that he was grateful to have had “somewhere to sleep and lay our heads.”

    He is in the process of applying for a work permit, which he hopes will put him on track to becoming financially independent.

    “I want to work and face life head on,” he said.

  43. says

    Trump and Nunes Are Now Selling “World Class Wines” Loaded With Glycerine. No Joke

    Devin Nunes is now in the wine business. Last I knew, he and Donald Trump were going to sue every media outlet on the planet for reporting that they lost $71 million when the figure was a mere $31.6. But even though Truth Social is doing just fine, for some reason Nunes is spreading his wings into another line of work.

    Now this I need to share: I actually know something about fine wines. I used to pair appropriate wines with courses for some high end caterers. So I know the difference between a Pouilly Fuisse and a Pouilly Fume and which one goes with Chinese food and which one goes with trout. So in reading the reviews of Nunes new “vintages” my jaw fell open.

    This news story isn’t getting a lot of press for some reason. PolitiZoom picked up on on it and the writer there is as horrified as I am. Now before you read what she said, let me tell you about glycerine in wine. Glycerine is a chemical additive, added to wine “to sweeten, add body, and smooth and mellow wine and liqueurs.” This is not how fine wine is made, I guarantee. This is rotgut. […]

    These are “patriot” “world class” wines. Uh huh. What world? Mars? The atmosphere there smells like rotten eggs. Wait, that might be the perfect environment to drink a Devin Nunes wine. This is from Nunes website.

    OLD WORLD WINES HANDCRAFTED FROM PORTUGUESE AND BORDEAUX VARIETALS GROWN IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ON THE CENTRAL COAST OF CALIFORNIA. VINEYARDS THAT STRETCH FROM THE MOUNTAIN TOPS OF PASO ROBLES TO THE VALLEYS NEAR THE PACIFIC OCEAN. DEVIN NUNES HAS A PASSION FOR MAKING WORLD CLASS RED BLENDS THAT BECOME MORE ELEGANT WITH AGE.

    DEVIN ENLISTED HIS LONGTIME FRIEND AND AWARD WINNING WINEMAKER MIKE SINOR TO CREATE THESE FINE WINES. TOGETHER THEY’VE HARNESSED THE CLASSIC TECHNIQUES OF PORTUGAL, SUCH AS TIME-HONORED GRAPE VARIETIES AND METICULOUS AGING, TO CREATE WINES THAT EXUDE ELEGANCE AND RICHNESS. THESE WINES ARE A TESTAMENT TO DEVIN’S DEDICATION AND METICULOUS ATTENTION TO DETAIL.

    […] they’re going to drink a fine cabernet with Donald Trump’s mug shot on it. […]

    No, I can see it all now, unfolding before me. The gourmet-ization of MAGA. The day MAGA went cultural. Who wants to tell them that drinking wine is what the commie liberals that they hate so much do? […]

    Here, let’s read a review, shall we?

    The first vintage, 2021, will be publicly released this month. […] I recently had an opportunity to sample both with some friends. They are amazing wines. Deep, dark, midnight ruby in color, lots of glycerine, (gylcerine? As in nitro? Oh my phuquing god — it’s an ADDITIVE!) with an intense (as in bitter?) hard-to-pinpoint nose. […]

    Something woody? […] Unfamiliar to the American palate! (That translates as “This is pure swill but if you think so, it’s because you have an American palate”) these were wines full of hints and adumbrations (BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA) rather than declarative sentences. (This isn’t a wine review, this is SATIRE. Trust me on that one, too.)

    Adumbration “means the act of providing vague advance indications.” It’s not used in wine reviews. At least none I’ve ever seen and I’ve been reading them about 40 years now. This is paint thinner. On a good day it might be mouthwash or salad dressing. But this is not fine wine. This is maybe Boone’s Farm at four times the price, and with Trump’s face on it. Or Nunes’ name.

    […] Nobody in the Republican party wants to govern. They just want to sell people shit. And shit is what this wine is.

  44. Reginald Selkirk says

    US Energy Department Funds Next-Gen Semiconductor Projects to Improve Power Grids

    America’s long-standing Advanced Research Projects Agency (or ARPA) developing the foundational technologies for the internet.

    This week its energy division announced $42 million for projects enabling a “more secure and reliable” energy grid, “allowing it to utilize more solar, wind, and other clean energy.” But specifically, they funded 15 projects across 11 states to improve the reliability, resiliency, and flexibility of the grid “through the next-generation semiconductor technologies.”

    Streamlining the coordinated operation of electricity supply and demand will improve operational efficiency, prevent unforeseen outages, allow faster recovery, minimize the impacts of natural disasters and climate-change fueled extreme weather events, and reduce grid operating costs and carbon intensity…

  45. Reginald Selkirk says

    Attackers seize an Israel-linked tanker off Yemen in a third such assault during Israel-Hamas war

    Attackers seized a tanker linked to Israel off the coast of Yemen on Sunday, authorities said. While no group immediately claimed responsibility, it comes as at least two other maritime attacks in recent days have been linked to the Israel-Hamas war.

    The attackers seized the Liberian-flagged Central Park, managed by Zodiac Maritime, in the Gulf of Aden, the company and private intelligence firm Ambrey said…

  46. Reginald Selkirk says

    Eerie ‘witch bottles’ found along Gulf of Mexico, and even researchers are creeped out

    Superstitious beachcombers who spot glass glinting along the shore of the Gulf of Mexico ought to exercise caution – “witch bottles” intended to entomb malevolent spirits are popping up along the coast, one researcher said.

    On a 60-mile stretch of beach near Corpus Christi, Texas, monitored by the Harte Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, eight of the curious artifacts have washed up onshore since 2017, per researcher Jace Tunnell.

    Tunnell pulled the most recent bottle, filled with vegetation, on Nov. 15 – gooseneck barnacles that had clustered on the green glass indicated that the bottle had been floating for quite a while, the researcher said.

    “I don’t get creeped out by them, but I’m also not going to open them,” Tunnell told Fox News Digital. “I mean, they’re supposed to have spells and stuff in them – why take the chance?” …

  47. says

    What next? Texas legislators don’t know.

    […] it is unclear what happens next at the Capitol [in Texas] after the House voted 84-63 to strip a voucher program out of a broad education bill.

    Abbott responded to the defeat by promising to “continue advancing school choice in the Texas Legislature and at the ballot box.” He has not said whether he wants legislators to keep trying in the current special session — which still can go until Dec. 6 — or whether he would call a fifth special session to push again for vouchers.

    “Texas parents deserve the freedom to choose the education path that’s best for their child to succeed,” Abbott spokesperson Renae Eze said in a statement for this story. “Governor Abbott has made it clear that he will do whatever it takes — however long it takes — to deliver that freedom for all Texas families through school choice.”

    Voucher opponents in both parties hoped that Friday’s vote was decisive enough to put an end to Abbott’s crusade, which dates back to his 2022 reelection campaign. To drive home the message, anti-voucher state Rep. Four Price, R-Amarillo, led the House in passing a motion to prohibit any reconsideration of Raney’s amendment. […]

    Other House Republicans lamented [the earlier vote in November], especially because the amendment’s passage likely doomed the entire bill, which includes increased public school funding and teacher pay raises. Abbott had made clear he would veto the bill if it did not include the voucher provision.

    […] Prior to the amendment vote, Abbott raised the prospect he would summon lawmakers back for another special session if they removed the voucher provision. […]

    Yet Abbott has not repeated that threat since Friday, and both chamber leaders have stayed quiet on their plans for the rest of the special session. The Senate’s presiding officer, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, issued a long statement Tuesday bashing the House and its leader, House Speaker Dade Phelan, for “killing school choice,” [Republicans always try to brand killing public education as “school choice”] signaling he sees little hope for a revival of the proposal in the near future.

    […] The Senate is set to return 12:30 p.m. Monday, while the House is slated to come back at 4 p.m. that day.

    Even before HB 1 reached the floor, the House was struggling to consistently maintain quorum. By all appearances, lawmakers were starting to move on with their lives and uninterested in traveling to Austin unless they knew major legislation would be up for debate.

    […] Abbott has long suggested he would politically target GOP lawmakers who block his voucher crusade. The endorsements he announced Monday were seen as the first move in that direction.

    […] “Many of us are so resolute on this, that we’re going to break caucus rules, and we’re gonna support primary challengers,” Toth said.

    Link

  48. says

    Followup to comment 67.

    Posted by readers of the article:

    If only charter schools managed to educate their students any better than traditional public schools. Then they might be worth the subsidies they get from cannibalizing the public school system.
    —————————-
    This isn’t about charter schools, this is about entirely unregulated (and mostly right-wing Christian) private schools getting state money. This is, in fact, a bigger threat to our public school system than charter schools. After all, charter schools are still public in the sense that they have to follow some rules and cannot pick and choose their students in the way that private schools can.
    ————————-
    Much of the “Texas miracle” economy is based on importing educated workers from other states, and that has been true ever since I moved here in the eighties. I came to Texas as an engineer fresh out of college, and I can tell you that my fellow engineers were also mostly from out of state. Yeah, we had a few UT grads and Aggies (A&M), but they were the minority.

    So what happens to the Texas economy if those out of state engineers (and other professionals) are no longer willing to take jobs here because of the hostile environment our state government is creating?
    ——————————–
    Texas school districts should make clear to the voters that if public schools lose money due to “school choice” then the first cut is eliminating the football team.
    —————————
    Public schools in rural Texas are the backbone of the small towns. There’s not much else to do on any given Friday night. There are no charter schools and only 2 religious schools within a 40 mile radius of my home.

  49. says

    Sigh. Stephen Miller … the news about him is worse and worse.

    […] former Trump senior adviser Stephen Miller is special. The same guy who thought it was a rad idea to forcibly remove children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border is now pretending he cares about parents’ rights—and so he’s harassing transgender kids to make his point.

    The America First Legal Foundation, for which Miller serves as president, is currently suing Arizona’s Mesa Public Schools and its superintendent because they’ve decided to treat transgender students as human beings instead of political pawns. Of course, that’s an outrage to Miller and his ilk […]

    The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Mesa Public Schools governing board member Rachel Walden, seeks to turn back policies the district has instituted to protect the rights of transgender kids.

    Arizona Republic:

    The suit alleges the school district’s guidelines for supporting transgender students violate Arizona’s parents’ bill of rights law, which says parents have the right to direct their child’s upbringing, education and health care. The district’s guidelines permit transgender students to access facilities consistent with their gender identity and to use names and pronouns that reflect their identity. The lawsuit claims the district purposely keeps parents out of the loop when a gender-related support plan is implemented for their child. […]

    In the spring, the district sought legal advice from Udall Shumway, a Mesa-based law firm, on the guidelines. A lawyer from the firm told Mesa Public Schools’ general counsel in a May letter that the guidelines do not appear to violate state or federal law, and there seems to be “no contradiction between what the law requires under the Arizona parents’ bill of rights … and what the Guidelines recommend to staff as a tool to assist in addressing the students’ needs.”

    […] The America First Legal Foundation has also tried to defend Arizona’s law prohibiting transgender girls from competing on girls’ school sports teams. Over the summer, Miller’s group filed a motion to intervene to defend the law on behalf of the conservative group Arizona Women of Action. That motion was denied. The group also filed a brief supporting an attempt to overturn a preliminary order in the case. That appeal is still pending.

    As the Arizona Republic notes, the America First Legal Foundation has filed dozens of lawsuits across the country “challenging school districts’ policies related to LGBTQ+ students and challenging private companies’ programs to promote diversity, alleging they are examples of reverse discrimination against white people and men.”

    Meanwhile, the organization is not keen on Mesa Public Schools’ “Guidelines for Support of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Students,” which were created to “help schools ensure a safe learning environment free from discrimination and harassment, and to support the educational and social needs of transgender and gender nonconforming students.”

    Of course, while Miller and his group are ostensibly intervening on behalf of parents, a June letter from Superintendent Andi Fourlis to families who have children enrolled in Mesa Public Schools emphasized that parents are consulted every step of the way:

    […] I hear a concern that students are placed on Transgender Support Plans without parent notification. That is not the case. I have also heard that the Transgender Support Plan is a plan to help students with medical transitions. That is also not true.

    Not that Miller cares about the truth […] This is the same guy who helped bury a Health and Human Services report that proved immigrants contribute more in federal, state, and local taxes than they receive in benefits. Because we can’t let people know that immigrants are a net plus for society—and always have been. […]

    We wish Stephen Miller the best of luck as he transitions from human being to Beelzebub’s Diet Coke gofer. Hopefully, he ruins as few lives as possible in the process.

    Link

  50. says

    Followup to comment 69.

    Posted by readers of the article:

    Last week The Messenger reported that in 2022 Miller’s nonprofit legal attack group raised $44 million last year, mostly from a single donor that was not identified.
    ————————–
    of course the parents of trans kids don’t have rights under these new “Parental rights” laws, do they?
    —————-

    The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Mesa Public Schools governing board member Rachel Walden

    So we see that this “parents’ rights” lawsuit isn’t even being filed on behalf of a parent, but rather on behalf of a school board member who was on the losing end of a vote?

  51. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 66

    “I mean, they’re supposed to have spells and stuff in them – why take the chance?” …

    Why? How about BECAUSE MAGIC DOESN’T FUCKING EXIST YOU SUPERSTITIOUS, KNUCKLE-DRAGGING, SUB-HUMAN SHIT!?!?!?

  52. says

    Angelo Carusone, president and CEO of Media Matters, appeared on “The Katie Phang Show”:

    PHANG: “Angelo, let’s be clear. X’s problem with advertisers came long before Media Matters did this report and before this lawsuit. As early as this summer, advertising on that platform was down nearly 60%. Do you think Musk is just using this lawsuit as a scapegoat for his own poor management of this company?”

    CARUSONE: “Yeah, and I think not only the mismanagement in terms of gutting the brand safety, the trust teams. To your point, advertisers had been leaving. A lot of them left very early on before he even really made big changes yet because he signaled he was going to roll back a lot of brand safety.

    So I think that’s part of it. And I think the other part, we shouldn’t forget this, is that this lawsuit came and this advertiser exodus came not only on the heels of the report that we put out but on Elon Musk’s own behavior, where he wasn’t just … engaging with some pretty extreme antisemitic Great Replacement Theory, he responded to this notion that the thing that people were chanting in Charlottesville, that Jews in America are somehow funding mass immigration in order to dilute white power, he responded to that Great Replacement Theory claiming ‘the actual truth’ on his own platform.

    So if you’re an advertiser, you’re looking at the increased rise in extremism and toxicity. We’re putting out reports showing that they’re sharing ad revenue with these Hitler stan accounts, getting thousands of dollars of ad revenue.

    […] Then other reports come out showing the juxtaposition of ads next to extreme content. And if you’re an advertiser, when you put it all together, you’re like the rot goes all the way to the top and they’re never going to really be able to put in place the kinds of mechanisms that make it good for business. At least that’s from an advertiser’s perspective.”

  53. says

    […] News organizations are supposed to report news, not make it. And they’re definitely not supposed to manufacture it out of whole cloth. But then Fox is not so much a news organization as a […] Playland ball pit for adults.

    Posted by Brian Stelter:

    A Fox reporter says Biden “continues to face questions about his age, even here in Nantucket”

    Then he plays a clip of Biden being asked, “Mr. President, are you too old to be running for reelection?”

    Without disclosing that the reporter is the one shouting the question

    Transcript:

    FOX’S LUCAS TOMLINSON (VOICEOVER): “The oldest president in U.S. history also continues to face questions about his age, even here in Nantucket.”

    TOMLINSON (SHOUTING QUESTION AT BIDEN): “Mr. President, are you too old to be running for reelection?”

    BIDEN: “That’s stupid.”

    TOMLINSON (SHOUTING AT BIDEN): “Why is Donald Trump beating you in the latest polls?”

    TOMLINSON (“REPORTING”): “President Biden faces the lowest approval rating of his presidency. We hope to hear from President Biden before he takes off to go back to Washington.”

    [video at the link]

    […] But hey, it’s vitally important for our country that we have a presidential horse race—even if one of the horses is a fascist who’s currently channeling Hitler and promising to jail his enemies. And you know Fox will always do its part for the dozen or so grotesquely rich men who might actually benefit from another Trump term.

    Link

  54. Reginald Selkirk says

    Leader of pro-Russia DDoS crew Killnet unmasked by Russian state media

    Cybercriminals working out of Russia go to great lengths to conceal their real identities, and you won’t ever find the state trying to unmask them either – as long as they keep supplying the attacks on Axis nations. It’s the reason why we found it so amusing that of all the ways the identity of an organized cybercrime gang leader could be revealed, it was Russian state media that may have recently outed someone of note.

    Moscow-based Gazeta.ru has named a man it alleges to be the leader of pro-Russia DDoS merchants Killnet, known as “Killmilk,” in an expose following earlier claims that he started targeting the Russian Federation…

  55. says

    Florida’s Ladapo finds new ways to become even more controversial

    When Gov. Ron DeSantis tapped Dr. Joseph Ladapo to serve as Florida’s surgeon general, the highly controversial doctor became the Sunshine State’s top public health official. The University of Florida wanted to go a step further and give Ladapo a second well-paid position.

    In fact, as Politico reported, it was just two years ago when the school — the flagship of the state’s university system — took steps to fast-track Ladapo into a tenured professorship, with the expectation that he’d bring in lucrative grant funding and conduct worthwhile research on internal medicine. With this in mind, Ladapo was able to skip past the usual review process generally required for candidates for tenured professorships.

    Apparently, that hasn’t turned out especially well. From the Politico report:

    [Ladapo] edited science research manuscripts, gave a guest lecture for grad students and wrote a memoir about his vaccine skepticism. … Some also bristled that Ladapo, in an email to the heads of the medical school, said he’d only visited the sprawling Gainesville campus twice in his first year on the job, showing a lack of familiarity with Florida’s flagship medical school.
    An unnamed professor was quoted saying that Ladapo has “undoubtedly sullied the academic reputation” of the University of Florida.

    Democratic state Sen. Tina Polsky added that she’d asked Ladapo during his confirmation hearing last year about his performance at the school, and he responded with “his typical word salad answers.” She added, “This guy is a charlatan.”

    It’s worth noting for context that this is hardly the first controversy surrounding Florida’s surgeon general. Revisiting our earlier coverage, Ladapo has rejected vaccination guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and faced accusations about misleading the public. He’s embarrassed professional colleagues with his antics and urged the public not to trust scientists, physicians, and other public health officials.

    […] The editorial board of The Orlando Sentinel described Ladapo as a “COVID crank” who’s been “associated with a right-wing group of physicians whose members include a physician who believes infertility and miscarriages are the result of having sex with demons and witches during dreams.”

    Earlier this month, Ladapo even took the unusual step of hitting the campaign trail, participating in a super PAC event in an early primary state in the hopes of giving a boost to the politician [DeSantis] who gave him his influential job.

    What’s more, let’s also not forget that Ladapo’s former supervisor at UCLA discouraged Florida officials from hiring the controversial doctor, explaining that he relies on his opinions more than scientific evidence. The UCLA supervisor added that Ladapo’s weird theories “created a stressful environment for his research and clinical colleagues and subordinates,” some of whom believed the doctor “violated the duty in the Hippocratic Oath to behave honestly and ethically.”

    One UCLA source told my colleague Kay Guerrero, in reference to Ladapo, “A lot of people here at UCLA are glad that he is gone because we were embarrassed by his opinions and behavior. At the same time, we don’t wish this on the people of Florida. They don’t deserve to have someone like him making their health decisions.”

    The relevance of that quote lingers for a reason.

  56. says

    Fascism’s most powerful backers: The Mercers may go all in on the coup-attempting Trump

    There are few families more consequential to the rise of fascism in this country than the Mercers. Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah have been the big-money funders behind most of the most aggressively fascist-minded groups you may have heard of. While the more famous Koch family has centered its political giving around corporate-friendly dismantling of government, the Mercers are the funders for Republicanism’s far right, from white nationalist organizations to anti-democratic hoaxes and paranoia. [And they backed Betsy Devos.]

    The Mercers backed Donald Trump’s 2016 rise before becoming disenchanted with him somewhere near the midpoint of his term, reportedly unsatisfied with what their political investment had brought them. A new CNBC report, however, suggests that the father-daughter pair are once again mulling whether to back Trump as Trump attempts to retake the presidency on a platform of openly authoritarian rule.

    One of the Republican Party’s most influential families may come off the sidelines to financially support Donald Trump’s latest White House run, after years of distancing themselves from him, according to people familiar with the matter.

    Robert Mercer and his daughter, Rebekah, have not yet made a final decision on whether they’ll publicly back Trump, these people said. But the Mercers remain friendly with key players in Trump’s orbit, including former senior counselor Kellyanne Conway, according to some of the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of the thinking of the notoriously private Mercer family.

    Once again, the real story here is that this story is being shopped to begin with. We have only “people familiar with the matter” to rely on here, which means somebody involved with the Mercers, possibly with their permission, wants the political world to know the Mercer family may be close to choosing the horse they’ll bet on.

    Is it a prodding meant for the Trump camp, a signal that the family is willing to meet supplicants from Trump’s camp and hear them out on why the indicted and furious Trump is again a good investment? Or is it meant to test the waters after the Mercers apparently began to feel uneasy about the publicity that resulted from their successful efforts to push Republicans into white nationalism and anti-democratic extremism?

    The Mercers have reportedly become quite sensitive to charges that they support white nationalism […]

    That the Mercers are one of the most powerful backers of fascist causes in America seems incontrovertible. An especially good rundown of the Mercer causes and connections was published by Salon a month after the Jan. 6 insurrection.

    “The Mercers laid the groundwork for the Trump revolution,” Bannon told The New Yorker in 2017. “Irrefutably, when you look at donors during the past four years, they have had the single biggest impact of anybody, including the Kochs.” Steve Schmidt, a former Republican strategist and co-founder of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project, sees it differently. Rebekah Mercer, he said in an interview with Salon, is the “chief financier or one of the chief financiers of the fascist movement, and that’s what it is.”

    Rebekah Mercer was a co-founder of Parler, the social media network popular with white supremacists, neo-Nazis, militia groups, and the Jan. 6 insurrectionists. Previously known more for their backing of xenophobic far-right groups, Mercer backed-groups leaned heavily towards the promotion of anti-democratic election hoaxes before Trump’s attempted coup.

    Whatever might have caused the Mercers to sour on Trump during his largely hapless and incompetence-riddled administration, it appears Trump’s violent insurrection and attempted coup might have actually boosted his worth in the eyes of the Mercers. […] apparently the Mercers are mulling returning as major Trump backers now that Trump is promising full-on fascist rule, from the purge of non-MAGA federal workers to the promised mass deportation of millions.

    It is something to watch. […]

    Posted by readers of the article:

    Those neo Nazis were thick as thieves with Steve Bannon and Peter Thiel too. And the DeVoss family, which includes Erik Prince, of Blackwater infamy, and so many iterations of it since. Private armies.
    ————————-
    When fascism comes to America it’ll be waving the flag and carrying a cross and be fully funded by billionaires.

  57. says

    Better Watch Out Sweden! You Are Pi**ing Elon Musk Off!

    The Swedes better watch out! Those spoiled Swedish workers are pissing off anti-union Elon Musk!

    It has taken nearly a month, but workers striking against Tesla in Sweden have finally drawn a response from the company’s famously anti-union boss. “This is insane,” CEO Elon Musk said Thursday on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter that he owns.

    Musk was responding to news that Swedish postal workers are refusing to deliver Tesla license plates, joining a wave of action in sympathy with mechanics who stopped servicing Tesla cars late last month.

    About 130 mechanics began their ongoing strike in October after their employer, a Tesla subsidiary in Sweden, announced that it would not recognize their labor union, according to Expressen, a CNN affiliate.

    The industrial action soon spread to dockworkers who started blocking deliveries of Tesla cars at the country’s ports, to electricians who stopped maintenance work for the carmaker, and other workers in Sweden, Expressen reported.

    Amazing! According to CNN, nine out of ten workers are unionized in Sweden. And it appears those other union workers are not fans of the X King and his anti-union ways.

    What will Musk do in retaliation? Close out X for Swedes? LOL.

  58. says

    Israel and Hamas Agree to Extend Truce, Qatar Says

    New York Times link

    Israel and Hamas agreed to extend their truce for two more days, according to officials in Qatar who helped negotiate the initial cease-fire, as Israeli officials signaled that a fourth exchange of hostages and prisoners would go forward Monday.

    Majed Al-Ansari, a spokesman for the foreign ministry of Qatar, which has helped mediate the talks that led to the initial pause in fighting, said an “agreement has been reached to extend the humanitarian truce for an additional two days in the Gaza Strip.” It did not elaborate on the terms. […]

  59. says

    […] “Blatant antisemite & publisher of antisemitism Elon Musk should be persona non grata in Israel,” Haaretz editor-in-chief Esther Solomon wrote in a post on X. “Instead, Netanyahu — plumbing new depths of amoral sycophancy — gifts him a PR visit to the kibbutzim devastated by Hamas. Profane, venal, bilious, both of them.” […]

    Link

  60. says

    Schumer plans to advance Ukraine funding as soon as Dec. 4

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) informed his colleagues in a letter Sunday that he will bring legislation to the Senate floor funding the war in Ukraine and providing aid to Israel “as soon as the week of December 4th.”

    Schumer warned senators that time is running out for Ukrainian forces, and he identified GOP senators’ demands for immigration policy reforms as “the biggest holdup to the national security assistance package.”

    The Democratic leader indicated he’ll give Senate negotiators at least another week to hammer out a compromise on asylum reform and border security funding but signaled they have limited time to reach a deal.

    “One of the most important tasks we must finish is taking up and passing a funding bill to ensure we as well as our friends and partners in Ukraine, Israel, and the Indo-Pacific region have the necessary military capabilities to confront and deter our adversaries and competitors,” he wrote, also citing the need to provide humanitarian assistance to Palestinians caught up in the fighting in Gaza.

    “These national security priorities are interrelated and demand bipartisan Congressional action,” he wrote.

    Schumer noted that negotiations over border security, asylum and other immigration reforms continued over the Thanksgiving holiday.

    “We will need bipartisan cooperation and compromise to achieve a reasonable, realistic agreement that both sides can support. I urge you to engage with our Republican colleagues quickly to help push for a bipartisan path forward in the coming weeks,” he wrote.

    Schumer informed Senate colleagues there will be an all-senators classified briefing on Ukraine in the next few days and urged them to attend.

    “Remember what President Zelenskyy told us in the Old Senate Chamber when he addressed senators in September, ‘If we don’t get the aid, we will lose the war.’ Nothing would make autocrats like Putin or Xi happier right now than to see the United States waver in our support for the Ukrainian people and its military,” he wrote, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

  61. birgerjohansson says

    I found an interesting video at Youtube.
    Remember how the media in general, -in particular television- is pretty awful and has contributed to the dumbificstion of the American voters.

    It does NOT have to be this way.

    “How watching the news in Germany is completely different than in America”
    https://youtu.be/jphacgBLrc0

  62. Reginald Selkirk says

    @65

    Tanker in Middle East safe from attackers after U.S. Navy responds, officials say

    A U.S. Navy warship responded to a distress call from a commercial tanker in the Gulf of Aden that had been seized by armed individuals and the vessel is now safe, U.S. officials said on Sunday.

    The tanker, which had been carrying a cargo of phosphoric acid, was identified as the Central Park by the vessel’s company. The officials did not identify the attackers.

    In a statement, the U.S. military said the USS Mason, with help from allied ships, demanded that the commercial ship be released by the attackers.

    Five armed individuals tried to escape on a fast boat but were chased by the U.S. warship and they eventually surrendered…

  63. tomh says

    Election Law Blog
    “Why Biden’s Weakness Among Young Voters Should Be Taken Seriously”
    RICHARD PILDES / November 27, 2023

    This Nate Cohn piece for the NYT argues that we should take seriously the results from a number of recent polls which converge on the finding that young voters are more divided on a Biden-Trump contest than in 2020. But this paragraph toward the end of the piece cuts the other way:

    “There’s one other way the results might end up “normal,” even with today’s polling: a low youth turnout. Almost all of the polls nowadays are among registered voters, not likely voters, and most of Mr. Biden’s weakness is among disengaged voters on the periphery of the electorate. In the latest Times/Siena polling, Mr. Biden leads by 15 points among young voters who turned out in the midterms, while he trails by three points among young voters who didn’t turn out. If these irregular, disaffected voters simply choose not to vote, Mr. Biden will most likely have a healthy lead with young voters.”

  64. says

    […] One of the features of this variant of the “settler colonialism” construct is that any resistance by definition justified. The purpose of this is to collapse any idea that the current round of violence began with or was triggered by the October 7th attacks. One side of the conflict (Israel) is incapable of acting in self-defense because they are inherently the aggressor – by definition and in all cases. The ubiquitous claims of “genocide” are fruit of the same totalizing ideology. As argued a few weeks ago, claims that what is happening today in Gaza is “genocide” not only conflict with the most basic definitions of the word and the relevant parts of international law. They amount to a premeditated slander, one among many examples of equating Zionism, for all its flaws, with some of the greatest tormentors and torments Jews faced in the 20th century. It is understandable that some people unfamiliar with the details and definitions may gullibly buy into that formulation given the now lopsided number of fatalities on each side. But it is worth noting that the “genocide” claims began in the first 48 hours after October 7th, when the distribution was reversed.

    If these are the terms of the debate, if these are the stakes, then no settlement is possible. But this is also an illustrative example of a case in which some real grounding in history is indispensable to navigating the present. History doesn’t settle protracted conflicts. One side never convinces the other. We each prioritize different aspects of the past to make sense of it. This is inevitable. But grappling with history still complicates the enthusiasms and amnesia of sloganeering and propaganda and in that way cracks open spaces for, if not compromise, then moments of mutual understanding.

    That’s far from where we are at the moment.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/history-and-enthusiasm

  65. says

    Ukraine Update: General Storm smashes Russian defenses in Crimea

    After a year building up defenses in Crimea, Russia saw many of them swept away in a massive storm this weekend.

    Much like they’ve done along the entire front line in Zaporizhzhya, in the approaches to Tokmak, Melitipol, and Mariupol, Russia built an extensive network of coastal defenses across all of western Crimea, attempting to protect against any Ukrainian amphibious assault. [Annotated satellite image at the link]

    This 100-year storm absolutely pummeled both Crimea and Ukraine’s port city of Odesa. The videos of the storm, with its 6-meter (20-foot) waves, are dramatic: [Tweets and videos eat the link]

    Those coastal defenses are all gone.

    […] the odds of Ukraine staging an amphibious assault on Crimea’s western coast are just about zero. Ukraine lacks the amphibious ships to transport equipment, the navy to protect them, the air power to cover their approach, and the sustainment capabilities to supply that force after landing. There is nothing more difficult in warfare than an amphibious assault, and Ukraine lacks pretty much everything it would need for one.

    On the other hand, the elimination of these defenses, however temporary, will make it easier for Ukrainian raiding parties to infiltrate the coastline , like the way they did earlier this summer to reportedly destroy Russian radar arrays—sabotage that opened up Sevastopol to Ukrainian long-range missile attacks.

    The storm may also affect Russia’s critically important railway logistics. This is in mainland Russia, near Putin’s palace in Sochi: [Tweet and video at the link]

    But the storm’s real value may not be those on-shore defenses and infrastructure, but the off-shore ones. [Tweet and images at the link]

    Russia has placed a network of barges and booms with netting all around its sensitive port facilities, both in Crimea and in Russia’s mainland. That includes all of its naval bases and the Crimean Kerch Bridge. The purpose is to block the ability of Ukrainian naval drones from hitting those targets, and by all indications, they are pretty effective at it.

    The chances that any of those ocean defenses survived this massive storm are just about nil, giving Ukraine an opportunity to launch a new wave of naval drones against these targets. Heck, the Kerch Bridge is the juiciest and most strategically important target of all. Let’s hope Ukraine has the means to capitalize on this opportunity.

    Furthermore, there will be a lot of unmoored mines floating around Russian harbors. If Ukraine is lucky, a few of them smashed up against Russian warships.

    Another storm video: [video at the link] Any rotary-wing aircraft Russia failed to evacuate is likely trashed. Hopefully, they were too incompetent to fly them out in time. There is also a great deal of hope that the storm might’ve sunk some Russian vessels. We’ll have more clarity in the coming 24 hours. Russians love to post videos of their broken stuff.
    ———————————-
    [Tweet and video at the link: “Head of RT Margarita Simonyan predicted that Russia’s demographic crisis will be resolved in the future, when streams of Americans will flood to Russia—even if they have to work fixing toilets. Russia will choose only the best and send the rest back home.”]

    Wouldn’t it be great if streams of MAGA Americans fled to Russia? Problem is, if they only take the best and the brightest Americans to work on fixing toilets, that kind of excludes all of them.

    Let’s hope they lower their standards.

  66. says

    FFS. Here we go again: Trump touts new push to repeal Obamacare

    Donald Trump is once again living in the past, trying to resurrect a Republican political debacle that even the Freedom Caucus has abandoned: Obamacare repeal. “The cost of Obamacare is out of control, plus, it’s not good Healthcare. I’m seriously looking at alternatives,” he spewed on Truth Social on Saturday.

    […] Republicans absolutely gave up after the last gasp for “repeal and replace,” Trumpcare, failed to make it to the Senate floor in 2017. That’s after they spent seven years and at least 70 votes on trying to kill the Affordable Care Act, the program that has provided health insurance to more than 40 million Americans.

    […] But Trump is either trying to make the nation’s first Black president his foe in 2024 because he’s a racist and wants to keep his racist base fired up, or he’s living in the past in his addled brain. [At rallies Trump refers to Obama when he means Biden … and he makes that mistake repeatedly.] Either way, the health care of more than 40 million people is on the line in the next election. Again.

  67. says

    For some time now, Donald Trump has touted himself as “the most pro-life president ever” — and if one’s understanding of being “pro-life” is exclusively limited to being “pro-forced-birth,” then he’s not actually wrong. At least not from an existential point of view. Whether or not he actually ever gave a crap about abortion has long been up for debate. Frankly, the idea of him sincerely believing anything is up for debate.

    However, as per a report from Rolling Stone, he is now looking to rebrand himself as a moderate on abortion. Yes, the guy who kicked off the whole “women are having abortions as they’re giving birth!” thing, the guy who brought back the global gag rule on abortion, the guy who barred Planned Parenthood from receiving Title X funds, leaving six states without any Title X providers until the Biden administration reversed the rule in 2021, the guy who put three justices on the Supreme Court for the explicit purpose of overturning Roe v. Wade … now wants to be seen as a reasonable moderate on the issue. Sure.

    Via Rolling Stone:

    In recent weeks, according to two people familiar with the matter, Donald Trump has privately remarked that several anti-abortion leaders — people who spent the past year pushing him to commit to enacting a draconian national ban — now have no “leverage” to force him to do anything. […]

    According to the two sources and other Trump allies and aides familiar with the situation, Trump and his team are looking past the primary towards a general-election fight against President Joe Biden — and they think they can somehow run the former president as a supposed “moderate” (as three sources put it) on abortion, at least compared to the majority of the 2024 Republican field. For months, the sources tell Rolling Stone, Trump and some of his closest aides — such as top campaign adviser Susie Wiles — have planned for the ex-president to position himself in a way that “makes both Republicans and Democrats very happy,” as Trump is fond of saying.

    That does not seem like the kind of thing that is going to happen!

    […] As much as I would love to say that Trump would never be able to spin himself as a moderate on this issue … the fact that very few people actually thought he was a true believer on abortion and assumed he was only adopting the position in order to win as a Republican could actually work in his favor here. I’ve also learned to never say never when it comes to what people are willing to believe about Donald Trump. For many of his supporters, he was a Choose Your Own Adventure president who did and said every single thing they ever wanted, regardless of whether or not he did or said even one of them.

    That being said, “flip flopping” on abortion could actually make him seem weak to the people who specifically admired his macho tendency to refuse to admit wrongdoing, ever.

    Whatever position he ends up taking, it’s becoming increasingly clear that abortion is likely the issue that is going to decide the next election — and if that’s the case, he’s gonna get hurt no matter where he lands.

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/trump-thinks-hes-gonna-rebrand-as

  68. says

    Gaza war live updates: Hamas and Israel agree to extend truce by two days, Hamas says

    […] The IDF said the 11 hostages released by Hamas today are now with IDF forces and in Israel’s territory.

    “After they undergo an initial medical assessment of their health, our forces will accompany them until they are reunited with their families,” the IDF said in a statement.

    A spokesperson from kibbutz Nir Oz confirmed that all 11 hostages were from their community, which was attacked by Hamas on Oct. 7. The spokesperson noted that 49 community members remain in captivity in Gaza.

    […] The Palestine Red Crescent Society said in a post on X that its team is moving 40 trucks of aid into Gaza City and northern areas of the strip.

    Earlier today, the organization said it had delivered 150 trucks of aid into the northern part of the strip since the beginning of the temporary truce agreement on Friday. Distribution of aid into that area proved difficult as it was the hardest-hit area of Gaza as a result of Israel’s siege on the strip.

    […] A third group of wounded Palestinian children arrived in the United Arab Emirates today for treatment.

    The 93 children were flown to the UAE as part of the country’s promise to aid thousands of cancer patients and injured children.

    […] The current agreement between Hamas and Israel’s government is that Hamas will release Israeli women and children — 50 from the original four-day framework and 20 more in the next two days — in exchange for 150 Palestinian women and children in Israeli detention.

    Other countries, such as Thailand and Russia, have also brokered individual agreements for the release of their own citizens being held hostage in Gaza.

    […] Elon Musk has struck a deal with Israel that will formally limit use of potential Starlink satellite internet terminals in Gaza, the company’s minister of communications, Shlomo Karhi, said today.

    […] All broadband internet and phone calls in Gaza are routed through Israeli infrastructure. […]

  69. Reginald Selkirk says

    Rep. Kevin McCarthy Mocked For Historically Illiterate Tweet

    Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) may have led Congress, but he probably shouldn’t ever teach history.

    That’s the verdict after the former House speaker posted a tweet on Sunday that is getting mocked for its historical inaccuracy.

    McCarthy’s post on X (née Twitter) included a video in which he claim, inaccurately, that “in every single war that America has fought, we have never asked for land afterward — except for enough to bury the Americans who gave the ultimate sacrifice for freedom.” …

  70. says

    Reginald @98, all cyberattacks bother me, but the attacks on hospitals make me feel especially sick inside.

    In other news, Cartoon: The squeaker of the House visits Mar-a-Lago

  71. says

    CAN TAYLOR SWIFT HELP SAVE JOE BIDEN’s ASS?

    Mostly, it’s about Taylor Swift encouraging her fans to vote. She regularly reminds them to register to vote.

    Excerpts:

    […] “Taylor Swift is going to come out in the presidential election and she is going to mobilize her fans. And we’re going to be like, ‘Oh wow, where did all these young, female voters come from?’ We better have a plan for that.”– Charlie Kirk, founder and executive director, Turning Point USA

    Since 2018, Taylor Swift has encouraged young people to register to vote; to come out in support of President Joe Biden and Democrats in her home state of Tennessee, and has weighed in on the right-wing’s assault on abortion rights, trans rights, gay rights and any measures to deal with gun violence. In doing this she went against advice from friends and family who remembered the right wing trashing of the Dixie Chicks for their opposition to George W. Bush’s Iraq War.

    […] Swift commented on the risk of taking a political stand, “…what happened to the Dixie Chicks was real outrage. I registered it — that you’re always one comment away from being done being able to make music.” But she felt like she had to speak out.

    As the threat of a Trump autocracy looms in 2024, will Swift, the globe’s biggest star who has given her fans her heart and soul, once again stand strong for democracy in America?

    […] Swift was “adamant about pressing the button to send a nearly internet-breaking Instagram post, saying that [Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha] Blackburn has voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act as well as LGBTQ-friendly bills: [Tennessee Senator Marsha] Blackburn. Swift said that ‘I can’t see another commercial [with] her disguising these policies behind the words ‘Tennessee Christian values.’ I live in Tennessee. I am Christian. That’s not what we stand for.’” Willman noted that Swift “Pushing back tears, she lamented not having come out against Trump two years earlier, ‘but I can’t change that. … I need to be on the right side of history.

    […] Swift clearly understood that her father “[was] terrified of threats against my safety and my life, and he has to see how many stalkers we deal with on a daily basis, and know that this is his kid. It’s where he comes from.”

    Now that Gannett, the largest newspaper chain in the country, has hired a reporter to exclusively cover all things Taylor Swift and there are breathless wall-to-wall stories across social media about her ERAS tour and romance with Kansas City Chiefs football star, Travis Kelce, the world’s most popular pop star is perfectly positioned to use her platform. Granted, by opposing the rise of autocracy and criticizing right wing bigots, haters, and MAGA-ites, she might lose some of her fan base, and face threats to her health and well-being. But Lord knows she could lose half of her followers while still breaking box office records for a concert film, selling millions of records, and winning Grammy Awards by the bucketful.

    […] According to Politico’s Claudia Chiappa (https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-nightly/2023/09/29/the-unavoidable-politics-of-taylor-swift-00119201), “Swift’s ability to move political markets appears to be growing, […]

    Taylor Swift could be an influential player in the 2024 election cycle. Pro-democracy advocates need Swift — and her many friends in the music and entertainment industries — to mobilize youth in opposition to MAGA authoritarianism.

  72. says

    Followup to comment 100.

    Posted by readers of the article:

    […] her voice WILL matter because she has a HUGE following and her people are on the right side of history.

    But I just wanted to say that I am kinda annoyed at the framing of this Diary. I mean, Biden needs “saved” because he isn’t capable of winning without her help? Or he needs her to step in and save him because he can’t do it himself? Or he needs saved because he isn’t a good president?

    Look, I get that his polling numbers are not great, but I think that’s horse shit. I have posted many times that every presidential incumbent POTUS that won a second term since at least Reagan has had as bad or worse polling numbers as Biden. And, polling itself has some serious problems right now.

    I get that a lot of young people are pissed about Biden’s public stance in terms of the I/P situation, I am not excited about it either. But I believe a lot of young people will get over that when they remember that the GOP is coming for their bodies (either with anti-abortion legislation or with odious gun laws).

    […] saying that she is going to “save Biden’s ass” is pretty discourteous to our president.
    ———————
    The media hypes any poll that shows Biden losing to TRump
    ————————–
    I am a fan of her using her voice to save democracy!
    —————————
    Joe is saving his own ass by being an extremely effective President, as well as the alternative to Trump. Since the media doesn’t seem to interested, he certainly can use the help of anyone who recognizes the truth and helps to publicize it. Taylor Swift can be one very helpful such person, but it takes all of us. With all he has accomplished (Infrastructure bill, Chips bill, economic recovery, judicial appointments, rebuilding NATO, Ukraine assistance, Gaza cease fire, ect.) he has a record to be proud of.
    ————————–
    Our local League of Women Voters gave Taylor an award for registering 35,000 young folks, during her Eras tour, nearly as many as the entire LWV was able to register in a year of trying. As the League is nonpartisan, it ostensibly doesn’t care which party they’re registering with or who they intend to vote for. But let’s be honest, we know who most of them will vote for and it won’t be Orange Julius Caesar. If Taylor stays in that lane — voting is patriotic — she shouldn’t bring any recriminations down on herself a la The Dixie Chicks.

  73. says

    Wall Street Journal:

    Iran continued to expand its nuclear program, including its stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium in recent months, although it hasn’t accelerated the pace of its production of nuclear fuel amid the current turmoil in the Middle East.

  74. Reginald Selkirk says

    Ukrainian spy chief’s wife poisoned, media reports say

    The wife of Ukraine’s military intelligence chief has been poisoned with heavy metals, several Ukrainian media outlets reported on Tuesday, citing unnamed intelligence sources.

    Marianna Budanova is the wife of Kyrylo Budanov, who heads Ukrainian military intelligence agency GUR, which has been prominently involved in clandestine operations against Russian forces throughout the 21-month war…

  75. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 100

    I am Christian. That’s not what we stand for.

    I’ve got a two-thousand-year-old heap of murdered people who would disagree, you supersticous scut.

  76. Reginald Selkirk says

    Europol arrest hackers allegedly behind string of ransomware attacks

    Europol and its international law enforcement partners have arrested five individuals who authorities accuse of involvement in a string of ransomware attacks affecting more than 1,800 victims worldwide.

    The arrested individuals, which include the criminal gang’s ringleader, 32, and four of his “most active” accomplices, were arrested following a series of raids at 30 properties across Ukraine last week, Europol said in a statement on Tuesday. The suspects were not named…

    The arrests are the latest in a years-long investigation that in 2021 saw 12 individuals arrested in raids in Ukraine and Switzerland. Europol said in its announcement Tuesday that its earlier actions subsequently “facilitated the identification of the suspects targeted during the action last week in Kyiv.” …

  77. says

    John Kelly served as Donald Trump’s White House chief of staff for 17 months. Now he’s practically begging people not to vote for the former president.

    In Bob Woodward’s first book on Donald Trump’s presidency, the author highlighted a meeting in which then-White House Chief of Staff John Kelly reportedly said of the-then president, “He’s an idiot. It’s pointless to try to convince him of anything. He’s gone off the rails. We’re in Crazytown. I don’t even know why any of us are here.”

    And while that was certainly an unflattering comment, it was a private and unconfirmed exchange. That said, what Kelly has been willing to say on the record has been nearly as striking. The Washington Post published this report last week:

    John F. Kelly, the longest-serving chief of staff in President Donald Trump’s White House, watches Trump dominate the GOP primary with increasing despair. “What’s going on in the country that a single person thinks this guy would still be a good president when he’s said the things he’s said and done the things he’s done?” Kelly said in a recent interview. “It’s beyond my comprehension he has the support he has.”

    The retired four-star general went on to tell the Post, “I came out and told people the awful things he said about wounded soldiers, and it didn’t have half a day’s bounce. … If anything, his numbers go up. It might even move the needle in the wrong direction. I think we’re in a dangerous zone in our country.”

    The comments come on the heels of Kelly telling CNN that Trump privately disparaged U.S. troops, has “no idea what America stands for,” and has “nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law.”

    These were not casual asides. As regular readers know, after Trump left the White House, Kelly, the man who served as the Republican president’s chief of staff for 17 months, has struggled to contain his contempt for his former boss. Over the last few years, the retired Marine general, who also served as Trump’s Homeland Security secretary, has accused Trump of, among other things, “poisoning” people’s minds, having “serious character issues,” and not being “a real man.”

    Just as notably, Kelly has also raised concerns about Trump’s abuses while in office. Last fall, for example, Kelly told The New York Times that Trump, during his presidency, told his chief of staff to use the Internal Revenue Service and the Justice Department to target his critics and perceived political foes.

    It’s against this backdrop that Kelly seems absolutely baffled as to why anyone in their right minds would even consider supporting his former boss.

    I’m mindful of the fact that Trump’s followers reflexively distrust the Republican’s opponents, but it’s worth reemphasizing that Kelly isn’t a pundit, scholar, or elected official — he’s the man Trump personally tapped to oversee his White House.

    He’s also the man who appears to be practically begging people not to vote for the former president.

  78. says

    Tommy Tuberville’s position has evolved from targeting travel reimbursements, to attacking military officers themselves, to condemning the military itself.

    Earlier this month, several Senate Republicans decided they’d seen enough of Sen. Tommy Tuberville’s unprecedented blockade on confirming U.S. military leaders. In fact, these GOP members publicly accused the Alabama Republican of, among other things, being dishonest, damaging the military during international crises, assisting U.S. adversaries abroad, and relying on tactics that are “ridiculous” and “dumb.”

    If the goal was to encourage the far-right senator to be more responsible, those efforts have apparently fallen short. HuffPost reported overnight:

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) is coming under fire after he insulted the U.S. military on Monday evening. “We’ve got the weakest military that we’ve had in your or my lifetime,” he told Newsmax’s Eric Bolling as he complained about diversity initiatives. “Infiltrating our military is all this wokeness.”

    There was, of course, a degree of irony to the circumstances: The politician responsible for weakening the military whined on national television about the military being weak.

    Soon after, former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois said Tuberville isn’t just wrong; he’s “an idiot.”

    Putting questions about the Alabaman’s intellect aside, I’m struck by the broader shift in Tuberville’s tactics. Following up on our earlier coverage, the senator’s original position was indefensible, but it was at least consistent. In the wake of Roe v. Wade’s demise, the Pentagon created a travel-reimbursement policy for servicemembers who needed to travel for reproductive health care.

    The Alabama Republican insisted that the policy is “illegal” (it’s not), and further argued that the Defense Department was paying for abortions (which was also untrue). The result was a radical tactic: For the first time in American history, a senator imposed a blanket hold that made it effectively impossible for the Senate to confirm U.S. military promotions in large numbers.

    The right-wing coach-turned-politician made his position clear: The military nominees — who have broad, bipartisan support — could advance just as soon as the Pentagon eliminates these benefits for servicemembers and aligns military policies with his regressive beliefs. DOD leaders have balked, and the result has been a nearly year-long blockade without precedent.

    But Tuberville’s position has subtly evolved over time. The Alabaman used to attack a specific benefit the military made available to active-duty troops. In the late summer, however, the Republican started attacking high-ranking military officers themselves.

    Now, Tuberville is going a step further, condemning his own country’s military for having descended into “weakness.”

    It’s tempting to explore in detail all of the many substantive reasons the senator is wrong, but there really isn’t much of a point: Tuberville doesn’t take his own positions seriously, so there’s little reason for anyone else to respond to them as if he were a mature policymaker.

    The larger question, meanwhile, is what, if anything, senators can do to circumvent the Republican’s efforts.

    Two weeks ago, the Senate Rules Committee advanced a measure — that’s being referred to as a “patch” — which would temporarily empower members to confirm pending military nominees, crushing Tuberville’s blockade. In a letter to colleagues on Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he’d bring up the resolution “in the coming weeks,” clearing the way for confirmations before the new year.

    The trouble, of course, is that the measure would still need 60 votes, which means nine GOP senators would have to side with Democrats in support of the military. While Republican criticisms of Tuberville are becoming more common — even Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas recently conceded that the Alabaman’s tactics are hurting the armed forces — it’s not yet clear whether those votes will materialize over the next month. Watch this space.

  79. says

    Followup to comment 94.

    […] “My predecessor, once again — God love him — called for cuts that could rip away health insurance for tens of millions of Americans on Medicaid,” Biden said at a White House event. […]

    Biden’s public comments coincided with a written statement from the president’s re-election campaign. “Forty million people — more than 1 in 10 Americans — have health insurance today because of the Affordable Care Act and Donald Trump just said he would try to rip it away if he returns to power,” spokesperson Ammar Moussa said. “He was one vote away from getting it done when he was president — and we should take him at his word that he’ll try to do it again.

    “That means letting insurance companies deny coverage to people with preexisting conditions like diabetes, cancer, or asthma; kicking college kids off their parents’ coverage the moment they graduate; leaving a job once again resulting in a loss of coverage; premiums skyrocketing; and middle class families suffering. Donald Trump’s America is one where millions of people lose their health insurance and seniors and families across the country face exorbitant costs just to stay healthy. Those are the stakes next November.”

    This was soon followed by a lengthy memo from White House Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates on the same issue.

    Soon after, the Biden campaign announced a press call with House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi and North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper in order to “highlight the devastating impact that a Trump and MAGA repeal of the Affordable Care Act would have on millions of Americans.”

    The aforementioned Post report added, “The campaign will run new TV ads this week in swing states to highlight the president’s efforts to lower prices for some prescription drugs and spotlight Trump’s call to repeal the Affordable Care Act.”

    If Democrats were to have literally written a script for Trump to follow, they probably would’ve had the Republican pick a fight over the future of the ACA. It was awfully generous of him to play along for no apparent reason.

    Link

  80. says

    In a new report this morning, Katherine Faulders et al. of ABC News describe what former Vice President Mike Pence has told Special Counsel Jack Smith.

    […] the ABC News team paints a picture of detailed questioning of Pence by investigators and a more granular (but not inconsistent) account of what Pence has already said publicly. The sources almost surely come from Pence’s circle, as the report goes so far as to use quotations purportedly from Pence.

    According to the ABC News report, Pence told investigators that:

    Trump surrounded himself with “crank” attorneys, espoused “un-American” legal theories, and almost pushed the country toward a “constitutional crisis.”

    Pence briefly considered not showing up for the Jan. 6 certification by Congress of the Electoral College vote.

    Trump privately asked Pence for his advice, and Pence told him that if nothing changed, “[you] should simply accept the results,” “you should take a bow,” travel the country to thank supporters, “and then run again if you want.”

    After Trump re-tweeted a memo titled ‘Operation PENCE CARD,’ Pence turned to his wife and said, “Here we go.”

    Trump “acted recklessly” as the Capitol was under siege, but Pence will “never believe” Trump meant for Jan. 6 to become violent.

    Link

    So, Pence remains partially delusional.

  81. says

    Idaho Asks Supreme Court To Let It Fully Impose Punitive Abortion Ban During Appeal

    Idaho asked the Supreme Court Monday to stay a lower court injunction, or to take up its case directly, as it attempts to fend off the Biden administration’s challenge of the state’s abortion ban.

    The government filed suit in August 2022, arguing that Idaho’s abortion ban — which includes penalties for providers who perform abortions — runs afoul of Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).

    Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra published a memo shortly after the Dobbs decision reminding hospitals that EMTALA requires them to perform abortions as part of emergency stabilizing care. Idaho’s ban prohibits abortions except when necessary to prevent the pregnant woman’s death.

    The government has argued that the gap between those two requirements is large, and that EMTALA preempts the abortion ban in those cases. That argument won at the district court level, and a judge enjoined Idaho’s ban where it conflicts with EMTALA. A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel, composed of three Donald Trump appointees, lifted the injunction in September. The government immediately moved for emergency reconsideration by the Ninth Circuit en banc, which vacated the panel order and denied Idaho’s request to impose its ban in those emergency situations during the appeals process.

    Now, Idaho is going to the Supreme Court for permission to fully enforce its ban.

    In its new filing, the state rails against the Ninth Circuit’s “unreasoned order,” its “pulling the case away from a panel that had thoroughly considered the merits of Idaho’s stay application” and the federal government’s “unauthorized power grab.”

    […] “The district court’s injunction effectively turns EMTALA’s protection for the uninsured into a federal super-statute on the issue of abortion, one that strips Idaho of its sovereign interest in protecting innocent human life and turns emergency rooms into a federal enclave where state standards of care do not apply,” Idaho’s lawyers fumed.

    […] The Supreme Court could — if it’s disinclined to grant the stay — take up the case directly instead and add a high-profile abortion showdown to the docket this term, Idaho’s lawyers suggested. […]

  82. says

    Followup to comment 111

    […] According to ABC’s unnamed sources, Pence repeatedly insisted on his continuing loyalty to Trump, saying, “My only higher loyalty was to God and the Constitution.” […]

    “Not feeling like I should attend electoral count,” Pence wrote in his notes in late December. “Too many questions, too many doubts, too hurtful to my friend. Therefore I’m not going to participate in certification of election.”

    […] It was Pence’s son, a Marine, who reportedly convinced him to go to the Capitol and preside over the certification. He said, “Dad, you took the same oath I took,” which is to say, “an oath to support and defend the Constitution.”

    The emphasis on Pence’s regret and abiding loyalty to Trump—as well as the overall lack of leaks from the special counsel’s office—strongly suggest that ABC’s sources were from the Pence camp. If so, the continuing effort to show that he was a good Trump loyalist to the end, despite his principled and pained conclusion that President Joe Biden was the legitimate winner in 2020 and that the Constitution did not permit Pence as vice president to overturn that election, is just sad. “Too hurtful to my friend,” wrote the man whose “friend” weeks later sent a mob chanting, “Hang Mike Pence.”

    Ah, but about that:

    According to sources, when Pence spoke with Smith’s team earlier this year, he said Trump’s words that morning “didn’t help,” and he said Trump “acted recklessly” as the Capitol was under siege. But Pence also said he will “never believe” Trump meant for Jan. 6 to become violent.

    Sure, Mike.

    ABC also reports that Pence emphasized the conversations in which he told Trump that he could not alter the election results and that he did not believe there had been fraud that altered the election results. He also said there is “no doubt” that Trump “knew what I thought of” outside attorneys like Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani, who were encouraging Trump to believe he’d won even as the White House attorneys told him he’d lost.

    Trump is currently scheduled to be tried on these charges in March. This report could be a preview of any testimony Pence might give in that trial. If so, expect the sanctimony to be laid on with a trowel. But it’s worth it, because he really can show that Trump had every reason to know that he lost, and that Trump’s denial was willful and implausible.

    Link

  83. lumipuna says

    Update: Finland just decided to close the entire Russian border for two weeks, starting Wednesday afternoon (nominally Thursday midnight, but the one remaining border station already has very limited opening hours). In this plan, all border stations will tentatively open in mid December. The original partial border closure was tentatively planned for three months.

    The last couple days have seen almost no asylum seekers crossing the border. I have a hunch that Russia will now hold the migrants, rather than sending them hiking across a closed border, aiming to make the border closure look ridiculous and unnecessary and impractical and politically divisive, to ensure it won’t be extended beyond a couple weeks. Then when the easily accessible border stations open in mid December, the whole cycle starts again.

  84. lumipuna says

    As a side note, Thursday (30 November) is the 84th anniversary of the beginning of Winter War. Those who still use Twitter can follow the day-by-day events from @RealtimeWWII, where the six-year cycle has just rolled over back to 1939.

    Also, just as in 1939, the winter in Finland has started out relatively early and cold. Most of the rest of the world is wildly overheated, though.

  85. Akira MacKenzie says

    @108

    The retired four-star general went on to tell the Post, “I came out and told people the awful things he said about wounded soldiers, and it didn’t have half a day’s bounce. … If anything, his numbers go up. It might even move the needle in the wrong direction.”

    Because they don’t believe you. For decades the right has vilified the press as propagandists and liars. Is it any wonder why they would rush to defend their savior against Kelly’s “treasonous” claims about our Dear Leader?

  86. says

    Rupert Murdoch is set to be questioned under oath on Tuesday and Wednesday as part of voting technology company Smartmatic’s $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox Corp (FOXA.O) over coverage of debunked vote-rigging claims involving the 2020 U.S. presidential election, a person familiar with the matter said.

    Murdoch will be deposed in Los Angeles, according to that person, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The deposition does not appear on the public docket for the case.

    […] Florida-based Smartmatic is seeking damages from Fox Corp, Fox News and five individuals: Rudolph Giuliani and Sidney Powell, who were lawyers for Republican former President Donald Trump; and Fox hosts Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro, as well as former Fox host Lou Dobbs.

    Smartmatic alleges in its lawsuit filed in state court in New York that the defendants knowingly spread false claims that the company’s software was used to flip votes in favor of Democrat Joe Biden and against Trump.

    Link

  87. says

    Russian Court Extends Detention of WSJ Reporter
    Wall Street Journal link
    Evan Gershkovich has been in custody since March and denies an allegation of espionage

    A Russian court ruled to extend the detention of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich for a third time since he was taken into custody in March on an allegation of espionage that he, the Journal and the U.S. government vehemently deny.

    The decision followed a judge’s ruling in August to grant the request of investigators from the Federal Security Service, or FSB, that Gershkovich remains behind bars awaiting trial until Nov. 30. Tuesday’s ruling lengthens his detention through at least Jan. 30, by which time he will have been held for 10 months.

    The Journal said it continued to stand with Gershkovich and called for his immediate release.

    “Evan has now been unjustly imprisoned for nearly 250 days, and every day is a day too long,” the Journal said in a statement. “The accusations against him are categorically false and his continued imprisonment is a brazen and outrageous attack on a free press, which is critical for a free society.”

    The U.S. Embassy in Moscow also criticized the extension of Gershkovich’s detention.

    “Today, U.S. Embassy representatives attended the hearing of wrongfully detained WSJ journalist Evan Gershkovich at the Lefortovo Court. We are deeply concerned by the court’s decision to extend his detention for an additional two months,” it said on its Telegram messaging service channel. “Evan has already been in pretrial detention without legal grounds for almost eight months. We reiterate our call for Evan’s immediate release.”

    Gershkovich, a 32-year-old U.S. citizen who was accredited by Russia’s Foreign Ministry to work as a journalist, was detained by FSB agents on March 29 during a reporting trip. Russian investigators haven’t publicly presented evidence to back up their espionage allegation against Gershkovich, who is being held at Moscow’s Lefortovo prison. […]

  88. says

    Hunter Biden asks to testify publicly. House Republicans scurry away in a panic

    After months of being treated as a punching bag by Republicans in the House and by right-wing media, Hunter Biden has reacted to a Republican subpoena by offering to testify in person before the House Oversight Committee that’s supposedly looking into allegations of misconduct by President Joe Biden and members of his family. It’s a direct challenge to Republican committee Chair James Comer and to the GOP’s ongoing efforts to create an excuse to impeach the president.

    Hunter Biden’s testimony could be one of the greatest “put up or shut up” moments of the century.

    Except it’s not going to happen. It’s not happening because the offer to testify in public and answer any question that Republicans wanted to ask was met with a refusal from Comer. The last thing the House Oversight chair wants in his committee is the truth.

    According to Hunter’s attorney, David Lowell, the president’s son is willing to sit for the committee on “December 13, or any date in December that we can arrange.” And he has just one requirement: That testimony has to be public, so everyone gets to hear what Republicans ask and what Hunter has to say in response. “All you will learn is that your accusations are baseless,” writes Lowell. “However, the American people should see that for themselves.”

    That’s exactly what terrifies Comer. As CNN reports, the Republican congressman who has been making outrageous claims about the Biden family for months quickly rejected the idea of public testimony. “Hunter Biden is trying to play by his own rules instead of following the rules required of everyone else,” said Comer. “That won’t stand with House Republicans.”

    Instead, Comer insists that Hunter must appear before Republicans in private so that they can frame information released about both questions and answers in the way they best suits their “investigation.” Republican Rep. Ben Cline followed Comer’s refusal by maintaining that Hunter’s offer to testify in public was part of a Democratic scheme to block Comer’s investigation.

    Because, as everyone knows, open public testimony is something that a Republican investigation simply cannot tolerate.

    Hunter has been the subject of continuous attacks since Rudy Giuliani first strolled into The New York Times in 2019 and handed them an utterly ridiculous story about Hunter, his father, and a corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine. That story was rapidly and thoroughly debunked, but that hasn’t kept Republicans from citing it as fact from that day until the present. Just days before the 2020 election, Giuliani announced that he had obtained “Hunter Biden’s laptop”—a phrase that has now been promoted thousands of times by Donald Trump, Republicans in the House and Senate, right-wing media, and Elon Musk. Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene went so far as to brandish revenge porn taken from this nonexistent laptop on the floor of the House.

    The combined effort of Republicans, their supporters, and the media to crush Hunter may be the most jaw-dropping example of the lengths to which the right will go in an effort to find some reason, any reason, to defame Joe Biden. In the past few weeks, Comer has been dribbling out already well-established information one crumb at a time, treating each piece as if it’s some kind of revelation and throwing claims of corruption at multiple members of the Biden family.

    And that’s exactly what Comer and others intend to do over the coming months. They have no interest in the truth, and no interest in what Hunter Biden has to say. They only want to preserve their ability to pretend to “investigate” by way of smear.

    Rep. Jamie Raskin issued a response to Comer’s insistence that his work can only be carried out in darkness:

    “Let me get this straight. After wailing and moaning for ten months about Hunter Biden and alluding to some vast unproven family conspiracy, after sending Hunter Biden a subpoena to appear and testify, Chairman Comer and the Oversight Republicans now reject his offer to appear before the full Committee and the eyes of the world and to answer any questions that they pose? What an epic humiliation for our colleagues and what a frank confession that they are simply not interested in the facts and have no confidence in their own case or the ability of their own Members to pursue it. After the miserable failure of their impeachment hearing in September, Chairman Comer has now apparently decided to avoid all Committee hearings where the public can actually see for itself the logical, rhetorical and factual contortions they have tied themselves up in. The evidence has shown time and again President Biden has committed no wrongdoing, much less an impeachable offense. Chairman Comer’s insistence that Hunter Biden’s interview should happen behind closed doors proves it once again. What the Republicans fear most is sunlight and the truth.”

  89. says

    Tyrant Joe Biden Reforms Welfare, Won’t Let States Steal From Poor To Build Volleyball Palaces

    Or blow welfare funds on abstinence education, private colleges, etc.

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/tyrant-joe-biden-reforms-welfare

    We love it when the Biden administration just out of nowhere solves problems that may not make the nightly news, but that have real impacts on people’s lives, like how last year Health and Human Services fixed a glitch in the design of Obamacare that had kept about a million people from being able to get coverage. No drama, no midnight vigils outside the White House: instead, people at HHS looked at the problem, proposed new administrative rules, and voila, a big headache for some Americans was gone. That’s happened with a lot of small fixes to student loans, too, in addition to the bigger loan forgiveness packages the administration has pursued.

    This is what happens when you staff up an administration with smart people who want to solve problems. […] closing a huge loophole that allowed states to divert federal antipoverty funds to governors’ pet projects, like promoting abstinence, holding “heathy marriage” classes that did nothing to prevent out-of-wedlock births, funding anti-abortion “clinics” to lie about abortion “risks,” sending middle-class kids to private colleges, and other schemes only tangentially related to helping poor kids. It’s the same loophole that Mississippi officials tried to drive a truck through to divert welfare funds to former sportsball man Brett Favre’s alma mater, for a volleyball palace. That scandal made enough headlines that the administration’s plan to fix the loophole just might get covered beyond policy nerds, even.

    At the root of the problem is some vague language around the program that used to be called “welfare” but which was rebranded Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) in Bill Clinton’s 1996 “Welfare reform” law. TANF normally gave cash assistance to low-income families, to use for basic living expenses. But under the 1986 “reform,” states were allowed to take their TANF block grants and allocate them to other programs that ostensibly assist low-income families with kids. Over the years, while some states still provided cash assistance, others shifted the funds to other budget slots, rationalizing almost any spending as somehow helping poor kids. Mississippi claimed that new volleyball stadium might prevent poverty by encouraging poors to adopt exercise and healthy eating habits, for instance.

    ProPublica detailed the widespread abuse of TANF funds in a series of stories in 2021, explaining how Utah’s public assistance rules convinced some families they had to join the LDS church to get help, and how Arizona used TANF funds for child welfare investigations of needy parents — effectively “helping” poor families by breaking them up. Some states didn’t spend the funds at all, simply hoarding parts of their TANF grants.

    So yeah, said the Biden folks at the Administration for Children and Families, let’s fix that! The agency has proposed new rules — open for public comment until December 1 — aimed at nudging states to actually use TANF funds to give cash to needy parents, not fill budget holes or punish poor people.

    One change will put an end to the scheme Utah used to substitute LDS church funds for welfare, by prohibiting states

    from counting charitable giving by private organizations, such as churches and food banks, as “state” spending on welfare, a practice that has allowed legislatures to budget less for programs for low-income families while still claiming to meet federal minimums.

    Another new rule will put the kibosh on using TANF to fund child protective services or foster care programs, which are not what TANF is supposed to be for, damn it.

    And then there’s the simple matter of making sure that funds for needy families go to needy families, not to pet projects that have little to do with poverty:

    The reforms would also redefine the term “needy” to refer only to families with incomes at or below 200% of the federal poverty line. Currently, some states spend TANF money on programs like college scholarships — or volleyball stadiums — that benefit more affluent people.

    Guess the real “Welfare Queens” were the state bureaucrats who robbed poor families to help people who didn’t need it, huh?

    But wait, there’s more! Instead of allowing states to write up flimsy rationalizations for how a Don’t-Fuck-Before-Marriage Summer Camp might benefit poor families, states would have to

    provide concrete evidence, including social science research or real-world examples, showing that they are using their TANF spending in ways that truly help families in need.

    And the best way to do that, the government writes in its announcement of the proposed rule, is to do what TANF was originally set up for: giving cash assistance to needy families, because it works, even if you’re sure they’ll just blow it on booze, drugs, and My Little Pony collectibles. That’s just wrong, you see:

    [We] remind states that there is a large body of research that shows that cash assistance is a critically important tool for reducing family and child poverty. Studies have found that when families receive TANF and are more financially secure, they are less likely to be involved in the child welfare system.

    When this new rule goes into effect, states will still have some flexibility if they want to use TANF grants for something other than direct cash assistance. But they’ll need to show that poor families really are benefitting, or they’ll be penalized. […]

  90. says

    From The Washington Post: Koch network endorses Nikki Haley for president as it looks to stop Trump

    The powerful political network led by conservative billionaire Charles Koch endorsed Nikki Haley for president on Tuesday, as it looks to stop Donald Trump from being the Republican nominee.

    Americans for Prosperity Action, the network’s flagship political group, announced the group’s first endorsement of its type in a presidential race. In 2015, the Koch network identified five approved presidential candidates, all of whom fell to Trump.

    […] The endorsement comes just under seven weeks before the first nominating contest in Iowa, with Trump in command of the race there and in other early states. Haley, the former U.N. ambassador and governor of South Carolina, has gained momentum in the Republican primary and has in many ways surpassed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as the top alternative to Trump. […]

  91. says

    Paul Krugman, writing for The New York Times: Nikki Haley Is Coming for Your Retirement

    It feels like years ago, but actually only a few months have passed since many big Republican donors seemed to believe that Ron DeSantis could effectively challenge Donald Trump for the Republican nomination. It has been an edifying spectacle — an object lesson in the reality that great wealth need not be associated with good judgment, about politics or anything else.

    At this point, both conventional wisdom and prediction markets say that Trump has a virtual lock on the nomination. But Wall Street isn’t completely resigned to Trump’s inevitability; there has been a late surge in big-money support for Nikki Haley, a former governor of South Carolina. And there is, to be fair, still a chance that Trump — who is facing many criminal charges and whose public rants have become utterly unhinged — will manage to crash and burn before securing the nomination.

    So it seems worth looking at what Haley stands for.

    From a political point of view, one answer might be: nothing. A recent Times profile described her as having “an ability to calibrate her message to the moment.” A less euphemistic way to put this is that she seems willing to say whatever might work to her political advantage. “Flip-flopping” doesn’t really convey the sheer cynicism with which she has shifted her rhetoric and changed her positions on everything from abortion rights to immigration to whether it’s OK to try to overturn a national election.

    And anyone hoping that she would govern as a moderate if she should somehow make it to the White House is surely delusional. Haley has never really shown a willingness to stand up to Republican extremists — and at this point the whole G.O.P. has been taken over by extremists.

    That said, Haley has shown some consistency on issues of economic and fiscal policy. And what you should know is that her positions on these issues are pretty far to the right. In particular, she seems exceptionally explicit, even among would-be Republican nominees, in calling for an increase in the age at which Americans become eligible for Social Security — a bad idea that seems to be experiencing a revival.

    So let’s talk about Social Security.

    The first thing you should know about Social Security is that the actual numbers don’t justify the apocalyptic rhetoric one often hears, not just from the right but also from self-proclaimed centrists who want to sound serious. No, the exhaustion of the system’s trust fund, currently projected to occur in roughly a decade, wouldn’t mean that benefits disappear.

    It would mean that the system would need additional revenue to continue paying scheduled benefits in full. But the extra revenue required would be smaller than you probably think. The most recent long-term projections from the Congressional Budget Office show Social Security outlays rising to 6.2 percent of gross domestic product in 2053 from 5.1 percent this year, not exactly an earth-shattering increase.

    It’s true that the budget office projects a much bigger rise in spending on Medicare and other major health programs. But much of this projected rise reflects the assumption that medical costs will rise much faster than economic growth, which has been true in the past but need not be true in the future. Indeed, since 2010, Medicare spending has been far less than expected. And there is every reason to believe that smart policies could further curb health care costs, given how much more America spends than other wealthy nations.

    Still, Social Security does face a funding gap. How should it be closed?

    Anyone who says, as Haley does, that the retirement age should rise in line with increasing life expectancy is being oblivious, perhaps willfully, to the grim inequality of modern America. Until Covid struck, average life expectancy at 65, the relevant number, was indeed rising. But these gains were concentrated among Americans with relatively high incomes. Less affluent Americans — those who depend most on Social Security — have seen little increase in life expectancy and, in some cases, declines.

    So anyone invoking rising life expectancy as a reason to delay Social Security benefits is, in effect, saying that aging janitors must keep working (or be cast into extreme poverty) because bankers are living longer.

    How, then, should the Social Security gap be closed? The obvious answer — which happens to be favored by a majority of voters — is to raise more revenue. Remember, America collects less revenue as a percentage of G.D.P. than almost any other advanced economy.

    But Haley, of course, wants to cut income taxes.

    […] I would beg political reporters not to focus on Haley’s personal affect, which can seem moderate, but rather on her policies. […] On fiscal and economic policy, she’s a hard-right advocate of tax cuts for the rich and benefit cuts for the working class. […]

  92. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    @Lynna #92:

    One of the features of this variant of the “settler colonialism” construct is that any resistance by definition justified. […] One side of the conflict (Israel) is incapable of acting in self-defense because they are inherently the aggressor […] ubiquitous claims of “genocide” are fruit of the same totalizing ideology. […] They amount to a premeditated slander […] If these are the terms of the debate, if these are the stakes, then no settlement is possible

    Gasp slander! Better keep killing then. A world-class military carpet bombing starving children has no business being so violently fragile.

  93. says

    Nazi flags and SS history book found in Ohio Walmart shooter’s house

    Nazi flags and a Schutzstaffel history book were among the items found in the home of the Ohio Walmart shooter who earlier this month wounded four people before killing himself, records show.

    The FBI previously said Benjamin Charles Jones, 20, may have been at least partly inspired by violent, racist ideology based on journal writings and other evidence collected after he opened fire at the Beavercreek Walmart on Nov. 20. Details about the writings and other items were not detailed in a statement at the time.

    However, court documents now indicate Beavercreek police detectives seized a total of 18 items, including two Nazi flags, the Schutzstaffel — or SS — history book, a shooting complex card, handwritten notes, electronics and a blue folder containing documents, during a search of Jones’ home in Dayton. […]

    The investigation into the shooting is ongoing.

  94. Reginald Selkirk says

    Home Depot billionaire says he’d likely still fund Trump if candidate convicted

    Republican mega-donor Bernie Marcus said on Tuesday he would likely still give money to Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential bid if the former president was convicted of a crime – but the billionaire does not plan to be one of his biggest financial backers.

    Marcus, a co-founder of home improvement retailer The Home Depot, announced earlier this month that he was supporting Trump, the runaway frontrunner for the 2024 Republican nomination contest that kicks off on Jan. 15 in Iowa…

    TAX THE RICH

  95. says

    Ex-girlfriend of Vermont shooting suspect reported his alleged harassment to police

    A former girlfriend of the man accused of shooting three Palestinian college students in Vermont once told police he was harassing her with messages “sexual in nature” — but stopped short of pressing charges against him, law enforcement records showed.

    The then-36-year-old woman called police in DeWitt, New York, on Oct. 21, 2019, telling them Jason Eaton had been sending her “numerous text messages, emails and phone calls,” according to a department report obtained by NBC News on Tuesday.

    […] College students and longtime friends Hisham Awartani, Kinnan Abdalhamid and Tahseen Ali Ahmad were staying with Awartani’s family in Vermont for the Thanksgiving holiday when they were shot.the woman made it clear she didn’t want “to communicate with him or see him anymore,” according to police in the Syracuse suburb.

    Awartani is a junior at Brown University, while Abdalhamid runs track at Haverford College and Ahmad attends Trinity College. The three have known one another since their days at Ramallah Friends School in the occupied West Bank.

    The victims’ loved ones said they wanted the young men to spend the holidays in Vermont, fearing the West Bank would be dangerous.

    An attorney for Eaton declined to comment Tuesday. The defendant pleaded not guilty to three counts of second-degree attempted murder Monday.

    Police have yet to say whether racial animus played any role in Saturday’s attack.

    However, the victims’ loved ones said they’re convinced the college students “were targeted simply for being Palestinian,” according to a joint statement Tuesday. […]

  96. Reginald Selkirk says

    Judge recuses himself from Elon Musk’s case against Media Matters

    The judge presiding over tech billionaire Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Media Matters for America has recused himself from the case, according to court documents.

    In a notice filed with the court on Tuesday, Judge Mark Pittman of the U.S. District Court in Northern Texas wrote that he was recusing himself from the case and requested the clerk of the court assign it to another judge.

    Pittman, who was appointed to his position by former President Trump, did not give a reason for stepping away, and it was not immediately clear why the request was made.

    Federal judges are mandated to recuse themselves when their “impartiality might reasonably be questioned,” including when they have a financial interest or personal bias…

  97. says

    Well that’s just stupid.

    Texas AG’s office argues women should sue doctors — not state — over lack of abortion access

    Lawyers in the Texas attorney general’s office said Tuesday that women should sue their doctors, not the state, over a lack of access to abortion in defending the state’s strict law.

    Beth Klusmann of the Texas Attorney General’s Office made that point in oral arguments before the state Supreme Court in a case challenging Texas’s abortion ban, which bars doctors from providing abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected — typically around six weeks into pregnancy — with exceptions only for cases in which the life of the mother is at risk.

    […] The lawsuit in Zurawski v. Texas was brought by 22 women who said that state law had forced them to carry nonviable and dangerous pregnancies to term — in other words, to go through the ordeal of pregnancy with a fetus that would not survive, and that in many cases was putting them at serious risk.

    The suit brought by the Center for Reproductive Freedom charges that many of the 22 women were denied care because, despite the severity of the damage that the nonviable pregnancy was doing their body, doctors told them they weren’t quite sick enough for it to be clearly life threatening.

    Forty businesses have also signed a brief in support of the suit — arguing that ambiguities in the law have incurred a substantial financial cost: nearly $15 billion in lost revenues, and businesses and employees leaving the state.
    The plaintiffs argued that the 2021 law flew in the face of a long history of doctors being allowed to determine when abortion was necessary to preserve the health of the mother under state law — even when the procedure, in general, was not legal.

    They contended that while the legislation included language intended to allow abortions in life-threatening cases, it was so vaguely worded — and its penalties so harsh — that it amounted to a total ban that threatened the lives of mothers already carrying babies who would not survive.

    […] Senate Bill 8 exposed Texas doctors to harsh penalties — potential life in prison, loss of their medical license and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines — if they perform an abortion on a fetus with a heartbeat.

    “The abortion bans, as they exist today, subject physicians like my clients to the most penalties imaginable,” Duane said.

    That ban holds even for complicated pregnancies where the fetus would not survive birth — something that in August caused a district judge to block the prosecution of doctors who performed abortions in those cases.

    The same day that ruling came down, the office of Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) appealed it to the state Supreme Court — effectively keeping the ban in place.

    […] In court, the state argued that the 22 women suing the state were the wrong plaintiffs going after the wrong target.

    First, Klusmann argued that the women had no standing to challenge the 2021 law — because it targeted doctors, not pregnant women themselves.

    Second, she argued that women with complicated and dangerous pregnancies should have no problem obtaining abortions under the law, and that they should be taking up their grievances with the doctors who had denied them the procedures they now argued were medically necessary rather than the state.

    A woman risking death if she doesn’t get an abortion, Klusmann argued, would clearly “qualify for a medical emergency exemption. And so, if she has to come to court to make that happen, that is not the state’s fault.”

    [snipped many examples of the Texas law simply not working in real life, and of the law putting women’s lives in danger]

    For the state, Klusmann argued that these cases — which the Legislature sought to avert with its language about protecting the life of the mother — did not rise to the level of a constitutional issue.

    “The Legislature decided to value unborn life and prohibit abortion in all circumstances unless that life is going to conflict with the life of the mother — we’re just trying to identify when it’s, when it’s appropriate to end the life of an unborn child,” she said.

    “The Legislature has set the bar high, and there’s nothing unconstitutional about their decision to do so,” she added.

    “What is your response to [Duane’s] argument that she, that these plaintiffs do not want to sue their doctor because they feel their doctor has done nothing wrong?” asked Justice Debra Lehrmann.

    “That is their choice,” Klusmann said. “They don’t have to actually obtain damages [from the doctors] if they don’t want to. But if they wish to gain clarity of law through perhaps a medical malpractice claim, that’s their choice.”

  98. says

    There are a lot of threats right now, and they are all directed at America’s powerless white conservative Christians. […] Now it turns out Taylor Swift is summoning the demons.

    Worse? She may not even know she’s doing it.

    JoeMyGod directs us to the extremist Catholic LifeSiteNews, which has a petition to ask Taylor Swift to please stop doing demon shit, even if only by accident. […]

    This is especially important considering how Swift’s concert film starts streaming on her birthday December 13, which could also be an important demon’s birthday, you don’t know.

    An exorcist priest — shut up, stop laughing — named Fr. Dan Reehil explained what is happening at the Taylor Swift concerts, and the Catholic website ChurchPop — shut up, stop laughing — is dutifully sharing his wisdom. It’s just one song in the concert, he says, the song called “Willow,” and, well:

    As Swift performs the song “Willow” from her “Evermore” album, the singer and her dancers dress in black capes and dance with orbs. Elements of Earth and fire are also a central part of the performance.

    Uh oh. The orbs.

    Diocese of Nashville exorcist Father Dan Reehil told ChurchPOP why the concert, which includes this performance, could spiritually endanger attendees.

    He also explains how the “Willow” performance mimics witchcraft with its use of Earth, fire, black capes, and orbs.

    Reehil says those who practice witchcraft “harness energy or they try to harness energy, and they look at the Earth with the elements of water, fire, Earth, and sky. They believe that they can harness this energy in some ways to do good and in some ways to do evil.”

    Wait, is Taylor Swift doing witchcraft? Is she an orb-handler? Doesn’t matter, says this serious person who is not crazy:

    “The problem with the concert is that whether Taylor knew she was trying to imitate witches or in fact was doing some kind of a cult ceremony during the show is sort of irrelevant to the demons,” Father Reehil continues.

    Irrelevant to the demons.

    “She is an incredibly talented and influential artist. And so the demons will take deep note of what she’s doing and how she’s doing it and who she’s influencing.”

    The demons have their notebooks open, they’re seeing how Taylor is doing the orbs, yep. Writing down who likes it.

    “So when they imitate these rituals with these orbs and these black capes, that looks like something you’d find in the woods.”

    And Taylor Swift also has a song called “Out Of The Woods,” and the video is kinda spooky too! Wonder if the demons have seen it. [video at the link]

    Back to Exorcist Dan:

    “Even if her intent was not to practice any witchcraft or do any of the incantations, she is probably attracting a lot of demons to her concerts.”

    Oh shit, that’s how they gitcha.

    “Look what you made me do,” sang along, didst the demons.

    Of course, they probably had to go through the ticket lottery and presale nightmares just like everybody else, so if they got seats they deserve them as much as anybody. Not sure what Exorcist Dan is so wee-wee-d up about here.

    Reminder, this is a grown man who believes what he is talking about is real.

    “That’s where the problem can lie because then you have these little girls who you know literally sort of worship her who are now putting themselves in a position where they could be attacked by demonic forces.”

    Through the orbs.

    “So not saying that’s going to happen to everybody, but you’re definitely putting yourself in a very dangerous situation if you’re going to a concert where there’s somebody who’s imitating or even practicing the art of witchcraft. I would say don’t do it. Skip the concert.”

    You might be fine. You might get attacked by demons.

    Don’t go to the thing you enjoy, little girls, says the stranger danger who says he’s from the Church and he’s here to help.

    These are such fucked up people.

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/please-sign-petition-to-tell-taylor

    Exorcist Dan needs to find something better to do with his time.

  99. says

    Forgot to add to comment 135 that the video of Exorcist Dan telling little girls not to go see Taylor Swift, because of the demons and the orbs, is also available at the link.

  100. says

    Twelve more hostages were released today.
    NBC News link

    The truce between Israel and Hamas entered a fifth day today after both sides agreed to extend the pause in fighting to allow for the release of more Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners. CIA Director Bill Burns is in Qatar for talks aimed at a further extension and a broader hostage deal.

    […] The U.S. says it has urged Israel that any offensive in southern Gaza after the truce must be designed to avoid “significant further displacement” of Palestinian civilians, who have been suffering for weeks in the south as supplies of food, water and medicine run low amid Israeli bombardment while the military campaign against Hamas was centered on the north. […]

  101. John Morales says

    Māori atheism on the rise: the legacy of colonisation is driving a decline in traditional Christian beliefs

    Um, these so-called “traditional Christian beliefs” only exist by virtue of colonisation, so that this headline is exceedingly and remarkably stupid.

    (And sly, too. It fosters the conceit that colonially-imposed religion is traditional to the Māori. For shame!)

  102. says

    Ukraine Update: Under cover of storm, Ukraine takes action at Avdiivka and Novoprokopivka

    Over the weekend, a major winter storm spread across Ukraine. Bad weather affected all regions of the country, destroying Russian defenses in occupied Crimea and causing 10 reported deaths in the Odesa area. The storm wasn’t quite as bad along the Zaporizhzhia front as it was further to the west, but all regions of Ukraine appear to have been affected, largely putting a stop to major military operations while both sides hunkered down against wind, snow, and plunging temperatures.

    However, not every operation went on hold. At this point in the invasion, Russia continues to rely heavily on the use of artillery. Even the older-generation tanks it brings to the front lines are often relegated to hanging back and acting as additional, less-effective guns. Unlike some of the systems available to Ukraine, almost all the Russian artillery is traditional “non-precision” weaponry. It has a variety of older guided shells that can be delivered to a target with the help of a laser spot, and it has the KAB-500S-E glide bombs based on GLONASS (Russia’s version of GPS). Identifying targets for those shells (and for the thousands of “dumb” shells Russia throws every day) is now largely the job of surveillance drones.

    Thanks to the storm, those surveillance drones were grounded. And Ukraine took that opportunity to claw back some ground.

    Weather reports along the southern front near Robotyne suggest that this could be the area where the storm had the least impact. Unsurprisingly, it’s also the area where the fighting remained most intense over the past two days as Ukraine pushed south toward Novoprokopivka. [map at the link]

    In addition to the areas recently secured on the east and west side of the Robotyne area, indications on Tuesday are that Ukraine has advanced into that angular area just above Novoprokopivka, in spite of heavy artillery use by Russia.

    Late in the day, Russia reportedly tried to press Ukraine back, but Ukraine appears to have held its gains. The General Staff reports just two failed attacks in the area by Russia, showing how much Ukraine is currently on the offensive in this region. Ukraine also made additional gains in the northeast part of this area in the direction of Novopokrovka (as opposed to Novoprokopivka … hey, I don’t name them). That is at the top-right corner of the map above. There are also reports that Ukraine picked up a small area along the right side of this map, about halfway between Novopokrovka and Verbove.

    For the moment, there are no additional reports of activity near Verbove, even though Ukraine has occupied defensive trenches just west of the town for weeks.

    The weather was actually worse at Avdiivka, where Russia has been attempting to cut off Ukrainian sources near the 2014 defensive lines for over two months. Those two months have seen Russia blow through an incredibly high number of troops, tanks, and armor in an effort to close a gap only 5 kilometers across. [map at the link]

    On Tuesday, Russia continued its push from the southeast. Having broken through Ukrainian defensive lines last week, Russia has been moving gradually through an industrial area on the edge of the city. Ukrainian forces have reportedly left this area, moving back into streets of homes and small businesses beyond a small wooded area. It’s likely Russia will occupy that whole industrial area by the end of the week.

    On Monday, Russian sources claimed that Russia had entered the industrial area on the north side of the city near the infamous Terrikon mountain of coal-mining waste. That does not seem to be the case.

    Instead, as Russia was claiming to have made advances in this area, it was Ukraine that was actually on the counterattack. Having previously pushed Russia back from Stepove on the north, Ukraine moved into the area near the rail lines on Monday and Tuesday, forcing Russia to retreat to the other side. This puts the number of Russian forces in this area back to where they were around Nov. 9.

    Reports last week showed Russia sending even more troops to the Avdiivka area. Deep State shows one Russian brigade camped out at the Terrikon, but the actual area in which they seem to be massing is a little to the north, around the area of that red circle on the map. There is cover in this area, both from old mine pits and from defensive trenches dug by Russia or Ukraine. Russia has even reportedly “tunneled” in this area, but there were similar claims about Russia tunneling into the waste of Terrikon, and that’s nonsense. This material is in no sense sound enough to maintain a tunnel.

    Russia may try to execute its next long-expected “big push” on both sides of the Terrikon in the next few days, weather permitting.

    None of the changes at the front lines during the storm period appear to have been very large, but pushing Russian forces back north of Avdiivka and costing them weeks of progress won through sacrificing thousands is certainly significant.

    It’s also interesting that, even though both sides are heavily dependent on drones, Ukraine was apparently better able to operate in the snow and cold than Russia. That factor could easily come into play again over the winter.
    ————————
    Clearly, this one came before the snow. Russia might be glad for the snow in Avdiivka, just so it will cover all the machines—and men—they’ve left on the field. [Tweet and video at the link]
    —————————
    Does anybody need a bike? Russia has apparently been delivering about 900 refugees a day from countries such as Morocco, Pakistan, and Syria to the Finnish border, but over the last week, Finland has been closing the gates. [Tweet and video at the link: “cemetery of bicycles at the border”] [See lumipuna’s comments 115 and 116]

    Finland is reportedly concerned that Russia is using legitimate migrants to disguise agents and influencers being moved across the border. Russia has also been reportedly bringing people to the border and forcing them across by closing the Russian border crossing behind them. Of course, real migrants are caught in the crossfire of this policy war, as are Russians trying to escape before the next round of conscription.
    ——————————–
    Foreign Policy is suggesting that the West move toward a “containment strategy” to help Ukraine survive what could be years of warfare.

    The war is not lost for Ukraine. Far from it. Enamored of Kyiv’s early successes and high morale, Ukraine’s supporters became accustomed to stunning Ukrainian triumphs. Yet this David-versus-Goliath framing of the war now generates too much pessimism when Ukrainian forces struggle or come to a deadlock with Russian troops. Even a stalemate, as frustrating as it seems, represents a huge accomplishment

    The goals of this plan are to secure everything Ukraine has gained, keep Russia off balance, and keep continuous pressure on Russian positions seeking weak points. Which, honestly, doesn’t seem like much of a change from what’s happening now.
    —————————–
    Built Ukraine Tough: “🇺🇦 UAV pilot spotted an enemy drone, which was adjusting the fire of artillery, and decided to ram it. As a result, our drone remained in the air, while the enemy “bird” fell.” [video at the link]

  103. Reginald Selkirk says

    Russian General Blown Up on a Landmine in Ukraine

    A Russian general has been killed in a mine blast in Ukraine, one of the highest-ranking military officers to be snuffed out in the war. Maj. Gen. Vladimir Zavadsky died Tuesday, according to an announcement from graduates of his alma mater, the Moscow Higher Combined Arms Command School.

    The deputy commander of the 14th Army Corps, Zavadsky was not killed in combat but is thought to have been killed by a landmine placed by a fellow Russian unit to target Ukrainian reconnaissance groups…

  104. says

    Trump tries to delay trial with another spurious court filing, but this one’s a stinker

    The latest news in the criminal case against coup-attempting seditionist Donald Trump—and this would be the federal case filed in Washington, D.C., charging Trump with attempting to obstruct the 2020 election we’re talking about, since Trump is under multiple indictments in multiple jurisdictions at this point—is another demand from Trump’s lawyers that the federal government turn over basically every scrap of info related to the insurrection, from multiple branches of the government, because reasons. We’ll go to The Washington Post for this one:

    In court papers filed Monday, Trump’s legal team sought permission to compel prosecutors to turn over reams of information on the 2020 election and Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack from the FBI, national security and election integrity units of the Justice Department, the Department of Homeland Security, the Capitol Police, the Defense Department, the D.C. police department, the National Guard, and members of Congress.

    There’s some surrounding hokum about how this is allegedly part of a Trump defense plan to show that the election was too stolen, or the violent insurrection he fomented was actually a false flag operation meant to make him look bad, and none of that matters even the slightest little bit. This is just another showboating delay tactic from Trump’s lawyers, almost certainly on Trump’s own orders, as he tries desperately to delay each of the trials against him until after the November 2024 elections and a possible election victory that would allow him to pardon himself for any federal convictions and simply ignore the charges in New York, Florida, and Georgia.

    The point of dumping this 370-page dead whale on U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s doorstep is that the judge now has to spend at least a little time cleaning it up, adding another delay to the trial. Trump probably won’t even get that, though; by making the requests so broad and open-ended, he’s made them easy for the judge to reject.

    Here is a tip: Prosecutors aren’t required to turn over information they don’t have. They’re also not obligated to do the defense team’s work for them.

    Federal criminal defendants typically can and often do file shotgun-blast requests for information in hopes of finding gaps in the prosecution’s case or at least slowing down the push toward trial. However, courts give U.S. prosecutors broad discretion to decide which evidence reasonably may be helpful to the defense and thus must be turned over. Their obligation to produce evidence is also limited to information available to the prosecution team — not everything known to the U.S. government at large.

    [LOL LOL LOL]

    […] Trump would have just as much luck demanding that special counsel Jack Smith’s team turn over Walmart sales records for Lincoln, Nebraska. If his lawyers want to see Walmart’s records, it’s on them to either go get them from Walmart or to convince the judge to issue a subpoena obliging Walmart to hand them over.

    The team of government officials prosecuting Trump are not Mar-a-Lago butlers, obliged to swoop in and clean Trump’s office windows, vacuum his rugs, and investigate all his latest conspiracy theories. They’re responsible for building a case and sharing with the defense whatever documents or testimony they’ve collected in order to build that case. They are not magic document fairies who can be sent off to fetch documents from every other nameable government department and agency—documents they don’t have, don’t know about, aren’t using, and which likely don’t even exist.

    There is the strong, strong stench of Donald Trump’s personal paranoias on this one. The biggest clue that Trump’s lawyers might just be sheepishly writing up whatever rambling new demands pop into Trump’s head is the inclusion of a wacky new conspiracy theory that suggests maybe Mike Pence is in on the plot to prosecute him. Maybe Pence was turned.

    Pence, Trump’s defense suggested, could have been motivated to align his story with prosecutors’ desires because of classified documents found at his home by his lawyer months after an FBI search of Trump’s residence and the discovery of classified documents at Biden’s home in Delaware and a separate think tank office. The Justice Department closed its investigation of Pence in June without charges.

    Oh dear God, shut the hell up with this nonsense. Trump thinks Mike Pence is now working with prosecutors because Pence also had classified documents turn up in his home but, like nearly every other prominent public official in recent history […]

    [Pence was not indicted!] That’s because, like all of those other non-indicted officials, Pence gave the documents back as soon as they were found! He didn’t hide hundreds of them next to a toilet or in a utility closet while sending his lawyers out to give signed statements promising he didn’t have them—absolutely no classified documents over here under the bathroom chandelier or by his bed or in his desk drawers. Donald Trump is such a dimwitted criminal […]

    Back to the matter at hand, though. Judge Chutkan already tossed a similar Trump team demand—one that would have subpoenaed members of the House in a supposed effort to find “missing” documents from the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 insurrection—and is not likely to spend as much time on this one as Trump might hope. It’s a desperate move from Trump, but this particular desperate move won’t result in the delay Trump has been trying for.

    Not that he’ll stop trying, of course. Give it a week, tops, and he’ll be back with something else.

  105. says

    Good news:

    ** 1) Generation Z is VOTING and voting BLUE

    Victor Shi @Victorshi2020

    Jaw-dropped at some of the Gen Z turnout rates from last night’s election compared to 2021.—Temple University: 523% HIGHER—Penn State: 300% HIGHER—College of William & Mary: 128% HIGHER
    Gen Z turned out & made Republicans find out. We will do it again in 2024. […]
    Note also that in the 2022 elections, about 63% of the Youth Voters in that election registered as Dems, which is an enormous shift in party identification.
    For example, compared to the 2020 election research from the Pew Research center, 49% of the voters “identify as/lean toward Democratic”, while 44% “identify as/lean toward Republican.”
    […]

    Major donors are sitting tight rather than giving to tRump.
    Although the Mercers are apparently going all in on TDFG, most others are not. His legal and physical/mental challenges are adding up to huge uncertainty on him as a candidate for the Presidency.

    […] The economy isn’t collapsing.
    We can debate whether the economy is strong and delivering for enough people, whether inflation is still high for key goods and services, or whether consumer confidence is misplaced. But what no one is talking about, but which was on the expectations list of nearly every economist and banker in 2022, is a recession.

    BTW, consumer spending during Black Friday ‘23 jumped 7.5% over the same time in 2022. So consumer confidence is higher than earlier expectations. That is very good news- if all or most of that increase continues thru the Christmas season!! […]

    Link

  106. Reginald Selkirk says

    Trump targets Judge Arthur Engoron’s wife on Truth Social

    Donald Trump is now taking aim at the wife of the New York judge overseeing his $250 million civil fraud trial, Raw Story reports. On his Truth Social platform Tuesday, the former president shared at least four posts from conservative activist Laura Loomer that accuse New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron’s wife, Dawn Marie Engoron, of attacking Trump via images shared to X/Twitter…

    In a statement to Newsweek earlier this month, Dawn Engoron firmly denied making the posts and told the outlet that the account does not belong to her. “I do not have a Twitter account. This is not me. I have not posted any anti Trump messages,” she said…

  107. says

    Donald Trump’s radical blueprint for a second term is multifaceted, but his interest in cracking down on the free press is a key piece of an ugly mosaic.

    There’s been increased interest of late in Donald Trump, his post-election vision, and the degree to which the former president’s plans echo authoritarianism. […]

    The blueprint is, by any fair measure, multifaceted. Trump has raised the prospect, for example, of seizing control of government departments and agencies that have historically operated with independence. There’s also been increased talk about the Insurrection Act and Trump’s interest in possibly deploying the U.S. military domestically.

    Unfortunately, the list keeps going. Members of Team Trump have a radical anti-immigration vision in mind for a second term. They’ve also hatched plans to hire right-wing lawyers who will be positioned to help Trump politicize federal law enforcement and exact revenge against his perceived political foes. The former president himself has also been quite candid about issuing pardons to politically allied criminals and labeling his opponents “vermin,” seemingly indifferent to the word’s 1930s-era antecedents.

    But let’s not forget that Trump’s plans for the free press are a key part of this ugly mosaic. Here, for example, was a missive the former president published to his social media platform shortly before midnight:

    “MSNBC (MSDNC) uses FREE government approved airwaves, and yet it is nothing but a 24 hour hit job on Donald J. Trump and the Republican Party for purposes of ELECTION INTERFERENCE. Brian Roberts, its Chairman and CEO, is a slimeball who has been able to get away with these constant attacks for years. It is the world’s biggest political contribution to the Radical Left Democrats who, by the way, are destroying our Country. Our so-called ‘government’ should come down hard on them and make them pay for their illegal political activity. Much more to come, watch!”

    Obviously, it’s a free country. If the former president doesn’t like my employer’s coverage, he’s welcome to criticize it to his heart’s content.

    But note that Trump didn’t just say he disapproves of MSNBC’s work. He also raised the prospect of the government coming down “hard” against the network, adding that he considers MSNBC’s journalism to be “illegal.”

    […] last month, Trump also publicly questioned CBS News’ right to access public airwaves after it ran an interview with President Joe Biden that Trump didn’t like.

    A month earlier, the former president also suggested that Comcast — MSNBC and NBC News’ parent company — should be investigated for “Country Threatening Treason” because he disapproved of the network’s coverage of the Trump/Russia scandal.

    There are counties where such talk and tactics have long been common. The United States just wasn’t one of them.

  108. says

    Summarized from a Huffington Post article:

    as the Republican National Committee moves forward with plans for its fourth presidential primary debate, Donald Trump last week demanded that the party scrap its plans. If Republican officials ignore his calls, the former president added, he will consider it time to “REVAMP THE RNC, NOW!!!”

  109. says

    Utah’s Mike Lee used to be a relatively mainstream GOP figure. Now he’s amplifying Infowars content and peddling bizarre Jan. 6 conspiracy theories.

    It was in late August when Republican Sen. Mike Lee went in a weird and new direction. Commenting on new Covid-related lockdowns that did not and will not exist, the Utah Republican decided to amplify unfounded allegations from conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ InfoWars website.

    Even by contemporary GOP standards, this was unsettling. Republicans have grown increasingly comfortable with strange ideas from the political fringe, but most of the party’s sitting U.S. senators recognize the value of steering clear of Alex Jones’ nonsensical misinformation. He is, after all, a media personality who owes nearly $1.5 billion in damages for spreading ugly lies about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

    Lee, however, apparently didn’t care.

    A couple of days after Lee amplified false Covid-related claims, Deputy White House Press Secretary Andrew Bates told Lee via social media, “Senator, this is completely false. Respectfully, we’d urge you to double-check before sharing misinformation from a source that now has to pay tens of millions of dollars for spreading some of the most painful lies imaginable.”

    That was good advice that the Utah Republican chose to ignore. A few months after promoting conspiratorial misinformation, Lee did it again last week. NBC News reported:

    A Republican senator said over the weekend that he planned to question the director of the FBI on whether a Trump supporter currently serving four years in federal prison is an undercover federal agent. Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, promoted on his personal X account a conspiracy theory that one of the Jan. 6 videos released at the order of House Speaker Mike Johnson shows an undercover federal agent disguised as a Trump supporter.

    [Lee] promoted a message showing a picture of a man on Capitol Hill that right-wing conspiracy theorists said was carrying an FBI badge. “I can’t wait to ask FBI Director Christopher Wray about this at our next oversight hearing,” Lee wrote.

    There is, however, nothing to ask about: We already know the identity of the man in the picture. It was Kevin Lyons, a Jan. 6 defendant who described himself as an “idiot,” and who was sentenced to 51 months in prison. What conspiracy theorists thought was an FBI badge was apparently a vaping device.

    In fringe circles, there are still people clinging to the idea that nefarious federal agents somehow participated in the assault on the Capitol, and the conspiracy theory that Lee helped promote was part of this ridiculous push.

    Indeed, in a follow-up online item, Lee showed a video of Jan. 6 violence and asked, “How many of these guys are feds?”

    A week later, the Utah Republican conceded to HuffPost that the man in the picture he promoted online probably wasn’t a federal agent disguised as a Donald Trump supporter. That said, Lee’s original online content still hasn’t been taken down, and the senator hasn’t made any effort to explain his support for fringe misinformation.

    There’s also a larger context to consider. The Bulwark’s Charlie Sykes reflected last week on Lee’s “strange, twisted journey.”

    By now it is a story as old as time. A once-respected, apparently normal Republican politician looks in the mirror one day and decides, to hell with it, I’m going all in on the insanity. Somewhere in the mists of the Before Times, Mike Lee was a simulacrum of a serious conservative. But there is no longer any incentive to try to sound like William F. Buckley Jr., so Lee has decided to follow ElonAlexJonesTuckerMTGTrump into the feculent bog of conspiracism. Actually, he dove in face-first.

    I’ll confess that every time this happens to a Republican official, I find it jarring. No one ever accused Lee of being a moderate GOP voice, but he presented himself as something of an intellectual. There was even some discussion in the not-too-distant past that the senator actually wanted to be considered for the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Lee held a safe seat in a reliably “red” state; he knew he’d probably never face a credible primary challenge; and he didn’t have any obvious incentives to go off the deep end.

    And yet, here the senator is, amplifying Infowars and peddling bizarre Jan. 6 conspiracy theories.

    It’s not too late for Lee to start working his way back to more sensible waters, but by all appearances, the Utahan has no interest in doing so.

  110. says

    Liz Cheney sheds new light on McCarthy’s infamous Mar-a-Lago trip

    In the aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy took some modest steps away from Donald Trump. Publicly, for example, he conceded that the former president “bears responsibility” for the riot.

    Privately, McCarthy told his members — in comments that were recorded and later released — that he’d “had it with this guy,” referring to Trump. The GOP leader added, “What he did is unacceptable. Nobody can defend that, and nobody should defend it.”

    That was in early January 2021. In late January 2021, just 17 days after the “had it with this guy” comments, McCarthy hopped on a plane, went to Mar-a-Lago, met with Trump, and kissed the proverbial ring of the disgraced former president he’d infuriated with a mild rebuke.

    In her new book, former House Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney sheds some additional light on the story with new behind-the-scenes details. CNN reported:

    Cheney also accuses McCarthy of repeatedly lying and choosing the “craven” path of embracing Trump. She recounts the moment she first found out that McCarthy, fearing he had lost his ability to fundraise, secretly went to visit Trump at Mar-a-Lago just three weeks after the Jan. 6 attack. At first, Cheney thought the photo of the two men smiling and shaking hands was fake. But she was incredulous at McCarthy’s defense of his visit. He claimed Trump’s staff summoned him.

    […] Cheney asked the future House speaker, “Mar-a-Lago? What the hell, Kevin?” McCarthy replied, referring to the former president’s aides, “They’re really worried. Trump’s not eating, so they asked me to come see him.”

    The Wyoming Republican was apparently incredulous. “What? You went to Mar-a-Lago because Trump’s not eating?” Cheney asked. “Yeah, he’s really depressed,” McCarthy said.

    […] The book, “Oath and Honor,” will be released next week, and Cheney apparently doesn’t pull her punches, taking aim at many of her former GOP colleagues as “enablers and collaborators.”

    [Cheney’s book is] reportedly filled with plenty of important insights related to House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and an exchange in which Republican Rep. Mark Green of Tennessee, in Cheney’s telling, referred to Trump as “the Orange Jesus.”

    With this in mind, let’s also note that Cheney will be sitting down with Rachel Maddow live on Monday’s show. I have a hunch you won’t want to miss that one.

  111. says

    No judge has had a better global view of the Trump prosecutions than U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who as chief judge in DC until earlier this year oversaw the grand juries investigating Trump’s election subversion efforts and his unlawful retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

    It was Howell who made key rulings during the Jan. 6 grand jury proceedings on executive privilege, the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege, and other investigative issues. As chief judge, she also had administrative responsibilities for the district court’s heavy case load of Jan. 6 rioter cases.

    So when Howell warns of creeping authoritarianism in the United States, it’s worth taking notice.

    Speaking last night at a lawyers event in DC, Howell quoted from Boston College historian Heather Cox Richardson’s new book, including:
    – “Big lies are springboards for authoritarians.”
    – The U.S. “is at a crossroads teetering on the brink of authoritarianism.”

    Howell’s comments were reported by Politico’s Josh Gerstein:

    “We are having a very surprising and downright troubling moment in this country when the very importance of facts is dismissed, or ignored,” Howell told the annual gala of the Women’s White Collar Defense Association at a downtown hotel. “That’s very risky business for all of us in our democracy. … The facts matter.”

    Howell did not mention Trump by name but noted that the DC judges “regularly see the impact of big lies at the sentencing of hundreds, hundreds of individuals who have been convicted for offense conduct on Jan. 6, 2021.”

    Link

  112. says

    Update on Senator Tommy Tuberville’s blanket hold on hundreds of top-level military promotions:

    […] Tuberville is stalling for time, trying to convince his fellow Republicans to hold off on a vote to override his holds for as long as he can manage it. He’s also claiming the Armed Service Committee colleagues are “getting close” to a solution. He hasn’t offered up any evidence for that claim either, only the broad assertion that he’s “trying to get some kind of resolution before we get home for Christmas.”

    But no, his colleagues don’t appear to see whatever “resolution” Tuberville claims might be forthcoming. They keep proposing compromises, Tuberville keeps insisting that the holds will continue until the military’s abortion policies are rescinded, and top military officials keep warning that our armed forces cannot remain effective with hundreds of command positions left in limbo.

    This has been going on for 10 months now, with Tuberville insisting that a solution is just around the corner for at least the last two months. Tuberville’s main problem at this point may be that even his fellow Republicans know full well that he’s lying to them. […]

    An impasse that came about because a performatively ignorant racist who got his official Senate picture taken with a damn football believes he, and not administration and the Pentagon, is the one who gets to set military health care policies to what he wants them to be.

    Link

  113. says

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/infowars-reports-gods-mood-lighting

    Most news coverage of yesterday’s memorial service for Rosalynn Carter simply noted that the service was attended by Joe and Jill Biden, along with all four living former first ladies — Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush, Michelle Biden, and Melania Trump — and left it at that. A few snarkier sites like Page Six and New York Magazine’s Intelligencer pointed out that, unlike the other first ladies who dressed in black because that’s traditional for a funeral, Ms. Trump chose a grey tweed coat instead. They reported it as a fashion don’t, while at least being relieved that Melania Antoinette left her “I REALLY DON’T CARE DO U?” coat at home.

    Chip Carter, Jimmy and Rosalynn’s son, told the Washington Post that regardless of the many mean things Donald Trump has said about his father, it went without saying that Melania Trump would be invited, because “My mother was a gracious person and she would treat everybody with respect, including a former first lady.”

    And then there’s Alex Jones’s InfoWars, whose coverage pointed out that only Satanists wear black to a funeral, whereas Melania was singled out for attention by God, who arranged for some light from the windows at Glenn Memorial United Methodist Church in Atlanta to fall on her, and her alone, with some slippage, during one part of the service. We have not altered a single bit of this screenshot: [Screenshot is available at the link]

    Under the subject heading “Occult & Globalists,” the headline proclaims, “Melania Trump Cast in Angelic Light at Rosalynn Carter Funeral as ‘Evil’ First Ladies Wear Black, Lurk in Shadows.” (“Evil,” is a quote from one of the many tweets in the story, not necessarily the judgement of InfoWars, wink-wink.) Just to make sure readers get the point, the story’s subhead quotes another tweet that said “Take notice how Melania is clothed in the light of God, while the others sit in the dark world they live in with Satan.” [OMFG]

    So that’s some serious journalism […]

    The story also made sure to mention the wingnut conspiracy theory that Michelle Obama is actually a dude, but we wonder if some of the faithful will take issue with InfoWars’ admission that Donald Trump is a former president:

    The wife of embattled former President Donald Trump appeared alongside Michelle “Big Mike” Obama, Laura Bush, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Joe and Jill Biden, but received a chilly reception from leftists and mainstream publications who complained she wore light attire, while others wore black.

    The story highlighted tweets accusing Michelle Obama and Laura Bush of “glaring” at Ms. Trump, and featured another that, ha-ha, suggested Bill Clinton couldn’t stop staring at her ass, because with MS-Paint, everything is possible. (Seriously, Clinton was looking more or less straight ahead.) [image at the link]

    Then it was time to gripe at tweets from “leftists” and to promote tweets from decent patriotic Americans who recognize Melania’s near-divinity. [Example at the link]

    Here’s another, which may be spoiled some by the fact that a little of God’s Light is also shining on Michelle Obama and Laura Bush, those demons […] [Image at the link]

    A few smartasses figured the guy who’s also randomly lit up five rows behind Melania must also be a favorite of the Almighty, or MAYBE he was Melania’s guardian angel, his cover blown by a TV camera.

    In conclusion, we sure are glad that Trumpers are sane normal people who accept reality as it is, and also my solar-powered cat Thornton is clearly God’s Favorite Kitty, the end. [cat photo at the link]

  114. says

    PHOENIX – Attorney General Kris Mayes today announced that the State Grand Jury has returned an indictment charging Peggy Suzanne Judd, age 61, of Willcox, and Terry Thomas “Tom” Crosby, age 64, of Sierra Vista with the felony offenses of Interference with an Election Officer and Conspiracy.

    “The repeated attempts to undermine our democracy are unacceptable,” said Attorney General Mayes. “I took an oath to uphold the rule of law, and my office will continue to enforce Arizona’s elections laws and support our election officials as they carry out the duties and responsibilities of their offices.”

    The indictment filed November 27, 2023, in Maricopa County Superior Court alleges that on or between October 11, 2022, and December 1, 2022, Judd and Crosby conspired to delay the canvass of votes cast in Cochise County in the November 2022 General Election.

    The Indictment further alleges that Judd and Crosby knowingly interfered with the Arizona Secretary of State’s ability to complete the statewide canvass for the 2022 General Election, by preventing the canvass of votes from Cochise County from occurring during the time period required by Arizona law. Defendants Judd and Crosby are currently serving as Cochise County Supervisors. […]

    Link

  115. says

    Deutsche Bank comes off as gullible in this story:

    Deutsche Bank eagerly pursued former President Trump as a “whale” of a client more than a decade ago, and over the years, their partnership became mutually beneficial, according to documents introduced by Trump’s legal team Wednesday during his ongoing fraud trial.

    Trump’s counsel on Wednesday introduced 2011 emails between then-bank managing director Rosemary Vrablic and colleagues, where Vrablic expressed significant interest in working with the Trumps.

    “We are whale hunting,” she wrote after meeting Donald Trump Jr., before she had met his father. The bankers used “whale” to refer to very wealthy clients, she testified Wednesday.

    Trump’s relationship with Deutsche Bank is a core component of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit against the former president, his business and several executives — including his adult sons. The state claims the Trump Organization falsely inflated and deflated the value of its assets on key financial statements to receive lower taxes and better insurance coverage, deceiving lenders and insurers in the process.

    As part of its defense, Trump’s counsel has attempted to show that bankers were excited to work with the former president’s business and that there was “no victim” of its business dealings. According to a bank document prepared for Deutsche Bank’s then-co-chairman in 2013, shown as evidence at trial, the bank’s revenue from its business with Trump skyrocketed from around $13,000 in 2011 to a projected $6 million in 2013.

    Trump testified earlier this month that his statements of financial condition — documents at the heart of the case that detail the value of his business’ various assets and were used to secure loans and deals — were “not really documents that the banks paid much attention to.”

    “I’ve been dealing with banks for 50 years and probably know banks as well as anybody,” Trump said on the witness stand earlier this month. “I know what they look at; they look at the deal.”

    But the attorney general’s office claims that the government was nonetheless misled and banks were shortchanged millions of dollars. Earlier in the trial, an expert witness hired by the state testified that the Trump Organization’s skewed financial statements may have cost banks more than $168 million in interest.

    Judge Arthur Engoron has already found Trump and his business liable for fraud. The trial is addressing other claims, including conspiracy, insurance fraud and falsifying business records.

    Four Deutsche Bank executives are expected to testify this week in the defense case, which is set to span until mid-December when Trump plans to retake the stand as the defense’s last witness.

    Link

  116. says

    U.S. prosecutors allege assassination plot of Sikh separatist directed by Indian government employee

    Washington Post link

    An Indian government employee who described himself as a “senior field officer” responsible for intelligence ordered the assassination of a Sikh separatist in New York City in May, U.S. prosecutors alleged Wednesday. The court filing heightens scrutiny of India’s spy services following similar allegations made by Canadian authorities in September.

    The government employee, who was not named in the indictment filed in a federal court in Manhattan, recruited an Indian national named Nikhil Gupta to hire a hit man to carry out the assassination, which was foiled by U.S. authorities, according to prosecutors.

    The court filing did not name the victim, but senior Biden administration officials say the target was Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, general counsel for the New York-based Sikhs for Justice, a group that advocates the creation of an independent Sikh state called Khalistan within India.

    The scheme was foiled in June by the Drug Enforcement Administration, according to people familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.

    Gupta is charged with murder-for-hire and conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire. He was arrested in the Czech Republic in late June pending extradition to the United States.

    The alleged link between the Indian government and the assassination attempt on U.S. soil threatens to strain ties between the two countries and prompted the Biden administration to dispatch its top two intelligence officials to New Delhi to demand the Indian government investigate and hold to account those responsible, senior administration officials said.

    CIA Director William J. Burns flew to India in August and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines followed in October, said the officials, who like others interviewed for this story spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity. […]

  117. says

    Israel-Hamas war live updates: Israel assessing Hamas claim that 10-month-old hostage was killed in Gaza

    Negotiations are ongoing to extend the truce, which is due to expire tonight.

    The truce between Israel and Hamas is due to end today, but talks are ongoing to extend the pause in fighting to allow for the release of more Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners. The expectation is for an extension of at least two additional days, a senior Arab diplomat directly involved in the negotiations told NBC News.

    Israel’s military said today it is looking into Hamas’ claim that the youngest hostage held in Gaza, 10-month old Kfir, has been killed, along with his 4-year-old brother, Ariel, and their mother Shiri Bibas. Hamas had said the three hostages, some of the most prominent faces of the crisis, had been killed in Israeli bombardment.

    Israeli forces carried out a raid on the Jenin refugee camp in the occupied West Bank and said they had killed two senior militants. Graphic video shared on social media this morning showed a group of boys being shot at in a side street in Jenin. The Palestinian Health Ministry said two children were killed in the area today, including an 8-year-old boy.

    The U.S. says it has urged Israel against any military assault on southern Gaza unless it has a clear plan to limit civilian suffering. But President Joe Biden is sticking to his belief that despite intense pressure to change course, a close embrace of Israel gives him greater influence with its leaders and public.

    More than 1.7 million people have been displaced in Gaza, where health officials say the death toll has surpassed 14,500 after weeks of Israeli attacks. The Israel Defense Forces estimates 1,200 people were killed in the Oct. 7 Hamas attack, with around 160 people still held captive in Gaza. […]

  118. says

    The federal government is investigating multiple hacks suspected to have been launched by an Iranian government-linked cyber group against U.S. water facilities that were using Israeli-made technology, according to two individuals familiar with the probes.

    One of the breaches made headlines Saturday after the Tehran-linked Cyber Av3ngers group claimed responsibility for hitting a water authority in Pennsylvania. In total, the government is aware of and examining a “single digit” number of facilities that have been affected across the country, according to the two people who were granted anonymity to discuss details that had not yet been made public.

    None of the hacks caused significant disruption, according to the individuals, while cyber experts familiar with the Pennsylvania incident say the activity appears designed to stoke fears about using Israeli devices.

    Washington has been bracing for increased cyber breaches from Iran since the latest conflict broke out between Israel and the militant group Hamas, which Tehran has long supported. It also comes amid a spate of recent drone and rocket attacks on American troops in the Middle East, conducted by Iranian proxy groups.

    Water facilities in general are a particularly vulnerable part of U.S. infrastructure, often due to a lack of funding and personnel for the issue at smaller utilities. The Biden administration has sought to address this problem, including through expanding partnerships with private organizations involved in the water sector.

    In Saturday’s hack on the Municipal Water Authority of Aliquippa outside of Pittsburgh, authorities say Cyber Av3ngers, which researchers believe has ties to the Iranian government, breached a digital control panel made by an Israeli-owned company, Unitronics, and disabled it. The group also took over the control panel’s digital display screen — which is used to automatically adjust water pressure — to make it read: “Every equipment ‘Made in Israel’ is Cyber Av3ngers legal target.”

    Robert Bible, the general manager of the water authority, told POLITICO on Monday that control over the Unitronics devices would not give attackers the ability to alter the chemicals used in drinking water, and that the authority has not suffered any service disruptions at the affected station, which serves 1,200 people. […]

    The utility is operating the water pumps at the affected station manually while the authorities investigate the incident […]

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/28/federal-government-investigating-multiple-hacks-of-us-water-utilities-00128977

  119. says

    Biden admin circulates map showing states that benefit from Ukraine aid

    Battleground states Pennsylvania and Arizona are reaping billions of dollars from Washington’s efforts to arm Ukraine, according to a graphic the Biden administration has circulated on Capitol Hill.

    The circulation of the graphic is part of the administration’s push to sell the American public — and their congressional representatives — on President Joe Biden’s proposal to spend billions of additional taxpayer dollars on the wars in Ukraine and Israel.

    During an Oval Office address last month, Biden highlighted the benefit to U.S. manufacturing centers when making the case that Republicans should support the $60 billion for Ukraine contained in the $106 billion emergency supplemental. A faction of GOP members has fought further funding, arguing that the U.S. is spending money to help Ukraine rather than focusing on problems at home.

    “Let me be clear about something,” Biden said. “We send Ukraine equipment sitting in our stockpiles. And when we use the money allocated by Congress, we use it to replenish our own stores, our own stockpiles with new equipment.”

    “Equipment that defends America and is made in America. Patriot missiles for air defense batteries, made in Arizona. Artillery shells manufactured in 12 states across the country, in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas. And so much more,” he said. “You know, just as in World War II, today patriotic American workers are building the arsenal of democracy and serving the cause of freedom.” […]

    Economic Impact map is available at the link.

  120. Reginald Selkirk says

    ‘Perfect solar system’ found in search for alien life

    Researchers have located “the perfect solar system”, forged without the violent collisions that made our own a hotchpotch of different-sized planets.

    The system, 100 light years away, has six planets, all about the same size. They’ve barely changed since its formation up to 12 billion years ago…

    In the time it takes for the innermost planet to go around the star three times, the next planet along gets around twice, and so on out to the fourth planet in the system. From there things change to a 4:3 pattern of relative orbit speeds for the last two planets…

  121. says

    Followup to comment 156.

    The more there are incidents in which officials balk at certifying elections, the more we’re reminded about the consequences of the post-2020 “big lie.”

    The primary elections in New Mexico in June 2022 were largely unremarkable. Candidates ran, voters participated, ballots were counted, and election results were announced. It couldn’t have been more routine — except for one thing.

    As regular readers might recall, in New Mexico’s Otero County, some Republican commissioners balked at certifying the results of local primary races. These GOP officials didn’t have any specific reasons to reject the results, but they had some conspiracy theories related to voting machines, so they refused to do their jobs based on their baseless hunches.

    Eventually, New Mexico’s secretary of state filed suit, and the state Supreme Court issued an order that the Republicans agreed to follow. But the fact that these extra steps were necessary was unsettling. An Associated Press report described the mess in New Mexico at the time as “a preview of the kind of chaos election experts fear is coming in the fall midterms and in 2024.”

    The article quoted Jennifer Morrell, a former election official in Colorado and Utah who now advises federal, state, and local officials, saying, “We are in scary territory. If this can happen here, where next? It’s like a cancer, a virus. It’s metastasizing and growing.”

    That quote came to mind reading this NBC News report out of Arizona on Wednesday:

    A grand jury voted to indict two local officials who delayed the certification of midterm election results in 2022 in Cochise County, Arizona, state Attorney General Kris Mayes said Wednesday. Cochise County Supervisors Peggy Judd, 61, and Tom Crosby, 64, voted against certifying the county’s election results by the statutory deadline in 2022, after months of casting baseless doubt on the integrity of the election.

    A report in The Arizona Republic added that the local GOP officials, in the wake of last fall’s elections, forced a delay in the certification process, saying they wanted to consider questions about voting machines. “By that time,” the article noted, “they had ignored repeated legal advice that their actions were illegal.”

    As was the case in New Mexico several months earlier, litigation was filed, culminating in a court order in which supervisors in Cochise County were ordered to certify the results. Officials honored the court directive, though one of the two indicted Republicans didn’t show up for the vote.

    One of the pair also attended Donald Trump’s anti-election rally on Jan. 6, 2021, but she denied entering the Capitol.

    “The repeated attempts to undermine our democracy are unacceptable,” the local prosecutor said in a written statement after a grand jury indicted the two GOP officials. “I took an oath to uphold the rule of law, and my office will continue to enforce Arizona’s elections laws and support our election officials as they carry out the duties and responsibilities of their offices.”

    At first blush, this might seem like a random local legal dispute, but I keep thinking about the aforementioned quote from the former election official in Colorado and Utah: “It’s metastasizing and growing.”

    The more incidents like these pop up, the more we’re reminded about the lingering consequences of the post-2020 “big lie.”

  122. Reginald Selkirk says

    Elon Musk To Advertisers: “Go F–k Yourself”

    Elon Musk made plain his view of an advertiser withdrawal from X, formerly Twitter.

    “Don’t advertise,” he advised any marketer with misgivings. “Somebody’s going to try to blackmail me with advertising?! Blackmail me with money? Go f–k yourself. Go. F–k. Yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.” …

    Sorkin repeatedly asked Musk how the economic model of X/Twitter would be affected by a longer-term advertiser withdrawal.

    “What this advertising boycott is going to do is it’s going to kill the company,” he said. “And the whole world will know that those advertisers killed the company. It will be documented in great detail.” …

    “Once in a while I will say something foolish,” he said. “I would certainly put that ‘You’ve said the actual truth’ [post] as one of the most foolish things, or the most foolish thing, I ever put on the platform” – maybe “one of the dumbest of my 30,000 posts.”

    He tried to explain what he did mean, that Jewish people have been persecuted for thousands of years and there is a natural affinity among a persecuted group. “You have seen protests for Hamas in every major city and they receive funding from prominent people in the Jewish community,” he said. “If you fund persecuted groups in general, some of those persecuted groups unfortunately want your annihilation. What I meant is that its unwise to fund organizations that support groups that want your annihilation.” …

    In which pro-Palestinian protests are considered “protests for Hamas” – does this stable genium ever get tired of being wrong?

  123. tomh says

    NPR:
    Supreme Court conservatives seem likely to axe SEC enforcement powers
    Nina Totenberg / NOVEMBER 29, 2023

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative justices seemed highly skeptical Wednesday about the way the Securities and Exchange Commission conducts in-house enforcement proceedings to ensure the integrity of securities markets across the country. The case is one of several this term aimed at dismantling what some conservatives have derisively called, “the administrative state.”

    Wednesday’s case was brought by George Jarkesy, a former conservative radio talk show host and hedge fund manager. After a fraud investigation by the SEC and an in-house evidentiary hearing conducted by an administrative law judge, the SEC fined Jarkesy $300,000, ordered him to pay back nearly $700,000 in illicit gains and barred him from various activities in the securities industry.

    He challenged the SEC actions in court, contending that he was entitled to a trial in federal court before a jury of his peers, and that Congress didn’t have the power to delegate such enforcement powers to an agency. Supporting his challenge is a virtual who’s-who of conservative and business groups — plus some individuals like Elon Musk, who has repeatedly resisted the SEC’s attempts to investigate stock manipulation charges in his companies.

    Although Wednesday’s case involved several different constitutional challenges to the SEC’s enforcement actions, the justices focused almost exclusively on one: the contention that the agency’s in-house fact finding process violated Jarkesy’s Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. All six of the conservative justices questioned the notion that an administrative agency can impose penalties without offering the option of a jury trial.

    “It seems to me that undermines the whole point of the constitutional protection in the first place,” Chief Justice John Roberts said.

    Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher repeatedly replied that Congress has, for some 80 years, delegated these core executive enforcement powers to agencies that are charged with applying the law and imposing consequences for violations. If the SEC’s administrative enforcement powers are unconstitutional, he said, so too might be similar enforcement powers at some 34 federal agencies, from the Food and Drug Administration to the National Transportation Safety Board and the Social Security Administration, which issues a whopping half million hearing and appeals dispositions each year.

    “The assessment and collection of taxes and penalties, customs and penalties, the immigration laws, the detention and removal of non-citizens — all of those things … have long been done in the first instance by administrative officers,” Fletcher said.

    Making the counterargument, Michael McColloch — Jarkesy’s lawyer –contended that only those functions that are analogous to laws at the time of the founding in 1791 are presumed to be legitimate.

    “The dramatic change that you’re proposing in our approach and jurisdiction is going to have consequences across the board,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor observed…

    Justice Elena Kagan added that in recent decades there have been no challenges to these administrative enforcement functions because these powers have been considered “settled.”…

    Kagan noted that there have been three major tranches of securities legislation to strengthen securities enforcement: First during the Great Depression in the 1930s when the agency was founded, then after the Savings and Loan Crisis in the 1980s and then after the 2008 Great Recession when huge investment banks failed, sending the economy spiraling downward and forcing a federal bailout to prevent even more bank failures.

    Each time, observed Kagan, “Congress thought … something is going terribly wrong here … people are being harmed.” And “Congress said ‘we have to give the SEC … greater authorities.’ ”

    “I mean, is Congress’ judgment … entitled to no respect?” Kagan asked.

    The conservative court’s answer to that question may well be, “No.”

  124. Reginald Selkirk says

    Trump Caught Moving Money Around to Pay Massive Tax Bill

    A court-ordered financial auditor has caught Donald Trump quietly moving $40 million from the Trump Organization into a personal bank account—seemingly so the former president could pay his whopping $29 million tax bill.

    Trump isn’t supposed to be moving any money around without alerting Barbara S. Jones, a former federal judge in New York tasked with babysitting the Trump Organization for its relentlessly shady business practices. But on Wednesday, she notified a New York state court about some major bank transfers that were never brought to her attention by the Trumps…

    Barbara Jones? The same Barbara Jones mentioned here?
    Fraud-trial judge saves Trump from what could have been a shoot-self-in-foot plan to call Trump Org’s court-ordered watchdog as a defense witness

    Donald Trump’s lawyers tried to squeeze an unlikely new name onto their already crowded witness list in the New York civil fraud trial on Monday: Barbara Jones, the Trump Organization’s highly critical court-appointed monitor.

    The judge in the non-jury trial, state Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, turned down the defense request, saving Trump’s side from itself in the process…

  125. Reginald Selkirk says

    Governor Katie Hobbs signs petition for 2024 abortion ballot measure in Arizona

    Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs was joined by other political leaders on the morning of Nov. 28 to try and get an abortion measure on the ballot in November 2024.

    According to an Associated Press article published in early November, abortion access advocates in Arizona want to amend the state’s constitution in order to protect access to abortion until the fetus is viable, generally considered to be around 24 weeks gestational age or later, to protect the life or physical or mental health of the woman…

  126. says

    Laughable:

    House Speaker Mike Johnson pretended Wednesday that Republicans have any basis at all for moving forward on impeaching President Joe Biden, and that this is a serious inquiry. Johnson soberly intoned that the Republicans understand “impeachment requires time … You don’t rush something like this.”

    Meanwhile, House Republican leadership told members that they’ll be taking a formal vote on impeachment in the next few weeks, possibly in January. That’s even while their plans for a hearing with their primary witness, Hunter Biden, are crumbling around them. Johnson laughably praised the committee chairs for conducting their circus “methodically and transparently,” when right now they’re trying to force Hunter Biden’s testimony to happen behind closed doors.

    Johnson really gave the game away, though, in a statement that could have come straight from “1984”’s Ministry of Truth. He claimed that both of Donald Trump’s impeachments—in which he was on the Trump defense team—were “brazenly political” and “meritless.” The GOP’s efforts to impeach President Joe Biden, however, are “just the opposite” because “the Republican Party stands for the rule of law.”

    That’s the whole game, right there. It’s not about the rule of law. It’s about revenge for Trump. Period.

    Link

  127. says

    Ukraine Update: Assisting Ukraine is the best U.S. defense program in decades, by Mark Sumner

    The list of reasons why assisting Ukraine is good for the United States is a long one. There’s the immense damage to the Russian military, the revitalization and expansion of NATO, the restoration of America’s position as a leader in the fight for democracy, the strengthening of diplomatic ties, and even a giant shift away from Russian-supplied oil and gas.

    Also, defending a peaceful democratic nation against an illegal invasion by an aggressive, authoritarian military force is simply the right thing to do. And doing the right thing now and then is good for everyone.

    But there’s another way in which helping Ukraine is helping the United States: It is revitalizing the American defense industry, generating innovation, and creating jobs in America.

    An evaluation from the Center for Strategic and International Studies shows what should have been obvious from the start: When we talk about assistance to Ukraine, most of it involves the transfer of existing weapons systems that have already been built. Many of those systems are older, like the 1,669 Humvees and 300 M113 armored personnel carriers the American military has shipped to Ukraine.

    But when shipments to Ukraine involve either systems or ammunition that need to be replaced, or new systems that are seeing their first use in combat, that generates orders to defense contractors. And those defense contractors aren’t in Ukraine: They’re in the U.S.

    In fact, The Washington Post reports that of the $68 billion in military assistance Congress has approved following Russia’s invasion, almost 90% has gone to Americans. The locations where these systems are being built are scattered across the nation. [Tweet and map at the link]

    Bradley fighting vehicles are built in Pennsylvania and Alabama. HIMARS rocket launchers come from Arkansas. Switchblade drones come from California.

    Both Abrams tanks and Stryker combat vehicles roll off United Auto Worker lines in Ohio. This means that Republicans like Sen. J.D. Vance and Rep. Jim Jordan aren’t just voting against democracy when they try to block assistance to Ukraine, they are actively voting against jobs in their own home state and district.

    I’m a big believer in many of the things President Dwight Eisenhower had to say in his farewell address. No one should cheer the spending of a single penny on military hardware that might otherwise be spent on infrastructure, health care, or any peaceful purpose. And guarding against the influence of what Eisenhower called the “military-industrial complex” is at least as important today as it was in 1961.

    But Eisenhower understood that, in an age where war could reach around the world in minutes, the risks of a robust defense industry had to be weighed against the cost of being unable to respond when necessary. It wasn’t a situation that he wanted. It shouldn’t be a situation that anyone wants. But if the United States is going to spend money on acquiring weapons so that Ukraine can fight against the invading might of Russia, it’s a very good thing that the money is being spent in the United States.

    So far, Ukraine’s use of those weapons systems looks like a bargain, by anyone’s accounting. Over the last 643 days, Russia’s efforts to illegally invade and subjugate Ukraine have been a disaster for Vladimir Putin and his dreams of a renewed Soviet empire. Ukraine now estimates that Russia has lost 5,538 tanks in the conflict, over 2,500 of which have been independently visually confirmed. Add to that over 10,000 armored vehicles, over 8,000 artillery and MLRS systems, more than 300 military helicopters, and over 300 jet aircraft. All that’s on top of losing a sizable fraction of the Black Sea Fleet, the rest of which is now cowering in ports they hope are outside of Ukraine’s reach.

    Russia has also lost at least 20 generals, thousands of lower-ranking officers, and an estimated 300,000 soldiers. Putin can call up all the conscripts he wants, scour the weeds for rusting tanks, and turn up the dial on his nation’s miserable industrial capacity, but Russia will spend decades recovering from the losses it has suffered in Ukraine. It may never recover.

    Of course, the cost to Ukraine is measured in far more than dollars. They’ve also suffered tremendous losses and seen whole cities leveled by Putin’s insatiable appetite for destruction.

    One of these days, money to assist Ukraine is going to be spent in Ukraine. Because that money won’t be for weapons: It will go to rebuilding homes, restoring vital services, and replacing lost schools and hospitals.

    Let’s get to that day as fast as we can.
    ——————————————–

    For much of last year, the small village of Khromove was frequently mentioned because of its vital tactical position at the end of a road that started at Bakhmut and ran to Chasiv Yar. That “Kromove road” was at times known as the “road of life,” because it represented the last completely paved road allowing supplies and reinforcements to reach Bakhmut. At other times, it was the “road of death” because Russian forces had reached the heights about 4 kilometers to the north and began to rain artillery down on any vehicle that attempted the route.

    You can see the change in positions in these two maps from Deep State. First, here’s where things stood on Monday.

    Since Bakhmut fell, Khromove—which was little more than a couple of buildings and a crossroads, even before Russia bombed holy hell out of it—has been largely out of the news. But that changed Tuesday evening when Russia claimed to have surged west out of Bakhmut and captured the village. [map at the link]

    And here’s how they looked by end of day on Tuesday. [map at the link]

    To make the difference more clear, I’ve dropped a circle around the area of the Russian advance. The peak distance here is just over 1 kilometer, so it’s not a huge change. However, Russia is moving into an area where it had been unable to advance since Wagner Group forces left Bakhmut. This could mean that Ukraine has redeployed forces out of this area to bolster efforts at Avdiivka or elsewhere, leaving this area more open to Russian movement. However, that’s just speculation.

    According to Deep State, which is generally conservative in all of its claims, Ukraine still controls that crossroads at Khromove, with Russia only holding positions at the northeast end of the village. However, Russia says it took it all. The Ukrainian General Staff also doesn’t include Khromove among the locations hit by Russian artillery on Wednesday but does list Ivaniske, which is the next town over. That could be an indicator that Russia either has the location or has essential control of the area.
    ————————————–

    It is reported that last night, Ukraine attacked Saki air base in occupied Crimea, specifically the 43rd Aviation Regiment. Preliminary reports suggest over 30 Russian servicemen were killed.

    [Video at the link]

  128. says

    President Joseph Biden is in Pueblo, Colorado, today — Lauren Boebert’s district — to talk about “how Bidenomics is mobilizing investments in clean energy manufacturing and creating good-paying jobs in communities across the country,” per the White House.

    This is what is known as rubbing their nose in it.

    He’s going to the biggest wind turbine tower manufacturing plant in the world, so this will likely hurt Donald Trump’s feelings too, because he hates windmills.

    “We want every American to know that Bidenomics is working for them — creating jobs and opportunities, especially in communities that have been left behind,” a White House official told Playbook last night. “And it’s important for Americans to know that if Republicans in Congress — including self-identified MAGA Republican Representative Lauren Boebert — want to undermine their communities by taking those investments and opportunities away.”

    Lauren Boebert is not invited. […]

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/live-biden-does-bidenomics-to-lauren

  129. says

    Followup to Akira @168.

    American diplomat Henry Kissinger dies at 100

    […] Known for a sprawling career in national security and foreign policy, Kissinger served as national security adviser from 1969 to 1975 under President Nixon. While serving as security adviser, Nixon appointed him as the 56th Sectary of State, becoming the first person to ever serve as both secretary of state and national security adviser.

    He remained secretary of state under former President Ford, who then removed him from his role as national security adviser.

    Kissinger, born in 1923 as Heinz Alfred Kissinger, spent the beginning of his life in Germany before his family, who is Jewish, immigrated to the U.S. after the Nazis seized power. Once in the U.S., Kissinger changed his name to Henry. […]

    […] But he was also one of the most singularly reviled public figures of his age.

    […] Kissinger drew international condemnation and accusations of war crimes for his key role in widening the American presence in Vietnam and the U.S. bombing of Cambodia, died Wednesday.

    He was 100. […]

    [His] legacy is inextricably bound up with bloodshed around the world. In the eyes of his critics, he was synonymous with the brutality of American power and some of the costliest foreign policy decisions in modern history.

    Kissinger’s detractors denounced him for the central role he played in expanding U.S. military involvement in Vietnam, bringing a wide-scale bombing campaign to Cambodia and supporting brutal regimes in Argentina, Chile, Indonesia and Pakistan. His most vociferous opponents labeled him a war criminal, and some called on him to face charges at the Hague.

    In academia and politics, Kissinger strove to “project the myth of being a no-nonsense, half-European realpolitiker capable of explaining to naive America how to behave on the international stage,” according to Mario Del Pero, who wrote the 2009 book “The Eccentric Realist: Henry Kissinger and the Shaping of American Foreign Policy.”

    Kissinger’s worldview revolved around “great power competition” — the idea that decisions made by the U.S., its allies and rivals are generally motivated by their national interests, rather than concerns about others or even accepted moral norms.

    This “dark narrative” gains traction “in the U.S. during times of great crisis and difficulty” such as the 1970s and today — rather than during the post-Cold War Western optimism of the 1990s, said Del Pero, who is an international history professor at SciencesPo, a university in Paris. […]

    Cambodia is not the only nation where Kissinger’s legacy is one of violence and chaos. He is accused of supporting Pakistan’s military regime during the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971, and backing the Indonesian invasion of East Timor in 1975. Better known perhaps is his role in helping Chilean military dictator Augusto Pinochet overthrow the country’s democratically elected President Salvador Allende in 1973. […]

    Kissinger was accused of glossing over the facts when writing his memoirs to enhance his own reputation and role in history. For example, in reflecting on his first visit to China in 1971, he wrote that Taiwan “was only mentioned briefly,” when in fact records released decades later showed that he had offered dramatic concessions over the contentious island in the hope of earning China’s support over Vietnam. […]

    In interviews around his 100th birthday in May, he said that many world leaders — including Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin — would likely answer his call were he to telephone them unscheduled. […]

  130. says

    New York Times:

    The Supreme Court’s conservative majority seemed receptive on Wednesday to an attack on one of the primary ways the Securities and Exchange Commission enforces laws against securities fraud.

  131. says

    New York Times:

    The United Automobile Workers union announced Wednesday that it was undertaking an ambitious drive to organize plants owned by more than a dozen nonunion automakers, including Tesla and several foreign companies — a goal that has long eluded it.

  132. KG says

    “What this advertising boycott is going to do is it’s going to kill the company,” he [Musk] said. “And the whole world will know that those advertisers killed the company. It will be documented in great detail.”

    And for once, the whole world will owe those large, powerful and generally malign companies a vote of thanks!

  133. KG says

    Lynna, OM@153,

    I’ve seen it suggested that Tuberville’s real motive is to keep as many senior military posts as he can vacant so Trump can appoint his cronies if he wins next year’s election.

  134. lumipuna says

    From the Daily Kos, quoted by Lynna at 142:

    Russia has apparently been delivering about 900 refugees a day from countries such as Morocco, Pakistan, and Syria to the Finnish border, but over the last week, Finland has been closing the gates … Finland is reportedly concerned that Russia is using legitimate migrants to disguise agents and influencers being moved across the border.

    To be clear, 900 (or currently about 1000) is the total number of asylum seekers who have arrived from Russia since early November. It’s not a very impressive number as such, but there’s much concern about potential escalation, or something more nefarious. It’s not entirely clear what kind of threat assessment our government has done behind closed doors. It might involve on some classified intelligence about potential threats, or it might be just pandering to kneejerk racist voters.

    Shortly before the last border crossing at Raja-Jooseppi was closed, international reporter crews began visiting there. However, the situation was very anticlimactic, since practically no asylum seekers arrived during the last couple days. This Guardian story from yesterday was likely based on an email interview:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/29/cruel-way-of-handling-humans-the-escalating-crisis-at-finlands-border

    There are similarities, certainly, with the migration crisis of 2015 and 2016, when about 1,700 people traversed Finland’s remote northern border crossings. But, for the head of the border guard’s international affairs unit, the tensions that have heightened in recent weeks between Helsinki and Moscow have resulted in a situation that is unique.

    Or rather, the tensions have heightened considerably since early 2022. During this previous debacle, there was much less sense of Russia being an enemy rogue state using migrants for hybrid warfare, and the bigger and more blatant migrant push operation by Belarus hadn’t yet begun.

    Many of the people arriving have done so by bicycle, a way for the people smugglers who have facilitated the asylum seekers’ journey across Russia to avoid detection at the border.

    Smugglers are understood to sell bikes to asylum seekers at inflated prices as part of their passage from St Petersburg. By road, the total journey from the Russian city to the most northerly border crossing at Raja-Jooseppi is more than 1,400km (870 miles).

    It’s not very clear why almost all of the migrants have crossed the border on bicycle. As I noted before, the bikes are not used for travel, except for the last 1 km or so. People use trains to get to St. Petersburg or Murmansk, and then the human smugglers operating with the FSB give them a car or bus ride to the border. Certainly someone is making money on junk bikes, which are then abandoned at Finnish border stations.

    Russian authorities are saying that they cannot prevent anyone to exit Russia if they have valid travel documents to Russia.

    This is indeed how the Russian Border Guard and Ministry of Foreign Affairs respond to Finnish queries. Meanwhile, Dmitry Peskov has told to Russian media audiences (who definitely have a right to be in Russia, but can’t freely access the border) that nobody is allowed to access the border without travel documents to the other country.

    However, the UN and refugee advocacy groups fear [the border closure] could prevent people from seeking asylum and warn that the border’s entire closure could contravene international law. During the closure, asylum seekers will instead be directed to airports and ports.

    Indeed, preventing people from seeking asylum is the whole point of Finland’s response.

    Incidentally, people without necessary travel documents are being systematically and globally prevented from boarding airplanes and ships to rich western countries, which is why land routes (or crossing the Mediterranean in unregulated boats) play a central role in the movement of asylum seekers and other undocumented migrants. Naturally, people without Schengen visas cannot legally enter Europe from any point, and in practice they’d have to (illegally) cross a land border to exercise their supposed right to seek asylum.

    The EU has also relied on agreements with neighboring outside countries such as Libya, Turkey and (until now) Russia to prevent third country undocumented migrants from accessing the EU borders. The Mediterranean border has been notoriously leaky nevertheless, but here up north we’ve been cozy and safe and haven’t gotten used to dealing with large numbers of migrants.

  135. lumipuna says

    This the Guardian on-site at Raja-Jooseppi, with some hilarious melodrama:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/30/this-may-be-just-the-beginning-the-guards-at-finlands-closed-russian-border

    The Guardian was given exclusive access to the border station shortly after its closure on Wednesday

    By “exclusive” they must mean there were no other media crews interviewing the border station staff at the same time.

    Since the closure of other border crossings farther south on Friday, 63 asylum seekers have arrived at Raja-Jooseppi. But on Wednesday, the Finnish border guard said they had had a “peaceful day”, with just 14 people leaving Finland, three people entering and no asylum-seeker arrivals.

    You have to appreciate the comedy of reporters traveling to the middle of nowhere, in arctic conditions, to witness this.

    On the other side of the border, the Kremlin said on Wednesday that any decision by Finland to permit a “concentration” of troops on its border would be seen by Moscow as a threat.

    That came after Poland offered to send military advisers to help Helsinki police the border. Finland said it had been unaware of the Polish offer.

    A handful of Polish border guards (not “military advisors”) and assisting staff have arrived in Finland to support our border guard, as a part of EU border supervision cooperation. Russia has called this a “threatening gesture”, while arguing that the Finnish border closure is a hysterical and disproportionate response to whatever has been happening.

  136. birgerjohansson says

    As you know by now, Kissinger is dead.

    If you want to participate in celebrating Kissmas (Nov 30) here is Kool and the Gang with “Celebration”
    Many of the recent comments at the song mention him- feel free to add to them 😊
    https://youtu.be/3GwjfUFyY6M

  137. says

    KG @177, interesting point. I don’t know if that is true, but it certainly sounds like something Trump and Tuberville would try to do.

    In other news: When Republican members of Congress try to argue that 3.9% unemployment reflects poorly on President Biden, there’s a problem.

    Every month, the story unfolds in roughly the same way. New job numbers come out; people are impressed by the resiliency of the U.S. economy; the Biden White House celebrates the data; and Republicans respond to the developments by pretending not to notice them.

    The motivation for their silence is obvious: GOP leaders don’t want to be seen criticizing good news, but they also don’t want to acknowledge encouraging economic figures that cast the Democratic incumbent in a positive light. So, they remain silent and hope that no one notices.

    On Wednesday, however, Rep. Guy Reschenthaler broached the subject his party’s leaders tend to ignore. In remarks delivered on the House floor, the Pennsylvania Republican began by arguing that the U.S. economy created just 1,500 jobs in October. [video at the link]

    That wasn’t even close to being true: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ last report, the economy created 150,000 jobs in October. The GOP congressman left off two zeroes, which in this instance, made a rather dramatic difference.

    But perhaps that was just a simple mistake. Maybe Reschenthaler misread the remarks prepared by his staff. Even more notable were his comments about the unemployment rate: “The unemployment rate rose to 3.9% in October.”

    While it’s true that the jobless rate inched higher, from 3.8% to 3.9%, if the Republican congressman is looking for things to criticize President Joe Biden about, I’d recommend looking elsewhere.

    […] when members of Congress suggest there’s something unfortunate about a 3.9% unemployment rate, there’s a problem.

    How many times, across the entirety of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, did the unemployment rate fall below 4%? Literally zero times. Economists quibble over the precise meaning of full employment, but for practical purposes, when the jobless rate is below 4%, it doesn’t get much better.

    When Biden took office in January 2021, unemployment stood at 6.3%. By the end of 2021, it was 3.9%. In the nearly two years that followed, the jobless rate has not climbed above 4%.

    Or put another way, 3.9% unemployment, in historical terms, is kind of amazing.

    Meanwhile, we’ve seen roughly 2.39 million jobs created so far this year, which is exceptional, and the U.S. economy has created roughly 14.4 million jobs since January 2021 — which is more than double the combined total of Donald Trump’s first three years.

    Guy Reschenthaler apparently sees this as an area of vulnerability for Biden. Reality suggests otherwise.

  138. says

    Washington Post:

    During a phone call with Kevin McCarthy weeks after his historic Oct. 3 removal as House speaker, Trump detailed the reasons he had declined to ask Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and other hard-right lawmakers to back off their campaign to oust the California Republican from his leadership position. … During the call, Trump lambasted McCarthy for not expunging his two impeachments

  139. birgerjohansson says

    Lumipuna @ 179

    The Finns think this is the beginning of “hybrid warfare” and want to stop it at an early phase.
    The refugees have reportedly been told “go to Finland”.

  140. says

    […] The newly disclosed documents reveal an extraordinary web of communications between Perry [Representative Scott Perry, a Republican from Pennsylvania], who is now the chair of the House Freedom Caucus, and key figures in Trump’s orbit. They include:

    A Dec. 12, 2020, text exchange with Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel discussing efforts to challenge Joe Biden’s victory in the election.

    A series of exchanges between Perry and a former DOJ colleague, Robert Gasaway, between Dec. 30, 2020, and Jan. 5, 2021, in which Perry embraced a plan to have then-Vice President Mike Pence “admit testimony” prior to the counting of electoral votes on Jan. 6, 2021. Perry agreed to “sell[] the idea” with a call to Trump, Pence and Trump adviser John Eastman, but Perry later alerted Gasaway that Pence’s chief of staff, Marc Short, “will not allow access.”

    […] A Nov, 12, 2020 text to Trump campaign lawyer Alex Cannon advising the campaign on challenges to the election results in Pennsylvania, as well as numerous other contacts with Trump-affiliated lawyers Jenna Ellis, Boris Epshteyn and Justin Clark.

    An exchange with Simone Gold, a doctor known for opposing the Covid vaccine who would later plead guilty to misdemeanors for her role in the breach of the Capitol on Jan. 6.

    Exchanges with numerous Pennsylvania state legislators, including Doug Mastriano, strategizing ways to challenge the state’s election results.

    Texts with “cybersecurity individuals” working with attorney Sidney Powell to challenge the election results, including Phil Waldron. In one exchange, Perry emailed former Trump National Security Council staffer Rich Higgins to relay an “incredibly spooky” allegation that the U.S. Army had confiscated election servers in Germany to help cover up fraud.

    In the days after the election was called for Biden, Perry told one ally, retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, that he would attempt to help get him or Sidney Powell booked on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show. The filing shows Perry was in touch at times with Phil Waldron, a purported cybersecurity expert working with Powell, and discussed ways to get a pipeline of information to state legislative leaders. […]

    But the exchanges with DOJ’s Clark — described in Smith’s federal indictment of Trump as one of six unnamed and unindicted co-conspirators in an effort to subvert the 2020 election — are perhaps the most revealing. Clark, then a low-profile figure who oversaw the Justice Department’s civil litigation in the final months of the presidential term, was introduced to Trump by Perry amid Trump’s effort to remain in office.

    Trump came close to appointing Clark as acting attorney general in the early days of 2021 before backing down amid a mass resignation threat by senior DOJ and White House officials. During this time, Clark pressured top DOJ officials to send a letter to state legislatures urging them to consider sending alternate slates of presidential electors to Congress, and he obtained a security clearance to review intelligence about potential foreign efforts to interfere in the election.

    Perry indicated in one newly disclosed exchange that Trump had personally approved a “presidential security clearance,” a comment that followed Clark asking Perry to ensure that Trump was aware that CIA Director Gina Haspel needed to supply him with “security clearance tickets” to access intelligence related to the 2020 election.

    In one exchange, Perry told Clark that Trump was upset with Clark for using the Justice Department to defend Pence against a lawsuit brought by another House member, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas). Gohmert was seeking a court ruling declaring that Pence had the power to unilaterally reject Biden’s electoral votes, but DOJ’s civil division — then under Clark’s leadership — stepped in to defend Pence against the suit, which failed.

    “[H]e’s not thrilled with your decision regarding Pence and Gohmert,” Perry texted.

    Clark responded, “The branch within Civil Division responsible for Gohmert brief refused to have anything to do with my brief.”

    The newly disclosed exchanges also include Perry’s contacts with other House members seeking to reverse Trump’s defeat or to raise challenges to the election results. Perry texted Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) on Nov. 7, 2020 that there was “concrete evidence” of fraud in Michigan. The same day and on Nov. 8, Perry “exchanged text messages with Congressmen Hice, Jordan, and Roy, about issues with ‘the Dominion voting system,’ prompting comment from Rep. Hice, ‘YES!! … And don’t forget, on the Trump campaign call this afternoon, they have uncovered ‘illegal ballot harvesting’ in 3 GA counties,’” the filing reveals.

    And Perry also exchanged texts with then Rep.-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene, who complained about “incompetence here in Georgia,” prompting Perry to respond, “Nothing can beat effective cheating.”

    Politico link

  141. says

    Dead at 100, Henry Kissinger Leaves Behind a Bloody Legacy, by David Corn.

    From Argentina to East Timor, his actions led to hundreds of thousands of deaths.

    Do not speak ill of the dead. That’s an honorable admonition. But what of the truth? When a person dies, should he be remembered accurately? That question is acutely posed by the demise of Henry Kissinger. The veteran diplomat passed away on Wednesday at the age of 100, leaving behind a long legacy that includes such highs as the opening to China, as well as foul deeds that resulted in mayhem and death—thousands and thousands of deaths. His obituaries will be filled with hosannas from the foreign policy establishment that hailed him as the wisest of wise men. Unfortunately, those who were slaughtered in part due to his global gamesmanship are not able to comment on his contribution to international affairs.

    Earlier this year, ahead of his centennial birthday, I published an assessment of his career. I noted, “Kissinger is indeed a monumental figure who shaped much of the past 50 years. He brokered the US opening to China and pursued detente with the Soviet Union during his stints as President Richard Nixon’s national security adviser and secretary of state. Yet it is an insult to history that he is not equally known and regarded for his many acts of treachery—secret bombings, coup-plotting, supporting military juntas—that resulted in the death of hundreds of thousands.” I provided a break-down of these episodes. Is it an appropriate moment to revisit Kissinger’s dark past? We can only imagine what the dead would say. Here’s the roll call. […]

    It’s easy to cast Kissinger as a master geostrategist, an expert player in the game of nations. But do the math. Hundreds of thousands of dead in Bangladesh, Cambodia, and East Timor, perhaps a million in total. Tens of thousands dead in Argentina’s Dirty War. Thousands killed and tens of thousands tortured by the Chilean military dictatorship, and a democracy destroyed. His hands were drenched in blood.

    […] There were no apologies from Kissinger. But the rest of us will owe history—and the thousands dead because of his diplomatic scheming—an apology, if we do not consider the man in full. Whatever his accomplishments, his legacy includes an enormous pile of corpses.

    Details at the link include facts related to:
    Cambodia (The US military dropped 540,000 tons of bombs. They didn’t just hit enemy outposts. The estimates of Cambodian civilians killed range between 150,000 and 500,000);

    Bangladesh (Kissinger and Nixon turned a blind eye to—arguably, they tacitly approved—Pakistan’s genocidal slaughter of 300,000 Bengalis, most of them Hindus);

    Chile (Kissinger backed Pinochet to the hilt); East Timor (Here was a “green light” from Kissinger (and Ford). Suharto’s brutal invasion of East Timor resulted in 200,000 deaths); Argentina (The Dirty War would claim the lives of an estimated 30,000 Argentine civilians).

  142. birgerjohansson says

    Do not forget that by dragging Laos and Cambodia into the war, Kissinger paved the way for the communist takeovers. The 1,5 million murdered by Khmer Rouge would not have happened without this intervention
    .
    We will not hear this voice again
    “…in the drunk tank…”
    https://youtu.be/j9jbdgZidu8

  143. says

    Followup to comment 188.

    It was just after 8 p.m. ET on Jan. 6, 2021. Law enforcement had just finished clearing the Capitol building, and Congress was beginning to reconvene to finish the task which Stop the Steal supporters had violently disrupted: formalizing Biden’s win, and Trump’s defeat, in the 2020 election.

    But Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) had his mind elsewhere.

    “Is this true?” he texted one of his legislative directors, attaching to the message a press release claiming that an Italian defense contractor had “switched votes throughout America” in the 2020 election.

    Perry was inquiring about ItalyGate, the theory which holds that Italian satellites zapped votes in the 2020 elections away from Trump and to Biden.

    A new tranche of texts from Perry, an influential figure in several prongs of Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election, were revealed on Wednesday in a previously sealed filing with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, where Perry has been fighting to block Special Counsel Jack Smith from accessing records on the congressman’s cell phone.

    […] Perry, along with then-acting assistant attorney general Jeff Clark, tried to enlist the DOJ in Trump’s attempt to reverse his loss while, texts show, attempting to use Clark’s access to government databases to verify pulp novel-esque allegations of foreign cyber espionage.

    […] On Dec. 30, he had already sent acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen a request to investigate the ItalyGate conspiracy theory.

    “Can you believe this?” Rosen replied in a message to another official.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/how-scott-perry-flew-off-the-deep-end-in-effort-to-debunk-trump-loss

    JFC. And Republicans like Scott Perry are actually elected officials. Sheesh.

  144. says

    A four-judge panel in the New York Appellate Division, First Judicial District, has reinstated the gag order barring Trump and his lawyers from posting, emailing, or speaking about the court and its staff.

    Link to PDF

  145. Reginald Selkirk says

    Hubble science instruments still out after going down 3 times in a week

    NASA has confirmed it is working to resume science operations on the Hubble Space Telescope after an ongoing gyroscope issue put it in safe mode.

    According to NASA, the instruments are stable and telescope is in good health, but a faulty reading from one of its gyros caused it to automatically enter safe mode, suspending science operations once again, on November 23rd…

  146. Jean says

    Re #188, 191

    Scott Perry is one of the many elected republicans who should be subject to section 3 of the 14th amendment. The whole republican party is trying to have all US election results be meaningless, i.e. kill democracy in the US. And no one is doing anything to correct this (half the population seems to be ok with it too). And the media are just concerned about poll results and stupid talking points.

  147. Reginald Selkirk says

    John Cornyn and Ted Cruz flee U.S. Senate hearing as Democrats vote on Harlan Crow subpoena

    U.S. Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz were among several Republicans who fled a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting Thursday to protest subpoenaing Dallas-based conservative donor Harlan Crow.

    The committee’s Democrats are seeking records over payments, gifts and travel Crow reportedly provided Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, some of which were not initially listed on financial disclosures. The committee’s GOP members cast the subpoena authorization as a partisan attack against one of the most conservative members of the court and a private citizen.

    The Republicans left the committee room as the roll call vote was taking place. Committee rules require a quorum of nine members including at least two members of the minority. But since the Republicans left during the vote, it’s unclear whether they counted toward a quorum.

    All 11 Democrats voted to authorize the subpoena and declared the move adopted…

  148. says

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/elizabeth-warren-has-declared-war

    Earlier this week, Elizabeth Warren posted on social media in support of the FTC investigating private equity firm Roark Capital (yes, the name references exactly what you think it references) for attempting to create a mediocre-at-best sandwich shop monopoly by purchasing Subway when it already owns Jimmy John’s and McAlister’s Deli.

    “We don’t need another private equity deal that could lead to higher food prices for consumers.” Warren wrote on social media on Monday. “The FTC is right to investigate whether the purchase of SUBWAY by the same firm that owns jimmyjohns and McAlistersDeli creates a sandwich shop monopoly.”

    Was she wrong? Absolutely not. Private equity is ruining this country. But a bunch of right-wing pro-monopoly weirdos went bananas in the responses to her with comments mocking the idea of “Big Sandwich” being a serious problem for the government to deal with.

    In fact, right-wing media has been whining about it all week, leading up to today, when the National Review published a Very Serious op-ed attacking Warren for the tweet and arguing that it is impossible for there to be a sandwich monopoly on the grounds that anyone can make a sandwich.

    No, really.

    Via National Review:

    Of course, to Warren and her progressive ilk, a “monopoly” is simply a company that has gotten so successful it suddenly deserves regulation. As Adam Smith put it, “a monopoly granted either to an individual or to a trading company has the same effect as a secret in trade or manufactures.”

    […] Obviously, larger companies are going to be subject to more regulation, not because anyone is mad at their success and doesn’t want them to be happy, but because mistakes they make will have a larger impact. Though to be clear, I feel fairly confident that the rule that businesses with fewer than 15 employees are not subject to federal anti-discrimination laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act or the Civil Rights Act (though state laws may differ) was not thought up by the Left.

    But, of course, there is no monopoly on sandwich-making primarily because there is no trade secret. It is simply surrounding a filling with two slices of bread. This is a process so rudimentary that people do it at home. They do it on picnics. They do it with lettuce and braunschweiger. They do it with peanut butter and jelly. It is a meal so simple we teach children to make it themselves.

    This point was also argued by an obvious genius in Warren’s replies, who wrote “Anyone can make a sandwich, even you probably. It’s bread and lunch meat. A monopoly can’t exist in the ‘sandwich shop’ sector.”

    If only Warren’s correspondent and Schneider had been around nearly a decade ago to tell Jimmy John’s there are no sandwich secrets, the company never would have forced workers to sign non-compete agreements.

    It can, however, exist in the “large sandwich shop chain” sector and that is also a problem. This isn’t about controlling all of the sandwiches; no one is suggesting that if this company buys Subway that no one will be able to make their own sandwiches at home. This is about the fact that it is a legitimate interest of the FTC to ensure that one company doesn’t have a controlling interest in a segment of any industry.

    The fact is, private equity firms kinda ruin everything. Roark also bought Dunkin’ Donuts (now just Dunkin’, which remains weird) and what did they come out with this year? A coffee beverage with Munchkins mixed in. Now, we all love Ice Spice, but that is very unappealing! [video at the link]

    It doesn’t stop at wet-bread frappes. Private equity firms buying up lots of individual companies leads to job losses, lower wages and higher prices across the board. And when they get involved with prisons or nursing homes, things can actually get dangerous.

    Schneider goes on to try to make jokes about people who ask whether or not things are sandwiches online and to reference an op-ed from 1910 titled “The Club Sandwich — Why?” and suggesting that if ol’ Liz Warren were in charge back then that there would be no club sandwiches. Because that’s what this is about. Actual sandwich regulation. [/sarcasm]

    He then tried to make the case that such a move would actually lower prices for consumers, a thing that has never, ever, ever happened in the history of ever.

    […] savings will never, ever be passed onto consumers.

    He also has a swell theory that “greedflation” only happened because customers wanted to pay more for things, not because companies used actual inflation to cover for raising prices to line their own pockets.

    Warren has spent years arguing that the rising cost of goods is the result of “greedflation” — corporations boosting prices during hard times to goose their profits. But not only do such price hikes typically take place in the wake of a recession, the idea of “greedflation” gets consumer spending wrong in exactly the opposite way. Companies charge more because consumers have more money, not because they have less. A report by the Kansas City Federal Reserve showed that, most recently, household income actually rose during the pandemic-induced recession. And thus consumers were willing to pay more for goods. And yet the White House and others blamed increasing meat prices on Big Meat rather than on both consumers’ desire for beef and their ability to pay for it.

    That’s still greed. People were willing to pay more for things, for a time, due to scarcity and being in an emergency situation. Keeping prices that high post-scarcity? That’s greed.

    The best part of this whole thing, however — where Schneider shows he really gets it — is where he suggests that if Warren really wanted sandwich prices to go down, she and other progressives should fight for poverty wages, not against.

    Finally, Democrats insist on increasing the cost of hiring individuals to work in these sandwich restaurants, as state and local governments continue to hike minimum wages for hourly employees. Those increased costs are either recouped by hiring fewer employees or passing the costs on to consumers.

    Again, part of the issue with private equity companies is that they very frequently cause wages to go down. We want people to make a decent living so they can afford to eat sandwiches themselves. This is not hard!

    The issue isn’t the sandwiches at Subway or Jimmy John’s […] The issue is private equity firms getting away with too much and controlling too much of any economic sector.

    We need to be looking at what private equity firms are doing, because whether the people mocking Warren want to understand this or not, this is something that affects all of us — it hurts the economy and it hurts our ability as consumers to vote with our dollar.

  149. Reginald Selkirk says

    Stop the presses! Rand Paul did a good thing.

    Rand Paul uses Heimlich maneuver on Ernst during Senate GOP lunch

    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) used the Heimlich maneuver on Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) during the Senate GOP’s Thursday lunch after she choked on part of her meal.

    Ernst said as much on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, thanking Paul for intervening.

    “Can’t help but choke on the woke policies Dems are forcing down our throats. Thanks, Dr. @RandPaul !” she wrote, referencing a post from Politico.

    Ernst hosted the Thursday luncheon, which is provided weekly by a member and frequently features their home state’s delicacies. Her fellow Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) posted about the meal shortly beforehand, which was headlined by pork chops from the Hawkeye State.

    What a horrible person Ernst appears to be. She chokes on her own food and tries to blame Democrats.

  150. says

    Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans tried to shut the committee down Thursday with histrionic fits and manufactured outrage over Democrats’ plans to proceed with subpoenas to GOP mega-donor Harlan Crow and conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo. They failed, walking into a procedural trap of their own making; the committee voted 11-0 to issue the subpoenas.

    Republicans got obnoxious right out of the gate, objecting to Chair Dick Durbin’s efforts to finish with some housekeeping matters. There were a few judicial nominees that had already been approved, but needed a third vote because of a procedural technicality GOP senators had attempted to use to kill the nominations. Republicans repeatedly shouted down the clerk who was trying to conduct the roll call votes, and tried to filibuster. Durbin, citing the precedent of former Republican chairs Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham, pushed ahead on the nominees against Republican opposition, resulting in more histrionics from the GOP members.

    The Republicans’ goal was to waste two hours of committee time so they could invoke a rule that limits the committee’s sessions to two hours. They had 177 amendments to the subpoenas lined up if they couldn’t waste those two hours on the nominees. But Durbin had a procedural ace up his sleeve and the votes to use it. He suspended the two-hour rule, and all 11 Democrats voted to issue the subpoenas, while the Republicans all walked out.

    “They think we’re gonna roll over and come back sometime later and try all over again and face the same limitations,” Durbin told Politico after the brouhaha. “You know, there reaches a point where there has to be a vote. They walked out on it. That’s their decision.”

    Unsurprisingly, Politico reports, Leo issued a statement saying he would refuse to comply. “Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats have been destroying the Supreme Court; now they are destroying the Senate,” Leo said. “I will not cooperate with this unlawful campaign of political retribution.” Since he’s handpicked a great many of the federal judges under the last two Republican presidents, he’s probably confident that he’d end up in front of a friendly one if Durbin pushes the matter.

    Watch Graham’s meltdown and Durbin’s refusal to allow the committee to be hijacked yet again. [video at the link]

    Link

  151. says

    More Russian stuff blowing up: Ukraine blows up 15 km train tunnel in Siberia

    Just the other day Ukrainian President Zelenskyy hinted that Ukraine would make some long-range strikes against Russia soon. Last night Ukraine delivered, blowing up a fuel train inside a tunnel that is the main rail line between Russia and China.

    The SBU (Ukrainian security services) blew up the train inside the 15.3-kilometer-long Severomuysky Tunnel in Buryatia, which is north of Mongolia and about 4,000 km from Ukraine. How they managed to pull that off has not been revealed.

    It is significant that the explosion was said to have happened while the train was in the tunnel. Just blowing up the train on the tracks would not put the line out of action for that long — maybe a month or two. But blowing the train inside the tunnel will cause major problems. […]
    ——————————-
    Destroying a warehouse full of Shaheed drones used to target Ukrainian cities is a major accomplishment. [Tweet and images at the link.]
    ——————————–
    Taking out a building full of drone operators is as good as taking out Russian artillery. [video at the link]
    ——————————-
    A Russian air-defense system creates a big bavovna. [Tweet and video at the link: Kherson Oblast, Ukrainian forces released what is most likely some of the first footage of a US-supplied AGM-88 HARM anti-radar missile hitting, and destroying, a Russian Buk-M2 SAM system.]
    ———————————
    […] About 20 people from the [Russian marine brigade] lit a fire during their lunch break nearby with ammunition storage. The RPG-7 grenade launcher shell rolled into the fire and exploded. Eight people died on the spot, another eight were injured. All those injured and killed were contract soldiers from Vladivostok. Four seriously wounded soldiers died in hospital within a few days. […]

  152. says

    YouTube link to Jimmy KImmel segment.

    Kimmel discusses Republicans DESPERATE to Smear Biden [by focusing on Fox News freaking out over Joe Biden’s use of a large straw to drink a milkshake], and other subjects, like cutting Christmas trees.

  153. StevoR says

    Seems we could be seeing some aurorae soon :

    Aurora chasers around the world are eagerly awaiting the arrival of a super-hot plasma eruption — known as a coronal mass ejection (CME) — that will slam into Earth tonight.

    The rapid Earth-bound CME left the sun on Nov. 29 during a powerful M9.8-class solar flare eruption. But it isn’t alone. The speedy plasma outburst will merge with several slower upstream CMEs that left the sun a day earlier (Nov. 28), creating a “Cannibal CME” that will likely trigger a strong geomagnetic storm akin to a Nov. 5 event that supercharged auroras and STEVE around the world.

    Source : https://www.space.com/cannibal-cme-solar-outburst-will-hit-earth-dec-1-2023-triggering-auroras

  154. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    SciAm – Space junk is polluting Earth’s stratosphere with vaporized metal

    potential environmental hazards that remain poorly understood. […] the metals are accumulating within sulfuric acid particles, which constitute most of the stratosphere’s particulates and influence our world’s ozone layer and climate. […] only very recently—in the past few years—has the contribution from falling space junk come to rival, or […] even exceed, that from this natural background. […] most of the aluminum, copper and lithium now found in the stratosphere is from space junk.
    […]
    What is clear is that this metallic pollution is set to accelerate […] Thanks in large part to […] satellite “mega constellations” such as SpaceX’s Starlink and Amazon’s Project Kuiper, the global launch industry is on track to loft as many as 50,000 new satellites into orbit by 2030. […] what goes up must come down […] debris pumping more metals into the stratosphere.
    […]
    “When you have potentially 50,000 satellites in orbit, and they have a five-year lifetime, that’s 10,000 reentries a year—something like 30 a day. That is very different than the situation in the past […]”

  155. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    Sam Lawler in Nature – Bright satellites are disrupting astronomy
    ^ unpaywalled author link.

    they remain sunlit long after the sky has grown dark. […] one of the newest […] outshines all but a handful of the brightest visible stars. It exemplifies how, without stronger regulation, satellites could substantially change the view of the night sky worldwide, and severely jeopardize future use of Earth’s orbit
    […]
    SpaceX […] owns and operates 57% of the 8,859 total active satellites
    […]
    astronomers require more telescope time for the same scientific return because a portion of data will be lost to satellites ‘photobombing’ telescopes every night. […] Satellites have already added noise to radio astronomy observations and even to images from the Hubble Space Telescope. […] Most governments require corporations to pay fines to those affected by a firm’s pollution. Perhaps it’s time to require […] compensation for the negative impact they are having on taxpayer-funded astronomy research. Even the task of measuring the brightness of satellites […] has been left to […] astronomers […] these observations took away time from astrophysical research
    […]
    [Those astronomers also tracked a large satellite that jettisoned another, smaller one.] its orbit was not publicly reported for four days after the two objects parted ways. This lag is a potential problem for researchers attempting to mitigate […] by […] pointing telescopes elsewhere
    […]
    A single unreported satellite doesn’t pose a substantial risk of a collision, but that risk quickly multiplies if it becomes standard to report satellites days after they enter orbit
    […]
    the worst-case scenario: the onset of full Kessler syndrome would prevent the use of communication, weather, science and astronautical satellites in low Earth orbit for decades. And it is unclear whether a spacecraft could even be launched successfully through the debris shell […] Humans would effectively be trapped on Earth by space junk, with multiple tonnes of vaporized metal being added to the upper atmosphere every day

  156. StevoR says

    Moere exoplanet stuff and links here :

    https://proxy.freethought.online/pharyngula/2023/11/29/frivolous-space-tourism/comment-page-1/#comment-2203282

    By law, the logging agency is required to regenerate the areas it has logged and hand them back to the public in a healthy state. But until now, how much that has actually happened has largely been a mystery. An AI-based analysis of 20 years of VicForests’ logging, researchers say, shows the scale of failed regeneration in Victoria’s state forests. The data, which has been shared exclusively with the ABC, suggests that 20 per cent of Victoria’s state forests have not regenerated after logging.

    ..(Snip).. Across Victoria, close to a fifth of all logged land was classified as not regenerated, according to the researchers. That’s almost 13,000 hectares of state forest the analysis found to be standing in a state of ruin.“The logging industry is basically walking away and handing this forest back in a disgraceful manner,” said Trent Patten from Wildlife of the Central Highlands, a conservation group that commissioned and funded the analysis. …(snip)..Leading forest ecologist Professor David Lindenmayer has been researching that question, and has found a range of reasons why forests don’t grow back after logging. He said logging could damage soil in two key ways: it can deplete the earth of nutrients, and the machinery can cause severe compaction. Another reason for the failure is the changing climate.The new trees are trying to germinate in a different world to the one the logged forests established themselves in decades or even a century earlier. Another cause of failed regrowth is feral deer, which love to eat young trees, said Professor Lindenmayer.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-01/ai-analysis-finds-failed-forest-regrowth-after-logging-/103153614

  157. StevoR says

    Inadequate as ever :

    The world just took a tentative step toward compensating countries hit by deadly floods, heat and droughts. Nearly all nations on Thursday finalised the creation of a fund to help compensate countries struggling to cope with loss and damage caused by climate change, seen as a major first-day breakthrough at this year’s UN climate conference. Some countries started putting in money right away.

    The amount was small compared to the overall anticipated needs. ..(snip)..

    ..A recent report by the United Nations estimates that up to $US387 billion will be needed annually if developing countries are to adapt to climate-driven changes.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-01/cop28-nations-begin-meagre-climate-fund/103175512

    I expect that last figure willbe a really gross under-estimate and of course, thelives and sufferingand lingeringand escalating damage is really incalculable.

  158. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    NYTimes – Israel knew Hamas’s attack plan more than a year ago

    Israeli officials obtained Hamas’s battle plan for the Oct. 7 terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents, emails and interviews show. But Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out.
    […]
    The translated document, which was reviewed by The New York Times, did not set a date for the attack, but described a methodical assault designed to overwhelm the fortifications around the Gaza Strip, take over Israeli cities and storm key military bases, including a division headquarters.

    Hamas followed the blueprint with shocking precision. The document called for a barrage of rockets at the outset of the attack, drones to knock out the security cameras and automated machine guns along the border, and gunmen to pour into Israel en masse in paragliders, on motorcycles and on foot—all of which happened on Oct. 7.

    The plan also included details about the location and size of Israeli military forces, communication hubs and other sensitive information, raising questions about how Hamas gathered its intelligence
    […]
    The document circulated widely among Israeli military and intelligence leaders, but experts determined that an attack of that scale and ambition was beyond Hamas’s capabilities, according to documents and officials.
    […]
    Then, in July, just three months before the attacks, a veteran analyst […] warned that Hamas had conducted an intense […] exercise that appeared similar to what was outlined in the blueprint. But a colonel in the Gaza division brushed off her concerns
    […]
    Officials privately concede that, had the military taken these warnings seriously […] Israel could have blunted the attacks or possibly even prevented them.

  159. lotharloo says

    I was bored and I decided to check Jerry’s blog. So there you go, comments that openly call for murder of Palestinians.

    Leslie MacMillan
    November 30, 2023 at 11:30 am

    The Palestinians are a Jew-hating death cult. No Jewish polity can make peace with them as they are today. Richard Hananian argues, and I agree, that not enough Palestinians in Gaza have been killed yet as human shields for them to resign themselves to the futility of continuing to try to kill Jews. …
    A two-state solution will not work either, for much the same reason a one-state solution won’t work. As long as you have neighbours on your border who spend all their time trying to kill you, the situation is not stable. And you can’t keep invading a foreign hostile state every few years because your allies won’t let you conquer it. The only two-state solution that might work would be a Palestinian state that has a large expanse of desert belonging to some other country serving as what historians call a glacis* between it and Israel, and moving the Palestinians forcibly into that new state. Maybe somewhere in the middle of Saudi Arabia. Or Yemen. Maybe they can find oil on it and get rich. But a Palestinian state on Israel’s borders? No way. Not after 7 October.

    Jerry later responds but he had nothing to say against “we gotta kill more Palestinians” likely because he agrees. He just chimes in to say that he agrees that one-state solution doesn’t work.

  160. birgerjohansson says

    The major threat to humankind – apart from nuclear war, and quite certain upcoming disasters like, more pandemics and climate change- is a giant geomagnetic storm, or Carrington event.
    Think Bruce Willis fighting baddies destroying communications and the electric grid, except this time it is nature.
    There was a biggie in 1859, and two slightly smaller ones 1872 and 1921.
    We are overdue for the next one.

    https://phys.org/news/2023-11-largest-magnetic-storms-history-quantified.html

    I recall Scientific American warned for the results of a hurricane hitting New Orleans several years before hurricane Katrina.
    Politicians did not act then, either. 🥺

  161. Reginald Selkirk says

    Giant Stone Age Cemetery Near Arctic Circle Surprises Archaeologists

    The soil in one of the largest Stone Age cemeteries in Europe is so acidic that all the human remains were destroyed thousands of years ago. But now, a team of archaeologists reviewing the site have found that at least 120 people were once buried there, three times previous estimates.

    The cemetery, located at Tainiaro in Finnish Lapland, is 6,500 years old and is about 50 miles (80 kilometers) south of the Arctic Circle. Excavations of the site in the 1980s and 1990s revealed about forty graves across one-tenth of the site’s total area. But excavations conducted in 2018 have found that there were once three times that number, and possibly more than 200. The team’s research was published today in Antiquity…

  162. Reginald Selkirk says

    Elon Musk’s Boring Company Has Drilled A Grand Total Of 2.4 Miles In 7 Years

    At the outset of the Boring Company’s plans to build a network of underground tunnels in Las Vegas, Elon Musk claimed that the Boring Company would build one mile of tunnel per week. At that rate, the proposed 68-mile network would have taken little more than one year to build out entirely. But seven years on, the Boring Company has completed only 2.4 miles of tunnels in Las Vegas, as Fortune reports…

  163. Reginald Selkirk says

    Speaker Johnson wrote foreword for book filled with conspiracy theories and homophobic insults

    Speaker of the House Mike Johnson wrote the foreword and publicly promoted a 2022 book that spread baseless and discredited conspiracy theories and used derogatory homophobic insults.

    Written by Scott McKay, a local Louisiana politics blogger, the book, “The Revivalist Manifesto,” gives credence to unfounded conspiracy theories often embraced by the far-right – including the “Pizzagate” hoax, which falsely claimed top Democratic officials were involved in a pedophile ring, among other conspiracies.

    The book also propagates baseless and inaccurate claims, implying that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was subjected to blackmail and connected to the disgraced underage sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein…

  164. Reginald Selkirk says

    Rail havoc in Russia after second explosion in as many days destroys key ‘Devil’s Bridge’ – NV souces

    Another fuel train explosion on Russia’s Baikal-Amur Mainline signals the second phase of a strategic operation by Ukraine’s SBU to disrupt this vital railway route, sources told NV.

    Russians utilize this mainline, including for military logistics purposes.

    The initial incident occurred in the Severomuiskii Tunnel, prompting Russians to divert their use of the line through a bypass route known as the “Devil’s Bridge.” However, during a train’s passage on this towering 35-meter bridge, embedded explosive devices were triggered, resulting in the ignition of six tanks, Russian Telegram channels reported…

  165. tomh says

    From the Messenger

    Friday is set to be a packed day for Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee with morning and afternoon hearings scheduled to sort through a raft of pretrial motions in the ongoing Georgia election racketeering criminal case against Donald Trump and the former president’s 14 remaining co-defendants.

    The morning session will cover eight pre-trial motions to dismiss the charges or quash the entire 41-count Fulton County grand jury indictment originally brought in August against 19 people overall, including the former president. It also marks the first time that Trump’s Georgia-based legal team of Steve Sadow and co-counsel Jennifer Little will be in position to go directly toe-to-toe with District Attorney Fani Willis’ prosecutors.

    Streaming live right now on C-Span.

  166. says

    Facing multiple Jan. 6 lawsuits from police officers, Donald Trump has claimed “absolute immunity.” A federal appeals court didn’t buy it.

    ]…] Donald Trump has tried to get the civil cases thrown out, claiming he has “absolute immunity” in actions related to his term in office. As NBC News reported, a federal appeals court this morning rejected that argument.

    “The sole issue before us is whether President Trump has demonstrated an entitlement to official-act immunity for his actions leading up to and on January 6 as alleged in the complaints. We answer no, at least at this stage of the proceedings,” a panel of judges from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. said in its ruling. The three judges noted that Trump is alleged to have instigated the riot during the course of his re-election campaign, and said, “When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act.”

    [Excellent logic.]

    The panel included one judge nominated by Barack Obama, one nominated by Bill Clinton, and one nominated by Trump.

    […] in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack, among those who filed lawsuits against Trump were police officers injured during the insurrectionist violence. In fact, multiple cases were filed:
    – In March 2021, two Capitol Police officers, James Blassingame and Sidney Hemby, sued Trump, claiming he was liable for the injuries they suffered during the riot.

    – In August 2021, seven more police officers who were attacked and beaten during the Capitol riot sued the former president.

    – In January 2022, three more police officers — including two who aided the evacuation of lawmakers — sued Trump, seeking damages for their physical and emotional injuries.

    – In January 2023, the longtime partner of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who died after the Jan. 6 riot, filed a wrongful death civil suit against Trump.

    Last year, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta rejected the “absolute immunity” argument, ruling that Trump could be held liable for damages. “To deny a president immunity from civil damages is no small step. The court well understands the gravity of its decision,” the jurist wrote in his decision. “But the alleged facts of this case are without precedent, and the court believes that its decision is consistent with the purposes behind such immunity.”

    The Republican and his legal defense team, not surprisingly, appealed the ruling, hoping to convince the D.C. Circuit of Appeals that Trump’s defense has merit. That didn’t work, clearing the way for the officers’ civil cases to proceed.

    But the impact might prove even broader. As NBC News’ report added, “Trump has made a similar immunity claim in special counsel Jack Smith’s criminal case charging that he illegally tried to overturn the election results. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has not yet ruled on the issue.”

    With this in mind, it’s a safe bet that Chutkan took note of the D.C. Circuit’s decision.

  167. says

    Gavin Newsom and Ron DeSantis debate

    […] The showdown — dubbed “The Great Red vs. Blue State Debate” by Fox News — featured spirited exchanges on tax, education, abortion, energy, immigration, Covid and crime policy, with both DeSantis and Newsom warning that their opponent’s models would be disastrous for the country if they were exported nationwide.

    […] The two men agreed to debate each other in August, setting up a contest between DeSantis — a current presidential candidate and possibly a future one if he fails to nab the Republican presidential nomination this cycle — and Newsom, a governor who is considered a likely future presidential contender and is serving now as a top surrogate for President Joe Biden.

    […] During an exchange on immigration policy, Newsom said DeSantis’ strategy was merely “trolling folks” and “trying to find migrants to play political games, trying to get some news and attention so you can out-Trump Trump.”

    “And by the way, how’s that going for you, Ron?” Newsom said. “You’re down 41 points in your own home state.”

    […] DeSantis talked up keeping businesses like Walt Disney World open early in the pandemic while blasting Newsom for school and business closings.

    “You were not following science,” DeSantis said. “You were a lockdown governor. You did a lot of damage to your people.”

    Newsom countered that DeSantis had initially closed down businesses at the onset of the outbreak and followed guidance from Dr. Anthony Fauci, then the nation’s top infectious diseases expert, whom DeSantis has railed against over the past few years.

    “You followed science; you followed Fauci,” Newsom said, adding that DeSantis had also previously worn a mask and promoted Covid vaccines. “He decided to fall prey to the fringe of his party, and as a consequence of that, Ron, tens of thousands of people lost their lives.”

    […] “Joe Biden is in the pocket of the teachers union, and so is Kamala Harris,” DeSantis said.

    […] DeSantis, at two points, used props to help back up his assertions. In one instance, he held up a map purporting to show documented instances of human feces that were reported on the streets of San Francisco. At another moment, he held up imagery of cartoon depictions of sex acts from the book “Gender Queer,” which was removed from Florida school districts.

    Newsom took issue with DeSantis’ framing of restrictions on books in public schools and said his education platform was a “sword” he used to launch broader attacks on LGBTQ Americans.

    “I don’t like the way you demean people,” Newsom said. “I don’t like the way you demean the LGBTQ community. I don’t like the way you demean and humiliate people you disagree with, Ron. I really find this fundamentally offensive, and this is a core value that distinguishes the values of my state and, frankly, the vast majority of Americans against the weaponization of education.”

    […] “I’ll give Gavin credit, he did at least admit in his first answer he’s joined at the hip with Biden and Harris,” DeSantis said. “He thinks Biden and Harris have done a great job. He thinks the economy is working because of their policies for Americans, and they are not. And so what California represents is the Biden-Harris agenda on steroids.”

    Newsom countered that DeSantis promoted $28 million in investments in semiconductor and chip manufacturing made possible by legislation Biden signed. And, taking issue with how Hannity framed some questions, he said Fox News viewers weren’t being presented with positive economic news, including wage growth, cooling inflation and substantial growth in the gross domestic product in the previous quarter.

    While the presidential campaign played a secondary role in the debate, both candidates were pressed about whether they felt Biden was up for four more years.

    “Yes, he’s in decline,” DeSantis said. “Yes, it’s a danger to the country. He has no business running for president. And you know, Gavin Newsom agrees with that. He won’t say that. That’s why he’s running his shadow campaign. [Biden] should not be running. He is not up to the job. and it is dangerous for this country.”

    Newsom disagreed that he’s running a shadow campaign for president, saying DeSantis was “making this stuff up.” He said he “will take Joe Biden at 100 vs. Ron DeSantis any day of the week at any age.”

    Biden “will be our nominee in a matter of weeks,” Newsom said. “And in a matter of weeks, Sean, [DeSantis will] be endorsing Donald Trump as the nominee for the Republican Party.” […]

  168. says

    NBC News:

    The House voted overwhelmingly to expel indicted Rep. George Santos on Friday, pulling the curtain down on a tempestuous term in office that was marred by revelations that he’d fabricated parts of his biography, a scathing House ethics investigation and a 23-count federal indictment charging him with crimes like wire fraud and money laundering.

    Commentary:

    […] The final tally was 311-114, with two members voting present. A two-thirds majority was necessary — in this instance, 290 votes — and proponents cleared the threshold with relative ease.

    It’s difficult to overstate how unusual this is. Capitol Hill has featured plenty of scandal-plagued members in recent generations, but successful expulsion votes have only happened three times since the Civil War. In 1980, Democratic Rep. Michael Myers of Pennsylvania was expelled over his involvement with the Abscam scandal, and Democratic Rep. Jim Traficant of Ohio was expelled in 2002 after he was convicted on multiple corruption charges.

    Santos has now joined the small and ignominious club.

    At this point, he officially became a former member of Congress the moment the vote concluded. His seat is now vacant, and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul will have to schedule a special election in the state’s 3rd Congressional District. That race is expected to be highly competitive.

    As for his current office, NBC News reported that under congressional rules, the House clerk “is responsible for supervising the staff and managing the office of any member who dies or resigns or is expelled until a successor is elected.”

    But as the dust settles on a truly amazing political tale, it’s worth appreciating just how difficult it was to kick the New York Republican out of office. Santos was exposed as a prolific liar before he was even sworn in as a freshman lawmaker. At the time, House GOP leaders nevertheless treated him as a member in good standing.

    In May, the Justice Department charged the then-congressman with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives. Republican leaders again ignored those who said Santos should be forced out.

    In October, prosecutors filed additional charges against Santos, accusing him of, among other things, identity theft and charging a supporter’s credit card and then transferring the money to his personal bank account.

    Republican leaders once again rebuffed those who said Santos should be ousted, and a second attempted expulsion vote fell far short.

    But a recent report from the House Ethics Committee changed the nature of the debate. As my MSNBC colleague Clarissa-Jan Lim recently reported, the House Ethics Committee issued a brutal, 56-page report on Nov. 16, concluding that the freshman lawmaker “sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit,” including using campaign funds for personal use, deceiving donors who thought they were contributing to his campaign, and reporting “fictitious loans” to his political committees to “induce” additional contributions.

    “And he sustained all of this through a constant series of lies to his constituents, donors, and staff about his background and experience,” the report added.

    The panel’s members went on to say that it found “substantial evidence” of criminal wrongdoing — beyond the crimes Santos has already been charged with — and they voted unanimously to refer the evidence to federal prosecutors.

    Despite all of this, in the third and final expulsion effort, 112 Republicans and a pair of House Democrats opposed the effort to kick him out of the chamber. Among those who voted “no”: the entirety of the House GOP leadership, including Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Majority Whip Tom Emmer and Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik. [And others, including Matt Gaetz]

    […] there are no laws or rules that would prohibit Santos from running for office again. […]

    Link

  169. says

    On Thursday, the Supreme Court of the State of New York reinstated a narrow gag order against Donald Trump that prohibits him from making statements about court staff. The order was originally put in place by Judge Arthur Engoron after Trump repeatedly attacked law clerk Allison Greenfield, including falsely claiming that she was the “girlfriend” of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Trump’s statements have been tied to multiple threats on the life of both Greenfield and Engoron.

    In response, Trump posted a series of false claims about Engoron’s wife, using a widely debunked series of images posted by conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer. Trump also reposted the images along with statements sure to generate threats against Engoron’s wife and family.

    Not only is this vivid confirmation that Trump is a low-life POS, it’s also an obvious threat aimed at every prosecutor, judge, or other member of the justice system who tries to hold him to account for his crimes.

    Loomer’s original “exclusive” was based on posting several images from an account on X (formerly known as Twitter) that had messages indicating Trump was a criminal. [Examples at the link]

    Loomer’s original “exclusive” was based on posting several images from an account on X (formerly known as Twitter) that had messages indicating Trump was a criminal. [Examples at the link]

    Loomer’s original post on X has now been viewed over 13 million times. Responses to that post have included numerous threats and accusations against Engoron. That includes at least one supporter who located the Engoron family home, provided it to Loomer, and offered to join in harassing them.

    Online observers immediately noted that Loomer had no evidence that the posts had been made by Engoron’s wife. The following day, Newsweek spoke with Dawn Engoron, who made it clear she had no connection to the account Loomer cited. New York’s Office of Court Administration has since confirmed that the account did not belong to Engoron’s wife, that Dawn Engoron doesn’t even have a Twitter account, and that she never posted the images Loomer used.

    None of this stopped Loomer and her followers from continuing to spread the images and elaborating on lies about Engoron, his wife, and his family.

    On Wednesday, Trump began reposting the images on his Truth Social platform. He kept right on posting them on Thursday, even after the gag order had been reinstated. [Examples at the link]

    Since Engoron was not protected under the intentionally narrow gag order, it’s unlikely that these reposts are in violation of that order. Trump has made or reposted a number of false claims and threats against Engoron, including one suggesting that Engoron and New York Attorney General Letitia James be subject to “citizen’s arrest.”

    Trump is issuing clear threats to Engoron and other members of the court, showing that he’ll go to any lengths in his constant search for revenge. Their spouses, family, and friends are not off limits for Trump. To underscore this, a hearing just last week revealed hundreds of “serious and credible“ threats each day made against Engoron and Williams even before Trump began repeating Loomer’s “Engoron crime family” images.

    This is a blatant and obvious effort to rule through fear.

    With multiple criminal cases to follow the New York civil fraud trial, it’s also a message that is sure to be heard by every judge, clerk, and prosecutor Trump will be facing in the coming weeks. And something that will be viscerally felt by every member of their families.

    Link

    I am appalled.

  170. says

    Going to end the day with a clip of Governor Gavin Newsom crushing fascist weak scumbag Ron DeSantis’ fragile ego. Good night. 💙👊

    https://twitter.com/TheRickyDavila/status/1730487228625981530

    See also: Gavin Newsom’s Fox performance sets X-witter on FIRE

    […] Newsom pointed out that cities in Florida have a 66% higher murder rate than cities like San Francisco.

    […] I watched the end of the debate and the follow-on program with the regular Fox crowd and all four of their pundits — while giving credit to Newsom — gave their thumbs up and the “Victory” on the evening to DeSantis who just spouted the same tired dishonest rhetoric that every one of Fox hears day in and day out.

    […] Newsom has totally energized progressives by standing up to DeSantis and pantsing him in his own front yard.

  171. says

    The Heritage Foundation is looking for fascism’s new foot soldiers. It might not go well

    We’ve previously reported on The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, an effort to provide a future Republican presidential administration with a pre-built agenda and an army of loyalists who have already been vetted. This would weed out anybody who might have qualms about bending the law in an administration planning mass deportations, a purge of those who are disloyal from government and the military, and the arrest of Donald Trump’s enemies.

    A major part of that effort is assembling that army of loyalists, which is being done through an online pre-vetting process that will allow the next Republican administration to check that each potential administration hire is, in fact, a MAGA-style hard-liner.

    Axios has now followed up on its prior reporting on that effort by obtaining and publishing the loyalty “questionnaire” Donald Trump’s team was subjecting hires to during the waning, ultra-paranoid months of his administration. Their premise is that it might be a hoot to compare that vetting effort to this vetting effort, and you know what? They’re right. It is a hoot.

    You can go look at both versions here to see how the Trump administration’s 2020 loyalty tests and The Heritage Foundation’s “Talent Database” share a lot of similarities. The biggest difference is that the prior Trumpian version expected you to fill out large text boxes containing things like, “What part of Candidate Trump’s campaign message most appealed to you and why?” or, “What political commentator, thinker or politician best reflects your views?”

    The revamped Heritage version has near-identical versions of the same questions, e.g.: “Name one person, past or present, who has most influenced the development of your political philosophy.” But it also tacks on a list of multiple choice questions that you must answer and that present explicit litmus tests for you to pass.

    Do you believe that “The U.N. should have authority over the citizens or public policies of sovereign nations”? Do you believe that “The permanent institutions of family and religion are foundational to American freedom and the common good”?

    Whether you do or you don’t, you’d better at least have the wherewithal to know how The Heritage Foundation’s army of ideological zombies wants you to answer those. It appears that this very long list of questions (“The police in America are systemically racist”) is meant to weed out people who are too stupid to know what the preferred conservative lies are.

    Which, to be fair, is probably The Heritage Foundation’s most important priority. Fascist regimes don’t particularly care what is true and what is false, but you’d better believe they expect you to know, and rigorously, what you’re supposed to think is true or false. Whether you have the rote competence expected of a Burger King manager is not being tested here; the tests are all meant to weed out anyone but the most ideologically obtuse.

    Heritage is looking for people like themselves, conservative loyalists who can keep insisting that Conservatism Is The Way no matter how many real-world disasters they leave in their wake. […] Not even the arch-conservative but jail-averse Bill Barr could pass muster with this crowd now.

    Anyhoo, what’s intriguing about this effort to build a list of fascism’s most loyal future foot soldiers is that the application process is entirely online. You can just go fill it out yourself by going here, and the entry price is that you have to give The Heritage Foundation a valid phone number to send texts to. But there’s nothing that says people can’t lie when applying for jobs in a new Trump administration. Heritage reportedly has at least 4,000 applicants to sort through. They’re aiming for 20,000, but there’s nothing to say that non-Trump supporters can’t fill out their little forms.

    And they can hardly expect that applicants won’t lie when the majority of the form is specifically asking people to lie about things like systemic racism and the utility of school voucher programs. Alternatively, there’s nothing that says you can’t tell the truth!

    Name one person, past or present, who has most influenced the development of your political philosophy.

    The person who most influenced my political philosophy is Richard Scarry. Richard Scarry taught me that even worms can drive cars if the cars are made of apples, and if worms can drive apple cars then why are we passing laws that say you can’t make cars out of apples? That seems bigoted against worms. I have a girlfriend in Canada who is a worm and drives an apple car and she says it works just fine except that they start to smell and you have to buy a new apple car every few days, but it seems like that would stimulate the economy quite a lot.

    Name a book that has most significantly shaped your political philosophy, and please explain its influence on your thinking.

    The book that has most shaped my political philosophy is the Richard Scarry book with the worm driving the apple car, because it made me realize that cars can be fruit and fruit can be cars and it made me think a lot about what our national transportation infrastructure would look like if you had separate lanes for fruit cars and log cars and normal cars. I drew what this would look like and I sent it to my girlfriend and she said it was cool. If you like, I can draw another one and send it to you. If I am in charge of the Department of Transportation I would draw one and make everybody look at it and I would make sure that if you wanted to drive an apple car you could drive an apple car without bureaucrats getting in your way.

    See? Filling out forms like this is easy.

    This is basically not much different from what Larry Kudlow and Ryan Zinke joined the Trump administration to do, after all, except we didn’t even get half-decent drawings of apple cars out of it. Look me in the eye and tell me The Heritage Foundation would be worse off recommending someone who filled out their entire application talking about Richard Scarry. If Ayn Rand’s life philosophies crashed and burned the moment these twits tried to model an Iraqi government after them, maybe Heritage needs to broaden its list of movement-approved ideologues.

  172. birgerjohansson says

    At the nine-minute mark of this episode of Terry Talks Movies, he brings up the documentary Casa Susanna. It is about a 1950s haven for transgender people that existed in the Catskills. As this was a very repressive time, this was one of the few places they could get together with like-minded.
    https://youtu.be/aacH2Dy2GWo

  173. Reginald Selkirk says

    In which a lawyer goes ‘sovereign citizen’

    Vancouver lawyer who sued neighbour over deck divider accused of pseudolegal ‘paper terrorism’

    A Vancouver woman is asking for the courts to make an example of her neighbour, a practising lawyer she alleges has filed a baseless pseudolegal lawsuit against her in an attempt to “provoke a state of fear.”

    Colleen McLelland stood before a B.C. Supreme Court master on Wednesday, asking for a notice of claim filed by real estate lawyer Naomi Arbabi to be struck as “scandalous, frivolous or vexatious.” McLelland also called on the court to refer a complaint against Arbabi to the Law Society of B.C…

    An affidavit of service filed by McLelland says that when a process server knocked on Arbabi’s door to serve her with McLelland’s response to the claim, the woman who answered said she was not Naomi Arbabi.

    The process server writes in the affidavit that she found Arbabi’s photo online, and confirmed it was the person she’d just met, so she emailed Arbabi to ask for an explanation.

    Arbabi responded: “when you ask i if i am Naomi Arbabi the answer is always no as Naomi Arbabi is an incorporated name and does not refer to a living breathing woman.”

    According to the affidavit, Arbabi expanded on her theory in another email later the same day, explaining that Naomi Arbabi was a “dead entity corporation” created by her birth certificate.

    “I, a woman, am not Naomi Arbabi, but Naomi Arbabi is the name i am called. There is a subtle but crucial difference between the two. Unfortunately, this is not common knowledge yet,” she wrote…

  174. Pierce R. Butler says

    Yoga now qualifies as a religion:

    A yoga leader promised followers enlightenment. But he’s now accused of sexual abuse

    <

    blockquote>… Gregorian Bivolaru… The arrest this week in the Paris region of the 71-year-old Romanian yoga guru and 40 others marked the culmination of a six-year manhunt involving Interpol. The raid, led by 175 officers of a French police unit that combats sect-related crime, also freed 26 people, who were described by authorities as sect victims that had been housed in deplorably dirty and cramped conditions. …

    Bivolaru’s group, initially known as MISA (“Mouvement pour l’Intégration Spirituelle vers l’Absolu”) and later as the Atman yoga federation, allegedly engaged in non-consensual sexual activities under the facade of tantra yoga teachings…

    Despite expulsion from international yoga federations and legal scrutiny for prostitution, sexual slavery and human trafficking, the group’s “ashrams” were centers for indoctrination and sexual exploitation disguised as spiritual enlightenment, according to the official. …

    He had obtained political refugee status in Sweden, thereby delaying legal proceedings in Romania. …

  175. Reginald Selkirk says

    Japan Debuts Six-Story Experimental Fusion Reactor

    The biggest experimental nuclear fusion reactor in operation was inaugurated north of Tokyo today, as scientists continue to plug away at making nuclear fusion a viable source of the world’s energy.

    The reactor—JT-60SA—is a tokamak, a doughnut-shaped reactor that can heat plasma to 360 million degrees Fahrenheit (200 million degrees Celsius). The reactor fired up for the first time in October; at the time, researchers affiliated with the project estimated that it will take two years for the reactor to produce the plasmas necessary for experiments, according to the publication Science…

  176. says

    NBC News:

    Israel renewed its assault on the Gaza Strip Friday after the end of a weeklong truce with Hamas, pummeling the Palestinian enclave from the air while warning civilians to leave parts of southern Gaza in a sign that it intends to expand its ground offensive.

    NBC News:

    The White House says it is continuing efforts to renew a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. ‘We continue to work with Israel, Egypt, and Qatar on efforts to extend the humanitarian pause in Gaza,’ a National Security Council spokesperson said this morning. ‘Hamas has so far failed to produce a list of hostages that would enable a further extension of the pause,’ the spokesperson added.

    New York Times:

    Israeli officials obtained Hamas’s battle plan [the so-called “Jericho Wall” document] for the Oct. 7 terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents, emails and interviews show. But Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out.

  177. says

    Miami New Times:

    A Florida Proud Boy who assaulted police and passed around a sledgehammer and pepper spray during the January 6 attack at the U.S Capitol is headed to prison. Zachary Johnson, a 34-year-old Tampa-area Proud Boy nicknamed #GogglesMan on social media, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon to more than three years in prison and another three years of supervised release for his role in the insurrection.

  178. says

    Ukraine Update: Russia is not winning the war, by Mark Sumner

    On Friday, Russian state media reported that dictator Vladimir Putin had ordered the size of the Russian military to increase by 170,000 active members. This is the second time in a year that Putin has increased the size of his military. According to a statement on the Kremlin website, the overall size of the Russian military now stands at 2,209,130 personnel, of which 1,320,000 are active-duty service members.

    According to deputy chair of the Russian Security Council and long-term Putin stooge Dmitry Medvedev, over 452,000 men have enlisted in the Russian army in 2023. That follows 300,000 reservists being called up for active duty in September 2022.

    Before the invasion of Ukraine, there were around 800,000 active service members in the Russian military. Considering the numbers that were already mobilized and those that Medvedev says have been recruited, there should already be over 1.5 million soldiers in the Russian army. That’s not the case, and there is one big reason.

    Putin is enjoying a lot of good publicity at the moment. It’s not “good” in the sense that he’s done something good—in fact, on Thursday Russia declared simply being gay makes someone “an extremist” and ramped up an already steep program of restrictions and persecutions. Instead, Putin is getting a boosts from The Economist in an article titled “Putin seems to be winning the war in Ukraine—for now,” and from an editorial in The Washington Post that declares that the Russian economy has stabilized, public opinion has moved solidly in favor of the war, and Putin’s regime “looks more stable than at any other time in the past two years.”

    Not only that, but European allies are increasingly worried about how the pro-Russian position of Republicans in Congress and distractions caused by the war between Israel and Hamas signal a bleak future for American military support of Ukraine. Delays delivering long-range GLSDB rockets are being read by Ukrainian sources as a decline in American support.

    In short: Putin is expanding the military; the Russian economy is enjoying a burst of activity (in large part because oligarchs are finding it harder to spend their money abroad); Russia has a fresh batch of military supplies from China and North Korea; and as all that’s making hearts warm in Moscow, Ukraine is coming off a largely unsuccessful summer offensive and entering a winter in which it seems support for their cause is declining.

    On top of everything else, earlier this week Putin signed a new budget that greatly expands the Russian military budget. Under this budget, military expenses exceed the cost of everything else in the Russian government. According to one Russia expert, Putin wants the invasion of Ukraine completed so he can be “ready for a military confrontation with the West in perpetuity.”

    It’s completely understandable that Ukrainians, supporters of Ukraine, and even those whose only interest is seeing Russia’s future military ambitions dulled are not feeling like this is the best of all holiday seasons.

    However, there’s a big difference between Putin having temporarily stabilized his position at one end of a very long table, and declaring that the war is lost—or even being lost.

    In May, Russia was offering new contract soldiers a $2,400 sign-on bonus. It’s now paying $7,000. That immediate payment upon sign-up is now over half the median annual salary in Russia, and far more than most men living in rural areas can earn in a year. On top of that, the average wage of a Russian soldier in Ukraine is now reportedly three times the average national salary.

    If the Russian military is seeing a wave of recruits and the public is being more supportive of Putin, it’s because he’s paying them an unprecedented amount to go to Ukraine and be a part of this: [list of Russian losses]

    According to some Telegram reports, Russian men are being driven to the recruiting station by wives or parents eager to pick up that fat check … even if it means they never return.

    There’s a reason why Putin needs all those men and why he’s willing to pay for them. Over the last year of the war, most Russian success has been marked by a single tactic: meat waves. Russia throws out a group of men to be slaughtered. Then throws out another. And another … all in hopes that the wave of bodies will carry them to their objective.

    It worked in Bakhmut, where Wagner Group forces drove tens of thousands of poorly trained prisoner troops in attacks that sometimes resulted in mounds of bodies. It didn’t work at Vuhledar, despite repeated efforts. Russia is trying it again at Avdiivka, where … we’ll get to that.

    Russia is pouring more money into its military, but there’s little sign that money is expanding their ability to manufacture new arms or speed up the supply of equipment. For that, Russia is buying drones from Iran, artillery from North Korea, and counting on China to supply most of the other needs for its army of occupation. It’s paying soldiers to go to the front, using a temporary burst of revenue that is absolutely not guaranteed to last.

    So far there are few signals that this strategy is doing more than allowing Russia to largely hold on to what territory it still occupies in Ukraine. That could change for the better (or worse) at any moment. But right now, the only thing the numbers show is that the invasion of Ukraine is becoming an increasingly costly enterprise for Russia, and even a huge increase in men and money hasn’t given them any significant advances in months.

    For most people, that’s not what winning looks like.
    —————————-
    Russia did manage three very small advances on Friday. [map at the link]

    One of these was in the Bakhmut area, where Russian forces continued an advance from the heights around Dubovo-Vasylivka. The advance in this area was less than one-half of a kilometer. However, Russia has picked up several areas on the north and west of Bakhmut in the last two weeks after months in which Ukraine seemed to be on the offensive. At this point, Russia still doesn’t seem to fully control the village of Khromove, which they reached earlier this week. [map at the link]

    Maybe the most disappointing change was a reversal north of Avdiivka. In the past several days, Ukraine had managed to drive Russian forces from Stepove and from areas west of the rail line. On Thursday, they had even pushed across the rail line and threatened an accumulation of Russian armor and infantry that had gathered north of the big hill of mine waste known as Terrikon. However, on Friday that gathering of Russian forces drove west, reversing the tide of the week, re-crossing the rail lines, and moving into the eastern portion of Stepove. Dammit. [map at the link]

    The third Russian gain was by far the smallest, but also reportedly the most costly. Russia picked up about four square blocks in Marinka on Friday. Ukrainian sources indicate those blocks were responsible for the bulk of those 1,280 men that Russia reportedly lost on Friday.
    ————————————
    Ukraine reportedly made gains north of Novoprovopivka, though those are not yet reflected on Deep State’s map. There seems to be something of a circling motion underway, with Ukrainian forces pressing south in an area roughly 1 kilometer west of Robotyne, and Russian forces trying to move north right beside them. The level of artillery and drone activity from both sides remains high in this area. [map at the link]

    The biggest movement for Ukraine seems to be in an area that hasn’t generated a lot of news in the last two weeks: Staromaiorske and Urozhaine, in the direction of Mariupol. Both these towns have taken a battering from Russian artillery and survived multiple attempts by Russia to retake the area. On Friday, Ukraine reportedly made gains west of Staromaiorske. This movement takes them closer to higher ground. In addition to the area circled, some sources are also indicating that Ukraine has taken the area north of that small river just to the northwest (the area around that red arrow). But this is not yet confirmed.
    ———————————————
    I’m honestly not sure what conclusions to draw from this. Are Russian attacks getting progressively smaller? Are they using a higher ratio of infantry to armor? [Chart showing vehicle losses for November]

    It could also be that Ukraine is running low on the artillery and drones needed to stop Russian advances, but Russia doesn’t seem to have made the kind of gains that would indicate such a change in the balance.
    ———————————-
    A heartwarming tale for the holidays: [Tweet at the link: “☠️ 2 nice girls brought vodka and food to a Russian military base checkpoint in Simferopol, occupied Crimea to thank the soldiers. 24 Russian soldiers died and 11 more hospitalized. The gifts were laced with heavy doses of arsenic. The girls disappeared without a trace.”]

  179. says

    Police raid Moscow gay bars after a Supreme Court ruling labeled LGBTQ+ movement ‘extremist’

    Russian security forces raided gay clubs and bars across Moscow Friday night, less than 48 hours after the country’s top court banned what it called the “global LGBTQ+ movement” as an extremist organization.

    Police searched venues across the Russian capital, including a nightclub, a male sauna, and a bar that hosted LGBTQ+ parties, under the pretext of a drug raid, local media reported.

    Eyewitnesses told journalists that clubgoers’ documents were checked and photographed by the security services. They also said that managers had been able to warn patrons before police arrived.

    The raids follow a decision by Russia’s Supreme Court to label the country’s LGBTQ+ “movement” as an extremist organization.

    The ruling, which was made in response to a lawsuit filed by the Justice Ministry, is the latest step in a decadelong crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights under President Vladimir Putin, who has emphasized “traditional family values” during his 24 years in power.

    Activists have noted the lawsuit was lodged against a movement that is not an official entity, and that under its broad and vague definition authorities could crack down on any individuals or groups deemed to be part of it.

    Several LGBTQ+ venues have already closed following the decision, including St. Petersburg’s gay club Central Station. It wrote on social media Friday that the owner would no longer allow the bar to operate with the law in effect.

    Max Olenichev, a human rights lawyer who works with the Russian LGBTQ+ community, told The Associated Press before the ruling that it effectively bans organized activity to defend the rights of LGBTQ+ people.

    […] Before the ruling, leading Russian human rights groups had filed a document with the Supreme Court that called the Justice Ministry lawsuit discriminatory and a violation of Russia’s constitution. Some LGBTQ+ activists tried to become a party in the case but were rebuffed by the court.

    In 2013, the Kremlin adopted the first legislation restricting LGBTQ+ rights, known as the “gay propaganda” law, banning any public endorsement of “nontraditional sexual relations” among minors. In 2020, constitutional reforms pushed through by Putin to extend his rule by two more terms also included a provision to outlaw same-sex marriage.

    After sending troops into Ukraine in 2022, the Kremlin ramped up a campaign against what it called the West’s “degrading” influence. Rights advocates saw it as an attempt to legitimize the war. That same year, a law was passed banning propaganda of “nontraditional sexual relations” among adults, also, effectively outlawing any public endorsement of LGBTQ+ people.

    Another law passed this year prohibited gender transitioning procedures and gender-affirming care for transgender people. The legislation prohibited any “medical interventions aimed at changing the sex of a person,” as well as changing one’s gender in official documents and public records.

    […] Many people will consider leaving Russia before they become targeted, said Olga Baranova, director of the Moscow Community Center for LGBTQ+ Initiatives.

    “It is clear for us that they’re once again making us out as a domestic enemy to shift the focus from all the other problems that are in abundance in Russia,” Baranova told the AP.

  180. says

    MAGA mucho mad at the 105 Republicans who ousted George Santos! YIKES!

    […] Below are a few delicious MAGA screenshots post-expulsion, warning, your WTF-odometer might break:

    First up is from leading GOP pundit, Catturd—you read that right—his name is Catturd (SMDH):

    No matter what they did, the Democrat party would never expel one of their own.

    *cough, cough* “Al Franken…” *cough, cough* and really—is that the metric?: the other guys would protect their criminals, so we need to protect ours? Sigh.

    [Tweet from Charlie Kirk claiming that Mayorkas is worse than Santos] I am surprised Kirk’s nose doesn’t stretch from here to Canada from all the lies and misdirections in this post. Santos isn’t being expelled for having an Only Fans page and Botox injections—he is being removed for defrauding folks to the tune of millions!

    Oh, and about that other claim: the Only Fans page and Botox are purported to be paid for with campaign funds.

    Charlie wouldn’t know the truth if it spat on his head.

    [Tweet from Rep. Dan Bishop] So, he doesn’t think even a Republican colleague’s mama should be safe from being victimized by Santos? The poor woman spent tens of thousands to rectify a situation caused when the criminal used her card without permission.

    Law and order party ladies and gents *slowclap*.

    Plenty more MAGA idiots’ hot takes where that came from […]

    Democrats have become the actual law and order party that will back the blue and hold lawbreakers accountable.

    An aside—some Democrats have taken to social media to point and laugh with well-earned relief that at least one Republican criminal has been dished a heaping helping of their just desserts. Hilarious! [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/why-rip-george-santos-is-now-trending-on-social-media/ar-AA1kQP9j ]

    […] Look, one can acknowledge we all make mistakes while expecting individuals to atone for them—even the bible calls on sinners to repent. Did Santos? Not so much.

    He went out the door, pointing fingers at others and claiming to be a victim.

    All I can say regarding the latest in Republican snafu is this: The next time one of these ass hats tries to pull an Al Franken-style expulsion on Dems, point to Trump or Santos and exclaim, “Who among us is without sin!”

    Vote blue.

    The Daily Show:

    This is the worst day for George Santos since his mom fake-died in 9/11

  181. says

    In October, President Joe Biden announced a new campaign to crack down on junk fees, potentially saving American consumers billions of dollars. He announced new efforts to target the surprise fees that companies sneak onto consumer bills, such as banking overdraft fees, excessive credit card late fees, service charges for purchasing concert tickets, and hidden hotel-booking fees.

    And coincidentally, as The Daily Beast points out, “it just so happens that Biden’s likely opponent, former President Donald Trump, has raked in a small fortune” on hidden hotel booking fees.

    The Daily Beast, in an article by Jake Lahut, wrote:

    At least three of Trump’s hotel properties bill guests for a “resort fee,” a sneaky and pricey charge that covers an array of unspecified amenities, and typically only appears at the end of the online reservation process.

    The October announcement by the Biden-Harris administration said the Federal Trade Commission is proposing a rule that, if finalized, would ban businesses from charging hidden and misleading fees and require them to show the full price up front. Under the proposed rule, companies that fail to comply could face monetary penalties and have to provide refunds to consumers.

    Biden, speaking from the White House Rose Garden after the announcement of the new anti-junk fee campaign on Oct. 11, began his remarks by noting that it’s an issue of “simple fairness … folks are tired of being taken advantage of and being played for suckers.”

    He added:

    Research shows that without — without realizing it, folks can end up paying as much as 20 percent more because of hidden junk fees than they would have paid if they could see the full price upfront and compare it with other options.

    It’s wrong. It’s wrong. It’s just taking advantage of people. And it makes it harder for honest businesses who are trying to do the right thing to compete with dishonest companies who trick customers into thinking their prices are lower when they, in fact, are not.

    And as Conde Nast Traveler pointed out, the proposed FTC rule would “ban one of the most frustrating aspects of hotel stays: being charged misleading resort fees at checkout.”

    Here’s how Conde Nast Traveler described resort fees:

    Resort fees, sometimes also called “destination” or “amenity” fees, are some of the most notorious hidden charges in the travel industry. They’re mandatory fees charged on a per-room, per-night basis that suddenly show up on a hotel guest’s final bill, resulting in an unpleasant surprise for many vacationers at checkout. Hotels say the charges cover a broad range of services provided to guests, such as access to a resort’s gym, free Wi-Fi, local phone calls, and sometimes complimentary equipment rentals like snorkel gear at beachfront properties.

    Depending on the length of a vacation and the type of resort, the fees can add hundreds of dollars to a traveler’s tab. The average resort fee is $42.41 per night, according to a recent study from NerdWallet, but on the higher end of the spectrum, they can reach $90 per night or more. The charges are lucrative for the hotel industry, which makes nearly $3 billion a year off of them, according to a 2018 study by lodging industry researcher Bjorn Hanson.

    The Daily Beast story detailed the resort fees charged at three Trump properties:

    The Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas, for instance, was built on a three-acre parking lot and doesn’t have the sprawling features and amenities of a typical resort there. But it charges a one-time resort fee of $132—nearly as much as the $159 rate for one night in a king room at the hotel in January.

    Meanwhile, a room with an ocean view at the Trump International Hotel on Waikiki Beach in Hawaii might be listed for as low as $499 per night. But with a daily resort fee of $125, the total cost of a three night stay balloons closer to $2,000, once the $375 in resort fees and local taxes kick in.

    Trump’s golf resort property in Doral, Florida, also charges a one-time $135 resort fee, a healthy chunk of the $319 nightly rate for a king room there.

    The Daily Beast noted that Biden’s focus on pesky junk fees could open a path for the president to simultaneously turn Trump’s business practices into a political liability while burnishing the president’s own record in reducing costs for American consumers.

    Biden campaign spokesman T.J. Ducklo told The Daily Beast:

    “Joe Biden working to eliminate the sky-high junk fees Donald Trump greedily charges guests at his failing hotels perfectly encapsulates the difference in their values. It’s Scranton vs Park Ave., middle class vs. the billionaire class and it’s why voters can’t trust Trump in the White House to fight for them.”

    […] “Bidenomics needs explaining; junk fees don’t,” […]

    The bipartisan lesson from Hogan [former Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland] and Whitmer [Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan] is that voters remember and reward politicians who saved them a direct household expense more than any argument based on macro-level economic indicators. Voters care about the economy in front of them.

    […] In August 2023, a consumer group named Travelers United filed a class action complaint against Hyatt Corp., alleging the hotel chain has been cheating guests out of millions of dollars by falsely advertising its room rates and charging hidden fees at check out.

    There are also two separate bills that have been introduced in the Senate that would ban resort fees, including the bipartisan Hotel Fees Transparency Act, proposed by Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Republican Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, that would require hotels and short-term rentals to display the full price, including fees, up front.

    As Washington Post opinion columnist Caroline Rampell wrote in October after Biden’s announcement:

    In the grand scheme of things, resort fees and the like might seem like a minor issue. But they matter to consumers, they distort markets and they’re an easy thing for policymakers to remedy. This is good government at its most boring, pedestrian best.

    Link

  182. says

    […]

    EV Sales Kicking More Ass Than Ever

    The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported this week that combined sales of new battery-electric vehicles (BEVs), hybrids, and plug-in hybrids reached a record-setting 17.7 percent of all light-duty vehicle sales in the third quarter. For the year so far, that puts sales of those three types at 16 percent of all vehicles, compared to 12.5 percent in 2022 and just nine percent in 2021. Here, have a chart, which shows the corresponding dip in sales of new internal-combustion cars and light trucks: [charts at the link]

    We oughta start a betting pool on when those two lines will cross, and more than 50 percent of vehicles sold will be EVs or hybrids. I’ll put my marker on 2027, but it’d be neat if it came sooner. As EV charging infrastructure ramps up in the next few years, expect the portion of hybrids and plug-in hybrids to start declining, too.

    When Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm posted about the report on Xitter Tuesday, all the MAGA Chuds with blue checkmarks told her she had to be lying, because Fox News says EVs are unworkable and nobody wants them, you liar. We’ll assume they also consider “confirmation bias” a dirty liberal lie.

    On top of that, the EIA reports that, as you’d expect with any new technology, luxury battery-electric vehicles remain the biggest market segment, but that EV prices overall went down during the third quarter, dropping by five percent to an average of “$50,283, bringing the price 24% lower than at the price peak in the second quarter of 2022.”

    On average, BEV prices are within about $3,000 of comparable internal-combustion models, which means that models that qualify for the full $7,5000 tax credit for EVs are actually cheaper, even before you start saving money on never gassing up again.

    But also, keep in mind that the most expensive EVs and the richest buyers don’t even qualify for the tax credits, so no, it’s not a subsidy for the rich.

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/hey-lets-round-out-the-week-with

  183. says

    Good news:

    […]

    The Climate Bill’s Good For Working-Class America

    A new report from the Treasury Department finds that the Inflation Reduction Act is “driving clean energy investment to communities that have been underserved and at the forefront of fossil fuel production” — exactly as it was designed to do.

    A few takeaway stats, handily compiled on Xitter by Heather Boushey, a member of President Biden’s Council of Economic Advisers: in the year and some months since the IRA passed,

    – 81% of announced clean investments have been for projects in counties with below-average weekly wages

    – 86% of clean investments are in counties with below-average college graduation rates

    – 70% of clean investments are in counties where a smaller share of the population is employed

    – 78% of clean investments are in counties with below-average median household incomes

    – The share of clean investments going to low-income counties rose from 68% to 78%

    The energy transition is happening, kids. And it’s going to be good for almost all of us not named ExxonMobil.

    Same link as in comment 246. Scroll down to view.

  184. says

    What weirdo theocratic Christofascist gay-hating conspiracy-addled porn-dodging phony-impeachment-pitching lunacy has Speaker of the House Mike Johnson signed his name to today?

    We’re glad you asked!

    CNN dug up a 2022 book called The Revivalist Manifesto penned by a Louisiana political blogger and generic-faced Republican whose next picture you see will probably be a booking photo after a child porn arrest by the name of Scott McKay. And hoo boy does it sound like a banger:

    “The Revivalist Manifesto” gives credence to unfounded conspiracy theories often embraced by the far-right – including the “Pizzagate” hoax, which falsely claimed top Democratic officials were involved in a pedophile ring, among other conspiracies.

    The book also propagates baseless and inaccurate claims, implying that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was subjected to blackmail and connected to the disgraced underage sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

    The book also reportedly defends Joe Rogan for using the n-word and sneers at poor people on welfare, so McKay is really playing the entire gamut of conservative hits from the last half-century or so.

    Johnson’s foreword actually feels fairly generic as far as forewords go at first, but because its baseline subject is a mountain of insanity pressed between two cardboard covers, it quickly devolves into something that could have been written by Pat Robertson in the depths of an ether binge:

    As McKay says, we must become a counter-revolutionary movement against the Left and its “Progressive Democrats,” communists, deep state operatives, and cultural and institutional arsonists who are advancing their scorched-earth policy through our republic.

    Oh sure, the congressman who supported Donald Trump’s coup attempt on January 6 that resulted in the sacking of the nation’s Capitol simply because millions […] believed a whole bunch of evidence-free horseshit about voter fraud is worried about the opposing party taking a gas can and a book of matches to our republic’s institutions. That fits.

    Anyway, what crap is Johnson, who we remind you is second in line to the presidency at the moment, signaling his apparent approval of? Well, we mentioned Pizzagate:

    McKay insinuates that hacked emails from Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman John Podesta contained coded references hinting involvement in “child sex trafficking” because of “unexplained references” to “hot dogs and pizza,” resembling alleged code words used by pedophiles.

    “The Pizzagate scandal was born, and though some of the most outlandish allegations made in it were clearly disproven, other elements were not; the whole thing just seemed to be dismissed as debunked, and no explanation was ever given,” he writes.

    There is some Seth Rich trutherism, which even Fox News has been forced under penalty of lawsuit to recant. There is some Great Replacement yammer that “the Biden administration deliberately allowed undocumented immigrants into the country to turn them into voters.” There is some gay bashing of Pete Buttigieg, who is referred to as being “obnoxiously gay,” […]

    The book targets and taunts prominent Democratic officials, including calling Interior Secretary Deb Haaland “half oppressed” because her mother is Native American and father is of Norwegian descent and writes that former President Barack Obama’s “chief selling point was that he was black.”

    All class.

    Now, one could, if one felt generous, chalk up writing this foreword to an ambitious Louisiana politician taking on an unpleasant task to shore up his support from the lunatic right. We are not feeling generous, however, so we will note that, according to CNN, Johnson hasn’t exactly tried to distance himself from this distasteful fuckery:

    Johnson’s endorsement of the book extends beyond the foreword: In 2022, he actively promoted the book on his public social media platforms and even dedicated an episode of his podcast he co-hosts with his wife to hosting McKay.

    During the podcast episode, Johnson expressed his belief in the book, stating, “I obviously believe in the product, or I wouldn’t have written the foreword. So I endorse the work.” He also referred to McKay as a “dear friend” and highlighted that the book “really could make some waves.”

    Well, after 18 months on the market, the book is #79,914 on Amazon’s best-seller list as of this writing, so those are some pretty anemic waves.

    McKay has also written and apparently self-published a series of fantasy novels in which a tribe of savages with “no moral compass…or principles of private property ownership” [JFC! LOL!] attempt to take over a peaceful nation of civilized people. Oh boy, we wonder where he got the inspiration for that not-at-all-obvious metaphor!

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/mike-johnson-endorses-book-full-of

  185. says

    I don’t trust Netanyahu.

    Netanyahu pulls negotiators from Qatar claiming talks hit ‘dead end’

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pulled his country’s negotiators from Qatar, calling off hostage negotiation talks saying they had reached an “impasse” with Hamas.

    Negotiations previously resulted in a weeklong cease-fire that freed over 100 Hamas-held hostages and 240 Palestinian prisoners. Fighting resumed in the conflict on Friday, but the Biden administration, Arab allies and some factions of the Israeli government pushed for a longer pause to continue hostage releases.

    “Hamas did not fulfil its part of the agreement, which included the release of all children and women according to a list that was forwarded to Hamas and approved by it,” the Israeli prime minster’s office said in a statement.

    Secretary of State Antony Blinken was in Israel on Thursday and Friday, his third trip to the region since the start of the conflict in October.

    He blamed Hamas for the cease-fire deal falling through, but also reiterated the need for the Israeli military to better consider Gaza civilians.

    “The way Israel defends itself matters,” he said Thursday. “It’s imperative that Israel act in accordance with international humanitarian law and the laws of war, even when confronting a terrorist group that respects neither.”

    […] “This is going to be very important going forward. It’s something we’re going to be looking at very closely.” […]

    As fighting ramped up again Saturday, the Israeli military said it struck 400 targets in Gaza, including 50 in southern Gaza, where an estimated 2 million civilians shelter from the conflict. […]

  186. says

    Three US cities make list of most expensive in world

    New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco are three of the most expensive cities on the planet to live in, according to a new report.

    New York tied with Geneva as the third most expensive city on earth in this year’s Economist Intelligence Unit’s Worldwide Cost of Living report.

    Last year, the Big Apple tied with Singapore for the top spot on the ranking.

    […] Zurich bumped New York from its top rank this year, in part because of the strength of the Swiss franc and the high prices of groceries, household goods […]. The Big Apple is now tied for third in the world.

    Los Angeles and San Francisco, meanwhile, came in as the sixth and tenth most expensive cities on the list.

    The survey was conducted between August 14 and September of 2023 and used data from 173 major cities. […]

    The report found that on average, prices for over 200 commonly used goods and services rose by 7.4 percent over the past year.

    That number is slightly lower than last year — when prices rose by an average of 8.1 percent — but still well above trends seen between 2017 and 2021
    .
    A decline in supply-chain issues stemming, in part, from China lifting its COVID-19 restrictions late last year have helped drive down some prices, according to the report.

    On top of that, the spike in energy prices seen after Russia invaded Ukraine have also eased causing energy prices to slightly decrease, the report added.

    Here’s the complete list of the world’s top 10 most expensive cities:
    Singapore, Singapore (tied for 1st)
    Zurich, Switzerland (tied for 1st)
    Geneva, Switzerland (tied for 3rd)
    New York, U.S. (tied for 3rd)
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Los Angeles, U.S.
    Paris, France
    Copenhagen, Denmark (tied for 8th)
    Tel Aviv, Israel (tied for 8th)
    San Francisco, U.S.

  187. says

    NOT REAL NEWS: A look at what didn’t happen this week

    A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even though they were shared widely on social media. The Associated Press checked them out. Here are the facts:

    CLAIM: An expert who debunked the “pizzagate” conspiracy theory has been jailed for possessing child sexual abuse images.

    THE FACTS: A former ABC reporter referenced in a meme circulating online was recently sentenced to federal prison for such crimes, but he never investigated “pizzagate.” The long-dormant conspiracy theory – which posited that Democratic Party insiders harbored child sex slaves in a Washington, D.C. pizza parlor — has been revived online in recent days, boosted by prominent social media users including Elon Musk. […] the false connection stems from an image of a fabricated New York Post headline that spread online in recent months. “Award winning ABC journalist who ‘debunked’ pizzagate, pleads guilty in horrific child porn case,” the headline reads over an image of Meek. […] Meek never published an investigation on “pizzagate” while employed at ABC. A 2017 story he co-wrote about Russian propaganda during the war in Syria only briefly mentions the conspiracy theory. Instead, numerous news outlets at the time, including CNN and The New York Times, debunked the rumor. Meek, who covered national security issues until his resignation last year, was sentenced to six years in federal prison after pleading guilty to possessing child sexual abuse images.— Associated Press writer Philip Marcelo in New York contributed this report.

    ___

    Trump misleadingly cites ‘duplicate’ ballots in disputed Georgia county as proof of election fraud

    CLAIM: A recent court filing revealed that 3,600 “duplicate” ballots were cast for Biden and illegally counted in Fulton County, Georgia, during the 2020 election.

    THE FACTS: A state review of the county’s audit of the 2020 presidential race found errors and inconsistencies in the vote count, including some double counting of ballots, but the errors weren’t deemed criminal and they weren’t enough to alter the election results. Nevertheless, former President Donald Trump is continuing to cast doubt on the legal filing in Georgia’s Fulton County […] “Fulton County, Georgia, acknowledges, in a major Consent Decree, that 3,600 individual ballots were DUPLICATED,” the Republican wrote in a post on his social media platform Truth Social. “THAT’S A LOT OF CRIME. When are the rest of the facts coming out? We are all waiting. This is just the beginning. UNBELIEVABLE!” In a video that spread widely on other platforms, Trump made similar remarks and called it “massive voter corruption.” Trump’s posts refer to a June consent order that found Fulton County election workers “misidentified and duplicated” voting results during the state-mandated audit of the 2020 election, which was a hand recount of the presidential race results. “There was, in fact, no crime,” Jessica Corbitt, a spokesperson for the Fulton County Board of Elections, responded in an email this week. “The consent order addresses procedural issues but there were no accusations or admissions of criminal activity.” The order identified 36 inconsistencies in batch tally sheets for the audit, but found they were due to “human error” and not “intentional misconduct.” [36 is NOT 3,600] It also found they did not affect the final election results as they represented a “fractional number” of the votes cast. […]

    Charles Bullock, a political science professor at the University of Georgia, noted Georgia’s election results were tallied three times in 2020: the initial Election Day count, the hand-counted audit and a final recount by voting machine requested by Trump’s campaign. All three times, Biden prevailed. “It’s misleading to claim this is fraud,” Bullock said by phone. […]
    — Philip Marcelo.
    ___

    Video of West Bank fighting does not show a Doctors Without Borders medic giving a man a rifle

    CLAIM: A video shows a Doctors Without Borders medic in the West Bank city of Jenin take an assault rifle from a man lying on the ground and hand it to a man nearby who begins shooting.

    THE FACTS: The man identified as a medic in the video does not belong to Doctors Without Borders, which works only in hospitals in that area, a spokesperson for the organization told The Associated Press. He is wearing an orange vest with the letters “PMRS” below a yellow circle that matches those worn by members of the Palestinian Medical Relief Society. In the video, the man runs to a person lying facedown on a city street as people shout and gunfire is heard around them. He takes a rifle from the person, runs a few feet and hands it to another man who begins firing as the man in the orange vest takes cover. […] Doctors Without Borders does not work in areas of Jenin where the video spreading online was filmed […] the misrepresented video “incites violence and poses a severe threat not only against MSF staff but all humanitarian workers in the region.” […]

  188. Reginald Selkirk says

    Pro-Trump attorney who helped orchestrate fake electors plot cooperating in Nevada criminal probe

    A Nevada state-level criminal investigation into the fake electors plot intended to overturn Joe Biden’s 2020 election win is ramping up with prosecutors securing the cooperation of a key witness, even as some of those who served as pro-Trump electors remain politically active ahead of the 2024 election.

    Kenneth Chesebro, a lawyer who helped orchestrate the fake electors plot across multiple states, has agreed to sit down with Nevada investigators in hopes of avoiding prosecution there, sources familiar with the matter told CNN…

  189. says

    […] Rep. Liz Cheney has been forced to watch in horror as one Republican after another genuflects before the clammy sack of nougat who’s nudged our democracy to the brink.

    Cheney, vice chair of the House Jan. 6 committee that recommended criminal charges be brought against (alleged!) criminal Donald Trump, recently joined John Dickerson of “CBS News Sunday Morning” for an interview scheduled to run this weekend. She’s promoting her book “Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning” while also sounding alarm bells over just how close we are to losing the country we all grew up with.

    CBS has made an excerpt of the interview available […]

    DICKERSON: You say Donald Trump, if he is reelected, it will be the end of the republic. What do you mean?

    CHENEY: He’s told us what he will do. It’s very easy to see the steps that he will take. People who say, ‘Well, if he’s elected, it’s not that dangerous because we have all of these checks and balances’ don’t fully understand the extent to which the Republicans in Congress today have been co-opted. One of the things that we see happening today is a sort of a sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States.

    Of course, this has been obvious for some time, but someone on the right had to say it out loud, and that someone appears to be Liz Cheney. […]

    In the upcoming interview, Cheney also touches on a major theme of her book: Republicans in Congress are far too cowardly and cowed by Trump to uphold sacred American values and the rule of law. And she reserves particular scorn for current House Speaker Mike Johnson:

    CHENEY: If you look at what Donald Trump is trying to do, he can’t do it by himself. He has to have collaborators. And the story of Mike Johnson is a story of, of a collaborator and of someone who knew then—and knows now—that what he’s doing and saying is wrong, but he’s willing to do it in an effort to please Donald Trump. And that’s what makes it dangerous.

    DICKERSON: The speaker of the House is a collaborator to overthrow the last election?

    CHENEY: Absolutely.

    […] Needless to say, Cheney isn’t the only one sounding the alarm. On Thursday, Washington Post Editor at Large Robert Kagan published a chilling editorial titled, “A Trump dictatorship is increasingly inevitable. We should stop pretending.” And while it’s easy to quibble over just how “inevitable” Trump’s return is […] nothing in the piece could be considered outlandish or overly alarmist. And Kagan—no doubt correctly—notes that, once Trump secures the GOP nomination, the vast majority of Republicans will dutifully fall in line behind the feral former POTUS, who no longer makes any attempt to conceal his plans for transforming the world’s preeminent democracy into a fascist Cracker Barrel.

    The magical-thinking phase is ending. Barring some miracle, Trump will soon be the presumptive Republican nominee for president. […] Donors who find Trump distasteful have been free to spread their money around to help his competitors. Establishment Republicans have made no secret of their hope that Trump will be convicted and thus removed from the equation without their having to take a stand against him.

    All this will end once Trump wins Super Tuesday. Votes are the currency of power in our system, and money follows, and by those measures, Trump is about to become far more powerful than he already is. The hour of casting about for alternatives is closing. The next phase is about people falling into line.

    […] The recent decision by the Koch political network to endorse GOP hopeful Nikki Haley is scarcely sufficient to change this trajectory. […]

    That’s scary stuff, but as Cheney, et al., point out, it’s not just a frightening prospect—in many ways, it’s already happening. And one of America’s two major political parties appears to be all in.

    So in this case, Cheney—the enemy of our enemy—is not just our friend but potentially a key ally in saving American democracy. […]

    Link

  190. says

    […] Kirk Cameron, who is the worst, wants to replace the Scholastic Book Fair with the Kirk Cameron Book Fair. Oh … joy.

    OK, so it’s not actually the Kirk Cameron Book Fair, but it might as well be. It’s the SkyTree Book Fair, organized by Brave Books, which publishes terrible right-wing Christian books for children. The company features such titles as …

    Elephants Are Not Birds, by Ashley St. Clair, a woman who was kicked out of Turning Point USA for palling around with white supremacists like Nick Fuentes

    The Island of Free Ice Cream, by Jack Posobiec, noted Pizzagate idiot (The book is about evil wolves offering free ice cream and the moral of the story is that capitalism is good)

    Paws Off My Cannon, by former NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch.

    The Night the Snow Monster Attacked, by General Michael Flynn

    Freedom Day the Asher Way, by Dinesh and Debbie D’Souza

    The Parrots Go Bananas, by Sean Spicer

    And, of course, multiple books by Kirk Cameron himself.

    Why is he doing this? Because Scholastic has some books about LGBTQ+ kids and issues that absolutely no one is required to buy.

    “They’re a billion-dollar company, around for over 100 years,” Cameron told the Moonie Times. “They have over 100,000 book fairs around the country, hundreds every single day in public and private schools, and the books are increasingly laced with gender-confusing, race-infused, pornographic, sexually explicit material that you can’t even advertise on Facebook.”

    This is all very ridiculous, but more importantly … what the hell is “race-infused?” What does that even mean? […] Does it just mean, like, mentioning that Black people exist? Or that racism exists? Is it like homeopathy?

    Now, it would be one thing if these people wanted to hold book fairs at private Christian schools — but they’re aiming for public schools. In fact, they are holding their first book fair at a public school today, in Fredericksburg, Virginia, featuring Kirk Cameron himself. That will surely be very exciting for kids born years after Growing Pains was last in syndication. […]

    Now, if you think this isn’t stupid enough, allow me to introduce you to Lanah Burkhardt, a 20-year-old woman who blames her “porn addiction” on, I shit you not, having seen “a single kiss” in a Scholastic book, at the age of 11.

    Lanah also just so happens to be the public relations coordinator at Brave Books. So weird! [video at the link]

    She explains:

    My story started when I was 11 and was introduced to a single kiss in a scholastic book. I didn’t understand why I liked it.

    This was the start of my porn addiction journey.

    I was then very curious and began exploring and it only got worse. I looked for other books that gave me pleasure and it led to internet searches that I will never forget. I was addicted, every night and it was something I immediately regretted and eventually became depressed about. When I was 13 years old, I told my mom I wanted to die.

    I HAVE SO MANY QUESTIONS.

    OK, so we are meant to believe that this was the literal first time this girl ever saw a kiss? Like, in eleven years she never saw a Disney movie? Never saw any movie, period?

    Judd Legum and Rebecca Crosby at Popular Information reported that “Burkhardt cited her story as a reason to restrict access to Drama, a novel published by Scholastic.”

    This is the naughty kissing scene in question. This. [Illustration at the link]

    Further on in Burkhardt’s speech, which was shared to social media by Sky Tree Book Fairs, she said she also wanted Scholastic Book Fairs abolished from all schools, forever, so that no other 11-year-old child ever accidentally sees a cartoon of people kissing again. Or reads such obvious pornography as “Boy-crazy Stacey!,” book #8 of that tawdry Babysitters’ Club series sold by Scholastic.

    Ironically, this actually seems more like an argument against preventing your child from ever seeing people kiss in a cartoon or in a book. Like, if you don’t so much as let your kid watch an anthropomorphic crab sing a song to a mermaid about how she needs to kiss the prince before the evil witch turns her into seafoam, then maybe they do, at the age of 11, see a drawing of people kissing and go bananas.

    Hell, I saw my first naked man’s ass when I was 8 because my mom rented Yentl for me to watch while I was sick (this is normal, shut up) and the only effect that had on me has been my lifelong crush on Mandy Patinkin (also normal, there are others).

    In conclusion, the children should read books and watch all the Barbra Streisand movies and Christian book companies should not be allowed to do book fairs at public schools […]

  191. StevoR says

    Bing Crosby, Shirley Temple, Hitler and Stalin lived in the Australian outback. Their names hark back to a dark chapter in Australia’s past. ..(sip).. Many — like Bing — were named by the white pastoralists who ran these stations. Bing’s mother was named Shirley Temple. She was a beautiful woman, locals say, who had soft, shiny, curly hair. But some men were given the names of the worst mass-murderers in human history — names like Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini.

    Other First Nations people were named after objects or animals, such as Flourbag, Mosquito, Billycan, Helicopter and Frypan. The names have been carried through life by people in remote pockets of northern and central Australia — relics of a time not that long ago when Aboriginal people were denied basic rights, including the right to name their own child. ..(snip)..“The pastoralists just gave out these names, like Potato or Shovel or whatever popped into their head,” Annette reflects. “It was very disrespectful – like a joke.”

    –(Snip!)..

    ..Stalin came in from the desert as a young boy. It’s believed he arrived at Old Cherrabun station in the 1930s. His name was Watikarra. But not for long. “When he came up here to the station, the manager gave him the name Stalin,” Brian says. “I don’t think he understood. He’d never been to school and it was hard for people to understand what the white men were saying back then.” Later in life, Stalin was able to add ‘Watikarra’ as his surname — a compromise of sorts. But among the family there was a gradual realisation of the name’s origin — their father had been named after a murderous dictator from the other side of the world.

    …(Snip)..The naming practices are unsurprising in the context of the time. In Western Australia, Aboriginal people had been stripped of basic rights and freedoms. Draconian laws were in place making every Aboriginal child a ward of the state; police were enforcing segregation in cities and towns; and people working on cattle stations could be arrested for leaving the property they were assigned to. Further fueling tensions was a policy of paying police a cash bonus for every Aboriginal person in their custody, which incentivised the arresting of people who defied the new regime.

    ..(snip).. While many people came to embrace their ‘whitefella’ names, the practice raises questions about the use of slavery in Australia. As Annette Kogolo puts it: you don’t name something unless you feel like you own it. “I think it’s similar to the slave plantation time in America,” she reflects. “It’s similar, how people were treated. Not many stories were captured, but they were told, and passed on, and kept.”

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-03/first-nations-people-given-names-like-bing-crosby-and-stalin/103140862

  192. StevoR says

    So I watched this tonight if folks here can see it :

    https://www.sbs.com.au/ondemand/tv-series/spains-secret-conquest

    Spain’s Secret* Conquest on SBS TV Oz.

    Fascinating history doco on Spain’s colony & the Seminoles incl. black runaway slave rebels La Florirda which was fascinating, informatiove and at time s brutal and tragic too. Well worth watching in my view. Typing as an Auissie with pretty minimal self-taugt and picked up via popukar culture ideas of US of A-ite history.

    (Seen this Marcus Ranum? Thoughts on it?)

    .* Okay, “Secret” probly not-so-much but still.

  193. Reginald Selkirk says

    American Fiction director says white audiences are too comfortable with black clichés

    American Fiction isn’t your average piece of cinema entertainment.

    Sharp and incisive, it’s a satire that aims savage barbs at modern culture.

    It’s the story of an author, Monk, played by Jeffrey Wright, who becomes disillusioned with the way the publishers he wants to work with only seem interested in stereotypical black storytelling.

    In frustration, he pens a book overflowing with black clichés. To his dismay, it becomes an instant literary hit…

  194. says

    The allegations reported this week about Florida Republican Party Chairman Christian Ziegler and his wife, “Moms for Liberty” co-founder Bridget Ziegler, are salacious enough to sufficiently occupy the press for weeks. A three-way relationship involving a couple of the so-called morality police of the GOP goes badly south, ending up in a rape allegation against Christian Ziegler: OK, that’s bad. Real bad.

    And as reported by Lori Rozsa and Will Oremus, writing Saturday for The Washington Post, it gets even worse.

    On Oct. 2, the woman had agreed to have a sexual encounter with Ziegler that was to include his wife, Bridget, the affidavit says. But when the woman learned that Bridget couldn’t make it, she changed her mind and canceled. When Ziegler told her in one message that his wife was no longer available, she replied, “Sorry I was mostly in for her,” she said in a message, according to the affidavit.

    According to the affidavit, the woman told Sarasota police that Ziegler then showed up at her apartment uninvited and raped her. The woman reported the alleged assault to police two days later, and a rape kit was done at a Sarasota hospital, the affidavit states.

    So, according to the affidavit, the entire underpinning of “Mom’s for Liberty” — the self-appointed moral scolds accusing school boards nationwide of allowing the “sexualization” of children via books about gender and sexual orientation (for allegedly “promoting” bisexuality, among other things) — is probably disgraced for good, as it should have been long ago.

    Got it.

    But I’m also really interested in the reaction of the rest of Florida’s Republican Party.

    As Rozsa and Oremus report:

    “It’s certainly deeply, deeply troubling,” said state Rep. Spencer Roach, a member of the Florida GOP executive committee. “I would describe this as just an absolute body blow to the Republican Party. Everyone that I’ve talked to about this is in an absolute tailspin.” [***]

    “They have held themselves out to be paragons of the Christian conservative family values, a prototype,” Roach said. “And I think there’s a very heavy sense of betrayal, certainly within the Republican Party.”

    OK Republicans, help me understand here. Your party’s leader, Donald Trump, is a man who has been judicially adjudged as committing the rape of E. Jean Carroll. That’s not an allegation, it’s a judicial determination. He’s also been accused by 26 women of sexual assault, harassment and battery as well.

    How is this qualitatively — or “morally,” if you prefer — any different than what Ziegler has allegedly done? Do your fellow party members feel a “heavy sense of betrayal” about Trump’s alleged actions? Are they in “an absolute tailspin” about those charges? Why or why not?

    What say you, Florida Republicans?

    Link

  195. says

    Biden Administration Announces Dramatic Plan to Cut Methane Pollution

    The Biden administration announced an ambitious new plan on Saturday to dramatically curb methane emissions, the second biggest cause of global warming after carbon dioxide. It would require oil and gas producers to detect and fix leaks of methane for the first time.

    The announcement came as the United Nations hosted the Cop28 climate summit in Dubai, where Vice President Kamala Harris delivered brief remarks. “We must have the ambition to meet this moment, to accelerate our investments and to lead with courage and conviction,” she said.

    The Environmental Protection Agency estimated that the new rule would prevent 58 million tons of methane emissions from 2024 to 2038—roughly equivalent to the amount of carbon dioxide emitted annually by coal-fired power plants in the United States. The administrative rule doesn’t need congressional approval and will take effect next year, although conservative groups are likely to challenge it in court. (The US Supreme Court has already placed limits on the administration’s efforts to fight climate change.)

    Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, called the policy “the most impactful climate rule that the United States has ever adopted in terms of addressing temperatures we would otherwise see.”

    In a separate announcement at the UN summit, the world’s 50 largest oil producers reached a new pact to reduce methane emissions by 80 to 90 percent by the end of the decade.

    Still, environmental groups have criticized Biden for not doing more to fight climate change by targeting fossil fuels like oil, coal, and gas. The administration has approved new drilling leases this year and domestic oil production has surged. The United States is poised to extract record amounts of oil and gas in 2023, which is on track to be the hottest year on record. Biden skipped the UN summit to focus on other issues, including Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

    Environmentalists have also faulted the UN for holding the summit in the United Arab Emirates, one of the world’s largest oil producers. The president of the summit is the head of the state-owned oil company.

  196. says

    Ukraine Update: Why a lack of armored vehicles is stalling Russia’s infantry assault

    A Ukrainian artillery spotting drone with a thermal camera hovers in the darkness, silently observing. Small glowing dots scurry across the dark landscape—Russian infantry.

    An almost single file of Russian infantrymen, perhaps 20-30 in all, are strung out over a short distance.

    Furious shelling occurs, as large explosions (heavy and light howitzers) and smaller explosions (mortar rounds) occur around and amongst the scurrying targets.

    Gradually, the Russian platoon reaches its staging area— the treeline. Perhaps the Russians felt safer, huddling close to each other underneath the foliage. Perhaps they thought the trees and vegetation hid them from observation.

    You can see in the shelling, the survivors resting, perhaps catching their breath from running the deadly explosive gauntlet to get to this point. They would need their strength to make the final assault on Ukrainian positions beyond the freeline.

    Then, a DPICM 155mm cluster munition artillery shell strikes. The characteristic shotgun-like circular explosive pattern rings around the Russian position. Each DPICM shell contains 72 sub-munitions, spraying shrapnel that is highly deadly to exposed infantry across a broad area.

    The Russians stop moving. Then, another Ukrainian howitzer shell lands directly on the Russian position to end the video.

    This short video illustrates why Russian attacks around Avdiivka have all but stalled in the past six weeks.

    This incident was geolocated to a small treeline a touch under 2km east of Stepove, a small village north of the heavily fortified Ukrainian held town of Avdiivka. [map at the link]

    In the nearly two months since launching its major offensive to capture of fortress town on October 10th, Russia has made small but incremental gains particularly north of the town, around 1.5 kilometers in about two weeks. [comparison maps at the link]

    However, despite repeatedly fighting their way into and contesting the village of Stepove, Russia has been unable to make any significant advances of more than a few hundred meters. [comparison maps at the link]

    This isn’t to say that Russian gains have been zero in Avdiivka. Both north and south of the town, waves of Russian infantry assaults have gradually increased the contested area of around Stepove, and north of Vodiane.

    But this Russian “progress” has been measured in meters, and the pace of the Russian advance has clearly and significantly slowed since the early days of the assault. This isn’t necessarily to say that Russia won’t eventually win a pyrrhic victory at a horrific cost and capture Avdiivka. But their progress has significantly slowed since the early days of the advance.

    So what’s changed?

    For one, Ukraine committed significant reinforcements to Avdiivka. At the start of the battle, only the battle-weary 110th Mechanized Brigade was defending Avdiivka. For well over a year, the 110th Brigade had been defending Avdiivka against periodic and persistent Russian attacks, turning back two major Russian assaults in January and March-May 2023.

    After the 110th was driven back north of Avdiivka, Ukraine hurriedly deployed one of its finest brigades, the 47th Mechanized Brigade to defend the northern flank of Avdiivka. With its Leopard 2A6 tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles, the 47th Brigade is one of Ukraine’s heaviest armored units. Ukraine also deployed the 53rd Mechanized Brigade to the south of Avdiivka to shore up its defenses there.

    However, the first elements of the 47th Mechanized were reportedly on the scene before October 20th. The Russian drive north of Avdiivka would not truly lose momentum for another 1-2 weeks. While the reinforcements tell part of the story, there may be additional elements to the loss of Russian momentum.

    So what else changed?

    Consider the pattern of verified Russian armored fighting vehicles losses around Avdiivka, as compiled by Andrew Perpetua. Here are the visually confirmed losses for October. Note that the Battle of Avdiivka begins in earnest on October 10th. [chart at the link shows visually verified Russian losses]

    Note how losses vary, presumably depending on the intensity of Russian assaults, but Russia is losing 15-25 armored vehicles on most days, while spikes of losses occur every 5-10 days Where Russia loses 40-70+ vehicles in a single day.

    Now look at Andrew Perpetua’s tabulation of losses for November. Note the shift in scale for the Y-axis. [chart at the link]

    Whereas in October, Russia was regularly losing 15-25 armored vehicles, including eight days between October 10th — 31st where Russia lost over 30 armored vehicles, Russia only lost more than 30 on two days in all of November,

    The total number of visually confirmed armored vehicles Russia lost around Avdiivka now exceeds 200, with Ukraine claiming to have destroyed over twice that many. As a result of these losses, Russia was forced to switch tactics, switching to mostly conducting Bakhmut-style infantry assaults.

    Russian infantry are not only conducting final assaults on Ukrainian positions on foot, they are being forced to do so after walking through miles of Ukrainian artillery kill zones to reach their staging points to even begin their assaults.
    ————————-
    To understand the difference, it’s probably helpful to see what a mechanized infantry assault looks like in practice. This is a mechanized assault being conducted by the Ukrainian 5th Assault Brigade in the hills near Klischiivka, south of Bakhmut in the Summer of 2023.

    The assault is conducted by an M113 Armored Personnel Carrier and a CV90 Infantry Fighting Vehicle (both of which carry squads of infantry) that are supported by a T-80 tank. [video at the link]

    The M113 and CV90 advance into the line of trees to the lefthand side of the video, disappearing into the foliage to reportedly drop off the soldiers at their staging area.

    Then you see the CV90 and the M113 pull back (again under artillery fire) while the T-80 continues firing at Russian positions and the infantry reportedly begins their assault. The narrator claims the assault was successful, but this is impossible to verify on the video.

    Now contrast this with the Russians advancing to their staging area on foot in the video described in the opening paragraphs of this article.

    This, in a nutshell, is why armored fighting vehicles are important in an infantry war.

    While the fire support from the T-80 tank is undoubtedly highly valuable, armored vehicles that deliver the troops from reserve areas to forward staging areas to begin their assault are just as important, if not more so.

    In ordinary defensive circumstances, one to two battalion of Russian troops, or 1-2,000 soldiers, are expected to occupy a 10 x 10 kilometer space of front. Reserve forces are generally kept 10-20 kilometers behind the lines, dispersed over a wide area, and assembled only when preparing for a major assault (or called to assist in defense). When Russia makes a concentrated assault, it moves up those reserve soldiers from the rear to temporarily bolster front-line strength.

    Those highly concentrated assault forces are extremely vulnerable to artillery or air strikes. A thousand soldiers spread out over 10 kilometers of front offer small targets of two or three soldiers at a time. An assault force features densely packed troops of 10-30 soldiers or more close to the front lines, making inviting targets for mass casualty events.

    The staging area for the assault can vary in distance, but will often be around 1-2 kilometers from enemy positions. The Russians attempting to assemble around 1.5 kilometers outside Stepove in the video above would be highly typical of this type of attack.

    In the earliest days of the assault on Avdiivka, Russia moved its infantry in massive columns of armored vehicles to try to protect them. Although Russia lost hundreds of vehicles to artillery fire and drones, the armored vehicles protected their infantry from artillery shrapnel as they were dropped off at their staging areas, vulnerable only to direct artillery, drone, or missile strikes. [video at the link]

    Unfortunately for Russia, their armored vehicle losses were unsustainable, so Russia has now switched to fully dismounted infantry assaults, who must now traverse 10 kilometers or more on foot, just to get in position to launch the attack.

    Not only do these units suffer significant combat losses just to get to the assembly point, but Russian soldiers accumulate dramatically more fatigue and mental exhaustion before they even begin their assaults.

    This, more than anything, likely explains why the Russian advance slowed from around 120 meters per day in the first two weeks of the assault north of Avdiivka, to a less than 20 meters per day crawl for the past month.

    This doesn’t mean that the Russian attack on Avdiivka will inevitably fail. If Russia continues to throw hundreds or thousands of Russian infantry at Ukrainian positions, they can continue to advance 10-20 meter a day over the next 10-15 months to close the 5km gap they need to cut the main supply line into Avdiivka.

    However, Russia has only sustained this crawling advance by losing an estimated 1,000 soldiers a day, an unsustainable longer-term rate even for Russia.

    Without a serious infusion of reinforcing armored vehicles for another major push, it appears the casualty costs and slow speed of the Russian advance are so problematic that it appears unlikely that Russia will capture Avdiivka on any reasonable timeline or cost.

  197. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 262

    “What say you, Florida Republicans?”

    I know what I would have said during my misspent right-wing youth: “Its all a lie! The press, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Communists made up these allegations to attack patriotic, Christian, parents who just what to protect children from smut, blasphemy, and disloyalty to America!”

    They’re probably saying the same thing.

  198. says

    Akira @265, well that’s disheartening. True, but depressing.

    In other news: DeSantis-bot glitches out, and ex-Trump aide says the former guy is ‘slowing down’

    If you somehow missed Thursday’s big debate between Govs. Gavin Newsom and Ron DeSantis, well, don’t fret. For one thing, Newsom didn’t debate DeSantis so much as curb-stomp him over and over like an increasingly shopworn series of Cabbage Patch dolls.

    Secondly, DeSantis is still running for president, so he’s not going anywhere. Other than nowhere, of course. Unless third place in the Iowa caucuses is now considered some kind of milk-and-honey-festooned promised land.

    Yes, DeSantis-bot glitched out several times over the course of the debate. It was like watching a deer caught in a car’s headlights … then a car’s grille … then a car’s windshield … and finally a car’s trunk, where the Flailing Florida Man struck a dashing pose […] Take, for instance, this exchange, previously highlighted by Daily Kos’ Walter Einenkel: [video at the link]

    Wow. That was something, huh? How are the smiling lessons going, Ron? Looks like you’ve finally mastered “constipated prairie chicken.” Next stop: “inflatable car wash dancer.”

    Of course, we may not have DeSantis to kick around much longer, so we better kick him now. (Figuratively, of course.) And this week he’s on the OG Sunday political show, “Meet the Press,” which promises to be a barrel of awkward, off-putting laughs.

    So let’s see how that went, shall we?

    Off we go!

    1. Have we mentioned how utterly screwed Republicans are on abortion? Oh, yes, we have, haven’t we? Well, they are, because they don’t have anything that approaches a consistent or coherent message. Democrats do: We need to codify Roe and ensure that private reproductive health care decisions are made by women in close consultation with their doctors. Democrats can look voters square in the eye and tell them that simple truth.

    Meanwhile, Republican presidential candidates are continually asked where they stand on federal abortion bans, and it’s like asking Louie Gohmert how the CERN supercollider works. Or Legos. Or underpants, for that matter. In other words, they don’t have the slightest clue what to say.

    DeSantis appeared with Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press” to discuss a campaign that’s shrinking in inverse proportion to his pupils whenever he gets asked about this stuff. [video at the link]

    WELKER: “You signed a six-week ban in the state of Florida, so voters want to know, people of Iowa want to know, where do you stand on this issue? Would you sign a six-week federal ban if it came to your desk? If you were president?”

    DESANTIS: “But we signed a legislation to stand for a culture of life that was done by the Florida Legislature. I mean, this was them bringing the will of the people …”

    WELKER: “So is that a yes? Is that a yes?”

    DESANTIS: “Well, Congress is not going to do any type of abortion legislation. They haven’t done abortion legislation—the only thing that’s impacted abortion on the federal level, I think the last thing is Obamacare in 2010. So we understand that, and so part of me promoting a culture of life is to do things that are achievable and that obviously would have consensus. No taxpayer funding for abortion. We’re going to eliminate the abortion tourism policy of the Department of Defense, and we’re going to protect the rights of states to enact pro-life protections.”

    “Come on, now! Congress won’t pass abortion legislation! Nothing has been done on abortion since 2010. And nothing of note has changed since then. Nope. Not a single thing. It’s moot. Next question! Wait, Dobbs? What is Dobbs? Now you’re just making baby noises. Can we get back to my talking points, please? […]

    Good Lord. Honestly, he’d be better off appearing on these shows wearing an “Ask Me About My Boot Lifts” button.

    BONUS!

    DeSantis has a really hard time condemning Donald Trump’s use of the word “vermin” to refer to one’s political enemies. Must be tough trying to continually walk that tightrope between full-blown Nazi rhetoric and the kind of stuff Hitler just randomly thought of in his shower. [video at the link]

    Geez, Ron, grow a pair. Of eyes, I mean. Can’t you see how hopelessly behind you are? Newsom was right. You need to drop out, ASAP.

    Master projectionist Donald Trump has lately been trying to claim that President Biden is actually our nation’s biggest threat to democracy—not the guy who literally tried to end America. And Trump is giving extremely low-energy speeches to make his point.

    Former White House Communications Director Alyssa Farah Griffin joined “State of the Union’s” expert panel to discuss this frothy nonsense, telling host Dana Bash that she’s noticed Trump is “slowing down.” […] [Tweet and video at the link]

    TRUMP (AT RALLY): “But Joe Biden is not the defender of American democracy, Joe Biden is the destroyer of American democracy. … So if Joe Biden wants to make this race a question of which candidate will defend our democracy and protect our freedoms, I say to Crooked Joe—and he’s crooked, the most corrupt president we’ve ever had—we will win that fight and we’re going to win it very big. Very big.”

    BASH: “Welcome back to ‘State of the Union.’ My panel joins me now. Alyssa, this is probably one of the least surprising things you’ve seen Donald Trump do. Right, I mean, if, if—I don’t want to call it ‘evil genius’ because, I don’t—but it’s so classic. To have something wrong with him, a negative, and he says, no, it’s the other guy.”

    FARAH GRIFFIN: “And just tries to flip it on its head and you heard the audience eat it up. It’s kind of remarkable—I was watching some of the clips from Trump’s visit to Iowa, and I’m stunned, having spent a lot of time with him in 2020 and years before, he is slowing down. There is a lack of sharpness in what he is saying, and a lack of kind of clarity. There’s another clip where he basically says he’s going to overturn Obamacare but then also says that he’d fix it. Just complete inconsistencies. And for Republicans, our strongest case against Joe Biden is, you know, the age and the decline that some of us have seen. And if I’m being honest, head to head, I’m not sure which is struggling more.”

    You’re not sure who’s struggling more? Trump. Trump is struggling more. Biden looks slightly bent over when he walks and occasionally elides or butchers a word or two [which may be due to overcoming a stutter]. He doesn’t continually claim he ran against George W. Bush, brag about passing preschool-level dementia tests, and confidently assert that windmills are murdering whales.

    Then again, Farah Griffin is a Republican. Who worked for Trump. Sometimes the deprogramming takes a while to fully kick in, apparently.

    The fake Biden impeachment is still a hot topic over at Fox News, and veteran journamalist Maria Bartiromo is all over it. There’s no need to rehash how empty and cynical this endeavor is. You can simply read this fact check […]. Or you could just stare into House Oversight Committee Chair Jim Comer’s eyes for 30 seconds and see for yourself that there’s nothing behind them but insensate evil and pingpong balls.

    But Republicans are determined to go ahead with the charade—so long as the people they’re accusing aren’t allowed to share their stories with the same public Comer, et al., have been dishonestly working into a lather for the past two years. [Comer refused to let Hunter Biden testify publicly.] [Tweet and video at the link]

    BARTIROMO: “[We want to] understand why you have had to take so long to actually get a vote to impeach, get this impeachment inquiry going. Do you feel that you have the votes within the House right now to get a formal impeachment inquiry?”

    COMER: “I do, and I had a reporter ask, well, what’s changed? You know, because the press has been writing we didn’t have the votes forever. And I said, well, I tell you one thing that changed. We were in Washington, D.C., for 10 weeks, and there were about 15 or 20 moderates that they really worry about what CNN says or what the Washington Post writes, and they were getting in their heads, Maria. But a great thing happened during Thanksgiving. The members went home—many of them for the first time and circulated for the first time in over 10 weeks—and they met people in Walmart and people on Main Street, and they’re like, what in the world have the Bidens done to receive millions and millions of dollars from our enemies around the world, and did they not pay taxes on it? So they heard from their constituents—yes, we want you to move forward, we want to know the truth. And we expect the Bidens to be held accountable for public corruption.”

    Got that? Those vulnerable House Republicans who represent Biden-leaning districts stopped reading The Washington Post for 10 days and started listening to the constitutional scholars picking out hydrogenated pie toppings at Walmart. Case closed. Joe Biden is as good as gone. […]

    National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby appeared on “Meet the Press” with Kristen Welker to discuss the Israel-Hamas war and a recent New York Times report alleging that Israeli intelligence obtained the battle plan for Hamas’ October terrorist attack more than a year before it occurred.

    So why, Welker wondered, didn’t U.S. intelligence have any inkling of this? Isn’t Israel supposed to share intelligence with us?

    I suspect you know the likely answer—even if Welker doesn’t. We’ll see if you’ve got your thinking caps on. The big, startling reveal will come … after the jump! [Tweet and video at the link]

    WELKER: “John, I have to ask you about this New York Times reporting which found that Israeli officials received Hamas’ specific attack plan over a year ago. Was the United States aware of this intelligence, and if not, why not?”

    KIRBY: “The intelligence community has indicated that they did not have access to this document. There’s no indications at this time that they had any access to this document beforehand.”

    WELKER: “Should they have, given how closely U.S. and Israeli intelligence officials coordinate, or are supposed to coordinate?”

    KIRBY: “Intelligence is a mosaic, and sometimes, you know, you can fashion things together and get a pretty good picture, other times there’s pieces of the puzzle that are missing. As I said, our own intelligence community said that they looked at this. They have no indications at this time that they had any advance warning of this document or any knowledge of it.”

    WELKER: “John, very quickly, was this a failure on the part of Israeli intelligence and U.S. intelligence?”

    KIRBY: “I think there’s going to be a time and a place for Israel to do that sort of forensic work. I mean, Prime Minister Netanyahu has already spoken pretty candidly about this, calling it a failure on their part. They’ll take a look at this at the right time. They need to do that. Right now, though, the focus has got to be on making sure that they can eliminate this truly genocidal threat to the Israeli people.”

    Gee, why wouldn’t Israel want to share intelligence with us? What might have happened in the past several years that could have given them pause? It’s a huge fucking mystery, isn’t it? [LOL]

    This one is a Video Daily Double: [image at the link]

    Oh, you need it spelled out? Okay, then.

    Foreign Policy, May 2017:

    Just days before President Donald Trump’s arrival in Tel Aviv, Israeli intelligence officials were shouting at their American counterparts in meetings, furious over news that the U.S. commander in chief may have compromised a vital source of information on the Islamic State and possibly Iran, according to a U.S. defense official in military planning.

    “To them, it’s horrifying,” the official, who attended the meetings, told Foreign Policy. “Their first question was: ‘What is going on? What is this?’” […]

    [B]ehind the public display of harmony, Israeli intelligence officers are angry and alarmed over the U.S. president revealing sensitive information in a May 10 meeting in the White House with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak.

    Well, maybe Welker doesn’t read Foreign Policy. Or NBC News. I’m pretty sure People magazine covered it, too, alongside Sergei Lavrov’s favorite braised turnip recipes.

    But wait! There’s more!
    – Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer says his country will “get to the bottom” of reports that Hamas’ attack plan was known to Israeli officials a year in advance. (ABC’s “This Week”)
    – Sen Lindsey Graham claims he supports Trump’s bizarre, out-of-the-blue calls for getting rid of Obamacare, which is now more popular than ever. (“State of the Union”)
    – Former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, an ex-Republican, says, “I don’t think there is a Republican Party. There is a cult around Donald Trump” and Trump “will tear down the very guardrails of our democracy.” (“The Saturday/Sunday Show With Jonathan Capehart”)
    – Chris Christie says Republicans should avoid setting a national policy on abortion. (“Face the Nation”)

    That’s it for today. Hope you’re all enjoying this joyful War on Christmas season. See you next week!

  199. says

    […] A U.S. warship in the Red Sea on Sunday shot down at least two drones, according to a U.S. defense official, with early assessments indicating that at least one was launched from a Houthi-controlled area of Yemen.

    The USS Carney, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, also observed a ballistic missile landing in the vicinity of a commercial vessel in the area, said the official, who spoke to The Washington Post on the condition of anonymity to discuss a fluid military situation.

    The commercial vessel, named Unity Explorer, sent a distress call to the USS Carney. While the naval ship was near the Unity Explorer, a drone approached the two ships and the Carney shot it down, the official said.

    Brig. Gen. Yahya Sarea, the Houthi military spokesman, said in a televised address that the attack was launched in solidarity with Palestinians. He said his Yemen-based force targeted the Unity Explorer and another ship “after they rejected warning messages from the Yemeni naval forces.”

    […] The Houthis are a rebel movement that controls much of Yemen’s north.

    U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria have faced near-daily assaults from rocket fire and one-way attack drones since Israeli operations in Gaza began, recording at least 76 attacks since Oct. 17, according to data provided by a U.S. defense official who spoke to The Post on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of ongoing operations.

    The United States has responded at times, including airstrikes targeting militants in Iraq after a close range ballistic missile attack on Nov. 20, the first use of such weapons in this stretch of attacks.

    Washington Post link

  200. says

    Palestinian American student shot in Vermont paralyzed from the chest down

    Hisham Awartani has had a bullet lodged in his spine since he was shot in Burlington along with two friends last weekend, according to his family and friends.

    Hisham Awartani, one of the three Palestinian students who were shot in Burlington, Vermont, last weekend is paralyzed from the chest down.

    On Thursday, Awartani’s mother, Elizabeth Price, told NBC News that her son was paralyzed from the midtorso downward and may not be able to walk again.

    “He has what they call an incomplete spinal injury, which means that he can feel, but he can’t move the areas that are currently paralyzed,” Price said. “He is going into intensive rehab later this week, and we hope that that will help with his prognosis.”

    In a GoFundMe created Saturday to raise money for Awartani’s medical expenses, his family and friends disclosed that “one of the bullets that struck him is lodged in his spine and has left him paralyzed from the chest down.”

    “The family is committed to his recovery and remain hopeful, in spite of the grave prognosis,” Awartani’s family said in a statement on the fundraiser page, which NBC News has confirmed is authentic.

    Awartani’s family and friends describe him as “a kind, gentle, brilliant young man with enormous potential.” A Palestinian Irish American who grew up in the West Bank, he speaks seven languages and is a teaching assistant at Brown University, where he studies math and archaeology.

    Awartani is dedicated to his studies, and is determined to start the next semester on time, according to his family and friends.

    Awartani was walking near his grandmother’s home on Nov. 25 with Kinnan Abdalhamid and Tahseen Ali Ahmad, all 20 years old, when a suspect pulled a gun on them without provocation and shot them.

    The students were speaking Arabic when they were attacked, and two of them were wearing Palestinian keffiyehs, scarves that have become a symbol of Palestinian solidarity.

    Awartani and Abdalhamid are U.S. citizens and Ali Ahmad is a legal U.S. resident.

    Awartani, a student at Brown University, was shot in the spine. Ali Ahmad was shot in the chest, and Abdalhamid was shot in the glute, according to court documents.

    Jason Eaton, 48, was arrested in connection with the shooting. Eaton has pleaded not guilty to three counts of second-degree attempted murder.

    The families of the victims and advocacy organizations are encouraging law enforcement to investigate the shooting of their children as a hate crime.

    “We believe a full investigation is likely to show our sons were targeted and violently attacked simply for being Palestinian,” a joint statement from the families read. “Full justice and accountability is important, and needed to ensure that this type of brutal and violent attack does not happen again.”

    Police have not yet revealed a motive for the shooting, saying it is an ongoing investigation.

  201. birgerjohansson says

    Huffpost has an article about Middle East advisor Brett MacGurk, who has a disproportionate influence over the US Middle East policy. He thinks like 19th century statesmen and does not care much about human rights.

  202. says

    Russia Is Fighting More Than One War. I Went to Check on the ‘Other’ One.

    Mahmoud Amed Nasser arrived in Turkey a month ago. It’s safe here, but he still can’t stop listening for the sound of planes. Russian planes.

    Nasser, 48, traveled from the rebel-held city of Idlib, Syria, to Turkey with his young grandson, who needs medical treatment for a congenital heart defect. In Syria, planes signal danger. Just the day before, he told me, his grandson was utterly terrified by the sounds of a commercial airliner.

    “All our children know the sounds,” Nasser said. Even though there was no danger there in Turkey, his grandson grabbed him and told him, “Granddad, there’s a warplane in the sky!”

    In Syria, he added, there is little they can do when Russian warplanes come, except hide and hope for the best. Oh, and “open your mouth,” he said with a grim laugh. Opening their mouths helps them not get injured or killed by the pressure waves from the blast, he explained.

    “We and the Ukrainians have the same enemy, have the same killer,” Nasser said.

    In Ukraine, Russian bombing is detected by radar and warnings sent over digital apps. Hundreds of foreign journalists relay the events. In Syria, the death and destruction comes without much notice — or attention from the outside world.

    The Russian military has continued to fight and commit atrocities in Syria for eight years, with no sign of slowing. It’s a signal to Ukraine of just how long Russia is willing to conduct indiscriminate attacks, and a warning that Russia is able to drag out conflicts over long periods of time.

    The war in Syria is also a sad reminder that public attention in the West fades, and that the Syrian civil war — once a central point in the U.S. foreign policy discussions — continues even after the vast majority of attention has shifted to other conflicts.

    More than 12 years ago, it was war in this part of the world that riveted the world’s attention. As part of the broader Arab Spring, Syrians marched for democratic rights in 2011. For a time they won Western attention and sympathy, as dictator Bashar Assad’s brutal crackdown was revealed through photographs and videos of torture, killings and the use of chemical weapons. But over the years, the war ground to a stalemate, and the world’s attention drifted away.

    I’m guilty of that, myself. As a reporter, I covered the Syrian civil war intimately in its early years. But time went on, and other topics came up. I’ve never forgotten about it, exactly, but it sort of shifted to the side.

    For almost two years now I’ve been reporting in Ukraine, covering Russia’s full-scale invasion and its efforts to seize more Ukrainian territory. I often thought about what was happening to Russia’s other war — the war that people were paying far less attention to, the one that it was fighting in support of Assad, a war of attrition where Russia aimed to outlast its enemies.

    So on a trip to Turkey, I decided to make a trip to the Syrian border to find out.

    […] only some wars have the misfortune of fading in the public consciousness while the killing continues largely unabated, ignored by nearly all except for victims and aggressors.

    Here’s what’s being ignored in Syria: An average of 84 civilians have been killed per day over the past decade, according to a U.N. estimate. This totals more than 306,000 deaths since 2011, when the Assad regime brutally cracked down on pro-democratic demonstrations and triggered the civil war.

    The U.N. has said that these numbers represent a minimum estimate and that the likely number killed is much higher. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a U.K.-based NGO, has made an estimate of over 600,000 killed, including civilians and non-civilians. Russia has been assisting Assad since 2015, conducting air and ground operations against the opposition forces.

    The war in Ukraine, also a conflict driven by Russian action, has made things even worse for Syrian civilians. Goran Ahmad, chair of the board at the humanitarian group Bahar, said it has added to skyrocketing inflation. He pointed out that flour in rebel-controlled parts of Syria now costs double what it did before Russia invaded Ukraine, which supplies much of the world with grain.

    Meanwhile, apparently taking advantage of the world’s attention being focused on Ukraine and Gaza, the Assad regime and Russia have stepped up their attacks in recent months. From January to July, there were a total of 388 bombardments. The second half of the year, which is not yet complete, has already seen 415, according to the Syrian Emergency Task Force, an American NGO that tallies attacks in Syria.

    Nasser and his grandson have been staying for about three weeks at the House of Healing, a charitable initiative in the southern Turkish city of Gaziantep, just about an hour from the Syrian border.

    […] The Syrians at this home — there were a few dozen waiting for help — come from places whose names might spur a brief moment of recognition from when they were regularly and intensely covered in the Western press a decade ago. Places like Aleppo, where 147 bodies were found in the river in 2013, likely executed in Assad regime-controlled areas. And Ghouta, where the Assad regime used a nerve agent, killing 1,429 people and testing President Barack Obama’s “red line” for American military intervention (the U.S. ultimately would not intervene).

    […] The world’s forgetting about the Syrian conflict is no mere inconvenience for Syrians fighting to uproot the Assad regime. […] The UAE began restoring diplomatic relations with the Assad regime in 2018. This year, Saudi Arabia and Jordan have pressed regional countries to recognize his government. And in May, Assad was welcomed back to a summit of the Arab League for the first time since 2011, in what Al Jazeera described as a “warm reception” — this despite an overwhelming amount of evidence that he and his regime have committed war crimes. Assad used the opportunity to deliver a speech stressing that other countries should not meddle in the “internal affairs” of Arab states.

    […] “Backed by war criminal [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and the terrorist Mullahs in Tehran, over half a million people in Syria have been slaughtered by this criminal regime, and over half the Syrian population has been displaced,” said Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), the lead sponsor of the bill, in a statement. “The Assad regime is illegitimate and poses a threat to peace and prosperity in the region.”

    […] a September 2018 poll found that 83 percent of Turks viewed Syrian refugees negatively. A majority of those upset with Syrian refugees cited economic issues like rising unemployment, lower wages and Syrian nonpayment of taxes.

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who welcomed Syrian refugees over a decade ago as “our brothers,” decided this year during his reelection campaign to promise the repatriation of a million Syrians back to Syria. His political opposition ran on even harsher measures.

    […] Caring increases international cooperation, which reduces local suffering — whether in Ukraine, or in Syria.

  203. says

    ‘Plain historical falsehoods’: How amicus briefs bolstered Supreme Court conservatives

    A POLITICO review indicates most conservative briefs in high-profile cases have links to a small cadre of activists aligned with Leonard Leo.

    Princeton Professor Robert P. George, a leader of the conservative legal movement and confidant of the judicial activist and Donald Trump ally Leonard Leo, made the case for overturning Roe v. Wade in an amicus brief a year before the Supreme Court issued its watershed ruling.

    Roe, George claimed, had been decided based on “plain historical falsehoods.” For instance, for centuries dating to English common law, he asserted, abortion has been considered a crime or “a kind of inchoate felony for felony-murder purposes.”

    The argument was echoed in dozens of amicus briefs supporting Mississippi’s restrictive abortion law in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court case that struck down the constitutional right to abortion in 2022. Seven months before the decision, the argument was featured in an article on the web page of the conservative legal network, the Federalist Society, where Leo is co-chair.

    In his majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito used the same quote from Henry de Bracton, the medieval English jurist, that George cited in his amicus brief to help demonstrate that “English cases dating all the way back to the 13th century corroborate the treatises’ statements that abortion was a crime.”

    George, however, is not a historian. Major organizations representing historians strongly disagree with him.

    That this questionable assertion is now enshrined in the court’s ruling is “a flawed and troubling precedent,” the Organization of American Historians, which represents 6,000 history scholars and experts, and the American Historical Association, the largest membership association of professional historians in the world, said in a statement. It is also a prime example of how a tight circle of conservative legal activists have built a highly effective thought chamber around the court’s conservative flank over the past decade.

    A POLITICO review of tax filings, financial statements and other public documents found that Leo and his network of nonprofit groups are either directly or indirectly connected to a majority of amicus briefs filed on behalf of conservative parties in seven of the highest-profile rulings the court has issued over the past two years.

    It is the first comprehensive review of amicus briefs that have streamed into the court since Trump nominated Justice Amy Coney Barrett in 2020, solidifying the court’s conservative majority. POLITICO’s review found multiple instances of language used in the amicus briefs appearing in the court’s opinions. [Chart at the link: 69% connected to Leo]

    The Federalist Society, the 70,000-member organization that Leo co-chairs, does not take political positions [or at least that’s what it claims]. But the movement centered around the society often weighs in through many like-minded groups. In 15 percent of the 259 amicus briefs for the conservative side in the seven cases, Leo was either a board member, official or financial backer through his network of the group that filed the brief. Another 55 percent were from groups run by individuals who share board memberships with Leo, worked for entities funded by his network or were among a close-knit circle of legal experts that includes chapter heads who serve under Leo at the Federalist Society.

    The picture that emerges is of an exceedingly small universe of mostly Christian conservative activists developing and disseminating theories to change the nation’s legal and cultural landscape. It also casts new light on Leo’s outsized role in the conservative legal movement, where he simultaneously advised Trump on Supreme Court nominations, paid for media campaigns promoting the nominees and sought to influence court decision-making on a range of cases.

    […] Like George’s view of abortion as a crime throughout history, arguments in amicus briefs often find their way into the justices’ opinions. In major cases involving cultural flashpoints of abortion, affirmative action and LGBTQ+ rights POLITICO found information cited in amicus briefs connected to Leo’s network in the court’s opinions.

    […] “There’s no real vetting process for who can file these amicus briefs,” said Larsen, and the justices often “accept these historical narratives at face value.”

    […] A former Supreme Court clerk, Larsen has called for reforms including disclosure of special interests behind “neutral-sounding organizations” which, in reality, are representing a broader political movement.

    For instance, Leo and George are board directors at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, which filed amicus briefs in support of the restrictive Mississippi abortion law in the Dobbs decision and in the case in which the court found a Colorado website designer could refuse to create wedding websites for same-sex couples. They are also both on the board of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which also filed briefs in those cases.

    […] In July of 2022, a few weeks after the Dobbs decision was announced, historical organizations issued a statement saying that abortion was not considered a crime according to the modern definition of the word and citing a “long legal tradition” — from the common law to the mid-1800s – of tolerating termination of pregnancy before a woman could feel fetal movement.

    “The court adopted a flawed interpretation of abortion criminalization that has been pressed by anti-abortion advocates for more than thirty years,” they wrote.

    A trio of scholars of medieval history also denounced Alito’s argument as misrepresenting the penalties involved related to abortion. The Latin word “crimen” was more akin to a sin that would be “absolved through penance” before the Church — and not a felony, said Sara McDougall, a scholar of medieval law, gender and justice at City University of New York Graduate Center. Further, the meaning of “abortion” often involved “beating a pregnant woman” and was so broad it covered infanticide, she said.

    “There’s not one felony prosecution for abortion in 13th century England. The church sometimes (but not always) imposed penance — but usually when the intent was to conceal sexual infidelity,” said McDougall, who was one of the three medieval scholars. Indeed, this medieval doctrine persisted for hundreds of years until Pope Pius IX proclaimed in 1869 that life began at conception, they wrote.

    […] While debates over when life begins date to ancient Greece, the definition George uses in an expanded version of his brief that he provided to POLITICO — that a child is an “immortal soul” after 42 days — came from the author of an early forerunner to the encyclopedia (c. 1240) who was a member of the Franciscan order and frequent lecturer on the Bible. It is not clear how, without modern ultrasound technology, a fetus’ gestational stage could have been determined in the 1300s.

    [One gets the feeling that anti-abortionists just cherry-picked all of history to come up with factoids they thought would support their case.]

    The case that abortion was a historical crime wasn’t part of the anti-abortion push until it was introduced by Dellapenna during an anti-abortion conference in the early 1980s, says Mary Ruth Ziegler, a legal historian who authored a book on the history of Roe. Dellapenna was a law professor at Villanova University and not a historian. Moreover, she said: “This was not a disinterested historian doing the research. This is someone at an anti-abortion event.”

    […] In April, Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk in Texas cited George’s 2008 book, “Embryo: A Defense of Human Life,” in the first footnote of his preliminary ruling invalidating the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the abortion pill, mifepristone. Kacsmaryk used George’s work to defend his use of the terms “unborn human” and “unborn child” — most often used by anti-abortion activists — instead of “fetus,” which is the standard term used by jurists.

    […] In June, when the court rejected affirmative action at colleges and universities across the nation, there were at least three instances in which Justice Clarence Thomas used the same language or citations from amicus briefs of filers connected to Leo, whose friendship and past business relationship with Thomas’s wife, Virginia Thomas, who is known as Ginni, have been reported. [chart at the link]

    […] The overall concentration of conservative amicus briefs in the LGBTQ+ rights case tied to Leo’s network is among the highest, at about 85 percent, of any of the seven cases reviewed. Many were filed by Catholic or Christian nonprofits in support of the plaintiff, a designer whose company is called 303 Creative.

    The two pillars of Leo’s network, The 85 Fund and the Concord Fund, gave $7.8 million between July of 2019 and 2021 to organizations filing briefs on behalf of 303 Creative LLC.

    […] Many of these professional ties are through the Center for National Policy, whose members have included Leo himself, Ginni Thomas, former Republican Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and former Vice President Mike Pence.

    […] While POLITICO’s analysis relies heavily on annual forms filed to the IRS, its approximations may underrepresent Leo’s influence over opinions presented to the court. That’s because the IRS does not require nonprofit groups to list members of advisory boards, and groups filing as churches don’t have to disclose their leadership. Leo’s organizations also route tens of millions of dollars through anonymous donor-advised funds like DonorsTrust, making it unclear where it is going.

    […] “In law reasons are everything. Rationale is our currency. It matters that they’re using the briefs to justify themselves,” said Larsen, who wrote a 2014 research report titled The Trouble with Amicus Facts.

    “They’re looking to amicus briefs to support their historical narrative,” she said.

    Much more at the link.

  204. StevoR says

    Good article with some nice animations and info here :

    The inner edge of the habitable zone will cross Earth’s orbit in about a billion years (give or take a few hundred million years). From that point on, there won’t be any more liquid water on Earth. Game over. But is there anything that might happen in the next billion years that could save the Earth? Maybe. ..(Snip).. Every billion years there is a 1% chance that a star will pass within 100 astronomical units of the Sun. Remember, 1 astronomical unit – or au – is the Earth-Sun distance, so a star flying within 100 au has a chance of having an effect on the planets’ orbits. A billion years is the time that Earth has left on its doomsday clock (at least the astronomical one), so this means that there’s a 1% chance that a star will flyby and shake things up before it’s too late.

    Source : https://planetplanet.net/2023/11/21/could-a-stellar-flyby-save-earth-from-impending-doom/

  205. Reginald Selkirk says

    Ancient redwoods recover from fire by sprouting 1000-year-old buds

    When lightning ignited fires around California’s Big Basin Redwoods State Park north of Santa Cruz in August 2020, the blaze spread quickly. Redwoods naturally resist burning, but this time flames shot through the canopies of 100-meter-tall trees, incinerating the needles. “It was shocking,” says Drew Peltier, a tree ecophysiologist at Northern Arizona University. “It really seemed like most of the trees were going to die.”

    Yet many of them lived. In a paper published yesterday in Nature Plants, Peltier and his colleagues help explain why: The charred survivors, despite being defoliated, mobilized long-held energy reserves—sugars that had been made from sunlight decades earlier—and poured them into buds that had been lying dormant under the bark for centuries…

  206. Reginald Selkirk says

    Can Anyone Give An Actual Argument For Atheism?

    by Casey Chalk
    … Cohen’s atheism, she explains, “derives naturally from a few simple observations.” The first of these is that many religious traditions are based on mythical accounts that are obviously fanciful, and that many others — such as Mormonism and Scientology — are so absurd as to merit nothing but derision.

    Yet from the premise that some religions are mythical or downright preposterous, it does not follow that all religions are thus, just as recognizing that the history of medical science has been full of quackery (and often still is) does not mean modern medicine is all illegitimate. Indeed, if there were a God, it’s at least plausible he might even make use of the mythical genre to communicate truths to primitive cultures whose understanding of the world is informed by such stories, as many scholars posit God does in the Old Testament…

    Cohen’s arguments against God, little more than regurgitations of the tired rhetoric of the New Atheists, are superficial, illogical, and emotive. They are also embarrassingly ignorant. There is absolutely no engagement with any of the classical arguments for God’s existence, be they Thomas Aquinas’s “Five Ways” or Anselm’s ontological argument. Nor is there any interaction with the best responses to the New Atheists, such as from theologian David Bentley Hart or philosopher Ed Feser. It’s certainly possible all of the arguments in favor of God’s existence are bad, but if Cohen believes them to be so, she offers no rebuttals.

    Instead, she complains that atheists are held to an unfair standard by those who expect them to be able to “prove that God doesn’t exist.” Well, given that’s the definition of atheism … yes, one should be able to demonstrate that. Or is Cohen demanding atheists be allowed to be intellectually lazy? …

    If he wanted a serious philosophical treatise, maybe he should have read one of those instead. Plenty of those exist.

  207. says

    Followup to Reginald @276.

    Texas GOP balks at proposed ban on associating with Nazi sympathizers

    For much of the American mainstream, Nick Fuentes’ name is probably unfamiliar, and as we’ve discussed, that’s a good thing. He is, after all, a radical who’s called for “a homeland” for white people, who’s engaged in Holocaust denialism, who’s expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler, and whose YouTube page was permanently suspended for promoting hate speech.

    Fuentes nevertheless tries to maintain a high public profile — a couple of congressional Republicans have even spoken at some of his right-wing events — and he attended a meeting in Texas in October. That wouldn’t have been especially notable were it not for the fact that Matt Rinaldi, chairman of the Texas GOP, was seen going into the same building at the same time.

    Rinaldi has insisted that he met with someone else at the time and didn’t even know Fuentes was there. But the controversy that followed — Fuentes did meet with others closely tied to Texas Republicans — gave a jolt to party politics in the Lone Star State.

    It was against this backdrop that several members of the Texas GOP’s executive committee initially called for the party to end its associations with specific local groups known for their white supremacist ties. A proposed resolution on the matter was soon after watered down to bar associations with individuals or groups “known to espouse or tolerate antisemitism, pro-Nazi sympathies or Holocaust denial.”

    As The Texas Tribune reported, this weakened effort was rejected, too.

    Two months after a prominent conservative activist and fundraiser was caught hosting white supremacist Nick Fuentes, leaders of the Republican Party of Texas have voted against barring the party from associating with known Nazi sympathizers and Holocaust deniers. In a 32-29 vote on Saturday, members of the Texas GOP’s executive committee stripped a pro-Israel resolution of a clause that would have included the ban.

    The Texas Tribune report added, “In a separate move that stunned some members, roughly half of the board also tried to prevent a record of their vote from being kept.”

    It’s one thing to get an issue wrong; it’s something else when people know they’re getting an issue wrong and want to keep their efforts hidden in the shadows.

    […] For what it’s worth, Texas Republican officials will meet again in February, at which point they’ll likely have an another opportunity to consider the issue.

  208. says

    Republicans use AI images to create xenophobic newsreel of nonexistent threat

    What do you do when there’s an election coming up and your party doesn’t have any policies, your own members admit they’ve failed at everything, and you don’t even have a platform? If you’re the Republican National Congressional Committee, there is only one answer: Use AI-generated images to create a 1930s-style newsreel pitching a xenophobic threat that not only doesn’t exist, but can’t exist.

    Republicans have no passed or even pending legislation to tout. There’s no health care plan. There’s no education plan. There’s no plan at all. Other than endless hearings in a wasted effort to find something they can pin on President Joe Biden, the only thing they have to show for their control of the House are vicious interparty fights. Republicans went 15 rounds of voting to make Kevin McCarthy speaker, then kicked out McCarthy and spent 22 days without a speaker before selecting someone whose only credentials are that no one knew who he was.

    So what are they running on? Claims that without them, illegal immigrants will overrun the National Parks. Even though that has never happened. And there are really good reasons why it can’t.

    Nothing says “no, I’m not a Nazi” like recreating an old newsreel format and filling it with propaganda designed to create fear of the “other.” [Image at the link]

    The response to this should be … is that the best they can do? Really? Given enormously capable AI tools that can make any image they want, and a clear lack of anything resembling morality, an excess of tents in a National Park is the issue that Republicans are genuinely running with as their lever to pry open vulnerable Democratic seats.

    The problems with this are nearly infinite, but here’s a good place to start: National Parks already have extremely strict (some hikers would even say draconian) rules about camping without a permit or in non-designated areas. Hikers and backpackers in national parks often have to seek permits to camp months in advance, and camping must be done in very specific areas. Just showing up and plopping down a tent is a fast route to serious fines and significant jail time.

    Here’s the recent story of one hiker who dared camp in the wrong place for a single night, even though the camping followed a medical emergency in which one member of their party had to be evacuated. [video at the link]

    In some parks, hikers are required to stay in designated shelters, and God help you if that shelter is full, heavy snow is falling, and it’s 19 miles to the next shelter. Park rangers are the original f**k and around find out guys.

    But even without the laws that parks already have in place to limit the number of visitors and strictly control where people are allowed to camp, there’s a much better reason why the National Parks aren’t already overrun with immigrants or with homeless people from right here in America: They’re parks.

    As in, places like Yosemite or Yellowstone are largely wilderness by design. Camping there requires bringing in food, water, and anything else necessary to get through the day. Camping for an extended period takes extensive planning, is difficult, and is often expensive.

    The best indicator of the inherent ridiculousness of this Republican fearmongering is how much this is not happening now. No one, but no one, is running into large groups of immigrants or homeless people, in National Parks.

    But then, Republicans aren’t interested in reality. This isn’t even the first ad campaign in which they’ve used AI images to create a vision of a bleak dystopian future. Last spring, Republicans ran another ad campaign using AI images. Guess what that one was about. [image at the link showing AI generated immigrants crossing a river]

    To be fair, the first Republican fantasy-fest wasn’t all about immigrants. It also featured AI-generated images of cities burning and cities overrun with people who are simply … not white. All of it is designed around the horrible fears that dominate Republican minds. Fears like diversity, acceptance, equality, and progress.

    Republicans are sure to do this again. They can’t find the images they need in reality. So they’re increasingly turning to AI to get that visceral thrill of seeing the dystopian future that’s sure to exist … if we don’t give all power to a single-party authoritarian government whose leader has promised to gather up all the unsuitable people, put them in massive camps, and do away with the protections of law.

    If the Republicans want a real challenge, they could try making a propaganda reel showing what things will be like if they win.

    But then, that reel has already been done.

  209. says

    ‘We are out of money to support Ukraine in this fight,’ Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young said in a letter to congressional leaders.

    Washington Post link

    The White House issued an urgent warning to Congress on Monday about Ukraine’s need for additional aid to help it resist Russia’s invasion, with Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young bluntly writing in a letter to congressional leaders that the United States is “out of money to support Ukraine in this fight.”

    In the letter, Young wrote that “without congressional action, by the end of the year we will run out of resources to procure more weapons and equipment for Ukraine and to provide equipment from U.S. military stocks.”

    “There is no magical pot of funding available to meet this moment. We are out of money — and nearly out of time,” she added, emphasizing that Congress must decide whether “we continue to fight for freedom across the globe or we ignore the lessons we have learned from history and let [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and autocracy prevail.”

    A Biden administration request for nearly $106 billion for Ukraine, Israel and other needs remains stalled on Capitol Hill.

    The White House has faced difficulty garnering support from Republicans for continued aid to Ukraine […] Republicans have sought to tie the aid negotiations to U.S.-Mexico border policy changes — an issue on which Congress has failed to take broad-ranging action for decades.

    […] “House Republicans have resolved that any national security supplemental package must begin with our own border,” Johnson’s [ House Speaker Mike Johnson (D-La.)] statement said. “We believe both issues can be agreed upon if Senate Democrats and the White House will negotiate reasonably.” [Republicans are making unreasonable demands, like building Trump’s wall, changing asylum rules in ways that would prevent most immigrants from requesting asylum, etc.]

    In September, under pressure from House Republicans, lawmakers agreed to strip Ukraine aid from a bill to continue funding the government and avert a shutdown. [hostage taking by the Republicans] The rejection came nine days after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky flew to Washington and pleaded with lawmakers to maintain aid.

    The Biden administration request includes about $61 billion for Ukraine, $14 billion for Israel, roughly $14 billion for immigration priorities and $10 billion for humanitarian aid, as well as more funding to counter China’s influence in Asia and the developing world.

    Without congressional action to continue the flow of U.S. military equipment and resources to Ukraine, Young wrote, the United States would “kneecap Ukraine on the battlefield, not only putting at risk the gains Ukraine has made, but increasing the likelihood of Russian military victories.”

    “Already, our packages of security assistance have become smaller and the deliveries of aid have become more limited,” Young wrote. “If our assistance stops, it will cause significant issues for Ukraine. While our allies around the world have stepped up to do more, U.S. support is critical and cannot be replicated by others.” […]

    Putin is getting what he wanted.

  210. says

    Supreme Court tackles Sackler family liability protections in opioid settlement

    The Biden administration is questioning a bankruptcy plan that lets the Sackler family avoid future lawsuits related to the opioid epidemic.

    The Supreme Court on Monday [today] will examine the Biden administration’s objection to the bankruptcy reorganization of opioid maker Purdue Pharma, which includes a provision that protects the Sackler family from liability from future lawsuits.

    It is no ordinary bankruptcy case, touching as it does upon the nationwide harm caused by the opioid crisis and the role that Sackler-owned Purdue played in creating it.

    As part of the proposed deal, which the Supreme Court put on hold in August, the Sackler family had agreed to pay around $6 billion that could be used to settle opioid-related claims, but only in return for a complete release from any liability in future cases.

    The overall settlement, including assets held by Purdue, is likely to be worth significantly more, with the reorganized company set to dedicate itself to tackling the impact of opioid abuse.

    […] During oral arguments on Monday, the justices will probe whether the bankruptcy court had the authority to release the Sackler family members from the claims being made by opioid victims.

    Purdue made billions from OxyContin, a widely available painkiller that fueled the opioid epidemic. The company’s tactics in aggressively marketing the drug came under increasing scrutiny as thousands of people died from opioid overdoses in recent years.

    The company sought bankruptcy protection, but the Sackler family members did not. Instead, they negotiated a separate deal with Purdue and plaintiffs in pending lawsuits that would allow the company to reinvent itself to address the opioid crisis.

    The Biden administration objects to the release of additional claims against the Sacklers, saying it would be unfair to potential future plaintiffs.

    Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote in a court filing that the settlement prevents the Sacklers from facing “claims alleging damages in the trillions” while “keeping billions of dollars that they siphoned from Purdue.”

    In a May decision, the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals approved the plan over the objection of William Harrington, the U.S. government trustee monitoring the bankruptcy. The Justice Department’s trustee program, of which Harrington is part, is aimed at ensuring that the bankruptcy system operates as required under law.

    Purdue has criticized Harrington’s role, noting that groups representing thousands of plaintiffs have signed on to the settlement, which could not have happened without the Sackler family contribution.

    “This intense, yearslong process culminated in a series of interlocking agreements dependent on the multibillion-dollar settlement reached with the Sacklers,” Purdue lawyers said in court papers.

    At the Supreme Court, various groups representing plaintiffs are supporting Purdue, including one that includes 1,300 cities, counties and other municipalities, and another representing 60,000 individuals affected by the opioid epidemic.

    In one brief filed by a group representing a large array of plaintiffs, lawyers wrote that their clients “have no love lost for the Sacklers” but recognize that the settlement is “the only means of getting billions of dollars in life-changing and live-saving funds … that are desperately needed today.”

    Canadian municipalities and Indigenous First Nations are among those objecting to the settlement.

    Purdue flourished under brothers Mortimer and Raymond Sackler, who died in 2010 and 2017, respectively. The family reaped billions and spent lavishly […]

    The family told the Supreme Court that it continues to back the settlement.

    In a brief filed on behalf of the relatives of Mortimer Sackler, most of whom are based overseas, lawyers warned of “significant litigation costs and risks” in seeking to enforce any foreign court judgments against the family if the settlement were thrown out.

  211. says

    I don’t have to give an argument for atheism and neither does anyone else, it’s disbelief. I just disbelieve. Someone else want me to defend my disbelief, do the work of explaining why their beliefs aren’t believable.

  212. Reginald Selkirk says

    @281
    … the only thing they have to show for their control of the House are vicious interparty fights.

    Probably should be intraparty fights

  213. Reginald Selkirk says

    23andMe confirms hackers stole ancestry data on 6.9 million users

    On Friday, genetic testing company 23andMe announced that hackers accessed the personal data of 0.1% of customers, or about 14,000 individuals. The company also said that by accessing those accounts, hackers were also able to access “a significant number of files containing profile information about other users’ ancestry.” But 23andMe would not say how many “other users” were impacted by the breach that the company initially disclosed in early October.

    As it turns out, there were a lot of “other users” who were victims of this data breach: 6.9 million affected individuals in total…

  214. says

    About that Heritage Foundation “Project 2025” questionnaire, this is from the New York Times:

    […] Candidates are asked whether they agree or disagree with the statement that “the president should be able to advance his/her agenda through the bureaucracy without hinderance from unelected federal officials.”

    Commentary:

    For several decades, the Heritage Foundation has been more than a leading think tank for the right, it’s also helped serve as a farm team of sorts for Republican officials: GOP offices looking for qualified and professional staffers routinely turned to Heritage for personnel assistance. […]

    With this recent history in mind, Axios reported a few weeks ago on the Heritage Foundation “pre-screening the ideologies” of thousands of people hoping to work in a second Trump administration. The goal, the report added, is to “install a pre-vetted, pro-Trump army of up to 54,000 loyalists across government to rip off the restraints imposed on the previous 46 presidents.” These far-right ideologues would be deployed throughout the federal bureaucracy, taking on “legal, judicial, defense, regulatory and domestic policy jobs.”

    […] Axios advanced the story, shining a light on “the exact questionnaires Trump allies are using” as part of the pre-screening process. […] [See New York Times excerpt above]

    Link

  215. says

    As summarized by Steve Benen from an NBC News article:

    Gov. Doug Burgum struggled in recent months to gain national traction, and this morning, the North Dakota Republican suspended his longshot presidential campaign. The governor is the latest in a GOP series of candidates to drop out, following Miami Mayor Francis Suarez, former Rep. Will Hurd, businessman Perry Johnson, media personality Larry Elder, former Vice President Mike Pence, and Sen. Tim Scott.

  216. says

    Steve Benen:

    Former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, who’ll appear on The Rachel Maddow Show tonight, told CBS News’ John Dickerson that if her party were in the majority after the 2024 elections, “I do think it presents a threat” to the U.S. political system.

  217. says

    Rep. James Comer’s newest ‘smoking gun’ debunked in record time

    Rep. James Comer put a considerable amount of product in his hair Monday before recording a video claiming to have new smoking-gun evidence of President Joe Biden’s corruption. Comer, who chairs the House Oversight Committee, dramatically announced that “Hunter Biden’s legal team and the White House’s media allies claim Hunter’s corporate entities never made payments directly to Joe Biden. We can officially add this latest talking point to the list of lies. Today, the House Oversight Committee is releasing subpoenaed bank records that show Hunter Biden’s business entity, Owasco PC, made direct monthly payments to Joe Biden.” [video at the link]

    Sounds devastating. Right-wing media outlets excitedly pushed out the details, specifically that Hunter Biden set up “recurring payments” of $1,380 in late 2018. Besides being an extraordinarily small amount of money in the grand scheme of corruption, the thinnest digging revealed that Joe Biden was not president in 2018. In fact, deeper investigation reveals that Biden wasn’t even in any political office at the time!

    Receipts were then posted that revealed Hunter Biden was paying his father back for helping to cover car payments while he was in between jobs. The three monthly payments totaled $4,140.

    […] every single smoking gun these guys announce seems to prove that President Joe Biden has been a very supportive father. He sure hasn’t helped his son-in-law get $2 billion in Saudi money, but we all can’t be that good at “winning.”

  218. says

    Commander projects Mikey Weinstein on screen at unit gathering, calls him “anti-Christian terrorist“

    That time of year is upon us once again — that joyful season when crusading Christian military commanders bent on bringing all of their subordinates to Jesus abuse their authority to compel all to have a merrily mandatory Christmas. Often, this is done in the form of a commander’s Christmas party, which all unit members are expected to attend, lest they end up in the “naughty” column on their commander’s “naughty or nice” list (a distinction that, in all seriousness, could negatively affect their careers).

    In this story, the commander, who, according to two Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) installation representatives in the unit, “belongs to a well known Christian proselytizing organization whose express mission is to spread The Gospel of Jesus Christ in the military community,” was planning his annual “Christmas Extravaganza Party.” This “party,” as described by the MRFF reps, who had been at it the two previous years, is “more like a solemn Christmas religious service and less like a party,” with “chaplains who lead sectarian Christian prayers” and only the most religious of Christmas carols sung.

    And, of course, attendance was not to be optional, with the commander saying he expected the unit’s “full participation” at “my Christmas Extravaganza Party.”

    But this year, 47 members of the unit (36 of whom are Christians, as are the two MRFF reps) decided to put a stop to their commander’s torturous tradition, calling upon the MRFF reps to represent them. With threats of bringing in Mikey Weinstein and the full force of MRFF, the commander at length relented, reluctantly agreeing to the demands of the MRFF reps and their 47 clients to rename the event and make it inclusive of all.

    The story doesn’t end there, however. The true insanity didn’t occur until a few days later. As the MRFF reps reported in an e-mail to Mikey Weinstein (emphasis added):

    “Several days later at a previously scheduled mandatory unit gathering, our Commander started the meeting off by getting all jacked about what had happened with our demands. He started loudly yelling about what had gone down with the new name change and other inclusive changes for ‘his’ Christmas event and the new emphasis on inclusion and diversity. He said that the ‘globalist War on Christmas’ had no place in his unit and that ‘Christmas is for everybody anyway.’ He then said that he knew that many in our unit were as equally pissed off as he was. And that they should direct and vent their rage against ‘that anti-Christian terrorist Mikey Weinstein and the anti-Christian MRFF.’ He then had the screen projector show a picture of Mikey with his 800 phone number at the MRFF plainly visible.”

    But this Christmas-crazed commander wasn’t done yet. He continued his raucous retaliatory rant by telling the unit’s members to contact their members of Congress in support of Christian nationalist Rep. Mike Turner’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) amendment to shut MRFF down by making it illegal for military members to contact or respond to MRFF (a measure that is still up in the air with the NDAA still in conference and the final bill not having been passed yet). As the MRFF reps wrote in their e-mail to Mikey (emphasis added):

    “Our Commander then additionally advised all attendees to contact their Members of Congress as Congress was ‘just this far away’ (he held up his left thumb and left forefinger to indicate a very short distance) from finally accomplishing the banning of MRFF from even existing anymore. He even told everyone that this was his personal Christmas wish for this year.

    When I first heard about this commander putting a picture of Mikey up on the screen, I couldn’t help but be reminded of the time, over a decade and a half ago now, when a prominent fundamentalist mega-church pastor put Mikey’s picture up on the large screen TVs in his church, dubbing him the “Field General of the Godless Armies of Satan.” As outrageous as that was, that was a civilian pastor, who was free to do it. This is a freakin’ military commander, which is an altogether different matter!

    Here is the entire e-mail from the two MRFF reps, who we all should congratulate on a job well done!

    From: (MRFF Reps’/Clients’ e-mail address withheld)
    Subject: Our Commander calls Mikey and MRFF “Anti-Christian Terrorists” after renaming of unit’s “Christmas Extravaganza Party”
    Date: December 1, 2023 at 5:02:50 PM MST
    To: Mikey Weinstein

    Hello Mikey and all of our colleagues at the MRFF.

    The undersigned are both MRFF representatives at a large U.S. military installation. We both happen to be practicing Christians however from different denominations.

    Please keep any of our identity information redacted from this communication for the obvious reasons of avoiding retaliation.

    We are not actually requesting Mikey or MRFF’s additional specific help on this matter at the moment as we have already been able to use our positions as MRFF reps on our military installation as a force multiplier to get our Commander to take the action we demanded from him. But we wanted you all to know what just went down anyway.

    It’s just so disgraceful!

    Our unit has a distinct combat mission and is fairly large and very diverse. Like most military units It is comprised of outstanding personnel from many different ethnicities, religions, cultures, theologies or lack thereof and related personal backgrounds.

    Our Commander is a well known supporter of evangelical Christianity, especially never missing an opportunity to try to spread it in uniform and on duty using his rank and influence. He belongs to a well known Christian proselytizing organization whose express mission is to spread The Gospel of Jesus Christ in the military community.

    In past years he has made it clear that he expected the unit’s “full participation” at “my Christmas Extravaganza Party”. Having been at the last 2 of these we can assure you that these gatherings are more like a solemn Christmas religious service and less like a party. There are chaplains who lead sectarian Christian prayers and New Testament bible readings at these events and the only Christmas carols on tap to be sung by all attendees are the most sectarian possible. No “Jingle Bells”, “Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer” or “Frosty the Snowman”. Just “Joy to the World”, “Silent Night”, “Hark The Herald Angels Sing” and “Come All Ye Faithful” and the like. So much for morale, discipline good order and especially unit cohesion. So many attendees have felt badly alienated and ostracized. But what could we all do? It’s essentially mandatory to attend as per our Commander’s “full participation expectation”.

    So this year we were asked by 47 active duty military members here at our installation to request that this agonizing event be renamed and reorganized IAW [in accordance with] all of the diversity, equity and inclusion principles of our service branch and DoD. As well as on-point service branch regulations and the Core Values of our service branch. 36 of our 47 MRFF clients are either Protestant or Catholic. 4 are Jewish, 2 are Islamic. 1 is Buddhist, 1 is Sikh and 3 self-identify as Atheist or Agnostic. At the top of our demand list to the Commander was to rename the event as our unit “Holiday Season Party” and to deep-six the name of “Christmas Extravaganza Party”.

    We requested to meet with our Commander but somehow he was constantly “unavailable”. Instead he had us meet with his “Christmas Event Coordination Team”. After a pretty contentious 2 hour-plus meeting, including serious threats by us to bring in Mikey personally and the MRFF full force to achieve our goals, it was agreed to rename and reorganize the event to make it secular and inclusive for all unit attendees as per our demands. Clearly nobody from Command wanted the MRFF to roll in and engage any further which frankly we found to be delightful! We were so happy we had prevailed!

    Our happiness was short-lived, however.

    Several days later at a previously scheduled mandatory unit gathering, our Commander started the meeting off by getting all jacked about what had happened with our demands. He started loudly yelling about what had gone down with the new name change and other inclusive changes for “his” Christmas event and the new emphasis on inclusion and diversity. He said that the “globalist War on Christmas” had no place in his unit and that “Christmas is for everybody anyway”. He then said that he knew that many in our unit were as equally pissed off as he was. And that they should direct and vent their rage against “that anti-Christian terrorist Mikey Weinstein and the anti-Christian MRFF”. He then had the screen projector show a picture of Mikey with his 800 phone number at the MRFF plainly visible. Our Commander then additionally advised all attendees to contact their Members of Congress as Congress was “just this far away” (he held up his left thumb and left forefinger to indicate a very short distance) from finally accomplishing the banning of MRFF from even existing anymore. He even told everyone that this was his personal Christmas wish for this year.

    Most people at this meeting seemed shocked by these rage antics by our Commander. People were looking around at each other with confusion, fear and even embarrassment by what he was screaming about. Needless to say no one is particularly looking forward to this mandatory “party” given the unjustified wrath displayed by our Commander towards Mikey and the MRFF. And we presume the two of us as installation MRFF reps as well.

    We all want to thank Mikey and the whole of MRFF for always being there for us. Through the years the MRFF has intervened successfully many times at our particular military installation. Were it not for the MRFF we would never have had the resolve to stand up to our Commander in the first place on behalf of our 47 MRFF clients and comrades-in-arms. If any of us get any personal blowback from our Commander or his lackeys we will immediately ask for MRFF’s help in fighting back.

    (Names, ranks, titles, unit, and installation of both MRFF Reps withheld)

  219. says

    Florida attorney general is arguing in court for virtually unlimited book-banning authority

    Republicans like to rail against public schools as “government schools,” with the implication that they are sites where the government brainwashes children with liberal and “woke” ideology. Now, Florida Republicans are in court arguing that Florida public schools are their government schools and can be required to push their message—all the way down to the books in the school libraries.

    In response to two lawsuits against the Escambia County and Lake County school boards and, in one case, state education officials, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and the two school boards are arguing, as Moody put it in her brief, that “Public-school systems, including their libraries, convey the government’s message.” According to Moody, who is representing the state, public school libraries are “a forum for government speech,” not a “forum for free expression.” The logical extension of that position is that whoever is in charge of the government gets to decide on all of the information that is not only taught in schools but available in their libraries.

    Republicans are of course safe in pushing this idea because while they will ban books with LGBTQ+ characters and anti-racist messages, Democratic administrations tend to leave decisions up to the professionals in the schools. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, for example, is not pushing for the removal of books with straight characters because she is herself LGBTQ+.

    This lawsuit, reported on in depth by the Tallahassee Democrat, is a classic case of Republicans ignoring concerns about hypocrisy to simply argue for whatever gives them power at any given moment.

    “There’s considerable irony in that those who seek to limit access to books in school libraries often say they’re fighting for parental rights,” said Ken Paulson, director of the Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University. “If government speech determines what books can be in the library, the government is essentially saying your children can only see the ideas that the government has approved.

    “That’s not parental rights,” he added. “That’s authoritarianism.”

    A group of First Amendment scholars filed an amicus brief in one of the cases, describing the Escambia County board’s argument, one shared by the state, as an “aggressive, unprecedented interpretation of the government speech doctrine” being deployed “to justify the politically motivated manipulation of the contents of public school libraries.” That amicus brief offers multiple grounds for the courts to completely reject the claim that schools are a forum for government speech (a term with a specific, limited meaning in legal precedent). The problem, of course, is the courts today.

    The current Supreme Court has shown that it will overturn decades of precedent for partisan benefit. So we’ll see how this one goes. But when Republicans try to claim that they’re not really banning books, remember their argument in court that “Public-school systems, including their libraries, convey the government’s message.” At least, that’s what they want when Republicans are in charge.

  220. says

    […] There’s also this Slate letter signed by Dahlia Lithwick, Joyce White Vance and others on the sexual torture that was visited on Israeli women on October 7. It is Definition Trigger Warning. If you are (and I was!) of the vague opinion that sex crime as war crime is bad but like the least of the atrocities, well. You will be disabused. […]

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/a-message-from-your-editrix

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/11/israeli-women-victims-sexual-assault-need-support.html

  221. Reginald Selkirk says

    Texas sues Pfizer with COVID anti-vax argument that is pure stupid

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Pfizer last week, claiming the pharmaceutical giant “deceived the public” by “unlawfully misrepresenting” the effectiveness of its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and sought to silence critics.

    The lawsuit also blames Pfizer for not ending the pandemic after the vaccine’s release in December 2020. “Contrary to Pfizer’s public statements, however, the pandemic did not end; it got worse” in 2021, the complaint reads.

    “We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies,” Paxton said in a press release. “The facts are clear. Pfizer did not tell the truth about their COVID-19 vaccines.”

    In all, Paxton’s 54-page complaint acts as a compendium of pandemic-era anti-vaccine misinformation and tropes while making a slew of unsupported claims. But, central to the Lone Star State’s shaky legal argument is one that centers on the standard math Pfizer used to assess the effectiveness of its vaccine: a calculation of relative risk reduction…

  222. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    @Reginald Selkirk #79, @Brony #285:
    One could just, not let them pretend they’ve even communicated a position to refute.

    RationalWiki – Ignosticism

    “We have no clear concept of anything labeled ‘God’ and/or how to test a clear concept of God.” In fact, there is no evidence that anyone has a clear idea of God or how to test for its existence either.
    […]
    The answer is invariably that “does God exist” is a non-question not worth taking seriously until someone, some day, comes along with a clear, non-outlandish, and falsifiable concept.
    […]
    In general, those rare times when falsifiable definitions of God are given, they are easily falsified. Experience shows that for the majority of God debates, the conversations are pointless and time-wasting.

  223. says

    Bundy update:

    I have to confess that I missed this bit of news with regards to the right wing extremist Ammon Bundy and his legal troubles. It’s extremely confusing, but Bundy had been arrested on a contempt of court warrant for his actions after the FIRST TRIAL involving defamation against St Luke’s Hospital. Bundy lost that defamation suit, and the court awarded damages of $52 million dollars to St Luke’s. As I pointed out previously, Bundy failed to comply with the court orders, but I missed that St Luke’s took Bundy to court A SECOND TIME(!) and got him ARRESTED! Bundy made bail, and it is then he did a runner.

    Yes, there is another arrest warrant out for Ammon Bundy. This is all very Trumpian. And if you are confused, it’s because this is SOP for right wing crooks.

    […] Bundy “sold” his home to a one of his friend’s for $250,000 and paid “rent” to him. By the way, the home is 4, 760 square feet. Anyway, Bundy gave St Luke’s and the judge the middle finger. This is when St Luke’s took him back to court, and the judge ordered Bundy’s arrest. […]

    […] Bundy said he felt attacked.

    “The largest corporation in Idaho is attacking me because I’m exposing them. … I do not see how I could go up against this monster in court,” Bundy said.

    Boo hoo hoo. Typical Trumpian projection going on here. This from the man who sicced a mob on the hospital. Bundy claimed that St Luke’s was involved in child sex trafficking, and the mob attacked the hospital. This was because one of Bundy’s supporters grandkid ended up in the emergency room, and the hospital contacted child protective services because the child was malnourished and dehydrated.

    Now, it turns out that Bundy was going to go through a second trial over this issue, but this time the issue was contempt of court. But guess what happened next? [News from last summer:] Bundy has a new warrant out for his arrest after skipping the first day of his court trial.

    Bundy and Rodirguez did not attend the two-week jury trial in July[…] “Once again, Mr. Bundy thinks he can simply say he does not need to be in court. Again, that is not how the rule of law works in this country,” Baskin said.

    […] Bundy did appear in court in August after he was arrested on contempt of court charges.

    So this is where you can get lost. Because Bundy decided to quit the first contempt of court trial, he now will have to have ANOTHER CONTEMPT OF COURT TRIAL! And it appears this is both a criminal and civil contempt trial. And if they ever find the asshole and keep him in jail for the trial, Bundy could get up to six months in jail if convicted.

    So to summarize:
    – Bundy harassed and sicced a mob on St Luke’s Hospital. The hospital sued Bundy for defamation, and he lost big time.
    – Bundy tried to hide his assets by selling his home and violate the court orders from the defamation trial.
    – St Luke’s took him back to court for his contempt of court, and Bundy got arrested.
    – Bundy posted bail, and he decided to do a runner instead of participating in the new trial.
    – The court has now issued an arrest warrent for Bundy for a second contempt of court trial.

    Link

    Okay then, Bundy is still a criminal, and Bundy is in a hole and still digging. I bet he is found and jailed soon.

  224. says

    […] You just can’t get good help these days. These guys took the money and ran.
    [Tweet and images at the link]

    💰 Earning money in the Russian Army. How eight Nepalese “dumped” the Ministry of Defense and fled from the Northern Military District ‼️🤣🤣🤣

    “I think it’s no secret to anyone that you can meet not only citizens of the Russian Federation in the Northern Military District. In places there are inhabitants of Central and South America, Central Asia or Africa . Some are interested in a Russian residence permit or a Russian citizen passport. But most go for money that they cannot earn at home, despite the risk to life and health.

    The case that I’m going to tell you about today is unique, since it’s not often in the northeast district that you can meet residents of such a distant country as Nepal .

    The heroes of our story are eight residents of the Republic of Nepal who came to Russia in search of work . They crossed the Russian border on October 14, 2023 .

    In early November, while in Moscow, they signed a contract with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, agreeing to take part in the Northern Military District. Then they were distributed to one of the units of the 58th Combined Arms Army of the Russian Federation (military unit 47084, North Ossetia) .

    Their names (arranged according to numbering in the photo):
    1. Khadka Chetendra , born April 29, 1979, private, grenade launcher;
    2. Adhikari Yubraj , born 10/06/1979, private, machine gunner;
    3. Bishwakarma Lal Bahadur , born 05/08/1983, private, senior rifleman;
    4. Bishwakarma Tilak Bahadur , born 08/05/1989, private, machine gunner;
    5. Khadka Deepak , born July 26, 1998, private, grenade launcher;
    6. Bhattarai Laxman , born July 26, 1982, private, machine gunner;
    7. Pahadi Jagadish , born July 22, 1984, private, senior rifleman;
    8. Rahapal Sushant Kumar , born June 17, 1992, private, rifleman.

    Each of them received 195 thousand rubles , which are issued upon the initial signing of a contract with the RF Armed Forces. Moreover, they even managed to be delivered to the unit located in the Rostov region.

    However, the heroes of our story decided that “bird in hand” was better, and they did not intend to risk their lives.

    Without spending even two weeks in service, on the night of November 16-17, 2023, eight Nepalese escaped from the unit’s location. A search has been announced. They are charged with Art. 337 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation – unauthorized abandonment of a unit.

    As of December 1, 2023, they were never found. They are probably already outside the territory of the Russian Federation.

    Such a success story from Nepalese expats.

    Photos of failed contract workers below 👇.

    Link. Scroll down to view.

    Funny.

  225. says

    @Lynna, OM, #298:

    I remember when we were told — by the same people now pushing these rape claims, Hillary Clinton and, in fact, a bunch of Israelis who claimed to have inside information! — that Gaddafi’s troops were taking Viagra so they could rape more effectively, and so all feminists had to be in favor of the invasion of Libya. Then, after the invasion, that claim was debunked and Hillary Clinton never spoke of it again and the Israelis who had made the claim admitted that they had made it up. And then there was the claim that Hamas had beheaded 40 babies on October 7, which rapidly became a claim that Hamas had killed 40 babies, which rapidly became an admission that 1 baby had been found dead after October 7, but that the IDF could not rule out having killed it themselves. (Biden lied outright that he had seen footage of the 40 beheaded babies, and has never admitted it was a lie, incidentally. That’s the kind of integrity the Democrats are showing these days.) And there was the admission that at least some of the deaths at the music festival were caused by Israeli helicopters firing indiscriminately — of which the footage has now “gone missing”, and Israel has decided to literally bury the cars which were parked nearby “to show respect” so they will no longer be available as evidence of the direction of fire. And then there was the admission that at least half the initial body count we were supposed to find so horrifying was made up of Palestinians and active-duty IDF, not Israeli civilians, even ignoring the fact that some portion of the civilian deaths were caused by the IDF. And there are Israeli eyewitnesses who have come forward saying the IDF ground troops were firing on Israelis. And then, just a couple of days ago, the NYT reported that Israel knew the attack was coming as much as a year before it happened — which means that they deliberately sacrificed all the people who died at the music festival (which was encouraged to extend to October 7 by the Israeli authorities).

    Here is some better-written text a Twitter thread (Musk wants us to call it X, so call it Twitter) by user RotaryCup:

    You’re seeing an obvious coordinated effort to disseminate propaganda about mass sexual violence from 2 months ago. Notice the complete lack of mention of alleged crimes against babies/children now. Those headlines have disappeared because they were falsifiable; these are not.

    Anonymous/nameless allegations of mass rape are not falsifiable and that’s the point: you’re not meant to have an opportunity to scrutinize evidence because even expressing scepticism makes you anti-Semitic, a rape apologist, or a weirdo who wants to look at graphic footage.

    These are the same tactics which were used to sell every military conflict since 9/11, being used by the same totally unethical warmongers who sold all those conflicts, and people like you have failed to recognize a very obvious pattern. It’s an open-book test, and you’re still failing. I almost wish I believed in an afterlife, because there is no punishment strong enough for the people who are supporting this genocide — as Lord Vetinari said in Terry Pratchett’s later book Snuff, how could we build a scaffold high enough to hang them from, given the punishments we give for more common crimes which do less harm?

  226. says

    Vicar @304. I am waiting for more information.

    In related news, NBC reports:

    The Israeli military announced it was expanding its ground assault against Hamas to all of the Gaza Strip, following the collapse of the truce deal that saw more than 100 hostages and 240 Palestinian prisoners freed.

    New York Times:

    Up to 1.8 million Gazans — around 80 percent of the population — have been forced to leave their homes since Israel began its bombardment in response to Hamas’s attack on Oct. 7. That number is expected to rise after Israel issued a new evacuation order on Saturday for areas in the south.

    Associated Press:

    Ballistic missiles fired by Yemen’s Houthi rebels struck three commercial ships Sunday in the Red Sea, while a U.S. warship shot down three drones in self-defense during the hourslong assault, the U.S. military said. The Iranian-backed Houthis claimed two of the attacks.

  227. says

    NBC News:

    India’s space aspirations show no signs of slowing, as the country strengthens cooperation with the United States on a slew of upcoming science and human spaceflight missions. The partnerships between the U.S. and India’s space agency, the Indian Space Research Organization, were part of a key visit to the country last week by NASA Administrator Bill Nelson.

  228. says

    This is a fascinating story amidst the general tragedy and bleak carnage of the last two months. Two scholars analyzed trading in the days just before the October 7th massacres in southern Israel and put together a pretty strong case that someone essentially shorted the Israeli economy based on foreknowledge of the attacks. Specially they tracked short selling of an exchange traded fund which gave investors broad exposure to the Israeli economy.

    I’m far from an expert on this topic of this kind of analysis. So perhaps someone with greater technical knowledge could find gaps in the argument. But it seems pretty convincing: short-selling just in advance of October 7th that greatly exceeded what had been seen during various crises over the last twenty years – COVID, the great recession, various Israeli wars and domestic crises. If you’re a Haaretz subscriber they have a detailed write-up here. You can also read the paper published at SSRN here.

    As we’ve learned recently, Israel had a decent amount of advance intelligence on an attack something like the one that happened on October.7th. Most of that intelligence was disregarded in the belief that Hamas lacked the capacity to mount an attack on that scale and also because it was widely believed that Hamas hoped for a sustained period of “quiet” with Israel. But the exact date of the planning would have been a closely guarded secret. It seems likely that the trades were placed by someone with various tightly held knowledge of Hamas’s plans.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/did-hamas-short-the-israeli-economy

  229. says

    House GOPer Moves To Cut Off Pension Benefits For Ousted Members

    […] Today we learned that expelled-Rep. George Santos (R-NY) is using the website Cameo to sell videos for cash now that he no longer has a congressional salary and has been accused of, among many other things, misappropriating campaign funds to bankroll his expensive taste.

    Inspired by Santos’ shamelessness, it appears a former colleague in the House may be taking legislative action to cut off some financial benefits for expelled members in the future.

    Rep. Zach Nunn (R-IA), one of 100-plus Republicans who voted to expel Santos from Congress last week, introduced the Congressional Pension Accountability Act on Monday, which would block lawmakers who are expelled from Congress from accessing a congressional pension. While Santos is not entitled to a pension because a member, typically, must serve five or more years to be eligible, Nunn said it was necessary to have a “road map” for the future.

    “No one should be serving in Congress, be excommunicated and removed from Congress, and still be able to draw a pension,” Nunn said at a press briefing Monday. “A pension is earned for honorable service. When you’re removed from office … you should not be able to continue to cash in on the American taxpayer’s dime.” […]

    George Santos posted a tweet: “The truth will set me free! ❤️🙏🏽”

  230. says

    Zelensky will brief senators Tuesday ahead of key vote on military aid

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will address senators at a classified briefing Tuesday via a secure video conference feed, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced.

    Zelensky will brief senators on the state of the war in Ukraine and the need for another round of military aid a day before the Senate is scheduled to vote on proceeding to the legislative vehicle for a $106 billion emergency foreign aid package that includes more than $61 billion for Ukraine.

    “The administration has invited President Zelensky to address senators … as part of our classified briefing tomorrow so we can hear directly from him precisely what’s at stake in this vote,” Schumer announced on the Senate floor. “I ask that all senators — all senators — attend this important briefing.”

    Zelensky warned senators at a closed-door meeting in the Old Senate Chamber in September that Ukraine would lose its war with Russia without more aid from the United States.

    Schumer filed cloture Monday evening on a motion to proceed to the shell bill that will carry the supplemental foreign aid package.

    The final details of the package are still being worked out. It’s being held up by a disagreement between the two parties about adding immigration and asylum policy reforms to reduce the flow of migrants across the U.S.-Mexico border.

  231. says

    Sanders opposed to sending $10B to ‘extremist Netanyahu government’ in Israel

    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), one of the Senate’s most prominent progressives, on Monday stated his opposition to sending $10.1 billion to the “Netanyahu government to continue its current offensive military approach,” lambasting the siege and assault of Gaza as “immoral.”

    “I do not think we should be appropriating $10.1 billion for the right-wing, extremist Netanyahu government to continue its current military approach. What the Netanyahu government is doing is immoral, it is in violation of international law, and the United States should not be complicit in those actions,” Sanders argued on the Senate floor.

    […] “I believe it is appropriate to support defensive systems that will protect Israeli civilians against incoming missile and rockets attacks, but I believe that it would be absolutely irresponsible to provide an additional $10.1 billion in unconditional military aid that will allow the Netanyahu government to continue its current offensive military approach,” he said. […]

  232. KG says

    The Vicar@304,
    Systematic rape in war is unfortunately very common – I’ll reserve judgement on allegations it took place during the Hamas attack. We do know that both Hamas and Israel have carried out deliberate and systematic war crimes duirng this war – taking civilian hostages on Hamas’s side, mass murder of civilians on Israel’s. I don’t regard it as proven that the Israeli authorities deliberately allowed the October 7th attack – arrogant disbelief that Hamas was capable of carrying out such an attack, and the “need” to use the IDF to support further land theft on the West Bank are an alternative explanation. What is most significant in this regard, if it stands up to further examination, is the “short selling of an exchange traded fund which gave investors broad exposure to the Israeli economy.” (Lynna, OM@107 quoting TPM), which would indicate knowledge of the actual date of the forthcoming attack by people outwith Hamas. “Follow the money”, as usual.

  233. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 310

    What the Netanyahu government is doing is immoral, it is in violation of international law, and the United States should not be complicit in those actions…”

    Since when has morality ever stopped the U.S. from backing fascist governments in the name of its own “interests” (i.e. money and power)?

    Besides, Bernie. Didn’t you get the memo? The Civilized world has finally decided to let the Israeli’s commit a genocide of its own. It’s only fair.

  234. StevoR says

    What is it with horrible people who seem tohave gotten away with stuff suing for defamation here in Oz? Fiorts Bne Roberts Smith (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Roberts-Smith#Judgment ) then the disgusting Bruce Lehrmann ( https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/seven/103186256 ) and now hateful, electorally rejected transphobe Moira Deeming! Will they ever learn? :

    ictorian MP Moira Deeming has lodged a defamation lawsuit against her former boss and state Liberal leader John Pesutto in the Federal Court. Ms Deeming had long threatened defamation action against Mr Pesutto amid a public and protracted dispute following her attendance at an anti-trans rights rally earlier in the year. The upper house member for Western Metropolitan had served for less than four months when she attended the Let Women Speak rally on the steps of Parliament House in March. That event was gatecrashed by neo-Nazis. Mr Pesutto moved to expel her from the party room following that event, citing her association with the organisers of the rally, who he said had links to neo-Nazis. She was instead suspended for nine months, before being ousted from the parliamentary party in May.

    After months of attempted mediation failed, Ms Deeming is now seeking aggravated damages from Mr Pesutto for alleged defamation in the wake of the event.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-05/moira-deeming-lodges-defamation-suit-john-pesutto/103125656

    Be nice if our criminal courts delivered as ethical and actual justice “justice” as our our civil ones here. Sigh.

    Of course, also be nice if we maybe look at defamation and press freedom laws some as well..

  235. says

    WTF?

    Speaker Johnson said Republicans are blurring faces in Jan. 6 footage “because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ.”

    At a Capitol Hill press conference last week, House Speaker Mike Johnson boasted to reporters, “We are the rule-of-law team.” The Louisiana Republican quickly added, “The Republican Party stands for the rule of law.”

    The quote came to mind anew this morning. HuffPost reported:

    House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Tuesday that Republicans are blurring faces in security footage from inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to protect rioters from prosecution. “We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” Johnson said at a press conference.

    Oh my.

    […] a couple of months into his tenure as House speaker, Republican Rep. Kevin McCarthy thought it’d be a good idea to give Tucker Carlson exclusive access to Jan. 6 security camera footage. The results were predictable: The host, before his departure from Fox News, cherry-picked footage that allowed him to tell the deceptive story he set out to tell, sparking outrage from both parties and law enforcement.

    Nearly 10 months later, McCarthy’s successor decided it was time to go a step further: Johnson released thousands of hours of security footage to the public. The results were again predictable: As a New York Times report recently explained, the move has “fueled a renewed effort by Republican lawmakers and far-right activists to rewrite the history of the attack that day and exonerate the pro-Trump rioters who took part.”

    […] “As you know,” Johnson told reporters, “we have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ and to have other concerns and problems.”

    In other words, the Republican Party’s most powerful official is concerned that if law enforcement saw the unmodified footage, the Justice Department might see evidence of criminal misconduct. In order to prevent possible accountability, Johnson and the House GOP are taking deliberate steps to obscure the identities of those who entered the Capitol during the Jan. 6 attack.

    It’s almost as if Johnson didn’t tell the truth last week when with his boast about Republicans being “the rule-of-law team.”

    HuffPost’s report added that while federal prosecutors have long had access to Jan. 6 security footage, “blurring people’s faces could prevent amateur investigators from sending tips to the FBI. Online sleuths have previously used social media and facial recognition software to help the government track down a number of suspects.”

  236. says

    Republicans imperil Ukraine aid with inflexible border demands

    […] Today, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, at the behest of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and President Joe Biden, will address senators via video conference at a classified briefing. The point is simple: The Ukrainian leader will make clear to lawmakers that U.S. military aid is absolutely necessary.

    But if the need is great, the crisis is now, and leaders of both parties are willing to support our allies in the midst of a deadly war, what’s the problem? The answer is that Republicans will only approve aid to Ukraine if Democrats agree to a series of far-right border policies.

    To be sure, there’s no connection between the war in Ukraine and domestic immigration. But GOP lawmakers believe they have leverage, effectively telling Democrats that Republicans will let Ukraine suffer unless the GOP gets the border measures they want.

    This isn’t altogether new: Republicans first presented this ultimatum a month ago, sparking detailed bipartisan negotiations. What is new is that those talks appear to have collapsed. NBC News reported:

    Republicans have vowed to filibuster Biden’s aid package unless Democrats agree to tighten U.S. asylum and parole laws in immigration proceedings. But bipartisan negotiations on a border policy deal, led by Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., faltered on Friday amid deep disagreements between the two parties, according to congressional aides with knowledge of the talks.

    As The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent reported last week, Democrats have already made a series of concessions in the hopes of reaching an agreement. GOP senators have not responded in kind — and it’s important to understand why.

    “I think there’s a misunderstanding on the part of Senator Schumer and some of our Democratic friends,” Republican Sen. John Cornyn told NBC News. “This is not a traditional negotiation, where we expect to come up with a bipartisan compromise on the border. This is a price that has to be paid in order to get the supplemental.”

    The Texan’s candor was illuminating. For these GOP senators, there is no give and take. These talks are not designed to be constructive policy negotiations in which both sides make concessions and work towards a common goal.

    Republicans, in the dynamic they’ve created for themselves, are not playing the role of policymakers. Rather, they want and expect to be seen as hostage-takers. They haven’t presented Democrats with an idea to be explored; they’ve handed Democrats a list of demands they expect to be met.

    Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut told Politico that in exchange for aid to Ukraine, “Republicans are insisting on policies that would ‘essentially close the border’ and eliminate asylum for people with meritorious claims.”

    Just so we’re clear, GOP leaders, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, actually want Ukraine to receive the support. I emphasize this because it creates a dynamic in which Republicans expect to get what they want in exchange for something else that Republicans also want.

    What’s more, it’s not just the Senate: House Speaker Mike Johnson has also told the White House that Ukraine is “dependent upon“ Democrats approving the far-right border policies the GOP wants.

    Schumer declared on the Senate floor yesterday afternoon, “Democrats want to be reasonable on immigration, and we are willing to make concessions. But we will not keep going in circles if Republicans aren’t interested in even meeting us halfway.”

    In response, GOP officials have already said they have no intention of meeting Democrats halfway. I can only imagine how pleased Russia’s Vladimir Putin is with the Republicans’ tactics.

  237. says

    Excerpts from live coverage of FBI Director Wray testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee:

    […] Senator John Kennedy says the problems with the FBI have come out of the Washington office. This is odd, considering that two Republicans devoted their entire time to screaming about a memo from low-level analysts in a single field office.

    Kennedy then asks Wray to talk about who made the decision to “raid” Mar-a-Lago. Wray points out that this would be a violation of just the kind that Kennedy just accused Comey. Wray talks in general terms about the need to use search warrants.

    […] after the first two Republicans to speak, every Republican has just sought the opportunity to talk about how much they don’t like the FBI.

    […] Hawley’s smugness and sneering is just beyond belief. This is something even Fox News would be embarrassed to run. He’s playing directly for a Newsmax / OAN audience.

    […] Senator Josh Hawley then tries to conflate a case in which someone who was piling up weapons, including Molotov cocktails, where the FBI asked people who knew them—including their priest—about the suspect. Hawley is now screaming at Wray about how many “choir directors” they have questioned.

    The smarminess of Hawley’s performance is hard to capture.

    […] We’re back with Sen. Mazie Hirono [Democrat] asking about human tracking and about the high levels of crimes against indigenous people.

    Wray talks about programs that are both designed to both track down criminals and rescue victims. Hirono mentioned six rescued people in what was a very friendly chat.

    […] Ted Cruz wins the award for being the first to bring up Hunter Biden. In fact, he doesn’t seem to be interested in hearing from Wray at all. He’s just sitting there reading out-of-context text excerpts and making claims about special counsel David Weiss. We’re going to just be treated to Cruz using his “I’m disgusted voice” for the next ten minutes.

    […] Now Cruz has moved into his screaming and shouting phase. “It’s not an ongoing investigation! You’re not doing the work!” Now saying that Merrick Garland has lied under oath and that he needs to be arrested.

    Cruz calls for his staffers to hold up a chart. Except they forgot the chart.

    Cruz is still screaming at Wray. “You’re simply sitting blithely by” while partisan Democrats yada, yada, yada. More screaming.

    Particularly hilarious is that Cruz keeps screaming about the idea the FBI might have notified Hunter Biden before searching a storage unit when that’s exactly what they did before the search of Mar-a-Lago.

    Five-minute break. Good chance that Cruz and Lee will now depart, having completed their camera time.

    […] Sen. Mike Lee launches into a bizarre case in which an FBI analyst reportedly searched through data to see if his father was having an affair.

    Wray, questioned about this, seems to have never heard of it. But Lee charges on. In the middle of one question, Wray notes that Lee is actually asking him about an NSA analyst, forcing Lee to hop to “if they had been FBI” would they be fired?

    Mike Lee is full-bore screaming now. “You have a lot of gall, sir! … This is why we have a Constitution, sir, and you must comply with it!”

    Mike Lee [Republican from Utah] goes into fluttering fury as Wray tries to defend 702.

    “You’re asking me to believe something that is not believable, because you have made it unbelievable, and I refuse to accept it.”

    Ladies and gentlemen, that would be the closing line of the Mike Lee Show for today.

    [….] Sen. Chris Coons is up and starts off by saying he hasn’t made his mind up on 702. He asks Wray about a bill put forward by Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Marco Rubio that would forbid using 702 data in connection to a domestic crime without a court order, but would still allow its use to handle foreign intelligence without a warrant or order.

    Wray doesn’t seem to think this is too bad a compromise.

    […] Coons isn’t saying it explicitly, but the subtext here is that if Trump gets in, what protections are there that keep 702 data from being used to chase down anyone who dares speak up. Especially if Trump puts a MAGA zealot in charge of the FBI.

    […] Klobuchar asks Wray to talk to the effects of social media.

    Wray says there has been an increase in hate crimes, with a 60% increase in already high numbers since October 7.

    […] Now Sen. Chuck Grassley is up and talking about what he calls the “Richmond field office anti-Catholic memo” and claims that two other offices were involved.

    This is a conspiracy theory that has been played up by both Jim Jordan and Mike Johnson have been playing up in the House and which has become one of the articles Republicans in the House are going to in their “defund the FBI” campaign.

    Grassley asks a question, Wray answers, and then Grassley pretends that Wray agreed with him when he didn’t. Grassley is just going to go on with this no matter what Wray says.

    […] Wray says the biggest use of 702 is in preventing and addressing cyberattacks.

    […] Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse starts off talking about Charles McGonigal, the FBI agent in charge of the New York office back in 2016 who is now under federal indictment for money laundering, lying to the FBI, and violating sanctions against Russia.

    […] Wray is spending a lot of time talking about the need for warrantless surveillance in fighting cybercrime.

    “Stripping the FBI of its 702 authority would be a form of unilateral disarmament.” That’s going to be Wray’s theme of the day. […]

    Link

    So that’s how the hearing is going. Democrats try to get answers regarding substantive issues, and Republicans grandstand and yell a lot so that they’ll get a video replay on Fox News or other rightwing media.

  238. says

    The media may be waking up to the threat of Donald Trump

    There are no more dog whistles. No code words. No efforts to hide the truth. When it comes to democracy, Republicans are against it. [video at the link]

    That little nugget may have been just one of the endless series of mistakes, slip-ups, and misstatements that the media seems willing to overlook when it comes to Donald Trump. But even if that’s the case, you don’t have to go far to understand what Trump has in mind for America. There’s “Agenda47,” where Trump promises to expand the death penalty, end birthright citizenship, and create giant “tent cities” for homeless people. And there’s the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which lays out plans to destroy the Department of Justice and replace tens of thousands of career federal employees with conservatives pledged to Trump’s will.

    But this past week, it seems that major media outlets woke up enough to realize that whistling past the Chancellery may not be the best idea.

    As The New York Times reported on Monday, Trump’s plan for moving the country into authoritarian control is now more sophisticated, and the systems that are supposed to safeguard democracy have all been weakened. It’s not that Trump hasn’t always been a radical fan of authoritarian rule.

    “When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it,” Donald J. Trump said in an interview with Playboy magazine the year after the massacre. “Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak.”

    [Wow]

    It’s just that the first time around, Trump seemed unprepared for the idea that he couldn’t just step into the Oval Office and begin enjoying the despotic freedom of a Kim Jong Un or Vladimir Putin. This time, Trump and his allies seem to be pulling out all the stops to ensure that there are no stops.

    Not only has Trump been mimicking the language of the Nazi Party in describing his opponents as “vermin” and fretting that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country,” he’s also making it clear that he intends to take actions lifted from Germany circa 1939.

    Republicans have made the idea of invading Mexico practically a requirement for being a candidate in 2024, and Trump has sworn to get that done. Besides getting a little American lebensraum, Trump has also threatened to send military forces to take control of “Democratic cities.” Which would be all but three of America’s 20 largest cities and almost two-thirds of the top 100.

    Meanwhile, the whole Republican system of institutes and foundations has reshaped itself into a tool for wielding power in a second Trump term. In Congress, Trump has “worn down, outlasted, intimidated into submission or driven out” any Republican not willing to bend the knee, according to the Times. And when it comes to staff, Trump has lined up a prospective cabinet and collection of staffers all of whom know the only word the boss wants to hear is “yes.” None of them is going to get in Trump’s way or try to talk him down from illegal action.

    Last Thursday, it was The Washington Post with an op-ed about not the possibility, but the probability of a Trump dictatorship during a second term. That article includes a warning that as bad as the political rhetoric is now, it’s about to get worse. […]

    As soon as it’s clear Trump is the Republican nominee, no one should hold on to a fantasy that anyone will stand up to oppose him. The other candidates are already out there on the hustings, trying to run against Trump without really running against Trump. It’s a stage trick that all of them seem to think is necessary, but it’s also one that dooms them from the outset.

    Trump will roll into the fall as the guy who has once more “united his party,” as every Republican who gets in front of a microphone does their best to find new ways to garner attention by voicing even greater support and admiration. All of this will be reported as “momentum.”

    The Post points out that when voters in Weimar Germany turned to Adolf Hitler, they did so in a period of disgust with their messy and ineffective democratic government. For decades, Republicans have been the party of political dysfunction, and they’ve raised their ineptness to high art in the past year—but there’s no reason to think that voters will be selective in expressing their distaste. “Throw all the bums out” is an expression even more common than “Let’s get ourselves a strong man who gets things done.”

    Right now, a strong majority of voters say they are worried about democracy. No one should assume that just because Republicans are the problem, they will pay the cost. And The Washington Post op-ed points out a critical piece of the puzzle: If Trump wins the election, it will be because he has already shown the justice system holds no power over him. Why should he ever fear the law—any law—again?

    Maybe it wouldn’t help if The New York Times and The Washington Post ran such articles every day. Maybe it wouldn’t help if all the rest of the media joined in.

    But it certainly wouldn’t hurt.

  239. says

    Ukraine Update: Zelenskyy lobbies Republicans blocking aid to Ukraine

    President Zelenskyy is unable to attend the classified briefings, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Tuesday. National security staff and Stefanchuk will still brief members. [uh-oh, bad news]

    […] The supplemental funding bill coming to the floor as soon as Wednesday includes $60 billion in aid for Ukraine.

    […] House Speaker Mike Johnson countered the White House’s letter sent Monday warning that time and money is running out for Ukraine assistance with a missive of his own. Further assistance to Ukraine, he wrote, is “dependent upon enactment of transformative change to our nation’s border security laws.” He remains insistent that it’s the House’s racist immigration bill or nothing.

    That’s the kind of digging in that could doom Ukraine, and unfortunately it’s been embraced by some Senate Republicans, like Sen. John Cornyn. He and his fellow Republicans are not actually negotiating this, he told NBC News. There’s no “negotiation” about it. “I think there’s a misunderstanding on the part of Senator Schumer and some of our Democratic friends,” Cornyn said. “This is not a traditional negotiation, where we expect to come up with a bipartisan compromise on the border. This is a price that has to be paid in order to get the supplemental.”

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer seized on that statement Tuesday morning. “What that Republican said, Mr. President, is the textbook definition of hostage-taking,” he said in his floor speech opening the session. “If funding for Ukraine fails, the failure will solely be on the Republican Party.”

    Some Republicans seem to recognize that. In fact, there’s some disagreement among Senate Republicans, and between them and the House GOP. Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford, who’s been leading the talks for Republicans, insists that talks and negotiations are continuing, though Democrats dispute that as well. “We continue to work to find a solution that will protect our national security, stop the human trafficking and prevent the cartels from exploiting the obvious loopholes in our law,” he tweeted Tuesday. “That is the goal & we will continue to work until we get it right.”

    Lankford also dismissed Johnson’s demand that the Senate and the White House have to swallow the House immigration bill whole. “H.R. 2 didn’t get a single Democrat vote in the House,” Lankford told Punch Bowl News. “I have to get 20 Democrat votes here [in the Senate]. If the House is going to say it has to be our bill that we got zero Democrats on but I need you to go get 20 over in your body, that’s not rational. That’s not how things work.”

    Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, another Republican who’s been involved in the talks, agreed. “That’s good—he’ll get what we send him,” Tillis responded when asked about Johnson’s position.

    They both need to have a word with Cornyn, and also with Zelenskyy, before time runs out for Ukraine.

  240. says

    Tuberville releasing hold on hundreds of military promotions

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) announced on Tuesday that he is ending his months-long blockade on hundreds of military promotions.

    Tuberville said that he is jumping on board with an idea presented by Sens. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) and Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) that would release all of his holds on military officers at the 3-star level and below.

    A hold will remain in place for the roughly ten nominations for 4-star generals and officers.

    […] Tuberville expressed no regrets about how he handled matters throughout the blockade, though conceded that he didn’t get the “win that we wanted. […] We’ve still got the bad [abortion] policy.”

  241. says

    Fox News Was Honest About Election For Literally One Second And Steve Bannon Is So Mad

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/fox-news-was-honest-about-election

    […] Donald Trump was doing one of his Hitler rallies this weekend, and as he started to babble incoherently about the 2020 election being RIGGED AND STOLLEN, Fox News cut away like yeah fuck this. The anchor, Arthel Neville, came back and did an a cappella cover version of her uncle Aaron Neville’s famous duet with Linda Ronstadt, singing “I DON’T KNOW MUUUUUCH, but I know Donald Trump is full of shit when he says the election was stolen, and THAT MAY BEEEEE ALL I NEED TO KNOW.”

    It was good enough.

    Neville explained that Trump had said “many untruths,” and indeed corrected his lies about the election. [video at the link]

    Is Fox News to be credited for turning over a new leaf, or is this just something the network feels pressured to do after that nearly a billion dollar Dominion Voting settlement? Mysteries! […]

    Steve Bannon is real mad about it […] Bannon, who every day looks more like somebody’s butch grandmother who was nice enough to organize the bake sale to pay for the junior high band trip to All State — IYKYK — had himself a right conniption: [video at the link]

    STEVE BANNON: It’s a disgrace — you saw Fox, what they did of President Trump’s speech, they cut in right — or they right away when he said — eh, he didn’t lose the 2020 election. Oh no, you’re totally incorrect, and we don’t care if you wrote a $800 million dollar check, or a billion dollar check, two billion dollar check to keep the demon father of all this, Murdoch, himself from being humiliated on the stand. Which just reinforced all the other problems people have to do with trying to get this right.

    The supervisors in Cochise County are heroes. You at Fox, TV for stupid people, are cowards. And for you to cut in on Trump in Iowa and say that crap, shows you everything you want to know about what you guys are. OK? Just like that debate with Newsom and DeSantis last week, and Hannity should be ashamed of himself. Absolute disgrace. Everything they do is to try to stop Trump, or stop some aspect of Trump.

    Okeydoke.

    Hannity should be ashamed of himself and Arthel Neville should be ashamed […]

  242. Reginald Selkirk says

    Research Finds That Renting Ages You Faster Than Smoking, Obesity

    schwit1 shares a report from the New York Post:

    A landmark study out of the University of Adelaide and University of Essex has found that living in a private rental property accelerates the biological aging process by more than two weeks every year. The research found renting had worse effects on biological age than being unemployed (adding 1.4 weeks per year), obesity (adding 1 week per year), or being a former smoker (adding about 1.1 weeks). University of Adelaide Professor of Housing Research Emma Baker said private renting added “about two-and-a-half weeks of aging” per year to a person’s biological clock, compared to those who own their homes…

  243. Reginald Selkirk says

    Gold bars featured in Sen. Bob Menendez bribery case are linked to a 2013 robbery, records show

    Four gold bars connected to the FBI search of Sen. Bob Menendez’s home have direct links to a New Jersey businessman now accused of bribing Menendez, the state’s senior senator, Bergen County prosecutor’s records from a 2013 robbery case show.

    The businessman, Fred Daibes, reported to police that he was the victim of an armed robbery in 2013, and he asked police to recover the gold bars stolen from him. Daibes reported that $500,000 in cash and 22 gold bars were stolen, Edgewater, New Jersey, police records show. Police later caught four people with the stolen goods.

    To get his property back, Daibes signed “property release forms” certifying the gold bars belonged to him, the records show.

    “Each gold bar has its own serial number,” Daibes told investigators in a 2013 transcript made by prosecutors and police who recovered — and returned to Daibes — the stolen valuables. “They’re all stamped…you’ll never see two stamped the same way.” …

  244. Reginald Selkirk says

    Catholic nuns sue Smith & Wesson to halt its assault-style weapons sales

    A group of Catholic nuns on Tuesday sued the board of Smith & Wesson to try to force the gunmaker to abandon the manufacture, marketing and sales of assault-style rifles that have been used in U.S. mass shootings.

    The nuns, in a lawsuit filed in state court in Nevada, allege that Smith & Wesson’s directors and senior management exposed the company to significant liability by intentionally violating federal, state and local laws and failing to respond to lawsuits over mass shootings…

    The group of nuns filed the lawsuit in their role as Smith & Wesson shareholders, in what is known as a derivative lawsuit. Such lawsuits seek to hold corporate boards liable for breaches of their duties to shareholders, although courts generally find boards are protected from lawsuits for good-faith decisions…

  245. Reginald Selkirk says

    ‘Wobbly Spacetime’ May Help Resolve Contradictory Physics Theories

    Scientists have proposed a framework that they say could unify quantum mechanics and Albert Einstein’s theory of general relatively. “Quantum theory and Einstein’s theory of general relativity are mathematically incompatible with each other, so it’s important to understand how this contradiction is resolved,” said Prof Jonathan Oppenheim, a physicist at University College London, who is behind the theory. The Guardian reports:

    Until now, the prevailing assumption has been that Einstein’s theory of gravity must be modified, or “quantized,” in order to fit within quantum theory. This is the approach of string theory, which advances the view that spacetime comprises 10, 11 or possibly 26 dimensions. Another leading candidate, advanced by Rovelli and others, is loop quantum gravity, in which spacetime is composed of finite loops woven into an extremely fine fabric. Oppenheim’s theory, published in the journal Physical Review X, challenges the consensus by suggesting that spacetime may be classical and not governed by quantum theory at all. This means spacetime, however closely you zoomed in on it, would be smooth and continuous rather than “quantized” into discrete units. However, Oppenheim introduces the idea that spacetime is also inherently wobbly, subject to random fluctuations that create an intrinsic breakdown in predictability…

  246. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 332

    No. I’m not going to say it.

    No… I won’t say it!

    FINE! “Wibbly-wobbly Timey-wimey.”

  247. birgerjohansson says

    Russia today: “We attacked the beachheads east3 of the river in the Cherson region and totally beat the Ukrainans but for reasons we had to make a tactical withdrawal .”

  248. Reginald Selkirk says

    Jack Smith’s New Evidence: Trump Tried to Start Yet Another Riot

    rosecutors with special counsel Jack Smith revealed Tuesday that they have proof an “agent” for Donald Trump tried to cause a riot in Michigan to stop the vote count in the 2020 presidential election.

    Smith indicted Trump in August for his role in the January 6 insurrection and other attempts to overturn the presidential election. Smith’s team said in a Tuesday court filing that an unindicted co-conspirator, identified only as “Campaign Employee” sent text messages on November 4, 2020, to an attorney working with Trump’s campaign at the TCF Center in Detroit, where ballots were being counted.

    “In the messages, the Campaign Employee encouraged rioting and other methods of obstruction when he learned that the vote count was trending in favor of the defendant’s opponent,” prosecutors said…

  249. says

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan has clearly found a new way to go after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. It’s less clear why.

    One of House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan’s favorite hobbies is launching investigations into investigations, though one specific probe appears to be the Ohio Republican’s personal favorite.

    Shortly after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis indicted Donald Trump, among several others, in August, Jordan started demanding answers about the prosecutor’s election-related case. Specifically, the Judiciary Committee chair seems to think that the Justice Department might have secretly conspired with Willis’ office as part of a nefarious plot against the former president.

    Jordan has literally no evidence to suggest Main Justice has anything to do with the Fulton County case, and Willis has written to the GOP congressman on several occasions in recent months, reminding him that he doesn’t appear to have any idea what he’s talking about.

    It was against this backdrop that Jordan decided this week to go after Willis’ case in a slightly different way. NBC News reported:

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan and a subcommittee chairman on the House Administration Committee announced Tuesday that they would be investigating any “cooperation” between Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis and the former House Jan. 6 committee.

    Evidently, Willis sent a letter two years ago to Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, who chaired the now-defunct Jan. 6 committee. Jordan now believes this is worthy of closer inspection by the Judiciary Committee: He asked Willis to turn over communications between her office and the bipartisan select panel that wrapped up its work last year.

    What’s more, it’s not just Jordan. Republican Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia, who’s spent quite a bit of time investigating the Jan. 6 committee’s investigation, sent a separate letter to Thompson this week, seeking related documents.

    So far, Willis hasn’t commented, while the Jan. 6 committee’s former chairman issued a statement complaining of the “significant factual errors” in Loudermilk’s request.

    Time will tell what becomes of this — I’d recommend keeping expectations low — and it’s probably inevitable that Jordan and his cohorts will soon find some other investigation to investigate.

    But what strikes me as especially odd about this line of inquiry is the apparent irrelevance of the underlying claim. At least when Jordan pressed Willis for answers over the summer, it was clear what he hoped to prove: The Ohio Republican had concocted a baseless conspiracy theory involving the Justice Department, and he pursued the matter accordingly.

    This new thread is more peculiar. Let’s say, hypothetically, that Fulton County’s district attorney’s office really was in close contact with the bipartisan Jan. 6 committee. Let’s also say, as part of this same hypothetical, that Willis relied on information collected by congressional investigators as part of her prosecutions.

    Why would that matter? What difference would it make if the Jan. 6 committee’s research proved useful to law enforcement? Jordan and Loudermilk appear to be seeking an answer to a boring question.

  250. says

    Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville has largely abandoned his blockade against military confirmations, but this is not an all’s-well-that-ends-well story.

    After largely abandoning his blockade against U.S. military confirmations, Sen. Tommy Tuberville was asked whether he had any regrets. “It was pretty much a draw,” the Alabama Republican said. “I mean, they didn’t get what they wanted. We didn’t get what we wanted.”

    I’d be curious to know more about how the far-right senator defines “draw.” Tuberville undermined his own country’s armed forces for 10 months because he didn’t want the Pentagon to provide travel reimbursements to U.S. troops who need reproductive care in red states. The GOP lawmaker said he’d continue to hurt the military until the Defense Department changed its policy.

    In response, the Pentagon failed to pay the ransom, and Tuberville ultimately backed down. “Draw” isn’t the first word that comes to mind.

    […] almost immediately after the Alabaman’s announcement, the Senate got to work. Politico reported:

    The Senate on Tuesday approved more than 400 promotions for senior military officers after Sen. Tommy Tuberville dropped his blockade of the nominations, breaking an unprecedented months-long impasse that has roiled the ranks. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer moved to quickly confirm the long list of promotions just hours after Tuberville backed off his hold of nominees for three-star posts and below.

    “Today, hundreds of military families across the country can breathe a sigh of relief,” Schumer declared in floor remarks. “The Senate has unanimously confirmed hundreds of military nominations that were held up for ten months by a single person, the Senator from Alabama. Thank God, these military officers will now get the promotions they so rightfully earned.

    […] As for the dozen or so officers up for four-star positions, whom Tuberville is continuing to block for some reason, the New York Democrat added in his remarks, “[W]e will work to confirm the rest of the nominees that were on hold very soon.”

    But there was something else that Schumer said that stood out for me. “The senior senator from Alabama has nothing to show for his 10 months of delay, no laws changing in any way, except for the damage he did to our military readiness and the pain caused to military families,” the majority leader said.

    It might be tempting to see this as an all’s-well-that-ends-well story, but it’s really not. Tuberville spent nearly a year undermining the armed forces without cause, and as recently as September, President Joe Biden’s nominee to be the Navy’s top officer, Adm. Lisa Franchetti, told the Senate Armed Services Committee about how long it will take for the military to recover from the Republican’s radical and unprecedented tactics.

    “Just at the three-star level, it would take about three to four months just to move all the people around,” Franchetti testified. “But it will take years to recover […]

    […] the Alabaman didn’t just needlessly hurt the military, he also did lasting harm to his own credibility and stature, in exchange for nothing.

    For his part, President Joe Biden issued a written statement celebrating the end of the blockade, while taking aim at Tuberville for “undermining military readiness and the morale of our troops.”

    The Democrat added, “In the end, this was all pointless. Senator Tuberville, and the Republicans who stood with him, needlessly hurt hundreds of servicemembers and military families and threatened our national security — all to push a partisan agenda. I hope no one forgets what he did.”

  251. says

    When key Team Trump insiders say the federal government will go after news organizations in 2025, the rhetoric shouldn’t be casually overlooked.

    When Donald Trump talks about using government power to go after his perceived political foes, he doesn’t just refer to current and former officials. In recent months, for example, the former president has repeatedly raised the specter of using federal powers to crack down on news organizations that report information he doesn’t like.

    People close to the Republican keep suggesting that Team Trump is quite serious about this. The New York Times reported:

    A confidant of Donald J. Trump who is likely to serve in a senior national security role in any new Trump administration threatened on Tuesday to target journalists for prosecution if the former president regains the White House. The confidant, Kash Patel, who served as Mr. Trump’s counterterrorism adviser on the National Security Council and also as chief of staff to the acting secretary of defense, made the remarks on a podcast hosted by Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s former strategist, during a discussion about a potential second Trump presidency beginning in 2025.

    “We will go out and find the conspirators, not just in government but in the media,” Patel said. “Yes, we’re going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections — we’re going to come after you. Whether it’s criminally or civilly, we’ll figure that out.” [JFC!]

    He went on to say, “We’re actually going to use the Constitution to prosecute them for crimes they said we have always been guilty of but never have.”

    Patel didn’t appear to be kidding. [video at the link]

    […] a spokesperson for Patel told the Times that in the same on-air appearance, the former Trump administration official would “follow the facts and the law.” Patel himself said in a written statement, “When President Trump takes office in 2025, we will prosecute anyone that broke the law and end the weaponized, two tier system of justice.”

    In reality, our system of justice has not been weaponized.

    Nevertheless, Patel said — out loud, on the record, while being recorded — that a second Trump administration intends to seek out “conspirators” in news organizations. There’s nothing subtle about, “We’re going to come after you,” while referencing the possibility of criminal charges.

    In case anyone needs a refresher, Patel is not just some random figure in the former president’s orbit. […] Fiona Hill, the former top Russia expert at the White House National Security Council, told Congress that she discovered that the then-president was ignoring the NSC’s Ukraine expert, choosing instead to listen to Patel — which struck Hill as quite odd.

    In fact, Patel had no expertise on Ukraine, though he was a congressional aide. With this in mind, Hill found it necessary to warn her staff to be “very careful” about communications with the Republican operative, and she removed Patel from internal distribution lists.

    A year later, Trump gave him a promotion, and Patel landed a plum assignment at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Nine months later, the outgoing Republican president gave Patel another promotion, naming him to a prominent position at the Pentagon.

    By some accounts, Trump, after his 2020 defeat, even wanted to make Patel the deputy director of the CIA, though other insiders pushed back aggressively and derailed the idea. Former Attorney General William Barr wrote in his memoir that Trump also considered making Patel the deputy director of the FBI, though Barr said he told the White House that would happen “over my dead body.”

    [Trump] designated Patel as of one of his representatives to the National Archives and Records Administration to deal with his presidential records — which in turn made Patel a relevant figure in the Mar-a-Lago scandal. (He later asserted his Fifth Amendment rights in front of a grand jury.)

    I mention this context because while there are plenty of Republican voices who can accurately be described as Trump “associates,” Patel is an actual insider. When he uses words like “we” and “us,” he’s speaking as someone who fully expects to have a leadership role in a prospective second Trump White House.

    And with this in mind, when Patel said the government would go after news organizations in the wake of the 2024 election, the rhetoric shouldn’t be casually overlooked.

  252. says

    https://twitter.com/allinwithchris/status/1732207898925637854

    All In with Chris Hayes

    It’s an “open admission in front of cameras said out loud to the nation that House Republicans—the senior House Republican—is actively running cover for criminal insurrectionists,” says @chrislhayes on Mike Johnson vowing to blur Jan. 6 footage to protect rioters. […]

    Just to be clear, when Speaker Johnson says he trusts the American people to draw their own conclusions, and not just be spoon-fed a narrative about January 6, he is quite explicitly feeding the conspiracy theories. The people that want this footage released by House Republicans want it released because they want to find the “hidden federal agents”. So, the intended audience understands that message loud and clear, but more unbelievable is the open admission in front of cameras, said out loud to the nation, that House Republicans, the Senior House Republican, is actively running cover for criminal insurrectionists.

    People who in full view of the public, with no expectation of privacy in the nation’s Capitol, stormed said Capitol, in some cases assaulting police officers, and attempted a violent coup. But we can’t show their faces because the Fuzz might get them?

    What really gives away the game is then the subsequent half-hearted attempt to walk those comments back after significant public outcry. Johnson’s spokesperson Raj Shah [said]

    Faces are to be blurred from public viewing room footage to prevent all forms of retaliation against private citizens from any non-governmental actors. The Department of Justice already has access to raw footage from January 6, 2021

    […]

    Just to be clear, that is not what the Speaker actually said. [He said he didn’t want them “to be charged by the DOJ.”] We can’t have people finding and identifying insurrectionists. Those are our people! We don’t want them arrested. […]

    All of this is in furtherance of the same objective, which is to protect and excuse the violent mob which attacked the Capitol. And that is now the official position, (from Mike Johnson’s lips to your ears), of the most powerful Republican in Washington and the Republican Party as a whole.

    Video at the link.

    Lots of other people used and are using that footage to help the FBI identify the insurrectionists.

  253. tomh says

    The Messenger:
    Jack Smith: Trump ‘Agent’ Sought To Cause Riot To Disrupt Michigan Vote Count in 2020
    Steve Reilly / 12/05/23

    Federal prosecutors said Tuesday they intend to present evidence at Donald Trump’s upcoming election-subversion trial that an agent of the former president sought “to cause a riot to disrupt the count” of votes in Detroit after the 2020 presidential election.

    In a court filing Tuesday, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office said the agent of Trump is an unindicted co-conspriator in the case, and identified him or her only as “Campaign Employee.”

    It is unclear whether or not the Trump 2020 campaign employee is among the six unindicted co-conspirators discussed in Trump’s Aug. 1 indictment or if it’s someone new altogether.

    “On November 4, 2020, the Campaign Employee exchanged a series of text messages with an attorney supporting the Campaign’s election day operations at the TCF Center in Detroit, where votes were being counted,” Smith’s office wrote. “[I]n the messages, the Campaign Employee encouraged rioting and other methods of obstruction when he learned that the vote count was trending in favor of the defendant’s opponent.”

    Around the time that those text messages were exchanged, prosecutors wrote, “an election official at the TCF Center observed that as [President Joe] Biden began to take the lead, a large number of untrained individuals flooded the TCF Center and began making illegitimate and aggressive challenges to the vote count.”

    “Thereafter, Trump made repeated false claims regarding election activities at the TCF Center, when in truth his agent was seeking to cause a riot to disrupt the count,” the prosecutors added.

  254. Reginald Selkirk says

    Religious studies professor speaks on agnostic beliefs

    Other areas that make teaching worthwhile for Barstow include stimulating students with new ideas. She added that students get partially excited when talking about Scientology…

    Scientology probably appears to be a safe target because there is a low chance that a Scientologist will be in the class to be offended, and it it is noticeably different from the dominant belief systems.

  255. says

    Followup to Reginald @344.

    As recently as September, then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy boasted, “I never quit.” In hindsight, perhaps “never” was the wrong choice of words.

    […] As a matter of legislative arithmetic, this is hardly good news for GOP leaders. A week ago, the House Republican conference had 222 members, which meant on any given vote, the majority could only afford to lose only four of its own members. Late last week, former Rep. George Santos was expelled, which left the conference with 221. After McCarthy exits later this month, the number will fall to 220.

    Though there’s some ambiguity as to when Republican Rep. Bill Johnson of Ohio will step down to become Youngstown State University’s new president, it’s possible we’ll soon see the GOP conference shrink to 219 — in a chamber where it takes 218 votes to pass anything.

    […] McCarthy picked fights he couldn’t win. He failed to count well. He pushed vulnerable members to cast difficult votes for no benefit. He directed his conference to focus on foolish trivialities. He lied to and about Democrats, whose support he eventually needed. He never learned the value of making plans, preferring instead to “wing it” in the hopes of surviving the day, becoming a chess player who only thought one move at a time.

    Perhaps most importantly, McCarthy re-embraced Donald Trump, effectively positioning the former president as a party leader adjacent to the speaker’s office, thereby allowing a MAGA vision to steer his conference — only to see Trump abandon him when McCarthy needed him most.

    To the extent that the Californian will have a legacy, it’s not an impressive one. McCarthy had effectively no legislative accomplishment before he became speaker, and he struggled to pass major bills during his tenure. All the while, the Republican earned a reputation for weakness.

    Five months before his death, the Washington Post’s Michael Gerson, George W. Bush’s former chief speechwriter, argued in a column, “Whatever his political future, McCarthy will be remembered as his generation’s most pathetic, unprincipled and contemptible political figure.” […]

    Link

  256. Reginald Selkirk says

    @347
    “Whatever his political future, McCarthy will be remembered as his generation’s most pathetic, unprincipled and contemptible political figure.”

    Oh c’mon. No respect for McCarthy, but think of all the other Republican political figures he would have to beat out to earn that designation.

  257. says

    Wisconsin Fake Electors Admit It Was All A Sham!

    The group of people who submitted fake elector certificates claiming that Donald Trump won Wisconsin in 2020 admitted in a legal settlement announced on Wednesday what’s been clear all along: Trump lost, and the effort was a con.

    Ten Republican fake electors from Wisconsin agreed per the terms of a civil settlement not to serve as presidential electors in next year’s election and to withdraw the elector certificates they submitted.

    Two electors representing Joe Biden filed the lawsuit last year in Dane County, Wisconsin, accusing the electors and two attorneys who worked on Trump’s effort to reverse his loss of conspiracy to defraud voters.

    Per the settlement, the ten fake electors made the following statement:

    “We hereby reaffirm that Joseph R. Biden, Jr. won the 2020 presidential election and that we were not the duly elected presidential electors for the State of Wisconsin for the 2020 presidential election,” the admission reads. “We oppose any attempt to undermine the public’s faith in the ultimate results of the 2020 presidential election.”

    Those two attorneys, Ken Chesebro and Jim Troupis, have not settled the lawsuit and are continuing as defendants. Chesebro pleaded guilty to one count in the Fulton County, Georgia RICO case over his role in the fake electors scheme and is cooperating with prosecutors in two other states.

    The admission by the fake electors is yet another marker of the depths of bad faith to which many Republican officials dropped in the effort to help Trump stay in office despite having lost the election. It was clear at the time that Trump had lost the election, in spite of the scattershot claims of voter fraud which the former president made in his bid to hold onto power.

    […] In the telling of Trump campaign attorneys, so long as there was a lawsuit in the state, all the fake electors were doing was “preserving” the former president’s legal options should he prevail in any of the groundless lawsuits he filed.

    That idea of “preservation” was largely the brainchild of Chesebro, a Wisconsin-born attorney who defended his efforts in an exclusive interview to TPM last year as “what lawyers do.”

    Now, the fake electors themselves have effectively admitted that the whole thing was a sham.

    […] Text messages released in the settlement agreement show how the fake electors admitted at one point that the plan was fundamentally deceptive. On Jan. 4, one elector complained that “freaking Trump idiots want someone to fly original elector papers to the senate President.” Darryl Carlson, another elector, texted before the fake votes were cast that “They don’t want to have a technicality mess up the possible steal.” […]

  258. says

    Reginald @348, good point. I agree.

    In other news: Ukraine Update: Trump, Putin prevail with Republican senators

    Biden just spoke, slamming Republicans for “playing chicken with our national security.”

    Biden: “Extreme Republicans are playing chicken with our national security … Republicans think they can get everything they want without any bipartisan compromise. That’s not the answer”

    [video at the link]

    Senate Republicans stormed out of a classified briefing about Ukraine on Tuesday in a performative tantrum over immigration, dooming a procedural vote Wednesday on aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan—and, potentially, the assistance altogether. This was a serious escalation in the Republicans’ effort to force through racist, xenophobic immigration policy reforms, and it will make finding a resolution to provide urgent aid for Ukraine that much harder.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had intended to participate in the briefing via video but was unable to. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and other Biden officials went ahead with the briefing, so the Republican senators were unconstrained by the need to act like serious lawmakers in front of company. In short, Republicans attended a classified briefing on Ukraine and had a fit that the briefing wasn’t about the border.

    […] Sen. Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican, unironically accused Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of refusing to negotiate on border security. “He wouldn’t bring anybody in here to talk about it,” Cramer said. “Clearly the military people in the room don’t want to talk about it.”

    Indeed, because they were there to talk about Ukraine, Schumer accused Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who was previously among the staunchest supporters of Ukraine, of engineering the stunt.

    “It was immediately hijacked by leader McConnell. The first question—instead of asking our panelists—he called on [GOP Sen. James] Lankford to give a five-minute talk about the negotiations on the border, and that wasn’t the purpose of the meeting at all,” Schumer said afterward. […]

    “They didn’t like it and even one of them started—was disrespectful—and started screaming at one of the generals and challenging him why he didn’t go to the border,” Schumer said. That senator appears to have been Cramer, who bragged about it later. “I took them on with the microphone in my hand,” he crowed to reporters.

    Schumer is bringing up the first procedural vote on the aid bill on Wednesday, and offered an amendment on immigration, which the GOP has rejected, with McConnell leading the way. “I’m advocating and I hope all of our members vote no on the motion to proceed to the shell [bill] to make the point, hopefully for the final time, that we insist on meaningful changes to the border,” McConnell told reporters.

    Looks like Moscow Mitch is back in the saddle, putting Putin—and by extension Donald Trump—first again. This is, after all, about the ability of Russia to trample over a western neighbor.

    And while Republicans are fighting over an imagined U.S. border war, Russia is bombing Ukrainian civilians. [Tweet and video at the link. Russia fired S-300 into a theatre in Kherson, burning down a humanitarian aid station.]

  259. says

    DOJ charges four Russian soldiers with war crimes related to Ukraine invasion

    The indictment alleges that the four interrogated, beat and tortured an American, threatening to kill him in a mock execution. The American was not involved in the war, DOJ said.

    […] The indictment, returned in the Eastern District of Virginia, alleges that the four interrogated, beat and tortured an American victim, threatening to kill him in a mock execution.

    After the mock execution, the victim “was forced to perform manual labor, such as digging trenches, on behalf of the Russian Armed Forces and/or [Donetsk People’s Republic] military units,” the indictment says.

    The American, identified only as “V-1” in the indictment, was not involved in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, according to DOJ. He was living in Mylove, a small village in southern Ukraine, and was kidnapped from his home by Russian soldiers, the indictment says.

    “As the world has witnessed the horrors of Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine, so has the United States Department of Justice,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said. “That is why the Justice Department has filed the first-ever charges under the U.S. war crimes statute against four Russia-affiliated military personnel for heinous crimes against an American citizen. The Justice Department will work for as long as it takes to pursue accountability and justice for Russia’s war of aggression.” […]

  260. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 394

    I can hear the right-wingers now: “They were FORCED to settle by the DEEP STATE, but we all know the truth!”

  261. Reginald Selkirk says

    Biden announces support for the Haudenosaunee Confederacy competing under their own flag in 2028 Olympics

    President Joe Biden on Wednesday announced his support for a new team – and flag – competing in the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles.

    Delivering remarks at the White House Tribal Nations Summit in Washington, Biden said his administration would back a request from the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, previously known as the Iroquois Confederacy, to compete internationally under their own flag in lacrosse at the 2028 games…

  262. Reginald Selkirk says

    Daddy Yankee says he’s retiring to focus on his Christian faith

    Reggaeton superstar Daddy Yankee has announced the end of his music career in order to dedicate his life to his Christian faith.

    In a speech at the end of his final concert on Sunday, the singer, whose real name is Ramón Luis Ayala Rodríguez, told the crowd that he had come to the realization that “living a successful life is not the same as living a purposeful life.” …

    How is doing what your imaginary friend wants any more “purposeful” than finding your own meaning in life?

  263. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 354

    I got a feeling this geek got ahold of one of Rick Warren’s screed and know thinks that his sole “purpose” is to grovel before Gawd and make others to grovel too.

  264. Reginald Selkirk says

    Oldest mosquito in amber reveals bloodsucking surprise

    Researchers said they have discovered the oldest-known fossils of mosquitoes — two males entombed in pieces of amber dating to 130 million years ago, during the Cretaceous Period, and found near the town of Hammana in Lebanon.

    To their surprise, the male mosquitoes possessed elongated piercing-sucking mouth parts now seen only in females…

  265. says

    Fake electors from the 2020 elections have already been charged in Georgia and Michigan. Today, a grand jury also indicted fake electors in Nevada.

    After the Democratic ticket won the 2020 presidential election, Republicans in seven states — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — hatched what became known as the “fake electors” scheme. The consequences of the sham continue to reverberate.

    As regular readers know, as part of the gambit, GOP operatives created forged election materials, pretending to be “duly elected and qualified electors,” and sent the documents to the U.S. Senate and the U.S. Archivist, as if the fraudulent materials were legitimate. They were not legitimate.

    In terms of accountability, there have been several developments of late. In Michigan and Georgia, for example, prosecutors have already filed criminal charges against some of the fake electors, while in Wisconsin, the Republicans who pretended to be real electors agreed to a court settlement in a civil case.

    This afternoon, the list grew a little longer. The Nevada Independent reported:

    A Nevada grand jury has indicted the six Republicans — including the chair of the Nevada Republican Party — who falsely pledged Nevada’s electoral votes to Donald Trump following the 2020 election despite President Joe Biden’s victory in the state. … In a press release, [the office of Aaron Ford, Nevada’s Democratic state attorney general] said all six individuals had been indicted on two felony charges — offering a false instrument for filing and uttering a forged instrument by submitting fraudulent documents to state and federal officials.

    “[…] Today’s indictments are the product of a long and thorough investigation, and as we pursue this prosecution, I am confident that our judicial system will see justice done.”

    […] The list might yet grow: CNN reported four weeks ago that Kris Mayes, Arizona’s Democratic state attorney general of Arizona, told CNN that her office is overseeing a “robust” investigation into her state’s fake electors, adding that she’d been in contact with investigators in the Justice Department, as well as in Georgia and Michigan.

    […] What’s more, New Mexico’s state attorney general’s office also confirmed last week that it, too, is investigating its GOP fake electors from 2020.

    All good news!

  266. says

    Followup to comments 315 and 342.

    Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) on Tuesday criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and House Republicans’ decision to blur the faces of those who breached the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in security tapes, arguing it’s an attempt to suggest the tape’s contents “would change the facts of what happened.”

    “I think that we’re experiencing a situation where … Speaker Johnson is somehow attempting to suggest that there is something in these tapes that would change the facts of what happened,” Cheney said in an interview with CNN anchor Anderson Cooper. “There’s nothing in the tape that can change the facts of what happened that day, can change the violent assault.” […]

    Link

  267. says

    Liz Cheney, Rachel Maddow Agree: Donald Trump Greater Threat To America Than Liz’s Dad

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/liz-cheney-rachel-maddow-agree-donald

    Former congresswoman Liz Cheney (R-Wyoming) sat down for an interview with Rachel Maddow on Monday. Superficially, it was the first stop on Cheney’s tour to promote her new book, Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning, which came out a few hours after the interview. But damn, even after a lot of pre-release teases of the book, it was still pretty incredible to see Cheney — still very much the rightwing militarist conservative hawk she’s always been — telling Maddow all about listening in on a phone call between Trump lawyers and campaign surrogates two days before January 6, 2021, and her “nauseating” realization that they really were out to ignore the results of a legitimate election:

    “I had heard, obviously, there had been talk about having these electors meet, but it wasn’t clear to me what the contours of this particular part of the plan were until I got onto that phone call.

    “Listening to them describe how these fake electors would be used, and the fact that they anticipated that Vice President Pence was going to use them to count legitimate electors, was certainly a moment of intense concern.”

    [Understatement]

    Cheney said she immediately ran to the House Parliamentarian’s office to see what might be done to stop that, but nope, no luck:

    “If you’re in a joint session of Congress, you’re not in a position where there are a lot of legislative steps that you can take except to basically move to adjourn, so it was a very dangerous and chilling moment.”

    Well damn, that’s not good. Lucky for America that Dan Goddamned Quayle and others made clear to Pence that he didn’t have the authority to do that.

    Here’s a highlights reel of the big moments from the interview that MSNBC posted to YouTube; we have to say we appreciated the very Rachel Maddow-y preface in which she explains just how thoroughly she disagrees with Cheney, and always will, on every last bit of political policy under the sun. And not just politics: “Honestly, I once even got mad at Liz Cheney about fishing. And it’s the one thing you’d think we’d have in common, right?”

    […] But on Donald Trump, they agree: If that guy takes office again, he isn’t going to leave as long as he draws breath. [video at the link]

    Cheney didn’t have anything good to say about Mike Johnson, the accidental Speaker of the House, either. She said it would be “terrifying” if Republicans still control the House after the 2024 elections, because even if Trump loses the electoral vote, Johnson shouldn’t be trusted with certifying the vote. Even though they used to have offices next to each other and she originally believed Johnson to be “a man of principle,” her friendship with Johnson didn’t last.

    “What I learned was he was willing to do things he knew to be wrong in order to placate Donald Trump. [Nicely put, Liz] And again, a situation where you have a Speaker of the House, who […] so clearly set aside what he knew to be the facts, what he knew to be the law, what he knew to be our obligations under the Constitution in order to try to help Donald Trump in his efforts in 2020.

    “We cannot count on a majority of Republicans, on someone like that, to do the right thing […] So it’s really serious.”

    Cheney reiterated that for fuckssake — she totally said that, believe me! — we can’t let Donald Trump take power again, because whatever she might dislike about Joe Biden, Americans must “make clear that Donald Trump is not an acceptable alternative.”

    He [Trump] is not the lesser of two evils. He is a completely unfit man for office. He’s already shown us what he would do, and he can never be near the Oval Office again.”

    So yeah, good interview! Good reminders. And good god, let’s hope voters pay attention.

  268. says

    Shooting shuts down University of Nevada Las Vegas campus.

    Washington Post link

    The University of Nevada Las Vegas became the latest scene of a multiple shooting on Wednesday when gunfire broke out on campus, sending students and faculty fleeing or into lockdown.

    Law enforcement officials said there were at least three victims but did not detail their condition and said “that number could change.” They said a suspect had been found dead.

    The university had posted on X, formerly Twitter, that the shooter was at Beam Hall, site of UNLV’s Lee Business School, but added that police were responding to another report of shots fired nearby.

    About 40 minutes after the initial alert, Las Vegas police said a suspect “has been located and is deceased.”

    “Yes there are victims,” police spokesman Kevin McMahill said. He said officals were awaiting information about their conditions from local hospitals.

    Streets for blocks around campus were cordoned off amid a mass of police and emergency vehicles. Students and faculty reported hiding in offices and dorms after the university sent out its first alert, with subsequent warnings that all should “evacuate to a safe place. RUN-HIDE-FIGHT.”

    By 2 p.m. local time, police were trying to systematically clear campus buildings and were sending many people to the campus events arena for “reunification.”

  269. says

    Texas shootings: Timeline of the string of attacks near San Antonio and in Austin

    A suspect is in custody after six people were killed and another three were injured across two communities, officials in Bexar County and Austin said.

    A suspect is in custody in Texas after six people were killed and three were injured in homicides and shootings near San Antonio and in Austin on Tuesday, authorities said.

    Police said the suspect, identified Wednesday afternoon as Shane James, 34, is in the Travis County Jail in Austin on charges of capital murder.

    The killings took place over the course of eight hours in multiple locations. [Timeline at the link]

  270. says

    From The Washington Post’s reporting:

    President Biden made an urgent plea to congressional lawmakers Wednesday to pass billions of dollars in Ukraine aid, warning that a failure to do so would hand Russian President Vladimir Putin a victory and embolden him to invade European countries beyond Ukraine.

    “This cannot wait,” Biden said. “It’s stunning that we’ve gotten to this point in the first place … Republicans in Congress that are willing to give Putin the greatest gift he could hope for.”

  271. says

    Some good news, as reported by Reuters:

    The U.S. Senate on Monday confirmed the first Latina judge to serve on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, giving Democratic President Joe Biden his second appointee on a court whose conservative majority has often blocked his policies.

    The Senate voted 80-12 to elevate U.S. Magistrate Irma Carrillo Ramirez to the New Orleans-based court, where she would become the fifth active Democratic appointee on a court dominated by the 12 judges nominated by Republican presidents.

  272. says

    I plan to ignore this debate, but I will look for a summary to post tomorrow:

    The Republican 2024 candidates not named Donald Trump descend on Tuscaloosa, Alabama Wednesday [today] at 8:00 p.m. ET for their final scheduled debate.

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and tech businessman Vivek Ramaswamy will duke it out […]

  273. Reginald Selkirk says

    America’s Most Exciting High Speed Rail Project Gets $3 Billion Grant From Feds

    A high-speed train from the greater Los Angeles area to Las Vegas took a big step closer to reality thanks to a $3 billion federal grant from the Department of Transportation and Joe Biden’s signature infrastructure law.

    The proposed line will be built by Brightline West, a private company owned by Fortress Investment Group (disclosure: VICE Media is owned by Fortress Investment Group). It promises to use all-electric high-speed trains that can travel up to 180 mph, which will half the travel time from Los Angeles to Las Vegas without even taking into account the terrible traffic during peak travel times. The one catch is the LA station will be in Rancho Cucamonga, about 45 miles from Union Station (it is, however, connected via Metrolink trains). The Las Vegas station is more centrally located close to the airport…

  274. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    Dieselgate, but for trains

    A train manufactured by a Polish company suddenly broke down during maintenance. […] the train is ready to run—but it does not run. […] second train is undergoing an identical maintenance, with identical results. […] the manufacturer refuses to help. […] third […] comes to a standstill […] In addition, at another workshop […] another […] breaks down […] does not start up after servicing.
    […]
    Months of analysis and reverse engineering uncovered some extremely interesting conditions written into the software […] causing sudden train sickness. […] code to disable the ability to run a train if [GPS] spends at least 10 days in one of these workshops. […] blocking of a train when one of its components is replaced (verified by its serial number). […] code was found instructing it to ‘break down’ after a million kilometres. […] [Plus lying about a faulty part every winter.]
    […]
    It turned out to be quite a common problem. […] [24 more affected trains were confirmed at other railroad companies.] […] although there is litigation in the case, it is hard to find an institution in Poland that has done anything beyond kindly expressing interest

  275. Reginald Selkirk says

    Northern branches out with new GPS technology to successfully battle autumn leaf fall

    New GPS tracking on Northern trains has been used successfully to make autumn conditions even safer by flagging leaf fall hotspots.

    Fallen leaves can cause significant disruption to the network. Leaves stick to damp rails and passing trains compress them into a smooth, slippery layer, reducing trains’ grip. This can cause delays to services, which lead to disruption for passengers.

    But cutting-edge technology being used by Northern on its CAF fleet shows the train operator where there may be tricky conditions for drivers by tracking how the train is moving.

    It tracks any small slips or slides on a mapping system which can be shared with drivers to forewarn them of any tricky conditions or with Network Rail who clean the tracks…

    The train operator is also testing ‘rail head treatment technology’ which is attached to the undercarriage of passenger trains and could save the rail industry millions of pounds every year…

    The latter sounds like the return of the “cow catcher.” They should just strap a couple leaf blowers to the front of each train.

  276. Jazzlet says

    Reginald Selkirk @376
    A leaf blower wouldn’t make any difference, the point is if the rails and/or leaves are wet they stick to each other, but if the rails are dry and the leaves are dry the passing of the train is enough to clear the rails. If you read the linked article https://media.northernrailway.co.uk/news/first-look-gopro-footage-shows-water-technology-fitted-underneath-northern-passenger-train-blasting-disruptive-fallen-leaves-from-the-track and watched the video you’d see that the ‘rail head treatment technology’ sends a jet of water onto the track cleaning it before the first wheel hits the leaves – it’s basically a fancy name for a hose rather than a cow catcher.

  277. Jazzlet says

    birgerjohansson ‘374
    That’s pretty cool, and it makes complete sense that a drug designed to modulate another autoimmune disease could work for Type 1 diabetes.

  278. StevoR says

    Yikes. I hate Summers now. Come toreally dread them – and its only December.. Months of fear of bushfires and heatwaves and drought and struggling to keep plants and animals (fur family included esp) alive ahead here.

    On the good side there’s the distraction and fun of the cricket season but..

    Catastrophic bushfire danger, thunderstorms and wind gusts of up to 100 kilometres per hour tomorrow could cause bushfires that would be “incredibly difficult” to control, the SA Country Fire Service (CFS) warns. The CFS has forecast catastrophic bushfire conditions for the eastern Eyre Peninsula, Yorke Peninsula, Mid North, Flinders and the Riverland on Friday, as well as extreme conditions in the Northeast Pastoral, West Coast, Upper South East, Mt Lofty Ranges and Murraylands.The Bureau of Meteorology forecasts those conditions to be quickly followed by lightning strikes and wind of up to 100 kph in some parts of the state. CFS chief officer, Brett Loughlin, said the expected conditions means if a bushfire starts it would be hard to control, and that aerial firefighting equipment might not be able to help extinguish fires. “Waiting for a fire to start in your area is very likely to be too late under the forecast conditions tomorrow,” Mr Loughlin said.

    Source : https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-07/south-australia-prepares-for-severe-weather/103199186

  279. Reginald Selkirk says

    Candidate for Santos’ old seat is convicted on Jan. 6 charges after testifying he had ‘no idea’ Congress met in the Capitol

    A New York man who is running for the congressional seat previously held by George Santos was convicted this week of charges relating to the Jan. 6 riot after he testified at his trial that he didn’t know Congress convened inside the Capitol.

    Philip Sean Grillo, of Queens, was found guilty Tuesday of the felony charge of obstruction of an official proceeding, along with a series of misdemeanors like entering restricted grounds and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building, the Justice Department said in a news release…

  280. Akira MacKenzie says

    @381

    “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

    Considering that we’re letting this shit and Trump run, I think we can call the 14th Amendment to be a dead letter law.

  281. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    TheJuiceMedia – Honest Government Ad, How to rig elections [in Australia] (4:09)

    1. Give ourselves more of your money.
    2. Cap the only funding newcomers have to challenge us.
    3. And exempt ourselves from those caps.

    We know you’d never stand for this sh*tf*ck*ry, so we’ll call it an “Integrity Reform”, and maybe throw in some good stuff so you’ll pat us on the d*ck for “saving democracy”. And if that sounds like an outlandish conspiracy to entrench our two-party duopoly forever, just remember that’s exactly what happened in Victoria.
    […]
    We’re really hoping you don’t get wind of our plan before we try to ram it through Parliment so please don’t share this

  282. tomh says

    LA Times
    Kevin McCarthy uses PAC to lavish cash on high-end resorts, private jets and fine dining
    Paul Pringle, Adam Elmahrek / Dec. 7, 2023

    Rambling above the rust-colored cliffs of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, the Terranea Resort is known for its ocean views, world-ranked spa and villas that can command $3,000 a night or more.

    The property is less well known as a gathering spot for federal elected officials and the campaign donors they wine and dine.

    But one politician was very familiar with the luxurious resort: former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. In 2 ½ years, the Bakersfield Republican’s election committees dropped nearly a quarter of a million dollars at Terranea, with most of the money coming from a thinly regulated leadership PAC, a Times investigation has found.

    As he exits Congress two months after his historic ouster as speaker, political obituaries tout McCarthy’s skills as a prolific fundraiser on behalf of Republican candidates. Also setting him apart from other congressional leaders was his roughly decade-long pattern of using his Majority Committee PAC to spend lavishly on hotels, private jets and fine dining establishments, according to a Times analysis of campaign finance records on file with the Federal Election Commission.

    From 2012 through last June, McCarthy’s PAC shelled out more than $1 million on hotels, private air travel and eateries, the FEC records show. That’s more than double the combined total spent by the leadership PACs of the seven other lawmakers who’ve held the top House and Senate positions for their parties during all or part of that period, according to the Times analysis.

    Leadership PACs are subject to fewer spending controls than other campaign accounts. In fact, the FEC determined earlier this year that those committees are free to use their money on personal expenses, without limits. Even before the ruling, good-government advocates complained to the FEC that politicians were using their leadership PACs as personal slush funds to subsidize expensive lifestyles. Now, they fear the problem will grow worse.

    “Unfortunately, it’s a little bit of the Wild West,” said Michael Beckel, research director for Issue One, a nonprofit organization that studies the role of money in politics. He said the group has “deep concerns” that politicians could use “leadership PAC funds for their own personal enrichment.”…

  283. says

    SteveoR @379, that does sound quite dire.

    Reginald @381, sounds like the ideal Republican candidate.

    Akira @382, “I think we can call the 14th Amendment to be a dead letter law.” Yep. You are not the only one saying that.

    tomh @385, in other words, Kevin McCarthy was running a scam. He must have really enjoyed all that high-end travel, fancy resorts, etc.

  284. says

    A surprising number of Republicans from The Villages have been convicted of trying to cheat in the 2020 elections. The list grew longer this week.

    To the extent that the United States has a retirement community known to national audiences, it’s probably The Villages in central Florida. As regular readers probably recall, it’s also earned a reputation as a far-right Republican stronghold.

    For example, when Donald Trump promoted a video showing a parade of supporters in golf carts — one of whom shouted, “White power” — it was recorded at The Villages.

    It was against this backdrop that we learned in 2021 that three residents of The Villages were charged with voter fraud. A fourth soon followed. As WKMG in Orlando reported this week, the list now includes a fifth.

    A resident from The Villages was found guilty of charges related to voter fraud in the 2020 election on Monday. Robert Rivernider Jr., 58, is accused of signing his father’s name to a vote-by-mail ballot. According to Sumter County Elections Supervisor Bill Keen, Rivernider’s father died on Oct. 19, 2020. He had a ballot dated and signed on Oct. 16, 2020, and postmarked on Oct. 23, 2020.

    Officials discovered a problem with the late voter’s signature, which apparently helped lead to Rivernider’s conviction.

    The local report from the CBS affiliate added, “Rivernider is a Republican Party activist, with a website that touts his experience with several party campaigns, including the Trump and Bush/Cheney presidential campaigns and the Laura Loomer congressional campaign in 2022.”

    It’s also a feather in the cap for Gov. Ron DeSantis’ Office of Election Crimes and Security, which has apparently managed to secure a conviction following a series of failed cases.

    As for the possible consequences, Rivernider is facing the possibility of a prison sentence, though it remains to be seen whether that’ll happen. The other fraud charges against residents of The Villages ended in parole for the defendants.

    Of course, they agreed to plead guilty ahead of their trials. Rivernider took his chances with a local jury, which convicted him.

    He was represented by former state Rep. Anthony Sabatini, who’s running a Republican congressional campaign in Florida next year.

    After the verdict was announced, the headline in The Villages’ own newspaper read, “Trumper shocked when jury finds him guilty of vote fraud.”

    LOL

  285. says

    Republicans pretend Trump’s ‘Day One’ dictator talk doesn’t matter

    Donald Trump managed to break new rhetorical ground this week, declaring at a Fox News town hall event in Iowa that he would not be a dictator if he returned to the White House — “except for Day One.” Offered an opportunity to explain himself, the former president suggested that he’d use dictatorial powers to “close the border” and approve increased oil drilling.

    When Sean Hannity tried to help his guest, the GOP frontrunner doubled down.

    “I love this guy,” Trump added, referring to the host. “He says, ‘You’re not going to be a dictator, are you?’ I said: ‘No, no, no. Other than Day One.’ We’re closing the border, and we’re drilling, drilling, drilling. After that, I’m not a dictator.”

    By any chance, might Republican officials have some concerns about their likely 2024 nominee endorsing a temporary dictatorship? Evidently not. Axios reported on some of the next-day reactions from prominent GOP senators:

    “Trump’s super power is that he’s the most quick witted leader in a generation. Every grown man hyperventilating about this clip needs to find a sense of humor,” Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) tweeted. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), who endorsed Trump this week, laughed at the clip on Fox Business and focused his response on the need for tighter border security.

    When Republican Sen. Thom Tillis talked to CNN, the North Carolinian suggested Trump was right. “He said he would do two things: He would close the border and drill,” Tillis said. “Everybody could say that’s abusing power, I think that’s a righteous use of power and President Biden’s failed on it.”

    Sen. Mitt Romney might seem like the sort of Republican who’d have a sensible reaction, but the Utah Republican also told CNN that the former president was merely “firing up the base” and “entertaining people.”

    This need not be complicated. Trump, with little subtlety, has touted an authoritarian-style vision for the United States. Under the Republican’s preferred approach, he would seize control of government departments and agencies that have historically operated with independence, enact radical anti-immigration plans, use government powers to crack down on journalists, and hire right-wing lawyers who will be positioned to help Trump politicize federal law enforcement and exact revenge against his perceived political foes.

    He’s also been quite candid about issuing pardons to politically allied criminals and labeling his opponents “vermin,” seemingly indifferent to the word’s 1930s-era antecedents.

    It was against this backdrop that the former president was offered multiple opportunities to reject the idea of using dictatorial powers if given a second term, and he did the exact opposite.

    At which point, Republicans shrugged. Even during Wednesday night’s GOP presidential primary debate, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, trailing Trump by roughly 40 points, chided “the media” for “making a big deal” about the dictatorial rhetoric.

    I realize that much of the GOP is convinced that Trump won’t follow through on his most dangerous and radical ambitions, but I’d remind Republicans of an infamous quote from a party insider in mid-November 2020.

    “What is the downside for humoring him for this little bit of time?” a senior Republican official said as Trump pretended he won the 2020 race. The same unnamed official added, “It’s not like he’s plotting how to prevent Joe Biden from taking power on Jan. 20.”

    In the days and weeks that followed, Trump plotted on how to prevent Joe Biden from taking power on Jan. 20.

    The lesson Republicans were supposed to have learned was that “humoring him” has an unmistakable “downside.” There’s fresh evidence that the lesson was discarded far too quickly.

  286. says

    House Speaker Mike Johnson’s inexperience showing

    House and Senate negotiators reached agreement on a major defense and national security policy bill, the National Defense Authorization Act, on Wednesday. It’s likely to be the only legislative accomplishment they achieve before leaving for the the end of the year, if it does indeed pass.[…]

    […] members of the hard-right House, which loaded their version of the bill up with all toxic provisions, howling and vowing to vote against the bill. The bigger problem in the House, though, is Speaker Mike Johnson’s bungling of another provision in the NDAA. The conference committee decided to add a short-term extension of the nation’s warrantless surveillance powers in the bill, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, after several misfires on the issue from Johnson.

    In the course of the last week or so, Johnson has taken three different positions on getting that done. On Nov. 29, he said he wanted to include an extension of it until Feb. 2. Then on Tuesday of this week, he told the GOP conference that he would put two competing reauthorization bills—one from House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan and another from House Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Turner—on the floor in a head-to-head matchup. Whichever bill got the most votes would be sent to the Senate. Punchbowl News reported that he had instructed the members of the defense authorization conference to keep the FISA extension out of the bill, and “got cheers from conservatives for this statement.” Then on Wednesday, he made a complete about-face, agreeing to include an extension of the surveillance powers until April.

    That same day, Jordan’s committee passed his bipartisan overhaul of FISA in committee by a 35-2 margin. Jordan had every expectation of his bill passing and wanted it to go to the floor next week, as he thought Johnson had promised. That’s precisely the kind of indecision and flip-flopping that already has Johnson in trouble with his fractious caucus, and since they are all unappeasable, it’s not going to get any better for him.

    The Senate took up the defense authorization on Thursday with the initial procedural vote, which gives Johnson the weekend to try to smooth ruffled feathers and get the bill done on their side next week, likely the last substantive thing that will happen before they leave for Christmas.

    That’s the worry for Ukraine and other countries in need of aid: that the House will leave town before the Senate passes its $110.5 billion supplemental foreign assistance package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. There’s been no advance in the stalemate on that issue since GOP senators threw their border security tantrum Tuesday. It’s looking likelier by the day that the urgently needed aid for Ukraine is not going to be passed before the end of the year.

    And when Congress returns in January, as Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington reminds everyone, they’re going to have to get serious about passing government funding. Her concern is that Johnson’s supposed fallback proposal—to just extend current funding until the end of the fiscal year—will end up being the default. “It’s dangerous and a non-starter,” the Senate Appropriations Committee chair told Politico Wednesday. “Everybody needs to understand that it’s dangerous, and we can’t go there.”

    She’s right to be worried. The budget agreement that President Joe Biden and former Speaker Kevin McCarthy made back in May tried to avert just that eventuality by levying cuts if lawmakers extended funding with continuing resolutions. The $777 billion now budgeted for non-defense programs would plummet to $704 billion if regular funding bills aren’t passed.

    Murray is also right to be worried that it’s Johnson in charge of figuring this out for the House. His combination of inexperience and arrogance makes him an unpredictable and dangerous negotiating partner.

    What a fucking mess. And now we add Mike Johnson’s incompetence to the mess.

  287. says

    Another GOP debate […]

    Republicans held their fourth presidential primary debate, and once again, the likely nominee wasn’t on stage. Let’s be clear: Donald Trump is at nearly 60% in the national polling average, well over 40 percentage points ahead of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in second place. Trump looks a little weaker in the early states, to be sure. But he’s still at 45.9% in Iowa and 44.7% in New Hampshire, with no one else cracking 20% in either state. This debate comes after the Koch brothers-founded Americans for Prosperity Action endorsed former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley in a last-ditch effort to beat Trump, which put Haley in the spotlight for debate night, given that the actual leader of the race wasn’t there.

    Both DeSantis and shady businessman Vivek Ramaswamy took the bait and went after Haley, with Ramaswamy in typically insulting form—including holding up a notepad on which he’d written “Nikki = corrupt”—and DeSantis in typically bigoted form, attacking her for supposedly opposing a bill banning medical care for transgender kids. (Haley assured Republican voters that she’s anti-trans, calling trans girls’ participation in sports “the women’s issue of our time.”) Both DeSantis and Ramaswamy attacked Haley for the support she’s gotten from big donors, to which she responded, accurately, “In terms of these donors that are supporting me, they’re just jealous. They wish that they were supporting them.” Of DeSantis specifically, she said, again accurately, “He’s mad because those Wall Street donors used to support him and now they support me.” [True]

    After three strong debates that helped her get all that big-donor support and made her a target for DeSantis and Ramaswamy, though, Haley had perhaps her weakest debate. […], that’s a miscalculation because being the top prospect to take down Trump still means you need to take down Trump. That requires a whole new level of breakthrough moment, and Haley didn’t come close.

    New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, the fourth person on stage, again hit Trump harder than any of the other debaters, slamming him for not having “the guts to show up and stand here”—but also highlighting how the other candidates “are all seemingly to compete with, you know, Voldemort, he who shall not be named. They don’t want to talk about it.” Christie called Trump “a dictator, a bully who has taken shots at everybody, whether they’ve given him great service or not over time, who dares to disagree with him,” and said, “He is unfit. This is a guy who just said this past week that he wants to use the Department of Justice to go after his enemies when he gets in there. The fact of the matter is, he is unfit to be president, and there is no bigger issue in this race.”

    […] There were some entertaining moments, and plenty of appalling moments. There was plenty of evidence of how far right and how oriented to bigotry and hate today’s Republican Party is. There was nothing to make you think any of these people were going to be the nominee.

    Ramaswamy made an aggressive play for the conspiracy theorist vote, showing where he thinks his future lies:

    Ramaswamy: If you want somebody who’s going speak truth to power, vote for someone who will speak truth to you. (starts talking how January 6th was inside job, replacement theory, how the 2016 election was stolen from Trump)

    [video at the link]

    Christie indulged his desire to take a verbal baseball bat to Ramaswamy […]

    Christie to Ramaswamy: This is the fourth debate that you would be voted in the 1st 20 minutes as the most obnoxious blowhard in America.

    [video at the link]

    For a few brief moments out of a couple hours, it may have been mildly entertaining. But it’s hard to make the case that it meant anything much.

  288. says

    New report unsurprisingly shows that profiteers have raised prices well above the rise in costs

    A new report from progressive UK.-based think-tanks IPPR and Common Wealth says profiteering played a major role in jacking up prices far above the rise in costs, reinforcing a previous but narrower study showing such an impact. Among other things, the researchers called for a global corporation tax to curtail unrestrained profits.

    The team analyzed 1,350 companies listed on stock markets in the United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Brazil, and South Africa. It found that profits rose by 30% among firms listed in the U.K., this increase being primarily driven by 11% of them garnering super profits in the post-pandemic world. In the U.S. the profits were even more excessive, but also more broadly based, involving 33% of companies.

    Giant energy companies, mining companies, and monopolistic food companies all saw their profits leap ahead of inflation after the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. The report noted, “Because energy and food prices feed so significantly into costs across all sectors of the wider economy, this exacerbated the initial price shock—contributing to inflation peaking higher and lasting longer than had there been less market power.”

    Technology companies, telecommunications, and banking also raised their profit margins with big price hikes. “Such companies have been able to protect their profit margins or even increase them, generating excess profits through a combination of high market power and global market dynamics,” the report said.

    Some examples of companies who boosted profits the most from the pre-pandemic average: ExxonMobil—profits of $18.9 billion rose to $66.6 billion; Shell—$20 billion rose to $55 billion; Archer-Daniels-Midland—$1.77 billion rose to $4 billion; and Kraft Heinz—$333 million rose to $2.3 billion.

    Monopolistic market clout drove some of those higher profits. “This has caused significant harm to the economy as a whole,” according to the report. “Global GDP could be 8% higher than it is now had market power not risen. Labour income is likely significantly lower, and economic dynamism is weaker—with poorer choice, worse product quality and fewer economic opportunities—than in a counterfactual world where big corporations were less dominant.” From the report: [details at the link]

  289. says

    Off and on for over a decade, Wyoming leaders have threatened to auction off large chunks of pristine, state-owned parcels of land within Grand Teton National Park to the highest-bidding developer to prod the U.S. government to step in and pay millions to conserve the properties.

    On Thursday, they might make good on those threats. Up for a vote is whether to auction off the last of those lands — and arguably most valuable of them all, a gorgeous, square-mile (2.6-square-kilometer) property with Teton Range views and road access — by the end of January.

    Auction is the recommendation of State Lands Director Jenifer Scoggin, who suggests a starting bid of no less than $80 million. In a report for the Wyoming Board of Land Commissioners that will hold the vote, she said state law requires her to get the highest value from state-owned lands to raise revenue for public schools.

    Scoggin works under Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican who has been quietly nudging Interior Department officials to conclude a series of purchases of land Wyoming has owned since statehood and that has existed within — but technically not part of — Grand Teton since a park expansion in 1950. […]

    “This area should not be destroyed by the construction of luxury houses and other development,” reads a form statement for submission to the state on the National Wildlife Federation Action Fund website. “Too much development has already encroached on critical winter habitat near the park.” […]

    Link

  290. says

    In a historic ruling today, a Texas judge granted a woman’s request for an emergency abortion. Kate Cox asked a Texas court earlier this week to halt enforcement of the state’s near total abortion ban. Judge Maya Guerra Gamble said yes.

    Her petition to the court was the first time since abortion was legalized in 1973 that an adult pregnant person asked a court for permission to get an abortion.

    The decision comes after Cox learned in late November that her fetus was diagnosed with full trisomy 18, ​​a chromosomal disorder that causes fetuses to die before or soon after birth. With each day that passed, her doctor’s explained, the pregnancy was a risk to her health. But because of Texas’ abortion ban, Cox’s doctors said their “hands are tied.” She’s about 20 weeks pregnant now.

    “Continuing the pregnancy,” the petition read, “puts her at high risk for severe complications threatening her life and future fertility, including uterine rupture and hysterectomy.”

    Cox wanted this pregnancy, and hopes to become pregnant again—a fact that the judge cites in her reasoning for granting the order.

    “The idea that Miss Cox wants desperately to be a parent, and this law might actually cause her to lose that ability is shocking, and would be a genuine miscarriage of justice,” Judge Guerra Gamble said Thursday. The Zoom hearing lasted just 45 minutes.

    “It is not a matter of if I will have to say goodbye, but when,” Cox said in her petition. “I do not want to continue the pain and suffering that has plagued this pregnancy. I do not want to put my body through the risks of continuing this pregnancy. I do not want to continue until my baby dies in my belly or I have to deliver a stillborn baby or one where life will be measured in hours or days, full of medical tubes and machinery.”

    Cox is represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights. The organization is currently also representing 20 women and two doctors in a Texas Supreme Court case. They are arguing that pregnant people with medical complications have not been receiving proper care in the state. […]

    Link

  291. says

    Journalists at The Washington Post walked off their jobs in a one-day strike Thursday. [today]

    More than 750 staff members at the Post walked out, refusing to work for 24 hours in what they say is the “biggest labor protest at the company” in 48 years.

    The Washington Post Newspaper Guild announced in a letter to readers Tuesday that its members will be participating in a one-day strike after management refused to “bargain in good faith” on issues including pay equity, pay raises, remote work policies and mental health resources.

    Employees have planned a picket and rally outside the Post’s downtown Washington office and asked readers to refrain from reading the newspaper and website for the day.

    Union members are protesting the stalemate with management that has left workers without a contract for 18 months, the Post’s staff writes.

    The strike comes nearly two months after the company announced it has plans to cut more than 200 jobs through voluntary buyouts.

    According to Sarah Kaplan, chief steward and bargaining committee member for the guild, management claimed its most recent offer to employees was its “last, best and final” offer but employees “will tell you that the company’s offer is simply not good enough.”

    The offer from management, the guild says, does not include wage increases, fails to guarantee mental health benefits and “does not engage with a host of other open issues that are important to Post Guild members.”

    William Lewis, former CEO of Dow Jones and the publisher of The Wall Street Journal, is preparing to step into the role of the Post’s new CEO and publisher next month. Fred Ryan, the company’s former CEO, stepped down earlier this year.

    In a letter announcing the strike, the union said its members have reported through difficult times and “made The Post lucrative again,” despite “our former publisher’s bad business decisions.” Post employees took the brunt of the economic hardship instead of executives, the letter said.

    It states that the news organization can’t stay competitive, retain talent and produce “the kind of elite journalism you rely on” without giving staff a fair deal.

    “We’re demanding that the Post come back to the bargaining table and continue negotiating until we reach a truly fair agreement,” Kaplan said in an emailed statement to The Hill.

    The company has made clear it will be able to print and deliver its newspapers as normal Thursday and Friday. Kaplan told the Post that she expects editors will “still try to get a paper out” on Thursday but they can’t “get a good paper out without us.”

    After several successful years under the ownership of Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, the newspaper has experienced a drop in audiences and subscribers and left executives looking to reduce its staff. The company is projected to take a $100 million loss by the end of the year.

    Link

  292. says

    Sen. J.D. Vance demands Justice Department investigate Trump-critical Washington Post editorial

    On Nov. 30, Washington Post Editor-at-Large Robert Kagan wrote an extended opinion piece arguing that Donald Trump is on a “clear path” to establishing a dictatorship in this country, and that because the Republican Party and what were once “conservative” establishments are backing him from every side there would be little possibility of stopping him should he win reelection.

    There would be no real checks on that power. At most, Kagan suggested, Democratic state governments could wage legal resistance to new federal mandates as “a form of nullification.” They could “refuse to recognize the authority of a tyrannical federal government” in some limited situations. An example might be state refusals to abide the promised “mass deportation” of millions of residents, many of them American citizens from birth.

    But Kagan darkly concluded that Trump could soon have the power to jail his political opponents, purge government workers who do not pass Trump-centric loyalty tests, and make good on all the other dictatorial threats he and his Republican allies have vowed to make happen.

    On Wednesday, Republican Sen. J.D. Vance sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and Secretary of State Antony Blinken asking that Kagan be investigated and potentially jailed for writing the editorial, which Vance suggested could be “an invitation to ‘insurrection,’ a manifestation of criminal ‘conspiracy,’ or an attempt to bring about civil war.”

    You do not need to wonder whether Trump will have Republican Party support for his plan to jail political detractors and scrub free-speech protections for the press. Other Republicans are even more eager than he is.

    Posted by readers of the article:

    Vance is providing a timely reminder that when a fascist regime takes over (Trump/GOP), one of the first casualties is always the free press.
    ————————–
    What he is demanding is nothing more than pure authoritarianism. It is like the Pre-Civil War period when Southern Senators demanded a Gag Order on any discussion of the Slavery Question.
    ————————-
    Apparently the most important freedom is the freedom to take away the freedoms of people you disagree with.

  293. says

    […] “There are no safe zones in Gaza,” James Elder, a Unicef spokesperson, told the BBC. “These are tiny patches of barren land. They have no water, no facilities, no shelter from the cold, no sanitation.”

    Elder’s quote underscores the limitations that civilians in the region now face because of the Israeli government’s military offensive and because of longstanding restrictions on people’s movement. All told, Gaza is 140 square miles, smaller than a third the size of the city of Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles Times. Its residents are limited in their ability to leave Gaza due to an ongoing blockade the territory has been under since 2007 and because Israel and Egypt, its two bordering countries, have refused to take in refugees. Mobility is also challenging since airstrikes have damaged roads in the territory and fuel remains extremely scarce. […]

    “If you are going to forcibly evacuate people, you cannot send hundreds of thousands [of] people to places where there is no water and no toilets. I genuinely mean no toilets. Every corner I had turned to, there was another 5,000 people who would appear overnight. They don’t have a single toilet, they don’t have a drop of water,” Elder said of his experience visiting Gaza. According to a physician Elder spoke with in Gaza, “safe zones will become zones of disease.” […]

    The growing displacement of people across Gaza has raised humanitarian concerns even further, as the numbers that populate al-Mawasi are only expected to rise.

    “This is an apocalyptic situation now because these are the remnants of a nation being driven into a pocket in the south,” UN undersecretary-general for humanitarian affairs Martin Griffiths told the Guardian. Elder’s dire assessment echoes this sentiment, highlighting how rampant overcrowding, ongoing airstrikes, and major supply shortages are continuing to put civilians in Gaza at serious risk.

    Link

  294. Reginald Selkirk says

    Iowa’s Caitlin Clark casually reflects on breaking 3,000 career points: ‘That’s not what it’s about’

    Iowa Hawkeyes star Caitlin Clark … the first player in Division I men’s or women’s basketball history to reach 3,000 points while also registering at least 750 rebounds and 750 assists…

    A nice achievement, and the season is nowhere near over, but it’s one of those made-up combo meal records. I had to dig to find this:
    List of NCAA Division I women’s basketball career scoring leaders

    Kelsey Plum (Washington 2013-2017) 3527 total points
    Kelsey Mitchell (Ohio State 2014-2018) 3402
    12 others not named Kelsey or Catlin
    and then Caitlin Clark

    List of NCAA Division I women’s basketball career rebounding leaders

    Courtney Paris (Oklahoma 2005-2009) 2034 rebounds
    Caitlin Clark not even in top 25

    Likewise, the assists record is 1307 (Suzy McConnell, Penn State 1984-1988)
    Clark #19 on list

  295. says

    Senate Republicans Block Bill To Ban Assault Weapons As US Sets Record For Mass Shootings.

    Oh, yes, and there was a mass shooting at UNLV yesterday, too, but when isn’t there.

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/senate-republicans-block-bill-to

    Republicans in the US Senate Wednesday put the kibosh on a Democratic bill that would have reinstated the 1990s-era assault weapons ban. In a completely coincidental bit of timing, there was also a mass shooting on the campus of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, which left three victims dead and one hospitalized in critical condition, later upgraded to stable. The shooter died at the scene after being confronted by police, but CNN reports it’s not yet clear whether he was shot by police or killed himself. The killer appears to have been a business professor who had applied for a job at UNLV but was turned down.

    The Democratic motion, introduced by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, would have reauthorized the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban — authored by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein — that expired after 10 years, during the George W. Bush administration. Supporters of the ban note that the country had fewer mass shootings while it was in effect, although detractors say the data weren’t conclusive. After 2004, when the ban ended, mass shootings increased sharply, and if White Christian Nationalists were choosing a new symbol to replace the cross, they’d probably go with the outline of an AR-15 because it’s so manly and aggressive. […]

    Schumer’s unanimous consent motion to debate the bill was blocked by Sen. John Barasso (R-Wyoming), who bravely defended the poor innocent weapons by invoking the Holy Second Amendment and objecting to any attempt at “trying to label responsible gun owners as criminals.”

    He has a point. According to a 2022 National Institute of Justice study, right up until they pull the trigger in a classroom, office, or dining room, 77 percent of America’s mass shooters purchased at least some of their guns legally, at least in cases where gun origins were known (32.5 percent of cases couldn’t be confirmed).

    The latest Republican move to protect assault weapons came days after the USA set a new record for the most mass killings by guns: Over the weekend, shootings in Texas (five killed) and Washington state (an apparent murder-suicide with five total deaths) bring us to 632 mass shootings as of today, by the Gun Violence Archive’s definition of a mass shooting as any shooting in which four or more people are shot, regardless of deaths. Shooting deaths from all causes, the Gun Violence Archive reports, are at 40,164 in 2023 so far. Slightly over half of those are suicides. (Reminder: The National Suicide and Crisis Hotline number is 988.) […]

  296. says

    Mike Johnson Knows Who Is Just Like Moses, It Is Himself

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/mike-johnson-knows-who-is-just-like

    Thinking you’re the main character is God’s story is a special kind of insane.

    Is there a holiday going on where God’s clearance rack white conservative men celebrate by comparing themselves and their friends to people who are way out of their league? This morning, we had the story of Steve Bannon comparing his dear friend and forever not-so-secret Santa Mike “Pillow” Lindell to Taylor Swift. It’s probably a comparison you’ve thought of before, they are so similar.

    Now somebody has nominated himself as the new Moses. Surprise, it is lunatic Christian extremist Mike Johnson, the least qualified House speaker in human history.

    Why is Mike Johnson a lot like Moses, you might be wondering? Did Moses have an app on his phone that told him when his son was liable to be rubbing one out because his son was currently visiting Pretty Neat Boobies Dot Com? […]

    Johnson was the keynote speaker at the rightwing extremist National Association Of Christian Lawmakers annual Bible-pounding awards gala on Tuesday night, and he explained how God had chosen him to be the new “Moses” American Girl doll: [video at the link]

    “I’ll tell you a secret, since media is not here.” (“Thank you for not allowing the media in,” Johnson added, alleging that journalists have been taking his comments “out of context” with “great joy for the last few weeks.”)

    Rolling Stone says maybe he didn’t know they were recording it for the group’s Facebook page. Idiot.

    But if Johnson wants to avoid being “taken out of context” by people who quote him verbatim and cite that as incontrovertible evidence that he’s a disgusting freak, he has the option to shut his wordhole and leave public life.

    “Look, I’m a Southern Baptist, I don’t wanna get too spooky on you,” he said, provoking some laughter from the attendees. “But, you know, the Lord speaks to your heart.”

    Maybe it’s heartworms.

    The message he received from God, Johnson said, was to prepare for a “Red Sea moment” — both for the Republican conference “and in the country at large.” Johnson said found the directive confusing but he continued to seek the counsel of God.

    Maybe God was just screwing with him. Maybe it was gas.

    “The Lord began to wake me up, through this three-week process, in the middle of night to speak to me,” Johnson insisted.

    LMAO. This mediocre zero among men think God takes time out of bibbity-bobbity-boo-ing planets into existence and giving angels love-pats on their bottoms to talk to him. Why would God do that?

    In all seriousness, it’s illustrative of what we’re dealing with that dudes like this really truly are brainwashed to believe they’re the main characters in God’s story. Horrifying, and illustrative.

    “Now at the time,” he continued, “I assumed the Lord is going to choose a new Moses.”

    And that New Moses would come from the white fascist American Republican party. You bet.

    But because of his own lesser rank among the GOP’s leadership, Johnson said, he believed the heavenly message to be: “You’re gonna allow me to be Aaron to Moses,” citing the role of the Old Testament prophet’s brother and biblical sidekick.

    Mike Johnson originally assumed the Lord was tickling his balls in the middle of the night to tell him he’d be New Moses’s wingman, the guy who we guess would accompany New Moses when he was out looking for strange. But God was like “No, Mike. I have different plans for you, my chosen guy who spends all his time being mad at gay buttsex.”

    And then the Holy Spirit started laughing and God was like SHUT UP YOU DICK and the Holy Spirit shut up but he was still laughing under his Holy Spirit breath.

    But then Johnson watched as candidate after candidate failed to generate the necessary Republican support to win the Speakership. “Ultimately 13 people ran for the post. And the Lord kept telling me to, ‘Wait, wait, wait,’” Johnson recalled.

    All that rake-stepping failure as the Republicans tried for weeks to find one person they could agree on as speaker? That was God’s plan, says Mike.

    Wouldn’t have imagined God was such a clownfuck. Never meet your heroes, we guess.

    “So I waited, I waited. And then at the end … the Lord said, ‘Now step forward.’”

    And then the Lord beeped and said the weather report and reminded Mike Johnson that it was time to take his medicine and that there was a package from Amazon on the front porch.

    Johnson regaled the audience with his surprise to be tapped as the Moses figure: “Me?” Johnson said. “I’m supposed to be Aaron.” But that was not the message, Johnson insisted, recalling: “‘No,’ the Lord said, ‘Step forward.’”

    […] This person who is second in line to the presidency is severely unwell.

  297. says

    Followup to comment 400.

    […] Reminder: Mike Johnson believes America is “dark and depraved,” and that God is fixin’ to do something very bad to it, because we guess Mike Johnson’s God is very angry and thin-skinned and has zero self-control, like a toddler.

    Mike Johnson is particularly incensed right now that “one-in-four high school students identifies as something other than straight.” He labors under the delusion that this is something over which he and other white fascist Christians can exercise control, both in society and in their own households. He and his fellow book-burners believe that if they can prevent kids from being “exposed” to LGBTQ+ people or TV shows or books, their kids, and other people’s kids, will not be LGBTQ+.

    What a deplorable fool.

    This guy is clearly fuckbonkers, but he’s also extremely dangerous. Handmaid’s Tale references are trite and overdone, but if anybody in American political life fits the archetype of the commanders, it’s this dude and the contemptible scumbags who surround him.

    If you love America, it’s your patriotic duty to mock the living shit out of him daily.

    Same link as comment 400.

  298. says

    U.S. celebrities were tricked into recording videos later doctored into anti-Zelenskyy propaganda

    The videos were edited to appear as if they were originally posted on Instagram.

    Pro-Russia propagandists tricked multiple American celebrities into recording videos which were then doctored and used to try to discredit Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, according to NBC News’ review of the videos and a new report from Microsoft.

    Recordings of at least five American celebrities — Elijah Wood of the ‘Lord of the Rings,’ Elvis Presley’s ex-wife Priscilla Presley, “Breaking Bad” actor Dean Norris, “The Office” actor Kate Flannery, “Scrubs” actor John McGinley and System of a Down bassist Shavo Odadjian — appeared to have been purchased on Cameo, where all the celebrities have accounts, and turned into propaganda through strategic video editing.

    Cameo is a service that lets users pay celebrities to record short, customized online videos. It’s not known who was behind the campaign that tricked the celebrities on the service.

    The doctored videos have flourished on Russian social media since this summer. NBC News found them repeatedly uploaded to VK, Russia’s counterpart to Facebook, and Telegram, a Dubai-based social media platform popular in Russia.

    The videos do not appear to be viewable on the public Cameo pages belonging to the celebrities, but Woods’ representative confirmed that the source of the doctored videos of the star was a Cameo request.

    In each of the doctored videos, viewed by NBC News, the celebrities address the camera directly. They usually speak about a person named “Vlad” about a substance abuse problem, and overlaid text falsely indicates the celebrities are referring to Zelenskyy. Other watermarks overlaid on the videos falsely indicated that the videos were uploaded to the celebrities’ Instagram profiles, rather than sent privately via Cameo. None of the celebrities mention Zelenskyy by name or otherwise indicate he’s the subject of the video.

    In another version of the propaganda, the audio of a Mike Tyson Cameo was replaced with music, and overlying text falsely claims he too suggested Zelenskyy go to rehab.

    The doctored videos received substantial misleading news coverage in Russian news media, including from RIA Novosti, Sputnik and Russia-24, which are state-owned news agencies and often reflect the Kremlin’s perspective. The outlets all painted a false picture of Hollywood pleading with Zelenskyy to get help.

    There is no indication that Zelenskyy has substance abuse problems, and the claim that he does is a commonly debunked theme in anti-Ukrainian disinformation.

    [Screengrabs from doctored videos of U.S. celebrities and actors.]

    According to Microsoft’s report on the propaganda effort, “Kremlin officials and Russian state-sponsored propaganda have long promoted the false claim that” the Ukrainian president “struggles with substance abuse; however, this campaign marks a novel approach by pro-Russia actors seeking to further the narrative in the online information space.”

    In an emailed statement, the press service of the Ukrainian president’s office said that “Russia has been waging an information war for many years — not only with Ukraine, but with the whole world at various levels.”

    […] Representatives for Wood, Flannery and Presley said that the actors simply recorded those videos thinking they were helping a fan with addiction, and had no intention of denigrating Ukraine or its president.

    “The request was submitted through Cameo and was in no way intended to be addressed” to Zelenskyy “or have anything at all to do with Russia or Ukraine or the war,” Wood’s representative said.

    “Kate unequivocally, 100% supports Ukraine and this has been very upsetting,” Flannery’s representative said.

    “It was not intended to be addressed” to the Ukrainian president “or have anything at all to do with Russia or Ukraine or the war,” Presley’s representative said.

    A representative for Tyson said, “The current videos being circulated are false. Mr. Tyson has zero involvement with providing information and creating such content.”

    Woods’ and Tyson’s Cameo pages both now say the celebrities are “temporarily unavailable” for Cameos.

    The videos highlight a fundamental vulnerability with Cameo, where celebrities often can rack up thousands of dollars in a few hours recording videos for fans. While the videos are usually intended for a small audience, they are oftentimes reshared on social media, and there is no mechanism preventing them from being widely shared if the performer is tricked into saying something embarrassing or that can be taken out of context.

    A Cameo spokesperson declined to comment on whether it was investigating the campaign, but said the use of the service to trick content creators violates its community guidelines. “In cases where such violations are substantiated Cameo will typically take steps to remove the problematic content and suspend the purchaser’s account to help prevent further issues,” the spokesperson said.

  299. says

    Loyal, angry, and ready to break the law: How Trump plans to staff his Cabinet

    In a lot of ways, it’s a dream job: good pay, great benefits, lots of power, and the ability to break the law with impunity. All it requires is surrendering your soul to Donald Trump.

    Axios reports that Trump is laying out his plans for assembling a new Cabinet. Those plans are centered around one thing: loyalty to Trump. Experience is not a requirement. Knowledge is not a requirement. And certainly, morality is right out. What Trump wants is a Cabinet willing to, in Axios’ words, “stretch legal and governance boundaries.”

    Someone who wants to be a dictator “on day one” is recruiting a Cabinet of thugs willing to break the law to enforce his will. And some of those potential Cabinet members are already bragging about just how far they will go to protect Trump’s authoritarian rule.

    […] goals at the top of their agenda: jail perceived opponents (including critics, government officials, and journalists), create vast internment camps for immigrants, and invade Mexico. At the same time, they would revise—or simply ignore—rules about tenure, hiring, and job requirements, allowing them to purge the government of career workers and restaff with those loyal to the regime.

    The election results in 2016 were a shock to almost everyone, Trump included. He was clearly unprepared to select Cabinet members and still uncertain about his authority. Trump was reportedly “surprised” at the scope of his duties and didn’t realize that his transition team would be charged with replacing the existing White House staff. Trump’s transition team was forced to turn to officials from Barack Obama’s administration to learn about the necessary positions.

    Trump’s transition team was a mixture of budding Trump loyalists—like Rudy Giuliani, retired Army General Michael Flynn, and then-Rep. Marsha Blackburn—and Republicans like Chris Christie, then governor of New Jersey, who would never quite agree to down the full cup of Kool-Aid. With former Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus nudging him along, Trump made choices that seemed primarily focused on finding the options that he thought would most piss off liberals, like putting coal lobbyist Andrew Wheeler in charge of the Environmental Protection Agency or turning over the State Department to Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson.

    Even then, it was all Trump’s team could manage to keep the top chairs filled with appointees and “acting” appointees. Three years into Trump’s reign, Politico reported that agencies were still pockmarked with unfilled positions. Even at that point, 170 out of 714 “key positions” had no nominee.

    Trump was unprepared, his team was inexperienced, and neither of them understood the vital roles that these appointees played. As a result, Politico said that the missing staff positions “limited Trump’s influence.”

    That’s why a large focus of both Trump’s Agenda47 and the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 is on preselecting and pretraining those who would take those key positions should Trump return to power. If Trump is going to be a dictator on day one, he’ll need the crew necessary to turn his dictates into action.

    Some of those who are bragging about their positions in a coming Trump dictatorship are Stephen Miller, Sen. J.D. Vance, and former Trump administration official Kash Patel. Axios also reports that Steve Bannon may come along to sweat on the White House upholstery.

    Patel has been explicit in saying that he expects to be director of the CIA. And, as The New York Times reports, he is relishing the idea of using the power of the intelligence community to go after journalists. “We will go out and find the conspirators, not just in government but in the media,” said Patel. “Yes, we’re going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections — we’re going to come after you.”

    Patel’s threats disregard both the First Amendment and limits on the ability of intelligence agencies to spy on American citizens. However, when it comes to existing rules and regulations … Trump doesn’t care. When it comes to the law, he’s already made it clear that he has a pardon pen at the ready. In his first visit to the Oval Office, Trump pardoned or commuted sentences for Flynn, Steve Bannon, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Dinesh D’Souza, Conrad Black, George Papadopoulos, Christopher Collins, Paul Erickson, Robert Hayes, George Gilmore, William “Ed” Henry, and Steve Stockman. For friends of Trump, laws are simply not an obstacle. That will be even more true if he’s given a chance for a do-over.

    Axios notes that while Trump hasn’t settled on specific names for most positions, he has his eye on a group that is “almost all older, white men” whom he sees as loyal enough to fill slots in a second Trump Cabinet. These are not people who have experience in government. There are no John Kellys in this group, and Trump is done with expressing his love for “my generals.” These are straight-up Trump loyalists who are prepared to be yes-men—no matter what the question is.

    More women appear when it comes to whom Trump is considering for a running mate. The list includes delusional former weathercaster and failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, Trump devotee Marjorie Taylor Greene, and fancy podium-owner and Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders. The list of VP potentials also includes former Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson—though there are signals that Trump considers Carlson a risky choice because he has too many followers of his own.

    How bad could another Trump administration be? Try out this prospective list:

    Attorney general: Stephen Miller or Jeffrey Clark

    Chief of staff: Steve Bannon

    CIA director: Kash Patel or John Ratcliffe

    Secretary of state: Ric Grenell or Jared Kushner

    Defense secretary: John Ratcliffe or Sen. Tom Cotton

    If it seems like any of these names might be hard to push through a Senate that maintains even a minority of Democrats, don’t worry—Trump has already said he’s willing to stick with acting Cabinet positions and skip Senate confirmation.

    In 2016, Trump’s transition team was hastily assembled, and there were still some involved who tried to select staffers based on a perception of experience or skill. That won’t happen a second time around. There also won’t be any open slots or concerns about career employees trying to enforce the law. Everything will be filled, top to bottom, with the most frothing Trump loyalists with just one purpose: to make sure he never hears the word “no.”

    The 2025 Trump transition team is already engaged. Should Trump win, they will be ready for America’s last peaceful transition of power.

  300. KG says

    Anyone outwith the UK may not have noticed the fresh outbreak of internecine sttrife and proto-fascism in the Tory Party. The topic is the government’s “batshit crazy” plan to transport asylum seekers who have arrived by “illegal routes” (all the legal ones having been pretty-much closed) to that famous dictatorshipdemocracy, Rwanda, for which they intend to pay the Rwandan government £150m or thereabouts. (“Batshit crazy” i’s how it was apparently described by the new Home Secretary, James Cleverly – the well-known and respected one-man refutation of nominative determinism – when he was Foreign Secretary not long ago.) The Supreme Court ruled that the plan is illegal, because Rwanda is not a safe place, and specifically, might send the transportees back to the places they fled from. So Sunak’s idea is to pass a law which says Rwanda is too a safe place, and that the UK’s Human Rights Act will be “disapplied” in respect to this plan, because asylum seekers are not really human. (OK, they didn’t actually say that, but they haven’t given any other justification.) But Tories even more vile and bonkers than Sunak, notably the former Home Secretary CruellaSuella Braverman, and the just-resigned Minister for Immigration, Robert Jenrick, say it doesn’t go far enough, and should also give the finger to the European Convention and Court of Human Rights, the UN Convention on Refugees, and any other international treaties the pesky courts might cite. So they may vote against the Bill when it comes to the Commons next week, as will most of the opposition parties. There’s a chance it may actually be defeated. Sunak has refused to make the vote a matter of confidence (which would mean any Tory voting against it would be expelled from the parliamentary party and could not stand for re-election as a Tory) but if he loses, the last shreds of his authority will be gone, and I think he’d pack it in: he must know he’ll be out anyway after next year’s election, he’s clearly neither up to the job nor enjoying it, he has more money than anyone could possibly need, and he went out of his way to butter up Elon Musk at the end of his ridiculous “AI safety” conference, so he’d probably be able to get a job as factotum to some tech lord if he wants something to make him feel he’s still important.

  301. says

    Biden sees Ukraine aid as a priority. But to get it, he must solve a vexing immigration puzzle.

    President Joe Biden has said his work to support Ukraine in its fight against Russia is among his signature accomplishments. Now the fate of funding America’s ally has become enmeshed with the most vexing policy challenge he’s faced in office: immigration.

    As the negotiations have played out on Capitol Hill, the White House has tried to paint themselves as uninvolved in the messy and complicated process of negotiating a legislative deal.

    But those familiar with the behind-the-scenes maneuvering reveal that Biden aides are deeply and directly involved in trying to guide the process and shape an outcome to Biden’s liking.

    “I am willing to make significant compromises on the border,” Biden said in remarks on Wednesday. “We need to fix our broken border system. It is broken. And thus far, I’ve gotten no response” from Republicans.

    Immigration advocates warn that Biden risks looking so desperate for Ukraine aid that he is willing to placate Republicans by bargaining away the basic rights of migrants looking to escape horrendous conditions at home for a better life in the U.S.

    […] A deal that shows progress in fortifying the border could potentially win over moderate and independent voters who blame Biden for images of migrants sleeping on city sidewalks with no place to go.

    […] On Wednesday, Republicans blocked the Senate from advancing a bill written by the Biden administration that would provide Ukraine aid and approve money to support Israel and Taiwan. That bill would have also strengthened border enforcement on the U.S.-Mexico border, including 1,000 new border patrol agents; 1,600 asylum officers to hear migrant claims; and enhanced technology to track the flow of goods at ports of entry.

    In an address Wednesday before the Senate vote, Biden said he has been reasonable and remains open to compromising with Republicans when it comes to stricter border policies […]

    Inside the White House, Homeland Security Adviser Liz Sherwood-Randall, deputy chief of staff Natalie Quillian and Domestic Policy Council Director Neera Tanden have been trying to determine what additional immigration policy changes are necessary to get the bill over the finish line in the Senate.

    The White House did not make officials involved in the talks available for comment. A White House aide referred to press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s comments at a press briefing on Wednesday when asked for comment.

    “A strong bipartisan majority of Congress supports Ukraine in its fight against Putin’s brutal war,” Jean-Pierre said. “Unfortunately, some Republicans are now holding urgently needed Ukraine funding hostage to a set of completely unrelated … border demands. Instead of negotiating in good faith, as a group of Democrats and Republicans have been doing for some weeks now, they’re doubling down on an all-or-nothing approach.”

    […] Biden also directly with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., about Ukraine funding before Thanksgiving. McConnell has publicly agreed that funding Ukraine remains an urgent priority. But under pressure from his right flank that insisted on tying Ukraine funding to immigration limits, McConnell has embraced the view that Biden must link them, suggesting it’s both good policy and also in his political interests.

    […] Both Biden and McConnell face internal party pressures. If Biden complies with Republican demands, he risks alienating pro-immigration progressives and Hispanic advocacy groups who describe the conservative proposals as an attempt to shut down legal pathways to the U.S. And if he rebuffs the GOP and holds firm, he could lose all Republican support and tank the aid package that he says is necessary to keep Ukraine in the fight.

    Part of Biden’s dilemma is his lack of obvious GOP negotiating partners. He and his White House have no history with recently elevated Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. […]

    The White House has latched onto one proposal that appears to enjoy bipartisan support on Capitol Hill: toughening the “credible fear” standard that migrants use to make their case to an officer for asylum when they arrive at the border, the immigration advocate familiar with the negotiations said.

    Currently, when migrants appear at the border and claim asylum under the “credible fear” standard, the main criteria used to decide if one can remain in the U.S. and continue through the process is whether there is a significant possibility that subsequent hearings will determine they face persecution in their home country or a fear of it.

    […] “I am concerned that there is a rush to legislation in response to Republicans holding Ukraine aid hostage,” the source added.

    If Republicans agreed that changing the standard was enough, the bill would “pass tomorrow,” the source said. But many Republicans, including in the House, argue that it isn’t enough of a concession from the administration, the source said.

    Those Republicans say they also want sharp limits on the president’s powers to grant humanitarian parole in asylum cases — the provision that allows the executive to temporarily admit foreign nationals due to an emergency.

    […] Biden expressed his frustration behind closed doors Tuesday, telling supporters at a fundraiser in Boston that Republicans are holding up Ukraine aid unless “we follow the most draconian actions possible to keep migrants out of America.”

    “I don’t think they want to solve it,” he said of the nation’s migration challenges. “I think they want to keep it as a problem without the tools to make it any better.” [Yep. That sounds right to me.]

    An administration source close to the deliberations said that Biden hasn’t shied from making tough decisions on immigration policy that aren’t always popular with his political base. This person also noted that the politics of the issue have “shifted” some in his party, as Democratic mayors and governors have been outspoken in calling for tougher policy as well.

    On Thursday, lawmakers said talks had resumed. [Good. At least they are talking.]

    […] Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., said Tuesday the White House should be more publicly involved, including summoning negotiators to the White House.

    “I think it’s not surprising that we’re getting to a point where this is going to be negotiated at the highest level of the White House and here in the Senate as well,” he said.

  302. says

    NBC News:

    Israel says its forces are in the heart of the southern Gaza Strip’s main city, Khan Younis, and encircling the home of top Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, who is thought to be hiding underground. … Palestinian civilians are fleeing the fighting at Israel’s urging, but residents and aid groups have warned there is nowhere safe to go and a dire lack of supplies.

    NBC News:

    As Israel’s military assaults southern Gaza above ground in pursuit of Hamas leaders, it is also considering a plan to disable the militant group’s vast labyrinth of underground tunnels by flooding them with seawater, two U.S. officials told NBC News.

  303. says

    NBC News:

    A former California police chief who called for the execution of Donald Trump’s political enemies, joined the U.S. Capitol attack and then spread conspiracy theories about Jan. 6 was sentenced to more than 11 years in federal prison on Thursday.

    […] Alan Hostetter, who was found to have carried a hatchet during the Capitol attack, cited Vivek Ramaswamy’s suggestion at Wednesday’s GOP debate that Jan. 6 was an “inside job.”

    […] Hostetter, who was the chief of the La Habra, California, Police Department in 2010, was arrested in June 2021.

    Like GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and many far-right members of Congress, Hostetter has spread conspiracy theories about the Jan. 6 attack. Ramaswamy said, without evidence, during the Republican debate on Wednesday night that Jan. 6 “now does look like it was an inside job,” while Hostetter said during his trial that he believed “that the entire thing was staged.” […]

    Link

  304. says

    Axios:

    The White House on Wednesday announced $4.8 billion in student debt relief for some 80,300 people. … That brings the total approved student debt cancellation by the Biden administration to $132 billion for more than 3.6 million Americans.

  305. says

    NBC News:

    The Biden administration is putting pharmaceutical companies on notice, warning them that if the price of certain drugs is too high, the government might cancel their patent protection and allow rivals to make their own versions.

  306. says

    Media create ads helping greenwash the fossil fuel industry and hurting reporter credibility

    […] Drilled, an award-winning website dedicated to focusing on climate accountability, […] was founded six years ago by veteran climate reporter Amy Westervelt, who The New York Times should have hired instead of Bret Stephens. Stephens is the longtime climate science denier who claims to have had an epiphany after he visited Greenland last year. Scientists citing rigorous evidence showing Greenland’s ice sheet is melting just wasn’t as convincing to him as propagandists who rejected the very physics of the greenhouse effect.

    As co-reported by Matthew Green and Joey Grostern at the 18-year-old DeSmog, a politics-of-the-climate-crisis website that also deserves to be on your list of must-reads—and co-published by The Nation and The Intercept—Drilled on Tuesday laid out their investigation into major, trusted news outlets regarding the in-house backshops producing “misleading promotional content for fossil fuel companies […] Known as advertorials or native advertising, the sponsored material is created to look like a publication’s authentic editorial work, lending a veneer of journalistic credibility to the fossil fuel industry’s key climate talking points.”

    Here’s Westervelt and Green:

    The enormous influence oil and gas executives are wielding at COP28 has thrown commercial partnerships between media outlets and the fossil fuel industry into sharper focus. Climate reporters at every outlet we analyzed have diligently covered the challenges that the industry’s so-called solutions face, but when that reporting is placed alongside corporate-sponsored content touting the technology’s benefits, it leaves readers confused. […]

    News outlets’ in-house ad agencies haven’t just helped greenwash the fossil fuel industry’s preferred climate solutions in the leadup to COP28. Over the past three years, the Financial Times’ FT Commercial team has created dedicated web pages for various fossil majors, including Equinor and Aramco, along with native content and videos, all focused on promoting oil and gas as a key component of the energy transition. FT’s recent Energy Transition Summit platformed talking points from executives at BP, Chevron, Eni, and Essar. At The Economist’s 2020 Sustainability Week event, BP featured as a platinum sponsor, while Petronas and Chevron sponsored the magazine’s Future of Energy Week in 2022.

    Politico is one of the most consistent publishing partners for the fossil fuel industry. Over the past three years, it has run native ads more than 50 times for the American Petroleum Institute, the most powerful fossil fuel lobby in the U.S.; organized 37 email campaigns for ExxonMobil; and sent dozens of newsletters sponsored by BP and Chevron, the latter of which also sponsors Politico’s annual “Women Rule” summit. Since 2017, Shell has sponsored every one of Politico’s Energy Visions events (and companion web series), which examines “the politics and issues driving the energy transition conversation.”

    According to data from Media Radar, The New York Times took in more than $20 million in revenue from fossil fuel advertisers from October 2020 to October 2023 — twice what any other outlet earned from the industry. That number is due largely to the paper’s relationship with Saudi Aramco, which brought in $13 million in ad revenue during that three-year period, via a combination of print, mobile, and video ads, as well as sponsored newsletters.

    The team interviewed climate reporters (who asked for anonymity to protect their jobs). They labeled the selling of advertorials and event sponsorships to fossil fuel companies as “gross,” “undermining,” and “dangerous.” Worse still, “Not only does it undermine the climate journalism these outlets are producing, but it actually signals to readers that climate change is not a serious issue,” one climate reporter said.

    There are, of course, other media signals to readers on that score. Like how often climate crisis stories make it to the front page or into staff or guest commentaries on the opinion pages. The same applies, even more so, to mainstream broadcast and cablecast outlets, where the climate crisis is lucky to get a couple or three minutes a week in primetime. And all too often, even these forays into the subject contain overly much “on the other hand” reporting.

    To be fair, there are excellent climate reporters doing good work at each of the sources Westervelt, Green, and Grostern scrutinized. This is a big improvement over the not-so-long-ago days when practically every climate story put lying deniers on an equal footing with climatologists. But even now it’s always clear that climate coverage, even as watered down as it frequently is after a reporter turns in their copy, is not as valued by the media powers-that-be as other coverage. And while it’s true that advertising and editorial divisions are structurally independent at these media, it’s just a bit hard to accept that this tendency of editors to underplay the climate crisis is totally unconnected to fossil fuel propaganda, some of which those media themselves create.

  307. CompulsoryAccount7746, Sky Captain says

    @lotharloo #394:
    A guest on a Sam Harris podcast? Get a shocked face ready. /s

    Wikipedia – Yuval Noah Harari, Critical Reception

    His work has been more negatively received in academic circles
    […]
    [An anthroplogist’s book review] of Sapiens […] “one has often had to point out how surprisingly little he seems to have read on quite a number of essential topics. It would be fair to say that whenever his facts are broadly correct they are not new, and whenever he tries to strike out on his own he often gets things wrong, sometimes seriously.” […] “we should not judge Sapiens as a serious contribution to knowledge but as ‘infotainment’ […] dotted with sensational displays of speculation, and ending with blood-curdling predictions about human destiny. By these criteria, it is a most successful book.”
    […]
    magazine Current Affairs [on] his books: “The best-selling author is a gifted storyteller and popular speaker. But he sacrifices science for sensationalism, and his work is riddled with errors.”
    […]
    [A German newspaper noted] an “icy deterministic touch” in his books which made them so popular in Silicon Valley. […] celebrated him like a pop star, even though he only had the sad message that people are “bad algorithms”, soon to be redundant, to be replaced because machines could do it better.

  308. Reginald Selkirk says

    Fox News panelist touted as “Democrat voter” outed as anti-vax activist who hates Democrats

    A “Democrat voter” that Fox News invited to discuss former President Donald Trump’s Iowa town hall is actually a “politically homeless,” anti-vaccine activist who has said Democratic candidates “are an automatic no-no for me” and that she was “voting down ballot Republican” in last year’s midterm elections, The Daily Beast reports. The voter, Stephanie Edmonds, appeared on a “Fox & Friends”-hosted panel of six voters on Wednesday morning about Trump’s Tuesday night event. Afterward, liberal watchdog Media Matters for America revealed that Edmonds, the panel’s alleged lone Democrat, is a political activist who has publicly rebuked Democrats for years…

  309. says

    Oh yes. I read Yuval Noah Harari and was aghast at how awful and naive it was. It reminded me of Robert Ardrey’s ill-informed crap from the 70s — pop sci advocacy for a weird regressive perspective. Harari is making a lot more money than Ardrey ever did, though.

  310. KG says

    PZM@419,

    I didn’t get as far as reading Harari – I read the blurb to “Sapiens” and thought “That’s going to be pseudoscientific crap”.

  311. KG says

    Lynna, OM@298, 305, The Vicar@304,
    There’s an excellent and detailed video about the allegations of systematic rape of Israeli women on October 7th here. Novara Media is a small UK outfit which has been very good on the war and the propaganda battles around it.

  312. KG says

    Further to my #406, apparently (this is from both UK and Rwandan government sources) it was the Rwandan government that insisted Sunak’s Transportation for Life without Trial Bill should not overtly promise to break international law. It’s also emerged that an additional £100m has been paid to Rwanda and a further £50m is to be paid next year, bringing the total to £290m. That does not include the cost of chartering planes, paying or hiring “muscle” to force the victims onto them and off again, or fighting legal cases. All this for performative cruelty at the expense of at most a few hundred victims – Rwanda can’t house more in the facilities earmarked for that use.

    The vast majority of immigration to the UK is of people invited to come, to take up jobs for which British applicants cannot be found, notably in the health and care sector; or of students whose fees keep British universities afloat. The government is also trying to restrict those flows, not because they aren’t beneficial, but purely for (what they think will be) political advantage. A particularly outrageous measure is a huge increase in the amount a British citizen has to earn before they can bring in a foreign spouse or child, up to nearly £40,000 – well above the median salary; this will force the permanent split-up of families. It is appalling that there should be any such requirement at all – it means whether you are a British citizen with full rights depends on your income. The worthless Labour Party will not denounce this measure, merely whimpering that the exact amount should be considered.

  313. Reginald Selkirk says

    A Massive Repair Lawsuit Against John Deere Clears a Major Hurdle

    A judge rejected John Deere’s motion to dismiss a landmark class action lawsuit over the agricultural giant’s repair monopolies, paving the way for a trial that will determine whether the company’s repair practices are illegal. The case will specifically examine whether Deere has engaged in a “conspiracy” in which Deere and its dealerships have driven up the cost of repair while preventing independent and self-repair of tractors that farmers own…

  314. Akira MacKenzie says

    @ 425

    Yes, because nothing says “Friendly competition and good will” by allowing some of the most tyrannical and murderous regimes in human history join in the fun.

  315. birgerjohansson says

    PZ Myers @ 419
    Another (potentially) controversial author: Max Tegmark.
    He is part of a group who contains some kooks, but Tegmark himself is a bona fide researcher- what is the consensus about Tegmark’s books?

    I.am trying not to do guilt by association.

  316. says

    Would House Republicans seriously consider expelling Matt Gaetz?

    The GOP-led House took the extraordinary step last week of expelling former Rep. George Santos. The next question is whether the New York Republican might soon have some company.

    Two months ago, Fox News raised a few eyebrows with a report that said House GOP members were “preparing a motion to expel” Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida. The report didn’t include any on-the-record comments, and it wasn’t independently verified by other news organizations, but it raised the prospect of a provocative move against a member with a dwindling number of friends.

    The chatter seemed to dissipate soon after, though USA Today published a related report overnight.

    Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., continues to draw the ire of his Republican colleagues in the House weeks after he led the ouster of Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., from the speakership, and some of his detractors have privately floated expelling him from Congress.

    […] As for what the Floridian’s intra-party opponents would use as a vehicle to move against him, there’s an obvious answer, which The New York Times highlighted in October:

    Representative Matt Gaetz’s successful push to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy has cemented his status as one of the most reviled members of the House of Representatives — including among many of his fellow Republicans — and drawn attention to a long-running investigation by the House Ethics Committee into Mr. Gaetz’s conduct.

    [T]he Ethics Committee launched its probe into Gaetz two years ago, and by all accounts, the investigation appears to be near its end. It’s difficult to speculate as to what, if anything, the panel will conclude, but for those hoping to move against Gaetz, this offers an opportunity — especially given the fact that House members just used the Ethics Committee’s findings as the basis for Santos’ expulsion.

    “There were a number of people who voted to expel Santos with the express intent of thinking through the precedent there on what happens next,” one unnamed GOP member reportedly told USA Today. “There was a lot of forethought about the precedent and what would happen when a report on Gaetz comes out.”

    The same report quoted another House Republican saying, “If there’s anything in [the Ethics Committee’s report on Gaetz] that’s bad, I can guarantee people will have their fangs out. He is hated in our conference. If he comes back as guilty in this ethics thing, I think he’s in trouble.”

    Maybe.

    I don’t doubt that many GOP members have intense feelings about the Floridian, but I can’t help but dwell on the arithmetic in the chamber.

    As recently as eight days ago, the House Republican conference had 222 members, which meant on any given vote, the majority could only afford to lose four of its own members. After Santos was expelled, the conference was left with 221. After former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy exits later this month, the number will fall to 220. Though there’s some ambiguity as to when Republican Rep. Bill Johnson of Ohio will step down to become Youngstown State University’s new president, it’s possible we’ll soon see the GOP conference shrink to 219.

    With these numbers in mind, just how eager would House Republicans be to choose to oust Gaetz?

    Republican Rep. Troy Nehls recently conceded that the Ethics Committee’s findings related to Santos looked “pretty damaging,” but the Texan added, “[W]hy would we want to expel a guy … [when] we’ve got a three-seat, four-seat majority. What are we doing?”

    No one should be surprised to hear similar attitudes in response when the Ethics Committee releases its findings on Gaetz.

  317. tomh says

    NYT:
    Appeals Court Upholds, but Narrows, Gag Order on Trump in Election Case
    By Alan Feuer / Dec. 8, 2023

    A federal appeals court on Friday largely upheld the gag order imposed two months ago on former President Donald J. Trump in the criminal case accusing him of plotting to overturn the 2020 election, but narrowed its terms to allow him, among other things, to go after Jack Smith, the special counsel who has filed two indictments against him.

    In its ruling, a three-judge panel of the court struck a cautious balance between protecting many of the people involved in the federal case in Washington from Mr. Trump’s relentless attacks and giving leeway to the former president to speak his mind while he is running for office. The ruling permits Mr. Trump to continue asserting that the prosecution is a political vendetta and to directly criticize Mr. Smith, the public face of the prosecution.

    The three appellate judges — all of whom were appointed by Democratic presidents — wrote that they agreed “that some aspects of Mr. Trump’s public statements pose a significant and imminent threat to the fair and orderly adjudication of the ongoing criminal proceeding, warranting a speech-constraining protective order.”

    But the order issued by the lower court, they said, “sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary.”

    The ruling by the panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was the latest — but perhaps not the last — step in a protracted battle over the gag order, which was put in place in mid-October by the trial judge, Tanya S. Chutkan. Mr. Trump’s lawyers have promised to challenge any remaining portions of the order all the way to the Supreme Court.

    While gag orders are not uncommon in criminal prosecutions, the order imposed in the election interference case has resulted in a momentous clash. Mr. Smith’s prosecutors have sought to protect themselves and their witnesses from Mr. Trump’s “near-daily” social media barrages, while the former president has argued that the government has tried to censor his “core political speech” as he mounts another bid for the White House…

    When Judge Chutkan first imposed the order after a contentious hearing in Federal District Court in Washington, she sought a middle ground between these competing claims with what she believed was a narrowly tailored decision.

    Her order forbade Mr. Trump from publicly maligning Mr. Smith or any members of his staff, and any court employees or potential witnesses involved in the matter. But it permitted him to criticize the Justice Department, President Biden and herself. It also allowed him to maintain that the prosecution itself was a partisan retaliation against him.

    The appeals court altered Judge Chutkan’s order by barring Mr. Trump from making any public statements about “known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses,” but only about matters that concerned their participation in the case. It also added a new prohibition that forbade Mr. Trump from commenting on the relatives of lawyers or court staff members involved in the case if the remarks were intended to interfere with how the trial participants were doing their jobs.

  318. says

    Reginald @429, that article is full of Republicans making stupid excuses … and they are not really acknowledging the seriousness of the situation.

    Text quoted by tomh @430:

    The ruling permits Mr. Trump to continue asserting that the prosecution is a political vendetta and to directly criticize Mr. Smith, the public face of the prosecution.

    Sorry to see Trump given that leeway.

    Her order forbade Mr. Trump from publicly maligning Mr. Smith or any members of his staff, and any court employees or potential witnesses involved in the matter. But it permitted him to criticize the Justice Department, President Biden and herself. It also allowed him to maintain that the prosecution itself was a partisan retaliation against him.

    The appeals court altered Judge Chutkan’s order by barring Mr. Trump from making any public statements about “known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses,” but only about matters that concerned their participation in the case. It also added a new prohibition that forbade Mr. Trump from commenting on the relatives of lawyers or court staff members involved in the case if the remarks were intended to interfere with how the trial participants were doing their jobs.

    Once again, sorry to see Trump given that much leeway. Still, I understand that the courts are trying to protect first amendment speech rights.

  319. says

    Ken Paxton Is Being Awful Again: After a Texas state judge issued a restraining order to allow a woman to get an abortion under one of the state’s very narrow exceptions to its abortion ban, Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) issued a statement threatening health care providers who complied with the court order.

    […] The case showcases how exceptions to abortion bans are hard to invoke, difficult to navigate, and by the nature of their ambiguity give very little legal cover to doctors and hospitals.

    Paxton exploits those difficulties by threatening to prosecute anyone who helps the plaintiff in the case. Note that chilling last line from his statement: “The TRO will expire long before the statue of limitations for violating Texas’ abortion laws expires.”

    Link

  320. says

    Tucker Carlson turns a sober warning of Russian threat into a false claim of extortion

    Speaking before Congress on Tuesday, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the House Foreign Affairs Committee that failing to stop Russia in Ukraine could mean much greater costs in the future. That included the possibility of deploying U.S. troops to Europe should Putin invade a NATO ally.

    Republican representatives present at the event seemed to get it. As The Messenger reports, House Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul understood Austin’s warning. “If [Vladimir] Putin takes over Ukraine, he’ll get Moldova, Georgia, then maybe the Baltics,” McCaul said following the briefing. He noted that the idea of more troops on the ground in Europe was “what we’re trying to avoid.”

    However, by Thursday, fired Fox News pundit and Putin supporter Tucker Carlson had distorted Austin’s words into what Carlson insisted was an attempt at extorting further aid for Ukraine. Writing on X (formerly Twitter), Carlson claimed that Austin threatened to send “your uncles, cousins and sons to fight Russia” unless more money was handed over to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Not surprisingly, every word of this was a lie—a lie even Fox News has debunked.

    Fox’s chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin responded that Carlson’s claim was “100 percent not true.” What Austin said was what many officials have said from the outset: Failing to stop Russia in Ukraine invites Putin to expand his ambitions to other countries in Europe.

    None of the language that Carlson used in his post has been confirmed by any other source. That didn’t stop X owner Elon Musk from wading in to reply, asking Carlson, “He really said this?” to which Carlson replied, “He really did. Confirmed.”

    Except no. Had Austin actually said this before a Republican-led House committee, Congress members would have emerged from the room boiling mad, and it would have been the major story of the day. They didn’t, and it wasn’t, because Austin never made the statement Carlson claims.

    In May, USA Today produced a timeline of Carlon’s extensive love affair with Russia. It includes such highlights as Carlson claiming that American liberals hate America more than Putin and claiming that reporters interfered in the 2016 election more than Russia because they released “the Access Hollywood tapes.” And there’s this: [video at the link]

    Carlson is now deliberately attempting to fuel conspiracy theories around U.S. support for Ukraine and weaken the Ukrainian military. As Carlson was posting his false claims, Austin was in Ukraine, where he spoke with Zelenskyy and informed him that no more assistance was forthcoming unless Congress appropriated additional funds.

    Warnings like the one Austin delivered in Congress have been a constant feature of military analysis since the illegal, unprovoked invasion of Ukraine began on Feb. 24, 2022. […]

    Russian leadership has threatened that the war will continue into Poland, the Balkans, and even Germany and the U.K. Putin wants to crush the West, write his name in the history books, and restore the Russian empire.

    What Austin said isn’t extortion, or even controversial. If Putin is allowed to benefit from an illegal invasion, he will do it again. Right now, the Ukrainian army is doing an amazing job of smashing Russian forces and destroying thousands of tanks, armored vehicles, and aircraft. But they are fighting an enemy that vastly outnumbers them in manpower, equipment, and wealth. They cannot succeed without sustained assistance.

    If he wins in Ukraine, Putin will next bring the war to an allied nation that the U.S. has sworn to defend using our own forces. The cost of that will be vastly greater than anything being provided to Ukraine and if Congress doesn’t act, that’s where the world is headed.

    That’s not extortion: That’s the truth. And it’s why Russian state media is thrilled about what Republicans have been doing to block funding for Ukraine—and why Putin has sent his congratulations to Republicans for their work in blocking Ukrainian assistance.

    Tucker Carlson is Putin’s puppet.

  321. says

    Followup to comment 433.

    […] Senate Republicans’ performative tantrum Wednesday, when they yelled at U.S. officials and stormed out of a classified briefing on Ukraine, “prompted jubilation in Moscow,” The Daily Beast’s Julia Davis, who closely monitors Russian media, reports. “During Wednesday’s broadcast of a state TV program 60 Minutes, Evgeny Popov said Ukraine was now in ‘agony’ and it was ‘difficult to imagine a bigger humiliation.’”

    During his morning show Full Contact on Wednesday, top pro-Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov joyfully noted: “[Janet] Yellen screamed, “Don’t you dare!” [Joe] Biden screamed, “Don’t you dare!” but Republicans said, “Go to hell! We won’t give your khokhols [slur for “Ukrainians”] any money.” The segment was entitled, “No one needs Ukraine anymore—especially the United States.”

    Appearing on his program, America analyst Dmitry Drobnitsky noted, “The downfall of Ukraine means the downfall of Biden! Two birds with one stone!”

    The Senate voted later that day to attempt to advance Ukraine funding, and every Republican voted to block it from even getting a final vote. That got the Russian pundits even more excited.

    […] Dmitry Abzalov, director of the Kremlin-affiliated Center for Strategic Communications, crowed that “deal about additional aid has collapsed” over border issues. […]

    Republican offers “still have all the extreme proposals like expulsion at the border with no asylum access. And fast track deportations in the interior.”

    Republicans are trying to rope President Joe Biden into the talks, apparently believing he’ll be more amenable to giving in to them. It’s not working so far. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Thursday that the congressional negotiations “should be happening” but said the GOP is “not moving forward in good faith.”

    Link

    All of this makes me wonder if Republicans were granted approval of their extreme border proposals, would they find another way to block Ukraine funding/support?

  322. says

    Harvard President Claudine Gay is apologizing for her responses to questions about campus antisemitism during a House hearing Tuesday, which led some to call for her resignation.

    Gay got into a heated back and forth with Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) on Tuesday after the lawmaker asked, “At Harvard, does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Harvard’s rules of bullying and harassment?”

    Gay said “depending on the context,” it could violate the policies and that “antisemitic speech when it crosses into conduct that amounts to bullying, harassment, intimidation — that is actionable conduct and we do take action.”
    In an interview with student newspaper The Harvard Crimson on Thursday, she apologized for that interaction.

    “I am sorry,” Gay told the outlet. “Words matter.”

    “When words amplify distress and pain, I don’t know how you could feel anything but regret,” she added.

    The backlash has been swift and fierce against Harvard, as well as the other two colleges represented, with Stefanik and Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), both Harvard alums, saying Gay should resign.

    Rabbi David Wolpe announced Thursday he was resigning from Harvard’s advisory group that aimed to combat antisemitism, citing the environment at the university and Gay’s testimony.

    The White House declared it was “unbelievable that this needs to be said: Calls for genocide are monstrous and antithetical to everything we represent as a country.”

    “I got caught up in what had become at that point, an extended, combative exchange about policies and procedures,” Gay told the student newspaper. “What I should have had the presence of mind to do in that moment was return to my guiding truth, which is that calls for violence against our Jewish community — threats to our Jewish students — have no place at Harvard, and will never go unchallenged.”

    “Substantively, I failed to convey what is my truth,” she said.

    Link

  323. Reginald Selkirk says

    Trump expert witness paid nearly $900,000 for testimony in fraud case

    An accounting expert who came to Donald Trump’s defense in his $250m fraud has racked up nearly $900,000 in fees for his testimony, a court heard on Friday.

    New York University Stern School of Business research professor Eli Bartov testified on Thursday that he had found “no evidence here of concealment” in his review of the financial statements at the heart of the case…

  324. Reginald Selkirk says

    Chinese garlic is a national security risk, says US senator

    A US senator has called for a government investigation into the impact on national security of garlic imports from China.

    Republican Senator Rick Scott has written to the commerce secretary, claiming Chinese garlic is unsafe, citing unsanitary production methods…

    It sounds like he is in the pocket of Big Allium.

  325. Reginald Selkirk says

    Boaters plead guilty in riverfront brawl; charge dismissed against riverboat co-captain

    Two white boaters on Friday pleaded guilty to harassment charges in connection with an Alabama riverfront braw l that drew national attention.

    The two men pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor charge as part of a plea deal, according to court records. The August riverfront melee in Montgomery drew national attention after bystanders filmed white boaters hitting a Black riverboat co-captain and then crew members and bystanders rushing to his defense. Video of the fight was shared widely online, sparking countless memes and parodies.

    A judge on Thursday also dismissed an assault charge filed by one of the white boaters against the riverboat co-captain. The Montgomery Police Department said the co-captain was a victim in the assaults…

  326. says

    Ukraine Update: It’s the drones. That’s the problem, by Mark Sumner

    On Monday, The Washington Post ran a lengthy article focusing on the frustrations between the U.S. and Ukrainian militaries as Ukraine prepared for its 2023 counteroffensive. The U.S. advisers were frustrated that the Ukrainians didn’t accept their plans for how to best use the gear that American and other Western allies had provided. The Ukrainians were frustrated that the Americans didn’t acknowledge the challenges and limitations Ukraine was facing on the ground.

    Even as U.S. officials, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, were pressing Ukraine to use the kind of combined arms tactics that Western militaries had been training to conduct for decades, Ukrainian military officials, including Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov, were protesting that they lacked air support and simply didn’t have the experienced troops to make these strategies work. The U.S. wanted Ukraine to mount one big attack. Ukraine worried about Russia concentrating forces and wanted to make multiple attacks to keep them spread out.

    But in the end, it’s not clear that any of it mattered. And the reason is drones.

    We’ve been talking about drones almost from the day Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine began, when the large Bayraktar TB2 drone helped deliver some of Ukraine’s very first successes. In May 2022, The New Yorker called the Bayraktar “the drone that changed the nature of warfare” and noted that “In the defense of Ukraine, Bayraktar has become a legend, the namesake of a baby lemur at the Kyiv zoo, and the subject of a catchy folk song, which claims that his drone ‘makes ghosts out of Russian bandits.’”

    But a year later, Defense News ran an article titled, “Are the once-vaunted Bayraktar drones losing their shine in Ukraine?” In that article, the Bayraktar was said to be of “limited utility” against improved Russian air defenses. Over that year, the drone that had once been all over Ukrainian reports of field actions had all but disappeared. “For the TB2, I don’t want to use the word useless, but it is hard to find situations where to use them,” said one Ukrainian commander.

    Similarly, when Russia first obtained Shahed-131 and Shahed-136 drones from Iran, they became a terror for Ukraine. Rather than directing the drones at military targets, Russia launched them in nighttime waves against Ukrainian cities. On the first several of those nights, the drones were absolutely devastating, and were responsible for hundreds of civilian casualties. However, over time the Shahed drones became less effective. A big part of that was that Russia insisted on shooting them at cities where Ukraine was able to install more and more air defense systems, but as Ukrainian gunners also got more experience with shooting down the relatively slow-flying drones, they became easier targets even where there wasn’t an air defense battery on hand.

    But there’s another reason the Bayraktar and the Shahed are getting less press these days. It’s the same one we talked about in August:

    Over the weekend, four of those [Russian] Su-30 jets, along with a MiG-29, were destroyed by a squadron of aircraft launched from Ukraine. Those aircraft were made from cardboard and rubber bands.

    It’s even more visible on yesterday’s chart of losses recorded by OSINT analyst Andrew Perpetua. [List at the link]

    Look at what’s been taken out along the left side of the chart: tanks, artillery, armored vehicles, supply trucks. Now look along the right-hand column and see what left them dead or damaged on the battlefield. On this single day, at least 45 large pieces of mobile equipment were immobilized by drones that probably maxed out in price at around $1,000. There’s just one custom-made Russian Lancet drone on the list. Everything else was taken down by either an FPV drone driven by someone wearing VR goggles or a quadcopter drone dropping an explosive. The quadcopters started out as dominant, but now the FPV drones are far and away the most common.

    When I made the first field guide to drones in this war in November 2022, FPV drones did not even get a mention. A year later, they aren’t just the most common drone on the field, they are the most important weapon in this fight.

    Right now, FPV drones are extremely cheap. Training someone to use one requires about as much effort as teaching them to play Mario Kart, and they can carry explosives powerful enough to take out a tank. Skilled FPV operators—and both sides are growing an ever-larger group of skilled operators—can fly one of these drones into an open hatch, through the door of a house, or into the most protected areas of a trench.

    If they spot you, they can kill you. And they can hover a few hundred feet in the sky, unseen and unheard, until they spot you.

    Drones in 2023 are where trenches were in 1914. There are a lot of them. They are getting more numerous by the day. They are defining the nature of combat. And no one knows how to stop them. Current levels of anti-drone equipment, whether that’s specially designed guns or electronic warfare, are patently unable to put a dent in what’s happening at the front in Ukraine.

    FPV drones are playing a huge role in making every potential advance into a nightmare.

    Yes, minefields certainly played a role in stopping Ukraine from making a genuine breakthrough along the southern front. So did artillery. But that’s only because those minefields were backed by ubiquitous surveillance drones guiding both FPV drones and artillery strikes.

    It doesn’t matter whose strategy you use. Russian meat waves, Western combined arms, or Ukraine’s something-in-between: Any effort to break through right now is at the mercy of hundreds, if not thousands, of FPV drones swarming every moment like nightmare hornets.

    Someone will figure this out. We can only hope it’s Ukraine.
    ————————————
    Here we are again in Avdiivka with a map that looks very much like the last Deep State map we saw of this area over a week ago. [map at the link]

    Looks are deceiving in this case. In fact, they are deceiving for a couple of reasons.

    Since the last time we visited Avdiivka, Ukraine has pushed across those rail lines east of Stepove (top center in this map) and threatened a concentration of Russian forces in that area. Then Russia spilled back across the rail line at three points, capturing most of Stepove and driving about half a kilometer out into the fields to the south. Then Ukraine came back and pushed Russia back again. And that’s the second deceptive thing because as far as I’m aware, Ukraine’s position at the moment is much better than this map reflects. Ukrainian forces surged through Stepove and those empty fields, driving Russia back across the rails at the north end, liberating most of the remains of Stepove village, and largely clearing the wooded areas on the flanks of the rails.

    What may be more surprising is that they did this not with FPV drones, not with liberal use of artillery, and not with the kind of small unit infantry tactics we’ve seen frequently in this area. Most accounts of Ukraine’s advance in this area single out just one type of vehicle. [Tweet and video at the link]

    In the past few weeks, there has been increasing praise for the Bradley from Ukrainian sources. Unlike Western tanks, which have sometimes been magnets for Russian drones and artillery as soon as they appear on the scene, the Bradleys have been agile, effective, and done a fantastic job of protecting their crews.

    And don’t forget, they’re also great on the inside. (A definite warning for those who watch this video to the end.) [Tweet and video at the link]

    The U.S. happens to have a lot more Bradleys available (an estimated 2,000 in storage). If only we could send them.
    ————————————-
    [Tweet and image at the link: “Ukrainian Advent Calendar: Day 8

    Today, we thank our partners from @DeptofDefense for their leadership in supporting Ukraine. We are especially grateful for M2 Bradley IFVs.

    M2 Bradley serve as both an armored personnel carrier and a tank-killer. Its 25 mm autocannon effectively destroy the enemy and helps our soldiers liberate Ukrainian land.

    New Weapons of Victory coming soon!”]

  327. says

    NBC News:

    Palestinians fled the Gaza Strip’s second-largest city of Khan Younis in the south of the territory as Israel’s forces were encircling the home of top Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar on Thursday. Sinwar is thought to be hiding underground. The encirclement comes as Israel’s military continues its military campaign against Hamas in all of the Gaza Strip.

    Associated Press:

    The United States vetoed a United Nations resolution Friday backed by almost all other Security Council members and many other nations demanding an immediate cease-fire in Gaza, where Palestinian civilians are facing what the U.N. chief calls a ‘humanitarian nightmare.’

  328. says

    NBC News:

    Vladimir Putin on Friday moved to prolong his repressive and unyielding grip on Russia for at least another six years, announcing his candidacy in the presidential election next March that he is all but certain to win, according to state media reports.

  329. says

    NBC News:

    Much has been made about how Americans feel bad about the state of the economy, even though according to many broad-based statistical measures things are pretty good. It looks like that message has sunk in to some extent, as a widely followed reading of consumer opinion jumped in December and ended a four-month streak of declines.

  330. says

    New York Times:

    Twenty-four of the so-called fake Trump electors now face criminal charges in three different states, and one of the legal architects of the plan to deploy them, Kenneth Chesebro, has emerged as a witness in all of the cases.

  331. says

    Washington Post:

    Donald Trump has told advisers he would like to attend the inauguration of Argentina’s new president-elect, Javier Milei, this weekend, although logistical hurdles make the visit unlikely, according to two people familiar with the matter. A handful of Republican House members will go to Buenos Aires for the swearing-in. Several House conservatives have discussed the possibility of inviting the erratic libertarian political leader to address the chamber, said two other people familiar with those internal discussions, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity to reflect private deliberations.

  332. says

    Ukraine’s imposing top lawmaker launches a charm offensive in Washington DC

    The first thing apparent about Ruslan Stefanchuk, the head of the Ukrainian Parliament, is his imposing size.

    Dressed in all-black, military-style fatigues, Stefanchuk was a towering figure this week standing next to American officials and lawmakers who barely reached his shoulders.

    In his first trip to Washington this past week, Stefanchuk held meetings with the White House, the Pentagon and Capitol Hill as part of a senior Ukrainian delegation advocating for continued American support for Kyiv, and as he put it, “looking the interlocutors in the eyes.”

    “I came here to share Ukraine’s successes, and I came to say that Ukraine still needs the support and we can’t stop halfway,” he said in an interview with The Hill, speaking through a translator.

    While Stefanchuk gives off the impression of a brick wall, he is a seasoned politician and quick to provide a smile and a handshake. He was elected chair of the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s Parliament, in October 2021.

    […] Stefanchuk is first in the line of succession should Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky be unable to serve, which seemed a distinct possibility in the early days of Russia’s full-scale invasion, when assassins reportedly stalked the streets of Kyiv to kill the president.

    Biden officials have said they are supporting Ukraine for as long as it takes to resist Russian President Vladimir Putin’s goal of subsuming the country. But Zelensky’s senior aides are facing tough questions in Washington about Ukraine’s military strategy for victory and its use of billions of dollars in advanced, Western-supplied armor and firepower — especially as their generals suggest the war is at a stalemate.

    Stefanchuk was in Washington this past week alongside Andriy Yermak, the head of the office of the President of Ukraine, and Ukraine’s Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, among other officials.

    “Ukraine is currently preparing a very detailed action plan that includes the timelines and that includes the financial resources to deliver the expected results,” Stefanchuk said, amid warnings from Kyiv that it needs more and better weapons to shift the war.

    “We are getting ready to share this plan with our partners,” he added, but he would not provide any more details. [Photos at the link are kind of funny. Stefanchuk looks massive next to American politicians.]

    House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has drawn a hard line with the White House, saying additional funding for Ukraine is “dependent upon enactment of transformative change to our nation’s border security laws.”

    Stefanchuk, commenting on his meeting with Johnson at an event at the Atlantic Council on Thursday, said he is “convinced” the Speaker “will do everything possible to enact the assistance to Ukraine as soon as possible.”

    “The meeting with Speaker Johnson was very warm and quite friendly, and I want to thank Speaker Johnson for — we found some common ground in all matters,” he told the Washington-based think tank.

    […] Even as a majority of Republican lawmakers support funding for Ukraine, a handful of hard-line conservatives have earlier demonstrated they can freeze House business over their demands. If the Senate is able to hammer out a deal that links aid to Kyiv and border reforms, some Ukraine skeptics in the House have said a border bill would need to be passed first, before Ukraine aid.

    […] Ukraine’s Republican supporters recognize the stakes as Congress heads toward Christmas vacation having yet to deliver on Biden’s fiscal 2024 national security supplemental funding request. The entire request reaches nearly $111 billion, including priorities for Ukraine, Israel, the Indo-Pacific and immigration.

    […] The European Union has pledged more economic assistance than the U.S. ($83 billion compared to $25 billion) during the war, according to the Kiel Institute Ukraine Tracker, but the EU has only delivered 31 percent of the total commitments, compared to the U.S. delivering 87 percent of its commitments.

    […] Hungary’s right-wing prime minister Viktor Orbán is blocking EU efforts to follow through on a five-year economic commitment of 50 billion euros (about $54 billion).

    […] Partnerships with China, Iran and North Korea and ties with Gulf nations part of the OPEC group of oil-producing nations have helped Putin survive.

    […] Ukrainian officials point to their success in pushing Russia off of an estimated 50 percent of territory since the start of the Kremlin’s full-scale invasion on Feb. 24.

    […] Stefanchuk rejected that Ukraine would trade any territory as part of a peace deal with Russia.
    “Our position is absolutely clear, and as of now, the only diplomatic negotiations that can be held with Russia are the negotiations on the terms of Putin’s capitulation,” he said.

    […] “Ukraine really appreciates the bipartisan support that it has been enjoying, and it’s really important that the U.S. continues to support us because Ukraine’s best sons and daughters are dying today protecting the democratic values.”

  333. tomh says

    WaPo:
    Texas Supreme Court temporarily halts order that allowed pregnant woman to have abortion
    By Maegan Vazquez / December 9, 2023

    The Texas Supreme Court on Friday temporarily halted an order allowing a woman who is 20 weeks pregnant to get an abortion — reversing a lower-court ruling that marks the first case of a pregnant woman seeking a court order for the procedure since Roe v. Wade was overturned last year.

    The order was issued Friday night.

    The case involves Kate Cox, a 31-year-old mother of two from the Dallas area, who asked the nonprofit Center for Reproductive Rights for legal help in obtaining an emergency abortion in Texas after she learned last week that her fetus had Trisomy 18, also called Edwards syndrome. The genetic condition is one “that cannot sustain life,” as Cox wrote in an op-ed Wednesday in the Dallas Morning News. Almost all such pregnancies end in miscarriage or stillbirth, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Babies who do survive often die prematurely.

    Cox’s doctor warned that carrying the pregnancy to term could jeopardize her health and future fertility, including uterine rupture and hysterectomy, according to the lawsuit filed on her behalf.

    On Thursday, Travis County District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble, an elected Democrat, granted a temporary restraining order that would allow Cox to have an abortion under the narrow exceptions to the state’s ban. But Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) asked the Supreme Court of Texas to intervene to block Cox from obtaining an abortion…

    In a letter addressed to the hospitals where the doctor involved in the case had admitting privileges, Paxton on Thursday had threatened to take legal action if Cox had an abortion in the state. He contended that Cox’s doctor did not meet “all of the elements necessary to fall within an exception to Texas’ abortion laws” and that the judge was “not medically qualified to make this determination.”

    Paxton said the Travis County judge’s order would not excuse the hospital or doctor from civil or criminal liability “including first degree felony prosecutions.” He added that the temporary restraining order “will expire long before the statute of limitations for violating Texas’ abortion laws expires.”

    Doctors who perform abortions could be sentenced to five or more years in prison in many states. In Texas, they could go to jail for life.

  334. KG says

    Houston Oasis, a secular nonprofit of self-identified atheists, agnostics, humanists and spiritualists – Reginald Selkirk@442 quoting Chron

    Spiritualists???

  335. StevoR says

    Via BBC News :

    In the misty mountains of Alishan in central Taiwan, there is a flower that is said to be a gateway to the gods.

    The Dendrobium orchid, or golden grass orchid, grows in clumps of between 10 and 20 on glossy green canes. A yellow flower with a velvety orange-fringed centre, it is beautiful but odourless. To the indigenous Tsou people, it is known simply as the God Flower.

    “My tribe has to have the God Flower for our ceremonies. Otherwise, God won’t be able to find us,” says tribal elder Gao Desheng.

    It was once found in abundance, flowering outside Tsou homes. But now the Tsou venture ever deeper and higher into the mountainous forests surrounding them in search of it. Sometimes, they even scale trees to find the God Flower.

    The tribe is convinced that climate change is to blame for this. The winter must be cold enough – below about 12C – for the buds to form, so they can bloom in the spring. The flowers mostly grow in warm temperate climates at altitudes of 800 to 1,800m (5,900ft).

    However based on local temperature data from the Alishan Weather Station, the environmental group Greenpeace says that minimum temperatures in autumn and winter have gradually increased over the past 10 years.

    Source : https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-67342419

    Plus this :

    The last meal of a 75-million-year-old tyrannosaur has been revealed by scientists – two baby dinosaurs. Researchers say the preservation of the animal – and of the small, unfortunate creatures it ate – shines new light on how these predators lived. It is “solid evidence that tyrannosaurs drastically changed their diet as they grew up,” said Dr Darla Zelenitsky, from the University of Calgary.

    The specimen is a juvenile gorgosaurus – a close cousin of the giant T. rex.

    Source : https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67642374

  336. Reginald Selkirk says

    China starts up world’s first fourth-generation nuclear reactor

    China has started commercial operations at a new generation nuclear reactor that is the first of its kind in the world, state media said on Wednesday.

    Compared with previous reactors, the fourth generation Shidaowan plant in China’s northern Shandong province is designed to use fuel more efficiently and improve its economics, safety and environmental footprint as China turns to nuclear power to try to meet carbon emissions goals.

    Xinhua news agency also said the 200 megawatt (MW) high-temperature, gas-cooled reactor (HTGCR) plant developed jointly by state-run utility Huaneng, Tsinghua University and China National Nuclear Corporation, uses a modular design…

  337. Reginald Selkirk says

    @193

    Hubble back in service after gyro scare—NASA still studying reboost options

    The Hubble Space Telescope resumed science observations on Friday after ground teams spent most of the last three weeks assessing the performance of a finicky gyroscope, NASA said.

    The troublesome gyroscope is a critical part of the observatory’s pointing system. Hubble’s gyros measure how fast the spacecraft is turning, helping the telescope aim its aperture toward distant cosmic wonders…

  338. Reginald Selkirk says

    GOP Star Tim Sheehy Forgot to Mention the Family Money in His ‘Self-Made’ Success Story

    Tim Sheehy, a GOP Senate candidate in Montana, has campaigned on being a self-made entrepreneur. But his new book details how much his family made it happen…

    While Sheehy and his wife had $300,000 in savings as seed capital for the enterprise he dreamed up in the early 2010s, he called his parents and asked for $100,000 which they had set aside for his college education. (Sheehy graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy, where tuition is free.)…

    Later, in 2015, the company was hard-pressed to find the $500,000 needed to purchase their first two airplanes. “I didn’t have half a million dollars,” Sheehy wrote. “We were doing everything on our own. And I needed help. As I had when I first started the business, I turned to my family.”

    While Sheehy writes that he worked out a deal to pay the seller some share of funds up front and the rest in quarterly installments, it’s clear that his father and brother provided the cash needed to seal the deal…

  339. Reginald Selkirk says

    Pregnant woman in Kentucky sues for the right to get an abortion

    A pregnant woman in Kentucky filed a lawsuit Friday demanding the right to an abortion, the second legal challenge in days to sweeping abortion bans that have taken hold in more than a dozen U.S. states since Roe v. Wade was overturned last year.

    The suit, filed in state court in Louisville, says Kentucky’s near-total prohibition of abortion violates the plaintiff’s rights to privacy and self-determination under the state constitution.

    The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, is about eight weeks pregnant and she wants to have an abortion in Kentucky but cannot legally do so because of the state’s ban, the suit said. She is seeking class-action status to include other Kentuckians who are or will become pregnant and want to have an abortion…

  340. says

    From Kate Riga, writing for Talking Points Memo:

    When the town criers in the pages of the Atlantic or the Washington Post pound the alarm on the struggle for democracy, they’re nearly always talking about Donald Trump and his quest for the White House. The battle for democracy is scheduled for November 5, 2024.

    But our slide into democratic decay has been happening long before Trump made the transition from celebrity-rich guy-famous asshole to politician. And it’s happened in perhaps the most devastating way through the mind-numbingly boring reorganization and manipulation of how voters are arranged throughout a state.

    “Redistricting,” “gerrymandering” — words I try to keep out of my headlines, as they inevitably presage a dip in readership — mostly at the hands of Republicans have all but wiped out democracy in many states. Look at Ohio or North Carolina or Wisconsin, ranging from leaning red to true tossups, over which Republicans have manufactured such ironclad control that their legislatures are virtually impossible for Democrats to win.

    That’s the first step to the barrage of right-wing legislation these lawmakers pump out, both altering the trajectory of their own states and becoming models for others. It’s how they became laboratories of autocracy, to crib from David Pepper.

    But Republicans are not content with the very effective tools they have. Having successfully reduced the Voting Rights Act to a shell of its former strength, they’re taking aim once again, hoping to strip it of what few protections it still affords to minority voters.

    In Georgia — where state Republicans have done the legal version of biting, kicking and letting their bodies go limp to avoid being dragged into creating a court-ordered additional Black majority district — the legislature just passed the final version of its “remedial” congressional map. They grudgingly created the new district, but also dismantled the one currently held by Rep. Lucy McBath (D-GA) to preserve the current 9-5 Republican House seat advantage.

    In McBath’s district, a coalition of Black, Latino and Asian voters typically elect Democrats. By producing this map despite U.S. District Judge Steve Jones warning them not to eliminate “minority opportunity districts elsewhere in the plans,” Georgia Republicans are directly challenging the idea that the VRA protects these coalitional districts the same way it does districts with a majority of one minority group.

    There’s an appellate court split on the question, and the Supreme Court hasn’t weighed in on it.

    Beyond general power lust, there’s a reason Georgia Republicans in particular are so threatened by these minority group coalitions. The state’s recent, and stunning, Democratic lean came on the backs of these voters diversifying the suburbs around the main metro areas. This is a newer trend that old Republican gerrymanders don’t address as well as they do urban pockets often densely populated by minority voters.

    Jones will react to the map in the coming days, and intends to order a court-drawn one if he rejects it.

    The war on democracy is already raging. And one side is hellbent on achieving absolute victory.

  341. says

    Followup to tomh @450.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has asked the state Supreme Court to intervene and stop a Dallas woman from having an abortion.

    Paxton’s office petitioned the high court just before midnight Thursday, after a Travis County district judge granted a temporary restraining order allowing Kate Cox, 31, to terminate her nonviable pregnancy. Paxton also sent a letter to three hospitals, threatening legal action if they allowed the abortion to be performed at their facility.

    On Friday evening, the state Supreme Court temporarily halted the lower court’s order but did not rule on the merits of the case. The court said it would rule on the temporary restraining order, but did not specify when.

    “While we still hope that the Court ultimately rejects the state’s request and does so quickly, in this case we fear that justice delayed will be justice denied,” said Cox’s lawyer, Molly Duane, in a Friday evening statement.

    […] “A Texas woman was just forced to beg for life-saving health care in court and now any doctor who provides her the care she urgently needs is being threatened with punishment including a lifetime prison sentence,” Escobar said in a statement. “This story is shocking, it’s horrifying, and it’s heartbreaking.”

    Link

  342. says

    Followup to comments 450 and 460.

    […] When possible, Republicans have enacted some of the most extreme abortion bans, and Texas has among the worst. But cases like this one, which expose the GOP’s cruel and heartless attitudes toward women, have further galvanized national opposition to the bans. […]

    In fact, Paxton’s unhinged response is beyond absurd, and must be read to be believed.

    Cox issued a statement, saying, “It is not a matter of if I will have to say goodbye to my baby, but when. I’m trying to do what is best for my baby and myself, but the state of Texas is making us both suffer.”

  343. says

    Followup, of sorts, to Reginald @299.

    Covid Hospitalizations on the Rise Again

    [graphs at the link] After more than three years of dealing with this seemingly never-ending pandemic that has now claimed nearly 1.2 million lives here in the US alone (and at least 7 million worldwide, though the true toll may turn out to be in the 10-15 million range), it looked like we had finally put Covid-19 in our rear-view mirror once and for all by this summer, with new hospitalizations falling well below 10,000 per week, according to the CDC Data Tracker. Indeed, following the most recent peak at the beginning of 2023, we had nearly 6 straight months of uninterrupted declines in both new hospitalizations and the weekly death toll.

    Unfortunately, starting in the Southeast (especially Florida) in the early summer hospitalizations started climbing again, with a nearly 4-fold increase by their peak in early September, and a corresponding 2.5-fold increase in the weekly death toll. And while this particular surge burned out fairly quickly in the Southeast, new hospitalizations and deaths never returned to their pre-surge levels, and by then it had already spread to most of the rest of the country.

    Still, at least through early November it didn’t look like things were getting any worse. But in the past month a new surge centered in the Great Lakes states (CDC Region 5) has really started to take off, with new hospitalizations now twice what they were a month before, and a whopping 7.5 times from their nadir six months ago.

    While no one is predicting this latest surge will be in any way comparable to the Omicron spike that was just starting up two years ago, it could easily equal or exceed what we saw last winter. So if anyone has been putting off getting the latest booster thinking it’s not something we still have to worry about, think again, particularly if you’re planning to get together with family/friends over the coming holidays.

  344. says

    Asteroid will pass in front of bright star Betelgeuse to produce a rare eclipse visible to millions

    Astronomers hope to learn more about Betelgeuse and Leona through the eclipse, which is expected to last no more than 15 seconds.

    One of the biggest and brightest stars in the night sky will momentarily vanish as an asteroid passes in front of it to produce a one-of-a-kind eclipse.

    The rare and fleeting spectacle, late Monday into early Tuesday, should be visible to millions of people along a narrow path stretching from central Asia’s Tajikistan and Armenia, across Turkey, Greece, Italy and Spain, to Miami and the Florida Keys and finally, to parts of Mexico.

    The star is Betelgeuse, a red supergiant in the constellation Orion. The asteroid is Leona, a slowly rotating, oblong space rock in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

    Astronomers hope to learn more about Betelgeuse and Leona through the eclipse, which is expected to last no more than 15 seconds. By observing an eclipse of a much dimmer star by Leona in September, a Spanish-led team recently estimated the asteroid to be about 34 miles wide and 50 miles long (55 kilometers wide and 80 kilometers long).

    There are lingering uncertainties over those predictions as well as the size of the star and its expansive atmosphere. It’s unclear if the asteroid will obscure the entire star, producing a total eclipse. Rather, the result could be a “ring of fire” eclipse with a miniscule blazing border around the star. If it’s a total eclipse, astronomers aren’t sure how many seconds the star will disappear completely, perhaps up to 10 seconds.

    “Which scenario we will see is uncertain, making the event even more intriguing,” said astronomer Gianluca Masa, founder of the Virtual Telescope Project, which will provide a live webcast from Italy.

    An estimated 700 light-years away, Betelgeuse is visible with the naked eye. Binoculars and small telescopes will enhance the view. A light-year is 5.8 trillion miles.

    Betelgeuse is thousands of times brighter than our sun and some 700 times bigger. It’s so huge that if it replaced our sun, it would stretch beyond Jupiter, according to NASA.

    At just 10 million years old, Betelgeuse is considerably younger than the 4.6 billion-year-old sun. Scientists expect Betelgeuse to be short-lived, given its mass and the speed at which it’s burning through its material.

    After countless centuries of varying brightness, Betelgeuse dimmed dramatically in 2019 when a huge bunch of surface material was ejected into space. The resulting dust cloud temporarily blocked the starlight, NASA said, and within a half year, Betelgeuse was as bright as before.

    Scientists expect Betelgeuse to go supernova in a violent explosion within 100,000 years.

  345. says

    Supreme Court conservatives believe witch hunters and slaveholders perfected human governance

    Last week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in another one of those cases that sounds pedantic but may or may not toss out a quarter of a millennium of American jurisprudence in favor of what old-timey English gentlemen might have thought about the matter in the spare moments between seances, bloodlettings, and selling their daughters off to prospective business partners.

    The case is SEC v. Jarkesy, and the astonishingly broad question the court wanted to ask is whether the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other government agency can impose fines or take other punitive actions against those who violate government regulations. The government says yes; the crackpot Fifth Circuit ruled that no, it turns out we’ve been doing it wrong for centuries now and the government doesn’t get to levy fines unless there’s a jury trial attached to every one of them.

    Balls and Strikes has the rundown:

    Jarkesy went to the right place: The Fifth Circuit issued an astonishingly broad ruling in his favor and determined on multiple constitutional grounds that the SEC doesn’t have the power—and, beyond that, that Congress can’t give it the power—to adjudicate cases in the usual way. Instead, the Fifth Circuit agreed that SEC enforcement actions that seek civil penalties have to go through jury trials in federal court. Relying on jury trials would make SEC enforcement actions much more costly and cumbersome, leading to fewer prosecutions for securities fraud and, thus, more fraudsters defrauding the American people. The SEC appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard the case, SEC v. Jarkesy, on Wednesday.

    Oral argument did not bode well for the future of the SEC and the millions of people it protects from the schemes of money-grubbing millionaires. Jarkesy’s counsel, S. Michael McColloch, argued that modern securities fraud charges are basically the same as common law actions recognized in the courts of England in 1791, when the Seventh Amendment was ratified. Justice Neil Gorsuch asked McCollocuh to compare claims then and now, and seemed satisfied with the response. “Those elements all match up,” Gorsuch said.

    Cutting to the chase, the Supreme Court’s conservatives were very interested in the argument that since people in England in 1791 thought differently than Americans have for the last 200+ years, the old time-y English version trumps all the American laws passed in the two centuries since. And that led the non-conservatives on the nation’s highest court to express a collective what the hell, because this entire premise of digging up 16th- to 18th-century English corpses and declaring them to be the final authorities on all legal matters forever has gone past a mere schtick and is now a fetish. And not a good fetish.

    Justice Elena Kagan pointed out that Congress enacted securities laws in response to modern financial crises specifically because founding-era common law actions were insufficient to prevent widespread harm. “When you say, well, we should go back to the common law suits that were brought 200 years ago in the courts of Westminster, is Congress’s judgment—after the Depression, after the Savings and Loan Crisis, after the Great Recession—is Congress’s judgment that more powers were needed within an administrative agency entitled to no respect?” she asked.

    Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also struggled to make sense of Jarkesy’s proposed standard, which represents a break from established law. Modern financial regulations created new statutory duties that bear no resemblance to two-century-old common law claims, she pointed out—here, among others, the duty “not to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud in the context of securities transactions.” And “if it’s a new statutory duty,” said Jackson, “we’ve held for forever that Congress can assign it to the administrative agency.” In other words, perhaps Congress can address new problems in ways that did not exist in 1791.

    [Kagan and Jackson are right.]

    The practical impact of a conservative decision here will be that overnight, the markets will become considerably more prone to fraud and petty swindles. Either regulatory agencies and federal courts will all have to expand dramatically in order to hear all of the securities fraud cases and other regulatory infractions, jury by jury, or the SEC and other regulatory agencies will have to drop the majority of their cases so that they can focus only on the worst handful.

    We know from listening to Republican and conservative caterwauling about efforts to undo their slow purge at the IRS that that’s the whole point. The conservative legal framework hasn’t had many consistent through lines since Antonin Scalia beat “originalism” to death with a shovel and buried it on a wealthy patron’s prairie estate, but conservative jurisprudence has been quite reliable in providing for one particular outcome: If it allows the upper classes to cheat, defraud, and steal with less effort and less risk of consequence than they had beforehand, that’s what conservative courtrooms will choose every time. It’s uncanny.

    What the nonconservative justices are so roused about, albeit in more dignified language than the rest of us need to abide by, is this increasingly glib rightist notion that 16th- to18th-century common law does not just inform U.S. laws passed from the Constitution onward, but preempts them—such that Congress, allegedly, has no power to write any law that would conflict with what a misogynistic English witch hunter or slave-murdering colonial plantation owner would abide, back in the days when legal rights were conferred to white landholding men and only white landholding men.

    […] In this telling of the American story, the American people themselves have no agency—ever. Congress has no agency, and neither do the courts. No law or regulation can exist that did not exist before the Constitution’s founding, barring a new amendment that explicitly encodes each and every one of them—and the amendments, too, are looked on with extreme skepticism.

    […] Drug-induced abortion was commonplace at the time of the Constitution’s writing, with now-famous recipes for abortifacients published for public use. This history proves the modern conservative fetish for banning abortion outright and for barring the mailing of abortion drugs across state lines to be explicitly contradictory to the “founders’ intent” and so is studiously ignored. Immigration was largely unregulated until the 1870s, so conservatives looking for support for each new draconian and xenophobic measure have had to similarly reinvent alternative histories.

    […] If you’re white, male, and rich, the law exists to thwart your enemies; if you’re none of those things, the law exists to thwart you.

    The Supreme Court’s conservative flank may well get their way with this notion that government agencies regulating markets that did not exist, structured in ways 18th-century wifebeaters and slave-rapers never envisioned, cannot include punitive measures except with jury trials attached. But it is distinctly abnormal, it goes against 200 years of well-solidified American laws written out since 1791, and it is bizarre in premise because it has long, long been established that participating in specific public markets and infrastructure comes with an agreement to abide by the regulation-specified rules—or you forfeit your right to participate.

    When you fail a driver’s test, you are not given the right to a jury trial to determine whether hitting a tree and injuring your instructor is or isn’t a valid reason to deny your license. Purchasers of our public airwaves are expected to abide by certain rules, including a great many technical specifications to ensure none of the licensers are bleeding into the spectrums of the others. It is a given that federal regulators are allowed to respond by levying fines against the cheats. Fines for illegal hunting and fishing, fines for disabling smoke detectors or otherwise violating building codes, fines for false advertising—the list is endless.

    Participating in regulated market activities is optional, and is not a right. There is no element of the law that requires you to participate, but participating does require you to abide by the regulations as they are spelled out. The aforementioned Jarkesy knew when he entered securities markets that defrauding investors would result in regulatory demands to return what was stolen and pay a fine for remediation, and implicitly agreed to it when he filled out each regulation-required bit of paperwork.

    […] this is what the Federalist Society ranks want to litigate: whether or not the people you’ve invested your money with are allowed to make off with it if you’re not also rich enough to invest in a full-scale lawsuit to claw it back.

  346. says

    Popular Christmas Songs Written By Jews Subvert Christmas Says Christian Nationalist Andrew Torba

    Christian nationalist Andrew Torba is putting a new spin on the Jews despoiling Christmas trope. Torba, the founder of Gab and an ultraconservative web commentator, has discovered [that] Jews are responsible for some of the greatest, most revered and enduring Christmas songs ever written. And that pisses him off!

    Blaming Jews for destroying Christmas is not a new phenomena amongst nativists and conservative Christians. Early in the last century, in a publication titled The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem, Henry Ford wrote: “Last Christmas most people had a hard time finding Christmas cards that indicated in any way that Christmas commemorated Someone’s Birth.” Ford’s musings were part of a widely distributed set of anti-Semitic articles published in the automobile magnate’s newsweekly during the 1920s. “People sometimes ask why 3,000,000 Jews can control the affairs of 100,000,000 Americans. In the same way that ten Jewish students can abolish the mention of Christmas and Easter out of schools containing 3,000 Christian pupils.”

    […] On his show, Torba theorized that “Christmas songs written by Jewish songwriters [w]as a means to secularize and de-Christianize the holiday, while simultaneously expressing pride in Jewish identity.”

    Smietana pointed out that

    “Drawing mainly from a review of ‘A Kosher Christmas’ in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz dating to 2012, Torba recounted how many of the season’s most popular songs [including] “White Christmas” [by Irving Berlin], “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” and “A Holly Jolly Christmas [by Johnny Marks], and “Let it Snow” [by Sammy Cahn and July Styne] were written by Jews.”

    […] the four songs mentioned above are the tip of the Holiday iceberg.

    For the record, here are a few more Christmas/Holiday flavored songs discussed by Albert:
    – “Chestnuts Roasting on an Open Fire” by pop-jazz singer Mel Torme;
    – “Santa Baby” by Joan Javits and Phil Springer, two composers;
    – “It’s The Most Wonderful Time of the Year” by George Wyle and Eddie Pola, two writers and musicians;
    – “Silver Bells” by Ray Evans and Jay Livingston, musical partners that met in college;
    – In addition to Rudolph, Marks also wrote “Rockin’ Around the Christmas Tree,” and “Silver and Gold”;
    – “Walkin’ In a Winter Wonderland” by Felix Bernard, a Jewish composer and conductor, along with his non-Jewish colleague, Richard B. Smith.

    Andrew Torba’s contended that these songs are aimed at kicking Christ out of Christmas, and turning the celebration of the birth of Jesus (not so coincidentally a Jew) into a winter holiday.. “Knowing this, how could you allow your household to be filled with this music?” Torba asked his listeners.

    Torba also fulminated against Hanukkah, wondering why American presidents celebrate it. “Wow, incredible, incredible, how this happened,” he said. “In a Christian nation, it takes this relatively minor Jewish holiday and turns it into this prominent holiday that is celebrated in our White House. Isn’t that something?”

    […] So what’s up with all these holiday songs written by Jews?

    Jonathan Sarna, professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University, told RNS’ Smietana that these songs “are more in the tradition of Dickens’ ‘A Christmas Carol’ than in the tradition of ‘Silent Night,’” he said.

    Smietana noted that “Jonathan Karp, who teaches history and Jewish studies at Binghamton University, said there’s no conspiracy involved with the success of Jewish writers of Christmas carols. Jewish songsmiths such as Irving Berlin wrote Christmas songs thinking Americans’ popular performers wanted them.

    “Karp said many Jews worked in Tin Pan Alley, the collection of songwriters and publishers that flourished in midtown Manhattan from the late 1800s to the mid-1990s, as well as in the theaters and venues where live music was performed.”

    If Torba has a problem with Jews composing Christmas songs and Christians avidly listening to them, what will he say when he learns that it was a Jewish man, Albert Sadacca, “whose Jewish family emigrated from Turkey,” and “helped develop electric Christmas lights and helped found one of the largest Christmas light manufacturers in America,” according to David Naar, associate professor of Jewish studies at the University of Washington in Seattle (https://www.bunkhistory.org/resources/perspective-christmas-lights-brought-to-you-by-a-jew-from-the-muslim-world).

    Will Torba suggest that in addition to denuding your Christmas/Holiday playlist of any songs written by Jews, you should shut down any lighting displays?

  347. says

    I’m willing to admit I may’ve overstated the dangers of a second Trump term. He’ll only be a dictator on “day one?” Shoot, that’s not so bad. We should all get twenty-four hours of tyranny, don’tcha think? On mine, we’re gonna round up everybody who holds up the line at the grocery store trying to use expired coupons.

    […] perhaps a teensy-weensy bit of despotism may spill over into the Wednesday after the inauguration, if only to give Kash Patel and JD Vance sufficient time to round up all the journalists they hope to jail.

    […] the gag order’ll be on the other foot (mouth?) should Off-Brand Orbán return to the Oval, and so his cut-rate, strip mall attorneys tirelessly pursue stall tactics designed to delay his many trials until after the election, (in fairness, proving their client’s innocence isn’t really on the table) when Attorney General Jeffrey Clark puts an end to that “rule of law” silliness once and for all.

    Well, the curtain finally fell on the community theatre adaption of Faust For Dummies that was Kevin McCarthy’s career in electoral politics. I found it surprisingly difficult to sum up his legacy for this post […] One of the very worst Americans of all time.

    Kev’s successor, Bartonite mediocrity Mike Johnson, proclaimed himself MAGA Moses, because apparently, the showrunners figured a lil’ messianic delusion might spice up the otherwise stodgy presidential line of succession. And while some may balk at Speaker Mike’s hubristic sacrilege, the truly devout can no doubt recite Exodus 69:17-23 by heart:

    So the Lord said to Moses, “When thou dost release thy security footage unto thy friendly media outlets, blur thou thy people’s faces, that they might escape accountability for assaulting police officers on behalf of thy most holy Game Show Host.”

    George Santos didn’t waste any time, did he? Little shit must’ve been setting up that Cameo account during his expulsion vote […]

    I’ll gently suggest that the after-the-buzzer extension of Republican primary debate season lends credence to the once derided theory that we live in actual Hell. Judging by the brief resurgence of social media posts about Vivek Ramaswamy’s burst-hemorrhoid-like personality, they must’ve held another one this week. Why? I could not hope to tell you.

    Viewership was way down, likely owing to the absence of Doug Burgum’s smoldering star power, or perhaps because Which of These Asshats Concedes Last? isn’t a particularly compelling question. Incidentally, you might want to check your junk folder, you may’ve been appointed chair of Ron DeSantis’ super PAC without even knowing it.

    I know this’ll sound hard to believe, but apparently, preening congressional weathervane Nancy Mace runs something of a “toxic work environment.” I find myself torn between my instinctual libtard impulse to defend labor rights, and my equally fervent belief that any obstacle to the work conducted in House Republican offices ought to be encouraged as a matter of principle. Still, rise up, comrades, and seize the means of (popcorn) production!

    Well, the U.S. military finally emerged victorious from the longest, most irritating battle of its 250-year history, as the commander of Fort Tuberville surrendered at long last, releasing his pigheaded holds on promotions, except for a handful he insists on maintaining for pure spite. Hopefully now we can get back to ignoring America’s dumbest Senator, at least until the next time he defends white nationalists, or joins a coup attempt.

    The Comeuppance Fairy visited Wisconsin and Nevada this week, bearing legal consequences and burlap underwear for the very, very naughty fake elector children who plotted the overthrow of American democracy. GOOD.

    Now, your average, run-of-the-mill, patriarchal police state would call it a day after forcing a woman to submit to the Kafkaesque nightmare of begging the courts for the brief window of bodily autonomy required to terminate a non-viable pregnancy that threatens her health and fertility, but in Ken Paxton’s Texas, they go the extra mile, threatening with prosecution any doctors or hospitals thinking about actually granting the woman her basic human rights.

    Meanwhile, the Texas GOP’s Executive Committee removed a clause reading “the Republican Party of Texas have no association whatsoever with any individual or organization that is known to espouse anti-Semitism, pro-Nazi sympathies, or Holocaust denial” from an otherwise unanimously-passed resolution, because hey, there’s no need to antagonize the base.

    […] in Florida, it’s delightful to see the Zieglers refusing to go quietly in the wake of their hyper-hypocritical sex scandal/rape investigation. [Is it] unfair to punish them while maintaining total, unquestioning fealty to a guy who’s been found legally liable for sexual assault […]?

    International crime lord Joseph Robinette Biden Jr’s weaponized Department of Justice indicted Hunter Biden on nine new tax-related charges, as part of an elaborate scheme to use the 2018 repayment of a $4,000 truck loan to make House Oversight Chairdork James Comer look like a gibbering fuckwit in 2023.

    It worked, too.

    …all while delivering yet another absolute banger of a jobs report, incidentally. BRANDONOMICS, BAY-BEE!

    Link.

  348. says

    Texas Court Gives Ken Paxton Another Shot To Force Woman To Give Birth To Dead Baby.

    Katie Cox will also likely lose her ability to have another in the process.

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/texas-court-gives-ken-paxton-another

    On Thursday, Texas Judge Maya Guerra Gamble issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) barring the state of Texas from preventing Katie Cox, a woman with severe pregnancy complications, to have an abortion. Cox’s child suffers from Trisomy 18, also known as Edwards Syndrome, a fetal anomaly that, 50 percent of the time, results in the fetus dying before or during birth, with 95 percent of those surviving past that dying painful deaths within the next two weeks. Cox also has a high likelihood of losing her ability to have another baby should she be forced to deliver this one.

    In response, Attorney General Ken Paxton sent out letters to Texas hospitals informing them that the TRO is temporary and that Texas will go after any hospital that provides Ms. Cox with the necessary abortion as soon as it is up. He also sent writ of mandamus to the state Supreme Court demanding they vacate the TRO.

    He wrote:

    The trial court entered a temporary restraining order allowing Plaintiffs to perform and procure an abortion of a single child even though Plaintiffs failed to plead and prove that they satisfy the requirements for a medical-emergency exception. By applying language not found in Texas law, the trial court’s order represents an expansion of the statutory exceptions to Texas’s abortion prohibitions. Because the life of an unborn child is at stake, this Court should require a faithful application of Texas statutes prior to determining that an abortion is permitted.

    This Court should issue an emergency stay and mandamus relief. Should the abortion occur while the TRO is in place, nothing will prevent enforcement of Texas’s civil and criminal penalties once the TRO erroneously prohibiting enforcement is vacated. But enforcement of Texas’s laws will not restore the unborn child’s life lost in the interim. That irreparable loss necessitates this Court’s immediate action. Relators therefore respectfully request that this Court issue mandamus relief.

    The child’s life is already “lost.” It has a fatal fetal anomaly. It is not going to survive and if it does survive, it will likely only live a few hours or a few days and those hours or days will very likely not be pleasant — and will be even more heartbreaking for Cox and her husband than an abortion would be. Especially if she were to lose her ability to have a child.

    Late last night, the Texas Supreme Court — a governmental body made up of judges, not doctors — did as Paxton requested.

    In other words, they determined, against the advice of Ms. Cox’s doctor, to force her to remain pregnant until the court can determine for itself whether or not she qualifies for a medical exemption, which could very well not happen until she actually gives birth.

    This is not about ensuring that an infant will get to live for a few hours outside of the womb, this is about the fact that Paxton fears that if Katie Cox is allowed her abortion, it will chip away at his gross and purposely vague anti-abortion laws. Indeed, he believes that this is the whole purpose of this suit.

    If you are wondering why Texas’ law does not include an exception for fatal fetal anomalies, it is because anti-abortion types are obsessed with forcing women to give birth to babies with no chance of survival because if they somehow did survive, it would be a miracle. They just want to give Jesus a chance to do a miracle! And they love miracles! Especially when they can then use said miracles as a cudgel against others facing similarly horrifying diagnoses who may want to have abortions. These are the people that Ken Paxton wants to make happy. Well, them and (allegedly) the occasional real estate developer.

    […] Paxton is not going to change his mind because he loves being a hero to those who oppose abortion rights more than he cares about anyone’s life. Paxton sees any exception made as a threat to the abortion laws that he wants to be his legacy and he’s not going to let Katie Cox or any other woman about to give birth to a dead baby and lose her ability to have another one stand in the way of that.

    UPDATE: Turns out that one of the judges who issued the ruling has previously been arrested 37 times for protesting abortion clinics and bragged in his campaign ad about his wife surviving a labor that was supposed to kill her just to watch their baby die an hour after it was born, but he swears that this does not mean he can’t issue an unbiased reading in this matter. Texas!

  349. Reginald Selkirk says

    Rural mail carriers warned not to blame mail delays on Amazon

    Mail carriers in a rural Minnesota post office overwhelmed by Amazon packages say they’ve been warned not to use the word “Amazon,” including when customers ask why the mail is delayed.

    “We are not to mention the word ‘Amazon’ to anyone,” said a mail carrier who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect their job. ..

    In addition to being banned from saying “Amazon,” postal workers have also been told their jobs could be at risk if they speak publicly about post office issues. Staffers were told they could attend Tuesday’s meeting only on their 30-minute lunch break if they changed out of uniform, mail carriers said. One mail carrier said he’d been warned there could be “consequences” for those who showed up…

    The beatings will continue until morale improves

  350. Reginald Selkirk says

    Casey and Ron DeSantis play cleanup over Iowa caucus remarks

    Casey and Ron DeSantis are seeking to clarify comments the Florida first lady made on Friday that appeared to encourage out-of-state voters to participate in the Iowa caucuses.

    “We’re asking all of these moms and grandmoms to come from wherever it might be, North Carolina, South Carolina and to descend upon the state of Iowa to be a part of the caucus, because you do not have to be a resident of Iowa to be able to participate in the caucus. So, moms and grandmas are going to be able to come and be a part and let their voice be heard in support of Ron DeSantis,” Casey said, in a side-by-side interview on Fox News with her husband ahead of a “Mamas for DeSantis” event in West Des Moines.

    After the Fox News appearance, Casey DeSantis clarified on X that by participating in the Iowa caucuses, she didn’t mean voting.

    “While voting in the Iowa caucus is limited to registered voters in Iowa…

    Generally AI prefer to take it easy on the families of candidates. But if they insert themselves into the politics, they are making themselves fair game.

  351. says

    The Old New Way to Provide Cheap Housing

    New York Times link

    Homelessness is an American tragedy, but it’s not hopeless.[…] Houston has become a national model by reducing homelessness by more than 60 percent.

    […] homelessness, above all, reflects a shortage of cheap housing. So I’m intrigued by an approach to providing such housing that’s gaining ground around the country. It’s an idea so old, it seems new: converting single-family houses to rooming houses.

    Rooming houses, boardinghouses or single room occupancy (S.R.O.) hotels used to be ubiquitous. President Thomas Jefferson stayed in a boardinghouse for several months before moving into the White House. At the seedier end, S.R.O.s largely disappeared over the past half-century, partly because of zoning and economic development projects.

    In Houston I dropped in on a home operated by PadSplit, a company that offers furnished bedrooms for working-class Americans. PadSplit, which is something like a long-term Airbnb for rooming houses, has housed 22,000 people so far and is growing fast.

    The PadSplit model is to take a house that is near public transportation, […] put locks on each bedroom door and then rent out each room by the week. This typically means a shared bathroom and kitchen, and some tenants have complaints, but it’s affordable for people who have few other options.

    “It’s reasonable!” said Gregory Walker, 46, a warehouse employee who takes home $2,300 a month.

    He pays $150 a week, or a bit more than $600 a month, for a furnished bedroom in the PadSplit I visited. He shares it with six others in a middle-class neighborhood. Utilities and Wi-Fi are included in the rent.

    Previously, Walker was stuck in a “sleazy hotel,” as he put it, for $1,950 a month because he had a poor credit record that made it difficult to rent an apartment.

    Rooming houses are quite different from the practice of young professionals having housemates in cities like New York and Boston. PadSplit rooms are often cheaper […], management is by a company rather than the residents, and payment is by the week to make it more workable for people living paycheck by paycheck. S.R.O.s were often squalid, but PadSplit is trying to elevate the experience.

    PadSplit is the brainchild of an Atlanta real estate developer, Atticus LeBlanc, the company’s chief executive. He studied architecture and urban studies at Yale but knew little of rooming houses. Then in 2009 he was renting out a home, and two men asked if they could rent individual rooms in it.

    The men had only Social Security for income — $685 per month for one man and $735 for the other — and had been paying $100 a week for rooms in a decrepit house with no heating or air conditioning, but that home had been foreclosed on, and they needed to find somewhere else to live.

    LeBlanc realized that if he rented rooms out at $100 a week, he could give people with low incomes comfortable accommodations and increase his income from the house.

    “This was mind-blowing,” LeBlanc told me.

    He entered a competition for ideas to provide affordable housing and won foundation funding that allowed him to start PadSplit in 2017. It’s a public benefit corporation, meaning that it is for profit but also aims to advance a social purpose.

    Now operating in 18 cities, PadSplit provides an online platform for low-income workers to find furnished rooms offered by landlords. Sometimes the landlords rent out the entire house, room by room; others rent out just a room or two. PadSplit renters have an average age of 35 and earn a median of $30,000 per year.

    […] PadSplit hasn’t received direct public subsidies, and the model has room to scale up; census data suggests that there are tens of millions of bedrooms in America that no one sleeps in. This can provide low-cost housing more quickly and cheaply than public efforts to build housing: San Francisco has built some housing units for people who are homeless for more than $1 million each.

    There’s no one answer to America’s housing crisis, but I’d like to see local governments experiment by rewarding landlords for creating basement flats, taking in boarders or creating rooming houses. A major impediment is local zoning regulations, which sometimes limit how many unrelated people can live together in a house.

    I’m sure some readers will see this model as exploitative and think that people should have the right to their own home. Yes, that would be nice, but that sentiment doesn’t actually get anyone housed. And while sharing a bathroom and kitchen isn’t ideal, it’s so much better than living in a car.

    Millions of Americans working as teachers, firefighters or factory workers simply can’t afford to rent apartments, or credit problems mean they can’t get approved to rent. PadSplit takes people with eviction histories or weak credit but still makes it work with modern real estate management practices: It claims a 97.5 percent collection rate.

    All this is a reminder that we used to have solutions to homelessness — like S.R.O.s — that we mostly eliminated half a century ago. This was a catastrophe of good intentions: We aimed to improve housing and neighborhoods and instead we got people sleeping in cars and on sidewalks.

  352. Reginald Selkirk says

    France’s Emmanuel Macron buffeted from all sides in row over secularism

    Emmanuel Macron has been accused of betraying the French Republic after he took part in a Jewish ceremony inside his official residence, the Elysée Palace.

    In a country where the separation of religion is itself a religion, the lighting of a Hanukkah candle inside the historic Salle des Fêtes on Thursday was immediately denounced by politicians of both right and left…

  353. Reginald Selkirk says

    A paradise island vacation with no mosquito bites – and no chemicals

    Soneva Fushi, a resort on the private Kunfunadhoo Island in the Maldives, has spent years working to eradicate these pests.

    The most effective solution they’ve found has led to a dramatic reduction of mosquitoes, and invigorated the island’s tropical plants and animals in the process.

    Soneva has partnered with the Germany-based company Biogents, which has developed mosquito traps that rely on environmentally friendly attractants.

    “We had been looking at ways to manage mosquitoes without the use of chemicals,” said Arnfinn Oines, Soneva’s director of social and environmental consciousness…

    because environmentally friendly attractants aren’t ‘chemicals’. (roll-eyes)

    Soneva first employed the Biogents system in 2019, using two different types of traps – more than 500 in total positioned around the island. The first type, called the BG-GAT, is a passive trap meant for tiger mosquitoes that have already bitten someone and are searching for a place to lay eggs, according to Oines.

    The second type, the BG-Mosquitaire CO2, is meant to attract mosquitoes searching for blood, which it does by using carbon dioxide created through yeast and sugar fermentation, plus lactic acid, which mimics human skin…

    Beyond just using the traps, the resort has educated staffers on mosquito ecology. Now, the Soneva team does inspections of the property to identify and reduce things like tarps, fallen coconut shells and anything else that could hold stagnant water, which is necessary for the bugs to breed…

    The resort said it recorded a dramatic decrease in the island’s mosquito population by upwards of 98% in the first year…

    The resort chain has gifted mosquito traps to Parliament in Malé, the country’s capital, and trained staffers on how to use them.

    It has also implemented the Biogents system on Soneva Jani, the brand’s resort on the island of Medhufaru in the nearby Noonu Atoll, with similar results. And they’ve installed traps at its new resort development Soneva Secret, slated to open early in 2024, and have recorded zero mosquitoes over several months…

  354. StevoR says

    Today – 10th December so tomorrow for those in the USA & most of the three American continents* – is Human Rights Day :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Day

    https://www.un.org/en/observances/human-rights-day

    Human Rights Day 2023 official youtube clip — 3 mins 25 seconds here

    For Whatever it’s Worth.

    .* Or areas – is Central (Latin) America a continent of its own or an isthumus / intersectionof two other continents? Hmm.. unsure. “The New World”at least in ancient European parlance.

  355. Reginald Selkirk says

    Pliosaur discovery: Huge sea monster emerges from Dorset cliffs

    The skull of a colossal sea monster has been extracted from the cliffs of Dorset’s Jurassic Coast.

    It belongs to a pliosaur, a ferocious marine reptile that terrorised the oceans about 150 million years ago.

    The 2m-long fossil is one of the most complete specimens of its type ever discovered and is giving new insights into this ancient predator…

  356. KG says

    Will Torba suggest that in addition to denuding your Christmas/Holiday playlist of any songs written by Jews, you should shut down any lighting displays? Lynna, OM quoting DK @465

    And of course any mention of the Jew whose birth it (supposedly) celebrates.

  357. Reginald Selkirk says

    Republican Presidential Candidates Debate Anonymity on Social Media

    Four Republican candidates for U.S. president debated Wednesday — and moderator Megyn Kelly had a tough question for former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley. “Can you please speak to the requirement that you said that every anonymous internet user needs to out themselves?”

    Nikki Haley: What I said was, that social media companies need to show us their algorithms. I also said there are millions of bots on social media right now. They’re foreign, they’re Chinese, they’re Iranian. I will always fight for freedom of speech for Americans; we do not need freedom of speech for Russians and Iranians and Hamas. We need social media companies to go and fight back on all of these bots that are happening. That’s what I said…

    This is an ignorant response.

    “Freedom of Speech”, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. constitution, applies to all people, not just American citizens.
    Haley’s response inadvertently highlights the distinction between freedom of speech and platforming/deplatforming.

  358. says

    Reginald @484, utterly amazing.

    […]There are gasps as the sheet covering the fossil is pulled back and the skull is revealed for the first time.

    It’s immediately obvious that this pliosaur is huge and beautifully preserved.

    There isn’t a specimen anywhere else to match it, believes local palaeontologist Steve Etches.

    I liked the closeups of the jaw and teeth that were included in the article. It was also impressive to see the workers, suspended by ropes, working at the cliff face.

  359. tomh says

    NYT:
    Talk of a Trump Dictatorship Charges the American Political Debate
    Peter Baker / Dec. 9, 2023

    When a historian wrote an essay the other day warning that the election of former President Donald J. Trump next year could lead to dictatorship, one of Mr. Trump’s allies quickly responded by calling for the historian to be sent to prison.

    It almost sounds like a parody: The response to concerns about dictatorship is to prosecute the author. But Mr. Trump and his allies are not going out of their way to reassure those worried about what a new term would bring by firmly rejecting the dictatorship charge. If anything, they seem to be leaning into it.

    If Mr. Trump is returned to office, people close to him have vowed to “come after” the news media, open criminal investigations into onetime aides who broke with the former president and purge the government of civil servants deemed disloyal. When critics said Mr. Trump’s language about ridding Washington of “vermin” echoed that of Adolf Hitler, the former president’s spokesman said the critics’ “sad, miserable existence will be crushed” under a new Trump administration.

    Mr. Trump himself did little to assuage Americans when his friend Sean Hannity tried to help him out on Fox News this past week. During a town hall-style meeting, Mr. Hannity tossed a seeming softball by asking Mr. Trump to reaffirm that of course he did not intend to abuse his power and use the government to punish enemies. Instead of simply agreeing, Mr. Trump said he would only be a dictator on “Day 1” of a new term.

    “Trump has made it crystal clear through all his actions and rhetoric that he admires leaders who have forms of authoritarian power, from Putin to Orban to Xi, and that he wants to exercise that kind of power at home,” said Ruth Ben-Ghiat, author of “Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present,” referring to Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, Viktor Orban of Hungary and Xi Jinping of China. “History shows that autocrats always tell you who they are and what they are going to do,” she added. “We just don’t listen until it is too late.”….

    Mr. Trump once expressed no regret that a quote he shared on social media came from Mussolini and adopted the language of Stalin in calling journalists the “enemies of the people.” He told his chief of staff that “Hitler did a lot of good things” and later said he wished American generals were like Hitler’s generals.

    Last December, shortly after opening his comeback campaign, Mr. Trump called for “termination” of the Constitution to remove Mr. Biden immediately and reinstall himself in the White House without waiting for another election.

    The former president’s defenders dismiss the fears about Mr. Trump’s autocratic instincts as whining by liberals who do not like him or his policies and are disingenuously trying to scare voters. They argue that President Biden is the real dictator because his Justice Department is prosecuting his likeliest challenger next year for various alleged crimes….

    Mr. Kagan, a widely respected Brookings Institution scholar and author of numerous books of history, has a long record of support for a muscular foreign policy that hardly strikes many on the left as liberal. But he has been a strong and outspoken critic of Mr. Trump for years. In May 2016, when other Republicans were reconciling themselves to Mr. Trump’s first nomination for president, Mr. Kagan warned that “this is how fascism comes to America.”

    His essay on Nov. 30 sounded the alarm again. Mr. Trump may have been thwarted in his first term from enacting some of his more radical ideas by more conventional Republican advisers and military officers, Mr. Kagan argued, but he will not surround himself with such figures again and will encounter fewer of the checks and balances that constrained him last time.

    … he noted Mr. Trump’s overt discussion of prosecuting opponents and sending the military into the streets to quell protests. “In just a few years, we have gone from being relatively secure in our democracy to being a few short steps, and a matter of months, away from the possibility of dictatorship,” Mr. Kagan wrote.

    Senator J.D. Vance, a freshman senator who has courted Mr. Trump’s support and was listed by Axios this past week as a possible vice-presidential running mate next year, took umbrage on behalf of the former president. He dispatched a letter to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland suggesting that Mr. Kagan be prosecuted for encouraging “open rebellion,” seizing on a point in Mr. Kagan’s essay noting that Democratic-run states might defy a President Trump…

    Mr. Kagan’s piece did not actually advocate rebellion, but simply forecast the possibility that Democratic governors would stand against Mr. Trump “through a form of nullification” of federal authority. Indeed, he went on to suggest that Republican governors might do the same with Mr. Biden, which he was not advocating either.

    But Mr. Vance was trying to draw a parallel between Mr. Kagan’s essay and Mr. Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. By the Justice Department’s logic in pursuing Mr. Trump, the senator wrote, the Kagan article could be interpreted as “an invitation to ‘insurrection,’ a manifestation of criminal ‘conspiracy,’ or an attempt to bring about civil war.” To make his point clear, he insisted on answers by Jan. 6.

    Mr. Kagan, who followed his essay with “another on Thursday” about how to stop the slide to dictatorship that he sees, said the intervention by the senator validated his point. “It is revealing that their first instinct when attacked by a journalist is to suggest that they be locked up,” Mr. Kagan noted in an interview.

    …no one expects Mr. Garland to take Mr. Vance seriously, including almost certainly Mr. Vance. His letter was a political statement. But it says something about the era that proposing the prosecution of a critic would be seen as a political winner.

  360. says

    Missouri lawmakers propose allowing homicide charges for women who have abortions

    Some Missouri lawmakers are renewing a call for the state to take an anti-abortion step that goes further than prominent anti-abortion groups want to go and that has not gained much traction in any state so far: a law that would allow homicide charges against women who obtain abortions.

    Republicans in both the state House and Senate have introduced bills to be considered in the legislative session that begins next month to apply homicide laws on behalf of a victim who is an “unborn child at every stage of development.”

    The bills would offer exceptions if the suspect is a woman who aborts a pregnancy after being coerced or threatened, or an abortion is provided by a physician to save the life of the pregnant woman.

    “To me, it’s just about protecting a baby’s life like we do every other person’s life,” state Rep. Bob Titus, a first-term Republican who is sponsoring one of the measures, told The Associated Press. “The prosecution is just a consequence of taking an innocent human life.”

    […] Abortion-related measures could be before voters in several states next year. Since last year, voters have sided with abortion rights in all seven states where the questions have been on the ballot.

    […] Most Republican-controlled states have adopted bans or restrictions and most Democrat-run states have taken steps to protect access.

    […] In South Carolina, more than 20 GOP lawmakers signed on as sponsors of a bill that would have classified abortion as homicide. As the bill garnered attention, several lawmakers withdrew their support. […]

  361. says

    “In this kind of a fight, the center of gravity is the civilian population. And if you drive them into the arms of the enemy, you replace a tactical victory with a strategic defeat.”

    Quoting Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin

    Melanie Swan of the Telegraph reports about the steadfast support given by Jewish Rabbis to West Bank Palestinian Olive farmers in the face of violent Israeli settler attacks that have increased during the current conflict. In the past, an 80 year old Rabbi was struck with an iron crowbar wielded by rabid settlers trying to take over the Palestinian olive farm. Despite the risks, the Rabbis have continued to shield the Palestinians on the farms from harm. This story restores one’s faith in humanity and tells us that it is the rulers that are instigating communal violence and that the solution to the problem can be found among the common people who are adversely affected.

    Link

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/10/rabbis-for-human-rights-protect-west-bank-olive-harvest/

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/rabbis-form-human-shield-protect-101103370.html

  362. says

    “We really need help. Simply put, we can’t get tired of this situation, because if we do, we’ll die. And if the world gets tired, they’ll just let us die,” – Olena Zelenska.

    […] Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu continues to falsely characterize Russian offensive efforts in Ukraine as part of an “active defense” in an effort to temper expectations about the Russian military’s ability to achieve operationally significant objectives.

    […] Russian occupation officials continue to set conditions for the deportation of Ukrainians to Russia under various vacation schemes.

    Link

  363. says

    Trump doubles down on ‘dictator’ remarks at New York Republican gala

    Former President Trump on Saturday appeared to double down on remarks he made about whether he would abuse power or serve as a “dictator” if he was reelected to the White House, reiterating that he only wants to be a “dictator for one day” in order to secure the southern border and embark on drilling in the U.S.

    “[Peter] Baker today in the New York Times said that I want to be a dictator,” Trump said on Saturday while delivering a keynote speech to the New York Young Republican Club’s 111th Annual Gala. “I didn’t say that. I said I want to be a dictator for one day. You know why I wanted to be a dictator? Because I want a wall, and I want to drill, drill, drill.”

    […] Saturday night’s Gala featured other headlining Republican voices, including Rep. Matt Getz (Fla.) and Sen. Roger Marshall (Kan.), both of whom have endorsed Trump’s 2024 reelection bid.

    “Less than a year from now, American has a choice to make — greatness or decline. I look around this city and I see the fingerprints of President Trump everywhere,” Gaetz said in a fiery speech on Saturday, adding later, “And how has New York rewarded this great man? By trying to bankrupt him and imprison him,” in reference to Trump’s ongoing civil trial in which control of his business empire is at stake.

  364. says

    NY fraud trial update:

    […] With a smile on her face, New York Attorney General Letitia James recapped the testimonies of three expert witnesses called for Trump’s defense and explained how each one actually helped prove her case that Trump and his company committed fraud.

    James’s case specifically alleges that Trump and his company knowingly falsified financial statements, inflating and deflating the values of assets to get better insurance and loan terms.

    “Over the past few days, we continue to hear testimony from the defendants’ many expert witnesses,” she said. “And one of these experts admitted that the valuations of some of the properties on Donald Trump’s statement of financial condition were neither ‘proper,’ nor ‘reasonable.’”

    Another witness, James said, was asked by Trump personally to help his case at his Mar-a-Lago club, a conflict of interest. A third had their fees paid by Trump’s political action committee.

    “He testified that the value of Donald Trump’s triplex was inflated. That we can agree,” she said of the third witness. “But he also had a lot to say about Donald Trump’s statements of financial condition, even though he has not prepared a financial statement since the 1980s.” […]

    Link

  365. says

    […] The US did do at least one not-bitterly-ironic thing this Human Rights Day — we put an end to family separation at the border, for at least another eight years. Go team! Or, you know, one judge in San Diego!

    U.S. District Court Judge Dana Sabraw — a George W. Bush appointee, no less — approved a court settlement on Friday prohibiting federal U.S. border officials from separating families at the border for the next eight years. This would, in many cases, be in line with Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states “everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

    The settlement was the result of a 2018 lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union against the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance policy” which led to the separation of over 5,000 children from their parents. While the settlement does not include monetary compensation, which the Biden administration had considered, victims of this policy will be eligible for certain kinds of aid.

    The Washington Post reports that those victimized by this policy “may apply for three-year work permits, six months of housing assistance and one year of medical care, according to the settlement. The families also are eligible for three years of counseling under the settlement.”

    Additionally, those who were deported will have their records cleared and will be allowed to apply for asylum.

    This is all very, very good. Not being horrible to people or separating children from their families, in general, is good. (It would also be super great if we could get more housing assistance, medical care and counseling to everyone in the United States.) […]

    https://www.wonkette.com/p/nice-judge-bans-family-separation

  366. says

    The majority of online posts stoking up anti-immigrant and far-right sentiment in Ireland come from the US and UK rather than Irish users, according to analysis of social media traffic. […]

    The popularity of the “Irish lives matter” hashtag in the US is likely mainly down to a post from an account on X called “Catturd” on November 29th which instructed its 2.1 million followers to make the phrase “trend”. The Catturd account, which is run by Phillip Buchanan, a right-wing online personality from Florida, has posts regularly amplified by X’s owner Elon Musk.

    Irish far-right internet personality Keith O’Brien, who goes by the name Keith Woods and is another regular contact of Mr Musk, also played a major role in boosting the hashtag among his large US audience.

    In Ireland, an investigation by the Garda National Bureau of Criminal Investigation is ongoing into a number of Irish far-right activists to determine if they played a role in inciting the violence on November 23rd.

    Link

  367. says

    In a reversal, Donald Trump says he will not testify in his own defense in New York fraud trial

    Trump was scheduled to take the stand Monday as the months-long $250 million civil fraud trial against him and his company enters its final week.

    In an 11th hour reversal, former President Donald Trump announced Sunday he will not go back on the witness stand in the $250 million civil fraud trial against him and his company.

    “I have already testified to everything & have nothing more to say other than this is a complete & total election interference (Biden campaign!) witch hunt” so “I will not be testifying on Monday,” Trump said in an all caps, two part post on his social media platform Truth Social.

    […] Trump was under no obligation to testify since it’s his own defense case. His son Eric similarly backed out of testifying this past Wednesday, which Trump said in a social media post on Tuesday night he’d directed him to do. Like his father, Eric Trump had testified as a witness in the AG’s case. “Eric has already testified, PERFECTLY,” Trump wrote, “so there is no reason to waste any more of this Crooked Court’s time on having him say the same thing, over and over again, as a witness for the defense.”

    Trump’s attorney Alina Habba told reporters after the former president appeared as a spectator at the trial on Thursday that he was “looking forward to taking the stand.”

    She said she had urged him not to testify again because of a gag order preventing him from criticizing the judge’s law clerk, who he had previously complained is biased against him. She said Trump was undeterred because “he is so firmly against what is happening in this court.”

    “He will open himself up to whatever they want because he’s not afraid. People that are afraid cower. President Trump doesn’t cower,” she said. [oh please, what bullshit]

    […] The AG’s office is expected to have two rebuttal witnesses testify for their case […] After that, both sides will be able to submit filings to the judge explaining why they believe they’ve proven their case, and will then return to court for closing arguments on Jan. 11.

    Engoron has said he expects it will take him a few weeks to issue his ruling in the case.

    At least this is one case that will be over and done with soon.

  368. says

    Hunger, thirst and chaos in southern Gaza as hostilities drive humanitarian aid to the brink of collapse

    Aid agencies describe “apocalyptic” scenes as families roam the streets unable to find food, people ration dirty water, and flour prices soar.

    Twelve-year-old Do’a Atef spends her days knocking on doors begging for food, or gathering firewood from a dusty hill near a refugee camp outside Rafah, in southern Gaza, to cook the few tomatoes and peppers given to her by strangers.

    Do’a told NBC News that she was displaced from her home in Beit Lahia in northern Gaza, along with her parents and seven siblings, and they are now sleeping in tents. They are so thirsty, “we drink dirty water,” she said. “My siblings are crying all day.”

    They couldn’t find flour, they were cold, there was no bathroom for them to use, no diapers for her baby brother, and no milk to give him. Two months ago, Do’a said, she used to read in school and play with her friends. “Now, all we do is bring firewood and walk barefoot.”

    Do’a’s situation underscores a bleak reality for many in Gaza, as the Israeli military’s ground invasion and aerial bombardment continues, displacing an estimated 1.9 million Palestinians into shrinking “humanitarian zones,” mostly in southern Gaza. A dire food and water shortage is putting many at risk of infection and death, according to humanitarian aid groups that stressed difficulties in delivering aid due to the intensity of hostilities.

    […] “The scarcity of aid has led to desperate struggles over water tearing at our social fabric,” Bushra Khalidi, policy lead for Oxfam, said. “The situation in Gaza is not just a catastrophe, it’s apocalyptic.”

    Aid agencies described children and families roaming the streets, unable to find food and with nowhere to go. Lines for clean water can last hours, and some have turned to collecting rainwater, which in this semi-arid land is scarce, too. Supermarket shelves are empty. People arrive at bakeries before dawn, with no guarantee they’ll end up with a sack of bread before the shop runs out.

    […] The price for a 25-kilogram (55-pound) sack of flour has skyrocketed to as high as $100 — up from about $15 before the war.

    […] “Those who survived the bombardment now face imminent risk of dying of starvation and disease,” Alexandra Saieh of Save the Children said during a press briefing on Thursday.

    “The lack of water and hygiene is aggravating the diseases: diarrhea, vomiting, skin allergy, lice in the children’s hair,” said Chiara Saccardi, regional head of Action Against Hunger.

    […] While humanitarian aid has since entered the strip, it’s a fraction of what is needed.

    Approximately 500 trucks entered Gaza daily before the hostilities, and during the seven-day truce, that number was approximately 300. Since the collapse of the cease-fire, aid distribution has dropped again. […]

  369. says

    Biden invites Ukrainian President Zelenskyy to the White House on Tuesday

    The White House is intensifying its efforts to strike a deal on foreign aid for Ukraine and Israel.

    President Joe Biden has invited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the White House for a meeting on Tuesday, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement Sunday.

    Biden intends to “underscore the United States’ unshakeable commitment to supporting the people of Ukraine” in its war against Russia during the meeting, Jean-Pierre said.

    “As Russia ramps up its missile and drone strikes against Ukraine, the leaders will discuss Ukraine’s urgent needs and the vital importance of the United States’ continued support at this critical moment,” she added.

    This is a developing story. I’ll look for updates later.

  370. birgerjohansson says

    Hashtag saving millions of lives-

    Today, the Nobel Prizes were delivered to the recipients – the Peace Prize in Oslo, the others in Stockholm.

    I am not fond of the kind of pomp and circumstance that is common in Britain, Merica and – occasionally- Sweden.
    But if there is some occasion when it is justified, it is when giving the Nobel Prize to the person who invented the mRNA technuques that made it possible to rapidly create mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 and save millions of lives.

    As most are probably aware by now, she was treated badly at the first US university where she worked, as the bosses did not see the value of her work.
    This is one hell of a revenge!

    BTW the Norwegian prize ceremonies usually have excellent international music performers – I hope it will be available on Youtube or elsewhere on social media.
    One of the songs was one political prisoners used to sing in the Iranian prisons, about opening the cage and letting the bird out.
    The family of the imprisone6d Iranian human rights activist received the prize in her place.