Discuss: Political Madness All the Time


Wouldn’t you know it, this thread would lapse just before Trump was kicked out of office. I wonder if the new thread will be as lively without the Orange Cheeto around to focus our anger? I think Joe might provide some prompting, at least.

Lynna is your curator. Type furiously!

(Previous thread)

Comments

  1. says

    […] “The garden is going strong!” said Dr. Jill Biden to People in a new interview the magazine did with her, the first lady, and her husband Joe Biden, the president.

    Michelle Obama confirms: [Photo available at the link]

    YAY. Happy news!

    The past few weeks have been kind of a mindfuck, as we watch normalcy attempt to return. There are these White House press briefings! Every day! The press secretary is pretty cool […] President Biden got on the phone with Vladimir Putin recently, not his first world leader call but like his ninth, and he actually laid down the law about a hundred things. He didn’t even make out with Putin through the phone receiver! President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris went to the State Department today, where Biden delivered his first major foreign policy address, about strengthening the alliances Donald Trump squandered, staying tough on Putin, supporting LGBTQ people around the world, and much, much more.

    In short, America is still here, a republic if we can keep it […]

    And we once again have a president who squeezes time into his busy day to sit down with his wife, whom he loves, and gab with People about whatever. “How long is this going to take?” he asked the interviewer. “I need to get back to the Oval.” Oh yeah, that’s another weird thing. Biden, like, goes to work every day.

    The People interview is fun, though. Did you know Dr. Biden, even as first lady, is continuing to teach English at Northern Virginia Community College? She did it as second lady, and she’s just gotten back to it as first lady. Bet those students do their homework. […] (Her students call her “Dr. B.”)

    In the interview, the Bidens talked about what it’s like to live in the White House for the first time, Biden’s reflections on the inauguration, and also shared the secret to their happy marriage:

    President Biden: She has a backbone like a ramrod. Everybody says marriage is 50/50. Well, sometimes you have to be 70/30. Thank God that when I’m really down, she steps in, and when she’s really down, I’m able to step in. We’ve been really supportive of one another. I’ve read all that data as well about families under pressure, and that’s why I’m glad she kept her profession. It’s really important that she’s an educator, although she took off two years when we first got married because the boys were little. It’s important that she has the things that she cares a great deal about, her independence. And yet we share each other’s dreams.

    Dr. Biden: All that we’ve been through together — the highs, the lows and certainly tragedy and loss — there’s that quote that says sometimes you become stronger in the fractured places. That’s what we try to achieve.

    President Biden added that he thinks they could technically do their jobs without each other — they’re not codependent morons — but “not as well as we do them” together. Dr. Biden added that they don’t fight much because “after 43 years of marriage there’s really not that much more to fight about.”

    President Biden said Dr. Biden leaves him important thoughts and messages on the bathroom mirror to make sure he sees them while he’s shaving, awwwwww that’s nice.

    People asked President Biden about the new ethics rules he signed, and whether he’d be “putting up guardrails” to “avoid any appearance of wrongdoing.” And he said this weird thing, we are still processing it:

    President Biden: No one in our family and extended family is going to be involved in any government undertaking or foreign policy. And nobody has an office in this place.

    HUH. No office for Hunter Biden? He’s not even going to be in charge of Middle East policy? […]

    Anyway, nice People magazine interview with the president and first lady, because nice things exist again. […]

    Wonkette link

  2. blf says

    This is not The Onion, In the Wake of the MAGA Insurrection, Jim Bakker Now Insists That Christians Don’t Riot:

    […] End Times pastor Jim Bakker and his guest, End Times author Jonathan Cahn, insisted that Christians had nothing to do with the Jan 6 insurrection […]

    Bakker and Cahn insisted that even though Christians played no role in the chaos at the Capitol, left-wing activists are nonetheless trying to use the event to justify shutting down churches and persecuting believers.

    I still don’t understand all of that, Bakker said. Christians don’t burn buildings down. Christians don’t riot. They just don’t. I’m talking about born-again Christians, biblical Christians.

    That is an interesting statement coming from Bakker, considering that just three months before the election, Bakker himself warned that if Trump lost the election, Christians would start a revolution.

    We’ve got a few more days to stand up, Bakker said in August 2020. It’s going to be too late after the election, I believe. I think if we elect the wrong people — and you see how wrong it’s been — we’re gonna have a revolution. The church people are going to march in the streets.

    […]

    If they go through with that [impeach hair furor the first time], there will be a riot in the United States of America, and you’re going to find little old ladies rioting, you’re going to find the church people out rioting because they’re not going to take it any more, Bakker said in November 2017.

    [… additional examples…]

    For years, Bakker had warned that Christians would rise up, riot, and start a revolution if Trump was removed from office. When Trump was removed from office, a group of his supporters did exactly that, and now Bakker insists that Christians had nothing to do with it.

  3. blf says

    The Onion, Republicans Accuse Ocasio-Cortez Of Not Being Anywhere Near Place They Told Capitol Mob She Would Be:

    Pointing out the inconsistency in her personal account of the Jan. 6 insurrection, republicans accused New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Thursday of not being anywhere near the place they told the Capitol mob she would be. “She was supposed to be in a room just off the Capitol rotunda, which is where we told the angry white nationalists she’d be hiding, but she wasn’t even there,” said South Carolina Rep Nancy Mace, one of the many republicans condemning Ocasio-Cortez for hiding in a completely different building during the insurrection instead of where her colleagues told the violent rioters they should expect to find her. [see SC@467(previous page) …] At press time, republicans were calling upon Ocasio-Cortez to deliver a full apology and vow to always be open about her exact whereabouts at all times to avoid misleading her potential killers in the future.

  4. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Rachel Maddow is reporting that the Hair Furor is using the Presidential Seal on his letterhead, and always refers to himself in correspondence and has himself referred as the 45th President, and by his lawyers, not the Former President. Cue the theme from the Twilight Zone.

  5. Tethys says

    Frankly, the last thing I ever expected to become is a rabble rousing, leftist, little old lady.

    We did not have a riot to protest installing the orange buffoon. We had the biggest bipartisan protest in history. Then we hunkered down and got to work getting better people elected to congress.

    I note a distinct lack of little old ladies in the footage of storming congress. I see mainly middle aged and younger white dudes, with some white women of the same age group, and a couple people of color.

  6. blf says

    Two or three years ago, I learned the Kirin brewing company (Japan) had done a deal with teh wannabe-generlisimos in Myanmar. This was triply-distressing, a profit-making partnership business with a military, and with a known corrupt coup-prone force, and because Kirin beer is rather good (in my opinion). Since then, I’ve refused to buy it and complained about the connection (as have others). Some good news, Kirin beer company cuts brewery ties with Myanmar military over coup:

    […]
    Japanese drinks giant Kirin Holdings will abandon its partnership with a Myanmar brewery part-owned by military generals who overthrew the elected government this week and are under international sanctions for genocide.

    The brewer […] has been urged for years to cut ties with its Myanmar business operations, with human rights groups alleging its continued part-ownership of two military-linked breweries made it in effect complicit in war crimes committed by the military.

    […]

    “Given the current circumstances, we have no option but to terminate our current joint-venture partnership with Myanma Economic Holdings … as a matter of urgency,” Kirin said in a statement.

    […]

    Walking away from the breweries will be difficult for Kirin, as it will hand valuable assets to the military figures it has already been criticised for doing business with.

    A spokesperson for advocacy group Justice for Myanmar, Yadanar Maung, said Kirin had “listened to the voices of the Myanmar people” and made the right decision.

    […]

    Yadanar Maung said all companies that remained in business with the military regime should immediately sever links.

    Business partnerships with multinationals provides not only much-needed foreign currency for the isolated Myanmar military — which is subject to global arms embargoes — but also, crucially, is a source of international legitimacy.

    “The business interests of top generals is a motivation for the coup so business has a crucial role to play now by cutting ties,” said Yadanar Maung.

    Amnesty International Australia campaigner Tim O’Connor welcomed Kirin’s decision.

    “It’s only a shame it took a military coup d’etat for them to finally move on what was always a venture that delivered huge sums of money to Myanmar military and their leaders who are accused of the gravest human rights violations.

    “The dividends that MEHL [Myanma Economic Holdings Public Company Limited, teh wannabe-generlisimos for-profit company (one of several, I believe)] received through joint ventures with Kirin likely helped finance these atrocities.”

    […]

    A UN fact-finding mission report in 2018 said “any engagement in any form” with the Myanmar military was “indefensible”. [I suspect that’s when I became aware of the link. –blf]

    My beer supply is almost exhausted, when I replenish I can include some Kirin. (I currently have no reason to doubt their statement.) Yeah! (burp !)

  7. blf says

    I’ve not been following this story, but Al Jazeera has been running a series on corruption in Bangladesh. The UN has noticed, and is not happy with the reported corruption, UN calls for Bangladesh army probe after Al Jazeera investigation:

    Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit revealed Bangladesh bought Israeli-made surveillance technology used to monitor cell phones.

    The United Nations is calling for a full investigation into evidence of corruption and illegality involving the Bangladesh army […].

    The corruption involves Bangladesh’s Chief of Army Staff, General Aziz Ahmed, who is due to meet senior UN officials in New York next week [and is currently in the States –blf].

    In All the Prime Minister’s Men, Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit revealed that Bangladesh’s military purchased sophisticated and highly intrusive mobile phone surveillance equipment from Israel, which Bangladesh military commanders claimed was for one of the Army Contingents due to be deployed in the UN Peacekeeping Mission.

    A spokesperson for the UN said that this was not the case and that its peacekeepers do not operate “electronic equipment of the nature described in the Al Jazeera reporting”.

    “Such equipment has not been deployed with Bangladeshi contingents in United Nations peacekeeping operations,” the UN spokesperson told Al Jazeera.

    […]

    Bangladesh is the largest overall contributor of uniformed personnel to UN Peacekeeping missions, with more than 6,800 presently deployed in peacekeeping operations around the world.

    The surveillance equipment is called an “international mobile subscriber identity-catcher”, or IMSI-catcher. It is a tool that emulates cell towers to trick cellular devices into providing locations and data that is then captured by the device.

    It can be used to track hundreds of attendees of demonstrations simultaneously, among other things.

    The Bangladesh army said that the equipment was made in Hungary and not Israel, which the Muslim-majority country does not recognise.

    Al Jazeera obtained the contract for the purchase, which deliberately concealed the fact that the manufacturer, PicSix, is an Israeli company. PicSix was set up by former Israeli intelligence agents and sent two experts to Hungary to train officers from the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI), Bangladesh’ military intelligence service, on how to operate the equipment.

    The contract, dated June 2018, was signed by the Directorate General Defense Purchase, the body charged with buying Bangladesh’s military supplies. The manufacturer was said to be PicSix Hungary, an entity that does not exist according to Hungarian company filings.

    Al Jazeera obtained covert recordings of a middleman, James Moloney, admitting the IMSI-catcher was Israeli made. Moloney, an Irish national, owns a company called Sovereign Systems, which is registered in Singapore, though he, himself is based in Bangkok.

    [… Moloney] described the technology as “very aggressive and intrusive. You don’t want the public to know that you’re using that equipment.”

    [… more details…]

    Months of undercover reporting revealed that the head of the army, General Aziz Ahmed, is aiding two of his brothers to escape prison sentences for murder, and that he ordered officers to help create a false identity for one who fled to Europe.

    […]

    Bangladesh’s deployment generates significant funds for the Bangladeshi army and is prized as a mark of their international standing as a professional military force.

    The concern expressed by the UN will put the Bangladesh Ministry of Defence under mounting pressure to defend General Aziz who has so far not commented himself on the investigation. The Bangladesh army public relations office described the investigation as concocted and ill-intended.

  8. blf says

    Fox lurches further to the right to win back ‘hard-edge’ Trump supporters. As background, faux is apparently now in the 3rd place in the ratings (and ratings are one of the drivers of advertising fees; the higher the ratings, the more costly the ads, so the more revenue for faux):

    […]
    The response [to the ratings drop] from Fox News has not been a period of sombre self-reflection. Instead, the network seems to have made a chaotic lunge towards the right wing in recent weeks as hosts have dabbled in conspiracy theories and aggressively attacked the Joe Biden administration.

    […]

    As CNN and MSNBC, with their more liberal audiences rose to the top spots in January’s ratings, Americans who believe in the nonsensical QAnon conspiracy theory, or who harbor white nationalist beliefs, or who don’t trust vaccines, have all found themselves pandered to by Fox News, as it attempts to shore up its viewership.

    Nielsen numbers, published this week, found that Fox News ranked third out of the three main cable news channels in January. […]

    [… Senior fellow at the progressive media watchdog Media Matters, Matthew] Gertz said he had detected a shift at Fox as the network attempts to win back “the most hard-edge” Trump supporters.

    […] “Their business model really rests on them being number one, in a big way, and it appears they’re going to do anything they can to win that status back.”

    The plan to boost viewership so far seems to be based on an extremist push, led by its most prominent opinion hosts.

    Tucker Carlson, whose show is the most watched in cable news, is among those leading the charge. After Democrats called for a crackdown on white nationalists and domestic terrorism following a wave of extremist attacks, Carson had an interesting, and revealing, take for his audience.

    “They’re talking about you,”[] Carson told his viewers on 26 January.

    A day earlier, Carlson had defended QAnon […]

    Carlson’s colleagues Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, Fox News’s two other biggest stars, have waded into similar waters.

    […]

    It’s not just white nationalism and QAnon that are getting airtime on Fox News. Hannity has been accused of dabbling in anti-vaxx ideas […]

    […]

    The trend to the hard right hasn’t just come from the primetime stars. In January, CNN’s media correspondent, Brian Stelter, noted: “Tucker Carlson Tonight essentially expanded to Tucker Carlson Day and Night.”

    “Part of their strategy in the wake of losing parts of audience has been to de-emphasise the news side and really start bringing opinion side voices into the news hours,” Gertz said. “You see Fox opinion hosts being guests on those news programs as well.”

    Some of the moves Fox News has made in recent weeks seem to illustrate a de-emphasis on “straight news”. On 19 January, the day before Biden’s inauguration, the network fired Chris Stirewalt, the Fox News political editor who was the public face of the Arizona [Presidential election] call. […]

    The same day, Fox News laid off more than a dozen digital reporters — seen as relatively non-partisan journalists. A spokesperson for the network said it had realigned its business and reporting structure to meet the demands of this new era. [By firing digital journalists in this interweb-connected lockdown(-ish) time? –blf]

    Even Fox News’s less firebrand, daytime news anchors have courted controversy.

    After it emerged that Marjorie Taylor Greene […] had also suggested the Parkland, Florida, school shooting was a false flag and claimed that California forest fires had been started by Jewish space lasers, she found a defender in the Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer, who claimed a false equivalence between Greene and the Democrat Ilhan Omar. [Yeah, those famous mooslin orbital ray guns which, among other things, blew up the towers in New York City and made me cut my finger on a sharp knife this morning (I’m Ok, the lasers mostly missed)… –blf]

    […]

    Ultimately, the struggles at Fox News to represent radical elements of the right wing mirrors a problem facing the Republican party itself — where Trumpist politicians like Greene and more establishment[bribe-savvy] figures like Liz Cheney or Mitch McConnell wrestle for its future.

    “Rupert Murdoch and Fox News generally sees itself as mouthpiece of Republican party. They were moving away from conspiracy theorists, they were moving away from Trump and hoping to turn the page,” Jonathan Kaufman, professor and director of the school of journalism at Northeastern University, said.

    “But like the Republican party, Fox is discovering that Trumpism, and conspiracy theories, have taken deep root in the Republican party and in their viewers.”

      † Not set in eejit quotes because, whilst exaggerated hyperbole — most faux viewers were not, e.g., at the insurrection (albeit it’s possible most “support”, or at least fail to condemn, it) — it’s not substantially inaccurate (as far as I am currently aware).

  9. blf says

    Not really political… I live in a S.France Mediterranean seaside village a relatively short train ride from Marseille (close enough there are (pre-pandemic) commuters in both directions), and have done so for a rather long time now. Even so, I still (mostly) detest Marseille, albeit I could (pre-pandemic) point you to some excellent not-well-known restaurants and other attractions. So this Grauniad article was interesting, Marseille: a virtual tour through books, film, food and music. (I’ve not (yet) watched the videos (plural) at the link.) Some snippets:

    It’s impossible to be ambivalent about Marseille. Those of us who call the city home — native and adopted Marseillais — know that for some first-time visitors, it’s a place that doesn’t reveal its considerable charms as easily as other corners of southern France. Many bypass the boisterous Mediterranean port on their way to sleepy Provençal villages or the Côte d’Azur. […]

    Delete the “first-time” and I concur that it is (difficult to be) “impossible to be ambivalent about Marseille.”

    American TV chef Julia Child lived in Marseille in the early 1950s and appreciated it for all the ways it was not Paris. “To many of our northern French friends it was terra incognita: they had never been here, and considered it a rough, rude, ‘southern’ place. But it struck me as a rich broth of vigorous, emotional, uninhibited life,” she wrote in her autobiography, My Life in France.

    I think I totally get where Ms Child is coming from. Marseille certainly is not Paris — that’s perhaps one of Marseille’s strongest points (I detest Paris even more than I detest Marseille) — but I broadly concur with the colourful analogy to “a rich broth of vigorous, emotional, uninhibited life”.

  10. says

    Here’s a link to the February 5 Guardian coronavirus world liveblog (support the Guardian if you can!).

    Also – CNN – “Johnson & Johnson asks FDA to authorize its Covid-19 vaccine”:

    Johnson & Johnson officially asked the US Food and Drug Administration for an emergency use authorization of its Covid-19 vaccine Thursday, taking forward the possibility of a third coronavirus vaccine for the US market.

    “Today’s submission for Emergency Use Authorization of our investigational single-shot COVID-19 vaccine is a pivotal step toward reducing the burden of disease for people globally and putting an end to the pandemic,” Dr. Paul Stoffels, Chief Scientific Officer at Johnson & Johnson, said in a statement.

    The FDA has scheduled a public meeting of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee for Feb. 26. The independent group of experts will look at the data and make a recommendation that the agency takes into consideration when it makes a decision.

    This means an EUA will not come before the end of the month, if the FDA decides to grant one. But adding a third vaccine to the mix would add both supply and flexibility to the struggling US efforts to vaccinate the population.

    If the FDA decides to authorize the vaccine, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will meet to discuss whether the vaccine should be given to Americans and if so, who should get it first.

    This same regulatory process for Pfizer took a little over three weeks. For Moderna it was a little more than two.

    The US government has ordered 100 million doses and J&J says it can meet this commitment by June. “Upon authorization of our investigational COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use, we are ready to begin shipping,” Stoffels said.

  11. says

    Guardian world liveblog:

    The US recorded more than 5,000 Covid-19 deaths today. The surge, the highest number to date, seems to be largely due to a backlog of data that was just released from Indiana, adding 1,500 deaths to the countrywide number, according to the Wall Street Journal.

    Though cases have otherwise been slowing down, the death toll is often a reflection of what happened in the weeks prior, since it’s usually a lagging indicator of the virus spread. Yesterday, there were 5,077 US deaths in total, according to John Hopkins University data, and 122,473 new cases.

  12. says

    Guardian – “Alexei Navalny in court again on charge of defaming war veteran”:

    Alexei Navalny has appeared in a Moscow court for the second time this week, this time on a charge of defaming a second world war veteran.

    The Russian opposition leader, who was ordered earlier this week to serve two years and eight months in prison, criticised the latest hearing as a “disgusting PR trial” intended by the Kremlin to disparage him.

    Last June, Russia’s investigative committee launched an investigation into Navalny on charges of defamation, after the politician called people featured in a video promoting the constitutional reform that allowed an extension to President Vladimir Putin’s rule “corrupt stooges” “people without conscience” and “traitors”.

    The authorities maintained that Navalny’s comments “denigrate (the) honour and dignity” of a war veteran featured in the video. If convicted, Navalny faces a fine or community service.

    “This trial was conceived as some kind of PR trial, because the Kremlin needs headlines, ‘Navalny slandered a veteran’,” the politician said in the courtroom Friday….

  13. johnson catman says

    re SC @16: Can we just skip the movie and send Lindell and all of his like-minded republicans on to “heaven” so that the rest of us can have a sane country?

  14. says

    AP – “Hundreds protest coup in Myanmar as resistance spreads”:

    Hundreds of students and teachers took to Myanmar’s streets on Friday to demand the military hand power back to elected politicians, as resistance to a coup swelled with demonstrations in several parts of the country, even in the tightly controlled capital.

    In the largest rallies since the takeover, protesters at two universities in Yangon flashed a three-fingered salute, a sign of resistance borrowed from “The Hunger Games” movies, that they adopted from anti-government protesters in neighboring Thailand. They chanted “Long live Mother Suu” — a reference to ousted leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who has been detained — and “We don’t want military dictatorship.”

    “We will never be together with them,” lecturer Dr. Nwe Thazin said of the military at a protest at the Yangon University of Education. “We want that kind of government to collapse as soon as possible.”

    Resistance has been gathering steam since the military declared Monday that it would take power for one year — a shocking setback for the Southeast Asian country that had been making significant, if uneven progress, toward democracy after decades of military rule. The opposition began with people banging pots and pans outside their windows in Yangon, the country’s largest city — under the cover of darkness each evening to avoid being targeted. But now people are beginning to take to the streets, including students and medical workers, some of whom are refusing to work.

    Students have been central to previous protest movements against military dictatorship.

    The military has tried to quash the opposition with selective arrests and by blocking Facebook to prevent users from organizing demonstrations. Facebook is the primary tool for accessing information on the internet for most people in Myanmar, where traditional media is state-controlled or self-censored because of threats of legal action by the state.

    The latest politician detained is Win Htein, a senior member of Suu Kyi’s deposed National League for Democracy party.

    Despite that pushback, on Friday, about 200 people joined the protest at the Yangon University of Education, and a similar number marched at the city’s Dagon University, with many carrying papers printed with images of red ribbons — the symbol of the civil disobedience campaign that Suu Kyi’s party has called for.

    Leading that march were four students carrying the party’s peacock-adorned red flag. At the student union, another held a sign saying, in English, “soldier back to barrack!”

    There was also at least one demonstration Friday in Naypyitaw — highly unusual for city, which was purpose-built under the previous military government, has a heavy military presence and lacks the tradition of protest of the former capital, Yangon. Medical staff at the city’s biggest hospital gathered behind a big banner condemning the coup. Medical personnel have been at the forefront of the resistance.

    Another protest was held in Myanmar’s southern Tanintharyi Region, where about 50 chanting people marched, reported the online news agency Dawei Watch.

    According to Myanmar’s Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, at least 133 officials or lawmakers and 14 civil society activists were detained by the military in connection with its takeover, though some have already been released. The NLD has said Suu Kyi and ousted President Win Myint are being held on minor charges unrelated to their official duties — seen by many as merely providing a legal veneer for the military to detain them.

    The takeover has been criticized by U.S. President Joe Biden and others internationally who pushed for the elected government to be restored.

    Protests against the coup were also held Friday in India, Indonesia and South Korea, sometimes led by people from Myanmar….

  15. says

    Matthew Gertz:

    OAN is airing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s documentary about how the election was stolen for twelve consecutive hours today.

    Here’s the disclaimer at the top indicating that it is paid programming, “opinion only,” and OAN doesn’t endorse statements re: Dominion/Smartmatic.

    [full disclaimer at the link]

    What kind of news network lets you buy 12 consecutive hours of airtime for your conspiracy theory rants? One that has no standards and is desperate for cash.

  16. says

    Marjorie Greene is tweeting:

    I woke up early this morning literally laughing thinking about what a bunch of morons the Democrats (+11) are for giving some one like me free time.

    In this Democrat tyrannical government, Conservative Republicans have no say on committees anyway.

    Oh this is going to be fun!

    First 10 who voted for the impeachment of President Trump.

    Then 11 who voted with Democrats against me, opening the door for every Republican to be taken.

    The base is keeping list of these type of “R’s.”

    They’re fed up.

    This type of betrayal will cost us the majority in ‘22.

    She’s doing a press conference at 11.

    So she seems to have really given some thoughtful consideration to her harmful actions. Good job, 199 Republicans.

  17. says

    Six more companies will be producing at-home tests, eventually making millions available.

    The military is being deployed to help at vaccination sites.

    Deaths are now beginning to decline, following declines in cases and hospitalizations. But all remain high.

    The CDC is releasing a report about the effectiveness of state mask mandates.

  18. says

    Three areas in which the Defense Production Act is being used: materials for Pfizer to ramp up vaccine production, surgical gloves (factories will be built in the US to make the materials and the gloves themselves), at-home tests (61 million to be produced).

  19. blf says

    US citizen newborns sent to Mexico under Trump-era border ban (Grauniad edits in {curly braces})… Trigger Warning: Multiple very distressing examples contained within the link (redacted from the below excerpt):

     

     

     

    […]
    At least 11 migrant women were dropped off in Mexican border towns without birth certificates for their days-old US citizen newborns since March of last year […].

    Based on multiple conversations with lawyers who work with asylum seekers at the border and a review of hospital records and legal documents, multiple US citizen newborns were removed to Mexico after their mothers were subject to a Trump-era border ban that the Biden-Harris administration has been slow to rescind.

    Advocates suspect the actual number of such cases could be higher because the vast majority of these fast-track expulsions, as the administration calls them, have occurred away from the public eye and without the involvement of lawyers.

    […]

    The hair furor rule being used here is “Title 42”, from the CDC(!) as part of hair furor’s mostly non-existent response to the pandemic: “The rule allowed CBP officials to summarily expel all migrants who entered the US without authorization, instead of letting them access the legal avenue to request protection, even those seeking asylum.”

    [… O]fficials can exempt people on a case-by-case basis and grant entry in case of humanitarian or public interest considerations.

    “Immigration {agencies have} the authority to be able to prevent that from happening but they’re refusing to do that,” said Luis M Gonzalez, a lawyer with the Jewish Family Services, who has represented two cases in which migrant mothers and their US citizen newborns were expelled. “They are placing {the} lives of US citizens in danger. In this case, newborns.”

    […]

    On 2 February, Joe Biden issued an executive order directing his officials to “promptly review” Title 42 among other border policies. But advocates have been frustrated that more decisive, quicker action hasn’t already been taken. On 29 January, a three-judge panel comprising conservative judges appointed by Trump overturned a lower court decision to block the rule from applying to unaccompanied minors.

    In a statement Tuesday, Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, called it “troubling” that Biden’s orders “did not include immediate action to rescind and unwind more of the unlawful and inhumane policies that this administration inherited — and now owns”.

    A CBP spokesperson, who asked the information she provided be attributed to the agency, said the agency does not track how many women with US citizen newborns were subject to Title 42 and declined to answer other questions about such cases. Per policy, CBP does not comment on individual cases due to privacy reasons […] Hospitals are responsible for providing birth certificates and CBP does not hinder individuals, regardless of immigrations status, from acquiring birth certificates for US citizen children.

    [… some very distressing ‘Kafka-esque’ (a quote from Mitra Ebadolahi of the ACLU) examples of seemingly extra-judicial summary expulsions by the stormtroopers…]

    [… One mother] said she’d like Americans to know: border officials told her before her expulsion to Reynosa that her daughter would not be able to get a birth certificate because she was born to parents who were migrants without rights. Her daughter would not have rights either, they said. [Note the contradiction with what teh stormtoopers told the Guardian above, CBP does not hinder individuals, regardless of immigrations status, from acquiring birth certificates for US citizen children –blf]

  20. Tethys says

    Quoting the excreable MTG from 20.

    Then 11 who voted with Democrats against me, opening the door for every Republican to be taken.
    The base is keeping list of these type of “R’s.”
    They’re fed up.

    Oh honey, the D side has a list too and we plan to primary every single R congress critter that did not vote to get rid of you, or voted to impede democracy on jan 6th.

    Plenty of conservative Rs in my state are also entirely fed up with the lying, gun toting, lunatic branch of their ‘party’.

  21. blf says

    Russia expels European diplomats over Navalny protests, EU ‘strongly condemns’ move:

    Russia on Friday said it was expelling diplomats from Germany, Poland and Sweden for participating in unauthorised demonstrations in support of jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny, a move the EU’s top diplomat and several European leaders condemned as “unjustified” and “completely unfounded”.

    The Russian foreign ministry said in a statement that an unspecified number of diplomats from the three EU countries took part in illegal demonstrations on January 23 and had been declared persona non grata. Tens of thousands of people across Russia took to the streets that day to protest the arrest of Navalny […].

    […]

    Reacting to the announcement Friday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel denounced the expulsions as “unjustified”.

    […]

    The Swedish foreign ministry also called the decision to expel one of its diplomats “completely unfounded”.

    […]

    Poland meanwhile summoned the Russian ambassador in Warsaw and the Polish foreign ministry issued a statement noting that, “The Polish side expects the Russian authorities to reverse this erroneous decision … Otherwise, Poland leaves itself the option to take appropriate steps.”

    […]

    [… C]alls are growing from some nations for the EU to bulk up on sanctions it slapped on six Russian officials in October over the nerve agent poisoning that left Navalny fighting for his life in Germany.

    EU foreign ministers last week agreed they would revisit the issue if he was not released.

    […]

    Navalny himself called at the European Parliament last year […] for sanctions to hit the oligarchs and money-men he accuses of protecting Putin’s wealth.

    […]

    For Moscow the [current] visit [of EU’s top diplomat Josep Borrell] looks set to be used as a chance both to deflect from its own issues and show that the West still wants to talk to it regardless.

    “On the one hand, the Kremlin is eager to portray the EU as a weak actor with a lot of internal problems,” said Susan Stewart from the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.

    “On the other hand, despite official rhetoric, the Kremlin is still keen to demonstrate that western actors are interested in cooperating with Russia, since this increases its status and legitimacy,” she told AFP[.]

  22. says

    AJ – “Brazil’s Bolsonaro faces probe after hospitals ran out of oxygen”:

    Brazil’s prosecutor-general has opened a preliminary investigation into the country’s president and health minister for possible negligence in response to the COVID-19 outbreak in Manaus city, according to a document seen by the Reuters news agency.

    Located deep in the Amazon rainforest, Manaus has been hit hard by a brutal second wave of cases that has stretched emergency services to breaking point.

    The city’s hospitals ran out of oxygen in January, prompting the federal government to fly in supplies from across the country in an attempt to save people from suffocating to death.

    The region is also the birthplace of a coronavirus variant, with similar mutations to those from Britain and South Africa, that researchers say is more transmissible and may be worsening the situation in the city.

    The probe into President Jair Bolsonaro and Health Minister Eduardo Pazuello, revealed by Prosecutor-General Augusto Aras in a document sent to Supreme Court Justice Ricardo Lewandowski, follows requests by eight federal congressmen from the far-left Communist Party of Brazil for an investigation.

    In the document, Aras said he had begun an “initial inquiry”. This can precede a more formal investigation known in Brazil as an “inquerito,” a type of probe that would require the court’s approval.

    “If, eventually, reasonable indications of possible wrongdoing come to light … a request for the beginning of an ‘inquerito’ will be submitted to the Supreme Court,” the document read.

    Last year, a group of unions representing Brazilian health workers had also urged the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate Bolsonaro’s government for crimes against humanity over its handling of the pandemic.

    On Thursday, a social media post by a teleSUR TV correspondent showed protesters in Parana State protesting against Bolsonaro’s handling of the pandemic, accusing him of genocide and asking him to resign.

    The Bolsonaro administration has also been accused of acting slowly in acquiring vaccines, thus delaying its vaccination roll out.

    The delays leave Brazil’s 210 million residents vulnerable to one of the worst coronavirus outbreaks on the planet.

    As of Friday, Brazil has reported at least 228,000 deaths from COVID-19, second only to the United States, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. It has begun a vaccination campaign but less than 0.5 percent of the population have so far received the shot.

    While many nations have struggled to obtain vaccines as manufacturers strive to meet global demand, Brazil was better positioned than many. It has a long history of successful inoculation drives and its state-funded production facilities can churn out vaccines at scale.

    The federal government squandered those advantages, said Marcia Castro, a native Brazilian and professor at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health in Boston in the US.

    “It’s a succession of errors that began from the start of the pandemic,” she said. “And sadly, we’re measuring those mistakes in the number of deaths.”

    Bolsonaro – who contracted the coronavirus last year and says he will not take any COVID-19 shot – has defended his government’s vaccine roll out. “With respect, nobody would do better than my government is doing,” he said in a January 15 television interview.

    Bolsonaro has also downplayed the pandemic, comparing the virus to a “little flu” and attacking stay-at-home measures imposed by local authorities to contain its spread.

  23. says

    Democracy Now! – “‘A Moral Catastrophe’: Africa CDC Head Says Lack of Vaccines for the Continent Will Imperil World”:

    Countries across the African continent are facing a second COVID-19 outbreak, linked to a variant first found in South Africa that has been detected in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Comoros and Zambia and more than 20 non-African countries so far. There is concern new variants, which scientists believe are more infectious, could spread the virus further before widespread vaccination begins. More than 40 African countries have been hit by this second wave, and just six have received relatively small shipments of vaccines. John Nkengasong, director of the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, says the world faces “a moral catastrophe” without vaccine equity. “It has to be very clear that no part of the world will be safe until all parts of the world are safe,” he says. “We either come out of this together or we go down together. There’s no middle ground in this.”

    AMY GOODMAN: In a webinar last month about Africa’s COVID-19 vaccine financing and deployment strategy, South African President Ramaphosa, who’s also the outgoing chair of the African Union, that’s holding its meeting this weekend, said, quote, “The painful irony is that some of the clinical trials for these vaccines were carried out in Africa.” So, Dr. Nkengasong, talk about that. Talk about Africa being used as the experimentation site, but then, when it comes to reaping the benefits of the vaccines that prove to be safe, you’re last in line.

    JOHN NKENGASONG: I think it’s unfortunate. When I used the word that we may be heading towards a “moral catastrophe,” I meant it. In 1996, when drugs to treat HIV were available, it took 10 years before those drugs were finally accessible on the continent. And between 1996 and 2006, 12 million Africans died — and, I underline, unnecessarily. I think we should really make sure that the history, that sad page of our history, does not occur again, especially with this pandemic. So I think we are very, very worried that we may be heading towards that direction if something is not done and done urgently….

  24. says

    Greene’s press conference earlier:

    Marjorie Taylor Greene is railing about immigrants and abortion to open her first press conference after being stripped of her committee assignments

    Now she’s on a tangent about random stuff she doesen’t like. Very Trumpian!

    Marjorie Taylor Greene pulls out the white supremacy defense, “My Republican colleagues are being told that their white skin makes them racist.”

    Asked to denounce white supremacy, Marjorie Taylor Greene ends the press conference

    Reminder that a vast majority of Republicans knew all of this about MTG and still rallied around her. She is not an outlier!

  25. says

    Nerd @8, thanks for posting that link. That segment was excellent, and as far as I know, Rachel was the only one to focus on that aspect of Hair Furor’s post-presidency, crazy-pants, farcical performances. (PZ also posted about that weird behavior on Trump’s part.)

    In other news: Romney jolts policy debate with plan for new benefit for children

    Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign fell short for a variety of reasons, but one of the Republican’s problems stood out: Romney voiced broad opposition to using government to make a material difference in Americans’ lives.

    In the infamous “47 percent” video, for example, Romney told a group of wealthy donors that nearly half of Americans are lazy parasites, looking for government handouts. It came amidst a nonsensical ad campaign in which he peddled ugly claims about President Obama and “welfare.”

    After Election Day 2012, he kept this going, telling donors that Obama won re-election because he bribed women and minorities with “big gifts,” such as access to affordable health care and education.

    Nearly a decade later, Romney remains a conservative Republican, but his willingness to extend “big gifts” to American families has clearly evolved. The Washington Post reported yesterday morning:

    Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) on Thursday will propose providing at least $3,000 per child to millions of American families, lending bipartisan support to President Biden’s push to dramatically expand child benefits. Romney’s proposal would provide $4,200 per year for every child up to the age of 6, as well as $3,000 per year for every child age 6 to 17.

    That would benefit a lot of his constituents in Utah, Mormon families with a lot of children. Of course, it would benefit other families as well.

    At the risk of over-simplifying matters, Romney’s proposal would make direct deposits into parents’ bank accounts, by way of the Social Security Administration, with the intention of vastly improving child-poverty rates.

    It’s no secret as to why this matters: Democratic officials are working on crafting a similar policy of their own in the upcoming COVID relief package.[…] Romney’s blueprint would be slightly more generous than the Dems’ plan for younger children.

    […] Democrats aren’t going to love how the Utah Republican intends to pay for the program. As Eric Levitz explained:

    Romney’s bill would eliminate the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) and the Head of Household (HoH) tax-filing status, while reducing the value of the EITC to workers with children, and ending federal funding for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).

    […] scaling back the Earned Income Tax Credit opens the door to leaving some struggling families worse off.

    […] Romney has made no effort to hide his opposition to the ambitious COVID relief plan backed by President Joe Biden. Democrats might embrace the senator’s proposal — or at least big chunks of it — only to have the Utahan vote against the package anyway.

    […] Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) released a statement late Thursday strongly criticizing Romney’s plan as “welfare assistance” and comparing it to a universal basic income program typically supported by the left.

    […] I won’t pretend to know how this will turn out, but it’s worth pausing to appreciate (a) the fact that we’re in the midst of a real policy discussion, as if we had some kind of healthy political system in which debates over substantive details matter; and (b) policymakers are exploring how, not whether, to extend a hand to families that could use the help.

  26. says

    Bits and pieces of news:

    The Nebraska Republican Party State Central Committee is reportedly planning to censure Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) because he criticized Donald Trump after last month’s attack on the Capitol. The senator yesterday released a five-minute video directed at state GOP leaders in which Sasse said, “Politics isn’t about the weird worship of one dude. The party can purge Trump skeptics. But I’d like to convince you that not only is that civic cancer for the nation, it’s just terrible for our party.”
    —————–
    In Colorado, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), one of Congress’ new right-wing members, already has several Democratic rivals, including state Sen. Kerry Donovan (D) who launched a campaign yesterday.
    ——————-
    Returning to his broadcasting roots, former Vice President Mike Pence will partner with the Young America’s Foundation to host a new podcast. In the 1990s, Pence hosted a radio show in which he pushed a variety of strange ideas, including once accusing Disney of hiding political propaganda in animated films.

    Link

  27. says

    GOP’s McCarthy keeps trying, failing to make sound choices

    House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made a series of important decisions since Election Day 2020. They’ve all been spectacularly wrong.

    The Washington Post’s Michael Gerson, a former George W. Bush speechwriter, used his new column to describe House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) as “the United States’ most disgraceful political leader.”

    Seldom has a political figure misunderstood his country and its challenges more comprehensively than McCarthy. This is not a time for balancing; it is a time for choosing.

    The assessment is more than fair given the House GOP leader’s record, especially over the last few months. McCarthy seems to confront every challenge by carefully trying to thread political needles, but in the process, [he] lacks the wherewithal to make sound and responsible choices.

    On Nov. 6, for example, McCarthy appeared on Fox News and falsely insisted that Donald Trump had won the 2020 presidential election. “Everyone who’s listening, do not be quiet,” the Republican told Fox News viewers. “We cannot allow this to happen before our very eyes.”

    On Dec. 11, McCarthy signed his name to a ridiculous legal brief, asking the Supreme Court to overturn election results for no reason.

    On Jan. 13, McCarthy conceded that Donald Trump “bears responsibility” for the attack on the U.S. Capitol — a position the Minority Leader espoused while pleading with members not to hold Trump responsible. The congressman soon after contradicted his own position.

    On Jan. 28, McCarthy humiliated himself by traveling to Mar-a-Lago to effectively kiss Trump’s ring.

    On Feb. 2, McCarthy met privately with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.). Soon after, he tried to strike a bizarre deal with Democrats in which Greene would be removed from one committee, but not two. The offer was swiftly rejected as absurd.

    On Feb. 3, McCarthy announced he wasn’t prepared to do anything about Greene’s record of extremism and radicalism. He proceeded to pretend not to know anything about the deranged QAnon conspiracy theory. [He] was quickly exposed as dishonest.

    McCarthy proceeded to defend Greene, accepting Greene’s denials at face value, failing to do his due diligence and realize that she wasn’t telling the truth.

    He then allowed a measure stripping Greene of her committee assignments to reach the House floor, putting his own members in a difficult position, and failing to present them with accurate information.

    McCarthy’s congressional career has been filled with unfortunate missteps — remember when he appeared on Fox News and admitted that his party’s Benghazi Committee was a political tool intended to hurt Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign? — but by all appearances, he’s actually getting worse at his job.

  28. says

    BREAKING: The labor board has denied Amazon’s request to stop the union election from going forward at its Alabama warehouse. Ballots are scheduled to go out in the mail Monday morning. This thing is on.

    Amazon asked the board to review its case arguing that the election should happen in-person during a full-blown pandemic. In a two-sentence order the board said it found “no substantial issues warranting review.” Amazon’s motion to stay also denied.

    Oof. Even two GOP members of the board shot down Amazon here, essentially saying there’s no good reason for an in-person vote in this case. That’s got to sting.

    The full NLRB order rejecting Amazon’s request to stay the election can be read here:…”

  29. says

    Greene Speech To Fluff Up Rightwing Bona Fides Quickly Devolves Into Media Slugfest

    When Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) took the stage Friday morning, she opened with a calmer tone than followers of her political career are used to hearing.

    It was “American carnage”-lite: she painted a country strewn with murderous “illegal aliens,” dead babies in wombs, ships full of American tax dollars being sent overseas. But she also reminded the crowd multiple times that she is a mother, told a story of a student bringing guns to her school when she felt the “fear” familiar to David Hogg, a survivor of the Parkland massacre that she once harassed. It seemed an attempt to humanize herself, as she beseeched the press to “tell my story a little bit better,” not just her conspiracy theories.

    But things quickly devolved. It felt like speeches given by […] Trump, when he would hew to a teleprompter for the first portion of his speech before ad-libbing what he really wanted to talk about.

    “I was in the chamber unlike AOC,” Greene shot, describing the insurrection. She then claimed that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) “faked her outrage with another hoax.”

    Greene, who peddled conspiracy theories about evil, pedophilic Democratic politicians and staged school shootings, who posted a picture of herself carrying a machine gun beside scared-looking Reps. Cortez, Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (R-MI), scolded the assembled reporters for “addicting the nation to hate.”

    The speech was ostensibly meant to buff up her image the morning after every House Democrat and 11 House Republicans voted to strip her of her committee assignments, just 32 days after she was sworn in. While she has a rich history of offensive comments, a set of recently unearthed social media posts in which she mused about the potential execution of Democratic lawmakers was the tipping point.

    On Friday, she said that she was glad to be kicked off of her committees, given the “tyrannically controlled government,” since she’d be wasting her time there anyway. She said that she’d be spending her time instead building a mass of support that she “already got started” — she has claimed to have raised well over $1 million in fundraising off of her scandals so far.

    She ended the press conference in a way strikingly familiar to those who watched Trump’s press conferences over the past four years: a verbal fistfight with the reporters asking her questions. When the first reporter asked if she would apologize, Greene immediately asked what outlet they were with. Upon finding out it was CNN, she launched into a counter-interrogation, demanding that the reporter apologize for “lying about President Trump” with the “Russian conspiracy.”

    She refused to apologize for harassing Hogg and tut-tutted at reporters’ insistence on getting her apologies on the record, comparing it to Trump being repeatedly asked if he denounced white supremacy.

    She decided she’d had enough when a reporter started to ask about the Facebook post Greene liked saying that “a bullet to the head would be quicker” to remove House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) from office.

    “That’s your problem. And that’s how we end press conferences,” she said, whipping her speech off the lectern with a flourish.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/greene-speech-committee-media

  30. says

    Follow-up to comment 43.

    Comments post by readers of the TPM article:

    When it comes to infantile displays of pique, this woman never disappoints. So glad she’s the new face of the GQP.
    ——————–
    Craves the spotlight, but never expected to actually get elected. And now has no friggin’ clue as to what’s involved / required.
    ——————-
    OK press here’s your chance to shine, next week don’t go, or send one pool reporter. If you starve it of attention then in a few weeks you’ll have something bigger to report on.
    ——————–
    Sounds a lot like a certain ex-Pres “resigning” from SAG.
    ———————-
    Correctly characterized as “cancerous,” she needs to be removed completely, not just off of committees. Like Donnie, she abuses and then claims to be the victim of abuse. She’s a sociopath.

  31. says

    Biden Hopes To Convert Anti-Maskers In Super Bowl Video Message

    President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden have taped a video message aimed at urging Americans to mask up and building public confidence around vaccinating against COVID-19 that will be shown before the Super Bowl on Sunday, according to a CNN report Friday.

    An administration official told CNN that the White House will use a message thanking health care workers that will air during Sunday’s event to strengthen trust around getting vaccinated against COVID-19 and to make an appeal to wear masks aimed at communities that have, in the wake of former President Trump’s politicization efforts, continued to refuse to wear face coverings.

    The Super Bowl blitz would function as part of the Biden campaign promise to focus on mask-wearing as the central battleground for fighting the spread of coronavirus during his first 100 days in office.

    The White House has been in touch with the NFL and brands involved in the Super Bowl on ways to push messaging around masking and vaccines during the highly-televised event, a White House official told CNN. […]

  32. says

    Greene has now confirmed exactly who she is and has long been and will continue to be. She holds no real position of power. I hope she drops out of the news cycle after today.

  33. says

    Conservatives tried to smear AOC on Twitter, but users hijacked the hashtag with cuteness overload

    K-pop fans are back to the rescue on Twitter. Known for hijacking hashtags on the social media platform with photos and videos of K-pop performers, K-pop fans encouraged users to flood the hashtag #AOCLied with photos of popular K-pop stars and people’s pets. By doing so tweets criticizing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez were disrupted with photos of adorable puppies, cats and other pets. […]

  34. says

    Republicans are afraid that Trump’s second impeachment trial is going to be ’embarassing’

    Donald Trump has been impeached for his role in using lies and incendiary language, over a period of months, to subvert the 2020 election, obstruct the business of the nation, and “gravely endanger the security of the United States and its institutions.” Those articles of impeachment have been forwarded to the Senate, along with supporting documents, to show that Donald J. Trump is uniquely responsible for the Jan. 6 assault on the United States Capitol, and that his behavior on that day “was not an isolated event.”

    Unsurprisingly, House impeachment managers intend to focus on exactly these issues: Trump’s words, actions, and inactions as they relate to violence on Jan. 6. That includes how Trump encouraged the presence of white nationalist militias, lied repeatedly about the outcome of the election in ways meant to inflame his supporters, drove the whole mass toward the Capitol, and stood aside in pleasure as insurgents swarmed the halls of Congress.

    Just as expected is the response from Trump’s legal team and from Republicans in the Senate. Because they want Trump’s second impeachment trial to be about anything other than the subject of his impeachment.

    […] As eternal Trump advisor Steve Bannon notes, “The Democrats have a very emotional and compelling case. They’re going to try to convict him in the eyes of the American people and smear him forever.”

    Yes. Because showing Trump’s words next to the results is “very emotional and compelling.”

    […] It doesn’t matter if Trump believes his own lies. That doesn’t excuse his actions in undercutting American institutions or encouraging violent action. Trump can be as upset by his defeat as he likes—many other election losers were also upset. But whether it was Andrew Jackson or Al Gore, “all of these Presidential candidates accepted the election results and acquiesced to the peaceful transfer of power required by the Constitution.”

    Trump’s situation is unique. And his despicable actions deserve to be uniquely punished. If the Senate Republicans have already stopped their ears to the truth, that case will be made to the public.

    If Republicans are embarrassed, it’s because they should be.

  35. says

    From Wonkette:

    So you know the nuns that showed up to the insurrection on January 6 and were spotted hanging around some Oath Keepers, wearing ginormous TRUMP sashes over their full-on traditional habits? [Photos at the link.]

    Who Trump even addressed directly at a Michigan rally back in October? Who had their own little “Stand Up Against Socialism” rally in Michigan? Even though that’s totally ironic because nuns are literal communists? Like they live in a commune and share their resources? Like communists? [More photos at the link.]

    Well guess what! They’re not real nuns! Fake nuns! Pretend nuns! Fugazi nuns!

    Well, not real nuns according to the Catholic Church anyway. They dress up as nuns, they call themselves “The Dominican Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary,” they live in a convent where they make honey and hang out with geese, but they are not real Catholic nuns. If I wrapped a towel over my head and started singing “Dominique,” I would be as much of an actual Catholic nun as these ladies are. If you were put in WITSEC and then placed in a nunnery for your own protection where you taught all of the nuns to sing Motown hits and took them on a journey within themselves, you would be as much of an actual Catholic nun as these ladies are.

    The National Catholic Register reports:

    “The Dominican Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are not, at present, in full communion with the Catholic Church and thus have no canonical standing within the Church,” a spokesman for the Diocese of Lansing, Michigan, told NCR via email.

    The Leadership Conference of Women Religious and the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious, the two associations of Catholic women religious in the United States, also confirmed to NCR that the Dominican Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are not members of either body. They are also not listed in the Official Catholic Directory, the only authorized directory listing official Catholic institutions and organizations.

    And Catholics are not too happy about this.

    “If people present themselves as religious with no recognition by the church, it’s a misrepresentation and can cause scandal on the part of those who believe that they are legitimate and recognized religious in the church,” Mercy Sr. Sharon Euart, executive director of the Resource Center for Religious Institutes, told NCR.

    Of course, there have been actual Catholic nuns at Trump rallies before — the ones you always see in the purple habits are from the Children of Mary order, and there was that other nun who spoke at the Republican National Convention last year; they are actual nuns.

    But the Dominican Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are sedevacantists — meaning that they’re super conservative schismatic TradCaths who like to pretend that Vatican II never happened, that the Holy See has actually been vacant (sede meaning seat, vacant meaning vacant) since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958, and who still do Latin Mass. […]

    As sedevacantists don’t recognize the Holy See, the Holy See also does not recognize them and basically just considers them some weirdos playing dress-up as nuns. They do not appear to have their own Antipope, however, which means Trump still has a shot at holding an office of some sort again.

    https://www.wonkette.com/trump-nuns-not-even-real-nuns

  36. blf says

    Lynna@38, “Nerd@8, thanks for posting that link.”

    Yes !
    Apropos of nothing, by coincidence, I was watching that very link when I noticed Lynna’s comment… whilst also finishing off tonight’s vin (a nice rosé from the Loire Valley which went quite well with the Gnocchi and spicy sausage with cheese)… and hoping the mildly deranged one won’t notice it was her cheese (she didn’t immediately eat it, so it’s fair game)… and mid-video, realising I had to put the garbage out now (there’s a small window between when you can put the garbage by the street to be collected and the collection).

  37. blf says

    The Proud Boys are Using a Christian Crowdfunding Site to Raise Money for Legal Expenses:

    […]
    There are currently at least four active crowdfunding campaigns for Proud Boys members on GiveSendGo, including former InfoWars staffer and Proud Boys organizer Joe Biggs, Proud Boys Hawaii founder Nicholas Ochs, and Ethan Nordean, the self-described Sergeant of Arms of the Seattle Chapter of the Proud Boys. All were arrested last month in connection to the Jan 6 insurrection.

    All Patriots are being dragged through the legal system rather than those who truly incited violence and destruction, read Biggs’ fundraising page.

    […]

    This is not the first time that the Proud Boys have attempted to fundraise on GiveSendGo. The group’s leader, Enrique Tarrio, launched his own defense fund after he was arrested upon his arrival to Washington DC last month and charged with destruction of property and two felony counts of possession of high-capacity firearm magazines. The campaign raised more than $113,000 and remains active on the site.

    It is worth noting that GiveSendGo’s own terms of service explicitly prohibit “hate, violence, racial intolerance, or the financial exploitation of a crime.” By hosting violent campaigners currently under investigation for their role in an attempted overthrow of the US government, GiveSendGo appears to be violating its own mandate. Right Wing Watch has reached out to GiveSendGo about the Proud Boys members’ fundraising campaigns and will update this story should the company respond.

    GiveSendGo came under fire last year for hosting a fundraising campaign for Kyle Rittenhouse, the 17-year-old who was charged in the fatal shootings of two people during an anti-racism protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin last year. The campaign raised $585,940 from more than 13,500 donors. Despite a viral petition and criticism from fellow Christian groups, […] GiveSendGo defended its Rittenhouse campaign, with CFO Jacob Wells claiming that everything we do and what our platform delivers is Christ-centered.

    […]

  38. says

    More re my #498 on the previous thread – TPM – “‘We Must Do Better’: Tlaib, In Tears, Urges Colleagues To Reckon With Capitol Insurrection”:

    Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) on Thursday night made an emotional plea to her fellow lawmakers to take the deadly Capitol insurrection that ex-President Donald Trump incited on January 6 seriously, recounting the hate she’s had to face as one of the first Muslims to be elected to Congress.

    “This is so personal. This is so hard because as many of my colleagues know, my closet colleagues know, on my very first day of orientation, I got my first death threat,” Tlaib said while in tears on the House floor. “It was a serious one. They took me aside, the FBI.”

    “I didn’t even get sworn in yet and someone wanted me dead for just existing,” she continued. “More came later. Uglier, more violent.”

    Tlaib recalled threats that mentioned her son by name and celebrated the New Zealand mosque massacre that was carried out by a white supremacist in 2019.

    “Each one paralyzed me each time,” the congresswoman said. “So what happened on January 6, all I could do is thank Allah I wasn’t here. I felt overwhelming relief.”

    Tlaib described how she worries “every day” for her diverse staff and that she “never thought that they would feel unsafe here.”

    “And so I urge my colleagues to please, please take what happened on January 6 seriously,” she said. “It will lead to more death and we can do better. We must do better.”…

    Video atl.

  39. blf says

    The Onion, Fauci Warns Public Against Holding Any Large-Scale Celebrations Commemorating February 1708 Release Of JS Bach’s Cantata ‘Gott Ist Mein König’:

    Acknowledging that it would be painful for many Americans to cancel their plans for the cherished national tradition, Dr Anthony Fauci warned the public Friday against holding any large-scale celebrations commemorating the historic February release of Johann Sebastian Bach’s 1708 cantata “Gott Ist Mein König.” “Look, folks, I know that many of us were hoping that we could gather in our frock coats alongside our loved ones and friends to pay tribute to Bach’s inimitable baroque cantata, but this year that’s just not in the cards,” said the NIAID director, adding that while he felt the country’s pain at losing the chance to revel in the rich history of the 18th-century composer’s festive instrumental, he still strongly recommended against gathering the full orchestra of 3 trumpets, timpani, 2 recorders, 2 oboes, a bassoon, viola da gamba, and a continuo in an indoor setting due to coronavirus concerns. “[…] I would recommend just putting your white powdered wigs and knee breeches back into storage, enjoying a pipe organ recital, and maybe reading Johann Heermann’s hymn ‘O Gott, du frommer Gott’ around the dinner table with your close family. […]” At press time, Fauci was strongly urging Americans to consider safety concerns before giving into the temptation to travel back to Bach’s birthplace of Eisenach, Germany.

    (I’m listening to the Michaelstein Telemann Chamber Orchestra at St Mary’s Church, Mühlhausen (video; performance picked at random) as I type this.

    Also from the Onion, Americans Scrambling For Covid Vaccine After CDC Director Announces Thousands Of Doses Buried Somewhere In California (Onion’s edits in {curly braces}) — there’s an amusing image at the link:

    Piling into motorcycles, biplanes, rowboats, and any other means of conveyance available to them, millions of Americans began scrambling for a coronavirus vaccine Friday after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced thousands of doses were buried somewhere in California. “As soon as {CDC Director Rochelle} Walensky dropped that cryptic hint that a tremendous cache of doses was hidden in a California state park, my brother and I began racing across the country to be the first ones there,” said local man Phineas K Rogue, rushing to commandeer a firetruck after a rival vaccine-seeker shot an arrow through his hot air balloon, causing it to deflate. […] At press time, Rogue and his brother were forced to recalibrate their strategy after plowing through a barn led to their vehicle becoming covered in dozens of clucking chickens.

  40. KG says

    In the 1990s, Pence hosted a radio show in which he pushed a variety of strange ideas, including once accusing Disney of hiding political propaganda in animated films. – Lynna, OM@40 quoting Steve Benen

    Actually, the political propaganda in Disney wasn’t hidden at all!.

  41. blf says

    KG@54, The “secret” messages in Disney films conspiracy theory has been around for forever… if my memory is correct (which can be disputed), I was reading about it on this (then-)new-fangled invention called clay tablets. Putting aside deliberately embedded jokes by the illustrators (which certainly do exist), I have no idea if there is anything to the claim. A quick search finds a lot of Highly Dubious sites making such claims, but a very Very Quick random(-ish) sampling suggests hyperactive imaginations and pareidolia are at work…

  42. says

    Talia Lavin at MSNBC – “Police have enough power. The Capitol riots shouldn’t give them more.”:

    In the country with the highest incarceration rates in the world, in which carceral punishment is often one of the only areas of bipartisan agreement and the criminalization of any number of human behaviors is as natural as breathing, it seems to make sense that the solution to a moment of mass trauma and upheaval is to increase the scope and powers of law enforcement yet again.

    But in the aftermath of the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, we’ve also been witness to a long-building, entirely public case for law enforcement’s unique unsuitability to address white-supremacist extremism plaguing the U.S. In the wake of the riot, when a volatile mixture of radicalized Trump supporters, militia members, neo-Nazi extremists and white vigilantes stormed the seat of government in hope of inflicting violence on lawmakers, many commentators have pressed for new federal laws cracking down on domestic terrorism, for broad revivification of the charge of “seditious conspiracy” and for more resources to be poured into the U.S.’s massive surveillance state to clamp down on white extremists.

    It’s not just theoretical, either: In Florida, Mississippi and Indiana, The Intercept has reported, legislatures have begun to further criminalize protest, introducing draconian new anti-protest laws. Originally designed to counter Black Lives Matter protests, these bills have been hastily repurposed after Jan, 6 while increasing dependence on police forces. Eight other states have such legislation pending.

    But as the past five years illustrate, the issue isn’t a lack of laws addressing domestic extremism. It’s a lack of will from law enforcement and inconsistent enforcement of existing law. Reinforcing the false sense that law enforcement is politically neutral by granting it even more money and power would be counterproductive to preventing a further rending of the country’s social fabric.

    During the Trump era, the animus between police forces and left-wing protesters was clear. So was law enforcement’s unwillingness to crack down on right-wing extremists while meting out harsh punishments and violence on a broad spectrum of left-wing protesters. In an analysis of 13,000 protests, the US Crisis Monitor, a nonprofit political violence analysis group, found that police were three times more likely to engage in violent tactics like beating and using gas against left-wing protesters than right-wing protesters.

    One piquant example of right-wing agitators’ skirting existing laws is the rise of the Proud Boys, a militant group with white nationalist ties founded in 2017….

    Indeed, as federal and local law enforcement agencies cracked down against racial justice protesters in the wake of George Floyd’s death, right-wing groups organized competing pro-police “Back the Blue” rallies around the country, which officers attended with pride and gratitude.

    Even in the wake of the Capitol riot, with its stark images and multiple deaths, the undeniable affinity between police and the far right in the U.S. retained its potency. The day after the storming, Chicago Fraternal Order of Police President John Cataranza — who represents 12,000 rank-and-file police officers — downplayed the violence in a radio interview, depicting the rioters as ” a bunch of pissed-off people that feel an election was stolen” and adding that their worst crime was “trespassing.” (Reminder: A police officer died of his injuries after he was bludgeoned.)

    And let’s not forget that dozens of current police officers were among the crowd that breached the Capitol or the attendees at the pro-Trump rally that preceded it….

    The fact is that those who are most likely to face prosecution under any new anti-protest laws or domestic terrorism statutes are those who are already law enforcement’s preferred targets: organizers for social justice and minorities. Likewise, to suggest that the same police forces that have willingly deputized members of the armed far-right fringe — and who have fought alongside them — will become the instruments of its dismantling overnight is more than just naiveté; it is a wanton, willful blindness to law enforcement’s place in this country’s politics.

    In lieu of a slate of new laws that would only victimize law enforcement’s traditional targets more efficiently — while leaving far-right extremism intact and thriving — we must find ways to combat the rise of the far right without resorting to a swollen, unaccountable police corps that will never be willing to address the problem that has metastasized within its own ranks. It is obvious that a mass deradicalization of the police is necessary, very much including a thinning-out of forces rife with extremists. There is also a civil necessity to mobilize communities across the country against racism, white supremacy and antidemocratic violence.

    Providing more funding and more political cover to law enforcement is to fight fire with fire. Anyone opposed to the rise of white extremism is a potential victim of the resulting inferno.

  43. says

    Just Security – “Social Media Video Evidence in Impeachment Trial: Lessons from International Tribunals”:

    The United States has never put a president on trial for a high crime as grave as incitement of insurrection. And certainly, in no prior impeachment of any individual has such a massive body of video evidence of the alleged offense existed. While this situation may be wholly unique in American history, it is not without precedent from a global perspective. Leaders of other nations who have engaged in international crimes have faced prosecutors armed with voluminous documentation, including video evidence sourced from mobile phones. Experts on how evidence is collected, documented and presented in such trials see parallels with the imminent impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump, and they believe there’s cause to rethink how social media evidence is collected and how such proceedings are carried out in future.

    3. No matter the outcome, the documentary evidence presented will shape history.

    Even if the requisite sixty-seven Senators do not vote to convict Donald Trump, the collection of evidence for his trial will reverberate through history. The Berkeley Protocols were announced on the 75th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials, at which the prosecution played an hour long film simply titled, “The Nazi Concentration Camps.” Not only did the video evidence impact the trial, it changed the way we perceive the German atrocities to this day.

    “I am hoping that Congress treats this as a civics lesson and allows us to start understanding how government functions, why it functions, and how the actions on January 6th undermine our democracy,” said Matheson. It is possible to imagine the evidence serving as the basis for an educational resource, such as the platform (described here) that the International Criminal Court used to present evidence in its case against Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, who was convicted of war crimes in Mali.

    Certainly, the video evidence will represent a curious portrait of the various forces motivating the base of the Republican party at this moment in history. The participants in the siege on the Capitol represented “a really fascinating cross section of America, and I hope some of the coverage in the future will focus on that. I mean, there was a pride flag being flown from the inaugural scaffoldings really early on, and a Trump flag flying next to these America First and quasi-fascistic flags. I think it’s just such a fascinating insight into a pretty significant section of America and a pretty significant section of the Republican party,” said Higgins.

    “Oftentimes the value of these processes is less about the final decision that’s made, because those are often steered by politics, than it is about actually correcting historical narrative, and educating a broader public about what took place relative to a particular event. The impact of something like this should go far beyond the decision. The last time we had an impeachment trial, the House came in with the best evidentiary record, a record that you cannot question in any way, shape or form and given the votes, and given the politics they could not get a conviction. But you do this for the public, you do it for the country, you do it for democracy,” said Matheson….

    More atl.

  44. blf says

    US suspends Haiti deportation flights as Biden administration tries to control Ice:

    […]
    The US has suspended deportation flights to Haiti, in the latest sign the Biden administration is attempting to assert control over the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, Ice, according to community activists and congressional sources.

    The reported halt to Haitian flights came after a night of frantic calls from community activists and congressional staffers to the office of the newly confirmed secretary of homeland security, Alejandro Mayorkas. It is unclear how long the suspension will last, and Ice did not reply to a request for comment on Friday morning.

    On taking office, Joe Biden ordered a 100-day moratorium on deportation while the system and procedures for removal of migrants and asylum seekers were subject to review. But on 26 January, a Trump-appointed Texas judge issued a stay on the moratorium being implemented, and Ice resumed — and in some cases stepped up — deportations to Africa, Haiti and Central America.

    The deportations defied guidelines laid down by the Biden team, stipulating that removals should be focused on suspected terrorists and convicted felons who were a danger to the public. Since being confirmed by the Senate, Mayorkas and his team have been seeking to rein in Ice, according to congressional sources.

    A flight due to leave for Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo was halted from taking off at the last minute on Thursday, so that the would-be deportees could be witnesses in an investigation into allegations of physical abuse by Ice agents. The cancellation and investigation mark a significant change in policy.

    […]

    The calls to Mayorkas’s team on Thursday night and the early hours of Friday are believed to have involved Guerline Jozef, the co-founder of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, an immigrant support group; Patrice Lawrence, co-director of the UndocuBlack Network; and staff from the Democratic senator Chris Van Hollen’s office.

    Jozef would not confirm the details of the discussions but said: “I haven’t slept for 96 hours. This is such a big win.

    “They were running two flights in a day in their hurry to deport as many people as possible,” she said. “We had babies as young as four or five months old. We were so disturbed that we were determined that for now, those people will be protected.”

    […]

    Ronaddled Raygun fired air traffic controllers on a poor pretense. Biden has a much better reason to fire the entirety of Ice.

  45. blf says

    From the Graunaid’s current insurrection the sequel live blog:

    Two House Republicans, Louie Gohmert of Texas and Andrew Clyde of Georgia, have been fined $5,000 each for ignoring the metal detectors set up outside the House chamber […]

    Gohmert, possibly the stooopidest alleged-person in Congress, does not surprise me. Clyde is unknown to me, and Ye Pfffft! of All Knowledge doesn’t single him out as anything especial, albeit it is worth noting he’s a McShooty McShootface shop owner, and “sued the city of Athens, Georgia over the shelter-in-place order imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which compelled his business to close.”

  46. says

    FFS.

    Arkansas lawmakers OK bill to require women seeking an abortion to call a pro-life hotline

    Arkansas officials have targeted abortion access once again, this time by utilizing mental abuse as a tactic. Lawmakers in the state voted Thursday to require women seeking abortions to call a pro-life hotline prior to undergoing the procedure. The state’s Senate approved the measure in a 28-5 vote, passing one of several abortion restrictions that have been filed in the state to date […] The House-backed measure is now on its way to Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson, whom lawmakers are confident will support the bill.

    To enforce the “Every Mom Matters Act,” the state will set up a toll-free number with information on services available for those who do not wish to have an abortion. Essentially, this initiative forces women into possibly reconsidering the decisions they made for their bodies and creates an unnecessary obstacle in abortion access. “These continuing and demeaning attempts to shame people for their personal medical decisions and block them from care are backward motions that hurt Arkansans,” Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, said in a statement.

    Despite this being a clear step backward in reproductive rights, legislators claim they are helping women by setting up the hotline. “The idea with this is that you’re empowering women in order to be able to make the choice to not have an abortion,” Republican Sen. Bob Ballinger said.

    Not only is this measure a clear ploy to restrict abortions in the state, but it will be costly to implement and maintain. According to the Department of Health, it will cost an estimated $175,000 to set up the hotline and an additional $4.8 million annually to operate it. Legislators are requiring it to be set up by 2023, with repercussions for those who do not abide by the measure.

    According to the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, doctors who perform abortions without verifying their patient has completed the required five-minute call could face a $5,000 fine. Audits of health facilities will be conducted by the state to ensure compliance. […]

  47. blf says

    SC@64, The Grauniad on that meeting, Insults and expletives turn parish council Zoom meeting into internet sensation (“Swearing, hysterics and a heroically stoic clerk transform Handforth meeting into absurdist drama”). As a bit of background, the article observes “The extraordinary outbursts followed a series of complaints about the conduct of some councillors in the village and allegations of unlawful decisions which have resulted in expenditure of public funds, according to a notice posted on the council’s website by David Brown, director of governance and compliance at Cheshire district council.”

  48. says

    A prominent judge in Washington issued a surprise order Friday freeing a New Mexico county official who is charged with breaching police lines during the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

    Otero County Commissioner and Cowboys for Trump founder Couy Griffin, 47, was arrested near the Capitol three days before President Joe Biden’s inauguration and has been in custody since that time.

    Last week, a magistrate judge in Washington ordered Griffin detained pending trial, ruling that Griffin’s history of provocative and threatening statements towards Democrats and elected officials signaled that he was unlikely to abide by conditions of release and show up for trial.

    However, after a hearing Friday, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell overturned that decision. Howell has made clear her outrage over the Jan. 6 riot and she underscored that sentiment Friday, but she said Griffin’s alleged actions did not place him among the most legally culpable for the riot.

    “In contrast to most of the brazen rioters, he was not armed and he left the Capitol grounds peacefully,” Howell said. “He was not a participant in the violent break-in at the Capitol or the marauding mob roaming the halls of the legislative branch of government on Jan. 6, and the charge he now faces reflects that fact.”

    Griffin faces a misdemeanor charge of entering a Secret Service-restricted area.

    Howell acknowledged that Griffin’s statements — including one declaring “the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat” — provoked justified anger.

    “These are all words that are deeply disturbing, especially when considered in conjunction with the defendant’s decision to return with firearms to D.C. shortly before the presidential inauguration on Jan. 20,” she said.

    “His words certainly reflect strong convictions that many in this country would consider unpatriotic, obnoxious, repugnant to the democratic process and certainly harmful to the American body politic, when he’s talking about fellow Americans,” Howell said, pausing for emphasis on the last phrase.

    The judge rejected First Amendment claims from Griffin’s lawyers that his statements should not be considered as part of the detention issue, but she said they didn’t mean he was likely to ignore the court’s orders.

    Howell also expressed concern that, given trial delays related to the pandemic, Griffin might end up spending more time awaiting trial than he would be sentenced to if found guilty in the case.

    Link

  49. blf says

    Loons in Texas dream of loosing another lopsided battle at the Alamo, Texas Republicans endorse legislation to allow vote on secession from US (Granuiad edits in {curly braces}):

    […]
    The Texas Republican party has endorsed legislation that would allow state residents to vote whether to secede from the United States.

    In a talkshow interview, the party chair, Allen West, argued that: “Texans have a right to voice their opinions on {this} critical issue.

    […]

    West is the latest Republican to come out in support of declaring Texas an independent nation. Last month, the state representative Kyle Biedermann confirmed that he will introduce the bill for a referendum as early as this week.

    “Texit,” named after the British referendum to leave the European Union, refers to the process of Texas exiting the United States to become an independent, self-governing nation.

    I presume the only people within Texas in favour of seceding are a handful of nazis in the government, a moldly collection of columns-for-hire “journalists”, and some shadowy “donors”.

    The endorsement drew intense backlash from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. Many took aim directly at Allen as party chair, continuing a slew of criticism that has been levied at him since first he took on the role in July.

    Back then, Allen was immediately criticized for changing the political organization’s slogan to We are the Storm, in what the New York Times called an “unusually visible example of the Republican party’s dalliance with QAnon”, the conspiracy theory. [✓ nazis in government …]

  50. says

    QAnon Believers Are Obsessed With Hillary Clinton. She Has Thoughts.

    New York Times link

    The mass execution cult has roots in three decades of demonization.

    A clear indication that Marjorie Taylor Greene was more than a dabbler in QAnon was her 2018 endorsement of “Frazzledrip,” one of the most grotesque tendrils of the movement’s mythology. You “have to go down a number of rabbit holes to get that far,” said Mike Rothschild, whose book about QAnon, “The Storm Is Upon Us,” comes out later this year.

    The lurid fantasy of Frazzledrip refers to an imaginary video said to show Hillary Clinton and her former aide, Huma Abedin, assaulting and disfiguring a young girl, and drinking her blood. It holds that several cops saw the video, and Clinton had them killed.

    When Greene posted a picture of Donald Trump with the mother of the slain N.Y.P.D. officer Miosotis Familia on Facebook, one of her commenters described Frazzledrip and wrote, “This was another Hillary hit.” Greene replied, “Yes Familia,” then continued, “I post things sometimes to see who knows things. Most the time people don’t. I’m glad to see your comment.”

    Contemplating Frazzledrip, it occurred to me that QAnon is the obscene apotheosis of three decades of Clinton demonization. It’s other things as well, including a repurposed version of the old anti-Semitic blood libel, which accused Jews of using the blood of Christian children in their rituals, and a cult lusting for mass public executions. According to the F.B.I., it’s a domestic terror threat.

    But QAnon is also the terminal stage of the national derangement over Clinton that began as soon as she entered public life. “It’s my belief that QAnon really took off because it was based on Hillary Clinton,” said Rothschild. “It was based specifically on something that a lot of 4chan dwellers wanted to see happen, which was Hillary Clinton arrested and sort of dragged away in chains.”

    I was curious what Clinton thinks about all this, and it turns out she’s been thinking about it a lot. “For me, it does go back to my earliest days in national politics, when it became clear to me that there was a bit of a market in trafficking in the most outlandish accusations and wild stories concerning me, my family, people that we knew, people close to us,” she told me.

    The difference is that, even if Fox News or Rush Limbaugh spread demented lies about the Clintons, there was no algorithm feeding their audience ever-sicker stuff to maximize their engagement. For most ordinary people, there were no slot machine-like dopamine hits to be had for upping the ante on what might be the greatest collective slander in American history.

    […] there was always a special venom reserved for Hillary, seen as a feminist succubus out to annihilate traditional family relations. An attendee at the 1996 Republican National Convention told the feminist writer Susan Faludi, “It’s well-established that Hillary Clinton belonged to a satanic cult, still does.” Running for Congress in 2014, Ryan Zinke, who would later become Trump’s secretary of the interior, described her as “the Antichrist.” (He later said he was joking.) Trump himself called Clinton “the Devil.”

    For Clinton, these supernatural smears are part of an old story. “This is rooted in ancient scapegoating of women, of doing everything to undermine women in the public arena, women with their own voices, women who speak up against power and the patriarchy,” she said. “This is a Salem Witch Trials line of argument against independent, outspoken, pushy women. And it began to metastasize around me.” In this sense, Frazzledrip is just a particularly disgusting version of misogynist hatred she’s always contended with.

    Nor is the claim that she’s a murderer new; it’s been an article of faith on the right ever since the 1993 suicide of Vince Foster, an aide to Bill Clinton and a close friend of Hillary’s. Recently I spoke to Preston Crow, who, when he was a graduate student in 1994, created one of the first anti-Clinton websites, where he posted about things like the “Clinton body count.” (He has since become a Democrat, and he voted for Hillary in 2016.) “Once you start following the conspiracy theories, it’s fairly similar,” he told me. “QAnon took it several steps farther.”

    Greene now claims that she no longer believes in QAnon. In a speech on Thursday, before the House voted to strip her of her committee assignments, she blamed her claims that leading Democrats deserve to die for their role in a diabolic pedophile ring on her inability to trust the mainstream media. “I was allowed to believe things that weren’t true,” she said.

    To my surprise, Clinton thought Greene’s passive account of her own radicalization wasn’t entirely absurd. “We are facing a mass addiction with the effective purveying of disinformation on social media,” Clinton said. “I don’t have one iota of sympathy for someone like her, but the algorithms, we are now understanding more than ever we could have, truly are addictive. And whatever it is in our brains for people who go down those rabbit holes, and begin to inhabit this alternative reality, they are, in effect, made to believe.”

    Clinton now thinks that the creation and promotion of this alternative reality, enabled and incentivized by the tech platforms, is, as she put it, “the primary event of our time.” Nothing about QAnon or Marjorie Taylor Greene is entirely new. Social media has just taken the dysfunction that was already in our politics, and rendered it uglier than anyone ever imagined.

  51. says

    From Josh Marshall: “QAnon is Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’”

    As the QAnon phenomenon becomes more central to critical political and public safety questions, I realize we need a new vocabulary to describe this and similar phenomena. Q is not a “conspiracy theory”. The faked moon landing was a conspiracy theory. Perhaps birtherism was a conspiracy theory, though one with similarities to QAnon because of its strong ideological valence. But Q is not a conspiracy theory. It’s a fascistic political movement which predicts and advocates mass violence against liberals (and everyone else outside its definition of true Americans) in an imminent apocalyptic political reckoning. What we call the ‘conspiracy theories’ are simply the storylines and claims that justify that outcome. They could easily be replaced by others which serve the same purpose.

    In other words – and this is still a very basic confusion – the Q phenomenon is not a factual misunderstanding that more credible news sources or prevalent fact-check columns would deflate and tame. You can even see this play out in real time in what we might call Q ‘man on the street’ interviews in which a reporter dissects or debunks some claim the Q supporter believes. The response is invariably something like, “Well, there are a bunch of other bad things I heard they did.”

    Some Q supporters clearly believe some of the movement fables. You can see this in the late 2016 story of the man who stormed the Pizza shop in DC which was a focal point of pedophilia claims in the PizzaGate conspiracy theory, which was a precursor to Q. (Most PizzaGate fables were later incorporated into Qanon.) Edgar M. Welch, the would-be mass shooter and rescuer of abused children, was clearly quite surprised to find that Comet Ping Pong was in fact just a good pizza joint, with no abused children, no dungeons, no secret headquarters of John Podesta.

    But Welch, I think, is the exception. Just as the ‘conspiracy theory’ language is inadequate and misleading we need a better way of understanding belief, particularly belief as a form of aggression. I don’t think most QAnon believers actually ‘believe’ that Hillary Clinton runs a pedophilia ring, at least not in the sense that you and I think of the word. Most of us in politics and in journalism have a rather classical and mechanistic understanding of cognition and belief. We use our mental faculties to ascertain what is true and then we believe those things that appear to be true. Or we take the word of trusted sources and believe those things. We may believe things which are not true either because we’ve been mislead or because our pre-existing biases distort our understanding of what is true. For this, good fact-check columns can help. When we say things we know are not true that’s lying. We know that’s not right. But sometimes we do it anyway.

    This is a very inadequate way of understanding the Q phenomenon and much else in contemporary politics and culture.

    I say you’re a pedophile not because I think you’re actually a pedophile but because it is an attack. Because it hurts you. In online and message board culture there are legions of users constantly attacking anyone they disagree with or don’t like as pedophiles or other horrid accusations. Presumably these people aren’t acting on some mistaken information that the people (the identities of whom they usually don’t even know) they’re attacking have sexually abused children. It’s not a misunderstanding. It’s a form of aggression. Things like the Q phenomenon are just this aggression writ large. I say you’re a pedophile because it is itself an act of aggression but also because it dehumanizes you. It’s a storyline that makes hurting you or killing you make more sense and be more exciting.

    Not surprisingly given his role in these movements, Donald Trump is a good illustration of how to think about belief in this context. We know that Trump is a scurrilous, pathological liar. But as I’ve written, Trump doesn’t believe or not believe as you or I likely do. In fact, if you could sit Trump down sedated or under some kind of truth serum and ask why he was lying about some particular claim I think he would find the question almost bewildering. Someone like Trump finds what would be helpful to his needs or claims or interest in the particular moment and then says those things. And I think he even kind of believes them because they help him. […]

    Any sports fan comes to believe that their team is absolutely the best and the rival team is definitely the worst, with all manner of chants, regalia and affirmations even though they know – from another perspective – that all of this is in fact absurd. […] The point here is not to defend Trump who is malevolent predator and degenerate liar. It is to explain that his calculus of truth, belief and advantage are quite different than what most of us are likely familiar with.

    Just how QAnon and comparable movements work is something I’m still working to get my head around. […] But calling them conspiracy theories is not only wrong in concept it seriously misleads us about what they are and how to combat them. Qanon is a violent terroristic political movement with strong fascistic facets the upshot of which, in every storyline, is a final violent reckoning in which Trump’s political enemies are rounded up and murdered. That’s what it’s about. The fables are just getting people primed and ready for that moment.

    https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/qanon-is-not-a-conspiracy-theory

  52. says

    Fleeing the sinking ship:

    […] In the week from Jan. 6 through Jan. 12, Colorado Public Radio found that about 4,600 Republicans changed their party status in the state. “All told, the Colorado GOP lost about a half a percent of its registered voters in the week after the riot,” writes NPR. The same trend is occurring nationwide, according to a variety of news outlets that have documented the changes since the November election. Here’s a brief rundown:

    Arizona: 7,500 defections

    California: 33,300 defections

    Connecticut: 6,500 defections

    North Carolina: 6,000 defections

    Pennsylvania: 10,000 defections

    Utah: 7,600 defections

    Many of those newly switched voters abandoned the GOP because they were explicitly rejecting a party that continues to embrace Donald Trump and his violent brand of politics. But the GOP also suffered some losses among Trump supporters who feel the party wasn’t sufficiently loyal to him following the siege and didn’t deliver on overturning the election. […]

  53. says

    Humor/satire from Andy Borowitz:

    After being stripped of her committee assignments, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has created a committee of her own, the House Committee on Semitic Aerospace Weaponry.

    Greene said that such a committee was sorely needed, given that “Semitic aerospace weaponry is the second-biggest threat facing this country, right after plane crashes caused by the Clintons.”

    “And it’s going to be way better than some dumb old committee about education,” she added.

    The Georgia Republican said that she was not at all discouraged that Democrats had shown no interest in joining her committee, despite her advertising on Facebook that there would be a generous array of snacks at every meeting.

    “Of course, it’s obvious why Democrats don’t care about snacks,” she said. “Hello? Cannibals?”

    New Yorker link

  54. blf says

    From the Gruaniad’s current insurrection the sequel live blog:

    When Trump was booted from Twitter and Facebook for spreading disinformation about election fraud that never occurred, many people expected him to join his supporters on Parler […]. A new report from BuzzFeed details why the former president [sic] never showed up — he was unable to secure a stake in the company.

    […]

    Former Trump campaign manager, Brad Parscale, said Trump was never directly involved in the discussions, but sources told BuzzFeed News that the Trump Organization was offered a 40% stake in the company. In exchange, the former president [sic] would have to use Parler exclusively, posting all content there at least 4 hours before he shared it elsewhere.

    The deal, which was never finalized but was discussed while Trump was still in office, may land him in more legal hot water.

    Kathleen Clark, a law professor at the Washington University in St Louis, said that, had the deal gone through while Trump was still in office, both Parler and the president [sic] could have been in violation of anti-bribery laws. Because the former president [sic] often used his Twitter and Facebook accounts to make official communications — for example, announcing the firings of government officials — seeking to gain something in exchange for making posts exclusive to another platform could be illegal.

    “I think it would have actually violated the bribery statute in that he would have been offered something of value — a stake in this company — in exchange for influencing an official act — the act of where to publish his official comments,” Clark said.

    I’m reminded of the claim the reason hair furor ran in the first place in the 2016 was as publicity for a proposed hair furor channel / show / network. The above could be construed as suggesting he tried to turn Parler into that hair furor branded scam.

  55. says

    Humor/satire from The New Yorker: ” The Biggest Changes to the White House Under President Joe Biden”

    Marine posted outside Oval Office no longer required to clutch Ivanka Trump-brand handbag.

    Carnivorous flowers uprooted from White House Rose Garden.

    All American flags on premises provided with round-the-clock access to trauma counsellor.

    No more twenty-dollar-per-night Wi-Fi charge for guests.

    Security doorbell camera now aimed outside the house.

    […] Gigantic Emanuel Leutze painting “Trump Crossing the River Styx” removed and burned.

    […] KFC stains professionally removed from Lincoln Bedroom walls.

    That couch on the second floor? The Q Shaman has been permanently banned from it.

    “World’s No. 1 President” crystal goblets gone.

    The Pardon Xpress Lane now an actual White House entrance.

    Crying Room for staff converted into sunny, open-air day-care space.

    Taco Bell Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Saturdays, and oftentimes Thursdays taken off White House calendar.

    Basement portal to Hell caulked over.

    “Flynnocent”-monogrammed paper napkins replaced with plain cloth variety.

    […] Frames now filled with actual family photos and not the generic ones they came with.

    […] Chief usher no longer forced to wear horned helmet.

    All copper wiring pawned by Eric and Don, Jr., has been replaced.

    “applaud!” signs removed from media briefing room.

    Anti-harassment training videos no longer to include graphic sex scenes.

    Dispensers in lavatories to once again dispense soap and not hair dye.

    Security code required for entry upgraded from “I know Trump from Parler, O.K.?”

    A.T.M.s to dispense cash and not Bitcoin.

    […] David Koch marble mausoleum dismantled.

    Furniture no longer on layaway plan.

    Continental breakfast now free!

    Secret Service nickname for the President no longer contains a curse word.

    Gaudy gold stair-lift chair replaced with less garish mahogany stair-lift chair.

    Oval Office no longer referred to in memos as Fake Circle Office.

    Staff to once again use their real names instead of numbers.

    Shock collars removed from around necks of members of White House press corps.

    Sean Spicer no longer allowed to roam the grounds in jester costume.

    Bumper guards taken off basement-bowling-alley gutters.

    […] New bench installed in the Rose Garden, where Republican visitors can rest and try to remember why they were so worked up about Hunter Biden.

    […] Household staff no longer paid in pieces of 2016-electoral-map jigsaw puzzle.

    Exsanguinated under-secretary returned to next of kin after being removed from Stephen Miller’s office.

    Mural prominently featuring nuclear-launch codes scrubbed from Oval Office reception area.

    Top-secret security clearance revoked from the Oak Ridge Boys.

    […] Biweekly sweeps of White House ventilation system instituted, to remove any of Stephen Miller’s remaining egg sacs.

    […] Trump’s high scores on Galaga erased.

    Everywhere you go, the faint aroma of Fixodent piped in.

    […] Cords plugged back into phones in Oval Office.

    White House executive chef no longer needs to worry about keeping “tantrum snacks” in stock.

    […] White House tours no longer include President Trump’s Hall of Disgusting Losers & Haters.

    Stately bronze bust of James Woods retouched so that it sort of passes for Woodrow Wilson.

    Out of an abundance of caution, Mike Pompeo’s personal bathroom completely encased in concrete.

    Mayor McCheese removed from official White House china.

    New Yorker link

  56. blf says

    Lynna@75, quotes “Carnivorous flowers uprooted from White House Rose Garden.”

    Ok, ok, I admit it, I totally lost it at that point… Good thing I’d put the coffee down and had swallowed the mouthful when I read it, or I’d be cleaning ballistic coffee shards from the outside wall of the building across the street…

  57. blf says

    An interesting discussion I’m listening to as I type, What AOC Taught Us about Trauma (video): “This week Dana Schwartz and Kiran Deol join Erin Ryan and Alyssa Mastromonaco to discuss AOC’s heartbreaking instagram live documenting her story and trauma from the Capitol attack. They talk about how her play-by-play was told from a narrative perspective that’s usually omitted, and how Republicans like Ted Cruz are trying to move on and place the blame on her.”

  58. blf says

    Follow-up to @417(previous page), from the Grauniad’s current insurrection sequel live blog:

    A hearing has been scheduled to decide whether Kyle Rittenhouse […] should be rearrested or have his bond increased $200,000 after he neglected to inform authorities of a change in address.

    […] The teen’s attorneys argue he transferred to an undisclosed safe house after receiving threats.

    Prosecutors also said Rittenhouse […] was also spotted last month at a bar in Wisconsin sporting a shirt that read Free as Fuck while he posed for photos with members of the far-right and self-described male western chauvinist group the Proud Boys, and flashed white power hand signs [whilst living in a safe house due to threats (FTL eyerolling) –blf].

  59. says

    ABC – “Congressional investigators probe videos of Trump associates’ actions ahead of Capitol riot”:

    Congressional investigators preparing for former President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial are zeroing in on the actions of the president and his associates around the insurrection at the Capitol, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.

    The House impeachment managers and their team of lawyers are examining materials, including videos, photos and social media posts, for possible links between individuals close to Trump and some involved in the riot at the Capitol, a source with knowledge of the House impeachment managers’ investigation told ABC News.

    They include a newly surfaced video first reported by ABC News showing longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone in Washington, D.C., the morning of Jan. 6. In the video, Stone is flanked by members of the Oath Keepers militia group just hours before the deadly Capitol riots — including one man who appeared to later have participated in the Capitol assault, according to online researchers.

    “So, hopefully we have this today, right?” one supporter asks Stone in the video. “We shall see,” Stone replies. Stone has maintained that he played “no role whatsoever in the Jan. 6 events” and has repeatedly said that he “never left the site of my hotel until leaving for Dulles Airport” that afternoon.

    Examining the actions of Trump, his aides and allies before and during the riot could help House impeachment managers make their case that the 45th president’s comments to supporters at a Jan. 6 rally outside the White House were the culmination of a weekslong effort to overturn the election results. It could also shed light on the actions of those around Trump and whether they could have been more familiar with the riot — and some of those who participated in it — than initially disclosed.

    Democrats also are working to piece together what Trump did behind closed doors the day of the insurrection, sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.

    Impeachment investigators are looking into the actions of former senior staffers to Trump, including former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, and what action they may or may not have taken related to the Capitol attack, the sources said.

    ABC News previously reported that when Trump returned to the White House, he moved between the private dining room and the Oval Office, watching the events play out in real time as a small group of advisers, including Meadows, urged the president to condemn the violence….

    It might be the case that Stone “has repeatedly said that he ‘never left the site of my hotel until leaving for Dulles Airport’ that afternoon,” but his earlier story was that he didn’t leave his room that day:

    “Since I never left my hotel room at all on January 6, and since I was not at the Capitol and know nothing about the events there, I urge you to be very, very careful,” he wrote to VICE News in a text message.

  60. blf says

    Wisconsin Vaccine Saboteur Steven Brandenburg Is a Flat-Earther, FBI Document Reveals:

    […]
    The Wisconsin pharmacist who intentionally sabotaged hundreds of doses of the Moderna coronavirus vaccine because he thought COVID-19 was a hoax, also believes the earth is flat and the sky is actually a shield put up by the Government to prevent individuals from seeing God.

    That’s according to a newly-unsealed FBI search warrant application [… that] reveals Brandenburg’s delusions went far beyond doubting the reality of the coronavirus. Not only did Brandenburg insist the microchipped vaccine would turn off people’s birth control and make others infertile, he was convinced that the physical world around him was not what it seemed […]

    According to divorce records […], Brandenburg’s wife Gretchen told a judge that her husband was storing bulk food and guns in multiple rental units, fearing that the government was planning attacks on the electrical grid and the nation’s computer networks. She said she was so scared for her safety, and that of her children’s, that she left town.

    […]

    The mildly deranged penguin has no memory of talking to his guy, and she points out neither cheese nor peas are mentioned…

  61. says

    Mehdi Hasan:

    My quick video explainer, rant, about #farmersprotest, India, Modi, Trump, and the rise of authoritarianism – and, why it should matter to all of us!

    With special thanks to @rihanna and @GretaThunberg.

    Do please watch and share:…

  62. says

    David Allen Green – “Did Jackie Weaver have the authority? – the law and policy of that Handforth Parish Council meeting”:

    …And the excluded chair and the disruptive councillors can hardly complain about their exclusions on the basis of non-compliance with the Standing Orders if, as they maintained, the committee meeting was illegitimate to begin with.

    For on their own version of events, there was no valid committee meeting even taking place….

    Yes! This is just what I was thinking!

  63. blf says

    More people now vaccinated against Covid-19 than infected worldwide, data shows:

    […]
    A total of 104.9 million vaccine doses have been administered, according to University of Oxford-based Our World in Data and the latest data on Wednesday from the US-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The total vaccinated now exceeds the 104.1 million Covid-19 cases of infection in a Reuters global tracker.

    Arrggghhhh!!!!! Doses ≠ people. With (several of) the currently-approved vaccines, it’s 2 doses (2 jabs) before the person is fully vaccinated.

    Covid-19 infections are still rising in 44 countries and the virus has killed at least 2.26 million people globally, according to the Reuters tracker. […]

    Duke University’s Global Health Innovation Center confirms global purchases of 7.7 billion doses with another 5 billion doses under negotiation or reserved as optional expansions of existing deals.

    Israel leads the world, having administered enough vaccine doses for 28% of its population, assuming every person needs two doses, according to Our World in Data. Vaccinations in the Palestinian territories have only just begun, however, after Israel delivered a first batch of 2,000 vaccine doses to the Palestinian Authority on Monday.

    […]

    I have no idea how many people have received a full two-dose regime, how many are awaiting their second jab, and hence how many are unvaccinated. France24’s reporting seems to muddle the counting (I have not checked the original Reuters and AFP reports).

    Bloomberg, More Than 124 Million Shots Given: Covid-19 Tracker provides a more informed breakdown, both for the States (by state) and other countries. (The headline totals differ because, in part, the articles are from different days.)

    One annoying thing — which I’ve been suspecting based on the statistics from France’s track-and-trace app — is the rate of vaccination in France is appallingly slow. The States is now administrating c.1.3 million jabs per day; in contrast, France’s total number of jabs since vaccinations started over a month ago is just c.1.7 million jabs (the current rate is c.85,000 jabs a day).

  64. blf says

    To be Trump, or not: what Shakespeare tells us about the last five years:

    […]
    “While maintaining his career as the most-produced playwright in the world, he [Shakespeare] is also moonlighting as the most-cited provider of metaphors for the Trump era — and particularly its denouement,” Jesse Green, the chief theater critic of the New York Times, observed last month. “Hardly a thumb-sucking political analysis goes by without allusion to one of the 37 canonical plays, however limited or far-fetched the comparison may be.”

    […] Jeffrey Wilson, a Harvard academic, is the author of Shakespeare and Trump, published last year. The book’s cover features its title emblazoned on a red cap, in lieu of the words “Make America great again”, beneath a pair of donkey’s ears.

    “The thesis of the book is tragedy but we’ve got a little bit of comedy in there too,” Wilson says. “So the cover alludes to Shakespeare’s character Bottom, who’s this kind of huckster blowhard who gets his head turned into a donkey to symbolise the stupidity. Plus, Bottom’s just obsessed with building a wall in A Midsummer Night’s Dream.”

    Which other characters parallel Trump? “There’s going to be Julius Caesar, who thinks he’s a god over people, not one of them. There’s going to be Richard III, this power-hungry criminal whose clownishness seduces supporters. There’s going to be Macbeth, whose thirst for power is wrapped up in his fragile masculinity.

    “There’s going to be Henry VI, this child king whose weak leadership creates this fractious counsellor infighting all around him. There’s going to be Angelo in Measure for Measure, a self-declared law-and-order guy who is himself a criminal. And there’s going to be King Lear, who so completely binds the personal and the political that the collapse of his government is also the collapse of his family.”

    […]

    Steve Bannon […] was previously a banker, media executive and Hollywood producer who in the 1990s co-wrote two Shakespearean adaptations: a Titus Andronicus set in space, complete with ectoplasmic sex, and a hip-hop Coriolanus, based in South-Central LA.

    The screenplays are not publicly available but Wilson tracked them down — and found an insidious racism. He writes: “Specifically, Bannon’s Coriolanus suggests that African Americans will kill themselves off through Black-on-Black crime, while his Andronicus tells the story of a ‘noble race’ eliminating its cultural enemies on the way to securing political power.”

    Wilson adds: “NowThis did a table read of Coriolanus and actors were just sprinting to get through the lines. One of them said, ‘It sounds like he’s never met a Black person in his life.’”

    […]

    “There’s a database that collects all of Donald Trump’s campaign speeches,” Wilson says, “and there’s only one hit when you search for the name Shakespeare. It comes when Trump is describing a campaign speech that Ted Cruz made and Cruz had been speaking very eloquently from Trump’s perspective and so Trump said something to the effect of Ted Cruz is a Shakespeare.

    “So Ted Cruz is Donald Trump’s image of the ideal of linguistic eloquence. Ted Cruz: not of an age, but for all time.”

  65. says

    Follow-up to comment 78.

    Michael Beschloss:

    Seventeen days earlier, and Lou Dobbs might have scored a Presidential Medal of Freedom.

    George Takei:

    Whenever I’m having a tough day, I will think about yesterday, when Lou Dobbs had a much worse day, and it will make everything seem a bit better.

    George Conway:

    Ok here’s a limerick

    There once was a man named Lou
    Who said some things that weren’t true
    So the people he slimed
    Got some lawyers and primed
    A lawsuit that’ll make him turn blue

  66. says

    All the batshit bonkers groups flocking together?

    […] Militia groups in Georgia, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports, are forming alliances with an array of other Trump-supporting far-right organizations, including the QAnon groups aligned with Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. It reflects a much broader trend in the post-Trump world of the radical right in which what used to be distinct movements with widely differing sets of beliefs are commingling and coalescing into a singular far-right insurgency against liberal democracy.

    The goal of the Georgia groups, according to Justin Thayer of the Georgia III% Martyrs, is to advocate for the state’s secession from the United States. He says the final straw was the arrests of people who were involved in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

    “The way patriots are now being hunted down and arrested by fellow men and women who have taken the same oath has disheartened any faith I had in the redemption or reformation of the USA as one entity,” Thayer told the Journal-Constitution.

    Thayer’s group have now allied themselves with other “Three Percenter” militias, mainly the American Brotherhood of Patriots and American Patriots USA (APUSA), headed by Chester Doles, a Dahlonega man with a background in neo-Nazi hate groups. Thayer foresees a need for Georgians to leave the union because of what he calls “the collapse of the American experiment.”

    Doles also told the paper he had given up on democracy: “Things are different now. Everything has changed. We’ve seen our last Republican president in American history. The ballot box—we tried as hard as we could try. It’s not working.”

    Amy Iandiorio, an Anti-Defamation League researcher who has been monitoring these groups’ online activities, told the Journal-Constitution that a “shared victimhood narrative” around Trump’s defeat at the hands of Joe Biden had fostered an environment that encouraged “tactical” alliances among normally disparate groups.

    […] After the Jan. 6 insurrection there has been some breakdown in intergroup relations and some internecine quarreling, mostly as a result of fallout from both the law enforcement crackdown on participants and the sudden deplatforming of far-right extremists from social media sites that followed the attack on the Capitol. This is not surprising since historically the American radical right has gone through periods of shakeup following high-profile public events involving them, such as the 1996 Oklahoma City bombing or the 2017 riots in Charlottesville, Virginia.

    But as Burghart observes, these periods mostly involve reshaping of the movement to fit new conditions on the ground. “The situation inside the Proud Boys right now captures many different movement dynamics,” he told Daily Kos. “There is increased law enforcement scrutiny and multiple arrests on serious charges related to the Capitol insurrection. There are chapters in Indiana and Oklahoma that split from the national organization, largely because of that scrutiny (and the revelation that the group’s leader was an informant). Most importantly, however, is that there is a faction trying to pull the group in a more explicitly white nationalist direction. Despite all the internal chaos, the Proud Boys are still looking to recruit disaffected Qanon believers.”

    […] Burghart sees three major issues likely to bond the various sectors of the radical right during this period of adjustment:

    Look for nativism to be the glue that binds together mainstreamers and armed insurrectionists during the first years of the Biden administration.

    Opposition to COVID-19 health restrictions, widespread distribution of the vaccine, and spending to fight the virus can become a flashpoint for the far right, as recent confrontations in Los Angeles, California, and Vancouver, Washington, have demonstrated. Expect more confrontations.

    Attacking Black Lives Matter/antifascists has been a vital part of the far-right playbook for some time. It provides a common racialized enemy and their rationalization for street violence.

    Regardless of how it all takes shape, we can expect that the insurgency the Biden-Harris administration will be facing will be relentlessly conspiracist, with those conspiracy theories providing “justification” for the various kinds of violence they will unleash: Proud Boys-style street violence with armed vigilante militias participating as well, and various acts of domestic terrorism—both so-called “lone wolf” violence by radicalized individuals as well as organized small-cell attacks of trained paramilitary groups, probably on both government and media targets. […]

    Link

  67. says

    Matt Gaetz takes more steps to prove that he is a total dunderhead:

    Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida Man), long a leading advocate of governance via trolling, is just all kinds of disappointed that in this great American nation of our American Republic, he couldn’t even get the Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee to agree to a simple request for bipartisan unity and love of country by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Gaetz took to the Twitters this week — several times Thursday, and then endlessly since — to complain about just what a terrible shame it is that Democrats can’t be bothered to take time to say they love America. It’s virtually the only thing his most recent million or so tweets and retweets have been about (as of Friday afternoon), apart from a couple of tweets promoting his appearances on Fox News — where he also talked about the Pledge, of course. He’s so very intent on making it a thing!

    The committee chair, Jerry Nadler (D-New York), quickly shot down Gaetz’s suggestion because, he noted, the House as a body starts the day with the pledge, and he didn’t see any reason to recite it twice a day, which prompted Gaetz to accuse Nadler, naturally enough, of insufficiently loving America, because he’d adopted “the ‘I gave at the office’ version of patriotism.” So now we can look forward to a few days of very important bloviating, […]

    Isn’t it all just wonderfully stupid and normal to be back on familiar territory, with rightwing media asking, very very seriously, why Democrats object to taking 15 seconds to show they love America? […] we somehow got through most of the 20th century — including surviving the Great Depression, beating the Nazis in WWII, and passing the Civil and Voting Rights Acts — without anyone knowing that members of the House love their country and its flag.

    Joseph Heller marked the momentous debate by publishing, without any additional comment, an excerpt from Catch-22 about the Glorious Loyalty Oath Crusade as an op-ed in the New York Times.

    Without realizing how it had come about, the combat men in the squadron discovered themselves dominated by the administrators appointed to serve them. They were bullied, insulted, harassed and shoved about all day long by one after the other. When they voiced objection, Captain Black replied that people who were loyal would not mind signing all the loyalty oaths they had to. To anyone who questioned the effectiveness of the loyalty oaths, he replied that people who really did owe allegiance to their country would be proud to pledge it as often as he forced them to. And to anyone who questioned the morality, he replied that ”The Star-Spangled Banner” was the greatest piece of music ever composed. The more loyalty oaths a person signed, the more loyal he was. […]

    ”The important thing is to keep them pledging,” he explained to his cohorts. ”It doesn’t matter whether they mean it or not. That’s why they make little kids pledge allegiance even before they know what ‘pledge’ and ‘allegiance’ mean.”

    Also too, the Daily Caller got some audio of some Democrats making fun of Gaetz’s performative patriotism, which just proves that Dems really don’t love this great country and will mock even the flag that our forefathers fought and died for!!!!! In the recording, Rep. Steve Cohen and some other, unidentified Dems can be heard joking — JOKING! — about Gaetz’s love for the country that has given them so much, not that they appreciate it. After an unnamed staffer reminds members on the Zoom call that their discussion is on live mics, Cohen says,

    Okay, so somebody, I missed a little bit of what we just had, uh uh I wake up in the morning and I pledge allegiance to the flag, I go outside regardless of the weather, I got my flag up by my house and I pledge allegiance. Then I get on my knees and I pray. If I do that, if I, do I have to, am I supposed to do it again and how many times a day should I do that?

    Another voice pops in: “I think you should do it at least every hour.” What shocking sacrilege! Cohen jokingly asks if Gaetz wanted them to pray, too, or just the pledge, then mocks the Sacred Pledge yet again: “I remember in the first grade we had something like this.”

    That prompted another Dem to say, “I remember too, I remember on Fridays at 10 o’clock we ducked below our desks in the event of a nuclear bomb.” […]

    Link

  68. says

    Oh no.

    Supreme Court says California worship restrictions violate religious rights.

    Washington Post link

    The Supreme Court’s order late Friday night that California must allow churches to resume indoor worship services reveals a conservative majority that’s determined to guard religious rights and is more than willing to second-guess state health officials, even during a pandemic.

    Under restrictions imposed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), almost all of the state was under an order to ban indoor religious services as officials battle the raging coronavirus pandemic. It is the nation’s most severe restriction, and the court said in an unsigned opinion that it violates the Constitution.

    Instead, the justices imposed their own rule: The state must allow indoor services but may limit attendance at 25 percent capacity. The court left in place — for now — a ban on singing and chanting at those events, activities the state said were particularly risky for spreading the coronavirus.

    The court’s action was badly fractured. Five of the nine justices wrote to explain their reasoning, including Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who issued her first signed opinion.

    But the direction of the court is clear: The conservative justices now in control are highly suspicious of state restrictions on the constitutionally protected right to worship, even as some officials contend that those are the events — people from different families gathering together for an extended period indoors while singing and chanting — most likely to spread the virus.

    Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, writing for himself and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., said the court last fall made it clear that states may not enact looser regulations for businesses and other activities than for houses of worship.

    But “once more, we appear to have a state playing favorites during a pandemic, expending considerable effort to protect lucrative industries (casinos in Nevada; movie studios in California) while denying similar largesse to its faithful,” Gorsuch wrote.

    He added: “If Hollywood may host a studio audience or film a singing competition while not a single soul may enter California’s churches, synagogues, and mosques, something has gone seriously awry.”

    Precautions such as required negative COVID tests, etc. have been applied to most “Hollywood” ventures, but have not been applied to those attending church services.

    Justice Elena Kagan answered for her colleagues on the left, Justices Stephen G. Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, in a sharply worded dissent.

    “Justices of this Court are not scientists,” Kagan began, accusing her colleagues of practicing “armchair epidemiology.”

    She implied hypocrisy: The Supreme Court itself has been closed for official business for nearly a year, and the justices conduct oral arguments and their private conferences by phone rather than in person because of the pandemic.

    Although the court displaces the advice of experts, she wrote, “if this decision causes suffering, we will not pay. Our marble halls are now closed to the public, and our life tenure forever insulates us from responsibility for our errors. That would seem good reason to avoid disrupting a state’s pandemic response.” […]

    More at the link.

    […] Americans United for Separation of Church and State President Rachel Laser said the court was adopting a “radical definition” of religious liberty.

    “The Supreme Court has misconstrued religious freedom to mean religious privilege and placed the health of the American people in jeopardy,” she said in a statement. […]

  69. says

    Just some of the bogus claims about Smartmatic and Dominion that were made by various rightwing doofuses, including Rudy Giuliani and Fox News hosts:

    […] What Rudy Giuliani has said
    “They were founded as a company to fix elections. They have a terrible record and they are extremely hackable.” (Nov. 13, Fox Business)

    “They [committed fraud] absolutely in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Republicans were shut out from enough of the county so they could accomplish what Smartmatic wanted to do. And what you — that pattern that they have there, we have evidence that that’s the same pattern Smartmatic used in other elections in which they were disqualified. In other words, this is their pattern of activity.” (Nov. 15, Fox News — Maria Bartiromo’s show)

    “It’s Smartmatic, which is a company that was founded in 2005 in Venezuela for the specific purpose of fixing elections. That’s their expertise: how to fix elections.” (Nov. 18, Fox Business — Lou Dobbs’s show)

    On Smartmatic (Nov. 15, Fox News — Bartiromo’s show):
    BARTIROMO: One source says that the key point to understand is that the Smartmatic system has a back door … that allows the votes to be mirrored and monitored, allowing an intervening party a real-time understanding of how many votes will be needed to gain an electoral advantage. Are you saying the states that use that software did that?

    GIULIANI: I can prove that they did it in Michigan. I can prove it with witnesses. We are investigating the rest. … Now, they didn’t do it everywhere. They did it in big cities where they have corrupt machines that will protect them.

    “They were being notified by Smartmatic in Frankfurt, [Germany], that Biden was way behind and they better come up with a lot more ballots.” (Nov. 19, Fox News — Sean Hannity’s show)

    “And President Trump won by not just hundreds of thousands of votes, but by millions of votes — that were shifted by this software that was designed expressly for that purpose. We have sworn witness testimony of why the software was designed. It was designed to rig elections. … It was exported internationally for profit by the people that are behind Smartmatic and Dominion. They did this on purpose. It was calculated. They have done it before.” (Nov. 15, Fox News — Bartiromo’s show)

    “We’ve detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable and aligned with these problems in other states that think they have valid systems, but the people who bought the Dominion system for sure knew exactly what they were getting.” (Nov. 15, Fox News — Bartiromo’s show)

    “We now have reams and reams of actual documents from Smartmatic and Dominion, including evidence that they planned and executed all of this. … We have evidence of how they flip the votes, how it was designed to flip the votes.” (Dec. 10, Fox Business — Dobbs’s show)

    What Sidney Powell has said
    “It’s the Smartmatic and Dominion systems that were built to do this very thing, for changing the results of elections.” (Nov. 16, Mark Levin’s radio show)

    “The software itself was created with so many variables and so many back doors that can be hooked up to the Internet or a thumb drive stuck in it or whatever. But one of its most characteristic features is its ability to flip votes. It can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. … And that’s what caused them to have to shut down in the states they shut down in.” (Nov. 18, Fox Business — Dobbs’s show)

    “People can admittedly go in and change whatever they want. They can set the ratio of votes from one thing to another. They can say that a Biden vote counts as 1.25, and a Trump vote counts as 0.75, and those may be the numbers that were actually used here. It’s not just the swing states that were affected; the algorithm was likely run across the country to affect the entire election.” (Nov. 19 news conference at the RNC)

    “We’re talking about the alteration and changes and millions of votes, some being dumped that were for President Trump, some being flipped that were for President Trump, computers being overwritten to ignore signatures — all kinds of different means of manipulating the Dominion and Smartmatic software, that, of course, we would not expect Dominion or Smartmatic to admit.” (Nov. 14, Fox News — Jeanine Pirro’s show)

    What Lou Dobbs has said
    “I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this 2020 election for president of the United States. The circumstances and events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in Venezuela.” (Nov. 18, Fox Business)

    “And this president is demonstrating, once again, he is the wrong guy to cross — the wrong guy to think you can overthrow, upend and somehow stop with a vicious campaign, whether it’s verbal, whether its physical, whether it is what we have seen here: a cyberattack on our election, those voting machines and software.” (Nov. 21, Fox News — “Watters World”)

    […] What One America News has said
    “Election systems across the country are found to have deleted millions of votes cast for President Trump. According to an unaudited analysis of data obtained from Edison Research, states using Dominion Voting Systems may have switched as many as 435,000 votes from President Trump to Joe Biden, and the author also finds another 2.7 million Trump votes appear to have been deleted by Dominion, including almost 1 million truckloads in Pennsylvania alone.” (Lilia Fifield, Nov. 12) […]

    Washington Post link

    More at the link, including what Mike Lindell said, what Jeanine Pirro said, and what Maria Bartiromo said.

    All of the false claims have been debunked dozens of times. Multi-million dollar lawsuits have been filed against the liars (sometimes the lawsuits are for more than a billion dollars in damages). You can see that Smartmatic and Dominion have a good case. The lying dunderheads destroyed their businesses.

    More lawsuits may be forthcoming:

    […] Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel recently acknowledged that, during a particularly far-flung news conference held by Giuliani and then-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell at the RNC, she was “concerned it was happening in my building” and thought about “what is the liability of the RNC if these allegations are made and unfounded?”

    […] Along with Smartmatic suing Fox and its three hosts, both it and Dominion are suing Giuliani and Powell. And Dominion has signaled its legal action could expand significantly. […]

  70. says

    Re blf’s #87 – I haven’t read the book mentioned in the post, but I did read Stephen Greenblatt’s 2018 Tyrant: Shakespeare on Politics:

    Examining the psyche—and psychoses—of the likes of Richard III, Macbeth, Lear, and Coriolanus, Greenblatt illuminates the ways in which William Shakespeare delved into the lust for absolute power and the disasters visited upon the societies over which these characters rule. Tyrant shows that Shakespeare’s work remains vitally relevant today, not least in its probing of the unquenchable, narcissistic appetites of demagogues and the self-destructive willingness of collaborators who indulge their appetites.

    Thought it was pretty insightful.

  71. says

    A few podcasts:

    Mad in America – “Fascist Subjectivity and the Subhuman: An Interview with Critical Psychologist Thomas Teo.”

    QAnon Anonymous – “Episode 128: From Anonymous to QAnon feat Dale Beran, Matt Alt, Fredrick Brennan & Fuxnet”:

    The story of how “otakus” in 1980s Japan connect to the far-right conspiracy known as QAnon. How the alt right and the Capitol Riots are traceable to anonymous imageboards started by teenagers to trade anime. How 4chan birthed a group of hacktivists known as Anonymous and law enforcement destroyed it. And how social media companies lined their pockets while the credulous media were taken for a ride by organized trolls.

    Know Your Enemy – “Panic! In America (w/ the You’re Wrong About podcast)”:

    Matt and Sam are joined by special guests Sarah Marshall and Michael Hobbes of the You’re Wrong About podcast to discuss moral panics—from tales of rampant Satanism in the late 1970s to the Stranger Danger wave in the 1980s and beyond—and their role in the rise of rightwing politics in America. What do such “Save the Children” stories tell us about the way the conservative mind conceives of morality and power? What do they tell us about American culture and politics? It all builds to a discussion of QAnon and both the promise and problems with empathy.

  72. says

    Two more podcasts:

    Stay Tuned – “Trial 2 for Individual 1 (with Daniel Goldman and Adam Schiff)”:

    On this week’s episode of Stay Tuned, “Trial 2 for Individual 1,” Preet answers listener questions about the Trump legal team’s impeachment brief, the possibility of the Manhattan District Attorney prosecuting Steve Bannon, and Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny’s powerful speech upon receiving his prison sentence.

    Then, Preet is joined by Congressman Adam Schiff and Dan Goldman to discuss the upcoming Senate impeachment trial of former president Donald Trump….

    (I didn’t know the House had rehired Barry Berke and Joshua Matz for this trial. That’s good news.)

    Our Hen House – “Episode 578: Justice for All, Including Animals, ft Senator Jabari Brisport”:

    This week, we have such a powerhouse interview! Newly elected New York State Senator Jabari Brisport joins us to explain how he successfully showcased his strong support for animal rights and veganism (yup!) while running for election. In fact, he points out, it actually created a platform for discussing all of the social justice issues he is passionate about. He shares his thoughts on why people want to pit human rights against animal rights, and how and why they so often fail to realize that animal agriculture deeply harms marginalized communities. Perhaps best of all, Senator Brisport tells us why he believes we are at a watershed moment — older mindsets are shifting fast, and we are on the cusp of making real progress for both human and non-human animals.

    Senator Brisport is a third-generation Caribbean-American Brooklynite who represents New York’s District 25 in the state senate. His experiences as a Black LGBTQ+ man, socialist, union member, child of an immigrant father, and a former public school teacher have shaped his drive to make his community more just and equitable. As a newly elected state senator and passionate vegan, he intends to use his platform to advocate for rights, dignity, and protection by the law for all living beings and create a state where humans and animals can safely coexist without exploitation and abuse.

    “Whenever we don’t fight for the most marginalized, we end up harming ourselves.”
    – Senator Jabari Brisport…

    The (super interesting) interview proper begins around 10 minutes in. I liked the “Rising Anxieties” segment at the end.

  73. says

    Guardian – “Myanmar: tens of thousands protest against coup despite internet blackout”:

    Tens of thousands of people took to the streets in Myanmar on Saturday in the first major demonstration since the military seized power, despite a nationwide internet blackout imposed to stifle dissent.

    In the main city Yangon, protesters chanted “down with the military dictatorship” and carried images of the ousted leaders Aung San Suu Kyi and Win Myint, whose party won a landslide election in November. The military detained both in raids early on Monday morning and they have not been seen in public since.

    “Tell the world what has happened here,” one of the protesters said. “The world needs to know.”

    The military shut down the internet across the country in an attempt to stop the protests. The NetBlocks Internet Observatory reported that connectivity had fallen to 16% of ordinary levels by early afternoon. The military had already blocked Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

    Myanmar’s military has shown that it believes it can “shut the world out and do whatever it wants,” said Phil Robertson, the deputy director of Human Rights Watch’s Asia division.

    “They’re going to pull down the shutters and intimidate, arrest and abuse everybody who is daring to speak up. The question is how long people are able to do this and whether there will be any splits in ranks within the police or the military.”

    The state-run broadcaster MRTV played scenes praising the military all day on Saturday, according to Reuters.

    Despite the internet blackout, several thousand demonstrators gathered near Yangon University. Many wore red headbands, the colour of the National League for Democracy, and raised their hands in a three-finger salute, a gesture also used by Thai pro-democracy protesters which symbolises resistance.

    “I always disliked the military but now I’m absolutely disgusted by them,” Maea, 30, said.

    Lines of riot police blocked nearby roads, and two water cannon trucks were parked nearby. Some protesters later dispersed, but others remained at the scene. According to Agence France-Presse, as of early evening, no clashes had occurred.

    At least two other groups of demonstrators marched through other parts of Myanmar’s main city, and AFP reported that as many as 2,000 people were marching further north in Mandalay.

    Passersby cheered the protesters, with drivers flashing a three-finger salute in solidarity and blasting out a song that became an anthem during the country’s 1988 pro-democracy uprising, which was brutally put down by the military.

    A civil disobedience campaign has grown in recent days, with many doctors and teachers refusing to work. Every evening at about 8pm the sound of clanging metal rings out across Yangon as residents bang pots and pans in solidarity.

    Myanmar civil society organisations urged internet providers and mobile networks not to comply with the junta’s orders to restrict the internet, accusing them of “legitimising the military’s authority”.

    The Norwegian mobile network provider Telenor ASA said it had stressed to the authorities that access to telecom services should be maintained, but that it was bound by local law and its first priority was the safety of its local workers.

    The UN human rights office said on Saturday that “internet and communication services must be fully restored to ensure freedom of expression and access to information”.

  74. says

    Excellent thread from last night:

    Kagan:

    “I fervently hope that the Court’s intervention will not worsen the Nation’s COVID crisis. But if this decision causes suffering, we will not pay. Our marble halls are now closed to the public, and our life tenure forever insulates us from responsibility for our errors.”

    Kagan, joined by Sotomayor and Breyer, dissented from the Supreme Court’s order tonight lifting COVID restrictions on California churches. It is an extraordinary opinion.

    “The Court injects uncertainty into an area where uncertainty has human costs.”…

  75. blf says

    In teh “U”K, Misogynists are trying to silence me: abuse bill commissioner:

    […]
    London’s first commissioner for victims has revealed how misogynists are attempting to silence her attempts to tackle domestic violence.

    Claire Waxman, who is campaigning for amendments to the domestic abuse bill, says her work is prompting an increasingly coordinated online response from largely anonymous social media accounts designed to discredit and intimidate her from continuing. “Particularly around the area of the family courts and domestic abuse bill I have received a huge amount of abuse which has misogyny at its root, people who are trying to create a gender war,” she said.

    “If I speak out we see the abuse intensify. It’s to try and silence what I am seeing and the work I am doing.”

    […]

    Waxman said that failings in the family courts needed to be urgently addressed, warning that women were being encouraged to suppress allegations of domestic abuse as judges were more concerned with granting both parents access to children.

    The family court’s principle of “contact at all costs” for parents and their children meant abuse was repeatedly being swept under the carpet, said Waxman, jeopardising the welfare of women and minors. “We see real evidence of victims of domestic abuse — mainly mothers — being told and advised to not bring up any mention of domestic abuse. This promotion of contact at all costs means that victims of abuse are expected to put their abuse aside,” she said.

    Her proposed amendment to the domestic abuse bill, which has been described as a once-in-a-generation chance to tackle the issue, would introduce an initial “no contact” approach where there has been a conviction, restraining order or other evidence of abuse.

    […]

  76. blf says

    The title of this article in the Grauniad, a “U”K-based paper, is focused on a relatively minor incident involving hair fair and the then-“U”K PM, Theresa May (shades of Three Britons among 250 dead-headlines / -reporting “U”K newspapers are historically notorious for). It’s perhaps the rest of the article which is interesting, How Donald Trump’s hand-holding led to panicky call home by Theresa May (Grauniad’s edits in {curly braces}):

    A remarkable BBC documentary reveals the startling reality of meeting the president [sic]

    […]

    With Trump out of power, those who had ringside seats during four years of dangerous and often chaotic foreign policy are now describing their — often bruising — encounters in a major new documentary series.

    The three-part BBC series, Trump Takes on the World, by the award-winning documentary maker Norma Percy, reveals extraordinary access to key observers of the president [sic].

    [… T]o European diplomatic observers, he seemed a “strange creature”. And he also triggered alarm among some American officials in the room with him, with one defence official noting that the president’s [sic] notoriously short attention span suggested a “squirrel careening through the traffic”.

    [… May] had gone into the meeting determined to persuade the president [sic] to make a statement backing Nato and warn him over his closeness to Vladimir Putin.

    [… K]een to raise the issue of Putin, May asked Trump if he had spoken to the Russian leader, which Trump denied. At that point, however, Trump’s chief of staff intervened to tell the president [sic] that Putin had actually called, but not been put through.

    [Former joint chief of staff at No 10, Fiona McLeod] Hill takes up the story of the “toe-curling” outburst. “Trump at this point looks not orange but red. He flipped. Furious.” In front of May, he scolded his advisers in what [then US undersecretary for political affairs, Thomas] Shannon recalled as “an unseemly moment”. “He said: You’re telling me that Vladimir Putin called the White House and you’re only telling me now during this lunch? … Vladimir Putin is the only man in the world who can destroy the United States and I didn’t take his call.”

    […]

    Expectations of Trump from European leaders were not so much low as non-existent. For the former French president François Hollande, who dealt with Trump only briefly, an early red flag was raised when the US leader [sic] asked him in all earnestness who he should appoint to his team in the White House. “I thought he was just being courteous; it was pretty outrageous. Imagine I phoned Obama and said: ‘You know France well, who should I appoint as an adviser?’” Later, briefing his successor Macro [sic (thank you Grauniad!)] during the transition, Hollande was clear how he regarded the US leader — sentiments Percy herself regards as a summing up how many foreign leaders viewed the Trump era.

    “I said to {Macron},” Hollande recalls, “don’t expect anything from Donald Trump. Do not think you’ll be able to change his mind. Don’t think that it’s possible to turn him or seduce him. Don’t imagine that he won’t follow through with his own agenda.”

    […]

  77. blf says

    me@101, Good grief! hair fair → hair furor

    Looks at his drink… probably too much Génépy des Alpes (a lovely artisanale liqueur (a type of gin? (not sure))), mixed with an limonade artisanale. Easy to drink. And lethal.

  78. blf says

    US to end deals to send asylum seekers back to Central America:

    Rights groups have long denounced accords allowing Trump administration to deport asylum seekers at US border.

    The United States has moved to end agreements with three Central American nations under which former President [sic] Donald Trump’s administration intended to send migrants and asylum seekers who arrived at the US border back to those countries.

    In a statement on Saturday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said President Joe Biden’s administration is suspending the accords with the governments of Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, effective immediately.

    [… various details…]

  79. blf says

    KG@106, Test

    Her Highness Sheikha Moza bint Nasser

    I was thinking it was the 5th word, which is an offensive / derogatory term for a female in English, but redacting the full quoted name didn’t help. (Nor did several other redactions I tried.) I’m puzzled.

  80. says

    Republicans in three states are trying to ban the 1619 Project from schools

    The 1619 Project is not losing its status as a favored punching bag of Republicans—in fact, the campaign against it has entered a new, dangerous stage. Efforts by Donald Trump and Sen. Tom Cotton to ban the collection commemorating the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first enslaved Africans in what later became the United States were symbolic, because the federal government does not set curriculum.

    The 1619 Project seeks to fully write Black people into the center of U.S. history—where they have been all along, even if the written histories have often excluded or marginalized them. State legislators in Arkansas, Iowa, and Mississippi want to keep pushing Black people to the edges of the teaching of history, and they want to write that into law. That’s not symbolic, because state legislatures can set curriculum.

    The proposed legislation would reduce school district budgets if they teach the 1619 Project curriculum created by the Pulitzer Center alongside The New York Times’ release of the essay series. Literally the people involved in this legislation are so threatened by information that would provide a different perspective on U.S. history that they are trying to pass laws to make sure students don’t hear it.

    In part, educators say, this stems from a misunderstanding of what teaching history entails, at least in the hands of a good teacher with the leeway to offer multiple angles and sources.

    “Any good social studies teacher is certainly using a variety of things in their classroom, and asking their students to critique what they are reading,” Stefanie Wager, the president of the National Council for the Social Studies, told EdWeek. “The work of historians, the work of social studies teachers, is engaging students in uncovering that evidence, and challenging and weighing that evidence. To try to squash that, or stop that in any way, is not the mark of a quality social studies educator.” […]

    Link

  81. says

    The Fossil Fuel Debate’s Most Bizarre Byproduct: “Petro-Masculinity”

    Ramping up fossil fuel production and shredding pollution rules, as the Trump administration did for four years, largely defies economic and scientific logic in an era of costly climate disasters. But Larry Kudlow, who was director of the National Economic Council for part of that time, may have indicated Wednesday that the administration saw its policies on fossil fuels through another lens: culture.

    During an interview with […] Maria Bartiromo, Kudlow dismissed President Joe Biden as an ideologue whose approach to climate change threatens to “wreck the whole energy sector.”

    “It turns out President Biden may be the most left-wing president we’ve ever seen,” Kudlow said. “His actions on spending and taxing and regulating, on immigration and fossil fuels and other cultural issues… he may be the most left-wing.”

    […] the idea of defining fossil fuels as a “cultural issue” gets at something that typically goes unacknowledged in policy debates over how to deal with the industry most responsible for destabilizing the planet’s ecosystems. For conservatives, fossil fuel fights are just another front in the U.S. culture war that’s been waged for decades over issues like same-sex marriage and abortion.

    On the other hand, the economic logic of pumping and burning more oil, gas and coal is difficult to square.

    Already, the planet has warmed 1.2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial averages, yielding biblically terrifying and astronomically expensive results in the form of deadly floods and fires, prolonged droughts and ravenous locust swarms. Last year, the United States alone suffered a record-breaking 22 warming-fueled disasters that each topped $1 billion in damages.

    […] Tiny particles from fossil fuels that pollute the air kill as many as 4.5 million people worldwide each year, and result in global economic costs totaling roughly $8 billion per day, a study published last year by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air found.

    […] fossil fuel producers rely heavily on debt and generous government subsidies to turn profits. About 50% of new oil drilling in the U.S. would be unprofitable without subsidies, according to a 2017 study in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Energy.

    Over the past decade, cheap loans from Wall Street investors boosted the popularity of hydraulic fracturing, the drilling technique known as fracking—thereby flooding the market with supply and reducing the price of oil and gas. The sector’s success was its own undoing: Between 2012 and 2017, the 30 largest shale producers lost more than $50 billion, according to a Wall Street Journal estimate. From 2015 to 2016, an eyebrow-raising 91% of all corporate debt defaults in the United States were in the oil and gas sector, the financial research firm Moody’s calculated in 2019.

    Now that policymakers are starting to heed scientists’ calls to rapidly transition the global economy away from fossil fuels, even the mightiest companies are showing signs of financial atrophy. Exxon Mobil Corp., the Western world’s largest oil explorer, lost its place in the Dow Jones Industrial Average stock index last August as its debt, and its obstinate refusal to plan for a low-carbon future, repelled investors. This week, the company reported its first annual loss in at least 40 years.

    […] What, then, explains the political power of fossil fuels? Hefty political donations and the long-term need for some supply of the fuels, albeit paired with some kind of technology to capture emissions, only tell part of the story. The industry, especially in the U.S., also serves as an avatar for a certain kind of cultural worldview, one that resonates with tough-guy masculinity and patriarchal families.

    […] In 2014, researchers in Sweden found that climate denial was “intertwined with a masculinity of industrial modernity that is on decline.” Those who defended the industries destabilizing the planet were trying “to save an industrial society” that men like them had built and dominated […]

    In 2018, Virginia Tech political scientist Cara Daggett gave the concept a name: petro-masculinity.

    “The concept of petro-masculinity suggests that fossil fuels mean more than profit,” Daggett wrote in the international studies journal Millennium. “Fossil fuels also contribute to making identities, which poses risks for post-carbon energy politics.” […]

  82. KG says

    Lynna, OM@113,

    Interesting article. Cultural divisions also crop up when the alternatives to fossil fuels are considered. The “macho” alternative is nuclear power; the “greenie” alternatives are renewables and demand reduction. There are genuine arguments on both sides (I think considerably stronger on the “greenie” side), but it’s hard to avoid the culture clash.

  83. says

    Wonkette: “It’s Super Bowl Sunday: Stay Home, Don’t Huddle With Strangers”

    The 55th Super Bowl is tonight. The grossly named Kansas City Chiefs will play against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Companies will sell you products during breaks from all that thrilling football. Uptight people will complain about something that happens during the halftime show. The world seems almost normal again, but don’t be fooled! We’re still wrestling with the COVID-19 pandemic — metaphorically because you shouldn’t touch anyone right now.

    […] Last year, 62,417 attended the Super Bowl at the Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida. Today’s “Big Game” will have attendance capped at roughly 25,000 live (for now) fans. This includes 7,500 vaccinated front-line healthcare workers, who the NFL kindly invited as guests. (Vaccinated people can still contract and spread COVID-19.) This is close to 40 percent of the stadium’s capacity of 65,890.

    I’ve eaten at Frenchy’s in Clearwater, Florida, and I agree with Governor Ron DeSantis that the restaurant has some of the best seafood in the state. He’d make a decent Yelp! reviewer, but he’s a lousy governor, whose COVID-19 response has been a disaster. He declared in December that he won’t impose any more mask mandates or lockdowns because they just don’t work (they do, in fact, work).

    “The lie of the lockdown was that if you just locked down, then you can beat the virus,” [DeSantis] said. “Then why are people having to lockdown two or three times then?”

    Because, Governor Einstein, the United States never had a full, hardcore lockdown. The one-term loser started pushing for the country to “reopen” in April, and since then, most COVID-19 “rules” were merely “suggestions” that idiots mostly ignored.

    Shannon Palus at Slate wrote:

    The “rules” also vary a lot by geographical location. Coronavirus is surging nationally, but indoor dining—which involves, by necessity, taking your mask off and moving your mouth such that it produces aerosols, which are what spreads the coronavirus—is banned in just a few places, like Seattle, California, Michigan, and maybe, soon, New York. In some states, indoor gatherings are capped at 10 people, or there’s a recommended cap of a couple households, but in others, there are simply no restrictions. In many places, the restrictions there are make no sense—the government of Minnesota has, for some reason, banned outdoor gatherings of any sort, but wedding venues and churches are still allowed to open their doors to as many as 250 people. The difference in policies doesn’t even correlate with where cases are highest: Leadership in South Dakota, for example, refused to establish so much as a mask mandate while cases there were the highest in the nation. Often, it doesn’t align with what the science says about transmission, like New York allowing restaurants to remain open while schools close.

    It’s all a big, hot mess, which is how most travel guides describe Florida. The state has at least 1.7 million reported COVID-19 cases — almost 10 percent of its population — and 27,456 Floridians have died. The death toll’s daily average was 171 people over the past seven days.

    […] Visit Tampa Bay spent $7 million in CARES Act funds to promote tourism in a COVID-19 petri dish. The campaign highlighted “outdoor activities, open spaces and reduced crowds at area amenities,” where no one bothers to wear a mask or social distance. Mayor Jane Castor is looking forward to the crush of “Big Game”-related tourism.

    “Of course, you have to have a concern: We’re in the midst of a pandemic, there’s no denying that, and it’s a virus that is easily transferable,” Ms. Castor said of the Super Bowl. “But on the other hand, it can be easily managed if people take the simple steps of wearing masks and separating when possible.”

    Tampa has a mask mandate, but the governor bans enforcement of mandate violations. It’s like the scene in Pulp Fiction when Vincent Vega explained Amsterdam’s casual approach to drug enforcement. COVID-19 digs it the most.

    Bars will be open, and “separating when possible” seems unrealistic under the conditions. However, Super Bowl parties at home are even bigger superspreader threat. A reported 25 percent of Americans plan to attend gatherings with people outside their household, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention doesn’t recommend. Among diehard sports fans, that number increases to 40 percent.

    Meanwhile, Broadway remains closed and New York’s theatre district is devastated. But nothing must stop the “Big Game.”

    Link

  84. says

    KG @114, true. Remember the hardcore fossil fuel burners who indulged in “rolling coal”? YouTube link. That was definitely a cultural statement.

    In other news: “U.K. coronavirus variant spreading rapidly through United States, study finds”

    The coronavirus variant that shut down much of the United Kingdom is spreading rapidly across the United States, outcompeting other mutant strains and doubling its prevalence among confirmed infections every week and a half, according to new research made public Sunday.

    The report, posted on the preprint server MedRxiv and not yet peer-reviewed or published in a journal, comes from a collaboration of many scientists and provides the first hard data to support a forecast issued last month by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that showed the United Kingdom variant becoming dominant in the U.S. by late March.

    The variant, known as B.1.1.7, is more contagious than earlier forms of the coronavirus and may also be more lethal, although that is far less certain. It carries a package of mutations, including many which change the structure of the spike protein on the surface of the virus and enhance its ability to bind to human receptor cells.

    People infected with the variant have higher viral loads, studies have shown, and they may shed more virus when coughing or sneezing.

    The authors of the new study urge action to limit the spread of the variant.
    “Our study shows that the U.S. is on a similar trajectory as other countries where B.1.1.7 rapidly became the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant, requiring immediate and decisive action to minimize covid-19 morbidity and mortality,” the authors write.

    Masks and social distancing will continue to limit its spread, and vaccines remain effective against it, disease experts point out.

    Florida stands out as the state with the highest prevalence of the variant. The new report estimated the doubling time of B.1.1.7 prevalence in positive test results at 9.1 days.

    Florida also leads the nation in reported cases involving B.1.1.7, with 187 infections as of Thursday, followed by much-more-populous California with 145 infections, according to the CDC. […]

    Washington Post link

    Florida, where the Super Bowl is being held.

  85. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Lynna@116. I received an e-mail from the Lake County (IL) Health Department, which said the B.1.1.7 strain arrived in the county in late December from an international flier. So its spreading here too.
    I received another e-mail from the charity I did volunteer driving for prior to the pandemic, taking seniors to their medical appointments, that their drivers are considered essential workers by state guidelines. This won’t change my general category (1b), but may allow me to get the vaccine quicker within that group.

  86. says

    Nerd @117, thanks for the additional info. Also, do whatever you can to get the vaccine quicker.

    I know a healthy 30-something school nurse’s assistant who is not currently required to go to work, but because the health care category is so loose, she has already had her two vaccination shots. Good for her, but people over 65 should have already received their vaccination shots in my opinion. Meanwhile, I’m still in a waiting line. Don’t even have an appointment.

    SC @118, agreed. That is not really a narrow margin.

    In other news: Biden inherited a USPS crisis. Here’s how Democrats want to fix it.
    Washington Post link

    The nation’s mail service is slower and more erratic than it’s been in generations, via the confluence of an abrupt reorganization and pandemic-era anomalies that has fueled demands for reform and fundamentally different ideas on how to achieve it.

    On one side is Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who, with the backing of the U.S. Postal Service’s governing board, is expected as soon as next week to outline a new vision for the agency, one that includes more service cuts, higher and region-specific pricing, and lower delivery expectations. [WTF!]

    But congressional Democrats are pressing President Biden to install new board members, creating a majority bloc that could oust DeJoy, a Trump loyalist whose aggressive cost-cutting over the summer has been singled out for much of the performance decline. The fight over the agency’s future is expected to be fraught and protracted, leaving Americans with unreliable mail delivery for the foreseeable future.

    Meanwhile, customers are fuming on social media and to postal workers about late holiday packages and days-long delivery gaps. Only 38 percent of nonlocal first-class mail arrived on time in late December, compared with 92 percent in the year-ago period, […] “It has historically done its job so well that you got to a point that the American people never questioned the Postal Service. … When something in your life is so important and it’s under pressure, you begin to worry about it in ways you never had to before.”

    The Postal Service is one of most logistically complex operations in government, ferrying billions of letters and packages a year. […]

    Boosters consider it a tentpole of the middle class, offering stable wages and benefits to its 644,000-member workforce and a low-cost shipping option to hundreds of thousands of businesses. Where some of its private-sector competitors have cut costs by hiring cheaper independent contractors, the Postal Service’s career workforce is its strength, they contend.

    But the coronavirus pandemic set off a chain reaction of crises: Package volumes swelled as Americans leaned into online shopping to limit outings. DeJoy’s summer overhaul hobbled long-held delivery protocols and jettisoned hundreds of sorting machines just as the pandemic was flattening its staff.

    What’s more, hundreds of millions of pieces of election mail flowed through the system during the primaries and through the November election. But DeJoy’s long support of Republican causes and million-dollar donations to President Donald Trump raised suspicions about how his postal changes might compromise ballot delivery, especially as Trump’s baseless attacks on the integrity of vote by mail grew louder.

    Through it all, the Postal Service’s financial position worsened: It lost $9.2 billion in 2020, despite collecting $73.2 billion in revenue.

    Democrats in Congress want a new postmaster general, which could happen only if the nine-member governing board changes. Though the administration has signaled it will move aggressively to rehabilitate the agency — Biden replaced the Republican chair of the Postal Regulatory Commission with a Democrat on Jan. 25 — there’s not much the president can do to intervene immediately in postal operations.

    […] Separately, lawmakers are considering an unusual accounting maneuver to give the Postal Service a nearly $100 billion credit for years of pension overpayments, according to four people familiar with the proposal, who spoke anonymously to discuss legislative plans. The move, which legislators in both the House and Senate have discussed and has not been previously reported, would shift responsibility for those funds onto the federal government.

    But even that bailout wouldn’t solve the agency’s looming financial problems. The credit would eliminate a little more than half of the Postal Service’s massive $188 billion in liabilities.

    […] Change came rapid-fire with DeJoy: One month in, he slashed overtime hours, prohibited late and extra mail delivery trips, and set stricter delivery schedules. […]

    Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), chairman of the House subcommittee in charge of postal issues, likened DeJoy’s changes to “deliberate sabotage” and suggested DeJoy was a patronage appointment.

    Trump, meanwhile, continued to undercut the Postal Service, telling Fox News on Aug. 12 that he wanted to deny it emergency pandemic funding specifically in order to prevent mail-in voting. Throughout the election season, he routinely and baselessly accused postal workers and election officials of trashing ballots and skewing election results. [Trump lied.]

    The Postal Service processed a staggering 135 million mail-in ballots […] It also moved more than 1.1 billion packages during the holiday season […]

    Lawmakers already have embarked on postal reform discussions, including a wider proposal allowing the agency to offer non-mail services that many legislators hope will be enacted by a new postmaster general.

    […] In a Jan. 25 letter, Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. (D-N.J.) urged Biden to fire every member of the board of governors. Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) made the same request on Jan. 29. Biden can remove governors “for cause,” which is not clearly defined by law. There is no indication the president is interested in such a move. “The board members’ refusal to oppose the worst destruction ever inflicted on the Postal Service was a betrayal of their duties and unquestionably constitutes good cause for their removal,” Pascrell wrote.

    […] The president also could push Congress to pass reform legislation for the first time since the 2006 bill that created the Postal Service’s prefunded retiree health-care obligation. Members of both parties in the House and Senate introduced legislation Monday to repeal that requirement and allow the Postal Service to pay off health-care costs annually, as most private corporations and government agencies do. That legislation passed the House in the last Congress but failed in the Senate.

    The Postal Service, Partenheimer said, favors integrating retiree health-care costs into Medicare, which would shift tens of billions of dollars worth of obligations off the mail service and onto taxpayers.

    That repeal, combined with elevated package volumes and a new postage rate hike, could be enough, some experts say, to put the Postal Service on more stable financial footing and stave off more congressional intervention. […]

    USPO organizational chart, and more solutions to the USPO problems, are available at the link.

  87. says

    Trump’s lie that the election was stolen has cost $519 million (and counting) as taxpayers fund enhanced security, legal fees, property repairs and more.

    Washington Post link

    […] Trump’s onslaught of falsehoods about the November election misled millions of Americans, undermined faith in the electoral system, sparked a deadly riot — and has now left taxpayers with a large, and growing, bill.

    The total so far: $519 million.

    The costs have mounted daily as government agencies at all levels have been forced to devote public funds to respond to actions taken by Trump and his supporters […] The expenditures include legal fees prompted by dozens of fruitless lawsuits, enhanced security in response to death threats against poll workers, and costly repairs needed after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol. That attack triggered the expensive massing of thousands of National Guard troops on the streets of Washington amid fears of additional extremist violence.

    Although more than $480 million of the total is attributable to the military’s estimated expenses for the troop deployment through mid-March, the financial impact of the president’s refusal to concede the election is probably much higher than what has been documented thus far, and the true costs may never be known.

    […] “I think anytime you see an event like we saw on January 6th, it changes your perspective going forward. You don’t take things for granted like we used to,” said Michael Rapich, superintendent of the Utah Highway Patrol, which spent $227,000 on Jan. 17 to deploy 300 troopers to the state’s Capitol after threats of an armed siege by Trump supporters ahead of the inauguration of President Biden. “It is an incredible amount of money to spend.”

    Other states spent even more, and officials are beginning to draft new security budgets that suggest ongoing security costs will grow significantly in the future as a result of the Capitol breach.

    The bill to the federal government continues to grow daily, as thousands of National Guard troops patrol Washington and lawmakers consider a supplemental spending proposal to bolster their security.

    The 25,000 troops that were deployed to Washington traveled on military planes and stayed in local hotels […] The cost estimate of the troops, first reported by Bloomberg News, covers the troop presence at the Capitol through mid-March […] an unprecedented show of force that included checkpoints and militarized zones in Washington, the troops succeeded in thwarting efforts to disrupt Biden’s swearing-in, which took place on the same platform stormed by Trump-supporting rioters two weeks earlier. […]

    A table showing the costs, by category, is available at the link.

  88. says

    Amy Davidson Sorkin, writing for The New Yorker, “What’s at Stake in Trump’s Second Impeachment Trial.”

    As President, Donald Trump often seemed surprised to discover what was and was not constitutional. His lawyers now seem intent on perpetuating that confusion at his impeachment trial. Last week, one of them, David Schoen, said in an interview with Fox News that “fair-minded people” don’t support using impeachment to “bar someone from running for office again”—even though that is one of the two punishments for conviction that the Constitution specifies. Schoen also issued a challenge: if there is an attempt to call witnesses in the trial, “you also should be able to call, then, many of the senators as witnesses, because of the awful bias and prejudgment they’ve shown.”

    It wasn’t clear which senators Schoen had in mind […] The Senate’s rules allow its members to be impeachment witnesses (and to have a say in what witnesses to call), and any number of them might offer vivid descriptions of the violence, which Trump is accused of inciting. But such accounts can hardly be what Schoen is after. As he said on Fox, he didn’t think that, at the trial, the House managers should show videos documenting how Trump’s followers, after the President told them at a rally earlier that day to go to the Capitol and “fight like hell,” did just that. “Why does the country need that now?” Schoen asked. His goal, it seemed, was to put the senators on trial instead.

    The House managers weren’t deterred. Three days after Schoen’s interview, Representative Jamie Raskin, of Maryland, the lead manager, sent a letter to Trump inviting him to testify. […] Trump would find a trial, where he is subject to cross-examination, to be a very different experience than Twitter. His no doubt outrageous claims would make the stakes plain, perhaps even to Republicans. […] Trump and his defenders continue to dispute even the basic facts of the events surrounding the attack on the Capitol. In a fourteen-page pretrial brief that Schoen and his co-counsel, Bruce Castor, filed last week, they deny that Trump’s imprecations to the crowd were anything but a general statement about election security, or that he asked the Georgia secretary of state to “find” enough votes to give him the state—although that exchange, an apparent election-law violation, is on tape. Trump, as depicted in the brief, is a peace-loving, free-speech martyr.

    Trump brought in Schoen and Castor just a week before the trial’s opening, after parting ways with his previous team. […] Schoen has spoken of representing “reputed mobster figures,” and had been in discussions with Jeffrey Epstein, the sexual abuser, before he killed himself in jail.[…] Castor, a former district attorney in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, declined to prosecute Bill Cosby for sexual assault, and later sued one of Cosby’s victims for defamation. […] Perhaps the attorneys’ experiences have prepared them to juggle improbable excuses for Trump’s behavior.

    In their brief, they write that, since Trump is no longer President, the impeachment trial is “a legal nullity.” In fact, there is strong support for post-Presidential proceedings in constitutional history and in precedent; otherwise, there would be no real penalty for a late-in-the-term coup attempt. (What’s more, Trump was President on the day he was impeached; only the trial is occurring in his post-Presidency.) The Constitution also gives the Senate great latitude in running a trial.

    But the nullity argument, as flimsy as it is, has come to be seen as a safe harbor by Republicans who want to forget that January 6th ever happened. Senator Rand Paul earlier sought a dismissal of the case on that ground […] Trump’s party is not ready to walk away from him. […]

    [Trump] made it clear that the task at hand was to intimidate Vice-President Mike Pence, whom Trump had directed, both publicly and, reportedly, in meetings behind closed doors, to throw out electoral votes, in violation of the Constitution.

    (Even after the mob had breached the Capitol, and began searching for the Vice-President, Trump tweeted, “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done.”)

    Pence would be a good witness. So would aides who reportedly pleaded with Trump to take quick action to protect the Capitol, and found him uninterested. The managers, in their brief, call his failure to act a “dereliction of duty.” In many instances, Trump was invoking the power he had as President. It is not the case then that, as Castor argued last week, we are going through an impeachment trial “just because somebody gave a speech and people got excited.”

    New Yorker link

  89. says

    Guardian (support the Guardian if you can!) – “Netanyahu’s corruption trial resumes weeks before Israeli election”:

    Benjamin Netanyahu has told judges he is innocent of corruption charges, as a high-profile trial against the Israeli prime minister resumed weeks before a national election.

    Following a nearly-half-year hiatus and repeated delays due to the pandemic, hearings restarted on Monday. The court expected to announce a schedule for the potentially explosive witness testimony and evidence stage of the trial.

    Israel’s longest-serving leader is alleged to have accepted hundreds of thousands of pounds in luxury gifts from billionaire friends and traded valuable favours with Israeli media and telecoms moguls for favourable news coverage.

    Netanyahu, the first serving Israeli premier to go on trial, has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, alleging he is the victim of a politically motivated witch-hunt.

    Regular court appearances could present an image problem for Netanyahu, who also faces discontent over his handling of the coronavirus pandemic. Israel, with a population of 9 million, is facing a relatively high death toll and infection rate.

    Netanyahu is betting on a world-leading vaccination campaign to yield results before the 23 March national vote. More than one in three Israelis have received jabs, and last week the country opened vaccinations to anyone over the age of 16.

    Netanyahu’s steadfast popularity among many rightwing voters has been a central sticking point in the crisis. While his bickering rivals have sought to capitalise on the corruption allegations, it is unclear if the issue has significantly swayed the Israeli electorate.

    Indicted in 2019 in three separate cases, Netanyahu faces more than a decade in prison if convicted, although the trial could take years.

    Unlike one of his predecessors, Ehud Olmert, who stepped down after it appeared he would be indicted, Netanyahu has refused to leave power.

  90. says

    Guardian – “Chechnya opens terror inquiry into gay men forcibly returned from Moscow”:

    Chechnya has opened a terrorism investigation into two gay men who fled the region last year but were arrested near Moscow last week and forcibly returned.

    The rights group that helped the men escape Chechnya, an autonomous Russian republic where the torture, detentions and killings of gay men have been reported since 2017, said they weren’t certain why exactly the men were being persecuted but that one of them had earlier been interrogated for sharing LGBTQ emojis in an online group.

    Salekh Magamadov and Ismail Isayev, aged 20 and 17, were in the city of Nizhny Novgorod, east of Moscow, when they were abducted last Thursday, according to the Russian LGBT Network.

    One of the men rang the network’s emergency hotline in the afternoon, and a worker for the organisation heard screaming in the background of the call. A rights lawyer who visited the flat where they were staying said he saw signs of a struggle shortly after.

    The two men later re-emerged in detention in Chechnya. Tim Bestsvet, a spokesperson for the LGBT Network, said lawyers were being denied access to the men and did not know where they were being held.

    Bestsvet said he was concerned for the pair’s safety, pointing to other cases when men had been brought back to the republic only to disappear or die. The network learned only through Chechen media that they were being detained on suspicion of “aiding terrorism”.

    Akhmed Dudyaev, an aide to Chechnya’s leader Ramzan Kadyrov, said the men had confessed to helping an illegal armed group. The crime carries a sentence of up to 15 years’ imprisonment.

    Dudyaev insisted the detention was legal and that any attempt to influence the case would be “senseless and futile”.

    Magamadov and Isayev fled Chechnya in June 2020 after being arrested and reportedly tortured for running an opposition channel on the Telegram messaging app.

    Videos later appeared online of the pair apologising for running the channel. In one clip, a visibly distressed Magamadov said: “I am not a man, I am an empty space.” In another, Isayev asks for forgiveness for behaving in an “unmanly” way.

    The Russian LGBT Network has helped 200 people flee Chechnya, either abroad or to other areas of the country, since the outbreak of “gay purges” in the republic four years ago in response to what Chechen authorities saw as the increased visibility of the Russian gay rights movement.

    Officials have dismissed reports of such purges, despite several men going public to tell of abductions and police brutality. Kadyrov, who is accused of other human rights abuses, has claimed there are no gay men in Chechnya.

    Moscow has been criticised both for its failure to properly investigate the reports and for its own stance on LGBTQ rights. A so-called “gay propaganda” law from 2013 that bans the “promotion of non-traditional sexual relations to minors” has been used to pressure activists.

  91. says

    Also in the Guardian:

    “Three-finger salute: Hunger Games symbol adopted by Myanmar protesters”:

    From Thailand to Myanmar, pro-democracy protesters are raising the three finger salute in opposition to military dictatorships. Adopted from the Hunger Games films, the gesture has become a symbol of resistance and solidarity for democracy movements in south-east Asia.

    The salute was first used in Myanmar last week by medical workers, then youth protesters started raising it in opposition to the military coup. On Monday, one week after the takeover, the hand gesture could be seen during huge protests on the streets of Yangon.

    The gesture was first seen in Thailand just days after a military coup in May 2014 that caused outrage among voters across the kingdom….

    Since 2014, the hand gesture has been used widely in Thailand at protest sites.

    “We knew that it would be easily understood to represent concepts of freedom, equality, solidarity,” [Thai pro-democracy activist Sirawith Seritiwat] said. He added that the anti-authoritarian messaging conveyed in the Hunger Games films resonated with the youth protesters at the time.

    “It was partly because the anti-coup situation back then felt similar to scenes in the Hunger Games film, where people put three fingers up towards President Snow,” he said.

    “It’s time for Africa to rein in Tanzania’s anti-vaxxer president”:

    What is wrong with President John Magufuli? Many people in and outside Tanzania are asking this question.

    Magufuli claimed last year that God had eliminated Covid in the east African country of 60 million people, and has since made dismissing Covid vaccines his central priority…

    …In his crusade as an anti-vaxxer president, he has gone from repeatedly playing down the virus and mocking World Health Organization guidance to falsely claiming that Tanzania is Covid-free, and now to outrightly attacking his people for being vaccinated, fuelling denialism and conspiracies.

    For a continent already battered by health and social issues, including hunger, malaria, displacement, unemployment, violence and insecurity, Magufuli’s unconscionable stance should compel us all to act.

    Magufuli, who won another five-year term amid fraud allegations in 2020, is still fuelling anti-vaxxers as the pandemic and its new variants continue to play out. He needs to be challenged openly and directly. To look on indifferently exposes millions of people in Tanzania and across Africa’s great lakes region – as well as communities across the world – to this deadly and devastating virus.

  92. says

    It’s been very noticeable how one-sided the coverage of conflict between teachers’ unions and cities about reopening schools has been on cable news. I’ve seen Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot on MSNBC and CNN, and she’ll be on again today to talk about a tentative agreement. I don’t believe I’ve heard the cable hosts even say that they invited union representatives on to give their side but they declined. From what I’ve seen, they don’t think it’s important to get this perspective at all.

  93. says

    Here’s a link to the February 8 Guardian coronavirus world liveblog.

    From there:

    WHO panel to meet to discuss AstraZeneca vaccine

    A World Health Organization panel is due to meet to discuss the AstraZeneca vaccine on Monday, the use of which has been suspended in South Africa over concern over its efficacy in over-65s.

    AFP writes that a trial showed the vaccine provides only “minimal” protection against mild to moderate Covid-19 caused by the variant first detected in South Africa, a setback to the global fight against the pandemic as many poorer nations are relying on the logistical advantages offered by the AstraZeneca shot (it doesn’t need to be stored at very low temperatures).

    “It’s a temporary issue that we have to hold on AstraZeneca until we figure out these issues,” Health Minister Zweli Mkhize told reporters on Sunday.

    The 1.5m AstraZeneca vaccines obtained by South Africa, which will expire in April, will be kept until scientists give clear indications on their use, he added.

    AstraZeneca, which developed the shot with the University of Oxford, told AFP: “We do believe our vaccine will still protect against severe disease.”

    A company spokesperson said researchers were already working to update the vaccine to deal with the South African variant, which has been spreading rapidly around the world.

    The WHO panel is due to meet in Geneva to examine the shot, which is a major component of the initial Covax global vaccine rollout that covers some 145 countries.

  94. says

    Guardian podcast (26 minutes) – “Inside the trial against the ‘Ndrangheta, Italy’s biggest mafia syndicate”:

    The Guardian’s Lorenzo Tondo tells Rachel Humphreys about the trial against the ‘Ndrangheta, the Calabrian mafia syndicate who are Italy’s most powerful organised crime group. The trial has 900 witnesses testifying against more than 350 people, including politicians and officials charged with being members of the syndicate. All eyes will be on Emanuele Mancuso, who has been revealing the clan’s secrets after accepting police protection. He is set to testify against his uncle, Luigi Mancuso, said to be the region’s most powerful mafia figure.

    Rachel also talks to the Guardian journalist Clare Longrigg, who has written several books on the mafia. Clare tells Rachel about the history of the ‘Ndrangheta and how they have been become so powerful, predominately through a global network of drug trafficking.

    Very informative. When they discussed the judges who were murdered in the 1990s, I was reminded of Alexander Stille’s Excellent Cadavers: The Mafia and the Death of the First Italian Republic.

  95. says

    Will Bunch in the Philadelphia Inquirer – “Roger Stone, Michael Flynn and the criminal conspiracy case of U.S. v. Donald Trump”:

    …This weekend a flurry of new reports establishes that Stone, recently pardoned by Trump after his felony conviction in Robert Mueller’s probe of 2016 Russian election interference, spent a busy two days in the hours leading up to the storming of the Capitol. Much of it was in the presence of key members of the violent Proud Boys group whose leaders now face criminal charges in connection with Jan. 6 and its run-up. ABC News released a video of Stone mingling with Oath Keepers, including one armed with a baseball bat, outside a D.C. hotel right before the rally that preceded the attack. Separately, the website Just Security scraped new footage from the right-wing social media platform Parler showing a series of contacts in December between Stone and top Proud Boys such as its national leader Enrique Tarrio — who didn’t take part in the insurrection after he was busted on weapons charges — and Ethan Nordean, who allegedly did breach the Capitol and has been charged by the feds with plotting the attack.

    On one side, the FBI — slowly, methodically, and appropriately — is using video, social media posts and tips to conduct a dragnet at the bottom of the food chain, the foot soldiers who were caught on film breaching the Capitol or foolishly bragging about it. So far, nearly 200 are facing federal charges, and these numbers continue to grow. On the other side, House impeachment managers must mount a speedy legal assault at the very top of the pyramid — demonstrating that Trump himself incited the rioters with his own words and deeds, leading right up to his midday rally speech where he urged the throng to march on the Capitol and “show strength.”

    But the future of unraveling the plot against the 2020 presidential election — and ensuring both justice and accountability as America struggles to regroup — lies in the middle tracks. What did the president know about the plans for Jan. 6, and when did he know it? Just as important if not more so, who were the next layer of players? — from White House aides to Trump’s motley crew of consiglieres to the business people who funded these efforts to the militia types who rallied their troops. It’s imperative that a newly made-over U.S. Justice Department dive deeply into these layers of criminality. Conspiracy is the hardest crime to prove, yet with each passing day, the money trail, the new evidence of coordinated meetings, and the other clues all point to a plot that originates with the former president.

    There are many avenues here, but let’s go down one: The pre-Jan. 6 activities of Stone and Trump’s disgraced former national security Michael Flynn, as well as Trump’s 11th-hour pardons of the two men. On Dec. 8, Trump issued a full pardon to Flynn, whose saga of twice pleading guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts to Russia following Trump’s 2016 election dragged on throughout the ex-president’s entire term. At the time, many questioned whether the pardon was a corrupt bargain — a reward for keeping other Team Trump secrets — but Flynn’s freedom has turned out to be more than anyone bargained for.

    Unshackled right at the moment when Trump’s feeble efforts in the courts and state legislatures to undo President Joe Biden’s victory were unraveling, Flynn immediately went to work. He urged Trump to consider declaring martial law to thwart Biden from claiming his election victory, and was rewarded with a prime speaking gig at that Jan. 5 D.C. event that also featured Stone, where he told the crowd littered with the next day’s insurrectionists that, “This country is awake. … We will not stand for a lie.” The soon-to-be-ex-president, for his part, toyed with bringing Flynn back into his administration, according to the New York Times, as chief of staff or even FBI director.

    Was Trump’s Dec. 8 pardon of Flynn a quid pro quo not just for past silence but future help, and would that cross the line into criminality? And if so, what are we to make of Trump’s pardon for Stone — whose prison sentence had already been commuted by the then-president in July — that was issued on Dec. 23? As Ryan Goodman and Justin Hendrix noted in their Just Security piece, Stone boasted on Parler just five days after the pardon that he met with Trump, thanked him — and offered advice on how to prevent Biden from being declared the winner. Stone also stepped up his highly visible activities on behalf of what allies called “Stop the Steal.”

    Again, this is just one avenue. Some other questions that have grown louder in recent days: What are we to make of the increasing evidence from social media posts of a flurry of pre-Jan. 6 meetings involving folks such as pro-Trump business leaders like the My Pillow guy Mike Lindell, Rudy Giuliani and the other diehard members of Trump’s legal team, and possibly even members of the ex-president’s immediate family and congressional allies? Where do Trump’s pressure-packed phone calls to election officials in Georgia and possibly other states fit in? What of 45′s last-ditch efforts to revamp the Justice Department, which failed, and the Pentagon, which succeeded … just ahead of its lackadaisical response to Jan. 6. And who gave the money behind all of this?

    The case for a felony criminal conspiracy involving not just Trump but some of the bold-faced names of the Trump years grows stronger every day. As this evidence mounts, the greatest obstacle seems less the facts and more America’s modern history of cowardice or worse when it comes to seeking justice and accountability for the people at or near the very top. In hindsight, Gerald Ford’s pardon of Nixon didn’t so much heal America as clear a path for the fresh wounds of Iran-Contra, the lack of prosecutions for everything from torture to Wall Street malfeasance in the 2000s, and finally this mess, in a nation where an absence of tension has been badly confused with the presence of justice.

    When we pretended that Roger Stone’s Brooks Brothers riot of 2000 was no big deal and not the car crash of democracy that it actually was, we also paved a clear highway to the nightmare of Jan. 6. If we look the other way this time, God only knows what the final carnage of the American Experiment might look like.

  96. says

    New York magazine – “Israel Is the World’s Most Vaccinated Country. Why Are Cases Rising?”:

    …[head of the infectious-disease unit at Tel Aviv’s Sheba Medical Center Galia] Rahav attributes the soaring rate of infection in the general population to the weariness of Israelis — on their third or fourth lockdown, depending on how you count — with having their children at home, restrictions limiting them to 1,000 yards from their homes, and of the “politicization” of the ever-shifting rules of confinement.

    Like many other countries, Israel launched its vaccination campaign with the two most vulnerable sectors: frontline medical workers and citizens over the age of 65. In January, as jubilant grandparents and ambulance drivers got vaccinated, and slowly stopped falling ill, younger and less cautious Israelis flouted caution — turning themselves into spreaders just as the highly infectious British mutation of the virus wafted into the country.

    Netanyahu ably steered Israel through the first wave of the pandemic, closing Israel’s schools, businesses, and borders and ordering a strict curfew that kept people to within 90 feet of their homes. On May 26, the day he all but declared the five-month-old pandemic over, only 281 Israelis had died from COVID-19. Netanyahu reopened schools, shops, restaurants, amusement parks, swimming pools, and even cable cars. “We want to make your lives better,” he said. “To make it possible for you to go out, return to normalcy, get a cup of coffee, enjoy a beer … so first of all, have fun.”

    …Almost immediately, driven by the shambolic reopening of schools, positive cases began to spike.

    “Netanyahu dropped the ball,” a senior official involved in the first lockdown told Intelligencer. “From April to July, no progress was made … Nothing was put into place, no framework for testing, no nationwide contact-tracing system, it was as if the crisis were over. Netanyahu was busy trying to put a government together and staying out of jail.”

    Israel’s hurried exit from the first lockdown, with no plan to guide the nation through the pandemic’s next phases, was widely panned. Jerusalem’s elite Gymnasia Rehavia was shuttered soon after reopening, when scores of teachers and students became sick. For reasons no one can now explain, Ben Gurion Airport never began to test arrivals for COVID-19. A summer of mass weddings, desert raves and in-person summer schools provoked a sharp uptick in the rate of infections, bringing Israel to its second lockdown in September, just in time to keep families apart during Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year.

    Around that time, Netanyahu took personal charge of Israel’s vaccine-procurement effort, speaking with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla 17 times and offering him a deal impossible to turn down: Israel would pay top dollar for the vaccines (about $31 per dose) and — skirting privacy laws — turn the anonymized but detailed data collected by its health-care network over to the company, an invaluable service.

    But as Israel boasts of its abundance of vaccines, the inequity of its situation stands out: Until last week, it did not distribute vaccines to the Palestinian Authority, the semi-autonomous government of the West Bank. This week, the Authority began a vaccination campaign with 7,000 doses of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines from Israel and 10,000 Sputnik V doses donated by Russia. The Palestinian government expects to receive more than 2 million additional doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines by next month, as part of the World Health Organization’s COVAX global-sharing initiative.

    Naftali Bennett, the former defense minister who coordinated much of the nation’s initial virus response and is now running to replace Netanyahu, accused the government of adopting a strategy that, in his words, can be summed up as, “We’re not going to manage the crisis in this country, we’re going to put all our eggs in the one basket: vaccines,” he told Intelligencer.

    “Israel’s entire strategy relies on the hope that no variant will escape the vaccine,” he continued. “If a mutation that can bypass the vaccine appears tomorrow, we’re in trouble.”

    On Thursday, at a cabinet meeting convened to debate the future of a partial, fraying lockdown, which is scheduled to end on Sunday, Netanyahu acknowledged that “the British mutation is running amok in Israel,” driving 80 percent of Israel’s recent COVID-19 fatalities.

    Health experts, who have grown accustomed to being ignored by the government, oppose lifting the lockdown, imperfect as it is. The government’s COVID czar, Nachman Ash, warned that “if we leave this lockdown with the figures as they are, we will need another lockdown in two weeks.”

    The advent of the British strain has been a game-changer for Israel. “The vaccines are a big success,” Ayman Seif, Israel’s deputy corona czar in charge of anti-COVID measures in the Arab community, told Intelligencer. “We began to see their effects, but it is not enough to curb the rise in contagion brought by the mutation.”

    …A government study showed that 44 percent of cases diagnosed in Israel between Thursday and Friday were found among citizens younger than 19. Only 6.2 were found in those ages 60 and older. Rahav said that hospital beds left free by the inoculated over-60 population are being filled by the under-50 crowd. “The British variant of the coronavirus brought us to our knees,” she said. Her hospital’s COVID wards remain at capacity, with ever younger patients.

    More atl.

  97. says

    TPM – “Top Conservative Lawyer Dismisses Argument That Impeachment Is Unconstitutional”:

    Chuck Cooper, one of the biggest Republican lawyers in Washington, rejected on Sunday GOP senators’ claim outlined in Sen. Rand Paul’s resolution (R-KY) that holding an impeachment trial for ex-President Donald Trump is unconstitutional because he is no longer in office.

    The lawyer urged the senators who had voted in favor of Paul’s resolution to “reconsider their view and judge the former president’s misconduct on the merits.”

    Cooper’s op-ed joins the chorus of constitutional experts who have refuted Republicans’ argument.

    Only five Republican senators sided with Democrats in voting against Paul’s resolution, signaling doom for efforts to successfully convict Trump after he encouraged a violent mob of his supporters to attack the Capitol last month.

    Cooper served as former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s attorney during Democrats’ first impeachment efforts against Trump in 2019. He also represented former Attorney General Jeff Sessions during Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

  98. says

    Guardian world liveblog:

    A 116-year-old nun has recovered from Covid-19 after it swept through a nursing home in the south of France, writes Kim Willsher, the Guardian’s Paris correspondent.

    Sister Andrée, born Lucile Randon in 1904, tested positive for the coronavirus last month at the Sainte-Catherine Labouré home near Toulon where, despite health safety measures, 81 of the 88 residents contracted the virus ten of whom died.

    The nun, who will celebrate her 117th birthday on Thursday, was reported to have suffered no Covid-19 symptoms but remained confined to her room unable to mix with other residents or attend mass. Nursing home staff told reporters her only complaint had been the “solitude”.

    “Sister Andrée, the oldest woman in France and Europe, has beaten the virus”…”France’s oldest woman Sister Andrée, sees off Covid-19”, read the French headlines….

    The region of Calabria in Italy has bought hundreds of thousands of anti-Covid face masks from an alleged Mafia-linked company, prosecutors said, writes Lorenzo Tondo, the Guardian’s correspondent in Palermo.

    According to Nicola Gratteri, an anti-mafia prosecutor and head of the Prosecutor’s Office in Catanzaro, the region of Calabria has bought face masks from a businessman recently arrested and described by investigators as the “business arm” of the ‘Ndragheta clans of Crotone, in Calabria.

    “Covid-19, which for the whole world represents the most tragic and sudden pandemic of the modern era, could become an extraordinary opportunity for ‘Ndrangheta, and for organised crime in general, to conquer new markets and launder money,” Italy’s chief of police, Franco Gabrielli, had warned last year.

    In December, Interpol had also issued a global alert to law enforcement across its 194 member countries warning them to prepare for organised crime networks targeting Covid-19 vaccines, both physically and online.

    (See #128 above for more.)

  99. says

    Trump Banned From Rejoining Screen Actors’ Union

    And stay out!

    Days after former President Trump canceled his membership of SAG-AFTRA, the show business union moved to ban Trump from ever applying for readmission on Sunday.

    […] Trump resigned his membership from the entertainment and media union SAG-AFTRA last week after the union’s national board found “probable cause” that the former president, who had been a member for more than 30 years, had “violated the union’s Constitution” after inciting the deadly Capitol insurrection last month. […]

    In his letter addressed to SAG-AFTRA president Gabrielle Carteris, Trump complained that the union had “done nothing” for him as he bragged about his brief cameos in film and television (which include “Zoolander” and “Home Alone 2” and plugged his reality show “The Apprentice”) and about how he “greatly helped” cable news networks by painting himself as a savior of their ratings, even if he thinks those networks are “fake news.”

    Carteris and national executive director David White simply responded to Trump’s resignation in a statement by writing: “Thank you.”

    Read SAG-AFTRA’s full resolution below.

    “WHEREAS, on or about January 13, 2021, disciplinary charges were filed against member Donald J. Trump (“Trump”), alleging that he engaged in actions antagonistic to the interests and integrity of SAG-AFTRA and its members in violation of Article XIV of the Constitution. The charges allege that the former President of the United States incited insurrection against the U.S. government at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and urged and incited anti-journalist animus that resulted in injuries and harm to SAG-AFTRA member journalists; and

    WHEREAS, on or about January 19, 2021, the National Board conducted a probable cause determination in which it found that there was sufficient basis for such charges to proceed to a disciplinary hearing; and

    […] on the eve of the hearing, Trump submitted a letter of resignation from his membership in SAG-AFTRA to President Carteris; and

    WHEREAS, by resigning from SAG-AFTRA, Trump voluntarily relinquished any membership rights he may have had under SAG-AFTRA’s governing documents as well as under federal law; and

    WHEREAS, the evidence of Mr. Trump’s misconduct and actions antagonistic to the interests of the union and its members is widely known […]

    WHEREAS, pursuant to Article III(A)(2) of the Constitution, “The National Board has discretion to deny membership to any applicant if, in its judgment, his or her admission to membership would not be in the best interests of the Union;”

    […] The National Board hereby finds that the well-documented actions by Donald J. Trump to undermine the peaceful transition of power in the United States, and to undermine the delivery of truthful information to the public by attacking journalists is anathema to the values embodied by SAG-AFTRA and to the members of SAG-AFTRA; and

    The National Board hereby finds that any future re-admission to membership of Donald J. Trump would not be in the best interests of the union; and

    The National Board hereby directs that any future application for admission to membership in SAG-AFTRA by Donald J. Trump shall be denied.

    Donald Trump shall be denied.

  100. says

    Wonkette: “Tampa Fans Throw Post-Super Bowl Superspreader Jamboree!”

    After Tom Brady made Super Bowl history Sunday night, fans made their own dumb history in the streets of Tampa, Florida. COVID-19 still exists, unlike the Kansas City Chiefs’ Super Bowl aspirations, but Tampa Mayor Jane Castor claimed the risks could be managed if people would “take the simple steps of wearing masks and separating when possible.” Please take a seat as we shock you with the news that thousands of drunk Floridians didn’t follow Castor’s advice. [Video available at the link.]

    […] the Fauci Grinch tried to stop COVID-19 from coming, but the idiots in Idiot-ville showed us the true meaning of stupidity. They flooded the streets, packed bars, and chanted sports-related cheers, unmasked and at a high volume, possibly projecting coronavirus to all the people who weren’t social distancing.

    Castor released a cute video last week with Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas where they reminded everyone that COVID-19 was real and urged people to practice responsible Super Bowl viewing. Lucas advised celebrating in small groups rather than in crowded bars. Castor suggested ordering takeout from your favorite local restaurant and, you know, STAYING HOME. If you insisted on going out to celebrate, at least wear a mask, for God’s sake. Castor and Lucas tried their best, but it seemed like no one listened.

    Florida has at least 1.7 million reported COVID-19 cases — almost 10 percent of its population — and more than 28,000 Floridians have died. However, GOP Governor Ron DeSantis opposes most COVID-19 restrictions and has actively obstructed attempts to enforce them. Last month, DeSantis said, “We’ve got to trust people … Give them the information to, you know, ask that they use common sense.” (I’m sure he thought that was a sentence when he said it.)

    Here’s some more footage of people using their common sense during a pandemic. […]

    […] Cops were even overwhelmed by drunken revelers in SoHo and knocked to the ground. Wait, why wasn’t this immediately declared an unlawful assembly? Bumping into a cop is usually enough to do it during a Black Lives Matter protest.

    Sunday night’s celebrations could set the stage for a dramatic surge. Worse, the more contagious UK variant is quickly spreading through the state and is predicted to become the dominant strain by March 23. Yet, an estimated tens of thousands of people gathered Sunday night in Ybor City, a historic neighborhood that normally has a population of just 5,000 people. Ybor City is also predominantly Black and Hispanic, and Florida’s COVID-19 rates are twice as high in those communities.

    All this because of football? I can’t help feeling deflated.

    Link

  101. says

    From a discussion about the best Super Bowl ads:

    […] Disclosure: Amazon’s founder and chief executive, Jeff Bezos, also owns The Washington Post, and we are asking him to replace various aspects of our newsroom technology with Michael B. Jordan, as well.

    Background:

    You know those ads that are so great, you don’t even skip them on YouTube when given the option? Michael B. Jordan’s good looks do the heavy lifting here, given that he plays a “beautiful vessel” for Amazon’s virtual assistant, Alexa. Whenever the woman asks him a question, his eyes flash blue and he answers in a slow, seductive tone: “There are 16 tablespoons in a cup.” He takes his shirt off when she asks him to dim the lights. It’s ridiculous but the concept works […]

    Washington Post link

  102. says

    New York Times: Dying of Covid in a “Separate and Unequal” Los Angeles hospital:

    […] Emilio Virgen, 63, and Gabriel Flores, 50 — both died from Covid-19. Their stories were hauntingly familiar at Martin Luther King Jr. Community Hospital, by size the hardest-hit hospital in the hardest-hit county in the state now leading the nation in cases and on the brink of surpassing New York with the highest death toll. In the intensive care unit on Jan. 21, Mr. Virgen became No. 207 on the hospital’s list of Covid-19 fatalities; Mr. Flores, just down the hall, became No. 208. […]

    In the best of times, her small institution cannot match what many other hospitals offer, from caring for preemies to major heart attack victims. Now, amid the pandemic, the hospital can’t test experimental therapies, can’t draw on a large pool of specialized staff in a surge and can’t offer last-chance care on an external lung machine.

    During the peak, M.L.K. treated more Covid patients than some Los Angeles hospitals three to four times its size. While Dr. Batchlor emphasizes that her institution has learned to be nimble, she also says it has been overwhelmed. She has pleaded with the governor for help, tried to shame other institutions into accepting transfers of patients and spoken out about the failings of American health care.

    “We’ve created a separate and unequal hospital system and a separate and unequal funding system for low-income communities,” she said in an interview. “And now with Covid, we’re seeing the disproportionate impact.”

    […] While M.L.K. did not offer convalescent plasma to patients, it did have a similar, more targeted treatment: monoclonal antibodies. President Donald J. Trump received it last fall when he developed Covid, before the therapy gained federal emergency approval.

    It should be given when someone is mildly ill, not requiring oxygen or hospitalization, according to federal guidelines. M.L.K. has administered just over 140 doses to emergency room patients and found evidence that it reduced the chances they would return seriously ill, according to hospital data.

    But M.L.K. has not promoted community awareness of the therapy. “If we publicize it,” said Dr. K. Kevin Park, a vice president for medical affairs, “we wouldn’t be able to handle” the volume if many people showed up. The treatment requires an hourlong infusion and another hour of observation, creating additional demands for space and staff.

    Some other institutions in Los Angeles, including Cedars-Sinai, have given hundreds of doses. “Obese Hispanics with diabetes, they’re the ones that get really sick and they’re the ones you can help,” said Dr. Peter Chen, director of pulmonary and critical care medicine there, and the lead author of a journal article published last month reporting promising interim trial results for the treatment. Despite being safe and paid for by the federal government, the antibody regimen has not been widely adopted.

    […] One exception is Houston. The city’s largest medical system, Methodist, administered approximately 3,000 doses since late November, according to hospital officials, who scrambled to create specialized infusion centers throughout the region. They estimate that the drug helped prevent 300 hospitalizations and 30 deaths in Methodist’s system alone. “It feels like we’re starting to play offense,” said Vicki Brownewell, a vice president who oversees the program.

    But when Mr. Flores was experiencing symptoms early on, his worried wife could not even reach the physician he saw at a clinic offering low- or no-cost care. She was told the doctors were busy doing remote visits. “They had a long waiting list,” she said. “They hung up on me.”

    […] Covid that can require temporary dialysis to replace the work of the kidneys. M.L.K. had only three machines to deliver continuous dialysis, a form of the treatment used for the most unstable I.C.U. patients. That forced the hospital to prioritize whom to put on the machines — and for how long — and to manage other patients with medications.

    At U.C.L.A.’s flagship hospital, there was no such shortage. “It’s really amazing technology,” Dr. Gudzenko said. “It’s remarkable how differently you can practice medicine when you have enough resources.” […]

    NY Times link

  103. says

    This feels very 2010, but still…:

    BBC Woman’s Hour presenter asks first female Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain whether there are any female imams in Britain.

    The question is repeatedly dodged.

    “Inequality lead” at an NYU research center responds….by calling the *questioner* an Islamophobe….

    And now the “Inequality lead” is trying to get the Women’s Hour questioner in trouble at work… again, for asking if there is equality in woman’s spiritual leadership!

    Incredible.

    Links atl. In my view, Barnett asked a reasonable, factual question – How many female imams are there in the UK? – which could, possibly with some clarification, have simply been answered. A few minutes of googling suggests it’s an interesting topic on which there’s some variation.

  104. says

    Brian Kalt:

    Trump’s brief cites my 2001 article on late impeachment a lot:

    [NYT link atl; here’s the CNN link]

    The article favored late impeachability, but it set out all the evidence I found on both sides–lots for them to use.

    But in several places, they misrepresent what I wrote quite badly.

    One odd thing they do is cite me citing other sources instead of just citing those sources (e.g., p.17 & n.47). Another more problematic thing: they suggest that I was endorsing an argument when what I actually did was note that argument–and reject it (e.g., p.21 n.57).

    There are multiple examples of such flat-out misrepresentations. The worst is page 30. They write, “When a President is no longer in office, the objective of an impeachment ceases.”79

    N.79 starts: “Kalt at 66.”

    What I actually wrote on 66 (discussion continuing onto 67):

    [document atl]

    Again, my article presented all of the evidence I found on both sides, so there was lots for them to use fairly. They didn’t have to be disingenuous and misleading like this.

    The House managers’ brief cited my article a lot too and, to their credit, did so honestly.

  105. says

    Bellingcat – “How Instagram Celebrities Promote Dubai’s Underground Animal Trade”:

    The monkey squirms while a woman holds it up with one hand and records it without speaking. The TikTok video is brief and has no description; the only audio is the infant animal’s cooing. Other videos posted on related social media channels show young tigers, lions, cheetahs and pumas, but also monkeys, sloths, and meerkats, all recorded and shared without comment.

    While still young, these animals make their way to influencers and celebrities who use them as props in their own social media content. Rappers, movie stars, business magnates, TV-presenters, models, vloggers and even a fugitive criminal have all posted images of themselves posing with them. But there’s a problem — these same pets can be traced back to a small group of anonymous individuals who may be engaged in illegally leasing out, and perhaps even selling, exotic animals.

    This is a multi-million dollar industry. Much like cars and watches, exotic animals such as tigers have a long history of being used as status symbols, particularly in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

    However, keeping animals such as lions and tigers as ‘pets’ is problematic, causing harm to the animals’ physical and social well-being.

    It can also be illegal, sustaining poaching and international organised crime. In 2017, the UAE adopted a law that prohibits individuals from owning, trading or transporting dangerous or exotic animals such as primates and big cats, placing heavy restrictions on facilities such as zoos and breeding centres that keep them.

    Unfortunately, despite this law the trade continues. In social media posts to their millions of followers, celebrities continue to show off their tigers, cheetahs and monkeys. Those posts may provide illegal traders with free advertisement — but they also allow journalists to apply open-source techniques, revealing more about this shadowy trade.

    The use of social media platforms to trade in exotic animals, and the dangers of ‘cub-petting’ industries, are well-documented. But the direct link of celebrities and influencers to these practices is not. By posing with lion and tiger cubs and tagging these accounts, celebrities advertise a network engaged in the online trade in exotic animals to millions of followers. Some of these animals are brought out for photo shoots several times a month when still young, and end up being kept as a pet in private homes.

    Apart from potential legal issues and the well-being of the animals themselves, the trade in exotic animals puts already threatened wildlife populations at risk of poaching. Even when bred in captivity, experts warn, the use of such animals as status items fuels the trade. By pointing out the connections between Instagram photoshoots and this trade, fans and followers may make such posts less attractive, and help protect threatened wildlife populations.

    “Our team has recognised a change in behaviour online; more people are calling out exotic pet owners and more are aware of the negative impacts of owning a dangerous animal, to the individual keeping it, the community around it and the wild where the animal comes from”, explained Elsayed Mohamed, Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa for the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)….

    Much more atl. Not too big on humans today, I have to say.

  106. says

    Vice – “Hacker Tried to Poison Florida City’s Water Supply, Police Say”:

    On Monday officials from Pinellas County in Florida announced that an unidentified hacker remotely gained access to a panel that controls the City of Oldsmar’s water treatment system, and changed a setting that would have drastically increased the amount of sodium hydroxide in the water supply.

    During a press conference, Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri said that a legitimate operator saw the change and quickly reversed it, but signaled that the hacking attempt was a serious threat to the city’s water supply. Sodium hydroxide is also known as lye and can be deadly if ingested in large amounts.

    “The hacker changed the sodium hydroxide from about one hundred parts per million, to 11,100 parts per million,” Gualtieri said, adding that these were “dangerous” levels. When asked if this should be considered an attempt at bioterrorism, Gualtieri said, “What it is is someone hacked into the system not just once but twice … opened the program and changed the levels from 100 to 11,100 parts per million with a caustic substance. So, you label it however you want, those are the facts.”

    In smaller quantities, sodium hydroxide can cause severe skin burns and eye damage. Small amounts of sodium hydroxide are put in some cities’ drinking water supplies to prevent corrosion to pipes and to bring the pH up (it is a strong base).

    The news highlights what could be a serious cyber and physical security breach, and raises questions about how secure access to such a sensitive system really was.

    …Gualtieri said that steps were taken to “stop further remote access to the system” and that there are other safeguards to protect the water integrity in place.

    The County Sheriff’s office has started a criminal investigation along with the FBI and the Secret Service, Gualtieri said….

  107. says

    NBC News:

    Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced Monday that the U.S. is rejoining the United Nations Human Rights Council, reversing yet another of the Trump administration’s moves to exit multilateral organizations and pacts.

    NBC News:

    GOP Reps. Louie Gohmert and Andrew Clyde were fined $5,000 for bypassing newly-installed metal detectors as they entered the House floor, a senior Democratic aide told NBC News on Friday.

    Gohmert and Clyde announced their intention to appeal the sanctions.

  108. says

    Trump’s lawyers want you to believe his pre-insurrection speech was focused on election security and peaceful protest. The article is written by Aaron Rupar.

    Excerpt:

    […] To hear Trump’s lawyers tell it, just before the insurrection, Trump delivered a speech to his followers in which he focused on election security issues and urged them to remain calm and peaceful. Because he did not explicitly direct them to commit crimes, and because a few of the rioters may not have been supporters of his, they argue, the Senate must acquit.

    “Words do matter and the words of President Trump’s January 6th speech speak for themselves,” the brief states. “President Trump did not direct anyone to commit lawless actions.”

    That sounds nice, but it doesn’t capture what actually happened on January 6. In reality, the main theme of Trump’s speech was the need to “fight like hell” in hopes of stopping Congress from certifying his Electoral College loss to now-President Joe Biden — an effort that culminated in a mob of his supporters overrunning law enforcement officers in a riot that ultimately claimed five lives and nearly allowed rioters to lay hands on members of Congress who fled the House and Senate chambers under duress. […]

    More, including video, at the link.

  109. says

    Wonkette:

    Rep. Liz Cheney isn’t sorry.

    She’s not apologizing, she’s not backing down, and she’s certainly not taking shit from those pathetic Freedom Caucus wankers Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan, who staged that disastrous vote last week to try to get her booted from her position as GOP Conference Chair.

    Axios reports that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy asked Cheney to apologize before last Wednesday’s caucus meeting, “suggest[ing] it could sway some of her opponents.” But Dick Cheney’s daughter did one better than that — she actually counted the votes, so she knew she was going to kick Beavis and Butthead’s whiny little asses with at least 142 members supporting her, apology or no.

    Why it never occurred to McCarthy, who served as Majority Whip between 2011 and 2014 to actually, you know, whip the votes is unclear. But Liz Cheney’s not A IDIOT, so she cowgirled up and got it done.

    Cheney was censured by her own state’s GOP this weekend for daring to say mean words about Donald Trump, and yet she persisted. ([…] we know she’s no Liz Warren. But it’s no coincidence that Republicans have decided to blame one of the few women in their caucus for Trump’s disgraceful behavior.)

    “Well, I think you have to read the language of the censure partly. I think, you know, that people in the party are mistaken. They believe that BLM and Antifa were behind what happened here at the Capitol,” Cheney told Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday. “It’s just simply not the case, not true […]”

    “People have been lied to. The extent to which the president, President Trump for months leading up to January 6th, spread the notion that the election had been stolen or that the election was rigged was a lie and people need to understand that,” she continued. “We need to make sure that we as Republicans are the party of truth that we are being honest about what really did happen in 2020 so we actually have a chance to win in 2022 and win the White House back in 2024.”

    And then she kicked her pal Kevin in the gonads for failing to even bring Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s committee seats up for a vote that day when he was hanging her out to dry before the caucus.

    CHENEY: Look, I think that, first of all, with respect to Congressman Greene, we’ve all been very clear. The things that she has said don’t have any place in our public discourse and we as a Republican conference should deal with that issue. We should have dealt with it. That’s not something the Democrats should be addressing on the floor of the House, we should have dealt with that.

    And lest there be any doubt whom Cheney referred to, she added later, “It should not have gotten to the point that it did. I don’t believe the Democrats have any business determining who from the Republicans sit on committees, but we should have dealt with it ourselves.”

    “We” need to do better, KEVIN.

    And then Cheney reverted to form, first veering off into fantasyland about her own party — “we are the party of responsibility, we are the party of truth, that we actually can be trusted to handle the challenges this nation faces like COVID and that’s going to require us to focus on substance and policy and issues going forward” — and then attacking Joe Biden for murdering all the people who make their living pulling dead dinosaurs out of the ground to melt the ice caps with.

    CHENEY: [I]t’s heartbreaking in many ways, Chris, because, you know, we watched the inaugural speech where he spoke of unity, where he spoke of trying to work together in the immediate actions we’ve seen with respect to, you know, things like canceling the Keystone pipeline, it’s heartless. It really is. The people that are being put out of work, when you look at the ban on additional permits for oil and gas leasing on public lands — you know, my state of Wyoming not only is absolutely devastating to our energy industry, but the resources that come from those leases are what we used to fund our schools. It’s what we used to fund services in our local communities.

    Because if you can’t exploit public lands to destroy the climate for private benefit (sparing your state the annoying obligation to raise taxes to fund your own children’s education), then the terrorists win.

    Don’t worry, Your Wonkette isn’t turning into a Liz Cheney fan page. We know she’s evil. But at least the representative is competent! And if the GOP wants to kick the shit out of each other, who are we to complain?

    Link

  110. Prax says

    Lynna @138,

    https://missoulacurrent.com/government/2021/02/voter-registration/

    “Let’s be the ones today who say, `Election officials, we just made your job a little bit easier on Election Day,’” said Rep. Sharon Greef, R-Florence, who sponsored the bill. “And fellow Montanans, we just shortened the lines at your polling place.”

    How is this not satirical? “Your polling place will have shorter lines because you won’t be in them! Election officials can kick back and relax now that elections…aren’t.”

    “And those nonprofit groups — and they were not on our side of the aisle — what they were doing?” he said. “When they were 30 feet from the building, they were working all of those people with literature, pizza, heat lamps, and everything else.”

    This is…it’s perfect. Representative Jedediah Hinkle is outraged that nonprofits were providing all the voters with food, warmth (it was nine degrees below freezing that night) and “literature”. Campaign literature? Who knows. It’s scandalous enough that those people feel entitled to read things.

    And to remedy this terrible injustice he wants to — have organizations on his side feed and warm everybody too? haha, no — ban same-day registration. Checkmate, libs! Good luck nourishing the masses while they’re trudging home and mourning their disenfranchisement! Yes, I am banking on an impressed Satan hiring me out of hell!

  111. blf says

    Squawking bird blows the whistle on fake video trying to tilt Ecuador election:

    […]
    An attempt to influence the Ecuadorian elections with a fake video purportedly showing leftwing guerrillas endorsing one of the candidates was thwarted by a ground-dwelling bird and a keen-eared ornithologist.

    In the video, shared on social media before the election’s first round on Sunday, three masked and armed men stood before the red and black flag of the ELN — Colombia’s largest remaining guerrilla force — and expressed their support for the leftist candidate Andrés Arauz.

    A caption at the foot of the screen described the setting as the Colombian jungle, but a shrill whistle from somewhere in the shrub gave the game away.

    “I recognised the whistle instantly and I knew that the video could not have been filmed in Colombia,” said Manuel Sánchez, an ornithologist and bird guide. He had identified the avian whistleblower as a pale-browed tinamou — which is not native to Colombia.

    […] “It was just luck that this particular species lives in a very small and rare dry forest ecosystem in western Ecuador and north-west Peru.” Although the ELN have previously operated in northern Ecuador, there is no record of activity in those ecosystem areas.

    Spelling mistakes, strange accents and unlikely weaponry further undermined the authenticity of the video […]. The ELN denies the claim and disavowed the video.

    […]

    Sánchez hopes the attention his own tweets have brought will draw international attention to the plight of the pale-browed tinamou’s habitat. “The Tumbesian dry forest we share with Peru is one of the most threatened ecosystems in the Americas, due to the growth of the shrimping industry, agriculture and roads,” he said.

    […]

  112. blf says

    Black Robe Pastor Wore Oath Keepers T-Shirt at Trump Prayer Rally in December: We Are the Government of America:

    [… Virginia pastor Bill] Cook said that all legitimate governments are based in the lordship of Jesus Christ and that Christians are called to govern. […]

    Cook wore an Oath Keepers T-shirt while speaking at the Dec 12 [Stop the Steal prayer rally]. On the same stage later that day, Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes threatened bloody civil war if Trump did not stay in power. […]

    Cook founded a group called America’s Black Robe Regiment. The black robe regiment, often invoked by Christian nationalist leaders who want to get conservative pastors more involved in right-wing politics, refers to Colonial-era pastors who mobilized men in their churches to join the war for independence from England.

    Historian John Fea responded to Cook’s [bugfeckery …], “There was no such thing as the ‘black robe regiment’ in revolutionary America.” Fea noted that Cook [said] everything he knew about the black robe regiment he learned from religious-right “historian” David Barton. Like Right Wing Watch, Fea has spent years challenging Barton’s “false claims and misleading interpretations of American history.” Barton’s book about Thomas Jefferson was pulled by his Christian publisher after many historians complained about its inaccuracies.

    [… examples of Cook’s nonsense…]

    There were several clergymen in the first Congress. So, what is this separation of church and state? Cook asked. Why are we dutifully complying with something called the Johnson Amendment when we know its purpose was to silence the pulpits of America?

    [… another example of Cook’s nonsense…]

    According to Cook’s website, his group was launched in 2012 at Patrick Henry College with the help of retired Lt Gen Jerry Boykin, executive vice president at the Family Research Council, and EW Jackson, a religious-right activist who was the Republican nominee for Lt Gov of Virginia in 2013. Also on the speaker’s list were Michael Farris, founder of the Home School Legal Defense Association and Patrick Henry College and now head of the religious-right legal giant Alliance Defending Freedom, and John Guandolo, an anti-Muslim activist who said the day after the Capitol Insurrection that the rioters had shown restraint by not executing the traitors in Congress.

    In 2018, Cook took part in a rally by anti-LGBTQ activists protesting the marriage equality ruling handed down by the Supreme Court three years earlier. [… H]e called on pastors to be more political and disobey restrictions on electoral politicking by churches and other tax-exempt nonprofit groups […]

  113. says

    Reuters – “New Zealand suspends ties with Myanmar; to ban visits from military leaders”:

    New Zealand is suspending all high-level contact with Myanmar and imposing a travel ban on its military leaders following last week’s coup, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said on Tuesday.

    New Zealand will also ensure its aid programme will not include projects that are delivered with, or benefit, the military government, Ardern told a news conference.

    “Our strong message is we will do what we can from here in New Zealand and one of things we will do is suspend that high level dialogue…and make sure any funding we put into Myanmar does not in any way support the military regime,” Ardern said.

    New Zealand’s aid programme was worth about NZ$42 million ($30 million) between 2018 and 2021, she said.

    New Zealand does not recognise the legitimacy of the military-led government and called on the military to immediately release all detained political leaders and restore civilian rule, Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta said in a separate statement.

    Mahuta said the government has also agreed to implement a travel ban, to be formalised in the coming week, on Myanmar’s military leaders….

  114. says

    Guardian – “Germany, Poland and Sweden expel Russian diplomats”:

    Germany, Poland and Sweden have each expelled a Russian diplomat in a coordinated act of retaliation over the expulsion of three EU officials by Moscow while the bloc’s foreign policy chief was visiting last week.

    The tit-for-tat expulsions on Monday underscored the volatility in east-west relations and an erosion of trust among former cold war foes, as the west accuses Moscow of trying to destabilise it and the Kremlin rejects what it sees as foreign interference.

    The EU executive defended Josep Borrell over his trip to Russia where he said he had learned of the initial expulsions via social media while speaking with the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, on Friday.

    During the official visit, Borrell and Lavrov gave a news conference at which the Russian minister described the EU as “an unreliable partner” and the Spaniard praised Russia’s Covid-19 vaccine.

    Borrell had gone to Moscow to seek Navalny’s release and to try to relaunch EU-Russia relations, but in the blogpost he said Friday’s news conference had been “aggressively staged” and the trip had been “very complicated”.

    “Russia is progressively disconnecting itself from Europe and looking at democratic values as an existential threat,” wrote Borrell. “It will be for member states to decide the next steps, and yes, these could include sanctions.”

  115. says

    Here’s a link to the February 9 Guardian coronavirus world liveblog.

    From there:

    The US is to shift its status in a World Health Organization programme to boost Covid-19 testing, diagnostics and vaccines from observer to participant after isolationism under Donald Trump, an official told a WHO meeting.

    “We want to underscore the commitment of the United States to multilateralism and our common cause to respond this pandemic and improve global public health,” said Colin McIff, acting director at the Office of Global Affairs in the US Department of Health and Human Services.

    The meeting in Geneva aims to help fill a $27 billion funding gap for the WHO-backed programme, called the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator Facilitation Council, that is aimed at broadening global access to Covid-19 fighting tools.

  116. says

    Rep. Pressley:

    A man died from COVID in a Houston jail cell last week because he couldn’t afford the $100 bail. He died for the crime of being poor, awaiting trial for the alleged crime of stealing food.

    His name was Preston Chaney.

    Mass incarceration is a public health crisis.

  117. says

    At least one semi-intelligent and sometimes-responsible Republican, Adam Kinzinger from Illinois is speaking out:

    [He] wrote a new Washington Post op-ed, making the case for convicting the former president.

    [T]his isn’t a waste of time. It’s a matter of accountability. If the GOP doesn’t take a stand, the chaos of the past few months, and the past four years, could quickly return. The future of our party and our country depends on confronting what happened — so it doesn’t happen again.

    Kinzinger has been working his way toward this point for a while. After months of urging his party to be responsible, the Illinois Republican seemed to adopt an even more assertive posture in the wake of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. When House Democratic leaders, for example, pushed a resolution calling on then-Vice President Mike Pence and the White House cabinet to remove Donald Trump from office, Kinzinger was literally the only GOP member to vote for it.

    Soon after, reflecting on his vote to impeach his party’s president, the Illinois congressman conceded that he was prepared to sacrifice his political career over the underlying principles.

    And now, Kinzinger is taking a rather unreserved approach to Trump’s culpability.

    The immediate cause for Trump’s impeachment was Jan. 6. But the president’s rally and resulting riot on Capitol Hill didn’t come out of nowhere. They were the result of four-plus years of anger, outrage and outright lies. Perhaps the most dangerous lie — or at least the most recent — was that the election was stolen. Of course it wasn’t, but a huge number of Republican leaders encouraged the belief that it was. Every time that lie was repeated, the riots of Jan. 6 became more likely.

    He added that many Republicans, even now, “refuse to admit what happened,” and feed on the anger that led to the deadly Jan. 6 attack.

    “Impeachment offers a chance to say enough is enough,” Kinzinger went on to argue. “It ought to force every American, regardless of party affiliation, to remember not only what happened on Jan. 6, but also the path that led there. After all, the situation could get much, much worse — with more violence and more division that cannot be overcome. The further down this road we go, the closer we come to the end of America as we know it.”

    He added, “I firmly believe the majority of Americans — Republican, Democrat, independent, you name it — reject the madness of the past four years. But we’ll never move forward by ignoring what happened or refusing to hold accountable those responsible. That will embolden the few who led us here and dishearten the many who know America is better than this.”

    Kinzinger concluded that a Senate vote to convict Trump would help “save America from going further down a sad, dangerous road.”

    It’s possible that some will see an op-ed like this and reflexively assume that Kinzinger is a rare Republican moderate, and perhaps even someone who’d consider switching parties.

    That’s not quite right. While the Illinois congressman clearly seems concerned about the GOP’s direction, let’s not forget the fact that Kinzinger voted with Trump’s position in recent years more than 90% of the time. When he launched his career, the Republican welcomed the support of Sarah Palin and Tea Party groups.

    Those on the left looking to Kinzinger as an ally on substantive issues are likely to be disappointed.

    But the fact remains that the congressman appears to still care about principles and recognizes the dangers posed by Trump. There’s no reason to assume Senate Republicans will even read Kinzinger’s recommendations, especially as they relate to this week’s impeachment trial, but his is a perspective his party ought to take seriously

    Link

  118. says

    AP – “Justice Dept. seeks resignations of Trump-era US attorneys”:

    The Justice Department will ask U.S. attorneys who were appointed by former President Donald Trump to resign from their posts, as the Biden administration moves to transition to its own nominees, a senior Justice Department official said Monday.

    But the U.S. attorney overseeing the federal tax probe involving Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, will remain in place. The acting attorney general, Monty Wilkinson, called U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who runs the federal prosecutor’s office in Delaware, and asked him to remain on the job, the official said.

    The Justice Department has been investigating the finances of Hunter Biden, including scrutinizing some of his Chinese business dealings and other transactions. The tax investigation was launched in 2018, the year before the elder Biden announced his candidacy for president. Hunter Biden confirmed the existence of the investigation in December after a round of subpoenas was issued in the case.

    The Associated Press has reported that the subpoena seeking documents from Hunter Biden in December asked for information related to more than two dozen entities, including Ukraine gas company Burisma.

    Separately, U.S. Attorney John Durham, who was appointed in October by then-Attorney General William Barr as a special counsel to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, will remain in that capacity, the senior Justice Department official said, but is expected to resign from his other position as the U.S. attorney in Connecticut.

    The transition process, which happens routinely between administrations, is expected to take weeks and would apply to a few dozen U.S. attorneys who were appointed by Trump and confirmed by the Senate. Many of the federal prosecutors who were nominated by Trump have already left their positions, some in recent weeks.

    The Senate has yet to schedule a confirmation hearing for Biden’s attorney general nominee, Merrick Garland, a federal appeals court judge who in 2016 was snubbed by Republicans for a seat on the Supreme Court….

  119. says

    As Trump’s second impeachment trial is set to begin, here’s an update on the current state of affairs:

    […] Does Trump have much of a defense? The former president’s latest legal defense team — he’s gone through a few — filed its first trial brief with the Senate last week, and it was a mess. Those same attorneys filed a revised trial brief yesterday, and by some measures, it was worse.

    The document is filled with strange factual errors; it constructs “an alternative reality” of what transpired on and around Jan. 6; and it relies heavily on the work of a law school professor who has publicly explained that Trump’s lawyers have “badly” misrepresented his work and engaged in “flat-out misrepresentations.”

    See SC’s comment 146.

    What’s more, much of the Republican’s defense rests on the idea that the Senate shouldn’t even be allowed to consider the case because Trump is now a private citizen, which is (a) rather ironic, since GOP senators wouldn’t allow the trial to proceed while Trump was still in office; and (b) badly at odds with the historical record, since there is precedent for impeachment trials against those who are no longer in office.

    What would it take to convict Trump in this case? If every member of the Senate Democratic conference votes to convict the former president at the end of the trial — which seems likely — they would need to be joined by 17 Senate Republicans.

    Is that likely? At this point, no. It’s not inconceivable that some GOP senators will consider the evidence and vote to convict, but many Republicans freely insist that their minds are already made up, and they’re prepared to stick with their disgraced former president.

    […] If there’s no conviction, can Congress still vote to bar Trump from seeking elected office again? Probably not, but there may be another possible avenue. Keep reading.

    Is there a backup plan if Trump is ultimately acquitted? [I think “acquitted” is the wrong word.] A couple of weeks ago, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), fairly certain that a conviction was impossible, started pursuing a censure resolution as an alternative. He gave up soon after when members of both parties expressed little interest.

    That said, McClatchy News reported yesterday that Democrats may revisit the issue after the trial, hoping that it might be able to serve as a vehicle to barring Trump from holding future office.

    Link

  120. says

    Follow-up to SC’s comment 167.

    […] When it comes to Durham and Weiss, there seems to be little reason to carry on with investigations that were started for little more than to provide Trump with talking points in his campaign. At this point, Durham’s investigation into the origins and prosecution of the Russia investigation has been going on longer than the investigation itself. His report has been promised, multiple times, in the past, but has constantly been delayed. The unbounded investigation has gone so far afield as to delve into the finances of the Clinton Foundation, and has looked at some of the most head-slappingly silly parts of the Q conspiracy. That includes claims that the professor who first talked to George Papadopoulos about connecting the Trump campaign with Russian officials was actually a CIA plant put in place to bring down Trump years before he even ran.

    In all of this extremely long-running and extensive investigation, Durham has managed to land just a single charge. That charge went against FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith and appears to be more of a matter of Clinesmith simply getting lazy and signing off on a statement without fully investigating whether Trump adviser Carter Page was actually working with the CIA. That’s all Durham and former attorney general William Barr have to show for their efforts. In comparison, the Mueller investigation indicted 34 individuals and three Russian businesses in far less time. Those charges led to seven guilty pleas and five people sentenced to prison—most of whom were later pardoned by Donald Trump.

    Over the course of Durham’s investigation, even his top assistant called it quits. She had worked with Durham for decades and was recruited back from private practice specifically to work on this investigation. But after deciding that Durham was being pressured by Barr to come up with something Trump could use in his reelection campaign, she resigned. Not only has Durham failed to produce anything of substance, it’s unclear that he’s even working on anything.

    On Weiss’ investigation of Hunter Biden’s taxes, the approach seems to be simply overkill. As the Associated Press reported in December, the investigation into the tax filings of President Biden’s surviving son appears to date back to 2018—the same time that Rudy Giuliani was helping to spread lies about the actions of father and son Bidens in Ukraine. The scope of the actual concern appears to be unclear, and Hunter Biden himself was unaware of the investigation until after the election.

    Wilkinson, or soon-to-be Attorney General Merrick Garland, should instruct Durham to wrap it up and file a report. It seems clear that “Bull” Durham hasn’t managed to find anything other than bull when it comes to finding criminal intent behind the Russia investigation. It’s time to simply admit that and go home.

    On Weiss, there may be reasons to continue the investigation—not because it involves Hunter Biden, but because it seems to involve ploys by Chinese companies. However, over two years is a long time to dig into someone’s taxes. Weiss may not be able to go forward with the case he wants at this point, but he should certainly be able to either indict or absolve Hunter Biden.

    In any case, no one in the Biden White House should expect to receive any credit for allowing Durham and Weiss to stay on. At this point, any investigation that doesn’t end with every Democratic politician lining up to visit the gallows that insurrectionists raised outside the Capitol is going to be looked on by the right as just another sign of the “deep state.”

    […] both Bidens have already been convicted in the court of Donald Trump’s mind […]

    Link

  121. blf says

    Palm Beach council to decide whether Trump can live at Mar-a-Lago:

    […]
    The council will hear their attorney’s opinion on whether it can stop Trump living at his club. Nearly 30 years ago, in 1993, a Trump lawyer told the town the New York property magnate would be prohibited from living at Mar-a-Lago, if the town allowed him to convert it from a residence to a club.

    The promise, however, was not included in a written agreement which may now take precedence.

    Technically, Trump is an employee of the corporation that owns Mar-a-Lago — and the written agreement only bars members from living there. Under town regulations, a club can provide onsite housing to employees. […]

    […]

    In 1993, Trump and the town agreed he could turn the estate into a private club limited to 500 members. The initiation fee is now $200,000. Annual dues are $14,000. Members can stay for no more than seven consecutive days and 21 days a year — but there is no prohibition on employees living there.

    According to Palm Beach Post articles from 1993, Trump’s attorney Paul Rampell told the town council that Trump would be treated like any other member.

    “Another question that’s often asked to me is whether Mr Trump will continue to live at Mar-a-Lago,” Rampell said. “No, except that he will be a member of the club and therefore will be entitled to the use of guest rooms.”

    The length of Trump’s stays at Mar-a-Lago before his presidency are unknown, but they often exceeded seven days while he was in office and added up to more than 21 days a year.

    Trump clashed frequently with the town before he became president. Neighbors complained about noise, traffic and a car lot-sized US flag and its 80ft pole, which Trump erected in 2006 without proper permits. Trump got a shorter pole and agreed to have his foundation give $100,000 to veteran charities.

    He then put the pole on a mound, so it would still rise to 80ft.

    […]

  122. says

    David Corn:

    […] despite the the deja-vu-ness of this been-there/done-that impeachment and the absence of a possible political death sentence, the second Trump impeachment is far more important than the first, for it ultimately is about securing and protecting the defining ideal of the United States: that this nation is a democracy that honors principle not power.

    [In the first impeachment, Trump was accused of attempting] to use his office improperly to gain a political advantage. Operating like a Mafia don, Trump leaned on the newly elected president of Ukraine to launch a phony investigation that would target Joe Biden and another bogus probe that would essentially clear Moscow of the proven charge it had intervened in the 2016 election to help Trump.

    The first impeachment fixed on this one discrete act, which was chronicled by a smoking-gun quasi-transcript of the call between Trump and the Ukrainian leader. With this evidence in their mitts, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democratic leaders of that chamber opted to not pursue a wider impeachment charge against Trump. In his final report, Special Counsel Robert Mueller had offered a detailed roadmap for an impeachment case based on several alleged acts of obstruction of justice related to the Trump-Russia investigation. Yet the Democrats favored a skinny approach: focus on one obvious instance of an abuse of power. It was much like a prosecutor attempting to nab a crime boss by concentrating on a single illegal act for which the proof was rock-solid. Trump was not impeached for his overall assault on the rule of law. His Ukraine caper, though, did evince his dangerous authoritarian impulses, his desire to inappropriately (if not illegally) influence an election, his debasement of the office of the president, and the threat he posed to democratic stability. […]

    The core issue [in Impeachment #2] is a president jeopardizing American democracy. For the first time since the republic was born, the United States did not experience a peaceful transfer of power following a presidential election. […] Trump spent weeks prior to the election plotting how to subvert it should he lose, and then he put his scheme in motion, pushing the big lie that massive fraud had occurred and a nefarious cabal had stolen his victory. He falsely declared victory before all the votes were counted. He and his allies refused to accept legitimate and certified results, filing frivolous lawsuits that were routinely tossed out […] They lied—over and over—about vote tallies and supposed irregularities that did not exist. It was a psyop campaign, information warfare—similar to the covert attack waged against the 2016 election by Vladimir Putin. And evoking his infamous Ukraine phone conversation, Trump called Georgia state officials and pressured them to “find” him just enough votes to secure a victory in that state. Coercing local officials to falsify election results can be a crime.

    This all happened before the seditious and murderous attack on the US Capitol on January 6. […]

    [The second impeachment trial is not] only about Trump’s effort that day to pressure Pence to take the unconstitutional step of blocking that certification. Trump’s disgraceful actions on January 6 were the endgame of a conspiracy against the United States he had been pursuing for months.

    Trump had betrayed the nation—as he had before. (See the COVID pandemic.) He had sought to delegitimize an election. He had encouraged a violent insurrection. He did nothing at first when domestic terrorists assaulted Congress. […] even if Trump is now out of office, his impeachment and trial remain vitally necessary. His attempt to undermine democracy demands investigation and judgment. […] Tump-incited horrific event that merits further investigation by Congress and other bodies.

    [Trump] ended his term as an enemy of the state. Whatever Trump’s political future, this will become an impossible-to-undo part of his brand—a disgraceful foe of constitutional government.

    Trump is the first president to threaten American democracy in such a direct, profound, and violent manner. And this impeachment is no retread. It may lack suspense. It may seem to some as a going-through-the-motions exercise with an easy-to-predict conclusion. It may cut against the sentiment of those who want to move past Trump. But Trump committed one of the greatest political crimes in American history, and that deserves a full reckoning—for now and for the future.

    Link

  123. says

    Bits and pieces of news:

    […]
    * True to form, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) launched a new fundraising drive yesterday, asking supporters to send him more money because the Senate is holding another impeachment trial for Donald Trump.

    […] * With just nine months remaining before Election Day in Virginia, the Associated Press took a closer look yesterday at state Sen. Amanda Chase, one of the Republican Party’s top gubernatorial candidates: “In an interview, Chase declined to disavow QAnon, questioned her colleagues’ mental health after they questioned hers in floor speeches last week and refused to say that Trump lost the November election…. In December, she called on Trump to declare martial law rather than leave office.” [Another one of those!]

    * Disgraced former Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens (R) hinted last week that he might take on incumbent Sen. Roy Blunt (R) in a primary next year, arguing that the incumbent senator isn’t far enough to the right.

    * On a related note, Roy Blunt picked up a Democratic rival yesterday, with former Missouri state Sen. Scott Sifton (D) launching his statewide bid. Blunt was re-elected in 2016 by only three points […]

    * And on the heels of his nine-point defeat four months ago, former Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) is taking steps to remain politically relevant, joining the board of the National Victory Action Fund (NVAF), new super PAC that hopes to elect more congressional Republicans.

    Link

  124. says

    Guardian world liveblog:

    Two new Covid variants, one of which has been classified as a “concern”, have been identified in England with some similarities to the South African and Brazilian variants, a government advisory scientific committee said.

    One of the new variants, first identified in Bristol, has been designated a “Variant of Concern”, by the “New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group”. The other, first identified in Liverpool, has been designated as a “Variant under Investigation” by the group.

    The new variants have the E484K mutation, which occurs on the spike protein of the virus, which is the same change as has been seen in the South African and Brazilian variants that have caused international concern. Public Health England has now identified 76 cases of the new variants, and is confident that vaccines will work against them, Reuters reports.

    Yeah, “Variant of Concern” isn’t a phrase I wanted to see today.

  125. blf says

    From the Grauniad’s current failed insurrection live blog:

    […]
    The election arm of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), has brought out its final report on the US presidential election, concluding that it was well organised under the circumstances and there was no significant fraud.

    The report also found that Donald Trump’s rhetoric and refusal to accept defeat undermined public faith in democratic institutions, and warned the US has long-term problems with providing equal voting rights for all.

    As is routine for OSCE member states, its Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) sent a team out to observe the run-up, election day itself and the aftermath. Its report notes that voting infrastructure in the US is chronically underfunded, and the extra $400m disbursed to deal with the challenge of voting in a pandemic was insufficient.

    […]

    One of the main problems with the election and its aftermath, according to the findings, was the incumbent president [sic].

    “On many occasions, President [sic] Trump created an impression of refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, claiming that the electoral process was systematically rigged,” the report said.

    “Such statements by an incumbent president [sic] weaken public confidence in state institutions and were perceived by many as increasing the potential for politically motivated violence after the elections.”

    […]

    The ODIHR was most scathing about the state of voting rights in the US. It notes that after the supreme court invalidated key parts of the Voting Rights Act, “some states enacted laws which effectively compromised voting rights for some disadvantaged groups”.

    An estimated 5.2 million citizens are effectively disenfranchised due to a criminal conviction, even though half have served their sentences.

    The report concluded: “These restrictions on the voting rights of ex-felons and felons contravene principles of universal suffrage and the principle of proportionality in the restriction of rights, as provided for by OSCE commitments and other international standards.”

  126. says

    Right out of the gate, Raskin is showing clips of Trump’s speech interspersed with clips of the siege and clips of McConnell speaking against the attempts to refuse to certify the election results. It’s going on for several minutes. He introduced it by saying if there’s no accountability for what Trump did, we open ourselves up for more of this in the future.

  127. says

    Guardian world liveblog:

    The Navajo Nation’s vaccination rollout continues to surpass the broader United States, Al Jazeera reports, having distributed 94 per cent of the doses it has received.

    It announced on Tuesday that it will receive a further 29,000 Covid-19 vaccine doses.

    Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez said that the Navajo Area Indian Health Service (NAIHS) had delivered 74,048 of the 78,520 vaccine doses it had received by Sunday.

    CDC figures show the broader US has administered 71 percent of its available doses as of Monday.

    According to the latest figures on its website, the Navajo Nation has administered 55,671 doses, with 7,395 people fully immunised (having received two doses).

  128. blf says

    Feck feck feck… According to France’s track-and-trace app, the ICU occupancy rate in the general area where I live is now 98% (in France as-a-whole it’s 66%). Vaccination started in France at the very end of last year — but to-date slightly less than 2m people(? jabs?) have been given. That total is only slightly more than the daily number for the (post-hair furor) States.

  129. says

    Trump’s attorney’s are trying to cast the entire impeachment trial as a partisan exercise that is not constitutionally legitimate. They don’t have a leg to stand on.

  130. blf says

    The Grauniad — and Rachel Maddow — are in full-snark mode about Mr Castor, Esq, presentation… from the current impeachment ][ live blog:

    The beginning of Bruce Castor’s presentation seemed to be mostly him rambling, which did not escape the attention of those watching the impeachment trial.

    […]

    Castor, who is leading Donald Trump’s defense team, spent several minutes explaining how senators are different than other Americans. It was very unclear how that issue relates to whether the impeachment trial is constitutional.

    […]

    Ms Maddow:

    Is Mr. Castor just… ad libbing?

    Ever have one of those nightmares where it’s your time to talk and everybody’s looking at you, but you haven’t prepared anything?

    I’ve had that nightmare a million times, but never once where the amount of time I had to tread water and ad lib and fail and flail was **four hours**.

    (I still haven’t seen an image of Mr Castor, Esq‘s, “Zoot suit” (@185). The mildly deranged penguin tried a Zoot suit a few times. It didn’t work for her, either.)

  131. says

    Away from DC, Republicans aren’t ‘moving on’ from Capitol attack

    In D.C., Republicans say they want to “move on” from the events of Jan. 6. At the state level, it’s a very different story.

    Nikki Haley recently appeared on Fox News to argue against holding Donald Trump accountable for inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Though the former ambassador to the United Nations was willing to say the former president’s actions were “not great,” Haley soon added, “I mean, give the man a break. I mean, move on.”

    Around the same time, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) also appeared on Fox News and used similar phrasing. “[T]o coin a phrase, I think it’s time to move on,” the Republican senator said. “It’s time to move on.”

    Most Republicans in D.C. have adopted the same posture: the attack was a whole month ago, and Trump’s no longer in office, so why make a fuss about the former president attacking our democracy, trying to subvert our electoral process, and dispatching a violent mob on the Capitol?

    At the state level, Republicans aren’t just resisting the idea that the political world should “move on”; they’re still acting on the ridiculous idea that Trump’s Big Lie is true.

    In Nevada, for example, the state Republican Party is urging the public to call into state legislative meetings featuring Barbara Cegavske — Nevada’s Republican secretary of state, to ask why “no official is investigating illegal votes in Nevada.”

    In Michigan, it’s worse.

    Six Trump supporters from Michigan have been arrested in connection with the storming of the Capitol. One, a former Marine accused of beating a Capitol Police officer with a hockey stick, had previously joined armed militiamen in a protest organized by Michigan Republicans to try to disrupt ballot counting in Detroit. The chief organizer of that protest, Meshawn Maddock, on Saturday was elected co-chair of the state Republican Party — one of four die-hard Trump loyalists who won top posts.

    And in Arizona, it’s worse still.

    In a surprise move Monday, the Arizona Senate voted to not hold the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in contempt for failing to turn over voting machines and ballots from the November election. The vote was expected to pass with a Republican majority, but GOP Rep. Paul Boyer voted against the resolution, evening the tallies at 15 each and killing the resolution. If the vote would have passed, the five-member board consisting of just one Democrat could have been subject to immediate arrest.

    If you missed last night’s show, Rachel explained this story in unsettling detail, and it’s every bit as ridiculous as it seems. A group of GOP state legislators were prepared to have local officials in Arizona’s largest county arrested because they, in accordance with the law, protected ballots and voting machines from political interference.

    […] one Republican state senator responded by suggesting the public may take matters into their own hands. “So, public, do what you gotta do,” state Sen. Kelly Townsend (R) said.

    In too many instances, it doesn’t appear that Republicans are looking to “move on” from the events of Jan. 6; it appears they’re eager to build on the toxicity that led to the violent attack.

    Republicans are still encouraging the public to engage in violence.

  132. says

    Is Mr. Castor just… ad libbing?

    Ever have one of those nightmares where it’s your time to talk and everybody’s looking at you, but you haven’t prepared anything?

    It’s really weird! And it’s not really connected to any of the Constitutional questions at issue.

    I think he now just gratuitously insulted Sen. Sasse, who’s…a juror.

  133. says

    Follow-up to blf @188, and SC @189.

    Matt Shuham:

    Trump attorney Bruce Castor began his remarks Tuesday by referring to himself as the “lead prosecutor” in the impeachment case, and it didn’t get much better from there.

    Over several minutes of asides and diversions, Castor opened Trump’s defense by discussing how record players work, the quality of the late Sen. Everett McKinley Dirksen’s (R-IL) voice, the difference between murder and manslaughter, and how all senators are fundamentally “patriots first.”

    Chris Hayes:

    Trump’s lawyer’s presentation is almost physically difficult to watch. I feel trapped in a stress dream.

    Dave Weigel:

    Dems: “Here is the constitutional basis for impeachment”

    GOP: “Everrett Dirksen could’ve been a great podcaster”

    Aaron Rupar:

    so, uh, Trump’s impeachment trial strategy appears to be to just have folks go out there and wing it like it’s an open mic night or something.

  134. blf says

    More on Mr Castor, Esq‘s, opening presentation from the Grauniad’s current impeachment ][ live blog:

    Reporters compared the former president’s lawyer to a college student who did not do the reading before class, joking that Castor would be fired by tweet if Trump still had access to his Twitter account.

    Abby D Phillip: “I have been in this government class before, where someone hasn’t done the reading, napped through the first half of class, gets called on and just riffs for 15 minutes.”

    […]

    Seung Min Kim: “If Trump still had his Twitter account, he may Tweet-fire this lawyer on the spot.”

  135. says

    The most amazing thing here is that the guy appears to have notes.”

    It’s almost like he’s making it harder for the Senators to go along with this bullshit argument.

    “The reason I’m having trouble with the argument is…” – Trump’s lawyer

    Now he said the people chose Biden because they didn’t like Trump and now Biden’s sitting in the White House, probably wondering why the Senate isn’t working on his stuff.

  136. says

    Wonkette:

    […] [Republicans have] absurdly claimed even discussing the violent insurrection “glorifies” violence.[…]

    No really, this is what the one-term loser’s clown car defense wrote: “In a brazen attempt to further glorify violence, the House Managers took several pages of their Memorandum to restate over 50 sensationalized media reports detailing the horrific incidents and shocking violence of those hours.”

    Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is like the crafty Southern defense lawyer who often foiled McCoy, except Graham seems to have hit his head recently and suffered law-specific brain trauma. He’s opposed to House Managers calling witnesses at the impeachment trial, which is reasonable because their testimony would prove damning. However, thanks to Stacey Abrams and the great state of Georgia, Republicans no longer have the majority and can’t reject witnesses, as they did during 2020’s first-annual impeachment trial.

    But Graham has an alternate strategy. He’s gonna double-dog dare Democrats to call witnesses. […]

    Last night, Sean Hannity told Graham he wanted to hear from President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris (whom he refers to by her first name because he’s racist), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Maxine Waters, Senator Cory Booker, and Eric Holder, who has no direct connection to the events on January 6 but is also Black.

    Graham laughed and “warned” Democrats that if they call one witness, he’d call everyone on Hannity’s list. It’s mutually assured boredom. The problem is that the impeachment managers would love to hear firsthand accounts of the Capitol siege from the victims. Hannity and the other racists on the Fox News prime time lineup believe the siege was no worse than last summer’s Black Lives Matter rallies, which Democrats supported. That’s neither true nor relevant to the specific charges against the one-term loser, but even if it was, an eyewitness to a crime isn’t less credible because they’re a hypocrite. Bad people’s testimony helps convict other bad people every day.

    Later, Laura Ingraham dismissed the violent insurrection that actually happened and charged Biden with fomenting a metaphorical “insurrection,” where he governs like a liberal Democrat who was legally elected.

    Biden’s open-borders zealots have what they want. Big business, they get their slave labor, and the social justice warriors, the far-left “Squad'” types, they have their new population that can be molded and formed into socialist party faithful. […]

    There is an insurrection taking place against America, all right. It’s been going on for years in the deepest depths of the DC swamp. And now its figurehead resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

    Yikes.

    Ingraham and other conservatives compare riots in Portland, Oregon, to a domestic terror attack at the nation’s Capitol. Biden wasn’t in office when “Portland burned,” and Republicans don’t want the public examining, side by side, Biden’s clear condemnation of violence and the insurrectionist in chief’s bizarre “We love you. You’re very special” kissy-face remarks to cop killers. […]

    [Marjorie Taylor] GREENE: “If the #Jan6 organizers were Trump supporters, then why did they attack us while we were objecting to electoral college votes for Joe Biden? The attack RUINED our objection that we spent weeks preparing for, which devastated our efforts on behalf of Trump and his voters.”

    […] Marjorie Taylor Greene dumped a load of crazy on Twitter today. She insists that the people dressed in MAGA wear, flying flags in support of their traitor president, weren’t MAGA supporters. This “defense” is so disconnected from reality, you’re waiting for the DA to yell, “Objection, this case is being judged on the temporal plane, your honor.”

    Greene claims that the MAGA mob wasn’t MAGA because they RUINED her jacklegged coup. […] Greene argues that the bank robbers obviously weren’t on her side because they screwed up her carefully plotted bank robbery. […]

    GREENE: “They placed pipe bombs at the RNC and the DNC the night before. They did NOT just target one party. They targeted Republicans and Democrats. They were against the government ALL together.”

    It’s obvious that MAGA’s allegiance was solely to its mad king not to the Republican Party. That’s still evident as anyone who voted to impeach the one-term loser has faced censure. His January 6 rant, which incited the mob, “targeted Republicans and Democrats.” He whipped the mob into a frenzy against “the government all together.” Seriously, it’s on video. […]

    [Trump] is probably going to skate on impeachment again, but don’t tell us he’s innocent. It insults our intelligence, but maybe that’s the point. His enablers want to stick us with one final gaslighting session.

    Link

  137. says

    One of Trump’s impeachment lawyers sued him last year — and accused him of making claims about fraud with ‘no evidence’

    Last year, Philadelphia lawyer Michael T. van der Veen filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump accusing him of making “repeated claims” that mail voting is ripe with fraud “despite having no evidence in support of these claims.”

    This week, van der Veen is adopting a different posture as part of the team of attorneys defending Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election result in his Senate impeachment trial.

    How a longtime personal-injury lawyer found himself at the center of that trial, which opened Tuesday, may say more about his client than his own legal career. Trump struggled to find lawyers to take on his case, parting ways with several who were unwilling to claim that the 2020 election was stolen, as the president is said to have wanted them to do.

    Van der Veen’s route to Trump’s legal team began when the firm he founded hired Bruce L. Castor Jr. in December. Castor, a former prosecutor from suburban Philadelphia, in turn was recommended to Trump aides and hired last month.

    Washington Post link

  138. says

    Trump’s lawyer Schoen is just ranting that it’s a partisan attack blah blah blah.

    He just quoted something allegedly from the House Managers’ trial brief, p. 65, and I can’t find it on p. 65 of the document or of the PDF. Doesn’t sound like something from the document. Could it be the same thing they did with Kalt’s work?

  139. blf says

    The Grauniad explains that bad fantasy multiple aerocraft & flying saucer midair collision “argument” by Mr Castor, Esq, in the current impeachment ][ live blog:

    Bruce Castor closed his opening comments by acknowledging that Donald Trump’s defense team was caught off guard by the strength of the House impeachment managers’ presentation.

    The former president’s [sic] lawyer said the defense team reshuffled because they thought the managers’ presentation would focus only on the question of Senate jurisdiction rather than recounting the violence and destruction of the January 6 insurrection.

    We have counter-arguments to literally everything they have raised, and you will hear them later in the case, Castor said.

    […]

    Caught off guard… focus on Senate’s jurisdiction… seemingly totally unawares most(?) Constitutional scholars don’t think there is an issue, and the impeachment managers have been signalling their basic strategy. All teh bestingerest peoples, post-Wacko House occupancy edition.

  140. blf says

    The Grauniad’s current impeachment ][ live blog points out David Schoen, Esq, is ranting:

    David Schoen criticized the House impeachment managers for playing movies to make their case for Donald Trump’s conviction.

    […]

    Shortly after Schoen issued his criticism, he played his own video, showing Democrats calling for the impeachment of Trump as early as 2017.

    Schoen’s video opened with a clip of Jamie Raskin, the lead impeachment manager, as menacing music played in the background. [Background music — very not similar to a movie (not)! –blf]

    And slightly earlier:

    […] Schoen then appeared to suggest that the impeachment trial could spark another civil war, saying, This trial will tear this country apart, perhaps like we have only seen once before in American history.

  141. snarkrates says

    I suspect that the lawyers for Darth Cheeto realize that it doesn’t matter how badly they fuck up their defense. He will not be convicted because it is impossible to find 17 Republicans who possess a spine, let alone a brain. What this shows is that it is impossible for a President to be convicted and removed from office unless a supermajority of 67 Senators are from the opposite party.

    So, kiss off the Constitution. Democracy was nice while it lasted.

  142. snarkrates says

    “We’re at pound the table stage already.”
    No, we’re at the “pound the pudendum” stage.

  143. blf says

    SC@204, I happened to catch that bit on PBS. I couldn’t quite make out the title, but suspect it was… or at least was intended to be presumed to be. It’s a bit telling the clown didn’t actually say what the book was; I suspect a competent lawyer would leave the jury in noless doubt. (Granted, this is an opening statement.)

  144. blf says

    SC@210 quotes Joy Reid, “Would I be off-base to say these are the worst lawyers since Trump’s other lawyers?”

    No, maybe not the worst: They haven’t lost yet. IF they do manage to loose, then given the current suspicion is hair furor won’t be impeached, they would manage to be even worse than Rudy Giuliani — a Star Chamber, rigged in their favour, and they still manage to loose !

  145. blf says

    The Grauniad’s current impeachment ][ live blog notes several thugs who are not impressed with the trying-to-be-worse-than-Giuliani clowns:

    ● John Cornyn: “The president’s [sic] lawyer just rambled on and on”.
    ● Ted Cruz: “I don’t think the lawyers did the most effective job”.
    ● Bill Cassidy: “They talked about many things but they didn’t talk about the issue at hand”.

    Senator Cassidy was one of the 45 thugs who voted on 27-January that the trial was unconstitutional, but today voted that it is constitutional.

  146. says

    SC @210, This is Trump’s seventh team of lawyers, and that’s only if you leave out Bill Barr and Michael Cohen.

    I don’t know. It’s hard to be worse than Sydney Powell or Rudy Giuliani. It is possible that the lawyers presenting the case today will not be sued by Dominion or Smartmatic.

    Trump’s team did remind me at times of Mike Lindell.

  147. says

    Josh Hawley was in the gallery of the Senate for part of the presentation … not paying attention.

    Other Republican senators engaged in conversation with each other while the Democrats presented the case.

  148. says

    5 people hospitalized in shooting at Minnesota clinic, explosives found and suspect in custody

    Law enforcement officials responded to a report of gunfire at the Allina Health Clinic in Buffalo, Minnesota, on Tuesday, police said.

    At least five people were hospitalized after a shooting at a medical clinic in Minnesota and explosives were found at the scene, authorities said.

    An “active shooter incident” occurred at the Allina Health Urgent Care – Buffalo Crossroads clinic in Buffalo, Minnesota, on Tuesday morning, Wright County officials said in a statement. Authorities identified the suspect as Gregory Paul Ulrich, 67, who was well known to local authorities.

    “The history that we have as a department with this individual makes it most likely that this incident was targeted with this facility or someone in that facility,” Buffalo Police Chief Pat Budke told reporters.

    Based on prior history with Ulrich, authorities believe that it was an isolated event and that the alleged gunman acted alone. The suspect had a history that “spanned several years” and included Ulrich being “unhappy” with the health care he has received, Budke said. […]

  149. says

    From Iowa Public Radio:

    Multiple Democratic lawmakers said the director of the Iowa Department of Public Health told them on Monday that Gov. Kim Reynolds did not ask for the department’s input before removing the state’s limited mask mandate. The department and the governor’s office did not deny these reports.

  150. says

    From Politico:

    The Justice Department has abandoned an arguably unprecedented lawsuit seeking to confiscate the proceeds of a book written by an aide [Stephanie Winston Wolkoff] to former First Lady Melania Trump.

  151. says

    From The Washington Post:

    A House committee investigating conservative social media site Parler on Monday demanded answers about its ownership, possible ties to Russia and whether the company offered a significant stake to former president Donald Trump to entice him to join the platform.

  152. blf says

    The Grauniad with snark, from their current impeachment ][ live blog:

    Donald Trump is reportedly unhappy with his lawyers’ performance today…

    [… various sources claiming hair furor was “angry” and “screaming”…]

    A Trump advisor told the New York Times’ Maggie Haberman that Trump attorney Bruce Castor’s confusing, meandering performance was a deliberative strategy designed to lower the emotion in the room, though, I’d counter, a master strategist wouldn’t need to put out a background statement explaining their strategy.

  153. says

    […] Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), the only Republican to change his opinion and joined a small group of GOP colleagues who voted in favor of the trial’s constitutionality, told reporters Trump’s team was “disorganized” and did “a terrible job.”

    “They did everything they could but to talk about the question at hand, and when they talked about it, they kind of glided over it, almost as if they were embarrassed of their arguments,” Cassidy said, calling the Trump team’s approach “random.” […]

    Another Republican who voted with Democrats, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), told reporters that she was “really stunned at the first attorney who presented for former President Trump,” Castor.

    “I couldn’t figure out where he was going, spent 45 minutes going somewhere,” the senator said, according to a Capitol Hill pool report. “I don’t think he helped with us better understanding where he was coming from on the constitutionality of this.”

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), who also voted that the trial was constitutional, said she was “perplexed by the first attorney, who did not seem to make any arguments at all, which was an unusual approach to take,” according to a pool report.

    Even senators who voted for the Trump lawyers’ argument thought they did poorly.

    “I don’t think the lawyers did the most effective job,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) told reporters, according to a pool report.

    House impeachment manager Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), by contrast, was “impressive,” Cruz said. “He’s a serious lawyer.”

    “The President’s lawyer, the first lawyer, just rambled on and on and on and didn’t really address the constitutional argument,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), according to a pool report.

    “Finally the second lawyer got around to it and, I thought, did an effective job. But I’ve seen a lot of lawyers and a lot of arguments and that was it was not one of the finest I’ve seen.”

    Link

  154. says

    About some of those white, middle-class or upper-middle-class white people arrested for participating in the attack on the Capitol:

    […] 64-year-old Thomas E. Caldwell of Berryville, Virginia—was arrested Jan. 19 and charged with conspiracy and multiple other counts related to the insurrection. As The Washington Post’s Katie Shepherd reports, Caldwell’s attorneys filed a rejoinder this week noting that Caldwell was a decorated Navy veteran with a top secret security clearance, and after leaving the armed forces in 2009 he had served as a section chief for the FBI.

    Caldwell is only one of a number of the insurrectionists who have military and police connections; six Seattle police officers are currently under investigation for having been present in Washington, D.C. that day, as are a number of others from jurisdictions around the nation. In the meantime, the Pentagon has ordered a military-wide pause across all services as commanding officers try to assess the levels of far-right extremism within their own ranks, spurred by the high numbers of military veterans engaged in the Capitol takeover.

    “The presence of law enforcement officers in the riot reinforces and substantiates the greatest fears many in the public had in the nature of law enforcement in the United States,” Michael German, a former FBI special agent and fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty and National Security Program, told Shepherd.

    Other participants in the Capitol siege have been in the news this week:

    Ethan Nordean, the violent bodybuilder from Auburn, Washington, who helped spearhead the coordinated effort by the Proud Boys to break down police barricades and enable the invasion of the Capitol, was ordered to be flown to Washington, D.C., this week after a judge briefly ordered Nordean’s release pending trial. U.S. Magistrate Judge Brian Tsuchida issued an order approving approving Nordean’s pretrial release after a morning hearing on Monday; by late afternoon, U.S. District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell—chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where Nordean faces charges—granted federal prosecutors’ appeal seeking to stay the order and instead transport Nordean to Washington immediately.

    Jason Riddle, a man from Keene, New Hampshire, who had boasted on social media about stealing a bottle of wine and a book from a Senate office, was charged with multiple counts related to his behavior at the insurrection. Prosecutors said that federal authorities became aware of Riddle’s involvement after Riddle gave an interview to a Boston TV station admitting to entering the Capitol because he “just had to see it” and having no regrets about having done it, leading multiple people to contact the FBI. Riddle, a former mail carrier and former corrections officer, told FBI agents that he had merely followed the crowd of rioters into the building, where he then took an open bottle of wine and drank from it as he strolled about the Capitol, along with a reddish-brown leather book from an office titled “Senate Procedure.” He also told agents he sold the book outside the building to an unknown man who purchased it for $40.

    Jenny Spencer, a woman from Pilot Mountain, North Carolina, appears to be offering a similar kind of defense for her behavior—claiming that she had just wandered inside with the crowd and then tried to leave quickly. She claims that she and her husband, Christopher, found themselves forced inside by the crowd in order to avoid being trampled—and then, once inside, realized “we gotta get outta here.” They told investigators they were only inside the Capitol for less than 15 minutes; however, the FBI noted that Christopher Spencer streamed live videos for more than 20 minutes on Facebook showing the couple, along with others, chanting and yelling at police officers, and that the couple did not “actively appear to be searching for exits during the videos.”

    Greg Rubenacker, a Long Island man who works as a DJ, filmed himself smoking marijuana from a vaporizer inside the Capitol and also posted it on Snapchat—and was arrested Tuesday by the FBI after one of his followers forwarded incriminating screen shots to them. “Holy s–t! This is history! We took the Capitol!” he said on one of the videos he posted online. Then he filmed himself smoking from a vaping device, blowing out smoke into the Rotunda, then looking into the camera and saying: “America, baby. What a time.”

    William Merry Jr. of St. Louis County, Missouri, who was photographed holding a broken piece of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s nameplate with his 21-year-old niece, was also hit with multiple charges for his role in the insurrection. His niece had been arrested in mid-January. Merry’s attorney claimed: “He believes he had a right to attend a rally and voice his political beliefs like we all do, but he does not in any way shape or form condone any type of violence or property destruction or any type of insurrection of the government.”

    Brian McCreary, 33, a Domino’s Pizza deliveryman from North Adams, Massachusetts, was arrested after returning to work and boasting to his coworkers that he had “raided” the Capitol. McCreary can be seen in photo leaning against a wall and shooting video with his phone inside the Senate chambers. He is not accused of participating in the violence, but told investigators he was present when Ashli Babbit, a rioter from Texas, was fatally shot by Capitol Police, and that he had reentered the building after being ordered by security to leave.

    Karl Dresch, a Michigan man from the Upper Peninsula who was arrested in January by the FBI, is the son of a now-deceased Republican legislator. He faces a potential 20-year sentence on a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, along with a bundle of misdemeanor charges related to his participation in the Capitol siege. Dresch is the son of former state Republican lawmaker Stephen Dresch of Hancock.

    Bruno Cua, an 18-year-old from Milton, Georgia, is one of the youngest of the arrestees. Cua made it all the way to the floor of the Senate while wielding a baton with which he had menaced Capitol police officers, allegedly getting into a physical altercation with them. Cua was a heavy user of social media including Parler, TikTok, and Instagram, where he had used the handle “PatriotBruno,” but after the insurrection he deleted most of his posts. Archived messages from Parler show that Cua had referred to Trump frequently, calling his compatriots to participate on Jan. 6.

    “President Trump is calling us to FIGHT!” one post read. “It’s time to take our freedom back the old fashioned way.”

    Link

  155. says

    Humor/satire from Andy Borowitz:

    Donald J. Trump’s defense lawyers stunned the United States Senate on Tuesday by acknowledging that their client had incited the Capitol riot, but only because his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, made him do it.

    The Senate listened in astonished silence as Trump’s lawyers coldly and methodically hurled Kushner under the bus.

    Bruce Castor, one of Trump’s lead attorneys, claimed that the ex-President had been reluctant to speak to the angry mob of supporters on January 6th, and did so only after Kushner assured him, “What could possibly go wrong?”

    “It’s gonna be awesome!” Castor quoted Kushner exclaiming.

    According to Davis Logsdon, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, the lawyers’ new argument could be persuasive “because it fits into a larger pattern of everything Jared Kushner doing or saying turning into crap.”

    “Although it remains unlikely that there are enough Republican votes to convict, this new claim gives G.O.P. senators another option: voting to remove Jared Kushner as Trump’s son-in-law,” he said.

    New Yorker link

  156. Ichthyic says

    Prosecutors said that federal authorities became aware of Riddle’s involvement after Riddle gave an interview to a Boston TV station admitting to entering the Capitol because he “just had to see it” and having no regrets about having done it, leading multiple people to contact the FBI. Riddle, a former mail carrier and former corrections officer, told FBI agents that he had merely followed the crowd of rioters into the building, where he then took an open bottle of wine and drank from it as he strolled about the Capitol, along with a reddish-brown leather book from an office titled “Senate Procedure.”

    …”Prosecutors then informed the judge they would need a temporary trial delay while they sought what they called a “Basilisk Tooth”.

  157. says

    Guardian – “Myanmar protesters return to streets in huge numbers amid police defections”:

    Protesters have turned out in huge numbers across Myanmar, a day after police instigated the most violent scenes yet in demonstrations against a military coup that removed civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

    An estimated 100,000 people gathered in the commercial capital Yangon on Wednesday, according to witnesses, with many more marching across the country.

    A day earlier, tens of thousands demonstrated in major cities and smaller towns in defiance of a ban on gatherings in some areas, with police using water cannon, rubber bullets and live rounds against them. One woman remains in a critical condition after being shot in the head in the capital Naypyidaw.

    In Loikaw, the state capital of Kayah, about 40 police joined protesters on Wednesday and held a banner saying: “Members of Myanmar police force (Kayah state) stand with civilians.”

    Other officers waved posters that read: “We do not need military dictatorship” and raised three-finger salutes, a symbol of resistance against the military.

    At a separate protest in the city of Mawlamyine, a single officer moved to join protesters. On Tuesday, about 20 police switched sides at four different sites – at Pathein, Naypyidaw, Myeik and Magway.

    Protesters in Yangon have largely adhered to a curfew imposed from 8pm to 4am under section 144 of Myanmar’s colonial-era Penal Code – turning instead to pot and pan banging from the safety of their homes – but have defied the ban on large gatherings.

    “We cannot stay quiet,” youth leader Esther Ze Naw told Reuters on Wednesday. “If there is blood shed during our peaceful protests, then there will be more if we let them take over the country.”

    In Naypyitaw, hundreds of government workers marched in support of a civil disobedience campaign that has been joined by doctors, teachers and railway workers, among others.

    Alongside the protests, a civil disobedience movement has affected hospitals, schools and government offices. Staff from the electricity and power ministry in Naypyitaw were among the latest to join the civil disobedience movement on Wednesday.

    Protesters’ demands now go beyond reversing the coup.

    They also seek the abolition of a 2008 constitution drawn up under military supervision that gave the generals a veto in parliament and control of several ministries, and for a federal system in ethnically diverse Myanmar….

  158. says

    DN! – “Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández Under U.S. Investigation for Bribery, Drug Trafficking”:

    In New York, Reuters reports a recent federal court filing has confirmed right-wing Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández is being investigated by U.S. authorities for his possible involvement in drug trafficking. Federal prosecutors accuse Hernández of using law enforcement and the military to protect drug traffickers. Hernández reportedly accepted millions of dollars in exchange, promising traffickers they wouldn’t be prosecuted or extradited to the U.S. Hernández has remained a key U.S. ally despite long-standing accusations of corruption, human rights abuses and involvement with drug cartels.

  159. says

    DN! – “ICC’s ‘Landmark Decision’ Could Open Door to Prosecuting Israel for War Crimes in Palestine”:

    In a landmark decision, judges at the International Criminal Court say the body has jurisdiction over war crimes committed in the Palestinian territories, opening the door to possible criminal charges against Israel and militant groups like Hamas. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the international tribunal’s decision “pure anti-Semitism” and rejected its claim of jurisdiction, as did the United States, while Palestinian officials and human rights groups welcome the news. Human rights lawyer Raji Sourani, director of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights in Gaza, says the decision restores “the independence and the credibility of the ICC.” We also speak with Katherine Gallagher, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights and a legal representative for Palestinian victims in front of the ICC. She says the court’s ruling is “a landmark decision” that provides “some measure of accountability” when war crimes are committed in Palestinian territories. “There are just an array of violations that have been going on for years,” Gallagher says….

    Very worthwhile interviews atl.

  160. says

    Rosa Brooks (link to her book about DC policing atl):

    In case you were wondering, the only sitting president ever arrested was Ulysses S Grant. It was nearly 150 years ago, and he was arrested by a DC Metropolitan Police officer. For speeding. With a horse and carriage.

    And unlike some presidents I could name, Grant made no objection. He was escorted to the police station by one of MPD’s first Black police officers, civil war veteran William West.

    West reportedly said, “I am very sorry, Mr. President, to have to [arrest you], for you are the chief of the nation, and I am nothing but a policeman, but duty is duty, sir, and I will have to place you under arrest.”

    Grant commended West for doing his duty, and was released upon payment of a $20 bond. (The equivalent of more than $400 in today’s $).

    Grant was philosophical about the whole thing: “Let no guilty man escape, if it can be avoided. No personal considerations should stand in the way of performing a public duty.”

    Listen up, GOP….

  161. says

    Update to #148 – great news:

    BIG: #Saudi Woman Activist [Loujain] Al Hathloul is RELEASED from jail, her sister Lina announces. She was jailed in 2018.

    [Loujain]’s Release was initially expected tom. #Saudi has announced series of reforms this week, and in a call between US Sec of State Blinken and FM Farhan the issue of human rights came up (State Dept readout).

    [Loujain]’s case became a lightning rod for activists jailed in 2018

  162. says

    Bits and pieces of news:

    * Former Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel (R) who’s already run unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate twice, announced this morning that he’s now trying for a third time. The Republican said he’s running in order to “fight for President Trump’s America First Agenda,”

    * The National Republican Congressional Committee announced this morning that it’s settled on a list of Democratic targets in the 2022 race for control of the U.S. House. The list includes 47 incumbent lawmakers, six of whom represent districts that Donald Trump carried last year.

    * After Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) voted yesterday to allow the Trump impeachment trial to proceed, the Republican Party of Louisiana issued a written statement expressing its “profound disappointment” in the GOP senator.

    * How important is it that tens of thousands of Republican voters are formally changing their party affiliations? The New York Times took a closer look at the recent trend: “Voting experts said the data indicated a stronger-than-usual flight from a political party after a presidential election, as well as the potential start of a damaging period for G.O.P. registrations as voters recoil from the Capitol violence and its fallout.”

    * Rep. Peter Meijer (R-Mich.) was very nearly censured by his local Republican Party for having voted to impeach Trump, but GOP officials deadlocked on an 11-11 vote on Monday night, so the resolution did not pass. […]

    Link

  163. says

    Weapons grade dunderheadedness: Michigan’s top GOP lawmaker: Jan. 6 Capitol attack was a ‘hoax’

    Shirkey’s “occasional lapse in restraint” matters. What matters more is that Michigan’s top GOP lawmaker believes a hopelessly bonkers conspiracy theory.

    All is not well in Michigan’s Republican Party. Three months after a disappointing election cycle in the state — Joe Biden flipped Michigan from “red” to “blue” at the presidential level, and Sen. Gary Peters (D) won re-election — GOP leaders appear eager to move in an even more radical direction.

    This past weekend, for example, the Michigan Republican Party elected its leadership team, following a process in which many contenders were evaluated based on their fealty to Trump and their opposition to 2020 election results. Soon after, the New York Times reported on the apparent “Republican alliance with paramilitary groups” in the state.

    Trumpism and Trump’s lies are still poisoning state-level Republican politics.

    […] Senate Majority leader Mike Shirkey, the highest ranking Republican elected official in Michigan, recently said he believes the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol was not carried out by supporters of former president Donald Trump, calling the idea a “hoax” and stating that the attack was “staged.” … A video of the meeting was first reported on by Detroit Metro Times.

    “That wasn’t Trump people. That’s been a hoax from day one,” Shirkey said in the video, adding, “It was all staged.”

    In the same recording, the GOP legislator also said, in reference to Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D), that he and his colleagues have “spanked her hard” on some issues. He added, “I did contemplate, once or twice, I did contemplate inviting her to a fistfight on the Capitol lawn.”

    “Spanked”!? Throw in some misogyny while you’re at it.

    By way of an explanation, Shirkey said in an emailed statement, “I said some things in a videoed conversation that are not fitting for the role I am privileged to serve. I own that…. I have many flaws. Being passionate coupled with an occasional lapse in restraint of tongue are at least two of them. I regret the words I chose, and I apologize for my insensitive comments.”

    And while an apology was warranted given the circumstances, it wasn’t entirely clear what Shirkey was apologizing for.

    We are, after all, talking about a state Senate majority leader — hardly some obscure legislative backbencher — who apparently believes that a pro-Trump riot was a “hoax” that was “staged” by unidentified forces. […]

    just this morning, the Michigan GOP leader was overheard telling Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist (D) that he regretted “some of the words” he chose, but added, “I frankly don’t take back any of the points I was trying to make.”

    Shirkey added that he expects the FBI to identify the real culprits behind the Capitol attack “within the next couple weeks.”

    […] To the extent that reality still has meaning, the deadly insurrectionist attack on the heart of our democracy was tragically real. […] many of Trump supporters have “openly bragged about their participation on social media and have explicitly told law enforcement that the former president had asked them to storm the Capitol building.”

    In terms of the broader takeaways from stories like these, it’s worth reemphasizing that as much as Republicans in D.C. talk about “moving on” from the deadly riot and the former president’s role in inciting the violence, many Republicans at the state level aren’t prepared to move on at all.

  164. says

    Excerpt from a longer article about one of the disingenuous arguments some Republican senators are using to claim that no impeachment trial should be held:

    Democrats should be “addressing real challenges,” and not just impeachment? As it turns out, that’s precisely what’s happening.

    Indeed, it’s no small detail that Democrats appear to be doing far more work on these matters than Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. As Jon Chait noted this week, 10 Senate Republicans met with the president in the hopes of negotiating a bill to speed vaccinations and restore jobs — and neither Cruz nor Rubio were part of the 10.

    What’s more, both voted with their party last week against the budget resolution that will make passing a relief package possible.

    In other words, there’s an ongoing legislative effort to do exactly what Rubio and Cruz believe should be done, and they’ve left little doubt that they plan to vote against the plan.

    The senators are arguing in effect, “Instead of impeachment, we should be focused on meaningful legislation, which we intend to oppose and play no part in shaping.”

    Link

  165. says

    GOP senator says Trump is entitled to a ‘mulligan’ for Jan. 6

    As far as Mike Lee is concerned, exactly how many “mulligans” is Trump entitled to?

    In the wake of last month’s insurrectionist attack on the U.S. Capitol, Donald Trump’s Republican allies have come up with a variety of strained defenses. Some have said his remarks were wrong, but don’t rise to the level of an impeachable offense. Others have stuck to procedural points, emphasizing the fact that the former president is no longer in office, so the underlying questions no longer matter.

    As the New York Times reported, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) offered a different approach.

    Senator Mike Lee of Utah, a conservative Republican, suggested on Tuesday that former President Donald J. Trump be given a “mulligan” for exhorting an angry gathering of supporters to march on the Capitol on Jan. 6.

    After reflecting on other elected officials who’ve made comments about political confrontations, the Utah senator said, “Look, everyone makes mistakes, everyone is entitled to a mulligan once in a while.”

    In context, Lee appeared to be referring to both Trump and others who’ve used language he considers comparable.

    […] “A mulligan, in golf, refers to the informal practice of allowing an opponent to take a second shot after an errant first swing without incurring any penalty on the official scorecard.”

    When applied to the debate over Trump’s misconduct, the Utah Republican seemed to be effectively arguing that the former president deserves a “mulligan” for having incited a deadly riot, attacking the U.S. Capitol in the hopes of overturning an election and allowing the losing candidate to remain in power.

    There are a few glaring problems with this.

    First, casually trying to dismiss Trump’s role in inciting a deadly riot is as unpersuasive as it is offensive. As DNC Chairman Jaime Harrison put it, “Mulligan?! Several died. Hundreds injured. Threats were made to murder the Vice President of the US and the Speaker of the House. Our nation’s Capitol Building was desecrated. Senator, this is not a damn golf game!” […]

    Second, comparing Trump’s Big Lie and the violence it spurred to some heated rhetoric from Democratic officials is misguided: the latter didn’t lead to violence and bloodshed.

    Finally, how many “mulligans” are Republicans prepared to give the former president? A year ago, nearly every GOP senator, including Lee, gave Trump a pass after he tried to extort a foreign ally into helping him cheat in an election. After that impeachment trial, a variety of Republicans assured the public that Trump had learned a valuable lesson and would be far more responsible going forward.

    A year later, Trump pleaded with his followers to come to D.C. on Jan. 6, whipped them into a frenzy, and then dispatched them to the Capitol. It was the culmination of four years of scandals and abuses without precedent in the American tradition. […]

  166. says

    […] we learned quite a bit on Day One of the proceedings.

    We learned that House impeachment managers brought their A game. Senators heard from Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), Joe Neguse (D-Colo.), and David Cicilline (D-R.I.), each of whom were devastating in their presentations, making a powerful, compelling, and factual case. Even many Republicans grudgingly conceded how impressive they were.

    We learned that that their Team Trump counterparts had no A game. In these divisive times, it was nice to see practically everyone — left, right, and center — marvel at Bruce Castor’s confusing and spectacularly unpersuasive presentation, which he appeared to be making up as he went along. His colleague, David Schoen, was only marginally better. The gap in quality between the Democratic attorneys and Trump’s defense team was jarring, and at one point, Castor conceded that he and his colleagues “changed” their presentation because the House impeachment managers’ presentation was so “well done.” The candor was welcome; the largely incoherent presentation was not.

    We learned that Senate Republicans remain largely indifferent to the merits of the case. To a large extent, yesterday was a test for GOP senators: would they hear both sides, recognize how awful Team Trump’s position is and how poorly it was presented, ignore precedent, and vote the way the former president wanted them to? As the dust settled, 44 out of 50 Senate Republicans — 88% of the caucus — flunked the test.

    We learned Team Trump did not impress its client. The former president, whose obsession with watching television is well documented, was reportedly “furious” with his defense team. It’ll be interesting to see whether he agrees to pay them or not.

    The proceedings’ second day will get underway this afternoon, with House impeachment managers having 16 hours to make their case. They’re expected to wrap up tomorrow, and it’s not yet clear whether the Democrats intend to take up the full 16 hours. (They did not use all of their allotted time yesterday, finding it unnecessary to respond to the presentation from Trump’s lawyers.)

    On Friday and Saturday, the former president’s defense team will also get 16 hours to present their case. [Aiyiyiyiiy, spare me]

    Link

  167. says

    From today’s impeachment trial proceedings:

    Raskin’s New Version Of ‘Fire In A Crowded Theater’

    Addressing the Trump team argument that the then-President had a right to voice his political opinions, Raskin said the old “shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater” standard of criminal speech didn’t do Trump’s incitement justice.

    It’s more like a case where the town fire chief, who’s paid to put out fires, sends a mob — not to yell “Fire” in a crowded theater, but to actually set the theater on fire. And who then, when the fire alarms go off, and the calls start flooding into the fire department asking for help, does nothing but sit back, encourage the mob to continue its rampage and watch the fire spread on TV with glee and delight.

    So then we say this fire chief should never with allowed to hold this public job again, and you’re fired and you’re permanently disqualified, and he objects. And he says we’re violating his free speech rights just because he’s pro-mob or pro-fire or whatever it might be.

  168. says

    Brilliant … not.

    David Schoen, the defense lawyer who didn’t embarrass himself quite as much as Bruce Castor did on Tuesday afternoon, seemed on track to get to his colleague’s level later that night when he mocked Democrats for supposedly not having a rapturous audience for their incendiary speeches like Trump does.

    “They’re using rhetoric that’s just as inflammatory or more so,” Schoen told Sean Hannity. “The problem is, they don’t really have followers, dedicated followers, when they give their speeches.”

    While Trump probably appreciated hearing someone on national TV talk about how much his fans love his speeches, the impeachment managers tasked with proving that those speeches spurred on a violent insurrection probably appreciated it even more.

    Link

  169. says

    Raskin Dissects Trump’s Half-Hearted Attempt At Quelling Mob That Trump Incited

    Raskin analyzed Trump’s pre-recorded video posted hours after the Capitol insurrection, which the House impeachment manager argued failed to offer a stern condemnation of the mob of Trump supporters who breached the Capitol.

    After taking aim at Trump for watching the insurrection on TV “like a reality show,” Raskin said that the then-POTUS “did nothing to help us as commander in chief” but instead “served as the inciter in chief” with statements “sympathizing with the insurrectionists.”

    […] criticizing the then-President for beginning his remarks in the video saying “I know your pain, I know your hurt” only to go on and boost his false claims of election fraud.

    “We’d just been under attack for three hours, but here’s what he actually goes on to say: ‘I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election. And everyone knows it, especially the other side,’” Raskin said, quoting Trump.

    “So you think he’s about to decry the mayhem and violence, the unprecedented spectacle of this mob attack on the U.S. Capitol, but he’s still promoting the big lie that was responsible for inflaming and inciting the mob in the first place,” Raskin said. “If anyone ever had a doubt as to his focus that day, it was not, to defend us, it was not to console us. It was to praise and sympathize and commiserate with the rampaging mob.”

  170. says

    Kaitlan Collins:

    Multiple people tell me Trump was basically screaming as Castor made a meandering opening argument that struggled to get at the heart of the defense team’s argument.

  171. says

    Politico – “Proud Boy charged in insurrection blasts Trump’s ‘deception’ in new court filing”:

    One of the Proud Boys arrested for participating in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol told a court Wednesday that he was duped by President Donald Trump’s “deception” and “acted out of the delusional belief” that he was responding patriotically to the commander in chief.

    Dominic Pezzola, who was indicted last month and charged with conspiracy, urged a federal court to grant his release pending trial, emphasizing that his involvement in the Proud Boys was recent and minimal and that he has no other criminal history. But the most notable part of Pezzola’s 15-page motion for leniency was his thorough repudiation of Trump.

    “[D]efendant acted out of the delusional belief that he was a ‘patriot’ protecting his country … He was responding to the entreaties of the-then commander in chief, President Trump,” Pezzola’s lawyer argued in the filing. “The President maintained that the election had been stolen and it was the duty of loyal citizens to ‘stop the steal.’ Admittedly there was no rational basis for the claim, but it is apparent defendant was one of millions of Americans who were misled by the President’s deception.”

    Pezzola is not the first charged in the Capitol insurrection to cite Trump’s calls as the motivation for marching on and breaching the Capitol. But he’s among those facing the most serious charges, along with several other members of the Proud Boys, in connection with Jan. 6.

    His filing also takes sharper aim at Trump than many of the other rioters who mentioned Trump.

    “Many of those who heeded his call will be spending substantial portions if not the remainder of their lives in prison as a consequence,” Pezzola’s attorney wrote. “Meanwhile Donald Trump resumes his life of luxury and privilege.”

    Pezzola’s criticism of Trump dovetails with the case House impeachment managers plan to make Wednesday during opening arguments at his Senate trial on a charge of inciting the insurrection. The managers contend that Trump was the “singular” cause of the riots and that his supporters were responding to his calls when they stormed the Capitol.

  172. says

    Two of the biggest QAnon channels on Telegram, with 180,000 and 56,000 subscribers respectively, have endorsed the baseless conspiracy theory that vaccinating children increases the probablity of them identifying as homosexual or transgender at a later stage.

    This comes after Abbas Tabrizian, an Iranian cleric who proclaims to be an “expert on Islamic medicine” and is well-known for promoting health misinformation, false medical advice and cures, claimed a few days ago vaccines turn people into “cotrolled robots” and homosexuals.”

  173. says

    Bits and pieces from Wonkette’s coverage of the second day of the impeachment trial:

    2:25: Raskin closes by telling story of Capitol police officer who defended them from the terrorist attack, then broke down afterward saying he had gotten called the “N-word” 15 times that day, by Trump’s terrorists.

    […]

    12:34: Neguse importantly notes that Trump very consistently used three phrases to incite people: the Big Lie that the “election was stolen,” and that he couldn’t lose unless there was fraud; “stop the steal”; and finally “fight like hell.” Neguse is showing tweets and clips going all the way back to April.

    12:39: Neguse noting that Trump’s actions and words were inciting violence long before January 6. Elections officials got death threats all over the country. And that on January 6, Trump’s speech was timed to happen just before Congress was getting about its business. It was planned.

    […] Neguse plays tape of insurrectionists saying these things out loud: “We were invited by the president of the United States!” “President Trump requested that we be in DC on the 6th.”

    And when it was ongoing, people were “begging him to stop the attack,” but he didn’t. Because he was enjoying it. Even the part about how they were targeting Mike Pence, his own vice president.

    12:52: Neguse showing affidavits regarding arrested insurrectionists. One says they would’ve killed Mike Pence if they found him. Another said, “We were looking for Nancy to shoot her in the friggin’ brain but we didn’t find her.”

    And then there were these quotes from insurrectionists, all saying they were just doing what Dear Leader told them to do. [Image at the link]

    […] July 19: Trump refuses to commit to a peaceful transfer of power.

    September 23: Trump says if you “get rid of the ballots” we won’t have to worry about it, because there’ll just be a “continuation” of power. His power.

    […] Many more tweets about RIGGED and FRAUD and INACCURATE. And many clips, which Castro is playing.

    […] Castro shows clip of a dumbfuck Trump supporter September 15 in Cumming, Georgia, saying the only way Trump could lose would be if RIGGED, and more dumbfuck Trump supporters September 24 in Jacksonville, Florida, also saying Trump could lose is RIGGED. They had been brainwashed into the Big Lie.

    1:05: Castro now moving to how Trump tried to stop the counting once more votes were counted and it became clear he was a loserfuckingloser. Notes that there are probably senators in that room right now who started becoming more clear winners of their races as more votes were counted.

    Trump tweet on election night, a little after midnight: “They are trying to STEAL the election.” Trump dumbfuckingmouth at 2:30 a.m. election night, calls it a fraud, says “frankly we DID win this election.”

    Tweets the next day: “STOP THE COUNT!” “STOP THE FRAUD!”

    Castro makes good point that when Trump wants somebody to stop doing something, HE SAYS IT IN ALL CAPS. But he didn’t SAY IT IN ALL CAPS when terrorists were in the middle of attacking the Capitol.

    1:11: Democrats now showing a montage going back and forth between Trump’s lies and his violent supporters screaming “STOP THE STEAL” and “STOP THE FRAUD” and “STOP THE COUNT” just after the election. “They had bought into his Big Lie,” says Castro.

    […] Swalwell will present the evidence of everything Trump did after the election was called, advancing his Big Lie and “dous[ing] the flames with kerosene.”

    1:17: Trump tweet November 15: “I CONCEDE NOTHING.” “RIGGED ELECTION.”

    Trump tweet November 17: “Dead people voted.”

    Trump tweet November 26: “We have found many illegal votes.”

    […] Trump tweet December 5: Trump attacks GOP governors of AZ and GA, saying if they were with him, he would have “already won” those states.

    1:21: Swalwell showing clips of insurrectionists surrounding the Michigan secretary of state’s house, even after Michigan’s results were certified, as Trump continued to lie through his teeth about what happened in Michigan, inciting his sleeper cells to threaten Michigan elected officials.

    1:23: The night before the Electoral College voted, December 13, Trump issued 13 tweet incitements full of his Big Lie about fraud and stolen elections. Joe Biden still won in a fucking landslide the next day.

    1:29: Swalwell […] notes that all Trump’s ads he ran about stopping the steal or whatever mysteriously stopped on January 5. It was like he was preparing them for something. Attacking Republican electeds for not fighting enough. Saying “history will remember.” […]

    1:33: Swalwell also has Trump retweeting random Twitter followers about bringing in the “cavalry,” and retweeting Kylie Kremer, the organizer of the January 6 rally, pushing people to show up.

    “Deliberate, planned, and premeditated” is what this attack was, says Swalwell. […]

    Link

    Swalwell also pointed out that Trump spent $50 million of his legal defense fund to run advertisements like “Stop the Steal” ads, etc.

  174. says

    Garrett Haake:

    Just left the chamber, where most members were at least partially engaged with @RepJoeNeguse presentation. The biggest exception: @HawleyMO – sitting up in the gallery with his feet up on the seat in front of him, reviewing paperwork, throughout.

    Maybe Hawley is afraid to hear the truth.

  175. says

    Bits and pieces from Washington Post coverage of the second day of the impeachment trial:

    Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.), one of the impeachment managers, detailed Trump’s efforts to dismiss a Biden win as “rigged” — even before the November 2020 election took place.

    The former president’s goal, Castro said, was to incite his base, “to make sure that his supporters were angry, like the election was being ripped away from them.”

    “This is clearly a man who refuses to accept the possibility or the reality in our democracy of losing an election,” Castro said of Trump, after pointing to remarks Trump made in the spring, summer and fall of 2020 in which he announced the election would be “rigged” if Biden won.

    Castro noted that once Election Day rolled around, Trump repeatedly claimed that he had won — and that the vote count should have been halted while he was ahead on election night.

    “Here, every vote counts,” Castro said. “You don’t just stop counting when one person is ahead. We count every vote.”

    In addition to footage of Trump, Castro also played footage of CNN interviews with Trump supporters who said they believed a Biden win would not be legitimate.

    “Now, all of us in this room have run for election — and it’s no fun to lose,” Castro said. “I’m a Texas Democrat. We’ve lost a few elections over the years. But can you imagine telling your supporters that the only way you could possibly lose is if an American election was rigged and stolen from you? … But that’s exactly what President Trump did.”

    “His words,” Castro added, “became their actions.”

    Washington Post link

  176. says

    I like this segment by Dean. She’s recounting the history of Trump’s ignoring courts, pressuring and attacking state and local officials, pressuring the Justice Department, and bullying Pence. (There are five separate categories, but the slide isn’t up anymore.)

  177. says

    Ted Lieu is continuing the discussion started by Dean, talking about how Trump attacked and threatened legislators who didn’t go along with him.

    “I’ll tell you how we got here. President Donald John Trump ran out of nonviolent options to retain power.”

  178. says

    SC @265.

    Even if he is still seated in the gallery, I wonder if Josh Hawley could ignore the audio of Capitol police officers desperately calling for help.

  179. says

    From Wonkette:

    […] Reuters tweet from Tuesday.

    A divided Senate voted largely along party lines to move ahead with Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial on a charge of inciting the deadly assault on the Capitol

    The tweet downplays, by which we mean does not acknowledge at all, that six Republicans out of 50 voted to move ahead with [Trump’s] second annual impeachment trial. That’s not really “largely along party lines,” when it’s the most bipartisan an impeachment vote has ever been. Those voting to proceed included Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, a significant defection. However, even if the Senate is “divided” on impeachment, Americans aren’t.

    Early this week, ABC News claimed that only a “narrow majority” supported the Senate convicting the insurrectionist in chief and barring him from holding future office. Let’s look at what ABC News considers a “narrow majority.”

    But in this latest poll, 56% of Americans say Trump should be convicted and barred from holding office again, and 43% say he should not be. The new poll was conducted by Ipsos in partnership with ABC News using Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel.

    Yeah, a 13-point spread isn’t a “narrow” majority. This is only slightly better than the fantasy, make-believe math the one-term loser used to declare that he won the last election “in a landslide.”

    Norm Eisen was counsel to the Democrats during the one-term loser’s first impeachment […] Eisen told Politico that he’s encouraged by how many Americans, regardless of ideology, support holding the previous White House occupant accountable for inciting a deadly insurrection against the US government.

    “We just had 47 percent of Americans who agreed with us that Trump should be convicted at the beginning of the prior impeachment trial. This one, you start with 56-57 percent of Americans — 20 percent of Republicans.”

    The counter argument is that House and Senate Republicans would like to win their next primary so aren’t going to alienate the 80 percent of coup-curious Republicans who oppose impeachment and conviction. Republicans govern according to their next primary, which isn’t how Democrats operate. Democrats realize that American voters include people who disagree with them and try to seek consensus. Republicans just try to keep everyone else from voting. Democrats lose elections and reconsider their platform. Republicans lose elections and reconsider if Black neighborhoods really need polling places.

    The one-term loser was never popular, because more than white people exist in America […] They should stand up to the crazy Marjorie Taylor Greenes in their attics.

    If Senate Republicans fail to convict Donald Trump, it won’t be because the facts were with him or his lawyers mounted a competent defense. It will be because the jury includes his co-conspirators. [tweeted by Hillary Clinton]

    Elected Republicans ignore all but their most deranged voters, while Democrats promote policies that a majority of Americans actually like. The media covers President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 relief package as if he’s “going it alone,” and while Republicans might snub their nose at the final bill, they represent a vocal minority. According to a CBS News poll, eight out of 10 Americans want Congress to pass an economic relief package, and only one out of 10 believe the amount currently discussed is too generous. Four times as many Americans are concerned it’s too small.

    During the dark couple years when Republicans controlled the White House and both chambers of Congress, they tried (and fortunately failed) to repeal the Affordable Care Act and passed a $1.9 trillion economic relief package for billionaires. The only thing bipartisan about their agenda was American voters’ opposition to it.

    Democrats are behind the wheel for at least the next two years. They should go big without seeking approval from a political party that willingly includes Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley among its ranks. The media will just have to adjust to the new bipartisanship.

    Link

  180. says

    If you watch this closely you can see that if these guys had a clearer understanding of the layout of the Capitol building they could have cut off these escapes and either captured much of the national leadership or forced security to shoot their way through the insurgent mob.”

    Yes! And even given their relatively limited knowledge it’s amazing it wasn’t far, far worse.

  181. says

    HuffPo – “At Least 9 Far-Right Insurrectionists Have A History Of Violence Against Women”:

    …Larry’s history of abusive behavior is part of an alarmingly common trend among the rioters who have been arrested so far for their roles in the insurrection. After reviewing police reports and court filings, a HuffPost investigation found that at least nine insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol have a history of violence against women ― ranging from domestic abuse accusations to prison time for sexual battery and criminal confinement.

    Experts have linked extremism to violent misogyny in recent years, especially in the wake of mass shootings in which the perpetrators had a history of violence against women. These violent behaviors exist on a spectrum ― and, of course, not all abusive men turn into killers ― but violence against women often begets more violence, sometimes deadly. Three people died as a direct result of the violence at the Capitol, and more than 140 law enforcement officers were injured during the riot. Two U.S. Capitol Police officers have died by suicide in the aftermath.

    “We still, in this day and age, treat violence against women as a personal or family issue, as opposed to a troubling indicator of someone who could become more violent,” said Bridget Todd, communications director at feminist organization UltraViolet.

    The details in many of the cases are shocking and disturbing….

    Much more atl.

  182. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    MSNBC will be televising the impeachment prosecutions case starting at midnight. I’ve seen some snippets. Very powerful.

  183. blf says

    Utah rejects bill that aimed to teach consent in sex education classes (Grauniad edits in {curly braces}):

    […]
    Despite chronic struggles with sexual violence in Utah, lawmakers in the state have rejected legislation that would have changed the state’s health education curriculum to teach consent and prevent unwanted sexual behavior.

    The legislation, called HB177, was defeated by Utah’s house education committee by a vote of 7-4.

    The bill’s defeat was part of a larger conservative pushback across America. Some politicians argue, wrongly, that consent instruction teaches students it is OK to have sex, said Jennifer Driver, senior director of reproductive rights at the State Innovation Exchange.

    […]

    In Utah, where rape is the lone violent crime perpetrated at a higher rate than the national average, teens and young adults suffer a scourge of unwanted physical contact and the lasting trauma that comes with it.

    Around one in seven of the state’s high-schoolers reports experiencing sexual violence in a year, while 7.6% say they have endured forced sexual intercourse, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2019 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

    [… I]n the state’s schools, current sex education standards focus on “refusal skills” to prevent sexual misconduct, a reactive tactic that puts the onus on victims instead of perpetrators.

    […]

    {Refusal skills} lets us teach children the necessary skills the good representative wants. I’m uncomfortable adding consent into our curriculum when our current curriculum already teaches these safety skills, said Deanna Holland, vice president of the anti-abortion group Pro-Life Utah.

    Currently, Utah law mandates that abstinence-based sexual education be promoted as the most effective way to avoid pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases in health classes across the state. Critics have long argued that focusing on refusal places an unnecessary burden on the victim.

    “We know that it’s perpetrators who need the education because people who say no still get assaulted,” said Alan Buys, a victim advocate. He urged the committee to adopt the bill noting some of his students had “done sexual things without getting consent” because they “didn’t have a clue” that they should.

    […]

  184. blf says

    Counterfeit N95 masks sold to US healthcare, government workers:

    […]
    Federal authorities in the United States are investigating a massive counterfeit N95 mask operation in which fake 3M masks were sold in at least five states to hospitals, medical facilities and government agencies. The foreign-made knockoffs are becoming increasingly difficult to spot and could put healthcare workers at grave risk for the coronavirus.

    [… F]raud remains a major problem as scammers seek to exploit hospitals and desperate and weary Americans. Federal investigators say they have seen an increase in phoney websites purporting to sell vaccines as well as fake medicine produced overseas and scams involving personal protective equipment. The schemes deliver phoney products, unlike fraud earlier in the pandemic that focused more on fleecing customers.

    […]

    “They’re not coming from authorised distributors,” said Kevin Rhodes, 3M’s vice president and deputy general counsel. “They’re coming from companies really just coming into existence.”

    Rhodes encouraged medical facilities and even workers to look on the company’s website for tips on how to spot fakes, namely through packaging or faulty trademarks.

    […]

    Officials in Washington state examined their mask supply […] and discovered that 300,000 masks they had purchased for about $1.4m were counterfeit. […]

  185. blf says

    Prophetess Amanda Grace Says Trump’s Impeachment Trial Is Proof He’s Still President [sic] (RWW edits in {curly braces}):

    […] Grace declared that the impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump is evidence that Trump is still the president. […] Grace claimed that it is all part of God’s plan to make it appear as if Joe Biden is president so that everyone will know it was a miracle of God when Trump is put back into office.

    There has been a delay for a reason, Grace said. It’s not over, and it’s far from over with what the Lord is going to do with President Trump, what the Lord is going to do to the wicked of this nation, including the media. You know, I prophesied from the Lord in October about the media suffering the biggest crisis they ever had in 2021 for their crimes, so I’m watching for that to unfold.

    There’s been a delay because I believe God is trying to get people’s eyes on him, she continued. He wants all eyes on him right now for the demonstration he’s going to put on. Just like when the Jews were at the Red Sea, and they’re there, and Egypt’s at their back, and it’s all eyes on God because either the Lord is going to do this, or it’s not going to happen. And when they thought there was a dead end, God saw a path through that water. So, God’s ways are much higher when he sees how to make a path when people don’t think there is a way.

    The Lord has never said to me {Trump is} not going to serve a second term,” Grace added. Sometimes what the Lord doesn’t say is as important as what he says. And he never said to me, ‘President Trump is not going to serve a second term.’

    We interrupt this lunatic’s deranged rant to point out, with absolute certainty, teh magic sky faeries also never said — as just a few examples — hair furor still occupies Wacko House, you are my official spokesloon and prophetess, the mildly deranged penguin does not like cheese, and spiders are cute. She may have imagined some of that, and some of it might even not be completely false nor contrary to evidence / fact, but by her “reasoning”, it’s all just as “true”, for the same-ish value of “true” she is (ab)using.

    We now return to her ranting…

    However, I do believe, because I prophesied this last night from the Lord, a surprise is coming with this impeachment because you can’t impeach a citizen. So something is very interesting here going on, because they’re trying to impeach a citizen right now, if he really is a citizen. You can only impeach a sitting president, so this is like we have dueling presidents right now. This is what it is: dueling presidents.

    [… and on and on. and on…]

    At least as quoted, she didn’t mention the also-lunatic hypothesis hair furor magically re-occupies Wacko House on 4th March, Hold the Line’: QAnon Adherents Claim Trump Will Become President Again on March 4. This astonishingly nutty claim apparently originated with teh sovereign crazies, that a law back in 1871 somehow changed the States into a corporation (controlled by <insert racist stereotypes here>). A snippet:

    As March 4 approaches, the Trump International Hotel in DC hiked its prices for suite bookings close to that date. Some rooms are selling for $1,331 per night, up 180 percent from the standard rate in March, according to Forbes. This form of opportunistic marketing is another example of how Trump and his affiliates have leveraged QAnon.

  186. says

    Guardian – “‘We all know what we’re facing’: divided Myanmar unites against coup”:

    The Myanmar military took power last week on the promise of “restoring eternal peace” to a country riven by seven decades of ethnic conflict. Since the takeover it has made remarkable progress in uniting the deeply divided country against a common enemy: itself.

    In Myanmar’s biggest city, Yangon, strangers greet each other with the three-finger salute – a symbol of resistance against the regime – and trucks offer free rides for demonstrators. Neighbours cook chickpea curry in big vats on the streets to dish out to passersby, and volunteers distribute refreshments to keep people hydrated under the hot sun.

    Protesters of all ages and backgrounds have taken to the streets, including beauty queens, shirtless musclemen, cosplayers and snake owners along with their scaly pets. Marginalised groups have also joined rallies, among them LGBT members who say the mass gatherings present a path for their future acceptance.

    “People on the marches tell us we should have our rights,” said Min Khant, 21, a Yangon drag queen whose stage name is Walkie Talkie. “They are proud of us. LGBT are protesting in their heels and waving rainbow flags across Myanmar.”

    Myanmar still has a colonial-era anti-sodomy law and, although more publicly gay figures and Pride events have pushed progress, discrimination remains common.

    Min Khant, who applied his skills as a makeup artist to prepare his friends for the demonstrations, said the mass struggle against military dictatorship “will make us more accepted”.

    “We all know what we are facing,” he said. “We ask that the world helps us.”

    During the marches on Wednesday, the drag queens were met with applause.

    Meanwhile, in the south-east coastal city of Mawlamyine, Kyaw Minn Htike, 25, broke one of Myanmar’s biggest taboos by protesting openly as a Rohingya – the predominantly Muslim minority from Rakhine state subjected to a brutal 2017 crackdown by the Myanmar military that human rights lawyers have described as genocide.

    Rohingya are widely seen in Myanmar as interlopers from Bangladesh, and labelled “Bengalis”. However, Kyaw Minn Htike said his group had received “no bad reactions” when they waved signs reading “We (Rohingya) Stand for Democracy”.

    “The majority of people realise that in a national crisis these marginalised communities came out to the frontline,” he said. “That’s the citizen spirit. After the protests I believe there will be better unity between the majority and the minorities.”

    When Aung San Suu Kyi personally defended the military against accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice in The Hague in December 2019, crowds gathered in Myanmar’s cities to support her. But many Rohingya, rather than hold this against her, have called for her immediate release from military detention, as well as the release of other National League for Democracy (NLD) leaders.

    “Defending or blaming the Tatmadaw [military] and accepting the Rohingya community are two different issues,” said Kyaw Minn Htike. “Although Rohingya youth activists have been well accepted during this crisis, there is still a big chunk of the population that have negative views on the Rohingya, especially when it comes to citizenship or being accepted as a national ethnic group.”

    Another ethnicity that has suffered greatly because of military campaigns, the Kachin of northern Myanmar, have demonstrated against the coup in cities throughout the country.

    A 32-year-old Kachin education researcher based in Yangon, who asked for anonymity, said minority ethnic groups were initially reluctant to join protests because of the abundance of NLD flags and chants. People in some borderland areas are suspicious of the party due to criticism that it has failed to deliver ethnic rights and federalism reforms.

    “Most ethnic armed organisations think they will never be acknowledged, either under NLD or military leadership,” she said. “But the majority of ethnic people, including me, accept that the country will be worse under military rule.”

    If the NLD does return to power, she added, it would give more opportunities to minority ethnic people in future.

  187. says

    Here’s a link to the February 11 Guardian coronavirus world liveblog.

    From there:

    No need to quarantine after Covid contact if fully vaccinated, says CDC

    People in the US who have received the full course of Covid vaccines can skip the standard 14-day quarantine after exposure to someone with the infection as long as they remain asymptomatic, public health officials have advised.

    The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has said the vaccines have been shown to prevent symptomatic Covid-19, thought to play a greater role in the transmission of the virus than asymptomatic disease, Reuters reports.

    Individual and societal benefits of avoiding unnecessary quarantine may outweigh the potential but unknown risk of transmission (among vaccinated individuals).

    The agency has laid down strict criteria for people who would no longer have to quarantine after the vaccinations, including having received both doses of a two-dose vaccine.

    People who choose not to quarantine should do so only if they received their last dose within three months, and should only avoid 14 days quarantine after their last shot, the time it takes to develop immunity, CDC said. Fully vaccinated persons who do not quarantine should still watch for symptoms for 14 days following an exposure, it added.

  188. blf says

    SC@281, I was under the impression one still needs to wait a few days (a week or so, cannot recall) after the second jab before there was “full” protection. If that recollection is correct, I’d be inclined to still isolate / quarantine for a week (at least), mostly on the off-change of becoming infected during that window.

    More importantly, being fully vaccinated does not remove the need to use a mask ! As I understand it (and again, I could be mistaken), whilst one probably won’t be ill, one may still be or become a carrier, potentially infecting others. This need to continue wearing masks will persist (again, usual caveat about me possibly being mistaken) until there is true herd immunity — which in practical terms, presumably means most or all of this year (2021), and possibly longer, depending on region.

  189. says

    HuffPo – “Trump’s Tweet Attacking Pence Came Right After Learning His VP’s Life Was In Danger”:

    Donald Trump posted a tweet attacking his own vice president for lacking “the courage” to overturn the election for him ― enraging his Jan. 6 mob even further ― just minutes after learning that Mike Pence had been removed from the Senate chamber for his own safety.

    Newly elected Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told reporters Wednesday night, following the second day of the former president’s impeachment trial, that Trump had called for his help in delaying election certification the afternoon of the U.S. Capitol attack but he had told Trump that Pence had just been taken from the Senate and he couldn’t talk just then.

    “He didn’t get a chance to say a whole lot because I said, ‘Mr. President, they just took the vice president out. I’ve got to go,’” Tuberville said.

    According to video footage from that day, Pence was removed from the Senate at 2:14 p.m. after rioters had broken into the Capitol, meaning that when Trump lashed out at Pence at 2:24 p.m., he already knew Pence’s life was in danger.

    “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution,” Trump wrote in his tweet.

    Videos shown by Democratic House members presenting their impeachment case document that rioters were aware of Trump’s tweet. Some had erected a gallows outside the Capitol. Others roamed the halls, chanting, “Hang Mike Pence.”

    The exact time Pence was taken from the Senate following the breach of the Capitol by the mob Trump had incited to try to overturn the presidential election was known the day of the attack, as was the time of Trump’s tweet. What was not known until Tuberville’s statement was whether Trump was aware of the danger Pence was in at the time he posted his tweet….

  190. blf says

    The impeachment managers reflect a diverse US — unlike the senators they seek to persuade:

    […]
    One side holds up a mirror to America in 2021. The other, not so much.

    The nine Democratic prosecutors at Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial are made up of men and women young and old with multiple racial and religious identities.

    But each day in the Senate chamber they are trying to persuade a caucus of 50 Republicans still dominated by ageing white men.

    The contrast is not obvious on television but striking to reporters in the press gallery who gaze down at the sea of faces — clad in masks because of the coronavirus pandemic — visible above wooden desks on a tiered semicircular platform.

    [… short summaries of several of the managers…]

    The multiracial lineup of prosecutors is all the more resonant because they are detailing the actions of a mob that included white nationalist groups and flaunted regalia such as the flag of the Confederacy, which fought a civil war to preserve slavery.

    And the rioters’ objective was to overturn an election that Trump lost specifically by nullifying votes cast by people of colour, most of which went to his opponent, Joe Biden.

    […]

  191. blf says

    A snippet from ‘If you switch off, people think you’re lazy’: demands grow for a right to disconnect from work (my added emboldening):

    [Natalia] Zurowska moved from Poland to France in July to start a job in the sales department of a paint company in Marseille and with work split between home and the office, has fewer complaints now. “I find that France is very good for work-life balance,” she says. “Here, the lunch break is sacred. There would have to be a war or earthquake to stop it. […]”

    I’m not at all certain a war, earthquake, volcano, the mildly deranged penguin, or any combination of thereof would stop the all-important French lunch hour — Just one hour?!!!1! Sacrilege! Heresy!! Pre-pandemic, whilst the “traditional” two-ish hour lunch is now perhaps a bit rare, hour-plus lunches are, in my own experience, still rather common. Whilst there is vin — this is France, after all — in my experience, French lunches aren’t normally “boozy” (yet again in my experience, British — or at least English — lunches seem to be that; as one example I recall rather well, I once watched two lawyers down two full bottles of claret over lunch).

  192. says

    CNN – “Justice Department says an Oath Keepers leader waited for Trump’s direction before Capitol attack”:

    The Justice Department is now making clear that a leader among the Oath Keepers paramilitary group — who planned and led others in the US Capitol siege to attempt to stop the Biden presidency — believed she was responding to the call from then-President Donald Trump himself.

    “As the inauguration grew nearer, [Jessica] Watkins indicated that she was awaiting direction from President Trump,” prosecutors wrote in a filing Thursday morning.

    This is the most direct language yet from federal prosecutors linking Trump’s requests for support in Washington, DC, to the most militant aspects of the insurrection.

    Previously, the Justice Department has somewhat held back on linking Trump’s words so closely to the extremist group’s actions during the riot. At least four defendants this week have argued in court they followed Trump’s direction to go to the Capitol building on January 6.

    The Justice Department filing continued: “Her concern about taking action without his backing was evident in a November 9, 2020, text in which she stated, ‘I am concerned this is an elaborate trap. Unless the POTUS himself activates us, it’s not legit. The POTUS has the right to activate units too. If Trump asks me to come, I will. Otherwise, I can’t trust it.’ Watkins had perceived her desired signal by the end of December.”

    Prosecutors in the filing argue to keep Watkins in jail pending trial. She was arrested several weeks ago and has been indicted for conspiracy and other charges related to the Capitol riots.

    Prosecutors describe Watkins as a military veteran who’s now a leader in the broader right-wing militia movement, instrumental in a group called the Ohio State Regular Militia and a key player taking action and communicating with others once she was inside the Capitol on January 6.

    Watkins allegedly had a “single-minded devotion to obstruct through violence” the certification of Joe Biden’s presidency, prosecutors said in the filing….

    “Unlike the vast majority, Watkins had trained and plotted for a moment like this,” prosecutors wrote.

  193. blf says

    SC@287, According to the Grauniad, Instagram removes anti-vaxxer Robert F Kennedy Jr for false Covid-19 claims, that genocidal mass-murdering manic (and I’m being polite, poopyhead’s filter would have a meltdown if I fully described that shitestain on honesty and humanity), “Kennedy’s Facebook account, however, remains active, despite promoting false, dangerous claims about the safety of vaccines and Covid-19 treatments. A company spokesperson said that Facebook does not automatically disable users across various platforms.”

  194. says

    “…The FBI arrests three Kansas City-area Proud Boys and two associates

    U.S. prosecutors alleged that 5 people worked with Proud Boys from Kansas City & other unnamed individuals to breach the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Charges for the KC group were unsealed after all 5 were taken into custody: William Chrestman, Christopher Kuehne, Louis Enrique Colon

    all of Kansas City, and siblings Felicia and Cory Konold. …
    The Kansas City group arrested Thursday interacted with the Nordean-Biggs group, appearing to move together and communicate during the riot, the FBI alleged….”

    WaPo link atl.

  195. blf says

    Not at all political, but interesting nonetheless, Conch shell in French museum found to be 17,000-year-old wind instrument:

    […]
    A 17,000-year-old conch shell that lay forgotten for more than 80 years in a museum collection has been discovered to be the oldest known wind instrument of its type, after researchers found it had been modified by its prehistoric owners to be played like a horn.

    First unearthed in a richly decorated cave in the Pyrenees in 1931, the large shell was initially overlooked by archaeologists, who assumed it was a communal “loving cup” used by the Palaeolithic people whose wall art adorns the space.

    But a re-examination of the conch, carried out during a recent inventory of items held at the Muséum de Toulouse in southern France, has revealed that it had in fact been carefully drilled and shaped to hold what experts now believe was a mouthpiece.

    Other articles I’ve read don’t mention / imply a separate mouthpiece, rather that the carefully removed end of the shell was the mouthpiece. For example, from France24, Forgotten conch shell in French museum now thought to be world’s oldest seashell instrument:

    […] The researchers noticed some unusual holes in the shell. Crucially, the tip of the shell was broken off, creating a hole large enough to blow through. Microscopic inspection revealed the opening was the result of deliberate craftsmanship, not accidental wear, according to Tosello.

    By inserting a tiny medical camera, they found that another hole had been carefully drilled in the shell’s inner chamber. They also detected traces of red pigment on the mouth of the conch, matching a decorative pattern found on the wall of Marsoulas cave.

    Back to the Grauniad’s article (Grauniad edits in {curly braces}):

    Remarkably, a skilled horn player enlisted by the multi-disciplinary team of French scientists was able to produce three clear notes of C, D and C sharp from the artefact, offering a tantalising hint of how it sounded to its original owners.

    There is a video at the Grauniad.

    The conch, the team discovered, had also been decorated in its inner whorls with red pigment marks strikingly similar to fingerprint artworks on the walls of the cave. “We are supposing that the shell was decorated with the same pattern as was used in the cave art of Marsoulas, which establishes a strong link between the music played {by} the conch and the images on the walls,” said Gilles Tosello, an archaeologist and cave art specialist who was part of the investigating team.

    “That, to our knowledge, is the first time that we can see [evidence of] such a relationship between music and cave art in European prehistory.”

    […]

    The apex of the shell has been purposely removed, creating a round aperture through which a narrow stick was inserted to drill a hole, described by the scientists as “a really complex technical operation”. The outermost lip of the shell had also been trimmed, potentially to allow a player to insert his or her hand to modulate the sound.

    […]

    The team hope to experiment playing the conch in the cave where it would first have been sounded, which Tosello said he expected would be “a moment of great emotion”.

    […]

  196. blf says

    From the Grauniad’s current moar hair furor insurrection live blog:

    The killer of George Floyd, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was reportedly ready to plead guilty to murder — until Donald Trump’s attorney general weighed in.

    The Associated Press reports today that:

    Chauvin was prepared to plead guilty to third-degree murder in George Floyd’s death before then-Attorney General William Barr personally blocked the plea deal last year, officials said.

    The deal would have averted any potential federal charges, including a civil rights offense, as part of an effort to quickly resolve the case to avoid more protest […]

    Barr rejected the deal in part because he felt it was too soon, as the investigation into Floyd’s death was still in its relative infancy, the officials said.

    That Chauvin had been in plea talks has been previously reported […]

  197. blf says

    This is the sort of bureacratic nonsense I’d expect here in France — my own experiences with the NHS in teh “U”K, admittedly from last millennia, were that they were much more result-orientated / pragmatic, rather than blindly following somewhat-“arbitrary” rules — London doctors say they are running out of priority patients to vaccinate:

    […]
    Frustrated medics say they are beginning to run out of patients in the government’s top four priority cohorts to vaccinate and fear that lives will be lost unless they are allowed to immunise more people immediately.

    Doctors at the Francis Crick Institute in London say they are providing first doses at a rate of 100 a day when they have capacity for 1,000.

    […]

    A growing number of vaccination centres have given a first-dose jab to virtually all local people in the first four priority groups that want one, but they are not expected to be allowed to move on to groups five and six until next week.

    The latest figures show 450,000 people received an initial vaccination on Wednesday, taking the UK total to 13.5 million, compared with a population of 15 million in the top four immunisation cohorts.

    Priority groups one to four include anyone over the age of 70, people who are clinically extremely vulnerable, plus NHS and care workers. Figures show that 91.2% of the over-80s and 95.6% of those aged 75 to 79 had received a jab in England as of Sunday.

    Take-up is lower among the 70–74 group, at 74%, but many of those will have been targeted only this week, prompting calls to move on group five, 65- to 69-year-olds, and group six, people with underlying health conditions.

    […]

    The article does note “some GPs around the country have already quietly been given the green light by NHS officials to offer inoculations to younger patients.” That sounds closer to the NHS I know.

    Here in France, in contrast, the total people(? jabs?) is now just over 2 million. It took around six-ish weeks to reach that pathetically low total, which is only slightly more than the average current daily total in the States. According to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations, the States is currently vaccinating at a rate of slightly over 12 per 100 people, whilst France is about 3 per 100. Arrggghhhh!!!1!

  198. says

    Republican Party struggles on multiple fronts

    Unpopular, losing members, out of power, and lacking an agenda. All things considered, this is not a great position for a national party to be in.

    […] First up is this polling report from Gallup.

    Americans’ opinions of the Republican Party have worsened in recent months, with 37% now saying they have a favorable view of the party, down from 43% in November. This decline, along with a slight increase in the Democratic Party’s positive ratings, to 48%, gives the Democrats a rare double-digit advantage in favorability.

    Opinions change so slowly, so incrementally. Nevertheless, I still think this is important … and the trend continues.

    As recently as October, ahead of Election Day 2020, Democrats and Republicans enjoyed roughly identical favorability ratings. Now, Democrats have seen their support inch higher, from 45% to 48%, while the GOP has seen its support shrink from 44% to 37%.

    Meanwhile, the New York Times took a closer look this week at the number of voters who’ve changed their party registrations of late.

    An analysis of January voting records by The New York Times found that nearly 140,000 Republicans had quit the party in 25 states that had readily available data (19 states do not have registration by party). Voting experts said the data indicated a stronger-than-usual flight from a political party after a presidential election, as well as the potential start of a damaging period for G.O.P. registrations as voters recoil from the Capitol violence and its fallout.

    […] dozens of former Republican officials, “who view the party as unwilling to stand up to former President Donald Trump and his attempts to undermine U.S. democracy,” have held preliminary discussions about creating a new center-right party. […] The Republican Party has lost control of the White House. It’s also lost control of Congress. The GOP’s public standing is faltering as some of its members decide to give up on the party altogether.

    […] the party has neither a platform nor a governing agenda. […]

    Some of this may be the result of rank-and-file GOP voters tiring of Republicans becoming a conspiratorial, anti-democracy, pro-Trump party, but some of it may also be the result of some rank-and-file GOP voters concluding that Republicans aren’t being enough of a conspiratorial, anti-democracy, pro-Trump party.

    […] What does the party intend to do about it? For now, the answer appears to be, “Nothing.” Republicans generally appear comfortable to follow Trump, wait for time to elapse, and count on gerrymandering and voter-suppression tactics to help return them to power.

    […] if President Joe Biden remains popular, and he oversees an effective economic recovery and pandemic response, Republicans may discover “nothing” wasn’t quite enough.

  199. blf says

    Lynna@296 quotes an article which suggest the thugs are doing “nothing” in response to incremental popularity, membership (funding), and demographic changes. Eh? Trying for even more voter / vote suppression seems to be an antic teh thugs are up to, which could be considered a response, in part because, they are currently “Unpopular, losing members, out of power, and lacking an agenda.”

  200. says

    Still clueless:

    As part of his launch of a new U.S. Senate campaign, former Ohio state Treasurer Josh Mandel (R) boasted yesterday that he would’ve joined far-right Republicans in objecting to President Joe Biden’s electoral college votes. “If I was a United States senator, I would have been standing with Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Rick Scott in holding up the certification of the election,” Mandel said.

    Link

  201. says

    blf @297, True. Voter suppression is an agenda of sorts.

    Follow-up to comment 296.

    Richard Haass, the longtime president of the Council on Foreign Relations and a former official in the Reagan and Bush administrations, announced this week that’s he’s giving up on the Republican Party. Paraphrasing his old boss, Haass said, “I didn’t leave the Republican Party; the Party left me.”

  202. blf says

    Oh for feck’s sake, more genocidal manics running rampant, Brazil: missionaries ‘turning tribes against coronavirus vaccine’:

    […]
    Medical teams working to immunize Brazil’s remote indigenous villages against the coronavirus have encountered fierce resistance in some communities where evangelical missionaries are stoking fears of the vaccine, say tribal leaders and advocates.

    […]

    “It’s not happening in all villages, just in those that have missionaries or evangelical chapels where pastors are convincing the people not to receive the vaccine, that they will turn into an alligator and other crazy ideas,” [Claudemir da Silva, an Apurinã leader representing indigenous communities on the Purus river,] said by phone.

    […]

    “Religious fundamentalists and evangelical missionaries are preaching against the vaccine,” said Dinamam Tuxá, a leader of APIB, Brazil’s largest indigenous organization.

    The Association of Brazilian Anthropologists denounced unspecified religious groups in a statement on Tuesday for spreading false conspiracy theories to “sabotage” the vaccination of indigenous people.

    […]

    Covid-19 has killed at least 957 indigenous people, according to APIB, out of some 48,071 confirmed infections among half of Brazil’s 300 native ethnic groups. The numbers could be much higher, because Sesai only monitors indigenous people living on reservations.

  203. says

    Justice Dept switches sides, urges Supreme Court to uphold ACA

    In the Trump era, the Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to destroy the Affordable Care Act. Yesterday, that position changed dramatically.

    Throughout the Trump era, the Justice Department became a fierce opponent of the Affordable Care Act, urging multiple federal courts to destroy the health care reform law in its entirety. This remained true as a pending case reached the U.S. Supreme Court: it fell to several states to do what then-Attorney General Bill Barr’s DOJ would not do: defend “Obamacare” on the merits.

    […] as the Biden era gets underway in earnest, the Justice Department is now free to defend, not attack, existing federal law.

    The Justice Department notified the Supreme Court on Wednesday that it no longer supports the effort by Texas and other red states to declare the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional. […] That puts the government on the same side as California and several blue states that are defending the law.

    […] this does not end the pending litigation. […] when Republicans approved massive tax breaks for the wealthy in 2017, they threw in an unrelated provision: the ACA’s individual mandate, which the Supreme Court had already endorsed as part of Congress’ taxing power, would now be lowered to zero.

    That, in turn, gave some GOP lawyers an idea. If the Supreme Court had ruled that the ACA is permissible because of this tax, and the tax has effectively been eliminated, then “Obamacare” is no longer permissible. In effect, the provision of the reform law can’t be a tax if it’s zero, and if it’s not a tax, it’s an impermissible directive being imposed on Americans (even if the command has no teeth, because there are no adverse consequences for ignoring it). Ergo, the argument goes, the mandate is unconstitutional.

    And, Republicans went on to argue, if the mandate is unconstitutional, and the policy is intertwined with the rest of the Affordable Care Act, then the only sensible thing to do would be to bring down the entire existing health care system and strip tens of millions of American families of their benefits and protections.

    A group of 18 “red” states, led by Texas, filed the case, pressing the judiciary to do what Donald Trump and GOP lawmakers could not: repeal “Obamacare.”

    The week before Christmas in 2018, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor — a Bush-appointed jurist in Texas — found all of this persuasive, and agreed to strike down the entirety of the ACA, root and branch. Even many conservatives and ACA critics agreed that the ruling was indefensible, with reactions that included words and phrases such as “pretty bananas,” “embarrassingly bad,” and “absurd.”

    […] A final ruling is expected sometime between now and June. It’ll be the third time the high court has ruled on the ACA’s constitutionality.

  204. says

    Senator Romney thanked Officer Goodman:

    Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) said on Wednesday that he had briefly stepped away during Trump’s impeachment trial to express his appreciation to Officer Eugene Goodman for directing him to safety after learning through new video evidence shown during the trial’s second day, that it was Goodman who had come to his rescue as he headed south from the Senate Chamber on Jan. 6.

    “I expressed my appreciation to him for coming to my aid and getting me back into the path of safety and expressed my appreciation for all that he did that day,” Romney told reporters.

    […] “I was very fortunate indeed that Officer Goodman was there to get me in the right direction,” Romney said. […]

    Link

  205. says

    More details concerning the way(s) in which Trump aimed that mob, like a gun, at Mike Pence:

    […] As part of the presentation on Wednesday, impeachment manager Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) laid out the chronology related to a tweet Trump sent during the riot. Throughout the day, Trump had pressured Vice President Pence to block the electoral vote count that was to take place in Congress—a move that would be unconstitutional and that Pence had no authority to take. At the pre-attack rally near the White House, Trump declared before the riled-up crowd, “Mike Pence, I hope you’re gonna stand up for the good of our Constitution and for the good of our country. And if you’re not, I’m going to be very disappointed in you.” He added, “I’m not hearing good stories.” He was setting Pence up to be a fall guy—and a target.

    As Trump was speaking, Pence released a statement saying he did not possess the power to block the congressional certification of the vote. “Four years ago, surrounded by my family, I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, which ended with the words, ‘So help me God.’ Today I want to assure the American people that I will keep the oath I made to them and I will keep the oath I made to Almighty God.” Pence, in this instance, would not serve Trump over God. With these words, Pence became an enemy of Trump’s mob, many of whom were at this time heading to the Capitol, where Pence was presiding over the certification ceremony.

    As Trump’s terrorists assaulted police officers and ran amok through the halls of Congress, some directed their rage at Pence and were searching for him. Some chanted, “Hang Pence!” On the grounds of the Capitol, others built a gallows. As Castro noted, at 2:24 p.m. ET, about 30 minutes into the mayhem, Trump zapped out a tweet. It did not condemn the rioters. (Trump would not do so at any time on January 6.) The tweet did not ask his followers to end the violence and withdraw. Instead, Trump blasted his own vice president: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and out Constitution…USA demands the truth!”

    […]. Minutes earlier, Pence and his family had been evacuated from the House floor for their safety. And there is good indication that Trump had been informed of this prior to his tweet. Yet with violent extremists roaming the Capitol and on the hunt for Pence (and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi), Trump further fueled their rage and placed Pence in even greater danger. Castro played video showing a Trump rioter using a bullhorn to read Trump’s tweet condemning Pence to the crowd on Capitol Hill. The message was clear: Pence was a traitor. As the riot was intensifying, Trump had explicitly directed its wrath against Pence. This is incitement.

    During her presentation, impeachment manager Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands) noted another way in which Trump encouraged the violence that happened at the Capitol. […] Plaskett also pointed out that Trump’s political operation routinely monitored the activity of Trump supporters—including extremists—on social media and chat sites, and it would have been aware of the references to possible violent action on January 6 that had appeared in these quarters. Consequently, Trump and his team knew that he would be playing with fire when he called on the assembled to march on Congress and fight for him.

    […] the impeachment managers have demonstrated that Trump’s culpability for the brutal and bloody domestic terrorism committed by his loyalists in his name is immense and beyond question.

    Link

  206. blf says

    The Onion, Senators Overjoyed By Chihuahua Jumping Through Hoops During Impeachment Intermission:

    Cheering as the small, brown chihuahua triumphantly jumped through hoops placed throughout the Capitol chamber, senators were reportedly overjoyed Thursday when traveling act “The Amazing Nacho & Friends” performed acrobatics stunts during the impeachment intermission. […] Nacho then performed a series of tricks where he balanced on balls, caught high-flying Frisbees, and even jumped on top of Senator Chuck Schumer’s head to retrieve a treat. At press time, the pro tempore could be heard banging his gavel to restart the impeachment proceedings after Nacho became distracted, lunged from his owner, and started biting and humping the legs of several lawmakers.

    Also, Trump Attorneys Argue He Spoke Metaphorically Of Ripping Chamber Doors Off Hinges, Crushing Pelosi’s Skull:

    […] “While addressing the crowd on the National Mall, Donald Trump was only speaking figuratively when he mentioned tearing down the Capitol gates, dragging legislators by their hair, and ripping members of our government limb from limb,” said impeachment lawyer David Schoen, adding that Democrats had since twisted Trump’s clearly ironic words demanding his followers to “let fresh, hot blood flow through the halls of government.” […] At press time, Schoen added that Trump’s repeated claims of election fraud were actually just his unique way of advocating for a peaceful transition of power.

  207. johnson catman says

    re Lynna @304:

    the impeachment managers have demonstrated that Trump’s culpability for the brutal and bloody domestic terrorism committed by his loyalists in his name is immense and beyond question.

    And yet, the republicans will not vote to convict him. I would wager that every one of them that will vote to acquit spoke out negatively about the outcome of the OJ Simpson trial.

  208. says

    Humor/satire from Andy Borowitz:

    Senator Marco Rubio revealed on Thursday that he got his highest score ever on Candy Crush Saga during the second impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump.

    The Florida lawmaker said that he has been playing the video game for years but had never been able to focus on it the way he has during the first two days of the trial.

    “Ever since the impeachment trial started, I’ve really been in the zone,” Rubio said. “Just totally locked into Candy Crush.”

    The Republican said that he hopes to surpass his best Candy Crush score when Trump’s defense attorneys start presenting their case, on Friday.

    “I’ll be able to concentrate on my game even better once the House managers stop playing those noisy videos,” Rubio said. “Bruce Castor is super easy to tune out.”

    New Yorker link

  209. says

    From the Associated Press:

    President Joe Biden has officially ended the ‘national emergency’ that President Donald Trump declared in order to take money from the Pentagon to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. The White House released a letter Thursday from Biden to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi notifying Congress that he had rescinded his predecessor’s February 2019 proclamation.

    In other news, Pompeo shows up again as a narcissistic, irresponsible asshole who wasted taxpayer’s money:

    The U.S. State Department spent more than $10,000 on customized pens ordered from China to dole out as gifts for guests for then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s dinner guests, new documents show, while Pompeo was publicly pushing an aggressive stance toward Beijing.

    (Text above is from NBC News.)

  210. says

    Republicans warned about Trump and violence … five years ago

    Donald Trump “has a consistent pattern of inciting violence,” Ted Cruz said — in 2016.

    As a Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump went to unusual lengths to express his comfort with violence. Indeed, as House impeachment managers were eager to remind senators today, [Trump] at times seemed to encourage violence toward protesters before he became president, and echoed the rhetoric while in office.

    But what’s easy to forget is that Trump’s GOP rivals in the 2016 race recognized the dangers posed by his style of politics. The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel flagged an amazing clip from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) — one of the future president’s leading rivals — who was visibly gobsmacked after an incident in which there was violence at a Trump rally, which the future president made no effort to denounce.

    “The great thing about our republic is that we settle our difference in this country at the ballot box, not with guns or bayonets or violence. And you wonder whether we’re headed in a different direction today…. Forget about the election for a moment; there’s a broader issue in our political culture in this country. This is what happens when a leading presidential candidate goes around feeding into a narrative of anger and bitterness and frustration…. I think the question is what this means for the future of America, not just the Republican Party.”

    Rubio added at the time that Trump was pushing the political system toward a “boiling point” and ripping the country “apart at the seams.”

    The comments came the same week that Trump warned of “riots” if he were denied the Republican presidential nomination.

    Exactly one month later, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another top contender for the GOP nomination in 2016, raised the same concern about the ease with which Trump embraced violent tactics.

    “Donald needs to stop threatening the voters. He needs to stop threatening the delegates. He is not a mobster,” Cruz told Glenn Beck during a radio interview…. “Donald Trump now has a consistent pattern of inciting violence,” Cruz said.

    […] NBC News’ Benjy Sarlin added this morning, “Cruz was clear-eyed in 2016 that Trump could use the threat of violence by supporters to try and overturn an election, in this case a party one. He also criticized him for inciting rally violence earlier.”

    Five years ago, prominent Republican leaders knew. They saw Trump’s willingness to embrace violence; they called out his tactics; and they recognized the ease with which he connected violence and his desire for political power. These Republicans even warned the public, urging voters to understand the consequences of rewarding such a political approach. At times, they practically seemed to be predicting developments like those the world saw on Jan. 6.

    Five years later, Trump dispatched an insurrectionist mob to launch a deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol. Rubio and Cruz, both of whom voted with Trump about 90% of the time during his failed presidency, are now hearing evidence documenting the former president’s role in inciting the violence.

    They’re expected to vote to acquit anyway.

  211. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    Rachel Maddow has the Fulton Coumty, GA DA on her show about the inquiry into the Hair Furor’s attempts to extort GA officials to rig the election fo him. Links in morning if available.

  212. says

    Guardian:

    “Election officials detained in Myanmar ‘in bid to prove fraud'”:

    Myanmar’s military government is detaining election commission officials in night-time raids and asking them to provide evidence that November’s election was rigged, according to a senior member of the organisation and a human rights watchdog.

    The Tatmadaw justified its 1 February coup by alleging widespread irregularities in the vote, won decisively by Aung San Suu Kyi’s party, but their claims have been rejected by the Union Election Commission (UEC), the organisation responsible for administering elections in Myanmar.

    The campaign of arrests and intimidation of UEC officials has raised concerns the military is seeking to pressure the commission to give their backing to its election fraud claims.

    Videos have appeared on social media appearing to show some of the late-night detentions of UEC officials, including one from the central Myanmar city of Meiktila….

    “Facebook curbs Myanmar military over ‘misinformation’ as protests swell”:

    Facebook has imposed widespread restrictions on Myanmar’s military rulers to prevent them spreading “misinformation”, as tens of thousands again took to the streets in what was set to be the biggest day of protests against the coup so far.

    The social network site said on Friday that it would reduce the distribution of all content and profiles run by Myanmar’s military, saying the generals have “continued to spread misinformation” after they seized power and detained civilian leaders in a coup.

    The measures were not a ban, Facebook said in a statement, “but are aimed at reducing the number of people who see the content” and will apply to an official page run by the army and one by a military spokesperson. They would also cover “any additional pages that the military controls that repeatedly violate our misinformation policies”. The pages would no longer appear on news feeds as “recommended”.

    The social media giant said it had also suspended the ability of Myanmar government agencies to send content-removal requests to Facebook through the normal channels used by authorities across the world.

    “Simultaneously, we are protecting content, including political speech, that allows the people of Myanmar to express themselves and to show the world what is transpiring inside their country,” said Rafael Frankel, Facebook’s director of public policy.

    Hundreds of thousands of people have been protesting across Myanmar since the army overthrew the civilian government led by Aung San Suu Kyi and detained most top leaders on 1 February.

    Friday saw hundreds of separate marches in Yangon alone as people marked the Union day public holiday with what appeared to be the biggest show of defiance since the military takeover.

    The large crowds were expected to swell even more on Saturday because it is the birthday of Aung San, the country’s independence hero and father of detained leader Aung San Suu Kyi….

  213. says

    Guardian – “China bans BBC World News in retaliation for UK licence blow”:

    BBC World News has been banned from airing in China, a week after Beijing threatened to retaliate for the recent revocation of the British broadcasting licence for China’s state-owned CGTN.

    In a statement published at midnight Beijing time on Friday, China’s National Radio and Television Administration said BBC World News’s coverage of China had violated requirements that news reporting be true and impartial and undermined China’s national interests and ethnic solidarity.

    On Friday morning Hong Kong’s public broadcaster, RTHK, followed suit, announcing that from 11pm it would stop relaying BBC World news, which used to run nightly from 11pm until 7am the following day.

    In recent weeks the Chinese government has criticised BBC reports on the the Covid-19 pandemic in China and allegations of systematic rape, sexual abuse and forced labor in the Xinjiang region, home to Uighurs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic groups.

    “As the channel fails to meet the requirements to broadcast in China as an overseas channel, BBC World News is not allowed to continue its service within Chinese territory,” the Radio and Television Administration said, adding that it would not accept the BBC’s broadcast application for the next year.

    After a recent report that featured horrific allegations of sexual assault and torture in Xinjiang, Chinese officials said the claims were “wholly without factual basis” and accused the BBC of using actors to spread “false information”.

    The foreign correspondents club of China said in a statement it was concerned that the language in the Chinese authorities’ statement was intended as a warning to other foreign media “that they may face sanctions if their reporting does not follow the Chinese party line about Xinjiang and other ethnic minority regions”.

    The BBC is already generally not viewable in China outside of some hotels, businesses and residential compounds for foreigners. It was not immediately clear if the ban would affect reception in those facilities.

    The Chinese action is also a response to the decision this month by Britain’s communications watchdog, Ofcom, to revoke the broadcast licence for CGTN, China’s English-language satellite news channel.

    Ofcom cited the links between the channel and China’s ruling Communist party. The channel had previously been rebuked by Ofcom for broadcasting the alleged forced confession of a British prisoner in China, and for biased coverage of Hong Kong’s democracy movement.

    On the day of the Ofcom ruling, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson accused the watchdog of acting on “political grounds based on ideological bias” and warned that China reserved the right to respond to protect the rights and interests of Chinese media.

    CGTN said Ofcom had been “manipulated by extreme rightwing organisations and anti-China forces”.

    Losing its British broadcasting licence was a blow for CGTN since the channel acted as its European operations hub in west London, and some kind of reprisal against the BBC was seen as inevitable.

    Nevertheless, the swift Chinese response was condemned across the political spectrum in the UK…

  214. says

    Quite an oped by Irish president Michael D. Higgins in the Guardian – “Empire shaped Ireland’s past. A century after partition, it still shapes our present”:

    …At its core, imperialism involves the making of a number of claims that are invoked to justify its assumptions and practices – including its inherent violence. One of those claims is the assumption of superiority of culture and it is always present in the imperialising project. Forcing an acceptance on those subjugated of the inferiority of their culture as a dominated Other is the reverse side of the coin….

    Much more atl. Here’s some context from elsewhere in the Guardian: “Irish president attacks ‘feigned amnesia’ over British imperialism.” (“Attacks” seems an unduly strong word for Higgins or the oped. …Hm – I just noticed the link says “critiques.”)

  215. says

    Here’s a link to the February 12 Guardian coronavirus world liveblog.

    From there:

    KPMG’s UK chairman, Bill Michael, has resigned after telling staff to “stop moaning” during a virtual meeting about the coronavirus pandemic and the impact of lockdown on people’s lives.

    Michael, who has headed the company since 2017, was speaking at a virtual town hall meeting on Monday with members of the firm’s financial services consulting team when he made the comments.

    The 52-year old Australian, who also said that staff should stop “playing the victim card” and described the concept of unconscious bias as being “complete and utter crap for years”, apologised and said on Friday the scandal over his comments had made his position at the accounting giant “untenable”.

    Trump much more ill with Covid-19 than reported

    Maanvi Singh

    Donald Trump was reportedly much more ill with Covid-19 in October than the White House publicly admitted at the time, with some officials concerned that he would need to be put on a ventilator.

    Trump experienced “extremely depressed blood oxygen levels” and a lung problem commonly associated with pneumonia caused by Covid-19, according to a report in the New York Times citing four people familiar with the former president’s condition.

    Trump was admitted to Walter Reed national military medical centre for several days in early October after he tested positive for the virus, less than a month before the presidential election. At the time, a White House memo described the 74-year-old as “fatigued but in good spirits”.

  216. says

    CNN – “Military officials were unaware of potential danger to Pence’s ‘nuclear football’ during Capitol riot”:

    Military officials overseeing the authorization process to launch nuclear weapons were unaware on January 6 that then-Vice President Mike Pence’s military aide carrying the “nuclear football” was potentially in danger as rioters got close during the violent Capitol insurrection, according to a defense official.

    The vice president is always accompanied by a backup of the “football,” which contains the equipment to carry out orders to launch a nuclear strike. It must be ready at all times and is identical to what the president carries, in case he becomes incapacitated.

    US Strategic Command became aware of the gravity of the incident after seeing a video played at the Senate impeachment trial Wednesday showing Pence, his Secret Service agents and a military officer carrying the briefcase with classified nuclear launch information running down a flight of stairs inside the Capitol to get to safety, the official said.

    “As the rioters reached the top of the stairs, they were within 100 feet of where the vice president was sheltering with his family, and they were just feet away from one of the doors to this chamber,” Del. Stacey Plaskett, one of the impeachment managers, explained in the senate trial on Wednesday. In one video, the crowd can be heard chanting “Hang Mike Pence” as they stand in an open doorway of the Capitol.

    It is not clear if other national security elements of the government such as the National Security Council or top officials at the Pentagon were aware of the gravity of Pence’s position and those of his team.

    On January 6 the military officer was able to maintain control of the backup “football” at all times and the President was inside the White House, the official said. Even if the rioters had gotten hold of it, they could not have used any of the information because of the security controls on the system, the official said.

    Since they never lost control of the “football” and then-President Donald Trump was safe, they didn’t have to deactivate Pence’s system. But the incident raises the question of whether the “football’s” status was sufficiently accounted for at all times.

    “The risk associated with the insurrectionists getting their hands on Pence’s football wasn’t that they could have initiated an unauthorized launch. But had they stolen the football and acquired its contents, which include pre-planned nuclear strike options, they could have shared the contents with the world,” Kingston Reif, an expert on nuclear weapons policy at the nonpartisan Arms Control Association, told CNN.

    “Such an outcome would have been a security breach of almost incomprehensible proportions,” Reif added. “And it ought to raise further questions about the rationale for the anachronism that is the football.”…

  217. KG says

    blf@295,

    A friend who lives in London, and who, AFAIK, is not in the “top four groups”, has already been given the first dose. They do have an “underlying condition”, but unless there’s something about it I don’t know (which is possible) would be in group 6 (those between 16 and 64 with an underlying condition making them more vulnerable), not the higher-priority “clinically extremely vulnerable” group. I’m in group 5 (65-69 years old), and have been given an appointment for 21st Feb – although the Scottish government has just announced they are having to slow down because of limited supplies, so it’s possible it will be delayed. Could it possibly be that London is getting better supplies than Scotland? Under the glorious leadership of Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, self-appointed “Minister for the Union”?? Surely not!

  218. says

    NBC – “Biden administration finalizes deal for 200 million vaccine doses from Pfizer, Moderna”:

    The U.S. has finalized a previously announced deal with Pfizer and Moderna for 200 million more coronavirus vaccine doses, which should provide enough to vaccinate nearly every American, President Joe Biden said Thursday.

    During a visit to the National Institutes of Health, Biden said the federal government signed the final contracts Thursday afternoon for 100 million more doses of the Moderna vaccine and 100 million more from Pfizer and BioNTech.

    Biden said last month that he was directing the federal government to secure the additional doses on top of the 400 million ordered during the Trump administration. With the new order in place, the U.S. will have enough supply to fully vaccinate 300 million people with the two-dose vaccines, Biden said.

    It remains unclear when everyone who wants vaccinations will be able to get them given the logistical challenges of administering the shots. Biden said Pfizer and Moderna were speeding production to deliver 100 million doses each by the end of May — a month sooner than initially planned. But the additional 200 million doses finalized Thursday won’t be available until the end of July.

    “We’re going to be in a position where it’s not going to be by the end of the summer,” Biden told reporters during a tour of the NIH labs, adding that it’s important that people take steps to slow the spread in the interim.

    The Biden administration has been working to ramp up the supply of the vaccines and has increased distribution to the states by 28 percent since Inauguration Day. Biden said his transition team was led to believe that the slow rollout during the Trump administration was a distribution problem, not an issue with the amount of vaccines, saying, “We were under the impression that there was significantly more vaccine.”

    “When I became president three weeks ago, America had no plan to vaccinate most of the country,” Biden said. “It was a big mess. It is going to take time to fix, to be blunt with you.”…

    (These numbers don’t include the J&J one-dose vaccine, which should get EUA approval fairly soon, but might take time to produce in large numbers.)

  219. says

    CNN – “House committee advances key portion of Covid-19 relief bill hours after Democrats finish arguments in impeachment trial”:

    The House Ways and Means Committee advanced its portion of the coronavirus relief bill Thursday just hours after the House impeachment managers finished arguing their case in the Senate trial, a sign Democrats are trying not to let impeachment completely sideline their work on President Joe Biden’s agenda.

    The committee’s portion of the bill, which totals $940 billion, makes up a hefty piece of the coronavirus relief package Democrats are working on and includes two key provisions: $1,400 stimulus checks and an expansion of the child tax credit.

    The checks became a focal point for Democrats in recent days, with some moderates and Republicans arguing they should be more targeted. Ultimately, House Democrats settled on a formula that phases out the checks at the same income thresholds as previous legislation — $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples — but phases the checks out faster at upper income levels.

    The expanded child tax credit, which was included in Biden’s proposals, would provide $3,600 per child under the age of 6 and $3,000 per child ages 6 through 17 for a single year, although Democrats have aimed to make the proposal permanent in the future. The provision would provide families with monthly payments as soon as July, although some have voiced concerns that it could take time for the IRS to get the payments up and running.

    The House Ways and Means Committee is just one of 12 House committees writing pieces of the Democrats’ Covid-19 relief bill. The House Education and Labor Committee passed its portion of the bill, which included raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025, early Wednesday morning. Other committees are also expected to move their provisions this week.

    Next week, the House Budget Committee will put the pieces together, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said during her news conference Thursday morning that she wants the package passed by the House by the end of February and on the President’s desk before March 14, when some unemployment benefits are set to expire….

  220. says

    Guardian world liveblog:

    R-value below 1 in the UK for first time since July

    The Covid-19 reproduction number, or R value, has fallen below 1 for the first time since July and is now estimated to be between 0.7 and 0.9 across the UK, according to the latest Government figures.

    R represents the average number of people each Covid positive person goes on to infect.

    When the figure is above 1, an outbreak can grow exponentially, but when it is below 1 it means the epidemic is shrinking.

  221. says

    DN! – “‘You Guys Are Not Immune’: Modi Government Cracks Down on Independent Media Amid Farmer Protests”:

    Indian farmworkers are continuing to take to the streets to demand Prime Minister Narendra Modi repeal three highly contested agricultural laws. Farmworkers say the laws, which seek to deregulate markets and allow large corporations to set prices, threaten their livelihoods. Dozens have died since the start of the protests, with many deaths caused by the harsh winter as tens of thousands of farmers have camped out in the cold on the outskirts of New Delhi and other parts of the country. The Modi government has come under harsh criticism for its response to the uprising as it raided the offices of the progressive news site NewsClick and demanded that Twitter remove hundreds of accounts as part of a crackdown on information about the protests….

    For more, we go to Mumbai, India, where we welcome back P. Sainath, award-winning Indian journalist, founder of People’s Archive of Rural India, or PARI. His latest, published in The Wire, is “Rich farmers, global plots, local stupidity.”

    P. Sainath, thanks so much for joining us. If you can talk about the crackdown on the very media that’s giving voice to the mass, epic protests around India right now?

    P. SAINATH: Well, it’s been on, interrogations, detaining people — I think it’s been on for more than 50 hours. The raids conducted on NewsClick, which, as you described, is a progressive media organization, an independent media organization, noncorporate, they — I mean, this is now being done by the Enforcement Directorate, which is not police, strictly, but bringing in economic offenses, charges which they haven’t made public but plant in the journals of the ruling fraternity, and no one has explicitly said what the charge is. But laptops, servers — I mean, laptops, hard disks, phones have been confiscated. And at least five people are without their phones or their laptops, which have been taken over.

    But the main idea of doing this is to send a warning and a message to the rest of us, the independent media, and to say that “You guys are not immune, and that we are going to crack in this way, because, yeah, it might amount to nothing in the courts, it may be thrown out, but it’s going to malign your reputation in public.” So, I call you a money launderer or something like that; none of that is going to stand up in court, but remember that they are backed the greatest proll army in the world — payroll trolls — of the ruling government. So, like, last night, there was a video, which, after a great delay, YouTube and Twitter took down, which named 10 independent media groups, including the People’s Archive, as having been extremely dangerous people who should be jailed immediately, failing which the maker of the video feared for his life. OK? So you’ve got the pressure from the government, and you’ve got the silence and connivance of the corporate media. Independent media is having it as hard as it gets just now.

    NERMEEN SHAIKH: So, Sainath, could you talk about the mainstream media? You’ve pointed out the mainstream media’s coverage, which you’ve been critical of, and you’ve also said “the mainstream media” is a strange term for news outlets that systematically exclude 70% of the population as it does in India. Talk about how the mainstream media has been covering these historic protests.

    P. SAINATH: Well, the newspapers are slightly more sophisticated than the channels. The channels are screamers, and they do pretty much what — I mean, some of them can make Fox News look, you know, moderate. But this is a completely hostile corporate media, completely with the government. You can look at the editorials on the latest budget of the government. One of the more liberal, supposedly pro-underdog newspapers says this is the most historic budget in decades. It’s a terrible budget.

    But even at the best of times, coverage of rural India and farmers is — about rural India as a whole, let alone farmers, is 0.67% of the front page in an average — in any Indian national daily. Now, these newspapers, their inside pages, I mean, crime and entertainment get more space than all — than all the social-sector beats, from environment, housing, poverty, development, farming, agriculture, climate change — put together, don’t make the kind of space that crime and entertainment make.

    The same media has shed more than 1,500 journalists, using the pandemic as an excuse. And you can guess which types of journalists get shafted. Since April last year, using the pandemic as an excuse, some of the, you know, most cash-rich media companies in Asia, or perhaps the world, have thrown out more than 1,500 journalists and thousands of nonjournalist media workers, who I think are extremely important in the entire process of information generation. So, you’ve got that on the one hand.

    Since April last year, the government and the police have arrested journalists under extraordinary provisions. You’re all familiar with arrests of Indian journalists on charges of sedition. They’ve arrested them, filed FIRs, or first information reports, on charges under the Epidemics Act — OK? — under the Disasters Act, spreading demoralization, blah, blah, blah, blah. So, anyone — I mean, those who dissent — I mean, the message is clear: Dissent, and you’re doomed. There’s between 70 and 80 first information reports filed against journalists. Journalists have spent one month in jail without being able to meet their lawyers, because they’re being arrested under extraordinary laws, like the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, and you name it. I mean, this government has just completely gone berserk in its treatment of media. So, those elements in the corporate media, the good journalists, are themselves intimidated and facing action.

    But now they’ve decided NewsClick, in particular, gained incredible traction in readership and viewership because of its coverage of the farm protests. Now, I know from our own experience of the People’s Archive of Rural India, our numbers have doubled and trebled because we cover farmers. We have published more than 50 stories on just the protests at Delhi and surrounding areas since November. Now, NewsClick, which is based in Delhi, has had something like 40 million views of its YouTube channel in a single month. That was unacceptable to the government. Since the corporate media are not giving them any information, those who need something are going there.

    The corporate media’s approach to the farmers, one, “Oh, these are all rich farmers.” By the way, I put out the figures of what these farmers earn from Punjab, the richest farmers in the country. Their monthly household — and a household has more than five people in Punjab — monthly household income is 18,059 rupees, which is about $250. OK? It’s about $250 a month, for five people, which means a per capita income for each farmer of that farm household of around $50. And look at who directors of the IMF, etc., are writing, condemning: “These are rich farmers.” Guys are writing on Twitter — I mean, these guys are writing on Twitter and Facebook. These guys earn more in an hour than an entire family household of farmers earns in a month, and they are trashing the farmers as “rich farmers.”

    So, you’re looking at the greatest troll army in the world, a hostile corporate media, and a government out to crack independent media. In NewsClick, the problem — I mean, it’s always been a thorn in the side of authority. It has really angered them with its coverage of the farm protests. So, this is the media scenario. And yeah, the media, the main media or the big media, cozy up to the government.

    By the way, you should know that the richest Indian in the world, the richest media owner in India, is also one of the two or three biggest beneficiaries of these farm laws: Mr. Ambani. So, how are — then those media that he does not own, he is very often the biggest advertiser. So, why do you expect better from them?…

  222. says

    Why it matters that some GOP senators huddled with Trump’s lawyers

    Graham, Lee, and Cruz aren’t just ignoring their impeachment oath, they’re flaunting their indifference to their responsibilities.

    Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment proceedings is only a “trial” in a colloquial sense. Many Americans have some sense of how a case is tried in court, and this isn’t it.

    Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.), for example, is overseeing the proceedings, while also serving as a “juror.” He’s also, incidentally, a witness to the crime. In fact, in this case, each of the jurors are witnesses, which in a normal trial would never be permissible.

    […] it stands to reason that there will be dramatic differences in how senators approach their responsibilities. But by any sensible measure, it’s tough to defend tactics like these.

    [Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz] were seen going into a meeting with Trump’s lawyers after the trial wrapped for the day. “We were discussing their strategy for tomorrow and we were sharing our thoughts in terms of where the argument was and where it should go,” Cruz, who’s said he’ll vote to acquit the former president, told reporters afterwards. [Defense attorney David] Schoen said they discussed “procedure.”

    […] Not only did Cruz concede that the GOP senators offered ideas about what the defense attorneys should say, but members of Team Trump publicly thanked the Republicans for their recommendations.

    this is a trial in which three jurors huddled in private with defense attorneys, offering guidance on how best to persuade other jurors.

    […] don’t be too quick to dismiss the private chat as unimportant.

    For one thing, David Schoen seems a little too eager to have it both ways. He’s repeatedly suggested, for example, that an impeachment trial should be seen as an actual trial — with due process in the House, literal criminal charges, etc. — only to turn around and have private, in-person communications with a trio of jurors.

    For another, it’s no small matter that Graham, Lee, and Cruz apparently thought such a meeting was necessary. If Donald Trump’s acquittal were inevitable, and the House impeachment managers’ presentation changed nothing, why bother directing the former president’s defense attorneys?

    But perhaps most important of all is the oath these Senate Republicans swore to uphold.

    Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution reads, “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation.” And what does that oath entail? I’m glad you asked.

    The Senate rules on impeachment trials require members to take this oath: “I solemnly swear (or affirm) that in all things appertaining to the trial of ____, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help me God.” […]

  223. says

    The New Republic’s Matt Ford:

    […] The House managers, for their part, did not merely connect the dots between pieces of evidence or bits of testimony. They just played video clips of what had happened in a stark, simple chronological order. All they needed was the footage of the year Trump spent crafting his “Big Lie” about election fraud, as well as footage of his followers’ unambiguous — and undisputed — belief that he wanted them to commit violence against Congress. They had both. The House managers did not present a theory of Trump’s guilt. They merely showed it. […]

    Trump’s Guilt Is Far Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

    Yet that’s the problem: Senate Republicans are anything but reasonable.

    Commentary:

    […] the Democratic impeachment managers proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt. The arguments floated in defense of the former president lay in ruins.

    Maybe it’s unconstitutional to convict a former official? The claim has been discredited and rejected by a bipartisan majority.

    Maybe Trump had a First Amendment right to incite an insurrectionist riot? This may be a favorite of Trump’s defense lawyers, but it’s been exposed as nonsense. Impeachment managers invested a fair amount of time yesterday explicitly explaining the irrelevance of the First Amendment in this case.

    Maybe an impeachment conviction requires a statutory crime? The managers shredded that, too.

    Maybe Trump didn’t know his followers would launch an attack on the Capitol? Of course he did. The impeachment managers documented the lengthy pattern in which Trump pleaded with his followers to come to D.C. on the day in which lawmakers would certify the results, in order to “stop the steal.” As the trial documented, he cultivated support from extremists for months for this express purpose, feeding them lies and stoking their misguided rage.

    Maybe the Capitol attackers weren’t summoned, but merely came to D.C. on their own? After their arrests, one rioter after another explicitly declared that they were directed by their president. They were there at Trump’s request and instruction. During their attack, they repeatedly said they were following Trump’s instructions.

    Maybe the riot was some kind of aberration? If only that were true. “These tactics were road tested,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) explained, after pointing to extensive evidence. “January 6 was a culmination of the president’s actions, not an aberration from them. The insurrection was the most violent and dangerous episode so far in Donald Trump’s continuing pattern and practice of inciting violence.”

    Maybe Trump’s “fight” rhetoric was routine? It’s a ludicrous defense based on the idea that context has no meaning.

    […] As a Washington Post editorial put it, “Senators will bring disgrace upon their chamber if they fail to hold the former president accountable. No reasonable listener this week could fail to find him culpable for the Capitol assault.” E.J. Dionne added that the Democratic impeachment managers took great pains to “close off the escape hatches and back doors for Senate Republicans.”

    In all likelihood, these GOP “jurors” will express nothing but indifference to Trump’s obvious guilt. The shame will follow them indefinitely.

    But in the meantime, I hope they’ll remember a question Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) posed to senators yesterday: “We humbly, humbly ask you to convict President Trump for the crime for which he is overwhelmingly guilty of. Because if you don’t, if we pretend this didn’t happen or worse if we let it go unanswered, who’s to say it won’t happen again?”

    Link

  224. says

    Meadows Attempts To Rewrite History By Claiming Trump ‘Didn’t Delay’ National Guard During Riot

    Yep, Trump’s lickspittles are still going on Fox News to peddle lies, lies and more lies.

    Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows is still running to former President Donald Trump’s side to advance false information around how Trump handled the deadly Capitol riot that unfolded under his command.

    Meadows made an appearance on Fox News on Thursday night in a breathless effort to rewrite history, falsely suggesting that Trump had not delayed activating the National Guard as a mob of his own supporters overwhelmed law enforcement and violently stormed the Capitol.

    […] “He didn’t delay at all, and so for them to put forth this narrative that’s not based on fact is a sad day,” Meadows said, adding: “he wanted our National Guard to be on the ready for any civil unrest that might be there.”

    The comments come after House impeachment manager Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) argued a case on Thursday that claimed the former president had “delighted” in watching his supporters lay siege on the Capitol and did little to stop them.

    “We all know that President Trump had the power to stop these attacks. He was our commander in chief. He had the power to assess the security situation, send backup, send help. He also had incited this violent attack. They were listening to him. He could have commanded them to leave,” Cicilline argued on Thursday. “But he didn’t.”

    Meadows’ claim that Trump quickly activated the National Guard contradicts multiple reports from defense and administration offficials who have uniformly said that it was Vice President Mike Pence who approved the order to deploy the D.C. National Guard and that Trump who was reportedly glued to the TV watching his supporters lay siege on the Capitol in his name was ultimately bypassed in the decision.

    Additional reporting from The New York Times on the day of the attack, indicated that President Trump had in fact initially resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard, and that intervention had been required from the White House counsel, Pat Cipollone, among other officials, to ensure that forces could be deployed.

    […] The Post’s reporting also challenges Meadows’ after-the-fact suggestion that Trump had been quick to quell the violence, by outlining how House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) had made repeated efforts to reach the President and pleaded with Jared Kushner, one of the President’s senior advisers, to convince Trump to issue a statement demanding that supporters leave the Capitol.

    In spite of all this, Meadows persisted on Thursday, minimizing the violence by saying, what happened “actually was not as graphic as was laid out over the last couple of days,” and by hammering the unsupported point that Trump “wanted to make sure that we respect law and order and was very forceful in that.”

  225. says

    Mark Sumner:

    […] Imagine going to a trial in which the defendant is charged with multiple, monstrous crimes. Then, as the prosecutors are laying out the facts of the case—including the most compelling evidence that reveals details previously unknown to the public—looking over to see that half the jury isn’t even paying attention. One is doodling on a notepad. Another is playing a silly game designed for children. Others are snickering to each other and passing notes.

    As it turns out, no imagination is required. Because that’s exactly how Republicans have treated this trial. As House managers showed how the police lines were being forced, Josh Hawley moved back into the viewing gallery to play. As they described the incredibly close call between Pence and rioters seeking to murder him, Rand Paul was doodling his next hair style. As House managers showed how Trump had constantly not just overlooked violence by his supporters, but encouraged it, Lindsey Graham, who was a House impeachment manager for the impeachment of Bill Clinton, was chortling over his chance to show disdain for the current trial.

    Despite the way that Republicans have reacted, it’s clear that the House team laid out a compelling case immediately understandable not just in the Senate, but to the public.

    But going into Friday, Trump’s legal team let it be known that their presentation may be as brief as three hours. Some of that time will likely be devoted to rehashing their nonsensical arguments about how the First Amendment protects calling for violence. Or pretending that Trump acted to do something, anything, to end the insurgency. But most of the reply from Bruce Castor and David Schoen is likely to be a funhouse mirror version of the House case.

    It can be expected that they will show video of Democratic candidates urging their supporters to “fight” or “never give up.” It can be expected they’ll intersperse unconnected clips of violence from protests in Seattle or Portland or, based on other recent Republican ads, from any number of foreign countries. And because this presentation is going to be 100% aimed at giving Republican senators talking points on Fox News, it’s an easy bet it will play heavily into existing memes around women of color. Expect to see Rep. Maxine Waters, Rep. Ilhan Omar, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, all saying things that Trump’s team will indicate are somehow “worse” than anything Trump said.

    Expect to see random images of violence taken out of context, with Black Lives Matter marches put next to images of burning stores. Or black-suited figures identified as “antifa.” Expect to see a video, and a presentation, that leans heavily into the racist message that Fox News has already been selling for at least as long as Trump had been grooming his supporters—that BLM marchers are destructive and violent, and that Democratic officials have encouraged them in that violence. Expect to hear a claim that Vice President Kamala Harris asking for support in bailing out protesters was just putting violent extremists back on the street to commit more crimes.

    […] Trump’s team could use their three hours to recite recipes, or promote the next season of Hannity, or simply provide the details for the next assault on the Capitol.

    […] Republicans don’t have any question about Trump’s guilt. But they seem shockingly willing to convict themselves.

    Link

    Laurence Tribe:

    I’ve closely studied every impeachment trial in our history. No impeachment has ever been as ably prosecuted in the Senate. In no prior impeachment has a conviction been as overwhelmingly justified. Now the Senate is on trial. To acquit itself, it must convict Donald J. Trump.

  226. blf says

    Not at all political (barring any possible contentious choice of name), Andy Flurry and Mary Queen of Salt: craze for naming Scottish gritters goes global:

    […]
    It started as a winter safety campaign for school children living in the Scottish Highlands but has since captured the urgent need for escapism during lockdown.

    Hundreds of thousands of people are now following the daily journeys of nearly 100 Scottish gritter lorries and snowploughs, vehicles luxuriating in names such as Spreddie Van Halen, Sir Andy Flurry, Skid Vicious, Gritallica and Mary Queen of Salt.

    With much of Scotland gripped by the heaviest winter snow since the “beast from the east” three years ago, gritters are working round the clock on the country’s motorways and trunk roads, their every mile visible on an online tracker.

    “Megameltasaurus” is one of the gritters currently being shown, as is “Hansel and Grit-All” and others.

    […]
    News of the tracker, set up five years ago by Transport Scotland, a government agency, has spread worldwide. It has a small fanbase in California, and became more famous in the US when an ecstatic TikTok user, @chibichan_777, spotted that one gritter was called Gritney Spears.

    In one 24-hour period a week ago, the tracker site had more than 110,000 hits and has attracted interest from radio stations in the US and Russia. By contrast, it usually has about 700,000 hits across a 365-day period, excluding the summer months when the tracker is offline and the gritters shuttered away.

    […]

  227. says

    Biden to begin admitting migrants forced by Trump to wait in Mexico

    It’s part of the new administration’s work to undo the former president’s immigration legacy and end the Migrant Protection Protocols program.

    The Biden administration will soon begin allowing migrants into the U.S. who, because of a Trump-era policy, have been forced to remain in Mexico while their asylum cases are processed.

    As part of the new administration’s efforts to overhaul the immigration system, the Department of Homeland Security, starting next Friday, will begin the first phase of a program to gradually let in migrants with active cases under the Trump administration’s “Remain in Mexico” policy.

    […] “This latest action is another step in our commitment to reform immigration policies that do not align with our nation’s values,” DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a statement.

    But Mayorkas warned that the administration’s latest step did not mean the border would be open to all migrants, and said that “changes will take time” — the latest warning from Biden administration officials for migrants not to come now.

    “Individuals who are not eligible under this initial phase should wait for further instructions and not travel to the border. Due to the current pandemic, restrictions at the border remain in place and will be enforced,” Mayorkas said,[…]

    There are about 25,000 migrants with active cases under MPP, but the new program will first focus on those who have been waiting in the program the longest and vulnerable populations […]

    The Biden administration’s plan is to work with the Mexican government, international organizations and nongovernmental organizations in Mexico to identify eligible migrants and begin transporting them to certain ports of entry to process their cases and let them into the U.S. […]

    Migrants with active cases should not go to a U.S. port of entry until they receive guidance, administration officials said. Those in the first phase will be processed at three ports of entry in the first phase, with most of the work being done at two ports. (The administration officials would not disclose which are the three ports.) Officials said that once processing was up and running, they expected to be able to process up to 300 people a day at each of the two main ports. […]

  228. blf says

    ‘I’ve Been Plotting’: Lead Stop the Steal Organizer Promises to Restart Rallies, Punish His Enemies, and Build New Society for Trump Supporters (RWW edits in {curly braces}):

    Ali Alexander, the lead organizer of the so-called Stop the Steal campaign, has resurfaced after going into hiding following the Jan 6 insurrection at the US Capitol. […] Alexander claimed […] he has been plotting to restart rallies in March, abolish the media, and build a separate society for Trump supporters.

    […]

    Following Jan 6, Alexander was booted off most major social media platforms and, as a result, is now streaming on Trovo, a gaming platform that appears to be growing in popularity among far-right actors kicked off other platforms. On Wednesday night, Alexander lamented the racist, bigoted, anti-Christian, anti-Southern, anti-Republican, anti-conservative, anti-human smear machine that he says targeted him [this nutter is deep into projection! –blf], and he promised to create chaos. We’ve got to get back in the driver’s seat, he added.

    They’ve done a great number on my life, they’ve cost me tens of thousands of dollars, they’ve really destroyed parts of my life, but in a lot of ways, I have no other choice but to announce that I’m building the future, so I’m making strategic investments in tools that fight deplatforming and to create chaos on existing platforms, Alexander claimed.

    […]

    Alexander said he had been plotting how to do away with the free press and other systems that control us: […] I’ve been planning, I’ve been scheming because we have to do away with this whole system. The free press is not free, and they’re not the press, they need to be abolished. The systems that control us have to be abolished.

    I’m going to create a society, and a community, and a culture, and a language for {Trump supporters}, and there are tens of millions of us. … Winning can just be 10 million people creating a new megacity,” he mused. Let’s build our own city, let’s seriously build our own city, let’s build a back-up city in South America.

    There already is such a city in S.America, Americana, São Paulo, Brazil. Founded by defeated slaveowners (Confederados) after the war to end slavery in the States. They fly what is presumably this nutter’s favourite flag, and on and on.

    [… some indecipherable gibberish about the insurrection being a premeditated psyop…]

    Ahead of the Capitol insurrection, Alexander embraced increasingly violent rhetoric, calling for revolution and rebellion. A short distance away from the White House the day before the insurrection, Alexander started a Victory or death! chant at a Stop the Steal rally. Our government is only our government if it is legitimate, he declared at that rally. 1776 is always an option.

    After the violence at the Capitol, Alexander posted a since-deleted video of himself saying I don’t disavow this. I do not denounce this. He encouraged viewers to tune into his Stop the Steal website, which he called the home of the rebellion against an illegitimate government.

  229. blf says

    The Onion, Ted Cruz Deeply Disturbed By Part Of Capitol Riot Video Where Chuck Schumer Not Beaten To Death:

    Squeezing his eyes shut in response to the harrowing Capitol riot footage, Sen Ted Cruz (R-TX) was reportedly deeply disturbed Thursday by the part of the video where Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was not beaten to death. “Oh God, no, he’s going to escape — I can’t look!” said Cruz, who was beyond horrified as he watched the video showing Schumer and his security detail fleeing down a hallway after coming within just yards of the conservative mob. […] At press time, Cruz had left the Senate chamber to catch his breath in the rotunda after getting to the part of the footage where the rioters didn’t parade Schumer’s lifeless body around on their shoulders.

  230. blf says

    A snippet from Romesh Ranganathan in the Grauniad, When even my key-worker mother started to question the vaccine, I had to act:

    There are people who may believe that this is a scheme by the government to tag you, or poison you, or keep tabs on you. My immediate counterargument would be to point out the level of competence the [“U”K] government has shown when organising things openly; the idea that it would be capable of putting something together that would require that level of forethought and sophistication seems improbable. There may be others who believe that the whole thing is a hoax, in order to instil fear as a control mechanism. I would love to hear more on this, so please contact me to elaborate at [email protected].

  231. says

    This both laughable and horrifying: Trump Defense Turns Reality Upside Down To Cast Former President As Champion Of Peace

    From the start of the Trump defense team’s presentation Friday, the former president’s lawyers hit senators hard with a wave of false equivalencies and bogus claims that Donald Trump, in fact, was the messenger of peace seeking to calm America’s political waters from the turmoil created by violent Democrats.

    “Contrast the President’s repeated condemnations of violence with the rhetoric from his opponents,” Trump attorney Michael van der Veen said before gesturing dramatically to a video montage.

    What ensued was a mash-up of clips from protests during the course of 2020 and Trump’s response to them, touting his enthusiasm for “law and order.” The phrase, of course, was and remains Trump’s shorthand for crushing liberal protesters, especially the Black Lives Matter movement — not a plea for peace.

    The very first clip in van der Veen’s montage, for example, showed Trump saying “I am your president of law and order, and an ally of all peaceful protesters.”

    The video ignored the reality that within minutes of Trump reciting that line, law enforcement had used flash bang grenades and chemical irritants to clear peaceful Black Lives Matter demonstrators from Lafayette Square in Washington, D.C., so that Trump and top administration officials could walk to St. John’s church, for a photo-op in which Trump posed with a Bible.

    […] The lawyers’ montage then cut to a clip of Joe Biden saying that “the vast majority of the protesters are being peaceful” — an indisputably true claim that, nonetheless, the montage contrasted with quick-cut scenes of chaos and violence.

    The montage then clipped House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) saying in 2018, “I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country.”

    Unmentioned: She was referring to widespread outrage over the Trump administration’s family separation policy at the border with Mexico, which was ongoing at the time. “They’re doing away with children being with their moms,” Pelosi said just prior to the clipped quote.

    And so on, and so on. It’s predictable, sure, that Trump’s defense team didn’t show clips of him celebrating protesters at his rallies being beaten by his supporters, or praising supporters of his that beat up “antifa scum” in the streets.

    But, from the start, the defense strategy appears to be not one of addressing the specific charges at issue — that Trump brought a mob to Washington and then incited it — but rather a wholesale denial of reality, casting the former president as peacemaker.

  232. says

    Follow-up to comment 338.

    From comments posted by readers of the TPM article:

    Propaganda need not be true, just effective with the audience you want to reach. If Senators and Trump supporters want this as an excuse, they will take it. But most people will rightly dismiss it.
    —————
    War is peace, and work makes you free!
    ——————-
    So the defense strategy is “gaslight the m***** f*****s”?
    ——————–
    This is about just pasting together enough out of context snippets of video to “prove” Trump’s lack of culpability to the Fox crowd. That, combined with the votes from enough corrupt R senators, will do enough for this entire thing to be swept under the rug, at least so far as the RW narrative is concerned.

    As with the entirety of Trump’s presidency, the rest of the country, and our Constitution, can be damned so far as they are concerned.

  233. says

    Oh, FFS.

    […] The new rationale goes something like this: House Democrats have done such an excellent job of indicting Trump in the court of public opinion that Senate Republicans now have no need to convict in order to prevent him from holding office again. Here’s an unnamed Republican senator making the case to The Hill: “Unwittingly, they are doing us a favor. They’re making Donald Trump disqualified to run for president” even if he is acquitted, the senator said.

    Voila! No need for elected GOP officials to lift a finger. Ha—those silly House Democrats putting in all the time and effort and political risk.

    During the last impeachment, a prominent GOP point of view pushed by Sen. Susan Collins of Maine was that Trump had certainly learned his lesson by being impeached, so a Senate conviction wasn’t necessary. Brilliant!

    Now Republicans are back for round two: Voters have certainly learned their lesson, so … no need for conviction! Yippee!

    “I can’t imagine the emotional reaction, the visceral reaction to what we saw today doesn’t have people thinking, ‘This is awful,’ whatever their view is on whether the president ought to be impeached or convicted,” said another GOP senator.

    Agree. Voters across the country are thinking, “That was awful. Ya know, someone should really do something about that.” But according to GOP lawmakers, that’s where the intellectual trail of voters dries up. They’ll never make the leap to, “And ya know who should f’ing do something about that—the public servants we elected to run this country.”

    “This is very damaging to any future political race for President Trump,” the senator added. Indeed.

    […] “After the American public sees the full story laid out here … I don’t see how Donald Trump could be reelected to the presidency again,” Murkowski told reporters Wednesday.

    Let’s stop right here to recall the cautionary words of House impeachment manager Rep. Ted Lieu of California: “I’m not afraid of Donald Trump running again in four years. I’m afraid he’s going to run again and lose, because he can do this again.” […]

    Link

  234. says

    Rex Huppke:

    I’m exhausted by many things, but none more so than seeing Democratic lawyers make smart, sound, passionate arguments and then seeing GOP lawyers effectively fart in a bag and leave the room while GOP lawmakers say, “Well, that’s good enough for me. The Democrats have no case.”

  235. says

    Excerpts from a longer Wonkette article:

    […] Yelling incoherently about due process seems to be a favorite tactic when we’re having Trump impeachment trials. One of the dumber arguments in Trump Impeachment 1.0 was that the House didn’t do due process because they didn’t get to present their case during the House’s impeachment process, because that’s not how impeachment works.

    Now, they’re saying “NO DUE PROCESS” because, as best I can gather, Trump himself didn’t get to make all of the decisions about the Senate trial?

    It’s dumb. It makes no sense. They’re trying to make an analogy to criminal law, but an impeachment trial simply isn’t the same thing as a criminal trial. And Trump’s lawyers are getting the same amount of time as the House managers got to present their case. That is due process in this kind of proceeding. It’s not new. It’s how things have always been.

    Like Greg Weiner wrote before Trump’s first annual impeachment trial, “Due process protects the life, liberty, and property of private citizens. It does not create a right to occupy the White House.”

    These guys (except maybe Bruce Castor) understand that this isn’t a criminal trial. If it were a criminal trial, members of the jury wouldn’t be working with Trump’s lawyers to decide which arguments to present. That’s what we in the legal field call a “no-no.” […]

    “CONSTITUTIONAL CANCEL CULTURE!”

    “FIRST AMENDMENT!”

    We are going to keep hearing this until the cows come home, become Nazis, and register as Republicans. The president and his lawyers have decided that Donald Trump can say whatever he wants, without any repercussions ever, because FREE SPEECH!

    We all know that free speech does not mean that every person is free to say whatever they want, without ever facing any accountability for what they have said. The common go-to is shouting fire in a crowded theater (which apparently was actually a real problem back in the day that killed hundreds of people, who knew?!), but what Trump did was SO MUCH WORSE than that.

    Donald Trump purposefully incited a violent mob to take over our Capitol building to try to murder our lawmakers so he could get his way. It is unconscionable. And it was exactly what those of us who had been paying attention had warned about all along, only to be accused of having “Trump derangement syndrome.”

    Raskin: “This case is much worse than someone who falsely shouts fire in a crowded theater. It’s more like like a case where the town fire chief, who’s paid to put out fires, sends a mob not to yell fire in a crowded theater, but to actually set the theater on fire.” […]

    https://www.wonkette.com/impeachment-dumb-args-redux

  236. says

    More from Wonkette … just for the fun and the snark:

    12:05 Oh, here we go. Attorney Michael van der Veen is up to denounce this appalling act of “political vengeance.” WITCH HUNT! THE LEFT! SLANDER! RUSSIA! Donald Trump is a man of peace. How was he to know that the crowd of enraged lunatics he sent to march on congress would … march on congress and act like lunatics?

    LOL, he’s making a bizarre argument that Trump was just exhorting them to pass voter ID laws “in the next election.”

    On the plus side, this atorney seems to have written his remarks out this time, so we’re spared freeform blarping about Rome or whatever.

    […] 12:15 And now we’re getting supercut of Trump reading paeans to “Law and Order” with Democrats expressing support for BLM. Also Chris Cuomo. Good we’re getting this campaign ad for a guy who already lost.

    Anyway, van der Veen says a small group “of various different stripes and political persuasions … hijacked” the event. He blames antifa, of course.

    12:18 See, it’s Democrats’ fault that rioters stormed the Capitol because they objected to Trump teargassing racial justice protestors. Lock up Mayor Muriel Bowser!

    12:20 Nancy Pelosi is the real inciter. Also the national news media, for reporting on Russian political interference. Democrats supported “riots that destroyed vast swathes of American cities.”

    As the resident of an American city that is often invoked in these situations, let me offer a hearty FUCK YOU, Mr. van der Veen.

    12:22 The theme of the day is CULTURE WAR.

    “Constitutional cancel culture!” Because if we impeach Trump, we’re really impeaching the “75 million” (not really) Trump voters.

    “Unlike the left, President Trump has been consistent in his opposition to mob violence.” You know, like the time he offered to pay the bills of his fans who beat up protesters at his rallies.

    12:28 David Schoen is up to tell us more about how Trump couldn’t possibly have incited a riot because he loves police so much.

    But first he’s going to holler some more about that due process he cares about so much.

    12:30 While Schoen is yelling about something or other — he’s mad right now about the videos, says they were withheld UNFAIR — can we just point out that Trump was offered the chance to testify in his own defense and declined. He had a chance to defend himself; he chose not to.

    12:32 Now we’re yelling about due process in court. This is not a court, it’s congress.

    Also, Schoen is real mad about reliance on news reports which are uncorroborated. Then he goes on to accuse House managers of doctoring tweets and videos. Without proof, natch.

    Josh Hawley did the same thing. Hawley claimed that Democrats were making things up.

    LOL, he’s accusing Raskin of manufacturing graphics because they recreated tweets. BECAUSE TRUMP’S ACCOUNT DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE.

    12:40 OMG OMG OMG! They’re actually arguing with a straight face that this nitwit Trump retweeted, the one who organized the march, was bringing JESUS, aka “calvary”, not just botching the spelling of “cavalry.” […]

    Link

  237. says

    Washington Post: A running tally of Trump’s misleading impeachment defense

    — […] the case to prove Trump indeed incited the violence of Jan. 6 has hinges on the concept that words, and more importantly context, matter.

    Trump’s defense team has responded by arguing the House managers took Trump’s remarks out of context — and offered its own series of clips. But these often were taken out of context.

    The Facts
    “I wanna tell you Gorsuch, I wanna tell you Kavanaugh; you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you, if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
    — Then-Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), March 4, 2020.

    On March 4, 2020, Schumer appeared on the steps of the Supreme Court while it heard arguments in June Medical Services v. Russo, a landmark abortion case from Louisiana. Schumer’s rhetoric that day was more than just heated, and his direct threat of on Supreme Court Justices Brett M. Kavanaugh and Neil M. Gorsuch — was widely criticized. Ultimately, context matters, and Schumer apologized the next day on the Senate floor saying he “misspoke.”

    His act of showing remorse wasn’t enough for the then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who admonished Schumer saying the language could have been “a matter of deadly seriousness,” […] But Schumer did quickly apologize, something Trump has yet to do.

    “I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country. And maybe there will be.” — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), during her weekly news conference, June 14, 2018.

    Pelosi’s 2018 remarks have often been circulated by Republicans in the context of the protests related to racial justice in the summer of 2020. But they were made in relation to Trump administration’s immigrant child separation border policy. The then House minority leader’s rhetorical tone was one of outrage over what she characterized as a “barbaric” policy of separating migrant children from their parents after illegally entering the country to seeks asylum. Her references to “uprisings” in this instance are directly in relation to the outrage that would stem from the public. […]

    Link

  238. says

    blf @ #332:

    There already is such a city in S.America, Americana, São Paulo, Brazil. Founded by defeated slaveowners (Confederados) after the war to end slavery in the States. They fly what is presumably this nutter’s favourite flag, and on and on.

    There’s also Nueva Germania in Paraguay. It’s telling how they think about South America.

  239. blf says

    Lynna@343, quotes a description of hair furor’s defense, “WITCH HUNT! THE LEFT! SLANDER! RUSSIA!”
    Benghazi !

  240. blf says

    SC@346, Also Colonia Dignidad (now known as Villa Baviera) in Chile, albeit that one is more recent than the other examples, founded by actual nazis from Europe at the end of WW ][. It was a torture facility during the Pinochet era.

  241. says

    Quoted in blf’s #332:

    Trovo, a gaming platform that appears to be growing in popularity among far-right actors kicked off other platforms

    At this point, you could string together any series of letters/numbers/symbols followed by “a…platform that appears to be growing in popularity among far-right actors” or “a hosting service making itself available to the far right” or “a payment app increasingly used by rightwing organizations” and I would accept it. It seems like every day they find a new one.

  242. says

    Ryan Goodman:

    Trump’s lawyer [Castor]:

    “Clearly there was no insurrection.”

    U.S. Department of Justice Jan. 14:

    “The crimes charged in the indictment involve active participation in an insurrection attempting to violently overthrow the United States Government.”

  243. blf says

    Some unhinged ranting found at site I won’t link to:

    Biden Takes ‘Death to America’ Terrorists Off Terror List, Replaces Them With Republicans

    […]

    The Biden administration responded to protests against its stolen election by embedding a domestic extremism office into the National Security Council. The man in charge of making it happen, Joshua Geltzer, had previously denied that Black Lives Matter was a terrorist threat and had attacked the Trump administration’s response to Antifa and BLM violence in Portland.

    That means that the only domestic extremists the NSC will be fighting are Republicans.

    Even while the Biden administration is preparing to double down on Obama’s abuse of the national security state to target his political opponents, it’s also giving real terrorists a pass.

    Joe Biden, whose biggest bundlers included the Iran Lobby, announced he was ending support for American allies fighting the Houthis, and then went even further by preparing to remove the terrorist organization whose motto is, “Death to America”, which took American hostages and tried to kill American sailors, from the list of designated foreign terrorist organizations.

    […]

    [… T]he Biden administration isn’t even going to pretend to care about attacks on our military.

    The Bidenites are claiming that they’re taking the Houthis, whom they don’t deny are terrorists, off the list of designated terrorist groups because of the “humanitarian consequences”.

    That’s a lie, no matter how often you hear it in the media, because Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the United States would be providing licenses to “humanitarian activities conducted by non-governmental organizations in Yemen and to certain transactions and activities related to exports to Yemen of critical commodities like food and medicine.”

    That’s despite the fact that the humanitarian crisis in Yemen was caused by the Houthis.

    Nevertheless the media, echoing propaganda from the Iran Lobby and Qatar, a close terrorist ally of Iran, has falsely claimed that the Houthis are the victims of the Yemen famine. A number of politicians, mostly Democrats, but some Republicans, as well as various aid groups, have pushed this same disinformation campaign about the causes of the Yemen famine.

    America and its allies have spent billions providing food, medicine, and other humanitarian aid to Yemen. That aid has been seized by the Houthis who have used it for their own troops or to resell on the black market. This is a familiar problem from Syria to Somalia, and aid groups have refused to honestly address their complicity in aiding the terrorists who caused the crisis.

    [… and on and on and on. and on, in an increasingly unhinged manner…]

    Also, Benghazi !
    (And nowhere in the rant is the claim teh thugs are being put on some terror list “discussed”.)

  244. says

    Senators are now asking questions of both sides. They submit them to Leahy, specifying which side the question is for; the clerk reads the question; and the lawyers for whichever side have 5 minutes to answer.

    This part lasts for four hours. (I’ll note one more time that it was during this portion of the previous impeachment that Rand Paul tried to get the supposed name of the whistleblower read out loud during the trial, because he’s a terrible person.)

  245. johnson catman says

    Cops getting away with assaulting a 75 year-old man:

    Criminal charges have been dropped against two police officers seen on video last spring shoving a 75-year-old protester to the ground in Buffalo, New York, prosecutors said Thursday.
    .
    Messages seeking comment were left with lawyers representing the officers. One of them, Thomas Burton, has previously said that it was a “real stretch in our view to suggest that they intended to hurt this man.”

    https://www.wral.com/charges-dropped-for-officers-seen-shoving-buffalo-protester/19522384/
    Whether they “intended” to hurt the man or not should not matter. They assaulted him and his skull was fractured.

  246. says

    Collins and Murkowski just asked Trump’s lawyers what Trump did to respond to the insurrection and when, asking them to be as detailed as possible. The lawyer had 5 minutes to answer. He got up there and said (lied) that the House managers had produced no evidence concerning it, then said that because the process was allegedly rushed, the evidence hadn’t been developed. But they’re Trump’s lawyers! His response, all of about 30 seconds, made it plain that they couldn’t answer that question as it would further inculpate Trump.

  247. says

    Wow. Trump lawyers have no explanation of what Trump knew on day of Capitol riot or what he did to stop it beyond a single tweet. Stunning.

    For those not watching, Sen. Collins asked when Trump learned of the breach and what he did to stop it. Trump’s side pointed to a single tweet and said the House managers haven’t investigated enough and this is all moving too fast”

  248. says

    Romney and Collins are asking both sides “When Trump sent the disparaging 2:24 PM tweet re Pence, was he aware that Pence had been removed from the chamber for his own safety?”

  249. says

    Finally – Castro is bringing up the Tuberville interview and the timeline it provides. Excellent.

    Trump’s lawyers: “The answer is no. At no point was the president informed that the VP was in any danger.” But he seems to be saying that he wasn’t informed in the sense that the House managers didn’t demonstrate that he was (which is false). Now he’s talking about the “rushed” process again. Wow, this is a weird and really inculpatory response.

  250. says

    Follow-up to blf @346.

    […] Echoing language that was once frequently used by his client, Trump defense lawyer Michael Van der Veen blasted the Democrats’ impeachment case against Trump as an “unjust and blatantly unconstitutional act of political vengeance” and a divisive “politically motivated witch hunt.” The trial, Van der Veen said, amounted to “constitutional cancel culture.”

    No, really, that’s what he said.

    I made the case this morning that every credible argument in defense of Trump had already been thoroughly discredited by House impeachment managers over the course of their two-day presentation. Helping bolster the point, the former president’s defense team found it necessary to concoct an alternate reality, unrecognizable to those who live in this reality.

    Team Trump asked senators to believe that it was antifa members who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6. And that the former president received 75 million votes. And that Trump’s remarks about Charlottesville weren’t as offensive as the American mainstream thought they were.

    None of these claims were true, of course, but the former president’s lawyers didn’t seem overly concerned with such pesky details.

    In this alternate reality, when references to “bringing the cavalry” on Jan. 6 was actually a reference to the location of Jesus’s crucifixion. In this same version of reality, it was Democrats who presented selectively edited footage — according to defense attorneys who, at the time, were presenting footage selectively edited to suggest Democrats endorsed acts of political violence.

    Trump’s attorneys seemed especially interested in a video montage of Democrats using the word “fight” in a variety of contexts, which might’ve been more compelling if any of those instances led a mob to commit acts of violence. (There’s a reason “whataboutism” was trending on Twitter this afternoon.)

    But on and on the defense team went. Did you know that there wasn’t actually an “insurrection” on Jan. 6? Because that’s the reality Trump’s lawyers want senators to believe. It’s the same reality in which Trump had a First Amendment right to incite a riot, the Russia scandal wasn’t real, and the former president said nothing wrong when demanding election officials in Georgia “find” votes that would flip the state in his favor.

    This was not a presentation for serious people engaged in a serious process. It was a political spectacle intended to provide cover for partisans and satisfy the whims of an unhinged client.

    The defense attorneys, who were allotted 16 hours for arguments, rested after using less than three hours. It brought to mind a famous congressional expression: “When you have the votes, vote. If you don’t have the votes, talk.”

    In this case, Trump’s lawyers figure they have the votes, so there simply wasn’t any point to talking. They may very well be right: most Senate Republicans made up their minds about the trial’s outcome long before the proceedings began.

    But winning the political fight and winning on the merits are often two entirely different things.

    Link

  251. says

    I think van der Veen is suggesting Tuberville lied or something. This “defense” is ridiculously, shamefully bad.

    Raskin is pointing out that Trump declined the invitation to testify. And using some sharp rhetoric to boot (van der Veen said this was his worst experience in DC – “Well, you should have been here on the 6th”; Trump responded more quickly to the invitation to testify than he did to the insurrection). He’s on fire.

  252. says

    Jonathan Turley tweeted: “Van der Veen just snapped at a senator with ‘who asked that?’ That is not just disrespectful but highly damaging for the defense. He appears to be getting increasingly angry. A president accused of incitement hardly needs a lawyer struggling with anger management.”

    LOL.

  253. Nerd of Redhead, Dances OM Trolls says

    SC@377 I hope to see a replay of that night. I love seeing trolls getting shown their ignorance of facts.

  254. says

    Josh Dawsey, WaPo:

    Pence’s team does not agree with the Trump lawyer’s assessment that Trump was concerned about Pence’s safety. Trump didn’t call him that day — or for five days after that. No one else on Trump’s team called as Pence was evacuated to one room & another, with screaming mob nearby.

  255. says

    CNN (so far unconfirmed) – “New details about Trump-McCarthy shouting match show Trump refused to call off the rioters”:

    In an expletive-laced phone call with House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy while the Capitol was under attack, then-President Donald Trump said the rioters cared more about the election results than McCarthy did.

    “Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are,” Trump said, according to lawmakers who were briefed on the call afterward by McCarthy.

    McCarthy insisted that the rioters were Trump’s supporters and begged Trump to call them off.

    Trump’s comment set off what Republican lawmakers familiar with the call described as a shouting match between the two men. A furious McCarthy told the President the rioters were breaking into his office through the windows, and asked Trump, “Who the f–k do you think you are talking to?” according to a Republican lawmaker familiar with the call.

    The newly revealed details of the call, described to CNN by multiple Republicans briefed on it, provide critical insight into the President’s state of mind as rioters were overrunning the Capitol. The existence of the call and some of its details have been previously reported and discussed publicly by McCarthy.

    The Republican members of Congress said the exchange showed Trump had no intention of calling off the rioters even as lawmakers were pleading with him to intervene. Several said it amounted to a dereliction of his presidential duty.

    “He is not a blameless observer, he was rooting for them,” a Republican member of Congress said. “On January 13, Kevin McCarthy said on the floor of the House that the President bears responsibility and he does.”

    Speaking to the President from inside the besieged Capitol, McCarthy pressed Trump to call off his supporters and engaged in a heated disagreement about who comprised the crowd. Trump’s comment about the would-be insurrectionists caring more about the election results than McCarthy did was first mentioned by Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, a Republican from Washington state, in a town hall earlier this week, and was confirmed to CNN by Herrera Beutler and other Republicans briefed on the conversation.

    “You have to look at what he did during the insurrection to confirm where his mind was at,” Herrera Beutler, one of 10 House Republicans who voted last month to impeach Trump, told CNN. “That line right there demonstrates to me that either he didn’t care, which is impeachable, because you cannot allow an attack on your soil, or he wanted it to happen and was OK with it, which makes me so angry.”

    “We should never stand for that, for any reason, under any party flag,” she added, voicing her extreme frustration: “I’m trying really hard not to say the F-word.”

    “I think it speaks to the former President’s mindset,” said Rep. Anthony Gonzalez, an Ohio Republican who also voted to impeach Trump last month. “He was not sorry to see his unyieldingly loyal vice president or the Congress under attack by the mob he inspired. In fact, it seems he was happy about it or at the least enjoyed the scenes that were horrifying to most Americans across the country.”

    As senators prepare to determine Trump’s fate, multiple Republicans thought the details of the call were important to the proceedings because they believe it paints a damning portrait of Trump’s lack of action during the attack. At least one of the sources who spoke to CNN took detailed notes of McCarthy’s recounting of the call….

  256. says

    Update to #387 – Republican Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, who voted to impeach Trump, has issued a statement: “Herrera Beutler Again Confirms Conversation with McCarthy Regarding January 6th U.S.Capitol Attack”:

    To confirm again, here are the details:

    When McCarthy finally reached the president on January 6 and asked him to publicly and forcefully call off the riot, the president initially repeated the falsehood that it was antifa that had breached the Capitol. McCarthy refuted that and told the president that these were Trump supporters. That’s when, according to McCarthy, the president said: “Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are.”

    Since I publicly announced my decision to vote for impeachment, I have shared these details in countless conversations with constituents and colleagues, and multiple times through the media and other public forums.

    I told it to the Daily News of Longview on January 17. I’ve shared it with local county Republican executive board members, as well as other constituents who ask me to explain my vote. I shared it with thousands of residents on my telephone town hall on February 8.

    And to the patriots who were standing next to the former president as these conversations were happening, or even to the former vice president: if you have something to add here, now would be the time.

    (The wording is slightly different because it’s from her FB post rather than the tweet at the link.)

  257. says

    Philadelphia City Commissioner Al Schmidt tweeted: “@LeaderMcConnell The former POTUS incited supporters to threaten to kill my children and put their ‘heads on spikes’ because we counted votes cast by eligible voters. They named my children and included my home address in the threats. Please consider when voting your conscience.”

  258. blf says

    Dave Hayes Says God Will Compel the Military to Remove Biden From Office:

    Dave Hayes, a self-declared prophet, Christian author, and leading online QAnon activist who is better known as the Praying Medic, has been rather quiet ever since former President [sic] Donald Trump left office, likely because none of the bold predictions Hayes made about Trump arresting and executing his political enemies ever came true.

    […]

    We’re getting to a point where the military I don’t think is going to have a choice but to step in, Hayes insisted. I think the military will be compelled to step in. Sort of like if you’ve read how, in the Old Testament, God would draw a king into battle against another king even though that king wouldn’t necessarily want to get into that battle, God has a way of making it happen. I think even if the military is not interested in getting involved in this whole Joe Biden administration, I think God is going to make it so that they don’t have a choice.

  259. blf says

    The Onion, Lindsey Graham Hisses Directions At Attorneys Messing Up Speech They Spent Hours Rehearsing:

    Appearing to lose patience as the defense presented its arguments in President Trump’s impeachment trial Friday, Sen Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was repeatedly overheard hissing directions at lawyers as they messed up the speeches he spent hours rehearsing with them the night before. “Come on now, big smile, project your voice like we practiced — no, no, no, what are you doing?” Graham said through his teeth as […] Trump’s legal team continued to botch the written defense he had coached them through late last night and into the early morning. […] Sources reported that as defense arguments concluded, a visibly tense Graham jumped up from his chair, applauded wildly, and stared daggers into his Republican colleagues until they, too, stood and joined his ovation.

    The idea that Graham, arguably one of the stooopidist Senators, coaching some bottom-tier lawyers, seems very apropos.

  260. blf says

    Not political per se, albeit as pointed out some of the films very much have a political / historical tint, The show must go on: French animation industry thrives despite Covid-19 (video).

    One tidbit I didn’t know was apparently the first animated film was French, and, depending on definitions, even predates the Lumière brothers, who (again depending on definitions) are often credited with the first commercial film. The history of early cinema is sufficiently convoluted all of those claims, both explicit and implicit, can be challenged.

  261. KG says

    QAnon and Iranian Theocrat agree: Covid-19 vaccine turns you gay!!! I guess I should warn my wife in advance of my first shot on 21st.

  262. says

    Today’s hearing has begun. Rep. Raskin is saying they want to depose Rep. Herrera Beutler. Less than an hour, can be done by Zoom. They also want to subpoena her notes of the conversation with McCarthy. Now van der Veen is saying if the House managers do that, he wants more than 100 witnesses, I think including the insurrectionists. He’s ranting and growling.

  263. says

    Now van der Veen is claiming Trump’s actions during the insurrection are irrelevant to the incitement charge, because that only refers to a single point in time when someone explicitly says to commit violence. If the managers depose anyone, he needs to depose Pelosi and VP Harris. And not by Zoom, but in his office in Philadelphia. The Senators are laughing at him. Leahy had to call for order in the chamber. VdV just said “I haven’t laughed at any of you. There’s nothing laughable here.” He’s ranting again. It’s hard to watch, to be honest.

  264. blf says

    SC@396, “van der Veen is saying if the House managers do that [depose Rep Herrera Beutler], he wants more than 100 witnesses”.

    Other than extending the trial (with knock-on consequences for Biden and teh dummies legislation and appointments), and presumably only delaying the (probable) failure-to-convict, I can think of only one reason to not call his bluff (i.e., depose Beutler and let van der Veen call his 100 witnesses): Denying the (probable) clowns and insurrectionists a platform. Which presumes hair furor’s bottom-tier lawyers really do have witnesses lined up — and based on the performance so-far, that seems unlikely (and 100 very Very unlikely). Perhaps especially as, if I recall correctly, witnesses testify under oath.

  265. blf says

    SC@401, So they did call the clown’s bluff. Any hints (besides @399) who these 100 witnesses for hair furor (supposedly) will be? Or more likely, what excuses the bottom-tier lawyers will offer for calling very few — possibly no — witnesses, as I (currently) suspect is the case?

    And why I am not surprised that Graham changed his vote? (Rhetorical question!) As the Grauniad put it in their current impeachment ][ live blog: “Lindsay Graham changed his vote from no to yes after it was clear the motion would pass.”

  266. says

    One positive result of calling witnesses is that the longer this goes on, the greater the chance of Trump speaking out. They’ve been able to keep him quiet this long because he expected the end of this to come today, but now that Herrera Buetler is going very public and calling on others to do the same and this won’t be over today, I don’t see how he’ll be able to restrain himself from self-destructive statements and actions.

  267. says

    blf @ #405, I think the names that he’s mentioned are: Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser, and the insurrectionists generally. None of those would help their case.

  268. blf says

    I’m currently listening to an interesting PBS interview (Amanpour and Company), Ronan Farrow: Who Were the Rioters on Jan 6th? One point being made right now is every one of the insurrectionists Mr Farrow interviewed in depth — from a previously-benign person, to the classic nutter, to a moderately-successful business-person — got their news from farcebork. Not the reliable MSM, or even faux, etc., per se, but farcebork (with some of the farcebork posts read, my guess, circulating excerpts of faux, etc., videos). They are all also racist, and “got very angry about BLM”.

  269. blf says

    I’m still watching this so might change my mind, but as another long-term expat, I agree (completely?) with what is being said, How I See the US After Living Abroad for 15 Years (video). I’ve lived outside the States for longer, and in fewer countries and within a smaller geographical area, and have not returned to the States, but what this vlogger (who I’ve never knowingly encountered before), Kristin Wilson, is saying seems very Very spot-on.

  270. blf says

    A snippet from the Grauniad’s current impeachment ][ live blog:

    The confusion[/ surprise about calling witnesses] appears to have extended to the chamber floor: Alaska’s Republican senator Dan Sullivan at one point asked what exactly the vote was on.

    Also, Blunt, a juror, calls Trump’s lawyers our side on third day of impeachment trial (11-Feb):

    Missouri Republican Sen Roy Blunt, a juror in former President [sic] Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, called Trump’s defense team our side when talking to reporters Thursday.

    I’m not sure when our side starts, but Saturday’s looking better all the time, Blunt told reporters Thursday in response to a question about when the trial was likely to conclude.

    At the beginning of the impeachment trial, senators swore an oath “to do impartial justice.” But Blunt’s phrasing reflects the political nature of the trial.

    […]

    Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas, an attorney, said the legal argument that Trump cannot be tried under the constitution has been thoroughly debunked and he called on the region’s senators to be more forthcoming about the reasons they’ll likely vote to acquit Trump this weekend.

    […]

  271. blf says

    Hair furor’s bottom-tier lawyers surprised again, again… from the Grauniad’s current impeachment ][ live blog:

    […] Cecilia Vega of ABC News reports that sources close to Trump are “floored” by this morning’s vote.

    Sources close to president [sic] Trump are floored by what just happened. Stunned / Stupefied / Total panic over who steps up to help the team because the lawyers left were only sticking together because they thought it was over today. Now — complete panic […]

    The bit about “the lawyers left were only sticking together because they thought it was over today” perhaps also explains a (minor) mystery: My understanding was the Senate was, out of respect for one of the bottom-tier individual’s religious beliefs, not going to convene for the trial on Saturday (today), yet they obviously are. My guess then is those bottom-tier lawyers told the Senate convening on Saturday would be Ok, as their fellow bottom-feeding ambulance chaser didn’t need to be present for the (presumed) formalities.

    And from a more recent live blog entry:

    […] We’re currently at 301 [witnesses] and counting, [hair furor advisor Jason] Miller tweeted shortly after the Senate went into recess.

    The names on the list include: House speaker Nancy Pelosi, vice-president Kamala Harris, Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer, New York Times photographer Erin Schaff, DC mayor Muriel Bowser, former Senate sergeant-at-arms Michael C Stenger, Washington DC police chief Robert Contee, former House sergeant-at-arms Paul Irving, former deputy secretary of state John Sullivan, senators Cory Booker and Elizabeth Warren and representatives Maxine Waters, Ayanna Pressley, Joaquin Castro and Ted Lieu.

    The blog also reports “When [the Senate] resume[s], there will be another vote on a simple majority basis to subpoena specific witnesses.” So, 301 and counting votes, possibly? (Rather doubt it, but teh thugs will try anything.)

  272. blf says

    Trump defense team ridiculed over video of Democrats saying ‘fight’ (Grauniad edits in {curly braces}):

    […]
    Lawyers for Donald Trump were condemned by Democrats and ridiculed by critics on Friday, after they showed the Senate impeachment trial a video which sought to compare remarks on the campaign trail and in support of protests against systemic racism with Trump’s incitement of the attack on the US Capitol on 6 January.

    In the video, prominent figures including Vice-President Kamala Harris and the Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren were shown using the word “fight”, the word taken out of context and spliced with scenes of violence and destruction during nationwide protests sparked by the killing by Minneapolis police officers of George Floyd […].

    [… T]he Trump team’s video met with widespread ridicule and disgust.

    Daniel Goldman, lead counsel for House Democrats in Trump’s first impeachment last year, wrote: “Just after {Trump attorney David} Schoen accused managers of manipulating evidence because they took excerpts of videos, he shows a lengthy video of numerous, extremely spliced video clips without any context for the comments.”

    Philip Bump, a Washington Post reporter, pointed out that Schoen “was on Fox News this week where he said that only Trump had a base that would actually be riled up by language about fighting!”

    They’re using rhetoric that’s just as inflammatory, or more so, Schoen told Sean Hannity on Tuesday, when asked why Democrats’ calls to “fight” did not result in violence like that seen at the Capitol. The problem is, they don’t really have followers, you know, their dedicated followers … when they give their speeches.

    […] Vote Vets, a progressive group, wrote: “Trump’s defence’s argument is that when the Beastie Boys sang you need to ‘fight’ for your right to party, either it meant ‘kill your parents’, or Trump is innocent.”

    […]

  273. says

    blf @ #416, their whole bluff is pathetic. They obviously didn’t want any witnesses, were furious at the possibility, and don’t have the votes for any of these irrelevant witnesses. And no witnesses would help them (which is why they didn’t want them).

    The bit about “the lawyers left were only sticking together because they thought it was over today” perhaps also explains a (minor) mystery: My understanding was the Senate was, out of respect for one of the bottom-tier individual’s religious beliefs, not going to convene for the trial on Saturday (today), yet they obviously are.

    I believe that after Schoen’s request was granted he suddenly withdrew it and they decided to go ahead with the other lawyers. Oddly, there was also reporting that he’d quit the team on Friday – something about a disagreement about the video they were using – and then Trump tried to get him to return. I don’t know what happened with this, but it might have been decided that since it was going to end today before he could return anyway it didn’t matter. Now this has all thrown a wrench in those plans.

  274. says

    People on MSNBC are talking about the possibility of just entering a statement from Herrera Beutler into the record, which I wouldn’t be happy with. They could just have done that anyway.

  275. blf says

    Apparently teh thugs in the Senate are now threatening to not let any other business proceed until the trial is over. Since deposing numerous witnesses could take weeks, that would — as speculated in @400 — delay Biden and teh dummies legislation and appointments. From the Grauniad’s current impeachment ][ live blog:

    Reports indicate that senators are discussing the possibility of entering the CNN report about House minority leader Kevin McCarthy’s January 6 call with Donald Trump into the official record.

    If the report is added to the official record, then the Senate may decide not to approve any witnesses in the trial, which means the acquittal vote could happen soon.

    One reason why Democrats may not want any witnesses to be called is because it could give Republicans the opportunity to grind the whole Senate to a halt, holding up Joe Biden’s coronavirus relief package and his remaining cabinet nominations.

    Republican Senator Joni Ernst told the New York Times moments ago, If they want to drag this out, we’ll drag it out. They won’t get their noms, they won’t get anything. […]

    It’s teh thugs, thug, who are trying to drag this out, with, supposedly, hundreds of witnesses. To-date, as far as I know, the dummies have proposed only one witness, to testify remotely, a very-probably rapid process.

  276. says

    From @YahooNews live blog: Ex-Pence COS Marc Short, who was with VP 1/6, could be biggest wild card witness. Short has ‘real hatred and disrespect’ for Trump, says source who has talked to him. Jan. 6 ‘pushed him over the edge & was his breaking point’.”

    I mean, come on! Do the two-week delay and witnesses!

  277. blf says

    SC@419, The only source I am aware for that odd claim about David Schoen maybe quitting and then maybe returning is teh “U”K’s Daily Fail, which is not a source I trust without independent verifiable confirmation (rather like hair furor!) — of which there is none I know of for those claims.

    And yes, the point I was trying to make is the one you made better, and more clearly (Thanks!): If teh bottom-feeders “thought” the remaining proceedings were mostly a formality and would be over within a day, then they might also have “thought” they didn’t need Mr Schoen present; ergo, the Senate could convene today.

  278. says

    From the CNN liveblog:

    In the backdrop of the unfolding confusion over whether witnesses will be called is the already tenuous status of former President Trump’s defense team. They had been essentially hanging by a thread for the last several days, according to multiple people, who described internal deliberations as chaotic, disorganized and strained.

    The attorneys and advisers have been arguing constantly over disagreements about how to move forward for days.

    They were irritated by Trump’s criticism and unprepared for how to deal with his outbursts. He has mainly been angry about their performance, though he liked Michael van der Veen and praised him last night. The attorneys have argued with each other and were annoyed by GOP senators telling them what to do do on the floor.

    And now that there’s the threat of witnesses, they are trying to figure out how much longer they will be doing this job they believed was coming to an end.

    So now would be a perfect time for the Dems, who have the power, to fold and let it end today. JFC.

  279. blf says

    SC@425 quotes someone (who claims to be a lawyer), “I don’t understand how Democrats can look at the panicked reaction of their opponents to the witnesses vote and decide that capitulation is the best course.”

    There is a reason I (usually) refer to the Democrats as dummies… this would seem to be another example, albeit as noted above, they might be taking teh thugs’s threats to shutdown the Senate seriously (albeit wouldn’t they be able to win any vote to not shutdown, presumably with the Vice President tie-breaking?).

  280. says

    blf @ #431, they could have done a two-week delay. They were only calling one witness, who was willing to be deposed, for a deposition of less than an hour. I think they’re going on break for all of next week. This sucks.

  281. blf says

    SC@433, Yes, the Senate is currently not scheduled to meet all of next week (15–21 February, inclusive). So that (hypothetical) “two weeks” could easily become three… which teh thugs drag out… four, five, … I don’t currently have a problem — despite being annoying and probably unproductive & unnecessary — with that per se, provided it doesn’t completely shutdown the Senate.

  282. blf says

    Clarification to me@437, “I don’t currently have a problem […] with that”, meaning, similar to the quote in @436, “they should absolutely pause the trial and depose witnesses. As many as they need!” Again, however, provided the “pause”, etc., doesn’t completely shutdown the Senate.

  283. says

    I wasn’t even able to pay attention to the beginning of the closing arguments, but Cicilline is doing a nice job bringing in the Herrera Beutler evidence. Now he’s reading the report about Pence’s team not agreeing that Trump was concerned about Pence’s safety. (Which then vdV started screaming about – “This hasn’t been entered into the evidence!”)

  284. blf says

    As the Grauniad puts it in their current impeachmentbad joke ][ live blog:

    [… T]he decision [to not actually call any witnesses …] means that the Democrats passed on an opportunity to present new, potentially damning evidence about Donald Trump’s response to the January 6 insurrection.

    The former president [sic] would almost certainly have been acquitted whether or not witnesses are called, but the new evidence could have impacted the opinions of millions of Americans who witnessed the violence of that day.

  285. blf says

    A short Grauniad article on Jaime Herrera Beutler, The GOP representative at center of Trump impeachment trial drama:

    […]
    Herrera Beutler, who has served as a representative since 2011, made her support to impeach Trump known six days after the Capitol riot in early January. “The president of the United States incited a riot aiming to halt the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next,” Herrera Beutler said then.

    In the statement, Herrera Beutler described Republican leader Kevin McCarthy as “pleading with the President to go on television and call for an end to the mayhem, to no avail”.

    Late Friday, Herrera Beutler went further, stating she was told by McCarthy that Trump initially sided with supporters. […]

    […]

    Herrera Beutler first came to national attention in 2014, when then-speaker John Boehner introduced [Herrera Beutler’s] 13 month old daughter Abigail, who suffers from Potter’s Syndrome, a rare, generally-fatal condition, in which a child is born without kidneys, to the legislative chamber with the Johns Hopkins doctor, Jessica Bienstock, who’d helped save her life.

    Herrera Beutler later co-sponsored a bipartisan bill that would allow children on the Medicaid program with complex medical conditions to seek specialty care outside their coverage areas.

    Herrera Beutler also drew attention as one of a growing number of women balancing motherhood and elected political life. At the time of her daughter’s birth, she was just the ninth lawmaker in history to have a baby while serving in Congress.

    Now again she is a rare political creature: an eloquent voice in her Trumpist-dominated party, arguing for a return of the party to its pre-Trump values and standards of political life.

    In her 12 January statement on the Capitol riot, the congresswoman wrote: “I understand the argument that the best course is not to further inflame the country or alienate Republican voters. But I am also a Republican voter. I believe in our Constitution, individual liberty, free markets, charity, life, justice, peace and this exceptional country. I see that my own party will be best served when those among us choose truth.”

  286. says

    Chris Murphy:

    I remember the moment I saw Trump’s tweet attacking Pence. We were in the chamber as aides were scrambling to bar the doors. Some were sobbing in fear. The mob was outside. Someone yelled out shots had been fired.

    I turned to Tim Kaine and said, “Oh my god, he’s egging them on.”

  287. blf says

    The Grauniad’s starts snarking, For Trump, V is for victory — while his lawyers flick a V-sign our way (for confused USians, the V sign with the palm inward is a rude gesture (in some countries), and with the palm outwards it is the famous “V for victory” sign (in some countries), but a rude gesture in others; and both forms are also symbols in various deaf sign languages):

    […]
    You may have thought the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump was somehow connected to the fascist mob that staged an insurrection on Capitol Hill last month.

    According to Trump’s lawyers, you are clearly an idiot.

    In actual fact, the former president [sic] was impeached for using the word “fight” — a crime committed by everyone in Congress and a good number of other people you might know.

    Madonna, for instance. Johnny Depp too. Seriously, America. If it’s OK for Madonna to talk about fighting, or voguing, or being a material girl, what’s the big deal?

    If the star of Pirates of the Caribbean can talk about walking the gangplank or shivering his timbers, then who is to deny our beloved former president [sic] the right to also don an eyepatch and wave a cutlass in our general direction?

    There was lots of video on the day of the greatest Trump lawyering of all. Mostly the same video, played over and over again, sometimes two or three times in quick succession like a Max Headroom compilation of politicians saying the word “fight”.

    There was President Biden, and Vice-President Harris. There were a bunch of former Democratic presidential candidates. Also some House impeachment managers.

    The only challenge for Trump’s lawyers is that none of them led an insurrection. None of them urged a mob to storm Congress. None of them timed their fight song for the precise moment when elected officials were carrying out their constitutional duty to certify an election’s results.

    [… The best lawyering in the land’s strike force] featured a new striker. Not the bumbling, rambling Bruce Castor, or the endlessly pedantic David Schoen. No, this time Trump bestowed upon his historic impeachment trial a personal injury lawyer […]. An ambulance chaser, best known […] for his radio ads, asking if you’ve tripped while walking down the street.

    If the walkway isn’t clear, and you fall and get hurt due to snow and ice, call 215-546-1000 for Van der Veen, O’Neill, Hartshorn and Levin, the ads say, according to the Washington Post. […]

    [… M]ostly he claimed that he — and his client — were defending the constitution at the precise moment when they were burning it to crispy charcoal husk.

    OK, so the Trump mob unleashed violence to stop the constitutional counting of the electoral college votes. But the idea that Congress might stop Trump’s free-speech rights to whip up that mob is an outrageous, unconstitutional human rights abuse that threatens to silence all politicians everywhere.

    OK, so the Trump mob might have silenced Mike Pence permanently by hanging him on the gallows they built on the steps of Congress. But if Congress tries to stop a president [sic] from using a mob to intimidate Congress, where will it end?

    Pretty soon, Mr V argued, we won’t even have access to lawyers. The hallowed right to counsel, if not ambulance chasers, might be threatened. […]

    […]

    This is not whataboutism, he declared, after rolling his whataboutist video for the second or third or fourth time. I’m showing you this to show that all political speech must be protected.

    The key to the defense was about incitement to violence and the legal test of Brandenburg v Ohio. Appropriately enough, the Brandenburg in question was a leader of the Ku Klux Klan and the test […] was about whether the free speech in question “explicitly or implicitly encouraged the use of violence or lawless action”.

    Mr Trump did the opposite of advocating for lawless action, said Mr V. The opposite!

    This is only true if it’s opposite day, when opposite means the opposite of opposite. […]

    […]

    The worst news of all was that [the now legendary Bruce] Castor was at the microphone, pretending to be a half-decent lawyer.

    Did the 45th president [sic] engage in incitement — they say insurrection, began Castor. Clearly there was no insurrection, he continued, defining the word as taking the TV stations over and having some idea of what you’re going to do when you take power.

    [… the snark continues…]

    Spare us the hypocrisy and false indignation, said Mr V, as he wrapped up another hypocritical and falsely indignant response to the same old video of Democrats saying fiery things.

    Now all we have left is the hypocrisy and false indignation of Republican senators who value their own careers above their own lives or the democracy that elected them. The V is for venal.

  288. blf says

    From the Grauniad’s current impeachmentbad joke ][ live blog:

    Michael Van der Veen […] falsely claimed that the Capitol insurrection was carried out by groups on the left and right.

    That is not true. The riot was carried out by a group of Trump’s supporters […]

    Some Democrats in the Senate chamber reacted to Van der Veen’s assertion by audibly groaning or shaking their heads, according to those present in the chamber. […]

    Hair furor, very fine people on both sides

  289. blf says

    More Van der Veen bellowing:

    Trump lawyer Michael Van der Veen equated the Capitol insurrection with Black Lives Matter protests last summer.

    Van der Veen also accused Joe Biden of not condemning violence that arose at some BLM protests.

    That is entirely false. Biden repeatedly condemned violence at the protests and called on demonstrators to remain peaceful as they marched against the police killing of George Floyd.

    This nutter isn’t a bottom-tier ambulance chaser but a lowest-percentile legalslies’R’us huckster. Alls teh besteringest peoples !

    He’s also now apparently repeated the lies the trial is unconstitutional because hair furor no longer occupies Wacko House (overlooking the Senate at the start of the trial voted that it was constitutional plus multiple historical examples), and the trial should have been held sooner (overlooking the Senate thugs didn’t allow that).

    I suppose these sort of antics might convince a jury-less lay judge in small claims court (or similar), which might be the huckster’s normal arena for deploying their stooopidity. Sadly, he’ll probably be able to claim I got hair furor acquitted, which is wrong on multiple points: There are other alleged lawyers in hair furor’s lies brigade; and (probably) hair furor was not acquitted or found “not gulity”, but instead not convicted… by a biased “jury”, some of whom were involved in the crimes, wrote the trial rules, and some of whom seem to have helped the alleged lawyers.

  290. says

    Follow-up to blf @448, 449 and 450.

    NBC News:

    Echoing language that was once frequently used by his client, Trump defense lawyer Michael Van der Veen blasted the Democrats’ impeachment case against Trump as an “unjust and blatantly unconstitutional act of political vengeance” and a divisive “politically motivated witch hunt.” The trial, Van der Veen said, amounted to “constitutional cancel culture.”

    Commentary:

    […] every credible argument in defense of Trump had already been thoroughly discredited by House impeachment managers over the course of their two-day presentation. Helping bolster the point, the former president’s defense team found it necessary to concoct an alternate reality, unrecognizable to those who live in this reality.

    Team Trump asked senators to believe that it was antifa members who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6. And that the former president received 75 million votes. And that Trump’s remarks about Charlottesville weren’t as offensive as the American mainstream thought they were.

    […] In this alternate reality, references to “bringing the cavalry” on Jan. 6 were actually references to the location of Jesus’s crucifixion. In this same version of reality, it was Democrats who presented selectively edited footage — according to defense attorneys who, at the time, were presenting footage selectively edited to suggest Democrats endorsed acts of political violence.

    […] But on and on the defense team went. Did you know that there wasn’t actually an “insurrection” on Jan. 6? Because that’s the reality Trump’s lawyers want senators to believe. It’s the same reality in which Trump had a First Amendment right to incite a riot, the Russia scandal wasn’t real, and the former president said nothing wrong when demanding election officials in Georgia “find” votes that would flip the state in his favor.

    This was not a presentation for serious people engaged in a serious process. It was a political spectacle intended to provide cover for partisans and satisfy the whims of an unhinged client.

    […] most Senate Republicans made up their minds about the trial’s outcome long before the proceedings began.

    But winning the political fight and winning on the merits are often two entirely different things.

    Link

  291. says

    From Wonkette:

    […] Congratulations to Richard Burr, Bill Cassidy, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney, Ben Sasse, and Pat Toomey for having eyeballs in their faces and enough spine not to lie down and say PLEASE SIRE MAY I HAVE ANOTHER when somebody tries to assassinate them. I mean it, we are pretty mean to Susan Collins in particular, for sucking all the time, but she did well this time. She may escape history’s gimlet eye, FOR NOW.

    […] I think I’ll have a drink, yeah nah? Yeah. Here’s to us.

    Link

  292. says

    Wonkette: “Trump’s Postmaster General Still Trying To Take Down The Post Office From Within.”

    […] His latest plan? Making the mail slower and more expensive. Right now, if you mail something first class in a regular sized envelope — a letter, a bill, whatever — it will arrive in two days. DeJoy wants to take away that tier of first class mail and make it so that mail will be delivered in three to five days. He also wants to make it so first class mail can no longer be transported by airplane, but must instead be transported only by trucks. [WTF?]

    The post office has already been slow since DeJoy took over, with only 38 percent of all first class mail making it on time by the end of 2020. Up until DeJoy’s appointment in June, over 90 percent of first class mail was delivered on time. This means that it was not a COVID-related decline, but rather a direct result of DeJoy’s actions.

    According to sources who spoke to the Washington Post, DeJoy also wants to raise the cost of postage, citing the fact that the post office lost money in 2020 as a result of COVID. Of course, it probably also lost some money due to people feeling like they couldn’t trust that their mail would be delivered on time. […]

    Via Washington Post:

    DeJoy in an emailed statement declined to discuss his plan, saying it was not finalized. He said Postal Service leaders had discussed the proposal for eight months and that any new operations would retain six- and sometimes seven-day delivery. The board of governors, he said, backs the proposed policies.

    And then he had the gall to act as if solving the post office’s current problems with reliability was something he really needed outside input to figure out:

    DeJoy said he’s solicited comments from members of Congress, industry leaders, union officials and management leaders for feedback on “successfully fixing problems that are preventing the Postal Service from meeting the American people’s expectations for reliability.”

    I don’t know, maybe not getting rid of sorting machines and mail boxes might help? I don’t know, just spitballing here. Because it sure seems like “the problem preventing the Postal Service from meeting the American’s people’s expectations for reliability” is Louis DeJoy himself. Thus the decline in reliability that directly followed his appointment. [chart available at the link]

    Slowing down the mail isn’t just an inconvenience — there are far-reaching effects of this nonsense.

    Mail industry experts say the postal economy runs on a system of elasticity, where the Postal Service relies on large injections of first-class mail volume from large clients to support its hulking national infrastructure and keep prices low for residential customers […]

    The delivery slowdowns coupled with price increases, mailing industry officials say, could threaten that system by driving commercial mailers to cut costs and pull more volume out of the mail stream. In the long run, that could force the Postal Service to increase postage rates on the customers left in the system — including small businesses, seniors and people with disabilities — or to further cut service.

    Good plan, right? No!

    Now, you may be wondering — if Louis DeJoy is doing an extremely bad job and in fact hurting the USPS, why can’t Joe Biden just get rid of him? Alas, it’s not that easy, because elected officials are not allowed to directly interfere with the mail. What Biden can do, and needs to do is appoint four Democrats to the open seats on the governing board of the post office, and then they can vote DeJoy out before these things do get finalized. He said in a statement last Monday that he was on it and was looking to fill the board with members who “reflect his commitment to the workers of the U.S. Postal Service — who deliver on the post office’s vital universal service obligation,” so fingers crossed that happens before the post office goes down in flames.

    Link

  293. says

    Despite a bipartisan vote to convict, Trump is acquitted after Senate fails to reach 2/3 margin

    […] 57 to 43 in favor of convicting Donald J. Trump in his second impeachment trial. Though this was, by far, the greatest bipartisan vote in favor of impeachment in the nation’s history, it still was not sufficient to reach the necessary two-thirds of the Senate necessary for conviction.

    Among those Republicans voting with Democrats were Richard Burr, Bill Cassidy, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney, Ben Sasse, and Pat Toomey.

    With that vote, the court of impeachment is adjourned and Republicans have shrugged off their last flirtation with the idea of democracy. […]

    Sen. Chuck Schumer: “This trial wasn’t about choosing country over party, not even that. This trial was about choosing country over Donald Trump, and 43 Republican members chose Trump.” […]

    Trump has released a gloating statement. I’m not going to quote any of it. Just know that he doesn’t take a moment to condemn the violence on Jan. 6.

  294. says

    Washington Post:

    […] One key vote the House impeachment managers didn’t get was another senator who had expressed openness to conviction: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). McConnell suggested in a speech after the vote that he indeed blamed Trump, saying “President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day,” but said Trump’s status as a former president rendered the issues at hand moot.

    Given the historically bipartisan votes, though, you have to wonder whether if McConnell decided to press the issue he could have gotten enough votes for a conviction.

    […] The overriding reason for Trump’s acquittal was the alleged unconstitutionality of the proceedings.

    Republicans have who have raised concerns about Trump’s actions or have declined to vouch for him have repeatedly signaled this would be why they vote against conviction. McConnell after the vote issued a damning indictment of Trump suggesting he had indeed incited the attack, which others including Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) echoed even while voting against conviction “solely” on constitutional grounds.

    Those statements reinforce just how bad even Trump’s allies decided his conduct was, and they shouldn’t be glossed over.

    But it’s also the definition of a technicality — and it arguably doesn’t hold up.

    As even many conservative legal scholars argued this week, the Senate had a duty to evaluate the evidence against Trump. There were legitimate questions about whether the Senate could hold an impeachment trial for a former official or a former president — though most legal analysts agreed it could — but it’s never been tried in court.

    But the courts almost always defer to Congress on such things, because of the separation of powers. Thus, when the Senate itself voted that it had the jurisdiction to try Trump, that arguably settled the issue. The Senate voted 56-44 that it had jurisdiction.

    Lawmakers are allowed to vote to acquit Trump for whatever reason they choose. The rules in such a trial are not the same as a criminal trial, in which jurors at this stage would be required to disregard previous rulings and decide the case on the merits. […]

    Link

  295. says

    Trump’s idiotic, gloating statement:

    I want to first thank my team of dedicated lawyers and others for their tireless work upholding justice and defending truth.

    My deepest thanks as well to all of the United States Senators and Members of Congress who stood proudly for the Constitution we all revere and for the sacred legal principles at the heart of our country.

    Our cherished Constitutional Republic was founded on the impartial rule of law, the indispensable safeguard for our liberties, our rights and our freedoms.

    It is a sad commentary on our times that one political party in America is given a free pass to denigrate the rule of law, defame law enforcement, cheer mobs, excuse rioters, and transform justice into a tool of political vengeance, and persecute, blacklist, cancel and suppress all people and viewpoints with whom or which they disagree. I always have, and always will, be a champion for the unwavering rule of law, the heroes of law enforcement, and the right of Americans to peacefully and honorably debate the issues of the day without malice and without hate.

    This has been yet another phase of the greatest witch hunt in the history of our Country. No president has ever gone through anything like it, and it continues because our opponents cannot forget the almost 75 million people, the highest number ever for a sitting president, who voted for us just a few short months ago.

    I also want to convey my gratitude to the millions of decent, hardworking, law-abiding, God-and-Country loving citizens who have bravely supported these important principles in these very difficult and challenging times.

    Our historic, patriotic and beautiful movement to Make America Great Again has only just begun. In the months ahead I have much to share with you, and I look forward to continuing our incredible journey together to achieve American greatness for all of our people. There has never been anything like it!

    We have so much work ahead of us, and soon we will emerge with a vision for a bright, radiant, and limitless American future.

    Together there is nothing we cannot accomplish.

    We remain one People, one family, and one glorious nation under God, and it’s our responsibility to preserve this magnificent inheritance for our children and for generations of Americans to come.

    May God bless all of you, and may God forever bless the United States of America.

    Do not be taken in by any of this bullshit.

  296. says

    It’s easy to lose any perspective on U.S. history when you’re busy trying to live through it. But for those of us who will be around in 20 years or so (depending, of course, on what happens in the interim) it seems likely that there will be no shortage of withering commentary concerning this particular time. The country is being treated to the spectacle of a twice-impeached president charged with weighty crimes escaping justice due to the abject cowardice and contemptible self-dealing of one major political party.

    Two notable analyses have appeared in the last few weeks asking a patently obvious question: Would the founders of this country, the authors of its Constitution, towards whom all of our politicians profess such heartfelt fealty and respect, convict Donald Trump for his actions on Jan. 6? Would they bar him from ever holding public office again?

    The answer appears to be unequivocal: Not only would he be convicted and banned from office for the rest of his wretched existence as long he remained a U.S. citizen, but the verdict committing him to that fate would be unanimous.

    The Trump “defense,” such as it is, relies on parsing the semantics of what is or is not “incitement.” The defense contends that at worst, when Trump delivered his rousing call to action from behind his temporary, hardened Plexiglass-protected rostrum—pausing with significance between each phrase to ensure they had the desired impact upon the mob he himself had summoned before him—that he was merely “speaking his mind.” It was simply impossible, the lawyers insisted, to equate what Trump said with what his followers then did.

    That defense sounds specious because it is in fact specious. It ignores the context of the moment itself, the notorious months of preparing the mob for just this event. It ignores the urgency impressed upon that mob, its deliberately chosen participants, and the careful timing as Congress set to work only a few hundred yards from where he spoke. It ignores the gravity of the offense that actually occurred. But most of all, it ignores the fact that this was the president of the United States—someone at the absolute pinnacle of power in the country—delivering the message to his deluded faithful, all with the intention of overturning the election. […]

    Link

  297. blf says

    New York Trump investigation looks at $280m in loans:

    […]
    The Wall Street Journal reported that prosecutors in the city are investigating about $280m in loans to the Trump Organization, related to four buildings in Manhattan: Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue; a skyscraper at 40 Wall St; a hotel and residential building on Columbus Circle near Central Park; and an apartment building on the Upper East Side.

    The investigations appear to be an extension of a previously acknowledged move by Manhattan’s Democratic district attorney, Cyrus Vance Jr, over what prosecutors have called “possibly extensive and protracted criminal conduct at the Trump Organization”.

    […]

    The Journal reported that the loans were advanced by subsidiaries of Ladder Capital, a real-estate investment trust which employs Jack Weisselberg, son of Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg. Neither has been accused of wrongdoing. In 2018, the older Weisselberg was granted immunity to testify in the hush money investigation.

    […]

    The Journal reported that the Trump Tower loan [$100m in 2012] will come due in 2022 and others are due in the next several years. […]

    As far as I am aware, this expansion of the investigation is so-far unconfirmed.

  298. Pierce R. Butler says

    How fitting that Congress should time its abdication of Constitutional responsibility on the exact 5th anniversary of the death of Antonin Scalia.

  299. Ichthyic says

    “It is a sad commentary on our times that one political party in America is given a free pass to denigrate the rule of law, defame law enforcement, cheer mobs, excuse rioters, and transform justice into a tool of political vengeance”

    well, Trump is almost entirely accurate. it’s just he thinks he’s not talking about his own party.

  300. says

    Backlash Begins: State GOPers Turn On Burr And Cassidy After Voting To Convict Trump

    And off to the state GOP doghouse they go for daring to buck former President Trump.

    Shortly after voting to convict the former president for the second time on Saturday after the deadly Capitol insurrection last month, Sens. Richard Burr (R-NC) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA) have already found themselves in hot water with Republicans in their respective home states.

    Burr and Cassidy were one of seven Republicans who voted to convict Trump on the charge of “incitement of insurrection.” Burr and Cassidy’s votes in favor of impeaching the former president came as a surprise, with Burr having voted twice that the trial was unconstitutional. Cassidy also issued a surprise vote earlier in the week declaring that the trial is constitutional — a reversal of his vote last month in support of Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) motion to dismiss the trial, arguing that it’s unconstitutional to put a former president on trial.

    The Senate voted 57-43 to acquit Trump, however. Burr and Cassidy joined Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Susan Collins (R-ME), Mitt Romney (R-UT), Ben Sasse (R-NE) and Pat Toomey (R-PA) in voting to convict Trump following the deadly insurrection at the Capitol last month that left five dead.

    […] The North Carolina Republican party issued a statement slapping Burr on the wrist for voting in favor of Trump’s conviction. In a statement following his vote, Burr said Trump bears responsibility for the Capitol attack and that he found the House impeachment managers’ arguments “compelling.”

    […] The Louisiana Republican Party also swiftly moved to censure Cassidy on Saturday following his vote to convict Trump during the former president’s second impeachment trial.

    […] Shortly after voting to convict Trump, Cassidy explained his vote in a brief statement on Saturday, saying that “our Constitution and our country is more important than any one person” and he voted to convict Trump “because he is guilty.”

    Cassidy doubled down on defending his vote to convict Trump during an interview on ABC News the following morning. […] [Video is available at the link.]

    The official condemnations against Burr and Cassidy by state Republicans come on the heels of state-level Republicans rising to the occasion to fill the Trump-sized void by echoing the former president’s extreme rhetoric. A few days after President Biden’s inauguration last month, state Republicans in Arizona, Hawaii, Texas and Oregon made efforts to prove their loyalty to the former president by bolstering Trump’s falsehoods of widespread election fraud.

  301. says

    Ichthyic @462, true. Accurate observation. :-)

    Comments posted by readers of the TPM article referenced in comment 463:

    Too many rats, too small a cage, too little food.

    Please proceed.
    ———————-
    And that is why the rest of the hen house Republican Senators did not vote to convict. They were afraid of their local Republican organizations that would censure now and primary them later. This goes against the GOP’s Primary Directive to get reelected at any cost. Nobody said the defendant was innocent.
    —————–
    In a cultish authoritarian movement, dissent is verboten.
    ———————-
    There’ve been worse episodes in history, God knows. But this huge swathe of the population just wallowing in stupidity and hypocrisy is really quite a sight to see.
    ———————-
    for the last three years I’ve been reading over and over about how Trump was placing his cultists in the state parties to ensure their loyalty. And now we’re finding out WHY he was doing this. Anyone not toeing the party line will be canceled.

    Mitch doesn’t have a republican party any longer. He’s a small minority in the Trump party. And he’s about to discover that the hard way. I fully expect an internal insurrection in the GQP to topple Mitch for disloyalty. All they need are 25 votes in their caucus to replace him.

    Part of the censure of Burr read: “North Carolina Republicans sent Senator Burr to the United States Senate to uphold the Constitution…” Now that’s funny.

  302. says

    A sampling of reactions to the Senate impeachment vote:

    To quote a friend, “Today tells me that there are 43 Republicans and 57 Americans in the US Senate.” [Laura Gilman]
    ——————–
    Officer Goodman risked his life.

    The 43 wouldn’t risk criticism from Fox News. [Kurt Eichenwald]
    ———————-
    43 Senate Republicans have endorsed the idea that a president can do anything in his last month in office, without facing any consequences.

    It is hard to overstate what a dangerous precedent this is. [Robert Reich]
    ———————
    Today, the Senate minority was large enough to establish a precedent that presidents may send hordes of raving followers to attack the Capitol building and commit murder in an effort to overthrow the outcome of a valid national election. [Walter Shaub]
    ———————–
    Acquittal is not only approval of Trump’s effort to overturn the election and install himself in power, it is an invitation for him or someone else to do try it again. [Adam Serwer]
    ———————–
    It is truly sad and dangerous that only 7 Republicans voted to convict a president who is promoting a Big Lie, conspiracy theories and violence, and is aggressively trying to destroy American democracy. [Bernie Sanders]
    ——————
    This trial proved Trump’s high crimes against the Constitution. 43 senators put Trump first and failed the test of history. But history was also made with the largest bipartisan majority ever voting to convict a president. The rest of the story is ours to write. [Chris Van Hollen]
    ——————–
    House Managers did an amazing job proving Trump’s guilt. Republicans did an amazing job proving that they don’t care.
    ———————–
    Republicans: If you call witnesses we’ll obstruct congress, you’ll never get anything done.

    Democrats: Fine. No witnesses. You win.

    R:

    D:

    R: Just kidding. We’re going to obstruct congress anyway and you’ll never get anything done! Ha hah! Owned!

    D: Rats! [StoneKettle]
    ———————
    To: President Joseph Biden
    From: Every American who saw what the GOP did today

    Forget unity. Forget bipartisanship. Forget compromise. This is Trump’s mob. Eliminate the filibuster and get everything America needs done now. [Robert Reich]

  303. says

    President Biden’s statement:

    It was nearly two weeks ago that Jill and I paid our respects to Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who laid in honor in the Rotunda after losing his life protecting the Capitol from a riotous, violent mob on January 6, 2021.

    Today, 57 Senators – including a record 7 Republicans – voted to find former President Trump guilty for inciting that deadly insurrection on our very democracy. The Senate vote followed the bipartisan vote to impeach him by the House of Representatives. While the final vote did not lead to a conviction, the substance of the charge is not in dispute. Even those opposed to the conviction, like Senate Minority Leader McConnell, believe Donald Trump was guilty of a “disgraceful dereliction of duty” and “practically and morally responsible for provoking” the violence unleashed on the Capitol.

    Tonight, I am thinking about those who bravely stood guard that January day. I’m thinking about all those who lost their lives, all those whose lives were threatened, and all those who are still today living with terror they lived through that day. And I’m thinking of those who demonstrated the courage to protect the integrity of our democracy – Democrats and Republicans, election officials and judges, elected representatives and poll workers – before and after the election.

    This sad chapter in our history has reminded us that democracy is fragile. That it must always be defended. That we must be ever vigilant. That violence and extremism has no place in America. And that each of us has a duty and responsibility as Americans, and especially as leaders, to defend the truth and to defeat the lies.

    That is how we end this uncivil war and heal the very soul of our nation. That is the task ahead. And it’s a task we must undertake together. As the United States of America.

    Bolding is mine.

  304. says

    Commentary regarding Biden’s statement (comment 467):

    […] I was so glad that President Biden recognized how many people worked to protect our democracy: the Capitol police, the election workers, the officers and judges. We cannot take them for granted but need to support them.

    We also need, as President Biden said, to defend the truth and to defeat the lies, because we have discovered that without our help, truth does not win. I am sure there are many ways to do this, but let me mention a few simple actions that most of us can take, actions that we need to make into habits.

    Repeat the truth, over and over. We are hard-wired to believe what is repeated.

    Contact companies that have influence. Here’s a link. You’ll have more influence if you’re an employee, shareholder or customer, so start with those.

    Contact and support those who defend the truth. Perhaps a thank-you note at Twitter, which has just banned liar James O’Keefe. [Support legislators who defend truth.]

  305. blf says

    Boris Johnson, the alleged PM of teh “U”K, better known as teh NKofE (N.Korea of Europe), on the insurrection, Boris Johnson calls Trump impeachment over Capitol attack kerfuffle:

    […]
    In an interview with US television on Sunday, Boris Johnson characterised Donald Trump’s impeachment and acquittal on a charge of inciting insurrection against his own government as toings and froings and all the kerfuffle.

    The prime minister’s [sic†] words jarred with those of Joe Biden. In a statement on Saturday night, the new president said: “This sad chapter in our history has reminded us that democracy is fragile.”

    Five people died as a direct result of the attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters, who the president [sic] told to fight like hell in his attempt to overturn election defeat, on 6 January.

    […]

    Constitutional experts expressed concern for America’s 233-year-old system of government. Andrew Rudalevige of Bowdoin College told Axios: “Congress not even pushing back against a physical assault suggests that there’s a lot they will put up with.”

    […]

    While Trump was in office, Johnson cleaved so close to the president [sic] and his populist policies and style that Biden was reported to have called the prime minister [sic] “the physical and emotional clone of Donald Trump”.

    […]

      † Like hair furor, who claimed to be President yet essentially never performed or acted in manner broadly expected of the position, Johnson has rarely performed or acted for the position, PM, he claims to hold. Since in both cases their claims are betrayed by their actions, words, and inactions, referring to hair furor as “President” or Johnson as “PM” is extremely dubious, hence the frequent use of “[sic]” after their alleged titles. This is a new editorial markup decision on my part for Johnson.

  306. says

    Wonkette: “F*ck You, Mitch McConnell”

    Mere minutes after voting to acquit Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell took the Senate floor to make a strong case for … why we should convict Donald Trump.

    Except for some steaming mastodon dung at the end, it was a pretty good speech. […]

    […] For four years, Mitch and Trump worked hand-in-hand to do as much as they possibly could to destroy our country

    Some might say Mitch’s speech was an act of cowardice, but not me. I, for one, think it was incredibly brave for the man who is the actual reason the trial didn’t take place sooner to then stand up and say he couldn’t vote to convict solely because the trial didn’t take place sooner.

    “There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day,” said the man who had just voted to acquit, thus leaving open the possibility of Trump running again in 2024 and doing the exact same thing again.

    The speech began, “January 6 was a disgrace.” And it was.

    So was yesterday’s vote.

    Mitch McConnell full well knows that what happened on and before January 6 was an attack on our entire constitutional system. He knows Donald Trump sent an angry mob to the Capitol building to murder him and overthrow the government. And yet, he still couldn’t bring himself to vote for conviction.

    In so doing, Mitch basically just admitted that he believes there is a January exception for presidents committing high crimes and misdemeanors, as long as we’re talking about a Republican. […]

    At the end of the angry take-down of the former president, Mitch then tucked his tail between his legs, repeated the bullshit party line, and slunk off the floor.

    No serious person actually believes it is unconstitutional to hold an impeachment trial after a person has left office, especially if that person is impeached while they are still in office. Former presidents are entitled to a number of benefits, including a six-figure annual pension, lifetime Secret Service protection, and up to $1 million in travel expenses annually — and the only way to take that away is through the impeachment process.

    […] As for past impeachment trials that happened after people left office? Well, we don’t know. He just kind of ignored that.

    Nancy Pelosi, who had not planned on joining the House managers’ press conference after the vote, felt compelled to join the group after seeing Mitch’s speech. She blasted the former majority leader for his bullshit, saying, “It is so pathetic that Senator McConnell kept the Senate shut down so that the Senate could not receive the Article of Impeachment and has used that as his excuse for not voting to convict Donald Trump.”

    We agree.

    And look, there was plenty to agree with in Mitch’s speech. He also suggested that Trump could still face criminal charges and civil actions. “President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office as an ordinary citizen,” McConnell said. “He didn’t get away with anything. Yet.”

    […] Thanks for the speech, Mitch.

    Go to hell.

    https://www.wonkette.com/f-ck-you-mitch-mcconnell

  307. blf says

    Follow-up to SC@312, EU calls on China to reverse ban on BBC World News:

    The European Union on Saturday called on China to reverse its ban on the BBC World News television channel imposed in apparent retaliation for Britain’s pulling of the license of state-owned Chinese broadcaster CGTN.

    The EU said in a statement that Beijing’s move further restricted “freedom of expression and access to information inside its borders,” and violated both the Chinese constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    The statement also said that Hong Kong’s announcement that its public broadcaster would also stop carrying BBC broadcasts added to the “erosion of the rights and freedoms that is ongoing” in the semi-autonomous Chinese territory since the imposition last year of a sweeping new national security law.

    […]

    While Britain is no longer in the EU, it remains a member of the Council of Europe, which oversees a 1989 agreement linking broadcasting licenses. Britain, the US and foreign correspondents based in China have also expressed dismay over the BBC ban.

    China’s move Thursday was largely symbolic, because BBC World was shown only on cable TV systems in hotels and apartment compounds for foreigners and some other businesses. […]

    […]

    Losing its British license was a major blow for CGTN, which is part of a global effort by the party to promote its views and challenge Western media narratives about China, into which it has poured enormous resources. CGTN has a European operations hub in London.

  308. blf says

    Some snippets from Maureen Dowd in the Irish Times, Trump’s taste for violence bloodies Congress:

    It was Manson family-chilling to watch the House impeachment managers’ video with a rioter hunting for the House speaker, calling out: Where are you, Nancy? We’re looking for you, Na-a-ncy. Oh, Na-a-ncy. It was like watching his vicious Twitter feed come alive.

    Trump’s whole defence in the impeachment trial was like a low-budget movie trailer […]. It was just another Trump flimflam reality TV show, meant to prove how he was wronged, not how he wronged the country.

    [… O]pportunism has always run rampant in Congress. But most Republicans, who continue to tremble before Trump even though he devoured and destroyed their party, turning its traditional values upside down, are plumbing new cowardly depths. They are mini-Trumps, making decisions solely on self-interest.

    This is apparently republished from the NYT.

  309. says

    Technical issues yesterday prevented me from commenting about the impeachment vote, which, given how tense I was about it, was probably for the best! After listening to the House Managers, McConnell, Pelosi, Graham, etc., I’m OK with the decision not to seek witnesses. The House managers did a phenomenal job, and the 43 craven Republicans were exposed forever. I do wish they’d made more of an event of presenting the statement from Herrera Beutler, but it’s there in the record. It turns out I’m glad it’s over and Trump’s falling out of the news. A friend was saying yesterday that she’s afraid he’ll announce he’s running in 2024 and the media will give him a bunch of attention, but I doubt it. I think they loathe him, for good reason, and will be happy to pull up stakes in Florida and not have to deal with him. We’ll continue to get more information about the Capitol siege, but can attend to the crises at hand.

  310. says

    From David Remnick, writing for The New Yorker:

    On January 18th, two days before relinquishing power and flying off to his tropical exile, Donald Trump did what tyrants love to do: he attempted to rewrite the history of his nation.

    His instrument was the 1776 Commission, a motley assemblage of right-wing academics, activists, and pols who called for “patriotic education” in the schools and the construction of a National Garden of American Heroes that would “reflect the awesome splendor of our country’s timeless exceptionalism.” […]

    It is not difficult to imagine how the members of the 1776 Commission would evaluate Trump’s second impeachment trial. They, like the great majority of Republicans in the Senate, would vote for acquittal. […] Throughout the trial, the Democratic impeachment managers presented overwhelming evidence of Trump’s criminal culpability, his incitement of the January 6th assault on the U.S. Capitol. […]

    There is a long history of violence against democratic processes and voters in America: in the eighteen-fifties, nativist gangs like the Plug Uglies set out to intimidate immigrant voters; in the eighteen-seventies, white Southerners formed “rifle clubs” and attacked Black voters to hasten the end of Reconstruction. But this event was unique in U.S. history. This mob was inspired by a President.

    […] “I have to admit,” he said, “I’m exhausted.” For Raskin, the trial was the least of it. On the day before the assault on the Capitol, Raskin and his family had buried his son Tommy, a brilliant young man who was suffering from depression and took his own life on New Year’s Eve. And yet, despite the weight of that unspeakable tragedy, Raskin guided the prosecution of Trump in the Senate chamber with a grace, an unadorned eloquence, rarely, if ever, witnessed in our degraded civic life.

    Raskin paused and went on, telling me, “Look, Trump’s motivation was clear. He wanted to prolong and delay the certification of the Electoral College votes in hopes of putting so much pressure on the Vice-President and Congress that we would cave. And then the President would try to force the election into the House of Representatives, where each state delegation would have one vote and the Republicans have a majority of the states. All of his concentration was on thwarting the count so that the Vice-President would be forced to say there’s a need for a contingent election. That is what the President had in mind, and he came dangerously close to succeeding. And at that point he could also have decried the chaos and declared martial law.”

    […] It was sickening to watch men and women lugging Confederate symbols and shouting deranged slogans—“1776!”—pound on the doors of members of Congress, eager for violence. […]

    Joaquin Castro, a Texas congressman who spoke with clarity and passion as an impeachment manager, told me that during the long hours of the trial it seemed to him that Republican senators were attentive as they watched film and listened to descriptions of the insurrectionist violence. “There was a lot of evidence they hadn’t seen,” Castro said, recalling how close the raging mobs had come to descending on Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, and others and how viciously they attacked officers of the Capitol Police. The impeachment managers recited the number of the dead, the wounded, the suicides in the days after. “There were times when they were clearly moved by what they were seeing and hearing,” Castro said. “But then later I’d read reports at the end of the day that nothing had changed. The very idea that the evidence was horrific and the events tragic—it wasn’t getting through enough.”

    What’s become evident is that Republican members of Congress fear not only the indignity of losing a primary; some have come to fear the potential for violence among their constituents. […]

    On Friday night, the CNN reporter Jamie Gangel issued a startling report that the Republican House leader, Kevin McCarthy, had phoned Trump during the riot and pleaded with him to call off the mob. Trump told McCarthy that the rioters were Antifa. According to Gangel’s congressional sources, McCarthy told Trump that no, “These are your people.”

    “Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are,” Trump replied.

    “Who the fuck do you think you are talking to?” McCarthy reportedly responded.

    […] McCarthy’s courage proved as fleeting as a spring shower. A week after Joe Biden’s Inauguration, McCarthy flew to Palm Beach and showed his fealty to the disgraced former President. […]

    Mitch McConnell, the Senate Minority Leader, also proved to be in only temporary possession of a spine. After sending moralistic “signals” to reporters and colleagues that he was repelled by Trump’s behavior, he declared himself on Saturday morning ready to forgive and forget. “While a close call, I am persuaded that impeachments are a tool primarily of removal and we therefore lack jurisdiction,” he said in an e-mail to his Republican colleagues, saying that he would vote to acquit. McConnell’s note insured that there would be no last-minute turn against Trump. It was, of course, McConnell who had scheduled the trial to take place after Trump was out of office.

    […] Sensing opportunity in the Republican Party’s moral-positioning sweepstakes for 2024, Nikki Haley, who served the Trump Administration as United Nations Ambassador, told a reporter for Politico that she was “disgusted” by Trump’s behavior. At first, when Trump was merely spinning a conspiracy theory about the election and embedding it in the Party’s consciousness, Haley had been dismissive of a second impeachment. “At some point, I mean, give the man a break,” she had said. “I mean, move on.” But things have changed. “I don’t think he’s going to be in the picture,” Haley said, of Trump’s potential role in the next election cycle. “I don’t think he can. He’s fallen so far.”

    […] Trump’s story of his election “victory,” a theory conceived months before the ballot, was the source material of a nativist insurrection that could easily have ended not with five dead but with many dozens.

    “He truly made his base believe that the only way he could lose was if the election was rigged,” Joaquin Castro said during one of his trial speeches. “And, Senators, all of us know, and all of us understand how dangerous that is for our country. Because the most combustible thing you can do in a democracy is convince people an election doesn’t count, that their voice and their vote don’t count, and that it’s all been stolen—especially if what you’re saying are lies.”

    The trial ended in a sour acquittal. A shamed ex-President would inevitably declare victory.

    But it is no victory at all. Within hours of his Inauguration, Joe Biden cancelled the plans of the 1776 Commission. Propaganda would not become the law of the land. In his closing argument, Raskin quoted a Black Capitol Police officer who, after being called the N-word repeatedly, after his fellow-officers were beaten, abused, bashed with flag poles, and sprayed with bear repellent, asked, “Is this America?” History will judge Donald Trump severely for his crimes against the United States.

    New Yorker link

  311. says

    Sen. Murkowski’s statement on her vote to convict (emphasis added):

    On January 13, when the U.S. House of Representatives impeached former President Donald J. Trump for a second time, I committed to upholding my oath as a U.S. Senator—to listen to each side impartially, review all the facts, and then decide how I would vote. I have done that and after listening to the trial this past week, I have reached the conclusion that President Trump’s actions were an impeachable offense and his course of conduct amounts to incitement of insurrection as set out in the Article of Impeachment.

    The facts make clear that the violence and desecration of the Capitol that we saw on January 6 was not a spontaneous uprising. President Trump had set the stage months before the 2020 election by stating repeatedly that the election was rigged, casting doubt into the minds of the American people about the fairness of the election. After the election, when he lost by 7 million votes, he repeatedly claimed that the election was stolen and subjected to widespread fraud. At the same time, election challenges were filed in dozens of courts. Sixty-one different courts – including many judges nominated by President Trump himself – ruled against him.

    President Trump did everything in his power to stay in power. When the court challenges failed, he turned up the pressure on state officials and his own Department of Justice. And when these efforts failed, he turned to his supporters. He urged his supporters to come to Washington, D.C. on January 6 to ‘Stop the Steal’ of an election that had not been stolen. The speech he gave on that day was intended to stoke passions in a crowd that the President had been rallying for months. They were prepared to march on the Capitol and he gave them explicit instructions to do so.

    When President Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol, breached both chambers of Congress, and interrupted the certification of Electoral College votes, he took no action for hours. The evidence presented at the trial was clear: President Trump was watching events unfold live, just as the entire country was. Even after the violence had started, as protestors chanted ‘Hang Mike Pence’ inside the Capitol, President Trump, aware of what was happening, tweeted that the Vice President had failed the country. Vice President Pence was attempting to fulfill his oath and his constitutional duty with the certification of Electoral College votes.

    After the storm had calmed, the President endorsed the actions of the mob by tweeting, ‘These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!’ This message, in defense of only himself, came nearly four hours after the attack on the Capitol began. President Trump allowing the violence to go on for hours without any clear directive or demand for peace – his intentional silence – cost Americans their lives. President Trump was not concerned about the Vice President; he was not concerned about members of Congress; he was not concerned about the Capitol Police. He was concerned about his election and retaining power. While I supported subpoenaing witnesses to help elucidate for the American people President Trump’s state of mind during the riot, both his actions and lack thereof establish that.

    If months of lies, organizing a rally of supporters in an effort to thwart the work of Congress, encouraging a crowd to march on the Capitol, and then taking no meaningful action to stop the violence once it began is not worthy of impeachment, conviction, and disqualification from holding office in the United States, I cannot imagine what is. By inciting the insurrection and violent events that culminated on January 6, President Trump’s actions and words were not protected free speech. I honor our constitutional rights and consider the freedom of speech as one of the most paramount freedoms, but that right does not extend to the President of the United States inciting violence.

    Before someone assumes the office of the presidency, they are required to swear to faithfully execute the office of the President and to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. President Trump – the nation’s elected leader, the Commander in Chief of our armed forces – swore an oath to defend America and all that we hold sacred. He failed to uphold that oath.

    One positive outcome of the horrible events on January 6, was that hours after the Capitol was secured, on January 7, at 4:00 a.m., Congress fulfilled our responsibility to the U.S. Constitution and certified the Electoral College results. We were able to do that because of brave men and women who fulfilled their oath to protect and defend Congress. I regret that Donald Trump was not one of them.

  312. says

    Masha Gessen, writing for The New Yorker:

    Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial was an artifact of his Presidency. It was a battle of meaning against noise, […] and nihilism won.

    Over the course of three days, the House impeachment managers meticulously lined up facts, images, and arguments. What had been a fragmented understanding of the events of January 6th became an ordered narrative. President Trump had incited a violent insurrection. […]

    Then Bruce Castor, the co-leader of Trump’s defense team, opened for his side. He spoke for more than half an hour, mentioning the Federalist Papers; three of the Founding Fathers; the Bill of Rights; having worked in the Capitol building forty years ago; having visited the Capitol earlier in the week; the importance of the Senate; the fall of Rome; the inherent fragility of democracy; Benjamin Franklin; Philadelphia; independence from Great Britain; an unnamed member of Congress; the First Amendment; the absence of criminal conspiracy charges against Trump; the exceptional nature of impeachments; Bill Clinton; former Attorney General Eric Holder; Operation Fast and Furious; the late senator Everett Dirksen, of Illinois, Dirksen’s speeches, and the old technology of record players; the state of Nebraska, its judicial thought, and its senator Ben Sasse; all the other senators and how great they are; floodgates, whirlwinds, and the Bible; the Fourteenth Amendment; the concept of hearsay as illustrated by an apparently clairvoyant driver speaking to his wife in a hypothetical car; a supposed Senate rule that says, “Hey, you can’t do that” (not at all clear what); the ostensible “real reason” for the impeachment, that is, Trump’s political rivals’ fear of facing him in an election; some examples of one-term Presidents; the wisdom of voters; the fear that voters inspire in members of Congress; and the filibuster; then finally concluded, “President Trump no longer is in office. The object of the Constitution has been achieved. He was removed by the voters.” Journalists described the speech as meandering, rambling, and incoherent, and it was all that. It was also an insult to the proceedings and an assault on reason.

    Wow. The paragraph above reminds me of just how bad Castor’s opening defense speech was. (I tend to push things that are that bad out of my mind.)

    The defense also had their own videos, including an eleven-minute montage of Democratic politicians and others—many of them Black women—speaking out against Trump. […] These videos, like Castor’s bizarre opening speech, countered the clear, factual case presented by the House managers with noise. They flooded the zone.

    In “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” Hannah Arendt identifies a paradoxical pair of qualities that characterizes the audiences of totalitarian leaders: gullibility and cynicism.

    Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd […] The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.

    Another quality of totalitarian leaders and their followers alike is the belief that the end justifies the means; this makes it easier to accept the lie as a tactical move, even to support it—and to accept the next lie, and the one after that, and the one after that.

    Trump’s defense team assumed that its audience was both gullible and cynical. That their audience was willing to believe, contrary to prevalent legal opinion, that Trump, as a former President, shouldn’t be subject to impeachment proceedings; that he hadn’t intended to incite violence; that he didn’t realize that his supporters had invaded the Capitol; or simply that none of this meant anything—that he didn’t incite and yet he did, that he lost the election but won it, […] That Trump’s words were as devoid of meaning as those of his lawyers, and that impeaching the former President for “just words” was the beginning of a slippery slope to gratuitous impeachments and the repression of free speech.

    Arendt wrote that the qualities of gullibility and cynicism were present in different proportions depending on a person’s place in the totalitarian movement’s hierarchy. A senator may be more cynical, for example, and a rank-and-file conspiracy theorist more gullible. I suspect that the proportion of gullibility to cynicism can fluctuate over time, depending on one’s mood or circumstances—because everything is possible and nothing has meaning.

    Castor’s apparent meandering in his opening statement laid the groundwork for splicing together everything and nothing in the defense team’s videos. This, in turn, enabled Trump’s attorney Michael van der Veen to claim, on Saturday, that the insurrection was carried out by groups “on the left and right.” […] The Democrats gave up, agreeing to forgo witness testimony if Herrera’s written statement was entered into the record of the impeachment hearings. I wonder what Arendt would have made of their Hail Mary for the historical record. In 1967, she wrote in this magazine that, once elided, historical facts can almost never be restored. What if they are hidden in a file?

    Then it was over. Trump was acquitted. After voting to acquit Trump, the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, gave a speech in which he acknowledged that Trump had incited the insurrection:

    […] And yet, McConnell said, he believed that a former President could not be subjected to impeachment proceedings. This statement would seem to have wiped out most of Trump’s defense team’s efforts, but an audience of gullible cynics wouldn’t hear it this way. They’d say that they’d known all along that Trump was guilty but should get away with it. They can hold on to this knowledge until the next lie comes along.

    Emphasis is mine.

  313. says

    The result of the latest Trump impeachment trial was a fait accompli when Mike Pence was pulled from his mother’s womb, saw his shadow, and scurried back home like a frightened baby wallaby for six more weeks of gestation.

    The evidence now makes it abundantly clear that Donald Trump incited a riot, delighted in the mayhem, knew Mike Pence was in mortal danger, and not only did nothing to protect his unflinchingly loyal VP after hearing about his potential, you know, murder but actually sought to further incite the rioters by tweeting hateful lies directly at him.

    And what was Pence’s response to all this?

    Crickets.

    […] I wonder if there’s a literal “playbook of obsequiousness,” and if so, does Mother let him read it after bedtime?

    Oh, but Pence’s continued public deference to Trump doesn’t mean his feelings weren’t hurt by Trump’s decision to let him be hanged in public so Trump wouldn’t have to give up his extra White House ice cream scoop and unlimited free airplane rides. They were. You’d just never know it from talking to him.

    […] One ally described the former vice president as frustrated with what Trump did and said it would forever change his relationship with Trump. This person added, however, that Pence does not share the animus or fury that some of his former aides have for the president.

    […] Republicans keep coming back for more. […]

    And it’s not just Milquetoast Mike Pence.

    Trump gave out Lindsey Graham’s private cell phone number at a rally, and Graham eventually became his champion.

    Trump implied Ted Cruz’s wife was ugly and that his dad had a hand in JFK’s assassination, and Ted became his gracious and loyal servant.

    Kevin McCarthy was harassed and nearly killed by Trump’s mob, and Trump refused to lift a finger to protect him. Nevertheless, McCarthy still flew down to Florida three weeks later to kiss his ring.

    And despite knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt that Trump is the human equivalent of dumpster sushi, Mitch McConnell gladly wolfed down every rancid, mealy bite for years.

    It’s inconceivable, but it is what it is. If these guys got into a gruesome clown car accident and you had to Frankenstein them together to confect one historically awful legislator, you’d be hard-pressed to locate a spine […]

    Link

    There’s a poll at the end of the article. You can vote on the question: “Who is Donald Trump’s most gutless toady?”

  314. blf says

    Women form human chains in Russia in support of Navalny’s wife:

    […]
    Several hundred women formed human chains in Moscow and St Petersburg on Sunday, using Valentine’s Day to express support for the wife of the jailed opposition leader, Alexei Navalny, and other political prisoners.

    About 300 women gathered on Arbat Street in Moscow’s city centre holding a long white ribbon in temperatures of -13C (8F).

    […]

    Female activists said they wanted to express solidarity with Navalny’s wife, Yulia, and other women who have become victims of the crackdown.

    […]

    The new form of opposition rallies is similar to human chains formed by female activists in neighbouring Belarus.

    […] Navalny’s team postponed mass rallies until the spring or summer, but urged supporters to use Valentine’s Day to try out new and safer forms of protest.

    Navalny’s right-hand man, Leonid Volkov, has called on Russians to stage courtyard protests on Sunday evening, lighting their phone flashlights for 15 minutes and posting pictures of the gatherings on social media.

    Navalny’s team released pictures and video of small-scale gatherings that took place in eastern Russia and Siberia earlier on Sunday, with Russians lighting flashlights, sparklers and small lanterns.

    […]

    Russian officials have accused the opposition of acting on orders from Nato [also similar to Belarus –blf] and warned that anyone violating the law would be punished.

    We will not play cat and mouse with anyone, Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said.

  315. blf says

    Lynna@479, “There’s a poll at the end of the article. You can vote on the question: ‘Who is Donald Trump’s most gutless toady?'”

    Thanks! Currently, “They’re all worthless” has 70% (c.3500 “votes”) of the pharyngulable poll. (“Lapdog Lindsey Graham” is currently in second with 16%.)

  316. says

    Not political. Appropriate for Valentine’s Day.

    When Valentine’s Day rolls around each year, folks pull out their romance (or heartbreak) playlists, and there is plenty of both to be had from every Black music genre. New love, old love, spurned love, falling in and out of love has always been a top topic for lyricists, musicians and composers. Though the celebration of Valentine’s Day has ancient roots that have nothing to do with chocolates, hearts, candy, or even love, where music is concerned, we’ve got plenty of food for your feelings, so let’s spend the day with sumptuous sounds that won’t mess up your diet.

    This #BlackMusicSunday, we’ll sample a few tunes from the jazz songbook and set your hearts throbbing. […]

    Link

    Audio files are available at the link.

    Sarah Vaughan (one of my favorites)
    Arthur Prysock (reciting Walter Benton’s 1943 poem “This is My Beloved,” see excerpt below)
    Miles Davis
    and more

    Excerpt:

    Because hate is legislated . . . written into
    the primer and the testament,
    shot into our blood and brain like vaccine or vitamins

    Because our day is of time, of hours — and the clock-hand turns,
    closes the circle upon us: and black timeless night
    sucks us in like quicksand, receives us totally —
    without a raincheck or a parachute, a key to heaven or the last long look

    I need love more than ever now . . . I need your love,
    I need love more than hope or money, wisdom or a drink

    Because slow negative death withers the world — and only yes
    can turn the tide
    Because love has your face and body . . . and your hands are tender
    and your mouth is sweet — and God has made no other eyes like yours.

  317. says

    When you think about the question of whether to call witnesses or not, remember this:

    […] A House effort to secure testimony from former White House counsel Donald McGahn Jr. in the summer of 2019 remains in litigation a year and a half later, she [Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands)] noted. […]

    Washington Post link

  318. says

    Weekend Update (Saturday Night Live) anchor Colin Jost:

    Like so many other men living in Florida, Donald Trump has once again escaped from justice.

    This has to be the dumbest trial I’ve ever seen. Here’s how dumb it was: The jurors, who are deciding the case, were the ones attacked by defendant. The trial took place at the scene of the crime. And then right after the trial ended, one of the jurors who voted to acquit Trump ran out and said, “Someone’s got to prosecute this guy. He did it. This man belongs in jail.”

    What are you going to do? If you’re going to impeach the president for anything, don’t you think it’s sending a mob to kill the Vice President? I feel bad for Pence — 43 of his work friends were like, oh come on, Mike, they only tried to hang you. Stop being such a drama queen.

    I think it would be hilarious if Biden now sent rioters back into the Capitol. And he was like, What? You guys said it was fine.

  319. says

    Guardian – “Death of nurse detained over Covid curfew highlights violence faced by Honduran women”:

    Keyla Martínez screamed for help from inside the police cell, but no one came to save her.

    Martínez, a 26-year-old trainee nurse from La Esperanza, western Honduras, died in police custody last weekend after being detained for breaching a coronavirus curfew.

    Police officers initially claimed Martínez had killed herself. But a preliminary autopsy found she had died from “mechanical asphyxiation” and prosecutors announced they were investigating her death as a murder.

    She was the latest victim in a relentless wave of misogynistic killings and state-sponsored violence in Honduras – one of the most dangerous and corrupt countries in the Americas. Twenty-nine women have been killed so far this year in Honduras, which has a population of about 9 million – only slightly more than New York City.

    This week, security forces have teargassed protesters demanding truth and justice for the young nurse. Human rights groups are also demanding accountability amid the alarming escalation of deadly violence against women. At least six women have been killed since Martínez died.

    “This killing has all the hallmarks of an extrajudicial execution and must be investigated as such,” said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director at Amnesty International.

    “Grave human rights violations such as the killing of Keyla Martínez do not happen in a vacuum. They are the product of rampant impunity and the lack of political will to address the human rights crisis in Honduras. This dire context has produced a relentless and widespread stream of abuses by state security forces.”

    Honduras is one of the most dangerous countries in the world to be a woman or girl. It is a deeply machista society where conservative church leaders exert a powerful influence over the personal and political spheres – including women’s access to reproductive healthcare and protection from violence.

    Last month, congress voted to amend the constitution to make it virtually impossible to overturn the country’s abortion laws – which are already some of the strictest in Latin America.

    In 2009, a coup orchestrated by a network of military, economic, political and religious elites, ushered in an authoritarian government, which remains in power despite multiple allegations of corruption, extrajudicial killings, electoral fraud and ties to international drug trafficking networks.

    Since then emigration has risen dramatically, as hundreds of thousands of men, women and children have fled north looking for safety and jobs. A culture of impunity has also meant that violence against women has only worsened.

    In the decade before the coup, 222 women were murdered annually, according to analysis by the Centre for Women’s Studies – Honduras (CEM-H). In the past five years, 381 have been killed on average annually. Ninety-six per cent of the murders remain unsolved.

    “The militarization of the country since the coup has increased the threat to women’s lives, there are guns everywhere and we know the police have links to criminal gangs,” said Suyapa Martínez (no relation to Keyla Martínez) from CEM-H, a feminist organisation based in Tegucigalpa.

    Advocates claim that the government has used the pandemic as an excuse to crack down on legitimate protesters, poor Hondurans who have been left with no income because of the lockdown, and communities opposed to environmentally destructive mega-projects. Hundreds of people have been arrested for violating the 9pm-to-5am curfew that has been in place on and off since last May.

    Martínez, a final year nursing student, was visiting her family in La Esperanza last weekend and went out to eat with friends on Saturday evening.

    Zúniga added: “The suspension of constitutional rights, supposedly to curtail Covid, has not reduced the level of infection, but has increased the systematic violation of human rights by the police. Women are not safe at home, in the streets or in custody.”

    Reuters (see #229 above) – “Honduran president target of U.S. investigation, court filings show”:

    …The Honduran president has been a key U.S. ally in the region and the investigation could complicate the Biden administration’s efforts to invest $4 billion in Central America, including Honduras, to address the causes of migration.

    Last month, thousands of Hondurans joined one of the largest-ever migrant caravans hoping to reach the United States, with many citing rampant violence, government corruption, and worsening poverty as their reasons for leaving the country.

    Dana Frank, an expert on Honduras and professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said the revelations raised difficult questions for the new U.S. government of President Joe Biden.

    “Will the Biden administration, despite this further evidence, continue to shore up and fund Hernandez, including his corrupt police and military that protect drug shipments at his beck and call?” she said….

    Democrats have to stop siding with rightwing coupist oligarchs in Latin America. It’s morally indefensible, strategically foolish, and politically self-defeating.

  320. says

    Guardian – “Myanmar: troops and police forcefully disperse marchers in Mandalay”:

    Troops have joined police in forcefully dispersing marchers in the city of Mandalay in northern Myanmar, as protests against the military coup continued despite the deployment of extra soldiers in some areas and an eight-hour internet blackout overnight.

    The army has been carrying out nightly arrests and on Saturday gave itself sweeping powers to detain people and search private property. On Sunday, it published penal code amendments aimed at stifling dissent.

    “It’s as if the generals have declared war on the people,” UN special rapporteur Tom Andrews said on Twitter. “Late night raids; mounting arrests; more rights stripped away; another Internet shutdown; military convoys entering communities. These are signs of desperation. Attention generals: You WILL be held accountable.”

    The amendments to the penal code set out a 20-year prison term for inciting hatred of the government or military or hindering the security forces engaged in preserving state stability.

    Hindering the security forces carrying out their duties is punishable by seven years in prison while spreading fear, fake news or agitating against government employees gets three, according to the amendments posted on a military website.

    In the latest sign of disruption by workers, the government’s civil aviation department said in a statement many staff had stopped coming to work since 8 February, causing delays to international flights.

    A pilot, who asked not to be identified for fear of retribution, said hundreds of staff from the department were striking. Some trains also stopped running after staff refused to go to work, domestic media reported.

    More atl.

  321. says

    Here’s a link to the February 15 Guardian coronavirus world liveblog.

    From there:

    Police in Rio de Janeiro have raided a series of illegal carnival parties taking place despite a prohibition designed to halt the spread of coronavirus.

    Brazil is experiencing one of the worst moments of its epidemic, with the weekly average of deaths hitting a record high of 1,097 on Sunday. Nearly 240,000 people have now died here; second only to the US.

    Authorities across Brazil have banned carnival festivities this year with Rio’s official samba parades cancelled for the first time since they began in 1932. One of Brazil’s biggest samba stars, Neguinho da Beija-Flor, told one local newspaper that going ahead with carnival this year would have meant “parading on top of corpses”.

    But some have insisted on partying; including at Rio’s sophisticated Jockey Club racetrack, which was raided on Saturday. Police caught 200 people attending an illicit carnival ball. Black curtains and a metal fence had been erected to conceal the celebration.

    Illegal shindigs have also been held in Rio’s favelas. Hundreds of revellers reportedly turned out on Saturday night to see the pop star Belo perform on a stage in the Complexo da Maré, a sprawling community near Rio’s international airport.

    Floating all-night festivities have also been held on boats on Rio’s Guanabara Bay at the foot of the Sugarloaf Mountain.

  322. says

    Christiaan Triebert, NYT:

    At least six people providing security for Roger Stone participated in the Capitol attack, our new Visual Investigation shows. Here’s how the guards (all Oath Keepers) went from guarding Trump’s longtime confidant to standing inside the Capitol on Jan. 6:…

    We combed through hundreds of videos and photos and drew on research from @CTExposers to visually identify Mr. Stone’s guards on Jan. 5 and 6. — from that group, these six entered the Capitol during the insurrection….

    Much more atl.

  323. Paul K says

    SC @ 493: Damn, that’s almost overwhelming. But it also begs the question: why has this been allowed to go on so long and so deeply? If this (excellent) researcher can so easily show who is involved, and how this happened, then why aren’t more of them in trouble? I suppose many have been careful to not actually break any laws, or to cover their tracks well enough to make their law-breaking hard to prove.

    Still, that’s why we spend billions each year on countering this kind of stuff, allegedly.

  324. says

    In acquitting Trump, Republicans formalize their embrace of American fascism

    If you can legitimize both the nullification of an election and the use of violence to help accomplish it, there are no more lines to cross.

    The full malevolence of this new Republican Party nullification of consequences for political corruption—this time, in the form of a president sending a mob to block the certification of the U.S. election that would remove him from power, a president responding to the resulting violence by singling out to the mob his own specific enemies, then sitting back to watch the violence unfold on his television while taking no action to either contain the mob or protect the Congress, is difficult to even grasp.

    The ultimate irony of the Republican sabotage, however, is that impeachment was unquestionably the most appropriate remedy for Trump’s actions. It was an absolute necessity, and now the entire nation will suffer the consequences. Yet again.

    […] He betrayed his oath. He proved himself not just unfit for office, but a malevolent figure willing to use even violence against lawmakers as avenue for further political power.

    […] Trump knew that violence was occurring, and still used that violence to intimidate his enemies rather than swiftly demand reinforcements to protect Congress.

    There is no question of this. It is not in dispute.

    […] Trump may have left office the two weeks between coup and inauguration of his successor, but his dereliction was so severe that Congress was asked to offer up its only available constitutional remedy: barring him from future office. That was all. The Senate was not debating whether to jail Trump, or to exile him. The Senate was debating whether or not to bar Donald Trump, proven to be incompetent or malicious, from ever returning to an office […]

    Republican senators offered up a technicality-laced defense of insurrection as political act. […]

    Trump’s rally that day, and his months of hoax-based propaganda before it, were all premised around a demand to nullify a United States presidential election he did not win. […]

    It was, from the outset, an attempted coup. The very premise was to nullify an election so that he might be reappointed leader despite losing it. […]

    […] elections officials in Georgia and elsewhere were left to defend themselves against outrageous lies to whatever extent they were able.

    […] Trump went so far as to finance and schedule a mass rally of supporters to appear at the Capitol with instructions to let those inside know that the election must be overturned. Trump sat back and watched as violence quickly followed, and responded by goading the crowd to go after an enemy, by refusing congressional pleas for intervention, and by sneering at lawmakers fearing for their lives.

    […] This weekend saw what is perhaps the most consequential new recognition of the American fascist movement as quasi-legitimized political entity. Perhaps Trump’s Republican protectors intended such, and perhaps they did not, but the outcome will be the same.

    The contrary position here was, by comparison, effortless. Republican senators could have detached Trump from his position as would-be autocratic “leader” with a simple acknowledgement that his actions, during a time of true national crisis, were so horrific as to render him unfit for future office. […] His authoritarian cult would be deprived of the precise and only goal of its insurrection: re-installing him as leader.

    The message would have been clear: Violence as political tool is disqualifying. Forever.

    […] Not violence as political tool is unseemly, but due to various technicalities and the current schedule cannot be responded to. […] You are not allowed to spend months propagating fraudulent, malevolent hoaxes intended to delegitimize democracy itself rather than accept an election loss, culminating in a financed and organized effort to threaten the United States Congress with a mob of now-unhinged supporters demanding your reinstallation by force. […]

  325. says

    A summary of Trump’s current legal problems:

    […] As a private citizen, Trump is no longer protected by the Justice Department’s policy against charging a sitting president with federal crimes. And Trump, his family and businesses, also have to worry about investigations in various local jurisdictions and at least one foreign country […] Here are some highlights:

    Washington, DC: Prosecutors under Karl Racine, the District’s Attorney General, are considering charging Trump with violating a DC law against encouraging violence, CNN reported Friday. […] Racine has also sued Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee, charging it improperly funneled money to Trump’s DC hotel. That case remains active. […]

    Georgia: Prosecutors in the Peach State have opened a criminal investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn Georgia’s election results […]

    New York: New York Attorney General Letitia James is conducting a civil investigation into whether the Trump Organization inflated the values of his assets to win favorable loans and insurance coverage. Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance is also looking into loans Trump took out on some of his signature Manhattan properties […] “possibly extensive and protracted criminal conduct at the Trump Organization” that could include insurance fraud, tax fraud, or other schemes to avoid taxes and cook the books to win favorable loan terms.

    Scotland: The Scottish Parliament recently voted down a nonbinding measure calling for an anti–money laundering investigation into the finances of two resorts Trump owns in the country. But Trump’s Scottish critics remain suspicious that the properties, in which Trump has invested nearly $300 million without ever showing a profit, have been used to launder funds. The vote does not mean the country’s prosecutors aren’t investigating the money-losing resorts […] Some Scottish officials have said it signals that the parliament wants to keep politics out of any probe into the properties’ finances that may already be underway. Scottish investigators will neither confirm nor deny if an investigation is in progress, leaving it unclear what legal issues Trump faces there.

    Lawsuits: Trump’s two impeachments and other legal problems have distracted from the more than 26 allegations of sexual misconduct he still faces. […] E. Jean Carroll, a longtime advice columnist who says Trump raped her in a department store dressing room in late 1995 or early 1996, is pressing a [defamation] suit. Former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos, who alleges Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007, has also sued him for defamation. Trump […] used the Secret Service to help him evade service of a court summons […] He “claimed presidential immunity in state court, […] and had the Department of Justice intervene on his behalf,” […] Now those protections are gone. Lawyers for Zervos and Carroll, noting his arguments for delay are rendered moot by his defeat, are pressing judges to let them proceed with their cases.

    Congress: Congressional committees, all run by Democrats, are free to investigate all aspects of Trump’s conduct as president and as a private citizen. Notably, the House Judiciary Committee says it is still fighting to enforce subpoenas it issued in 2019 as part of its probe into Trump’s alleged obstruction of justice aimed at undermining Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Trump’s ties to Russia, among other things. That means the panel could still hear testimony about Trump’s alleged criminal conduct as president. And while Mueller declined to charge Trump with obstruction of justice due to a DOJ policy against indicting a sitting president, Merrick Garland’s Justice Department could still file charges against private citizen Trump.

    Link

  326. says

    Iran says it will block snap nuclear inspections if 2015 deal terms are not met

    Iran’s government on Monday warned that it would end the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s ability to conduct snap inspections of nuclear sites in the country unless the U.S. and European countries involved in the 2015 nuclear accord fulfill their end of the agreement and lift sanctions.

    A spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry made the announcement, according to Reuters, setting a Feb. 21 deadline for the U.S. and other countries to relax sanctions reimposed after the U.S. left the nuclear accord in 2017 under the Trump administration.

    “If others do not fulfill their obligations by Feb. 21, the government is obliged to suspend the voluntary implementation of the Additional Protocol,” spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said, according to the news service.

    “It does not mean ending all inspections by the U.N. nuclear watchdog…All these steps are reversible if the other party changes its path and honours its obligations,” he continued. […]

    The International Atomic Energy Agency, which handles inspections of Iran’s nuclear facilities under the direction of the U.N., said in a confidential report this month that Iran has further enriched uranium that could be used to make nuclear weapons despite the government’s denials […]

  327. says

    India activist arrested over circulating Greta Thunberg ‘toolkit’

    An Indian activist was taken into custody after being accused by officials of editing and circulating a “toolkit” that Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg tweeted out sharing how to support the farmers’ protests going on across the Asian nation.

    Activist Disha Ravi is being charged with sedition and criminal conspiracy as authorities have accused her of being a “key conspirator” for the toolkit and have accused her of spreading “disaffection with the Indian state,” The Guardian reported.

    The move was quickly met with protests and criticism.

    Ravi’s arrest is “an unprecedented attack on Democracy. Supporting our farmers is not a crime,” said Delhi chief minister Arwind Kejriwal.

    Ravi admitted to editing two lines in the file during her court hearing, but police claim they have evidence that she did more than edit those two lines.

    The court ordered Ravi to stay in police custody for five days as the police wanted time to “unearth her connections with the Sikhs for Justice,” according to The Guardian.

    The toolkit was shared by Thunberg to support farmers who have been protesting new agricultural laws that affect the pricing and storage of farmers’ produce.

    Thunberg has seen a lot of hate over her support of farmers with some counterprotesters burning effigies of the Swedish teen. […]

    “Delhi police’s actions are all the more sinister because Disha was taken to Delhi with no disclosure about her whereabouts, not even to her parents, an action that can be termed extrajudicial abduction,” said the Coalition for Environmental Justice in India, The Guardian reported. […]

  328. says

    Wonkette: “Ron DeSantis To President Biden: Who Are You To Judge My Superspreader State?”

    Florida GOP Governor Ron DeSantis thinks (if we generously use that word) that President Joe Biden is “playing politics” with COVID-19 because the president wants to actually do something about the virus. “Sunday Morning Futures” host Maria Bartiromo let DeSantis vent unchallenged about a Miami Herald report claiming that unnamed officials within the Biden administration are plotting a domestic travel ban targeting Florida and other states with reported outbreaks of the COVID-19 UK variant, which is more contagious and possibly more lethal.

    DeSantis claimed the very idea is just a “political attack” intended to “punish a state that is doing it better than what [Biden’s] experts have recommended.” Florida reported 5,436 coronavirus cases on Sunday. That’s slightly better than the state’s previous daily average of more than 7,000 cases […]

    He whined about the proposed ban, which the Biden administration hasn’t confirmed, last week when he compared apples to racist oranges. “The recent report that the Biden administration is considering restricting the travel of Floridians is completely absurd, especially when Biden allows illegal aliens to pour across our southern border. We won’t allow Floridians to be unfairly targeted for political purposes.”

    Biden has been in office for a less than a month. How many undocumented immigrants could’ve “poured” across the border in that time? Besides, it’s a completely unrelated point. […]

    Florida is now a flaming COVID-19 dumpster fire.

    Infectious disease specialist Dr. Kleper De Almeida told WPTV in West Palm Beach that what’s most concerning about the UK COVID-19 variant in Florida is that, “over the past few days, we have seen a progressive escalation in the number of new cases. ”

    Yeah, that superspreader Super Bowl event last Sunday was probably a bad idea. […]

    Since January 7, a week after the UK COVID-19 variant was first detected in Martin County, the Florida Department of Health has gone radio silent about which other counties in the state had confirmed the strain. That seems like important information they should share.

    The Orlando Sentinel reports:

    During that time, reported cases of the mutation spiraled to 347 as of Friday — over twice as many as the next closest state, California, which has 159. And the secrecy has continued without explanation, despite ongoing updates from the CDC, which has reported state-by-state totals for much of the nation.

    Some counties, including Orange and Miami-Dade, have voluntarily disclosed the number of variant cases on their own, but many haven’t. Guess we’ll never know! There’s no clear evidence of a coverup, but DeSantis has a sketchy history when it comes to COVID-19 and transparency. […]

    After reopening the state in May, he’s resisted most sensible mitigation efforts, including mask mandates. He let restaurants, gyms, bars, and most other businesses open at full capacity in September. Cities with competent mayors instituted their own restrictions, but DeSantis made it all but impossible to enforce them. […]

    DESANTIS: Biden is a lockdowner. His advisers are lockdowners. Lockdowns don’t work.

    They do in fact work.

    DESANTIS: We’re not turning back and they will not be able to get away with targeting Florida.

    Full steam ahead into the pandemic iceberg! That’s the DeSantis motto, we guess.