This week on the Evangelical Realism blog, we wrap up a very confused Chapter 6 with a look at how Christians can use an equivocal definition of “objective morality” to trick people into substituting a superstition-based morality for a reality-based one.
maddog1129 says
I noticed this part of the linked discussion:
that’s the problem through and through with talking to theists. They won’t define their terms and they won’t use them consistently.
Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort says
QualiaSoup just came out with a video addressing Craig’s Chapter 6