Michael Reagan has decided, in his defense of one Mr. O’Reilly, to focus on … cleavage! Surprised, right? C’mon, no one ever could have guessed that one, no, no. The sheer nerve of women, existing with those inconveniently placed bumps, let alone wearing something low cut. Oooh, the evil.
Conservative commentator Michael Reagan, the son of former president Ronald Reagan, defended Bill O’Reilly this morning over claims that the recently fired Fox News host sexually harassed women.
Reagan, a contributor to the conservative outlet Newsmax, shared posts on Facebook and Twitter insisting that if women wear “low cut dresses,” then men should consider suing “for sexual arousal”
There was a link to that tweet, I removed it as the tweet in question is now gone. It would seem Mr. Reagan got some feedback on that one which he didn’t like.
“If women are going to wear low cut dresses that show cleavage don’t be harassed when we men look. Or shld we sue for sexual arousal?”
Oh, so that’s how it works, women just have to decide we aren’t harassed. Ever. Then everything will be okely dokely!
Another deleted Tweet stated:
Hot Choclare used to be a compliment on your looks today it is called sexual harassment..@oreillyfactor
— Michael Reagan (@ReaganWorld) April 21, 2017
It’s been replaced with this one:
If someone calls u brown sugar because u are in their eyes gorgeous and blk.2 them it's a compliment 2 U it's harrassment,then tell them.
— Michael Reagan (@ReaganWorld) April 22, 2017
“If someone calls u brown sugar because u are in their eyes gorgeous and blk.2 them it’s a compliment 2 U it’s harrassment, then tell them.”
Oh, the denseness of someone who absolutely refuses to get the point. What you think about anyone’s appearance, and how it affects your boner has no place at all in any relationship other than a mutually intimate one.
Via RWW.
Think he doth project too much?
Why yes, yes I do.
Remember that feminists are evil men hating harpies who declare all men to be rapists but good upstanding , moral men declare that they cannot be expected to behave themselves at the smallest sight of female flesh. I always want to know the exact amount and location of bare skin I must show in order not to be a sl*t while also not wearing a burq’a which we know only those backwards brown men put on their women.
@Giliell
More than nothing and less than everything is probably as accurate information as you will get on this issue from anyone.
I am ashamed to admit that I have said similar things about twenty years ago -- that if women do not want to have their breast oggled at, they should not wear cleavage. I have changed since then but it still makes me cringe to remember some of the dumb shit I used to believe and say when I was young and dumb.
Charly
I call it the One Inch Rule: The appropriate skirt length/ cleavage is always about one inch more than what you’ve been wearing at the point of harassment/groping/assault, regardless of what you’ve been wearing.
Except when the guy is Muslim.
Hey mister good old white christian guy, get that wonderful god of yours to give you the strength to control your passions! Why, if an evil old white atheist guy like me can manage it, should be a doddle for a man of your position!
Lofty @6: TRUE DAT!!
I thought republicans were supposed to be the model of self-control and responsibility. These idiots have NO self-control and they refuse to take personal responsibility for their own actions. SAD!