Rush Limbaugh, Senate Republicans, run headlong for the Republic of Gilead


Update: Top notch comments below the post. Keep it going, readers, this is good, usable stuff.

Rush Limbaugh, with an assist by the Sons of Jacob serving in the Senate, laid bare the misogynistic bent of the modern GOP and their unhealthy projection of their own perversions on women the nation over this week:

(NY Daily News) — Rush Limbaugh ratcheted up the rhetoric Thursday in the debate over requiring health insurers to cover contraceptives, saying women who want coverage should should make sex videos. His comments followed his attack on Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke, whom he called a “slut” on Wednesday for testifying on Capitol Hill in favor of the idea.

Such a terrible, evil, rotten sluuut. So awful and immoral that … Rush, the married lover of Viagra and presumably birth control — as four marriages have failed to produce a single child — and by extension anyone who agrees with his, umm, position, would like to whack off 24/7 to a vast selection of these slutty bitches in hot, one-on-one action available for free on youTube …

So far not one elected Republican politician has denounced his broadcast. In fact Republicans doubled down on Rush’s tirade.

(Link) — In an election-year battle mixing birth control, religion and politics, Senate Democrats narrowly blocked an effort by Republicans to overturn President Barack Obama’s order that most employers or their insurers cover the cost of contraceptives. The 51-48 vote on Thursday killed a measure that would have allowed employers and insurers to opt out of portions of the president’s health care law that they found morally objectionable. That would have included the law’s requirement to cover the costs of birth control.

That same bill would have allowed an employer to choose health insurance plans denying care for any condition, for any reason, as long as that reason is couched as a religious or moral objection. Need a blood transfusion? Better hope there’s not a Jehovah’s Witness on the board of directors. In fact, there wouldn’t even need to be a Witness anywhere in the company, employers could deny everything from antibiotics to surgery simply by claiming it violated their conscience. How much money might employers save if they suddenly found diabetes, heart disease, or cancer morally objectionable?

Most people fighting the GOP on this are quick to point that it’s not a religious issue, that religion is being misused as cover for a War on Women. But this ignores an uncomfortable fact: fundamentalist Christianity, like fundamentalist Islam and many other faiths, is explicitly anti-democratic, at least if you believe women should have a vote, be able to own property, choose who they marry, or divorce abusive husbands. Fact is the GOP base is simply following that hard-line Old Testament religious mandate when they vote against women’s rights.

Any women who votes for these bozos is probably too far gone to save and may be absolutely out of her fucking mind. And GOP guys, it may be pointless to mention facts, but the last time birth control was illegal, there was no such thing as genetic testing and court mandated child support. Then again it wouldn’t take a theocracy long to strip those laws and ban genetic testing. After all, it’s the always women’s fault, and babies are always a blessing; any women should consider herself lucky if God-eh rewards her with the miracle of birth for her flagrant sin, or for asking to be raped. Just ask any Handmaid in Gilead.

Comments

  1. says

    These poop-headed snots should realise that it’s simple:
     
    If I find some act I could do morally objectionable, I don’t do it.
    If you find some act you could do morally objectionable, you don’t do it.
    If I find some act you could do morally objectionable, I just quietly shake my head and get on with my life.

  2. d cwilson says

    I’m still trying to figure out how allowing my employer to decide what health care procedures I’m entitled to is “religious freedom”. I mean, if my employer is an anti-vaccine nutbar, my kids are just supposed to suck it up, get measles, and hope they don’t die from it?

    (I don’t actually have kids, this just an anology).

  3. gvlgeologist says

    I’m thinking that the converse could also be true. Suppose an employer could decide that there are treatments that they INSIST be covered by insurance. Homeopathy, acupuncture, etc.

    Suppose a Rastafarian was on the board…

  4. Trebuchet says

    These poop-headed snots should realise that it’s simple:

    I initially scanned that as “pope-headed snots”. Which also works.

  5. busterggi says

    As a taxpayer, the members of the Senate, and the House, are my employees.

    I find it morally objectionable that they have health insurance while I cannot afford it.

    Therefore I am ordering that all health insurance for all congresspersons be halted immediately.

  6. says

    If there was a demand by Muslims for a religious exemption (based on Sharia Law) to a secular law, how loud would the protests be?

    These are nasty, abhorrent, evil, small-minded little toads.

    Frankly, I weep for our country that they appear to have so many people agree with them.

  7. stevegerrard says

    I thought the fun was over after Michigan. Turns out there is another reel after all. Let’s all go to the lobby – again!

  8. carrie says

    Let’s call them on it: show up at every event in slutty outfits with signs like Sluts4Mitt or Sluts4Rick. Or Tell me what to do you dominant male! Embarrass the shit out of them. If you have an election this week go there too.

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply