This question came up in response to a new Elon Musk tweet that asserted, “Laws are on one side, poets on the other.” I think that it’s wrongheaded and under appreciates what lawyerly skill entails.
The best lawyers are often poetic (even if it doesn’t seem that way in certain filings/statements), since skill with the law requires keeping multiple possible meanings in your head at the same time. Just writing a contract requires something that may look like anti-poetry, but the reason is that the drafting lawyer is going through the process of anticipating possible alternative meanings and excluding them.
Poets, too, have to anticipate possible alternative meanings, though they only exclude the ones that disrupt their intent and deliberately import those ambiguous, multiple-meaning phrases that enhance their intent. Likewise, when the lawyer isn’t drafting something precisely, but rather finding the advantage in something already written (often a statute, but it could be a contract previously drafted), it’s to the client’s great advantage for the lawyer to see multiple meanings in single phrases and craft an argument that employs the most favorable meanings rather than the most obvious ones.
Skill with puns and poetry is correlated with skill in the law. If you’ve got puns, poetry, and logic all down, you’ll probably be great.
Great American Satan says
this naturally raises the question, what are some examples of law you find poetic?
John Morales says
Sometimes, I tell myself”: “I could’ve been a lawyer”.
Crip Dyke, Right Reverend Feminist FuckToy of Death & Her Handmaiden says
@Great American Satan:
Writing for the Supreme Court of Canada, former Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin is the most poetic of the justices with which I’m familiar, including nicely turned phrases in every dissent and decision. (Though I should point out that it’s much easier to be poetic in a dissent.) A good example of her in dissent is Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG).
It’s not inappropriate to note that her opinion won in the end when Rodriguez was later overturned in Carter.
Of the other recent Justices on the SCC, Claire L’Heureux-Dubé is probably the most poetic, and she can be a joy to read. It should be noted, though, that no decision is truly poetic throughout: the form of a judicial decision requires citations and other writing that interrupts the flow. The most poetic you’ll ever find a lawyer is likely in closing arguments. In criminal cases the prosecution generally shies away from poetry in their oratory as it’s considered “unseemly” to invoke wordplay in so serious a matter as taking away someone’s freedom. Defense lawyers don’t seem to be bound by this (at least not to the same extent) but public defenders often simply don’t have the time to craft a closing argument so carefully. If you want the most poetic writing or oratory you can find from a lawyer, then, what you look for are closing arguments on behalf of an underdog plaintiff in a civil case or a defendant in a criminal case. Unfortunately those trial court transcripts are harder to sift than one would like. It’s much easier to remember half a phrase from a supreme court decision and find that again than it is to remember half a phrase from a defense lawyer’s closing argument and find a particular trial court action.
So let’s stick with appellate decisions when moving to the USA. I consider Kagan the most poetic of the current US justices, though (and, yes, it gags me to say it) Clarence Thomas can muster a poetic turn of phrase now and again. Scalia was pretty good in his day, and Sotomayor is good enough that some find her a better writer than Kagan, but it’s Kagan for me overall in the written form (while Sotomayor would get the nod from me in oral rhetoric and persuasiveness).
As an example, consider Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment. Kimble invented a back-of-the-action-figure push button which Marvel wanted to use for its Spider Man toys way back when. They signed a contract to give Kimble royalties on its patent, but then after the fact Marvel discovered that patents have a 20 year lifetime (at least these patents and most patents in the US…there are exceptions in other categories). Marvel wanted to quit paying royalties since the patent had expired, sued, won a judgement entitling them to stop payments, and Kimble then appealed to SCOTUS:
Fry vs. Napoleon Community Schools is another decision that incorporates some poetic phrases.
invivoMark says
I think someone who says that lawyers are opposite from poets is someone who has only had experiences with bad lawyers.
The lawyers I’ve known (and I count among them personal friends and professional colleagues) have almost all been incredibly creative, especially with language… and yes, some of the best punners I’ve known.
I’m not a lawyer, so the best I can say in response to Musk’s tweet is, “Wrong. Next question.”
brucegee1962 says
On the side of the poets, no one can say it better than the great W.H. Auden in “Law like Love”:
Like love we don’t know where or why,
Like love we can’t compel or fly,
Like love we often weep.
Like love we seldom keep.
http://web.mit.edu/cordelia/www/Poems/law_like_love.html
Some Old Programmer says
I’m biased, but I quite like the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s opinion from Goodridge v. Department of Public Health. As a measurement, an opinion is excerpted in a wedding ceremony likely qualifies as poetry.
ardipithecus says
Beverley McLachlin has written a couple of novels; Full Disclosure (2018) which I much enjoyed, and Denial (just released) which i will read as soon as I can get my grubby little paws on it.