A story told by “A Mighty Girl” (which is a group) on the eponymous Facebook page.
In celebration of today’s Boston Marathon, we’re sharing the dramatic story of the first woman to officially run the historic race. Kathrine Switzer’s experience is a revealing illustration of the barriers that trailblazing women athletes had to overcome and of how far girls and women in sports have come in only a few decades.
In 1967, Switzer was a 20-year-old college student at Syracuse University when she registered for the race using her initials, K.V. Switzer. Not realizing that she was a woman, who were barred from participating in the Boston Marathon for over 70 years, race officials issued her an entry number.
During the race, marathon official Jock Semple attempted to physically remove Switzer from the marathon after discovering she was female. Other runners, including Switzer’s boyfriend Tom Miller, blocked Semple and she was able to complete the marathon. Pictures of the incident and the story of Switzer’s participation in the marathon made global headlines.
After the marathon, Switzer became deeply engaged in efforts to increase girls’ and women’s access to sports and she and other women runners finally convinced the Boston Athletic Association to drop their discriminatory policies and allow women to participate in 1972. By 2011, nearly 43 percent of Boston Marathon entrants were female. Switzer also helped lead the drive for the inclusion of a women’s marathon in the Olympic Games — a victory which was achieved at long last with the first women’s marathon at the 1984 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles.
It seems so outlandish now. It’s not a contact sport, there’s plenty of oxygen for all; why on earth were women kept out?
jenBPhillips says
Yes, it’s odd, isn’t it. Here’s more:
“In 1966, Roberta Gibb hid behind a bush at the start of the Boston Marathon, sneaking into the field and finishing the race in an unofficial time of 3:21:25. She was the first woman known to complete the arduous Boston course. Gibb had been inspired to run by the return of her race entry with a note saying that women were not physically capable of running a marathon.
“I hadn’t intended to make a feminist statement,” said Gibb. “I was running against the distance [not the men] and I was measuring myself with my own potential.”
The following year, number 261 in the Boston Marathon was assigned to entrant K.V. Switzer. In lieu of the pre-race medical examination, Switzer’s coach took a health certificate to race officials and picked up the number. Not until two miles into the race did officials realize that Switzer was a woman, twenty-year-old Kathrine Switzer of Syracuse University. Race director Will Cloney and official Jock Semple tried to grab Switzer and remove her from the race, or at least remove her number, but her teammates from Syracuse fended them off with body blocks. Switzer eventually finished the race after the race timers had stopped running, in 4:20. Switzer had not used her initials on the entry form to deceive the race officials. She was merely a fan of J.D. Salinger and liked the sound of her initials. While Switzer was creating a stir with her unauthorized entry, Roberta Gibb again ran the race, this time being forced off the course just steps from the finish line, where her time would have been 3:27:17.” (my bold)
Stevarious, Public Health Problem says
Well, you know… . It’s more of a ‘guy’ thing, innit? Running? Women aren’t really interested in it.
moarscienceplz says
It seems a pretty safe bet that Mr. Semple is dead now. It’s incidents like these that make me really wish an afterlife existed. I would love to think of him, and the Alabamians who spit on little black kids trying to walk to school, and others of that ilk, spending eternity shamefacedly apologizing for their actions.
jenBPhillips says
http://www.marathonguide.com/history/olympicmarathons/chapter25.cfm
Here’s the source for the above quote. The ‘women aren’t physically capable’ argument just stinks to high heaven, too, doesn’t it? Female athletes are not unicorns–even before there were organized sports for women, women still did physical things. It seems like more of an insult to the mental capacity of women than to their physical abilities–as if women on the whole would be far too stupid to be able to judge whether they were capable of running a marathon. If it were open to women, some unqualified people might just sign up, pass out at mile 8, and clog up the course. Sigh.
John Duffy says
the BBC is the glory of Britain.
Readers may like to access a recent BBC piece regarding this story, which was broadcast last week.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01x9y24
John Duffy.
leni says
Lol Semple’s constipation face in that picture is priceless, thanks for sharing that Ophelia! That is a national treasure indeed.
And that was a lot of fun backstory jenBphillips, thanks also 🙂
leni says
It’s actually like he’s crying and constipated, I can’t stop laughing at it. Oh god I’m probably making the same face now XD
jenBPhillips says
He’s probably vexed because he couldn’t OUTRUN her. ;P
Seth says
Am I the only one who’s grocking the seemingly world-historical irony of a regressive sports official being named Jock Semple? (Say that last name out loud. 😉
Also, it’s good to see there were at least a few men back then who were willing to stand up for what was right.
leni says
Seth:
Semple….Semple… I’m not hearing it?
But yeah, best cockblock ever lol.
***
jenBPhillips
Whatever it is, it’s very amusing! Probably the MRAs would spin that as something like “Man with no training and dress shoes would have caught feral female Boston Marathoner if not for pussy-whipped white knights.”
A. Noyd says
Semple looks a lot like John Lithgow there.
~*~*~*~*~*~
leni (#10)
Simple. As in, not too bright.
Blanche Quizno says
“why on earth were women kept out?”
Because boobs.
leni says
Lol ok I walked right into that one, but in my defense I was expecting there to be Semper Fi or something. I just wan’t feeling it ><!
chigau (違う) says
On a similar note
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libby_Riddles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Butcher
jaggington says
British Pathé has a clip at Annual Boston Marathon (1967) which includes a shot of Kathrine Switzer, although there’s no sound.
jaggington says
Actually, there’s plenty more interesting clips if you just search for Boston Marathon 1967 at YouTube.
=8)-DX says
The corrolary to boobs is always boner.
The men were all afraid those jugly ladyparts would cause erections, thereby making races a total farce and retrospectively scandalising all the women.
Matt Penfold says
“It seems a pretty safe bet that Mr. Semple is dead now. It’s incidents like these that make me really wish an afterlife existed. I would love to think of him, and the Alabamians who spit on little black kids trying to walk to school, and others of that ilk, spending eternity shamefacedly apologizing for their actions.”
Semple actually changed his position before he died, and became a strong advocate for the participation of women in athletics.
chrisho-stuart says
I’m just glad there’s life; and that people may learn and change in the time they have available to do so.
Here’s another picture for you, showing Jock Semple and Katherine Switzer together with a mutual hug at the start of the 1973 Boston marathon. By this time, women were permitted, and Jock had reversed his position on the matter. Well done to both Jock and Katherine.
http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/U1770509/jock-semple-and-katherine-switzer
leftwingfox says
Last year, Meredith Fitzmaurice was planing on running the half-marathon in Amherstburg, Ontario, but wound up on the track for the full Marathon instead.
Which she then won. 🙂
http://www.cbc.ca/asithappens/features/2013/09/25/woman-enters-half-marathon-ends-up-winning-full-by-mistake/
Yes!
left0ver1under says
It’s the same as the idiots who run ski jumping. Women were barred from olympics jumping until this year (but only one event) and the FIS wouldn’t organize a women’s world championship because the FIS was “concerned it would damage their ability to have babies”. That’s paraphrased, but it was their actual argument.
More likely, they were concerned that women were going to beat the men because women of the same height and weight as men will be stronger. On the same hill in 2014, the women’s distances were equal to the men’s. The women’s gold and silver medallists jumped further than all the men except the gold medal winner.
Back to running, it was the same excuse used to bar women from the marathon in the olympics, that women were “too fragile”. Some tried to use Gabriela Andersen’s finish in 1984 as an excuse to eliminate the women’s marathon after it was just put in just that year. Her staggering finish was the exception, but was portrayed as the way all the women finished.
chrisho-stuart says
Addit: I did cringe a bit at the text associated with the photo from 1973 that I posted above.
In showing that Jock and Katherine were now on the same side for the 1973 Boston marathon, the text says:
“Boston Marathon official, who for years was against women running in the famous Boston Marathon, poses with pretty Katherine Switzer (L) a marathoner from the Central Park A.C., prior to start of the 77th annual race.”
It’s unfortunate that the description of Jock gives his history and change of heart, while the description of Katherine omits her pivotal role and simply notes she’s “pretty”. Sigh.
Still and all, the main thing for me is the positive news that people can change.
RobNYNY1957 says
The hostility is baffling. The women in my family have been making a living for themselves and their families since the potato famines, and have never encountered such hostility. Courtesan, ballet dancer, chicken farmer, school teacher, laundress.
blf says
I am particularly intrigued by this bit, “Other runners, including Switzer’s boyfriend Tom Miller, blocked Semple”, and (paraphrasing, from other sites) “members of the Sycruse[?] team bodyblocked…”. Without doing any research. that makes if seem like Switzer had “accomplices” — possibly pre-planned, possibly spur-of-the-moment, possibly both — and in any case, BARVO! To Switzer, to her “accomplices”, and (apparently), to Semple for eventually admitting he was wrong (and to organizers in much of the rest of the world for dropping the restrictions).
blf says
“BARVO!”? Drats, “BRAVO!“…
Ophelia Benson says
I’d fix it, but I like Barvo. 🙂
John Duffy says
I mentioned the BBC radio account of the race in an earlier post, which I do still recommend.
Switzer’s boyfriend, a football player (American football, I mean), decided that if she could run a marathon, then so could he. She was ahead in the race when she was apprehended; her boyfriend just happened to catch up as she was being man-handled and immediately steamed in with a body-block to Semple that sent him flying. The men from Syracuse were not accomplices as such, in the sense of planning it all out, but she’d been allowed to train with them for a while and they liked her. When she turned up to the race, they were willing to shield her from the view of officials.