Society6.com
Ann Coulter is at it again, this time opining about the Tiny Tyrant’s apparent waffling on Dreamers. Ms. Coulter has solutions to the incredibly evil problem of treating other people with care, dignity, and respect.
Last week, Coulter appeared on the “Todd Starnes Show” to discuss Trump’s apparent willingness to betray his campaign promise to oppose programs like DACA, which is designed to protect people who immigrated illegally to the United States as children.
“We have made as clear as you can possibly make it, we want less immigration,” Coulter said. “Stop dumping the third-world on the country.”
Y’know, Ms. Coulter, the original inhabitants of this country weren’t too thrilled with your ancestors deciding to park their arses here. You could do the nice thing and leave.
She then claimed that Trump was elected into the White House because of his stance on immigration and bemoaned Trump’s recent mixed signals on the DACA program.
“If he continues down this path, well I guess there are three options. There’s the organizing the death squads for the people who ruined America, because there will be no more hope,” Coulter said.
Well, your ancestors ruined Turtle Island, so I don’t think you get to whine about “your amerika” getting ruined. So, your solution is to what? Get a committee of milk white people who have passed a genetic purity test to decide which degree of white is acceptable, and which degrees deserve death? I don’t think there’s enough shut the fuck up in the universe for you, Ms. Coulter. You mouth this shit without a second thought, in the middle of a struggle against fascism, without any thought of all the shite supremacists out there who might think that’s a mighty fine idea. Or perhaps you’re counting on that.
After some hesitation Coulter continued, “I guess the other possibility is to – well I don’t think anyone would mind him being impeached. What’s the faction opposing that? And then at least we’ll get Mike Pence. But in terms of saving America, maybe a third party.”
The Religious Reich would oppose impeachment, and they have more power than you do, Ms. Coulter. Oh, a third party! Who might that be, Paul Ryan? Zombie Hitler? I’m sure we’re all in suspense here.
Via RWW.
Nope. He was “elected” into the White House because of the drastically undemocratic Electoral College. This century has seen two Republican presidents, neither of whom were initially democratically elected. (Shrub winning the popular vote for his second term really dropped the US down in my opinion.)
The whole 3rd party thing is a scam: it woukd rapidly coalesce around dotcombros and corporate interests -- probably with a gilded floral veneer of libertarianism. Rather than liberation from the 2 party system it would represent the final leveraged-buyout of the political system; the party of Exxon, Verizon, and Hobby Lobby.
Marcus:
That would be hell. For real.
When the Tea Party started it was anti-2party and even had distinct anarcho-libertarian overtones. Then, corporatist/libertarian/authoritarian money poured in and the agenda changed. Ultimately they were appealing to oligarchs to defeat oligarchy; fail.
I really tried, hard, to ignore the tea party, but there’s no ignoring the legacy of it: Trumpholes.
Would not such a third party split the conservative vote?
If it was corporate party, no, because all the conservative pols are already owned by one or more.
I wonder, should this not count as incitement to violence? Even with those ridiculous “free speech” standards you have in USA?