Satanic Sedition and Heads on Pikes.


ParadiseLButts1

William Blake‘s illustration of Satan as presented in John Milton‘s Paradise Lost. Illustration was made on c. 1808.

Rick Wiles has decided there’s a Satanic Panic going on, and of course it’s being orchestrated by none other than former President Obama.

“We are witnessing a full-blown Marxist/communist resistance movement, a revolution in America,” Wiles said. “The chief banker funding the Purple Revolution is billionaire George Soros and the chief community organizer directing the insurrection in the streets is none other than Barack Hussein Obama … My gut feeling says Barack Obama is on the phone day and night and he is directing the protests, he is organizing, he is giving clear instructions to the people what to do and how to carry it out.”

Waitaminute, who decided the colour of the revolution? I’m good with purple and all, but we should have been asked. Oooh, it’s Wiles’s gut! I’ll just bet it’s a fact factory, of the alternative sort. I’d love to hear from Pres. Obama! What with being super powerful and stuff, he has my number, right? As for the constant refrain of Soros!, I haven’t seen a bloody penny. If people are getting paid for activism, it’s news to me and everyone else down here in the purple.

Wiles, who repeatedlycalled for Obama to be arrested and imprisoned when he was still in the White House, said that the recent protests against Trump are nothing short of sedition, which is itself inherently satanic.

“This is outright sedition,” he declared, “and we have laws in the United States against sedition…. What the Democrats are doing, and the news media and the Obamanista bureaucrats inside the government agencies, what they are doing is, these are acts of sedition.”

Sedition is so defined: incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government. Sedition is one of those concepts that finds itself entwined on the thorny ground of hallowed free speech. It’s rarely charged, (in uStates) and when it is, most people are acquitted. In 1917, Art Young did this political cartoon (click for full size):

784px-Jesus_wanted_poster

I imagine Mr. Wiles hasn’t seen it, and it probably wouldn’t matter if he did. He’d still be busy screaming sedition! Considering the sheer amount of people who are more than unhappy with the current state of fascism, you’d have to arrest well over half of all people living in the States. That would certainly keep the courts busy, and probably cause the collapse of pretty much everything else, but what does that matter when your priority is quashing any and all dissent?

“You wanna get God worked up? You know what sedition reminds Him of?” Wiles asked. “Lucifer. It all goes back to Lucifer because what Lucifer did in heaven was commit sedition … So all acts of sedition are inspired by Lucifer.”

Lucifer gets a seriously bad rap in Christian Mythology. It isn’t Lucifer who was busy having uncontrollable temper tantrums, and mentally mindfucking people for fun, detailed in the old testament. It’s full of evil, immoral acts – genocide, wars, slavery, slaughter for no reason, rapes about every other page, and so on. That was all Jehovah. Also, the psychopathic monstrosity that is Jehovah can’t operate without a villain. Classic hero storyline, just one without a hero. As villains go, Lucifer is extremely laid back, and not into doing evil. It’s right there, in the big book of myths.

As such, Wiles warned that those who are opposing Trump are not only breaking the laws against sedition, but are also “breaking God’s laws.”

I could not possibly care less about the fictional Jehovah. I wouldn’t care if it was real. A god like that screams out to be overthrown and killed, as you would any evil. And I plan to be as seditious as I can be, even without Lucifer’s help. I will not go quietly into the fascist night.

Via RWW.

Caravaggio - David con la testa di Golia.

Caravaggio – David con la testa di Golia.

Moving on to Lance Wallnau, always given to purplest of prose, who is crowing about his king parading heads.

Lance Wallnau hailed “the king” Donald Trump for taking on his enemies in the media and the Democratic Party.

He claimed that since God has anointed Trump, members of the media will only suffer when they challenge him. Wallnau lauded “the king” for attacking critical reports about him as “fake news.”

He went on to compare Trump’s public meeting with labor union leaders to David bringing Goliath’s head to Jerusalem, as described in 1 Samuel, explaining that Trump is parading his victory over his rivals in the labor-aligned Democratic Party.

I wonder how long it will be before someone thinks heads on pikes is ready for a comeback, American style. Wallnau’s insistence on referring to Trump as King is seriously disturbing enough.  As for Wallnau’s choice of story, there are two interesting things in the whole David and Goliath story. In the recounting of the slaying, Saul doesn’t know who David is:

17:55 And when Saul saw David go forth against the Philistine, he said unto Abner, the captain of the host, Abner, whose son is this youth? And Abner said, As thy soul liveth, O king, I cannot tell.

17:56 And the king said, Enquire thou whose son the stripling is.

In just the previous chapter, though, Saul knows very well who David is, very well indeed.

16:21 And David came to Saul, and stood before him: and he loved him greatly; and he became his armourbearer.

16:22 And Saul sent to Jesse, saying, Let David, I pray thee, stand before me; for he hath found favour in my sight.

Then there’s the question of who actually killed Goliath. 1 Samuel says David, but in 2 Samuel, that’s not the case:

21:19 And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew [the brother of] Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.

‘The brother of’ was added by the editors of the KJV, so as to avoid the contradiction. Outside of those tidbits, the story is yet another one of pointless slaughter, just like all the rest.

Via RWW.

Comments

  1. samihawkins says

    https://ibb.co/hF18yv

    Huh, so it’s not just something he made up. It’s an actual thing going around the asshole-o-sphere.

    I like ‘Resistance’ because Star Wars geek, but I gotta admit ‘Purple Revolution’ sounds pretty cool.

  2. Dunc says

    So the United States was founded by Satanists, unlawfully rebelling against their rightful King, as anointed by God, right? Or is that somehow different?

  3. says

    Huh. It originated with Bush Jr:

    Purple Revolution was a name first used by some hopeful commentators and later picked up by United States President George W. Bush to describe the coming of democracy to Iraq following the 2005 Iraqi legislative election and was intentionally used to draw the parallel with the Orange and Rose revolutions. However, the name “purple revolution” has not achieved widespread use in Iraq, the United States or elsewhere. The name comes from the colour that voters’ index fingers were stained to prevent fraudulent multiple voting. The term first appeared shortly after the January 2005 election in various weblogs and editorials of individuals supportive of the U.S. invasion of Iraq.[5] The term received its widest usage during a visit by U.S. President George W. Bush on February 24, 2005 to Bratislava, Slovak Republic for a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Bush stated: “In recent times, we have witnessed landmark events in the history of liberty: A Rose Revolution in Georgia, an Orange Revolution in Ukraine, and now, a Purple Revolution in Iraq.”[6]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colour_revolution

  4. says

    Dunc:

    So the United States was founded by Satanists, unlawfully rebelling against their rightful King, as anointed by God, right?

    If you’re gonna insist on sticking with history, yes.

  5. says

    Why can’t we have a flower revolution? There are a couple on the wiki page. I like Dandelion Revolution. Dandelions are bright, beautiful, and persistent. Every time someone thinks they’ve gotten rid of them, they pop back up.

  6. springa73 says

    I’m sure that if Clinton had won, these same people would be going on about the sacred and godly duty of resisting authority!

  7. emergence says

    These guys, along with the rest of the Republican party, Trump especially, are a load of hypocritical opportunists. After eight years of calling for Obama to be impeached, jailed, or assassinated, these assholes suddenly think you have to show absolute respect to the president.

  8. naturalcynic says

    I noticed that Blake’s Satan appears to have small hands and even a smaller penis in relation to the body. Reminds me of someone. But then, Satan is also Lucifer, the bringer of light and in some Gnostic texts, he is the bringer of knowledge. So, I guess that the comparison doesn’t hold after all.

  9. cubist says

    sez caine @8: “Why can’t we have a flower revolution? There are a couple on the wiki page. I like Dandelion Revolution. Dandelions are bright, beautiful, and persistent. Every time someone thinks they’ve gotten rid of them, they pop back up.”
    Dandelion Revolution? Interesting. In science-fiction fandom, there’s a thing called the Dandelion Conspiracy, whose purpose is to get SF conventions to accommodate filksingers’ particular needs. The dandelion was chosen for its symbol for pretty much the same reasons you like it here, Caine—”bright, beautiful, and persistent.”

  10. johnson catman says

    Wiles, who repeatedlycalled for Obama to be arrested and imprisoned when he was still in the White House, said that the recent protests against Trump are nothing short of sedition, which is itself inherently satanic.

    Could it be . . . SATAN?!

Leave a Reply